ML20149N103
| ML20149N103 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 02/23/1988 |
| From: | Warnick R NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20149N100 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-445-88-01, 50-445-88-1, 50-446-88-01, 50-446-88-1, NUDOCS 8803010241 | |
| Download: ML20149N103 (2) | |
Text
.
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION TU Electric Dockets:
50-445/88-01 50-446/88-01 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Permits:
CPPR-126 Units 1 and 2, Glen Rose, Texas CPPR-127 During an NRC inspection conducted on January 6 through February 2, 1988, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accor-dance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the viola-tion is listed below:
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 states, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented procedures, of a type appropriate to the circumstances, and shall l
be accomplished in accordance with these procedures.
1 Paragraph 6.7.3 of Procedure NQA 1.03 stated that NDE and inspec-l tion procedures require the approval of the discipline Level III I
inspector.
Paragraph 6.5.1 of Procedure NQA 1.03 stated, in part, that a document change notice (DCN) shall be forwarded to the appropriate Level III (if applicable), the Section Manager, and the Director, Quality Assurance for approval.
i l
Contrary to the above, DCN 3 to Procedure NQA 3.09-5.01, "Inspec-l 1
tion of Instrumentation Components," an inspection procedure, was issued without the approval of the discipline Level III inspector.
i DCN 3 revised the technical content of inspection Procedure NQA 3.09-5.01.
t l
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II) i (445/8801-V-02; 446/8801-V-02).
i Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, TU Electric is hereby l
required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.
S.
i Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Wash-l ington, DC 20555 with a copy to the Assistant Director for Inspec-I tion Programs, Comanche Peak Project Division, Office of Special Projects, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting i
this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a i
Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
i (1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective j
steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, t
and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an j
adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this j
i l
'9803010241 880223 ADOCK0500ggg5 PDR 0
i 2
Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Consideration may be given-to extending the response time for good cause shown.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
?PddFklumsk Dated at Comanche Peak Site this 23rd day of February, 1988 1
5 l
)
t I
l l
i l
I i
,.. _ _ _i
_