ML20148P039

Rev 1 to CK-MP3-05-02, Physical Drawing Review Attributes Checklist

ML20148P039
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	06/09/1997
From:	Neri A, Schopfer D NORTHEAST UTILITIES
To:
Shared Package
ML20148N977	List: ML20148N980 ML20148N988 ML20148P005 ML20148P013 ML20148P019 ML20148P027 ML20148P039 ML20148P049 ML20148P067
References
CK-MP3-05-02, CK-MP3-5-2, NUDOCS 9707010107
Download: ML20148P039 (14)

Text

. - -_=. -

O l

l Northeast Utilities l Millstone - Unit 3 l

, Independent Corrective Action Verification Program i

l (ICAVP) l 1

Walkdown Checklist ,

CK-MP3-05-02, Rev.1  :

Physical Drawinn Review Attributes Checklist

/

Prepared by: A.A.d)EX./

Name I. c 6/9 7 i tur Date l Approved by: 1.K.Sc.k.aky Name i 31 0 )

4' 9'9[

Signaturf Date IMPLEMENTATION System Document No/Rev.-

~~

Veri 6ed by:

~~

Concurrence by:

l l

l Sheet 1 of-(CK-MP3-0542. Rev.1. Fay 1)

C:CK34502. DOC 9707010107 970627 PDR ADOCK 05000423 P PDR ,,_

t .

Northeast Utilities CK-MP34542 Millstone Unit 3 System Sheet of

Physical Drawing Review Attributes Checklist l

l lastructions t

l

' 'Ihis checidist shall be used on a System basis to ensure that critical design attributes contained on Upper Tier documents (P& ids for Mechanical and Electncal Schematics and One Lines for Electncal) have been properly

[ and adequately incorporated into Imer Tier /-- - 4 (Piping Physical / Isometrics for Mechanical and i

Electric Wiring Diagrams, Cable Schedules and F:.y.ksis for Electrical) prior to walking down the system l against those Imer Tier 4:- - - =ts.

l The purpose of this review is to ensure that functionahty was properly incorporated from Upper Tier to Lower Tier documents

[ 1. In preparing these checkhsts, the Verifier shall first identify and retrieve the Upper Tier and Imer l

Tier M-ts/ drawings in the categories listed above, as identified in clwklid CK-MP3-05 01 previously prepared, and these 4: ==== shall include the redlining of open change documents as described in Section 5.3.4 of PI MP345.

2. In completing the culiers, the Verifier shall concentrate on functionality by determining whether the attributes listed have been properly incorporated on the physical drawings, and checking Yes, No, or N/A to the right of the attribute on the checkhst. In checking these answers, the following shall be observed

a. An answer shall be provided to each question, no questions are to be left blank,

b. Not applicable (N/A) shall only be used where an attribute is not present in the Upper Tier document.

c. Whenever the answer to a questial is "No", mennmg that the attribute being reviewed is unsatisfactory, a Comment No. shall be entered in the right hand column of the checklist, and a comment shall be entered on the appropriate " Comment Sheet" provided at the end of Attachment A or B , as applicable. C mr- - N shall be numbered sequentially within the Attachment A or B.

In addition, for each unsatisfactory response, the Preparer shall initiate a Discrepancy Report (DR) in accordance with PI-MP3 11. The DR number shall be referenced in the comment in Attachment A. orb.

d. When the Attachment A or B checklist has been completed, the Preparer shall print, sign and date at the end of the document in the space provided.

3. When the checklist in Attachment A and B have been completed for a System, the lead Verifier shall assemble the checklists with this package and sign the CK-MP3-05-02 cover sheet under " Verified by" to indicate that this portion of the System Review has been completed.

L l

(CK.MP3 05-42. Rev.1. Page 2)

CTK3 0$o2. DOC

_yn

. . - - . . . _ . . . _ - . . ~ - . . - _ . - . - . . - - . . . . - . . - - - - - - . - . . .

t ,

Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-05 02 Millstone Unit 3 System Sheet of Attachament A Meehaalcal Physical Drawlag Review Attributes Checklist j Have the following Mechanical attributes been properly and adequately incorporated from the P&ID to the l Piping Physical / Isometric drawings?

l Yes No C-a* No. N/A Mechanica1 Attribute:

j 1. Piping L 1.1 Pipingline numbers 1.2 Pipe size 1.3 Piping branch connection-sequence of takeoff 1.4 Reducersrtacreasers 1.5 Instrument connections in Proper sequence 1.6 Line slope properly designated forinstrumentlines, relief valve discharge lines, etc.

1.7 Vent connections in proper sequence andlocated at system high points 1.8 Drain connections properly sequenced andlocated at systemlow points  !

1.9 Valves, specialtyitems and equipment piped in proper '

sequence 1.10 Piping drawings agree with pipe hanger drawings with respect to location and support type.

1.11 Pipe hanger drawings properly incorporate class, location, and orientation with respect to physical piping drawings 1.12 P&ID notes relative to piping properly incorporated

2. Valves 2.1 Allvalves including numbers properly shown 2.2 Valve type properly designated (i.e., gate, globe,)

2.3 Check valves shown in proper flow direction _

2.4 Power for valve properly shown (i.e., air, electric, hydraulic) ,_

2.5 Valve sizes properly translated 2.6 P&ID notes relative to valves properly incorporated

3. Equipment (CK-MP34542. Rev.1, Page 3)

CTK345o2. DOC

. .-. ~__ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . - .

l t .

Northeast Utilities CK-MP3 05 02 Millstone Unit 3 System Sheet of Attachament A l

Mechanical Physical Drawing Review Attributes Checklist l

Yes No Comment No. N/A j 3.1 Allequipment on P&ID properly shown  !

3.2 Equiyn. cat ID correctly transferred

{

i 3.3 Process piping to equipment l

l mnnections properly shown l

l 3.4 Interface to skid mounted i

eqmpment clearly shown l l

3.5 P&ID notes relative to t

equipment properly l

4. Mietin===

4.1 Heat tracing reqmrements properlyincorporated 4.2 Cathodic protection l requirements properly incorporated 4.3 Continuation tointerfacing system drawings properly shown I 4.4 Specialtyitems called out on P& ids, (i.e., stramers, traps, l etc.) properly shown l 4.5 Miscellaneous notes on P& ids . I l Properly incorporated 4.6 Mechanical equipment, valves, i components, etc. properly oriented per manufacturer's drawing requirements _

5. Other List here any other attributes shown on the P& ids but not i listed above,and indicate wheder properly shown. (Add sheets as manry and number sequentially.)

l l

I l (CK.MP3442, Rev.1, Page 4)

CTK34502. DOC l

l 1 - .

4 Neitheast Utilities CK-MP3-05-02 Mllistone Unit 3 System Sheet of Attachament A Mechanical Physical Drawing Review Attributes Checklist i

l i

I l

l l

l I

1 l

l 2

l l

l l

l l l

l l

l I

i l (CK-MP345-02 Rev.1.Pae.5)

C:CK34502. DOC i

\

)

Northeast Utilities CK-MPW2 Millstone Unit 3 System l l

4 Sheet of Attachment A Mechanical Physical Drawing Review Attributes Checklist ,

I I

Comument Sheet Comment No. Comment i i 1 l

l I

4 I

1 (Attach additional sheets as necessary, sign and date last Mechanical Comment Sheet only)

Prepared by:

Name Signature Date (CK-MP3-05-02. Rev.1. Pase 6)

CtCK34502. DOC

4 Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-05-02 Mllistone Unit 3 System l

Sheet of Attachment B Electdcal Physical Drawing Review Attributes Checklist i

Have the following Electrical citributes been properly and adequately incorporated on the Electrical Wiring Diagrams and/or PhysicalDrawings?

Yes No Comment No. N/A Electrical Attribute:

1. Wiring Diagrams 1.1 Are the equipment / cable safety

classifications and segregation codes consistent within a spectfic panel?

1.2 is there reference back to the respective Schematic or One-line for determination of redundancy and separation requirements?

1.3 Is the segregation code, Class IE Division, etc., for each cable shown, applicable?

1.4 Have the panellayout l elevation drawings been reviewed to ensure that

' I separation and/or barriers are I provided between devices, i wiring and wiring 1 terminations,in accordance with the applicable requirements of the project design criteria with respect to separation of:

a. Devices and wiring (including terminations) assigned to different Nuclear Safety-Related divisions

b. Devices and wiring (including terminations) assigned to Nuclear l Safet3-Related divisions and Non-Safety-Related division devices and wiring (including terminations)?

l l

(CK-MP3-oS42. Rev.1, Page 7)

C:TK34502. DOC

Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-05-02

' Millstone Ucit 3 System l Sheet of Attachment B Electrical Physical Drawing Review Attributes Checklist l

Yes No Comment No. N/A

( l.5 Arc all contacts shown for

! devices that are furnished (i.e.,

l control switches, relays, l pressure andlevel switches, l

limit switches, etc.), and have l allcontact terminal

designations for such devices, l when shown on the schemate l diagrams,been verified?

l 1.6 If this is ajunction/ terminal l box winns diagram, does the quantity of terminal blocks /terminalpoints shown i agree with thejunction box l tabulation? l 1.7 Are the wiring terminations )

correct and in agreement with the corresponding schemvin diagram; and are wire l

destination and wire code designations (if required) shown at both ends ofinternal wiring; and are wire designations, color codes i and/or numbers,andcable numtsrs shown for external l cables? Does the method of labeling cable conductors (color codes or numbers) agree l with that of the cable purchased for the project.

l (CK.MP345-02, Rev.1. Pase s) i C:TK34502. DOC l

I

Northeast Utilities CK-MP345-02 l

! Millstone Ucit 3 System i Sheet of Attachment B Electrical Physical Drawing Review Attributes Checklist i Yes No Comment No. N/A i

l l

1.8 Have allinternaland/or externalwinng connections i been verified by a systematic, i point-by-point, color-coded review of the winng diagram with the circuit / circuit-part(s) shown on the corresponding schematic, relay and metering and synchropiring diagrams, to ensure circuitintegrity and continuityinthewiring? For i revision to existing design, l this review must include the areas of the related diagram (s) affected by the physicalwiring j change on the wiring diagram. I For the purposes of this review, the term, " areas of the ,.g related diagrams affected by 1 the physicalwiring change on the Wiring diagram"is defined toinclude all termination points of affected common wires (i.e. circuit nodesinterconnecting 3 or more circuit devi4 also referred to as " daisy-chain" circuits)within the modified equipment.

1.9 When more than one wiring diagram is required to complete one piece of equipment, are the drawings cross-referenced either by notes or a simple key plan or elevation detail?

1.10 Does each device have a cross-reference to its schematic diagram?

l l

l (CK-MP3442. Rev.1, Pase 9)

CEK3-0$02. DOC

Northeast Utilities CK-MP345-02 Millstone Unit 3 System Sheet of Attachment B Electrical Physical Drawing Review Attributes Checklist Yes No Comment No. N/A i

1.11 is the winns diagram drawing J

number added to the appropriate boxin the cable tabulation for cables shown terminated on the wiring

! diagram (three-line diagram).

4 Has the drawing number been added for the other end of the cableifcompleted?

1.12 Have appropnatejumpers and grounding been shown for unused cunent transformer secondaries? I 1.13 Are power, control and .i j instrumentation cable shields  !

shown terminated properly?

1.14 Haveinstrument, equipment or valve numbers been

M-ted on the drawings and the wiring diagram l drawing number referenced in ,

i the appropnate column on l instrument, equipment or valvelists?

2. Cable and Raleway Schedules l l

2.1 Do "from" and "to" agree with the one-line diagrams, wiring

. and the schematics?

2.2 Dves the conductor / conduit l size agree with infonnation shosrn on the one-line, wiring

diagram and on the physical drasings?

- 2.3 Does the conductor quaatity agree withinformation shown

, on the one-line, wiring and tle physical drawings?

2.4 Does the cable configuration agree withinformation shown on the one-line, wiring diagram and on the physical drawings?

(CK-MP3-05-02 Rev.1. Page 10)

CfCK34502. DOC

Northeast Utilities CK MP345-02 Millstone Unit 3 Systess Sheet of Attachement B Electrical Physical Drawing Review Attrilmtes Checklist Yes No Conunent No. N/A 2.5 Are all raceways (cable trays, l risen and conduitsin doctruns) idenh&vi by l segregation code or service code.

2.6 Does a note exist which  !

specifies which segregation codes ideahfy Nuclear Safety.

Related cable trays, risers and conduits in ductruns? l 2.7 Are routing pointslocated so that they clearlyindicate  ;

which cable traylevel(or which conduitin a ductrun) they refer to? i I

2.8 Does a nate exist which indicates the method of identifying the routing points on the cable trays in the field and the color coding to be used? __

2.9 Are relative position of trays that are stacked vertically ,

propertyindicated'on the  :

drawings?

2.10 Do the routing points agree with the physical drawings?

2.11 Has a method to track routing l point numbers been developed to prevent duplication of numbers?

2.12 Does raceway annariatian in CAR schedule agree with physicaldrawings?Sas the scale been identifiedand verified or a note aM that the drawing is not to scale and should not be used to measure i distances? 1 2.13 Do phase markings, phase positions, equipment ,

terminations and phase  !

identification in cable i number (s) agree with the i phasing diagram? i

3. Physical Drawings 1

(CK MP34fLo2, Rev.1. Pase 11)

CfCK34502. DOC l i

, . _ . . . - . - . . .. .. - - . ~ . - - - . _ - - . _ - . - . - - . . _ - --.__... - ..-. - - - .

l -

l .

Noetheast Utilities CK-MP3-05-02 Millstone Unit 3 System Sheet of Attachment B Electrical Physical Drawing Review Attributes Checklist Yes No Comment No. N/A

! 3.1 Location and size of all I electncalequipment?

3.2 Egy=: numbers for l- equipmentinvolved?

!- 3.3 Size and type of r=init?

! 3.4 L,p,M or service code of l each conduit and/or cable?

3.5 Junction / terminal box numbers shown?

3.6 Junction /terminalbox type and elevation, and terminalblock quantity?

3.7 Has the scale beenidentified and ven6ed or a note added that the drawingis not to scale and should not be used to measure distances?

3.8 Segregation code and routing

,_ points for each cable tray? _

3.9 Tolerances for electncal l equipmentlocations and routtng point locations?

3.10 Conduit seals are shownin l conduit runs per applicable Project procedures /

mstructions?

3.11 If conduit numbers are used, l have they been venfied to eliminate duplication?

3.12 Orientation inneallation of electrical equipment and components per manufacturer's drawing requirements.

3.13 Are tray / conduit supports identified? Arelocations

%uately shown?

Type / details referenced?

3,14 Equipment sealing information for raceway entry provided?

3.15 Are cable tray supports, routing points, and elevations

! shown on drawings?

3.16 1s flexible conduitidentified and shownin accordance with standards?

(CK MP345-o2, Rev.1. Fase 12)

CTK34502, DOC l

l _-.

o l Northeast Utilities CK-MP345-02 Millstone Unit 3 System Sheet of Attachaient B l

Electrical Physical Drawing Review Attributes Checklist i Yes No Comment No. N/A 3.17 Is appropriate grounding identified for equipment and raceways.

)

! 3.18 Are separation requirements

! identified and adequate on drawings? _

j l l

)

i i

i i

l (CK MP3-05-02, Rev.1. Page 13)

C:'CK34'J2. DOC

Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-05-02 Millstone Unit 3 System Sheet of Attachment B Electrical Physical Drawing Review Attributes Checklist Comment Sheet Comment No. Connent l

l J

l i

I l

l (Attach additional sheets as necessary, sign and date last Electrical Conunent Sheet only) l Prepared by:

i l

Name Signature Date (CK.MPJ4fL42. Rev,1. Pese 14)

C:TK34502. DOC