ML20148P027

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 2 to CK-MP3-03-11, Seismic Qualification Checklist
ML20148P027
Person / Time
Site: Millstone 
Issue date: 06/09/1997
From: Neri A, Tenwinker J
NORTHEAST UTILITIES
To:
Shared Package
ML20148N977 List:
References
CK-MP3-03-11, CK-MP3-3-11, NUDOCS 9707010105
Download: ML20148P027 (22)
v • d • e


Text

....

?

5 l -f,-

l I

Northeast Utilities Millstone - Unit 3 1%t Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP)

Modification Review Checklist CK-MP3-03-11, Rev. 2

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Seismic Onlinentian Checklist Prepared by:

T t-. hw/vm t/r/r 7

~

Name Date Approved by:

A A. meg /

4

    • /

f7

_ 'gnature /

Date Name Si IMPLEMENTATION System Modification No/ Description Verified by:

Date:

i Concurrence by:

Date:

I Sheet 1 of_

l l

f (ck-up3 03-II, Rev. 2 Page 1)

C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc

~

9707010105 970627 PDR ADOCK 05000423 p

PDR

1 A

Noetheast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Millsteme Unit 3 Systems l

Modification No.

1 Sheet of Attmehmaest B Seismic Qualification Review Checklist Instructions This c1=ek13d shall be used for the design process h=at renew process described in PI-MP3 02 and for the modification renew process described in PI-MP3-03.

1.

'Ihe Lead Verifier shall enter the System and, if applicable, the Modificaton Number / Description on the cWklid cover sheet.

2.

If reviewing a modification, the Lead Verifies or Discipline Veri 6er shall first detennine whether the modification includes the ad;htion of e-<.r = :- subject to seismic qualification If r.o such new e~-<.r - :- are being added by the modification, A*= chm-*

A and B of the checklist are not applicable, and the Verifier shall complete Attachment C only. For all other modifications, and for the system review, A*='.< :+ A, B, and C shall be completed as instructed herin. 'Ihe Lead Verifier or Discipline Verifiers shall determine which owf-:- = in the System or Modification are subject to seismic qualification and list those components on A*=ehment A of this checklist. Note that cuirwwiits which are identical or similar may be grouped on A*=chmant A such that only one Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist (CSQRC) is prepared for that group of-- <;--- ts. Grouping in this fashion should be based not only on component similarity, but also on the Millstone seismic qualification daanmar*=+k=. When A*=chmant A has been completed for the applicable System or Modification, print, sign, and date the bottom of Attachment A.

3.

Based on Attachment A, the Lead Verifier or Discipline Veri 6ers shall complete a CSQRC - see A*=ehment B of this checklist - for each component or group of components listed in A*=chment A. Each CSQRC shall be numbered sequentially for the System or Modification as delineated in Attachment A. Ifit kviiws necessary to revise the numbering mme, Attachment A shall be updated to agree. In completing Attachment B, the followmg shall be observed:

An answer shall be provided to each question; no questions are to be left blank.

a.

b.

Not Applicable (N/A) shall only be used where an "N/A" blank is provided in the checklist.

Whenever the answer to a question is "No," meaning that the seismic qualification l

c.

aspect being reviewed is unsatisfactory, a Comment No. shall be entered in the J

right hand column of the checklist, and a cuirsizzit shall be entered on the checklist j

provided at the end of Attachment B. Comments shall be numbered sequentially a

within an individual CSQRC. In addition, for each unsatisfactory response, the l

Preparer shall initiate a Discrepancy Report (DR) in accordance with PI-MP3-11.

4 The DR number shall be referenced in the comment in Attachment B.

(ck-mip343-11. Rev. 2, Page 2)

C:CK3-0311. DOC

{

g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc l

s Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachuseat B Seismic Qualincation Review Checklist d.

When the Ansch B CSQRC has beca completed, the Preparer shall print, sign, and date at the end of the document in the space provided.

4.

When all of the individual CSQRCs have been completed for a System or Modification, they shall be assembled together with Aww A and the main checklist for the Lead Verifier to review. The Lead Verifier shall then print, sign, and date the CK-MP3-03-11 cover sheet to signify that the seismic qualification review has been completed for the applicable System or Modification.

l 1

(ck-mp3-03-tl, Rev. 2, Page 3)

C:CK3 0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc

t

's Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

i Sheet of Attachment B l

Seismic Qualification Review Checklist Anachment B Checklist Component No.(s)

Description No.

r l

(Include additional sheets as necessary. Sign and date final sheet only.)

Prepared by:

Name Signature Date (ck-mp3-03-11, Rev. 2, Page 4)

C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\transfensrcheck. doc

i Nostheast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachament B Seismic Qualification Review Checklist Checklist No.

C-- : = s=t No.(s)

A.

COMPONENT IDENTIFICATION Spec.:

' /endor:

==

Description:==

Manufacturer /Model No.:

B.

DOCUMENT AND SOURCE IDENTIFICATION (Identify document no. and rev. or date)

,s Bl.

Qualification Report:

B2.

Postulated Dynamic Loads B3.

Classification:

B4.'

Mounting Details:

B5.

Other:

C.

CONCLUSION OF REVIEW-Accepted Rejected Comments:

2 D.

REFERENCES:

DI.

IEEE-344-1975 "IEEE Recommended Practices for Seismic Qualification of Class IE Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations" (ck-mp3 03-11, Rev. 2, Page 5)

C:CK3 0311. DOC g:\\trander\\srcheck. doc I

i Northeast Utilities CK-MP343-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Seismic Qualification Review Checklist D2.

NRC Regulatory Guide 1.61 " Damping Values for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants" D3.

NRC Regulatory Guide 1.92 " Combining Modal Responses and Spatial Cwpents in Seismic Ramme Analysis" D4.

NRC Regulatory Guide 1.100 " Seismic Quahfication of Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants" E.

CLASSIFICATION AND FUNCTION El.

Classification Nuclear Safety-Related Active: Component mun operate and/or remam functional:

during and after postulated dynamic events only aller postulated dymanuc events Nuclear Safety-Related Passivc: ne structural integrity and/or pressure integrity of the component must be demonstrated during and after postulated d>mamic events.

j Operability is not required.

1 i

Non-Safety-Related Seismic: Component has no safety-related function but must j

remam intact during and after postulated dynamic events.

E2.

"Ihe component's safety-related function (s) is:

)

1 F.

LOCATION AND MOUNTTNG 1

F1.

Location Building:

Elevation:

F2.

Field Mountina Condition i

Panel / pipe /HVAC au,-t:

Wall / floor:

(ck-mp343-11, Rev. 2 Page 6)

C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcMdm

t

  • 5 Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 i

Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

j Sheet of Attachment B Seismic Qualification Review Checklist i

i 1

Other:

F3.

Field Mountina Method Expansion anchor bolts l

Embedded anchor bolts Welding

)

Other:

G.

REOUIRED VIBRATORY INPUT G1. Pelatai Dynamic Loads to be Considered Seismic Seismic and hydrodynamic Other:

G2. Frequency range associated with postulated i

loads:

G3. Postulated dynamic loads defmed as:

Response Spectra a.

Method of combining required response spectra-Not applicable, only seismic loads pnctuintui Absolute sum SRSS 34-(ck-up3 43-il, Rev. 2. Page 7)

C:CK3 0311. DOC l

g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc l

l

3 Niribeast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Seismic Qualification Review Checklist b.

Damping:

Upset / Service Level B

Emergency / Service level C Faulted / Service level D c.

Basis for damping:

Seismic Coefficients (Required acceleration in each direction) a.

Upset / Service Level B:

Hi H2 V

b.

Emergency / Service H

H2 V

i Ievel C Faulted / Service Level D COMMENT yJS Ni2 NUMBER N/A G4. Are these dynamic loads defined at j

equipment mounting?

)

H.

METHOD OF OUALIFICATION Static Analysis Test Dynamic Analysis s.

Other:

Is the qualification method used capable of adequately demonstrating the component's ability to perform its safety function?

(ck-mp3-83-11. Rev. 2. Page 8)

C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc

.~

a

!*4 CK-MP343-11 I

Northeast Utilities Millstone Unit 3 Systess Modification No.

Sheet of 1

l Attachaient B Seisanic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT XFJi N_Q NUMBER

]MIA -

I.

OUALIFICATION BY TESTING II.

Does the qualification report identify the wipcit tested and is this w.eyces;t identical to the n-..r-:==^

being installed?

If no, has similarity been adequately A.-- w un?

12.

Mountmg Does the qualification report identify the test mounting and does the test mountmg simulate the r.ctur.! service mounting in regard to:

a. Mounting method (bolt or weld)
b. Bolt torque requirements or anti-loosening requirements?

i

c. Mountingorientation?

13.

Interfacina Connections and Str.getures Does the qualification report adequately address the effect of the followmg interfaces:

a. Piping?

t l

b. Electricalconduit?
c. Instrumentation tubing?

I4. Test Inout Motion (ck-mp343-11, Rev. 2, Page 9)

C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc

s

?i Northeast Utilities CK-MP343-11 L

Mmd-Unit 3 Systeen Medincation No.

Sheet of Attachment B Seismaic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT XEE HQ NUMBER H/A Single Axis;does the qualification report adequately account for cross-coupling effects in awd.rs with IEEE-344-1975, Secten 6.6.67 C - :== is rigid, no possibility of cross-coupling.

Dependent (pseudo) biaxial u p, biaxial i

I@* triaxial 15.

Are the number of test orientations in accordance with IEEE-344-1975, Section 6.6.67 I6.

Test Inout Waveform Sine Dwell (Single Frequency) a.

Does the qualification report adequately l

account for multimode l

excitation in accordance with IEEE-344-1975, Section 6.6.27 Component is rigid, no possibility of multimode excitation.

b.

Is the sinusoidalinput motion applied at:

(ck-up343-11.Rev.2 Page 10)

C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\transfensrcheck. doc

. ~

\\

s i

Northeast Utilities CK-MP343-11 Millstone Unit 3 System l

Modification No..

i Sheet of Attachment B Seismic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT XES ND NUMBER MA

1. Frequencies spaced no furtherthan % octave intervals
2. Each equipment's natural fiqueicy?

c.

Is the test duration in accordance with IEEE-344-1975, Section 6.6.5 (equivalent to five OBEs i

and one SSE where the duration of each event is equivalcnt to the duration of the strong motion portion of the i

SSE?)

d.

Is the peak amplitude of the input greater than or equal to the ZPA of the RRS?

i Sine Beat (Single Frequency) a.

Does the qualification report aA=wtaly account for multimode excitationin accordance with IEEE-344-1975, Section 6.6.2?

Component is rigid, i

l no possibility of multimode excitation.

(ck-imp 343-11, Rev. 2, Page 11)

C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc

4 i

Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 j

Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of i

Attachment B Seismic Qualification Review Cliecklist COMMENT YES N_Q NUMBER N/A j

l I

b.

Are the sine beats applied at:

)

1. Frequencies spaced l

j no further than 1/2 octave intervals.

2. Each equipment's natural frequency?

c.

Is there a sufficient Pau= between application ofbeats (at any one frequency)to i

avoid superposition of equipment response motion?

d.

Is the test duration in accordance with j

IEEE-344-1975, Section 6A.5 (equivalent 'o Svc OBEs and cre SSE where the duntion of cach event is J

equivalent to the duration of the strong motion portion of the SSE)?

c.

Is the peak amplitude of the input greater l

than or equal to the ZPA of the RRS?

l I

(ck-mp3-03-tl, Rev. 2, Page 12)

C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\transfensrcheck. doc l

  • i Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System l

Modification No.

l Sheet of Attachment B Seismic Qualification Review Checklist C_OMMEM XES NQ MU_MBER N/A Random Motion (Mutilfrequency) a.

Is theinput motion controlled using 1/3 octave or narrower bandwidth Siters?

b.

Is the amplitude of the input controlled such that:

1. The peak amplitude of the input is greater i

than or equal to the ZPA of the RRS.

2. The TRS envelopes the RRS?

i c.

Is the duration ofthe test input in accordance with IEEE-344-1975, Section 6.6.5 (equivalent to five OBEs and one SEE where the duration of each event is equivalent to the durationof the strong motion portion of the SSE but is rd less than 15 second)?

17.

Dynamic Characteristics l

l l

Natural frequencies not l

deternuned l

l (ck-mp3-03-11, Rev. 2, Page 13)

C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc

'Y Northeast Utilities CK-MP343-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Seismic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT YES N.Q NUMBER BlA Natural frequencies:

Hi H2 V

nese frequencies were determired via:

Sine Sweep, frequency range input acceleration sweep rate Other:

18.

Normal Ooeratina Conditim Does the qualification report adequately address the following normal operating loads:

l Electrical Loads?

Mechanical Loads?

1 Hermal Loads?

l Pressure?

Operating vibration? (rotating equipment) i l

(ck-mp343-11, Rev. 2, Page 14) l C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc

,=

4 Northeast Utilities CK-MP343-11 Millstone Unit 3 Systems Medincation No.

Sheet of b

Attachment B Seismic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT X E 1 N.Q NUMBER N/A 19.

Momtoring

a. -Was the monitormg of the g_. ; =r ad~;"* to evaluate its performance? -
b. Was the operability of the cu r.yors.t verified?
c. Did the comporsit's performance satisfy functional requirements?

I10 Disoosition oftest Anomalies Have all test anomalies been W*!y dispositioned?

J.

QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS J1.

Type of Analysis Static Analysis Simplified Dynamic Analysis Response Spectrum Analysis Time History Analysis Other:

J2.

AamivtiM Model Finite Element Other:

(ck-mp34311 Rev. 2, Page 15)

C:CK3 0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc

A Northeast Utilities CK-MP343-11 l

Millstone Unit 3 Systems l

Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Seismic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT XES N_Q NUMBER N_2A J3.

Method of Analysis Computer-Aided Calculation 1

a. Programs used:
b. Is there evidence that the programs used have been validated?

Yes No Hand Calculation J4.

Operatina Loads Does the qualification report adequately address the followmg normal operating loads?

a. Piping nozzle reactions?
b. Electrical conduit reactions?
c. Pressure?
d. 'Ihermal expansion?
e. Startup torque for rotating equipment?

J5.

Static /Simolified Dynamic Analysis l

i i

I (ck-mp343-11, Rev. 2 Page 16)

C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc

l

.i

' Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-OS-11 Mmada=* Unit 3 Systems Modification No.

[

Sheet of Attachament B Seismile Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT XM ND.

NUMBER Nld

a. Is the analysis method used justified in accord.rm with the guidelines established by NRC Regulatory Guide 1.100, Section Cl?
b. Do the seismic coefficients used in
the analysis envekge the required input
w=hd=W to occur at the equipment base?
c. Are the seismic coefficients applied in each of the three orthogonal directions simultaneously?

J6.

Resonnae Socctra Modal Annivsis

a. Do the response spectra used in the analysis envelop the RRS?

I

b. Does the model used adequately i

represent the equipment's:

1. Mass distribution?
2. Stiffness characteristics?
3. Boundaryconditions?

t

c. Is the cutoff frequency for the analysis adequate to ensure that the i

effect of all significant modes is considered?

d. Is the method ofcombining modal responses in accordance with NRC Regulatory Guide.1.92?

l (ck-up3-03-11, Rev. 2, Page 17)

C:CK3 0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc

b Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System i

Modification No.

Sheet d.,, _

Attachment B Seismic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT Xf4 N_Q NUMBER NlA J7.

Results

a. Are the correct allowable stresses identified?
b. Does the analysis h* ate that all stresses are below the allowable?
c. Does the analysis adequately assure operability by &=-,+ging that all deflections / clearances are within the allowables?

K.

DESIGN REOUIREMENTS/ CONSTRAINTS Kl. Does the quahfication report identify any design requirements / constraints which need to beimplemented by parties other than the supplier (and/or his subcontractor,if any)?

If no, go to Section L.

If yes, list these requirements /constramts in the comments section and provide references. 'Then complete Item K2.

K2. Are these design requirements /

constramts incorporated (as applicable) in the:

a. Design Change Documents for existing configurations?

If yes, specify te the comments section.

(ck-asp 343-11 Rev. 2 Page 18)

C:CK3 0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc

W Northeast Utilities.

CK-MP3 43-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Seismic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT XEE N.Q NUMBER NJ.A.

b. appropriate design 4xn= :-

(includmg vendor drawmgs) for new or attemate rephe components or new construction within the design scope?

L.

DOCUMENTATION L1. Does the qualification report define all input data and assumptions?

L2. Does the report indicate that it has been reviewed and approved by the originatmg organiration?

L3. For test reports:

a. Is the test facilityidentified?
b. Is the test equipment along with date oflast calibration identified?
c. Is the report complete (i.e., no pages missing)?

Prepared by:

Name Signature Date (ck-mp3-83-11 Rev. 2, Page 19)

C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc

.~

',)

Nodheast Utilities CK-MP343-11

' Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Seismic Qualificatlos Review Checklist Comment No.

Comment Attach additional pages as necessary.

(ck-mp343-11, Rev. 2, Page 20)

C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srclak. doc

NCrtheast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment C Seismic Qualifications Review Checklist for Modifications Identify the potential impact of the modification on the seismic qualification of existing systems, structures, or components, discuss how this impact was addressed by the modification, and indicate whether this was adequately addressed and why it is aWata Ifit is determmed that this issue was not adequately addressed, initiate a Discrepancy Report (DR) as required by PI-MP3-11, and include reference to the DR number in the Attachment C. (Use the continuation page as necessary.)

)

i 1

f The effect of the modification on seismic qualifications of existing systems, structures, and components was adequately addressed.

Yes No Prepared by Date (ck-mp3-03-11 Rev. 2, Page 21)

C:CK3-0311. DOC g:\\ transfer \\srcheck. doc

- - ~.

li N^rtheast Utilities CK-MP34311 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment C Seismic Qualification Review Checklist for Modifications (Continuation Page) l l

3 i

l l

(CK-MP343-11 Rev.2.Pase 22)

CfCK34311. DOC g Wansfa%rchat_ doc 1

l

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20148P027&oldid=4171433"