Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML20148N2751988-03-29029 March 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Requirement to Monitor Ambient Temp in Instrument Penetrations Housing Flow Sensors for Dewpoint Moisture Monitoring Sys Project stage: Other ML20207E9911988-08-0505 August 1988 Forwards Amend 61 to License DPR-34 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Changes Tech Specs Re Deletion of Requirement to Monitor Temp of Dew Point Moisture Monitors Project stage: Approval 1988-03-29
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20100L3581996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Submitting Corrected Version of Plant Decommissioning TS Updated to Reflect All Approved Amends ML20082K2461995-04-14014 April 1995 Proposed Decommissioning Tech Specs Administrative Control 5.3.1,reflecting Organizational Changes That Impact Membership of Decommissioning Safety Review Committee ML17291B3261993-05-18018 May 1993 Proposed TS Section 2.2 Re Activated Graphite Blocks,Section 2.4 Re Channel Calibr & SR 3.2.1 Re Verification of Reactor Bldg Pressure & SR 3.2.2 Re Verification of Pressure Drop Across Each HEPA Filter ML20118B2141992-09-25025 September 1992 Proposed Decommissioning Tech Specs Replacing Radiation Safety with Nuclear Safety, Revising Applicability Requirements for Specs Dealing W/Reactor Bldg Confinement Integrity & Clarifying Items Re Unreviewed Safety Questions ML20096H1961992-05-19019 May 1992 Decommissioning TS Deleting Section 4.2.15 Re LCO 4.2.15 Covering Pcrv Cooling Water Sys Temps ML20095B0951992-04-14014 April 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Re Organization,Review & audit-administrative Controls ML20094L2831992-03-19019 March 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Re Controls & Limits Appropriate for Decommissioning ML20086C5301991-11-15015 November 1991 Proposed Tech Spec Limiting Condition for Operation 4.2.15 Re Pcrv Cooling Water Sys Temps ML20091D7631991-10-11011 October 1991 Proposed,Revised Limiting Condition for Operation 4.2.15 Re Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vessel Cooling Water Sys Temp ML20082L9311991-08-30030 August 1991 Proposed Tech Specs Re Decommissioning ML20066A3781990-12-21021 December 1990 Proposed Decommissioning Tech Specs Re Reactor Bldg Integrity,Reactor Bldg Ventilation Exhaust Sys,Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation & Pcrv Shielding Water Tritium Concentration ML20059L5891990-09-14014 September 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Design Features Section 6.1 to Permit Removal of CRD & Orifice Assemblies from Core Regions Defueled in Support of Plant Closure Activities ML20042F3151990-04-26026 April 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Re Defueling ML20006B7921990-01-25025 January 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Title Changes to Section 7.1 ML19332F3561989-12-0404 December 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Limiting Condition for Operations 4.7.3, Fuel Storage Wells & 4.7.5, Instrumentation. ML19332E8901989-12-0404 December 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactivity Control & Control Rod Pair Position Requirements During Shutdown ML19332C8151989-11-21021 November 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Items 2.D.(1) & 2.D.(4) Re Max Power Level & Early Shutdown,Respectively ML19324B6961989-10-30030 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactor Core & Reactivity Control ML19327B1321989-10-13013 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Deleted Limiting Conditions of Operations 4.1.2 Through 4.1.6,deleted Surveillance Requirements 5.1.1,5.1.2,5.1.3 & 5.1.5 & Newly Added Reactivity Control Section ML19351A3271989-10-13013 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs 6.1 Re Defueling Phase Document Design Features ML20248G4731989-10-0101 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re End of Operations ML20248G4461989-09-30030 September 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Chlorine Detection & Alarm Sys & Control Room Emergency Ventilation Sys ML20247G7811989-09-14014 September 1989 Proposed Tech Specs,Documenting Design Features for Defueling Phase of Operation ML20247L1721989-09-14014 September 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactivity Control ML20247J2371989-09-14014 September 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Fuel Handling & Storage ML20247G7341989-09-14014 September 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting Fire Protection Limiting Condition of Operation & Surveillance Requirements from Tech Specs ML20246K9921989-07-14014 July 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Documenting Improvements to Battery Surveillance Procedures ML20246L0231989-07-14014 July 1989 Proposed Tech Specs,Rewording Basis for Limiting Condition for Operation 4.2.2 Re Operable Circulator ML20244B3771989-06-0909 June 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Early Shutdown of Plant ML20245B3211989-04-14014 April 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Radiation Monitors & Noble Gas Monitors ML20155J6281988-10-14014 October 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Concerning Administrative Controls ML20155J6111988-10-14014 October 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Pcrv & Pcrv Penetration Overpressure Protection Surveillance ML20204E8171988-10-13013 October 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Linear channel-high Neutron Flux Trip Setpoints ML20207E1591988-08-0505 August 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Auxiliary Electric Sys Involving Proposed Change of Dc Batteries ML20155J7181988-06-14014 June 1988 Revised Draft Tech Specs 3/4.6.5.2,deleting Charcoal Filter Test Exceptions After Painting W/Low Solvent paints,6.5.1.2 & 6.2.3.3,reflecting Recent Util Reorganization & 3/4.7.1.5 & 3/4.7.1.6,requiring One Operable Valve Per Loop ML20151R8191988-04-20020 April 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting 10CFR51.5(b)2 ML20151S2471988-04-20020 April 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Pages 4.6-4 & 4.6-8,allowing Up to 5 Consecutive Days to Perform Equalizing Charge W/Station Battery ML20148N2751988-03-29029 March 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Requirement to Monitor Ambient Temp in Instrument Penetrations Housing Flow Sensors for Dewpoint Moisture Monitoring Sys ML20149M2901988-02-0808 February 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Re Plant Protective Sys Trip Setpoint & Operating Requirements ML20149N0391988-02-0505 February 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Changes to Administrative Controls to Reflect Organizational Changes in Util & NRC ML20238C3481987-12-23023 December 1987 Proposed re-drafted Tech Specs,Upgrading Sections Re safety- Related Cooling Sys.Related Info Encl ML20236C6361987-10-15015 October 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Fire Protection Limiting Conditions for Operation & Surveillance Requirements ML20235W8611987-10-0101 October 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Actions on Inoperable Halogen or Particulate Monitors & Conditions Requiring Weekly Gamma Spectral Analysis on Inservice Gas Waste Tank ML20235B0091987-08-28028 August 1987 Proposed Tech Specs Re Trip Setpoints & Operating Requirements ML20216H7301987-06-25025 June 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding Definition of Calculated Bulk Core Temp & Core Average Inlet Temp for Determination of Core Temp ML20210B7081987-04-23023 April 1987 Proposed Tech Specs Re Surveillance & Calibr Requirements of Plant Protective Sys Parameters ML20206P3931987-04-0808 April 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising 3/4.1.7, Reactivity Change W/Temp to Be Consistent W/Increased Values for Calculated Reactivity Worth of Reserve Shutdown Sys,Per Rev 4 to FSAR, Section 3.5.3.3 ML20207P9911987-01-15015 January 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Requiring Both evaporator-economizer Superheater Sections & Both Reheater Sections to Be Available During Operation at Power as Min Number of HXs ML20207D2421986-12-23023 December 1986 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting Snubber Tables & Correcting Typos ML20212A0661986-12-19019 December 1986 Proposed Tech Specs Re Steam Line Rupture Detection/ Isolation Sys 1996-02-22
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20148U0111997-06-17017 June 1997 Confirmatory Survey of Group E Effluent Discharge Pathway Areas Fsv Nuclear Station Platteville,Co ML20133D7661996-09-16016 September 1996 Confirmatory Survey Plan for Fsv Nuclear Station Decommissioning Project ML20129A4621996-09-11011 September 1996 Rev 0 to Fsv Decommissioning Project Final Survey Requirements for Liquid Effluent Pathway ML20100L3581996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Submitting Corrected Version of Plant Decommissioning TS Updated to Reflect All Approved Amends ML20097C2601996-01-17017 January 1996 Confirmatory Survey Activities Plan for Fsv Nuclear Station PSC Platteville,Co ML20101F2091995-09-18018 September 1995 Issue 7 to DPP 5.4.2, Odcm ML20084B8801995-05-25025 May 1995 Rev 1 to Fsv Nuclear Station Decommissioning Project Final Survey Plan for Site Release ML20084B6881995-05-10010 May 1995 Issue 5 to Fire Protection Operability Requirements (Fpor) FPOR-7, Fire Extinguishers ML20082K2461995-04-14014 April 1995 Proposed Decommissioning Tech Specs Administrative Control 5.3.1,reflecting Organizational Changes That Impact Membership of Decommissioning Safety Review Committee ML20082T2151995-04-12012 April 1995 Issue 7 to Fire Protection Operability Requirements (Fpor) FPOR-12, Fire Detectors ML20082B9411995-03-17017 March 1995 Confirmatory Survey Plan for Repower Area,Fort St Vrain, Platteville,Co ML20082C0801995-03-16016 March 1995 Proposed Confirmatory Survey Plan for Repower Area,Fort St Vrain,Platteville,Co ML20082B9821995-03-15015 March 1995 Instrumentation Comparison Plan Between Orise & Fort St Vrain ML20086S2471995-02-0909 February 1995 Decommissioning Plan for Fort St Vrain Nuclear Generating Station ML20077C7171994-11-30030 November 1994 Issue 9 to FPOR-14, Fire Protection Operability Requirements ML20078C0641994-10-12012 October 1994 Revised Fire Protection Operability Requirements,Including Issue 21 to Depp Table of Contents,Issue 2 to FPOR-22 & Issue 3 to FPOR-23 ML20081J7951994-09-15015 September 1994 Issue 5 to DPP 5.4.2, Odcm ML20063M1551994-02-17017 February 1994 Rev 0 to Fsv Nuclear Station Decommissioning Project Final Survey Plan for Site Release ML20057A6151993-08-30030 August 1993 Issue 2 to FPOR-23, Fire Water Makeup Sys ML17291B3261993-05-18018 May 1993 Proposed TS Section 2.2 Re Activated Graphite Blocks,Section 2.4 Re Channel Calibr & SR 3.2.1 Re Verification of Reactor Bldg Pressure & SR 3.2.2 Re Verification of Pressure Drop Across Each HEPA Filter ML20118B2141992-09-25025 September 1992 Proposed Decommissioning Tech Specs Replacing Radiation Safety with Nuclear Safety, Revising Applicability Requirements for Specs Dealing W/Reactor Bldg Confinement Integrity & Clarifying Items Re Unreviewed Safety Questions ML20114D6871992-09-0101 September 1992 Tritium Leach Test on H-327 Graphite ML20096H1961992-05-19019 May 1992 Decommissioning TS Deleting Section 4.2.15 Re LCO 4.2.15 Covering Pcrv Cooling Water Sys Temps ML20095B0951992-04-14014 April 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Re Organization,Review & audit-administrative Controls ML20094L2831992-03-19019 March 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Re Controls & Limits Appropriate for Decommissioning ML20086C5301991-11-15015 November 1991 Proposed Tech Spec Limiting Condition for Operation 4.2.15 Re Pcrv Cooling Water Sys Temps ML20079M4261991-10-11011 October 1991 Revised Abnormal Operating Procedures,Reflecting Deletion of Issue 9 of EP Class ML20091D7631991-10-11011 October 1991 Proposed,Revised Limiting Condition for Operation 4.2.15 Re Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vessel Cooling Water Sys Temp ML20082L9311991-08-30030 August 1991 Proposed Tech Specs Re Decommissioning ML20082H8851991-08-16016 August 1991 Issue 2 to Abnormal Operating Procedure AOP-I-2, Chemical, Petroleum & Hazardous Waste Spill Response ML20091C4141991-08-0202 August 1991 Issue 58 to Abnormal Operating Procedure AOP-L, Loss of Instrument Air Header ML20024H3341991-05-10010 May 1991 Nonproprietary Rev 2 to FSV-P-SCP-100, Fort St Vrain Initial Radiological Site Characterization Program Program Description ML20072V5291991-04-12012 April 1991 Revised Defueling Emergency Response Plan,Including Section 1 Definitions,Section 2 Scope & Applicability,Section 3 Summary of Fsv Derp,Section 4 Emergency Classifications & Section 5 Emergency Organization ML20070V6871991-03-20020 March 1991 Issue 55 to Abnormal Operating Procedure AOP-R, Loss of Access to Control Room ML20072S0521991-03-15015 March 1991 Public Version of Revised Crisis Mgt Implementing Procedures,Including Rev 9 to CMIP-11, Classification of Emergency for McGuire Nuclear Station & Rev 11 to CMIP-12, Classification of Emergency for Oconee Nuclear Station ML20066J1171991-02-15015 February 1991 Issue 56 to Intro Section of Abnormal Operating Procedure (Aop),Issue 58 of AOP-A,Issue 58 to AOP-B,Issue 56 of AOP D-1 & Issue 2 of RERP-TRANSPORTATION ML20066A3781990-12-21021 December 1990 Proposed Decommissioning Tech Specs Re Reactor Bldg Integrity,Reactor Bldg Ventilation Exhaust Sys,Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation & Pcrv Shielding Water Tritium Concentration ML20059L5891990-09-14014 September 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Design Features Section 6.1 to Permit Removal of CRD & Orifice Assemblies from Core Regions Defueled in Support of Plant Closure Activities ML20058N1071990-08-10010 August 1990 Issue 56 to AOP-I, Discussion of Fire ML20042F3151990-04-26026 April 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Re Defueling ML20006B7921990-01-25025 January 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Title Changes to Section 7.1 ML19332E8901989-12-0404 December 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactivity Control & Control Rod Pair Position Requirements During Shutdown ML19332F3561989-12-0404 December 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Limiting Condition for Operations 4.7.3, Fuel Storage Wells & 4.7.5, Instrumentation. ML19332C8151989-11-21021 November 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Items 2.D.(1) & 2.D.(4) Re Max Power Level & Early Shutdown,Respectively ML20064B2111989-11-0909 November 1989 Fort St Vrain Cycle 4 RT-500L Test Rept ML19324B6961989-10-30030 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactor Core & Reactivity Control ML19327B1321989-10-13013 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Deleted Limiting Conditions of Operations 4.1.2 Through 4.1.6,deleted Surveillance Requirements 5.1.1,5.1.2,5.1.3 & 5.1.5 & Newly Added Reactivity Control Section ML19351A3271989-10-13013 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs 6.1 Re Defueling Phase Document Design Features ML20248G4731989-10-0101 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re End of Operations ML20248G4461989-09-30030 September 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Chlorine Detection & Alarm Sys & Control Room Emergency Ventilation Sys 1997-06-17
[Table view] |
Text
, . .
Fort St. Vrain #1 Technical Specifications Amendment No.
Page 4.4-9 NOTES FOR TABLES 4.4-1 through 4.4-4 (continued)
(r) Separate instrumentation is provided on each circulator for this functional unit. Only the affected- helium circulator shall be shut down within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> if the indicated requirements are not met.
(s) Deleted.
(t) A primary coolant dew point moisture monitor shall not be considered operable unless the following conditions are met:
- 1) Reactor Power Range Minimum Sample Flow Startup to 2% 1 sec/sec.
> 2% - 5% 5 sec/sec.
> 5% - 20% 15 scc /sec.
>20% - 35% 30 sec/sec.
>35% - 100% 50 sec/sec.
- 2) Minimum flow of item 1) is alarmed in the control room and the alarm is set in accordance with the power ranges specified.
l 3) Deleted.
- 4) Fixed alarms of I scc /sec and 75 sec/sec are operable.
eBR4288eA888883!7 0
P DCD
i l
l ATTACHMENT 3 SAFETY EVALUATION w- , , _ - . - -~ m
Attachment.3 to P-88058 Page'1 of 3 SAFETY EVALUATION
Background
The Dewpoint Moisture Monitoring system is _ a part of the Plant Preter.tive System. It is designed to provide automatic protective action in the event of moisture ingress to the primary coolant system during reactor operation at power. The Dewpoint Moisture Monitor system is used to detect high moisture in the primary coolant loop, and provide a signal to the Plant Protective System circuitry, which scrams the reactor and shuts down and dumps the primary coolant loop when the moisture content in the PCRV reaches the instrument setpoint.
The Dewpoint Moisture Monitor system consists of eight detectors.
Three detectors continuously sample the primary coolant stream in each primary coolant loop. Two of these three detectors operate in the trip mode only. The third detector in each loop is a combination trip and indicating instrument. Two other detectors sample a mixture of primary coolant from both loops.
Each Dewpoint Moisture Monitor channel consists of a light source, a reflected light detector mirror and an amplifier assembly. The light source consists of a lamp and a photo cell. The photo cell is used to provide a feedback signal for adjustment of light intensity. The detector and amplifier, in general terms, convert the reflected light to electrical signals to provide input into the trip and indicating circuits. The amount of light reaching the photo cell is reflective of the amount of moisture collected on the mirror.
The response time of the Dewpoint Moisture Monitor system is governed by two criteria. The first is the time to physically transport the sample gas to the mirror. The second is the time to condense moisture in the sample gas to scatter the incident light being reflected to the photo cell.
r h
I i
- - - - -- _ _ - _ _ , _ _ _ , - ~ _ , _ . - , _ _ _ _ - - - - ,.. ..
Attachment 3 to P-88051
. Page 2 of 3 An affect on the required sample flow rates is that of the thermal environment within the penetration. A greater than 185 F temperature environment where the detectors are housed could have a potential >
adverse affect on the response time of the system. The purpose of monitoring the ambient temperature in the penetration was to verify the design basis assumption, included in GA reports GAA13677 and '
GAA13823, that the environment is no greater than 185 F for the Dewpoint Moisture Monitor detectors located in the instrument penetrations. This temperature criterion was incorporated into the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specifications by Amendment 13. This reflected the Public Service Company of Colorado (PSC) commitment to install temporary thermocouples to obtain data to confirm the ,
temperature design basis.
Data from installed thermocouples has been collected for over 10 years. This data indicates the maximum temperature in the instrument penetrations was 135 F, which includes operations up to and including i full power operation. This demonstrates the validity of the design basis assumption.
Evaluation
- The proposed change to the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specifications deletes the requirement to monitor the temperature in the closed instrument penetration. This requirement was incorporated into the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specifications by Amendment 13. The data collected over the past 10 years has demonstrated the design basis assumption is valid over the complete power range. The requirement to monitor the temperature is no longer required based on this conclusion.
Consideration of the proposed change to delete the temperature monitoring requirement from the conditions to be met to consider Dewpoint Moisture Monitor system operable involves evaluation of accident or equipment functions previously evaluated in the FSAR. As required by 10CFR50.59, the following questions are cddressed:
' 1) Has the probability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or . malfunction of equipment important to safety previously evaluated in the FSAR been increased?
! Removing monitoring instrumentation and recording inputs does not compromise the system's capability to initiate its
! protective features. Since the recorded data confirmed the validity of the design basis assumption, the system operational and functional requirements are maintained as designed. System response is maintained as previously tested and evaluated. The sample flow rates and alarm requirements are not affected by this change.
i
Attachment 3 to P-88051
. Page 3 of 3
- 2) Has the possibility of an accident or malfunction of a different type than any evaluated previously in the FSAR been created?
Since the monitoring instrumentation and recording data histories have demonstrated valid design basis assumptions, the Dewpoint Moisture Monitor system will perform its intenued function as designed, tested, and evaluated. The monitoring instrumentation is comp.letely independent of any Dewpoint Moisture Monitor control or protective function.
- 3) Has the margin of safety, as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification been reduced?
The monitoring instrumentation has confirmed tre original design basis assumptions. The sample flow rate and associated alarm requirements remain the same.
Public Service Company of Colorado (PSC) concludes that operability of the Dewpoint Moisture Monitor system is adequately demonstrated by the remaining Technical Specification requirements: a minimum sample flow rate for each specified power range, a minimum flow alarm in the control room set in accordance with the specified power range, and fixed alarms of I scc /sec and 75 scc /sec. Monitoring of the instrument penetration environments has demonstrated the temperatures will not exceed 185 F over the full power range. PSC considers this design basis assumption to have been validated and it is no longer required to be monitored. Thus, the proposed change to the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specifications does not result in an unreviewed safe ty question.
i l
l t
1
ATTACHMENT 4 SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION l
Attachment 4 to P-88051-Page 1 of 1 t
SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION I. Evaluation Based upon the safety evaluation provided as Attachment 3 to this Technical Specification proposed change, it is concluded that deleting the requirement to monitor the temperatures in the instrument penetrations will not have a deleterious affect on operation of the Dewpoint Moisture Monitor system. It is further concluded that the proposed change does not result in an unreviewed safety question.
- 1. Neither the probability nor consequences of accidents previously evaluated have been affected by -this proposed Technical Specification change. The data from the monitoring instrumentation and recording inputs confirmed ;
a valid design basis assumption. Removing the instrumentation does not compromise the system's capability to perform its design function.
- 2. The possibility of a new or different kind of accident from those previously evaluated has not been introduced.
The monitoring instrumentation is completely independent of any Dewpoint Moisture Monitor system control or
- 3. No margins of safety have been reduced as a result of the proposed change. The intent of the monitoring was to verify a design basis assumption, which was verified. The remaining conditions to be met provide assurance that the response time of the system will be adequate, and the operators will be alerted if the sample flow rates are unacceptable.
II. Conclusion a Based on the evaluation provided above, it is concluded that operation of Fort St. Vrain in accordance with the proposed changes will not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, (2) create the possibility of a new or _different kind cf accident from any accident previously evaluated, or (3) involve a sign.ificant reduction in any margin of safety. Therefore this change will neither create an undue risk to the health and safety of the public nor involve any significant hazards consideration.
j'
, , , ,_m....,. , . . _ . - = . - ~ , ,, , , . , _ , _ . . - - _ . . , - - . . _ - . _ _ , _ . - - _ - . _ _ _ , , , , , _ . _ -__ _ . - -