ML20148M951

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-348/88-07 & 50-364/88-07 on 880211-0310.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Monthly Surveillance & Maint Observations,Radiological Protection Program & Physical Security Program
ML20148M951
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 03/28/1988
From: Bradford W, Dance H, Miller W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20148M938 List:
References
50-348-88-07, 50-348-88-7, 50-364-88-07, 50-364-88-7, NUDOCS 8804060267
Download: ML20148M951 (6)


See also: IR 05000348/1988007

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

  1. pt Itopq'o

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES

'

'

-

,0

f

nEGloN il

o

J ..

j

101 MARIETTA STRE ET. N.W.

  • i

- '

ATLANT A, GEORGI A 30323

\\...../

Report Nos.:

50-348/88-07 and 50-364/88-07

Licensee: Alabama Power Company

600 North 18th Street

Birmingham, AL 35291

Docket Nos.:

50-348/88-07 and 50-364/88-07

License Nos.:

NPF-2 and NPF-8

Facility name:

Farley 1 and 2

Inspection Conducted:

February 11 - March 10, 1988

Inspection at Farley site near Dothan, Alabama

Inspectors: ,./_ s ']

bfv ktw

  • $ f7f fVY

W! H Bradford

Date Signed

"

LraL

sin /w

.

W.HsMille7

Date Signed

,

Approved by:

- [

Y!M [

n

/

H. C. Da~nce,'Section Chief

Dite S'igned

Division of Reactor Projects

SUMMARY

Scope:

This routine on-site inspection involved a review of monthly

surveillance observation, monthly maintenance observation, operational safety

verification, engineered safety system inspection, radiological protection

program and physical security program.

Results:

No violations or deviations were identified,

i

l

l

l

l

8804060267 880328

[

PDR

ADOCK 05000348

,

[

R

tErcSS

._

. _-_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _

_ .______-___ __ ____

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

__

_ _ _ _ _

- _ _ .

-

.

.

,

k

.

.

REPORT DETAILS

1.

Licensee Employees Contacted

J. D. Woodard, General Plant Manager

D. N. Morey, Assistant General Plant Manager

W. D. Shipman, Assistant General Plant Manager

R. D. Hill, Operations Manager

C. D. Nesbitt, Technical Manager

R. G. Berryhill, Systems Performance and Planning Manager

J. J. Thomas, Maintenance Manager

J. K. Osterholtz, Unit Supervisor, Administrative

L. W. Enfinger, Administrative Manager

J. E. Odom, Operations Unit Supervisor

B. W. Vanlandingham, Operations Unit Supervisor

T., H. Esteve, Planning Supervisor

J. B. Hudspeth, Document Control Supervisor

L. K. Jones, Material Supervisor

R. H. Marlow, Technical Supervisor

L. M. Stinson, Plant Modification Manager

Scott Fulmer, Supervisor, Safety Audit Engineering Review

Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operations

personnel, maintenance end I&C personnel, security force members, and

office personnel.

2.

Exit Interview

The inspection scope and findings were summarized during management

interviews throughout the report period and on March 14, 1988, with the

plant manager and selected members of his staff. The inspection findings

were discussed in detail.

The licensee acknowledged the inspection

findings and did not identify as proprietary any material reviewed by the

inspection during this inspection.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (92702)

This area was not inspected.

4

Monthly Surveillance Observation (61726)

The inspectors observed and reviewed Technical Specification (TS) required

surveillance testing and verified that testing was performed in accordance

with adequate procedures, test instrumentation was calibrated, lim' ting

conditions for operation (LCO) were met, test results met acceptance

criteria and were reviewed by personnel other than the individual

directing the test, deficiencies identified during the testing were

.

_ _ _ _ _ _

.

'

.

'

2

properly reviewed and resolved by appropriate management personnel, and

personnel conducting the test were qualified.

Portions of the following

test activities were observed or reviewed by the inspectors:

2-STP-11.9

RHR Pump 2A Monthly Operability Check.

2-STP-20.1

Penetration Room Filtration Alignment Verification.

1-STP-22.18 Auxiliary Feedwater Automatic Valve Position Verification.

1-STP-121

Incore/Excore Detector Calibration.

2-STP-33.2A Reactor Trip Breaker "A" Operability Test.

2-STP-47.0

Miscellaneous Valves Inservice Test.

0-STP-80.1

Diesel Generator 1-2A Operability Test.

0-STP-80.2

Diesel Generator 1C Operability Test.

2-STP-617.0 Penetr ation Room Filtration System Heater Test.

No violations or deviations were identified.

5.

Monthly Maintenance Observation (62703)

Station maintenance activities of safety-related systems and components

were observed / reviewed to ascertain that they were conducted in accordance

with approved procedures, regulatory guides, industry codes and standards,

and were in conformance with TS.

Items considered during the review

included: verification that limiting conditions for operations were met

while components or systems were removed from service; approvals were

obtained prior to initiating the work; approved procedures were used;

completed work was inspected as applicable; functional testing and/or

calibrations were performed prior to returning components or systems to

service; quality control records we e maintained; activities were

accomplished by qualified personnel; parts and materials were properly

certified;

and,

radiological

and

fire

prevention controls

were

implemented. Work requests were also reviewed to determine the status of

outstanding jobs to assure that priority was assigned to safety-related

equipment maintenance which may affect system performance.

The following

maintenance activities were observed / reviewed:

KdR 116046A

Repair fuel pump Leak on Diesel Generator 18.

KWR 119228

Terminate cable for Diesel Generator 1-2A lube oil heater.

KWR 138284

Replace 2" service water piping to RHR Train A MCC-2A room

coolers.

KdR 138286

Replace 2" service water piping to MCC-2A room coolers.

---

.

.

l

3

'

.

MWR 161626

Install pressure switch for breathing air system.

MWR 163515

Test reactor trip breaker 2A.

0-GM-7.0

Insulation resistance testing for rotating equipment (air

compressors A and B and auxiliary jacket water pump for

Diesel Generator 1-2A).

i

0-MP-12.2

Diesel Air Intake and Exhaust Valve Visual Inspection

f

(diesel V-B) Colt Model DC-2V Diesel Engine 1B, 18 Month

Inspection.

0-MP-14.1

Colt Model DC-2V Diesel Engine IB, 18 Month Inspection.

0-MP-14.6

Model DC-2V Diesel Generator Engine IB, Quarterly

Inspection.

0-Mp-28.114

Inspection and Testing of Reactor Trip Breakers (breaker

for 2A).

2-IMP-259.2

P-4 Permissive Contact Verification (Unit 2 "A" train).

No violations or deviations were identified.

6.

Operational Safety Verification (71707)

The inspectors observed control room operations, reviewed applicable logs

and conducted discussions with control room operators during the report

period.

'lso, the operability of selected emergency systems was verified,

.

tagout records were reviewed and proper return to service of affected

components was verified.

Tours of the auxiliary building, diesel

building, turbine building and service water structure were conducted to

observe plant equipment conditions, including fluid leaks and excessive

vibrations and general housekeeping efforts.

The inspectors verified

compliance with selected limiting condition for operation (LCO) and

results of selected surveillance tests.

The

verifications were

accomplished by direct observation of monitoring instrumentation, valve

positions, switch positions, accessible hydraulic snubbers, and review of

completed logs, records, and chemistry results. The licensee's compliance

with LCO action statements were reviewed as events occurred.

The inspectors routinely attended meetings with certain licensee

management and observed various shif t turnovers between shif t supervisor,

shift foremen and licensed operators,

These meetings and discussions

provided a daily status of plant operations, maintenance, and testing

activities in progress, as well as discussions of significant problems.

On March 3,1988, the licensee notified the NRC resident inspectors that

an accumulation of gas had been discovered in the piping of the "A" trains

on Units 1 and 7 in the RHR discharge to the charging pumps suction

piping.

This gas was analyzeo and was found to contain the same

_ _

_________ __ . _ _ _

-

.

. .

.

4

composition of H2 volume control tank overpressure of hydrogen. The RHR

to charging pump suction is used during the recirculation phase during

accident conditions. The licensee vented the gas from Unit 1 "A" train on

February 26, 1988. The amount of gas vented was equivalent to 450 gallons

of water.

No gas was found on Unit 1 "B"

train.

Unit 2 "A" train was

vented on February 29, 1988.

The equivalent of 310 gallons of gas was

removed. No gas was found on "B" train. Successive venting was conducted

s:

on March 1 and 2 with decreasing amounts of gas accumulation.

The

licensee went to a 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> venting schedule and no more accumulation of gas

was found. The immediate concern was the safety significance in regard to

the high pressure charging pump operation during accident conditions. The

licensee

contacted Westinghouse Corporation and was

informed by

Westinghouse and Pacific Pump (Manufacturer) that the gas volume be

limited to less than 6 cubic feet. However, the licensee has initiated a

program to not allow any gas build up.

This program consists of regular

venting and charging pump operation which will preclude the gas buildup.

The licensee is investigating certain modifications and alternatives as a

,

permanent fix to the gas accumulation.

For further information refer to

Inspection Report No. 348-364/88-05.

No violations or deviations were identified.

7.

Radiological Protection Program (71709)

Selected activities of the licensee's Radiological Protection Program were

reviewed by the inspectors to verify conformance with plant procedures and

NRC regulatory requirement. The areas reviewed included:

organization

and management

of

the

plant's

health

physics

staff,

" A LARA"

implementation, Radiation Work Permits (RWP's) for compliance to plant

procedures, personnel exposure records, observation of work and personnel

in radiation areas to verify compliacce to radiation protection

procedures, and control of radioactive ma:erials.

No violations or deviations were identified.

8.

Physical Security Program (71SSI)

Licensee's compliance to the approved security plan was reviewed by the

inspectors.

The inspectors verified by observation and interviews with

security force r?mbers that measures taken to assure the physical

protection of the facility met current requirements.

Areas inspected

included:

organization of the security force,

establishment and

maintenance of gates, doors, and isolation zones, access control, and

i

badging procedures.

I

No violations or deviations were identified.

'

l

l

-

l

i

_-.

__

- - . _ _ - _ . . _ - _ . . . _ - . - _ . _ _ _ . _ _ .

, , _ . . _ . _ ~ ,

,_.._., , _

_

- - , _ . _

-

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

-

.

. .

,

S

.

9.

Engineered Safety Systems Inspections (71710)

The inspectors performed inspections of portions of various safety related

systems during this inspection period. Major components were checked for

leakage and any general conditions that would degrade performance or

prevent fulfillment of functional requirements.

The following Unit 2 systems were inspected in detail:

Auxiliary Building Ventilation System.

Penetration Rooms Filtration System.

Containment spray System Including Chemical Additive System.

Residual Heat Removal System.

Items inspected included: confirmation that licensee's system line-up

procedures matched plant drawings; surveillance procedures included the

surveillance requirements of the Technical specifications; system valves

and electrical

breakers were in correct alignment or position;

instrumentation was inservice and calibration was current; hangers and

supports were aligned and in service; equipment was properly labeled; and,

general housekeeping and cleanliness were properly maintained.

The components inspected were found inservice / operable or if not inservice

were covered by applicable "Tag Out" procedures to meet the requirements

of the TS.

,

No violations or deviations were identified.

,

i

,

[

-

-

.

.

.

-