ML20148H976
| ML20148H976 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yankee Rowe |
| Issue date: | 01/31/1974 |
| From: | Schemel R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Vandenburg D YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20148H982 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8011200226 | |
| Download: ML20148H976 (3) | |
Text
__.
1 6~
, )'
s" ' "
DSTRIWtION.1 g
3x u..
y;ta,
, ~... v
~
~
~
t
?DocketFile.j e-AC..-
~..a..
2, _., _ ;
j
.. HEC PDR ' ud RP Reading Branch Reading JAN 311974 DJSkovholt, L:0R TJCarter, L:0R Docket No. 56-29 Svarga, L:RP j
ACRS (16)
RO (3)
MKaufmann, OGC RJSchemel, L:0RB#1 Tankas Atomic Electric Company ABurger, L:0RB#1 ATTMs Donald E. Vandenburgh SATeets, L:0RBil i
Tise President SKari, L:RP 20 Turnpike Esad TPFlood, L:0RBf1
~
Umstboro, Mass =*b==tts 01581 RVanNiel, L:0LB WHouston, L:0LB Centlemens We have reviewed Yankee's Physical Seemrity Flan for the T==1rma Nucisar Power Station which you submitted with your letter dated Useember 31, 1973. This docessant is befag withheld from public disclomare perssant to Sectica 2.790 of 10 CFR Part 2.
We find that in order for your plan to be in conformance with the Regulatory position in Regulatory Guide 1.17 of June 1973, it needs to be revised to incorporate acceptable responses to the additional information identified im Attachment A to this letter.
We request that ydu.. submit within 30 days from the date of this letter your responses to our request for additional information that you will have incorporated in your revised Yankaa's Physical Security Plaa to be implemented is compliance with Sectica 73.40 of 10 CFR Part 73.
Tour' reply should request that the additional information be withheld from public disclosure persmaat to Section 2.790 of 10 CFR Part 2.
g C0b6hN sincerely, orfrinalsIgnea y p\\\\S 00 gy pgGG Robert J. Whem J p00R Q Robert J. Schemel, Chiaf Operating Beactors Branch #1 Directorate of L4*amming Enclosera Attachment A - Request for Additiemal Informatios h*
o, ric i,
L-L:0RB#1 L:0RB#1 L:0RB#1 pmel ABurger:d/d SATeets ston RJ
.u....,,
.1/25]74
_1/)(/74_,,..
,1/,,h74
.1[g,/74 oats
- Forra Af.C.)l8 (Rev. 9 53) AECM OJ40 oro cas is e i nes. i sJ o-s o4 mm 6
6
ATTAC1 DENT A REQUEST ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR TIM TANKEE PHYSICAL SECURITT PLAN YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY 1
DocEET Wo. 50-29 l
1.
Specify the size of the security fores on shift and indicate if they j
are armed.
1 2.
Are all alarms self-ehecking and tamper indlesting?
3.
State the frequency of the testing of the alarm systems.
4.
State the frequency of the testing of the commasalestion systems.
5.
Specify the constructice and height of the physical barrier.
A 6.
Provide a figure which shows the physv al barrier in relation to the ovaar controlled area and the vital areas.
7.
Provide information pertinent to the owner controlled area per ANSI N18.17, Section 3.2.
8.
Bow is vehiale assess to the protected area controlled? Show the parking facilities on the ffgare requested above.
9.
Do procedures require visitors to sign la and out and provide infor-motion as stated in ANSI N18.17, Section 3.3.2.17
- 10. Will station employees and other perseas authorised access without escort be badged?
11.
Specify the provisions for inspection and search of individuals, packages, and vehiales entertag the protected area.
12.
Speelfy the provisions for surveill - e of the protected area.
13.
Specify the provisions for the enforcement of access control to the protested area and the vital areas.
omer >
suaw4=r>
l our>
...........=.o..
form AEC-318 (Rev. 9 33) AECM 0240 e
wte 4i.63.i mn
1 -.
- 14. Who has overall responsibility for the security progrant 15.
Specify the review frequency of security procedures.
16.
Specify the frequency of the formal audit by the Nuclear Service Division.
- 17. Indicate the system established for control, dis - 4=mtion, and revision to security procedures.
- 18. Discuse the co - fcations systems provided the security force.
- 19. Will records be amistained of all tests, responses to istrusion alarms, and threats to plant securityt 1
- 20. How will the local law enforcement agenaise be used to enhanes plant security?
- 21. Disensa the physical requirements for the security force personnel.
- 22. What drills and tests are provided to check the effectiveness of the soeurity plan and proeddarest
- 23. Has lighting of the protected area been provided to permit effective visual inspection of the arest i
omet >
$URNAME >
............u,,u
,m_.
oArt >
Form AEC.31s (f.ev. 9 53) AECM 0240 o*o en-Is-s t eso.1 so-e:s
._