ML20148F337
| ML20148F337 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07002909 |
| Issue date: | 11/07/1960 |
| From: | William Jones, Jeffrey Scott ALABAMA, STATE OF, INTERIOR, DEPT. OF |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20148F312 | List: |
| References | |
| 17615, NUDOCS 8011050017 | |
| Download: ML20148F337 (100) | |
Text
O GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALA8AMA WALTER B.
JONES, STATE GE0LOGIST Information Series 21 GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF AUTAUGA COUNTY, ALABkMA A Reconnaissance Report By John C. Scott
~
Prepared by the United States Geological Survey in cooperation with the Geological Survey of Alabama
.guRVEP.
\\e\\
arv 9
4 g
s ye A
Un ive rs i ty. Al a bama 1960 0 011050d l"/
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL University, Alabama November 7, 1960 Honorable John M. Patterson Governor of Alabama Montgomery, Alabama Sir:
I have the honor to transmit herewith the manuscript of a report entitled " Ground-Water Resources of Autauga County, Alaba:na. A Reconnaissance Report" by John C. Scott, with the request that it be printed as Information Series 21 of the Geological Survey of Alabama.
Respectfully, WALTER E. JONES State Geologiat b
i CONTENTS Page Ab s t r a c t..................................
1 In t r od u c ti o n................................
2 Purpose and scope of investigation............
2 Previous investigations....................
4 Well-numbering system....................
5 A c knowle dgme nts........................
5 P hy si ca l f e a t ur e s............................
7 T o p o g r a p hy............................
7 D r a ina ge..............................
8 Geologic formations and their water-bearing properties..
8 Pre -C retace ous rocks.....................
8 C reta ceous system.......................
9 Tus caloosa gro up....................
9 Coker formation.................
9 Gordo formation.................
10 E uta w fo rmation.....................
10 S e lma gr oup.......................
10 M o o r e ville c ha lk................
10 j
Q ua te r na ry sy s t e m.......................
11 l
Terrace and alluvial deposits............
11 i
G r o u n d wa t e r...............................
11 l
Source...............................
11 Occurrence and storage....................
12
(
\\ Vater-table and artesian conditions............
14 Water-level fluctuations and their significance....
16 Movement a nd discharge...................
18 l
A q ui fe r t e s t s...........................
18 l
U s e o f wa t e r...........................
21 Qua li ty o f wa t e r.............................
23 C o nc lu s i o ns................................
24 i
Sele cte d bibliog r a phy.........................
25 j
i i
f
?
I u
i 1
l i
ILLUSTRATIONS (All plates are in pocket)
Plate 1.
Map showing locations of wells in Autauga County and areas of artesian flow.
2.
Geologic reconnaissance map of Autauga County, Ala.
3.
Subsurface stratigraphic section (A-A') from 1. 0 mile northwest of Billingsley to confluence of Pintir.11s Creek with Alabama River, Autauga County.
4.
Subsurface stratigraphic section (B-B') from ?. 7 milea south of Mulberry, Autauga County, to Euawr Station, Montgomery County.
Page Figure 1.
Map of Alabarna chowing area studied arid areas of other ground-wate r studies...............
3 2.
Diagram sh: wing.vell-numbering system used 6
in Auta uga C o unty, Ala...................
3.
Diagram showing divisions of subsurface water...
13 4.
Schematic diagram showing artesian and vater-table c onditio ns........................
15 5.
Fluctuation of water level in well R-18 tapping the Gordo formation, and monthly precipitatio::
at P rattville, Ala., 19 5 9..................
17 6
Map of the piezotnetric surface of water in de Gordo formation, Autauga County, Ala.........
19 7
Map of the piezometric surface of water in the Eutaw formation, Autauga Cour,ty, A1.2......
20 L
C.
Semilogarithmic plot of recovery da'.a obtained from aquifer te st at the site of we'.1 P-25..
22
TABLES Page r
Table 1.
Records of wells and springs in Autauga County, Ah................................
28 2.
Chemical analyses of water from selected wells i n A u ta uga C o unty, Ala...................
48 3.
Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala......
50 4.
Drillers' logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala.....
81 i
L i
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF AUTAUGA COUNTY, ALABAMA A Reconnaissance Report By John C. Scott ABSTRACT Autauga County is in south-centra 1 Alabama and is bounded by El-more, Montgomery, Lowndes, Dallas, and Chilton Counties.
It has an area of 599 square miles and, in 1950, had a population of 18,186. The county is primarily rural, the only incorporated towns being Prattville, Autaugaville, and Billingsley.
The county is in the northern part of the Coastal Plain province and is divided physiographically into the Central Pine Belt and the flood plain of the Alabama River.
The terrain is billy, ranging in altitude from about 100 feet abo /e sea level in the basin of the A'abama River in the south to almost 700 feet in the north.
The county is underlain by sedimentary deposits of Late' Creta-ceous age, which rest on a basement complex of pre-Cresceous meta-morphic and igneous rocks.
The Late Cretaceous deposits consist of the Coker and the Gordo formations of the Tuscaloosa group, the Eutaw formation, and the Mooreville chalk of the Selma group.
Terrace and alluvial deposits of Quaternary age overlie the Cretaceous rocks in and adjacent to the flood plains of the Alabama River and larger tributaries.
The chief sources of ground water are aquifers in the Coker, Gor-do, and Eutaw formations.
Water for domestic and stock use also is obtained from the terrace and alluvial deposits.
Large quantities of ground water are used in the southern par. of the county, where !10w-ing wells are common, but only sma11 quantities are used in other parts.
Yields of 300 gpm (gallons per minute) or more can be obtained from wells in the Coker and Gordo formations. Sands ia the Gordo and Eutaw formations tapped by a well near Autaugaville, based on a 24-hour pump-ing test, have a coefficient of transmissibility of about 18,000 gpd (gal-lons per day) per foot.
Ground water in Autauga County is generally soft and contains a relatively small amount of fluoride and sulfate.
In some parts of the
2 county the water contains an objectionable amount of iron but is other-wise suitable for most uses.
Water in the Eutaw' formation in the ex-i treme southwest corner of the county corcains as much as 592 ppm (parts per million) chloride.
INTRODUCTION Autauga County is in south-central Alabama and has an area of 599 square miles. It is bounded on the east by Elmore and Montgomery Counties, on the south by I. owndes County, on the west by Dallas Coun-ty, and on the north by Chil,on County (fig.1). The county is primarily rural, the only incorporate d towns being Prattville (the county seat),
Billingsley, and Autaugaville. The population of the county is 18,18 9, ac -
cording to the 1950 census, the eastern and souther" parts of the county being the most thickly populated.
The economy is mainly agricultural.
Prattville, known as the " Fountain City" because of the marry flow-ing wells in the area, is the center of industry in the county. Industries in the Prattville area manufacture cottongins and parts, cloth, clothing, lurnber, and poultry and pork products. One of the oldest cottoregin fac-tories in the United States has been in operation in the coun'y for more Prativille is on'/ a few miles from Montgomery and is than 100 year 2.
c becoming a re sidantial and commereir.1 suburb of trat city.
Purpose and Scope of Investigation The de aand for ground water in Alabama has greatly increased during the pact 20 yeare, and, in order to rneet this increased demand, information er the occurren c, availability, movement, and chemical r,unlitj of ground water must be obtained. The U. S. Geological Survey, in cooperation witn the Geological Survey of Alabama, is making recon-naissance ground-water investigation.3 in counties where funds for more de ailed studies are not avai'able. These studies are designed to obtain, in a relatively shortperiod of ti:ne, ger.eral information on gro=d water ard its rels. tion to the geology of an area.
This repor is the result of one of these investigations.
~
The ground-viater investigation of Autauga County was begun in July 1958 e.nd included the following:
1.
An _nventory of most drilled wells and selected dug wells and springs was mtde to determine their distribution and location, depth, 1
l l
3 IUVES TONE ((dbiEOYN JACKSON i
LAUDd5I[$
'.gM p
1
- =
W:
1. 1. lt /
-&COLBERT
- WyY,
'NW V
(
i OHEROKE MARION WINSTON CULLMAN
/~CETOWAH 4 ci BLOUN T (,- '.
,~
/
~
WALKE9 Y CALHOUNh ST CLA R;J FAYE T TE
.f LAMAR JEFFERSON ',
f TALLADEG" CLEBURNE.
't
[PICKE NS 2TUSCALOOS A SHELSY CLAY ANDOLPH r,,;
tg TALLAPOOSA GREENE f BIBB COOSA O
C HILTON CHAMBERS 4 HALE-g
)
PERRY
.h LMORE LEE SUMTER f
% faut A's.
k_
q sffw-h
'h
~
o DALLAS $
. %' T 3 ; '.' E A Yl _ __ __
'L 2 ARENGO W RUSSELL
-M j g.
ICwoC "A'N -
""t l '^^
LCW NE~C -
BULLOCK:
(
1
-Mt ;;,
,- A 1
1 Gt:thilt' 'O i.
~
1.
C "J'
'I;'"
BARBOUR j
m BUTLER
[
,m
' ' CLARKE d
i MOEE k
CRE'd-N
}
HENRY-gm y"
DALE WA;HINGTON
/ CONECUM COFFEE
/
COVINGTON \\
f
_.s ESCAVB!A HOUSTON ggggyg MOBILE in this report BALDW!N Area of sfusy >jmded O
Are a s where grna:..s er studies orc in prog r ess co.
o Ar eos where SNd es have been completed Figure I.-N op of Alabamo showing.orec studied and creas of other ground-water studies.
1
._~
4 4
i construction, yield, water level or artesian pressure, use, and the aq-uifer tapped by each.
Information was compiled for 337 wells and springs--? of which ta'p the Coker formation, 229 the Gordo formation, 91 the Eutaw forma-tion,.4 the terrace or alluvial deposits, and S tap more than one of these
' formations (table 1 and pl.1).
2.
Water levels were measured _in wells, 7here possible, and maps of the piezometric surface cf water in the Gordo and Eutaw for-mations were compiled (figs. 6 and 7). Water-leve1 measurements were made in well R-18, which taps the Gordo formation, to determine cea-sonal fluctuations and water-level trends (fig. 5).
3.
The chloride content and hardness of water samples from most wells inventoried were determined by field methods (table 1).
Water samples from 10 selected wells also were collected for more compre-hensive chemical analysis (table 2).
4.
An aquifer test at the site of well P-25, owned by the Alabama State Conservation Department Nursery at Actaugaville, was made to j....
determine the transmissibility coefficient of sands in the Gordo and Eu-taw formations (fig. 8).
5.
Data on water use and natural discharge were collected to es-timate withdrawals of ground water and the amounts of water used and wasted by continuous discharge from flowing well.a.
6.
A geciogic reconnaissance map was made to determina the dis-tribution and character of geologic formations cropping out in the count /
(pl. 2). Two geolegic sections were constructed to show the depth, thick-ness, and structure of the formations in the subsurface (pls. 3-4).
l The work was under the direct supervision of W. J. Powell, dis-l
~
trict geologist of the Ground Water Branch of the Federal Sarvey in charge of ground-water investigations in Alabama.
l Previous Investigation; 6
Information on ground water in Autauga County vu 213: pcLhhad in 1907 in Geologica1 Survey of Alabama Monagra,ch 0,
- The Odarground Water Resources of A sbama," by E. A. Smith. Smith r c:rded depthc, drillers
- logs, construction, flows, and other irdor=2ti?.: icr f i weila in the county.
i l
l l
. ~
5 Additional ground-water data were published in 1944 in " Ground-Water Resources of the Cretaceous Area of Alabama," by C. W. Carls-ton. The report includes information for 43 wells and a short summary of the geology and occurrence of ground water in the county.
Some of the wells visited by Smith and Carlston were revisited during this study, and the information is included herein.
Publications describing the geology of Autauga County include Ge-ological Survey -of Alabama Special Report 14, " Geology of Alabama, "
by G. I. Adams, Charles Butts, L. W. Stephenson, and Wythe Cooke (1926); and Geologica1 Survey of Alabama Bulletin 48, " Notes on Deposits of Selma and Ripley Age in Alabama," by Watson H. Monroe (1941). The reconnaissance geologic map in the present report (pl. 2) was prepared by the author and John G. Newton and was partly modified from an un-published geologic map prepared by Louis C. Conant and D. H. Eargle.
A selected bibliography is appended to this report listing reports, maps, and charts that contain information on the geology and ground-water resources of Autauga County.
Well-Numbering System The numbering of wells in Autauga County is based on the Federal land classification system. In this system each township, consisting of approximately 36 square miles in area, is divided into 36 sections num-bered consecutively from 1 in the northeast corner to 36 in the southeast corner. Similarly, Autauga County is divided into townships, each as-signed a letter in the same order that sections are numbered.
The re-fore, theletter A is assigned to the northeast township and the adjoining townships are designated alphabetically through W in the southwest town-ship (fig. 2).
The wells within a township are nurnbered consecutively, as are sections in a township; for example, in township A they are des-ignated A-1, A-2, A-3, etc., and in township R.
R - 1, R-2, R-3, etc.
(pl. 1).
Acknowledgments The writer is grateful to the residents of Autauga County for sup-u plying information on wells, use of water, and other data needed for the evaluation of the ground-water resources of the county.
Special thanks are given to the Acme and Jet Drilling Cos., Montgomery, Ala. ; Alex Stoudenmire Well and Supply Co., Prattville, Ala. ; B. H. Clark, Au-
J 6
'.s
.: r
.. ~
n.14 c.
m. i s,E.
- n. as E.
N
.1 s,
C B
A. T-
,G -.*..
- s t o.
(l n.la t.
- n. n C
B A
N.
....dp..,,
g' D
E F
G-H g
T.
t
!9 1
f t
M-
',1
'r.
-n.
e l
.. A'
.D
. E F
G H
ta *.i s
.s.
i
-L K
J I
M 4.
T
. ' ' ' ". i
' AUTAUGd ' COUNTY I "
- u. -
.u s
f
.M Li.
K J
l i.
..t u J.l.
' ru v-r *h U
O P
O
'Rl alt 1.s '".;
g, s
s n.
N.
O P
O R
Q
,t su e
/,.,
pVs'{
.. U f
T Si W
F.q i, s..
A T%
s_f.,
- g i u,,
is,
v d
i
=
Li I
i G-2M G
c.it.o -
3 n.i3.
o t
g c
e rn a.
, a,,
.,,t 4
3 t,.
5
.a g
T-
.a
., s i c
..i 19
<> >..~
1 N.
~
-s s
o G
G y. r...,:,,
4 R. l 5 E.
i Figure 2.-Diagram showing well-numbering system used in Autougo County, Ala.
1
~
7 taugaville, Ala. ; Brady Drilling Co., Selma, Ala. ; and Layne-Central Co., Pensacola, Fla., for supplying drillers' logs and other information on wells and for their cooperation in collecting drillcuttings and obtain-ing electric logs of wells in the county.
Acknowledgment is made to Louis C. Conant for making available his field map, notes, and other data on the surface geology of northern Autauga County.
PHYSICAL FEATURES Topography Autauga County is in the northern part of the Coastal Plain phys-lographic province, and most of the county is in the crea known as the Central Pine Belt of Alabama. The name " Fall Line Hills," in reference to the rugged hilly terrain and steep-faced canyons, also is used to de-scribe this topography, which is developed on sand ari clay beds in the Coker, Gordo, and Eutaw formations.
The northern part of the county is an area of moderate relief and ranges in altitude from 500 to 700 feet above sea level.
Most streams originate in this part of the county and drain southward to the Alabama Rive r.
The terrain in the central and southern parts of the county is rugged, consisting of southward-trending ridges, cchich are as much as 300 feet above adjacent stream valleys. The central part of the county, the outcrop area for the lower part of the Eutaw formation,is especially rugged.
Erosion in this area has formed carrjons or gullies that have nearly vertical walls as much as 70 feet high.
The hilly terrain in the southernpart of the county merges abruptly into the low terrace of the Alabama River.
This terrace extends about 6 miles north of the present channel of the river in t'.e vicinity of For-c ester' and ranges in altitude from about 150 tc 200 fee', above mean sea level.
Remnants of an older terrace of the river form high flat plains in the vicinities of Wadsworth, Mulberry, and Pine Level (pl. 2) and range in altitude from abo 2t 300 to 400 feet above sea level. Small rem-nants of this terrace also are found in other parts of the county.
i 4
)
l 1
8 Drainage Autauga County is drained primarily southward to the Alabama River by Mulberry, Buck, Little Mulberry, Ivy, Beaver, Howard, Swift, Bear, Noland, Autauga, and Bridge Creeks and-their tributaries. 'Mor-tar Creek drains the northeast corner of the county and' discharges into the Coosa River just above its confluence with the Tallapoosa River in Elmore County.
The Alabama River, which forms the southern bound-ary of Autauga County, flows southwestward. and joins the Tombigbee River to form the Mobile River, which discharges into the Gulf of Mex-
)
ico at Mobile. Most parts of the county are we2 drained except for a few f
swamp and marshland areas in the flood plain of the Alabama River.
l i
GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS AND THEIR WATER-BEARING PROPERTIES I
1 Geologic formations exposed in Autauga Cotm?/ range in age from Late Cretaceous to Recent (pl. 2). They consist of sand, gravel, sand-stone, clay, and chalk. These sedinaentary rocks are underlain by crys-4 talline rocks of undetermined age, which consist of schist, gneiss, and other metamorphic and igneous rocks.-
The surface of the crystalline-rock complex is erosional and slopes south-southwestward. Formations of Late Cre'aceous e.ge strike west-
'j northwestward, and dip gently south-southwesmard.
The Quaternary terrace deposits are alluvial in origin: they are nearly hori::ontal but have a slight' dip toward their source, the Alabama River.
j i
Pre-Cretaceous Ro.ks Crystalline rocks of pre-Cretaceous a;;e crop or, a few miles north l
of Autauga County in Chilton County and urderlie all of Autauga County i
at depths ranging from about 200 feet near the r.or-hern bounda_y of the
{
county to about 1,500 feet in the southwest corner. T'cese rocks, which are predominantly metamorphic, consist of schist, gneiss, quartzite, j
marble, and granite, and they form the basement comptex on which beds of Cretaceous age were deposited.
The erosional sur' ace of the crys-talline rocks slopes south-southwestward at 45 to 55 feet per mile in the subsurface of Autauga County. The rocks are genera!!y dense and im-l permeable and yield only small quantities of water to vfells. They are l
not a source of ground water in Autauga Count'j.
l l
l 1
t
i 9
i Cretaceous System Deposits of Late Cretaceous age cropping out in Autauga County consist, in ascending order, of the Coker and Gordo formations of the Tuscaloosa group, the Eutaw formation, and the Mooreville chalk. They strike west-northwestward and dip south-southwestward at about 30 to 45 feet per mile.
Stratigraphic sections showing the thickness, char-acter, and altitude of formations of Cretaceous age in the subsurface of Autauga County are shown on plates 3 and 4.
Tuscaloosa Group The Tuscaloosa group overlies the eroded surface of pre-Cretaceous crysalline rocks and crops out in the northern and central parts of the cound/ (pl. 2).
The group is presently subdivided into two formations, the Coker at the bottom and the Gordo at the top, which have a combined thickness of about 900 feet.
They consist of sand, gravel, clay, shale, and calcareous sands'one deposited under deltaic and shallow marine conditions.
Coker formation. --The Coker formation unconformably overlies the pre-Cre+aceous rc ks ard crops out in the vicinities of Marbury and Billingsley in the northern part of the county. In Autauga County, the Coker consists of three separate lithologic units that have a maximum combined thickness of about 625 feet in the subsurface. The basal unit, consisting of beds of sand, gravel, boulders, and varicolored clay de-posited under deltal:-type conditions, ranges in thickness from about 90 feet in the northern part of the county to about 150 feet in the south-een par. The more permeable beds of this unit are a source of ground water in the northern and central parts of the county. Wells tapping this unit should yield from 10 to 100 gpm (gallons per minute).
Tire middle uni consists chiefly of beds of well-sorted sand, fis-sile &y, and cal:c.reous sandstone of marine origin. It ranges in thick-ness from a few feet in the northern part of the county to about 400 feet in the southern part. It is a potential source of ground water in Autauga i
County, especially in the southern part where the sand beds are rela-tively thick and well sorted.
Wells tapping these beds should yield 200 gpm or more.
The upper unit of the Coker formation, consisting of deltaic sand, f
gravel, and varicolored clay, is about 50 to 75 feet thick. The sand and gravel beds are generally poorly to moderately well sorted, and are a I
i 10 source of moderate quantities of ground water in the county.
Gordo formation. --The Gordo formation unconformably overlies i
the Coker formation. The contact between the formations in the outcrop i
is generally marked by basal sand and gravel beds of the Gordo overly-i ing varicolored sandy clay of the Coker. The Gordo ranges in thickness from about 115 feet in the outcrop to more than 250 feet in the subsurface in the soChern part of the county.
It consists of beds of sand, gravel, and varicolored clay of deltaic or nonmarine origin.
The beds of sand and gravel are the principal source of water supply and yield 200 gpm or more to wells in most parts of Autauga County.
Most of the flowing wells in the county tap the Gordo; flows range from less than 1 to about 30 gpm.
j i
f Eutaw Formation t
The Eutaw formation unconformably overlies the Gordo formation and consists of gray to yellowish-brown glauconitic sand, sandy clay, j
and calcareous sandstone. It ranges in thickness from a few feet in the northern part of the county to about 400 feet in the southern part. The l- -
contact between the Gordo and the Eutaw formation is characterized by a fine-to coarse-grained slightly glauconitic sand of the Eutaw overly-ing varicolored sand) clay of the Gordo.
Because of its considerable thickness and the dip slope of the topography in the are:t., the Eutaw crops out in most of Autauga County (pl. 2). It is a potential '
rce of ground water in the central and southern parts of the county I ss not i
been extensively developed. Wells yielding 300 gpm or more h v..i sand l
beds in the Eutaw f armation probably could 'oe constructed in the south-i een part of the county.
l Selma Group i
Mooreville chalk. --The Mooreville chalk, the lovier formation of i
the Selma group, unconformably overlies the Eutaw formation; it con-I sists of light-gray to yellowish-orange chalk, calcareous silt, and fos-l siliferous calcareous sandstone and ranges in thickness from a few feet to about 100 feet in Autiuga County.
The lower part of the formation crops out in outliers or noses in the southern part of Autauga County,
)
and these, for the mostpart, are capped by Quaternary terrace deposits.
l The Mooreville is extensively exposed in Lowndes County, immediately south of Autauga, where it forms the northern part of the physiographic division known as the Black Prairie or " Black Belt. " The Mooreville i
e i
l m
vi w
e
.et es in
- ~
11 is dense and relatively impermeable and is not a source of ground water in Autauga County.
Quaternary System Terrace and Alluvial Deposits Terrace and alluvial deponits of Pleistocene to Recent age'are present in and adjacent to the valleys of the Alabama River and the larg-er creeks. These deposits, consisting of yellowish-orange sand, grav-el, silt, and clay, have a maximum thickness of about 50 feet. Rem-nants of an older terrace of the Alabama River are exposed in the vicin-ities of Pine Level, Wadsworth, Autaugaville, and Mulberry. The base of this terrace is as much as 350 feet above the present charmel of the river. The base of the lowermost terrace is at an altitude of about 120 to 150 feet above sea level, or about 20 to S0 feet above the present river channel. Alluvial deposits of large creeks in the county range in thick-ness from about 5 to 30 feet. These deposits are most extensive in the valley of Mulberry Creek near the western boundary of the county. The low terrace deposits and the alluvial deposits are not differentiated on the geologic map (pl. 2).
The '.errace and alluvial deposits are in most places very perme-able, and would yield large quantities of water to wells in areas where they have a sufficient thickness of saturation.
They supply water to wells and springs for domestic use in several parts of the county but have not been developed for large-capaci:y water supplies.
Based on yields of wells constructed in similar deposits in Montgomery County (Powell and others,1957, p.15-16), yields of 300 gpm or more prob-ably could be obtained from the terrace deposits in the valley of the Ala-bama River.
Sand and gravel from these deposita are use.d extensively as road aggregate and in the manufacture of concrete, asphalt, and related prod-ucts.
GROUND WATER Source Ground water is the water that occurs in the earth's zone of sat-ura tion. The top of the saturated zone is called the water table, the po-
i I
12 sition of which is shown by the level at which water stands in nonarte-sian wells. Ground water is derived from precipitation, and in Alabama the precipitation is principally rain.
A part of the precipitation flows into streams and lakes as direct runoff, a part returns to the atmos-phere through evaporation and transpiration, and a part seeps downward through the soil and rocks to become ground water.
Water seeping downthrough the soil first enters a zone of aeration (fig. 3), which lies between the land surface and the zone of saturation.
A part of the water entering the zone of aeration is used to satisfy soil-moisture requirements, being held in this zone by molecular forces which counteract the force of gravity, and a part seeps to the water ta-ble and into the zone of saturation.
All openings in the zone of satu-ration are filled with water, and it is the water from this zone that is discharged by wells and springs.
Occurrence and Storage Ground water occupies pores, fractiu es, and solution openings in the rocks. The size, shape, and distribution of the openings control the storage and movement of ground water, and they vary considerably from place to place because of variations in rock types.
Porosity is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of open space in a rock to its total volume. The porosity is influenced by the size, shape, and arrangement of constituent particles; by the degree of sort-ing, cornpaction, and cementation of :he particles; and by the amount of frn :turing, solution, and recrystallization of the rock after its forma-tion.
The permeability of a rock is a measure of its capacity to trans-mit water.
Permeability may be expressed as a coefficient that ex-presses the rate in gallons per day at which ; tater will move through a cross section of a rock 1 foot square, under a hydraulle gradient of 1 to 1 (loss in head of 1 foot for each foot of travel of the water, whatever the direction of movement).
Clay generally has a high porosity but a low permeability because its pore spaces, though numerous, are very s mall.
Sand or gravel generally have a lower porosity than clay but a higher permeability because the open spaces are relatively large and inte rc onne cted.
Permeable rocks through which ground water moves freely enough to supply wells are called aquifers.
i I
13 l,\\Vv
. 1, f -i
.v.
4bMN FK
., s 4 r LAND SURFACE
.-Y"(, %
Belt of Soil water soll water g- /4 w
C
.o_
~ T, o
e 3 a O'
s u
O*
Intermediate Interrnediate vodose water
> u,e e
belt c o
- 9 O
O O h ">
e C
e O
L N
.J w
c.
=
u 0
C o pillory Fringe water 5
f ringe
~
x WATER TABLE y.O u
w-_
~
"o w
.=
e e
c O
C N
O O
u a
0 Ground water 4
(Phreofic water) o G
C O
N r-_m-___--.__
e.
O O
'5 O
i
~
'j internal water o x No O
I I
I I
i j
i i
t l
Figure 3.- Diagram showing divisions of subsurf ace water l
( Af te r O. E. Meinzer )
- = =. -
J a
.1 14 Water-Table and Artesian Cor ditions J
t i
The watertable is defined as the upper surface of the zone of sat-uration, except where confined by a bed of clay or other relatively im-permeable material.
Unconfined water in the zone of saturation moves slowly through the rocks in a direction determined by the slope of the water table. The water table is not a level or stationary surface. ' Variations in its shape and elevation occur as a result of such factors as the permeability and structure of the rocks, topography, withdrawal of water from wells and springs, and variations in rainfall, which affect the rate of recharge.
The artesian-pressure surface marks the level to whichwater will r
rise in a tightly cased well that penetrates a confined or artesian aq-uifer.
Both the water table and the artesian-pressure surface are re-ferred to in this report as the. piezometric surface, which was defined by Meinzer (1923b, p. 38) to be the imaginary surface that everywhere coincides with the static level of the water in the aquifer.
An artesian aquifer is generally confined above and below by rel-atively impermeable beds such as clay or shale (fig. 4). Water derived l
from rainfall and runoff seeps into the outcrop of the aquifer and per-colates downgradient, where it is confined under hydrostatic pressure.
This pressure is the result of the weight of the water in the aquifer and the weight of the overlying beds. Water in a well penetrating the con-fining layer will rise to a height equal to the hydrostatic head at that point in the aquifer. Such a well is referred to as artecian, whether or 4
I not it flows at the land surface.
Ground we.ter is under both wa';er-table and artesian conditions in Autauga County. Water-table condit.lons prevail in the areas of ter race r
and alluvial deposits and in the out:: rop area of the Coker, Gordo, and Eutaw formations.
Sand and gravel beds yield water to many shallow dug and driven wells in :hese areas, Artesian conditions prevail in Autauga County downdip from the outcrops of the Gordo, Coker, and Eutaw formations, where water in beds of sand and gravel is confined by relatively impermeable beds of clay. Most of the flowing wells in the county are developed in the Coker and Gordo formations. Wells flow in areas of low elevation, such as the flood plain of the Alabama River and the valleys of the larger tributar-ie s.
.m.
21
////[// //
/ /.
INTAKE AREA FOR
/
?
I //, /
/,; ':-,I w I
/l/ p:. /j'W' I
w sA 0
E ;;
E
/
n
- y
,2 j
l
/.;
3 o
5-g-
/
l f....
a
.o j
.. j
.l:.
~
o b
=
- g l
- .']- l -ll. ' '
,.l l
a c.
=a 5'
E 9-
}
.:.. Y :I:
- n':
?.. - )
o 3w
!j l.:,.Qy "
y g
F LOWING AR TESI AN W ELL 3
S3 I ~;l.i. A g v.
l I-R v
.. - r- :
~
5*
- 2
.l
-*: n
- r a
'..z
[ lll' ' '*
s.:n a
8 y
m,.
.. o a-s t
l.:i. m l.
o g
m
- ' -Q N o
/
I.,.r' S k O
l m
a H
l I.
a 0-2 e
a,
-f 5'
WATER-TABLE WELL
..f....
01 O
c
..a
- o
[
3 o
D-
[.;. m -
g-o a
\\
. :. n.
, a g
- E g o 2
a
'l G
A E:
- .
- ; gm '
o
- f l
- i. ~ ;l' :
1 l
...i
- ;l l
.-l :. -
FLOWING ARTESIAN WELL
a a
5-
).:.
l,. ;:l; E
=
~
\\
j..,7 g
o
, n X?
.o
.l-
\\
I J
SEEPS a
~
- e. g O
a a r-f "j
.C STREAM 3
- l. - /
e 8
S E E PS
~*
/
3 O
o.
o l
5 8
e.
.::. ll.
..,<.)::.. a c.
=
.s
{
NON F LOWIN G W E LL e
y E
- l. ' ;
o n
c e
91
d 1
i 16 Flowing wells are develope,d in the Eutaw formation in the s ities of Prattville in the southeastern part of the county and States
.e in the southwestern part. Flows of wells in Autauga County rz nge from less than 1 to about 30 gpm.
The area of artesian flow is shown on
[
plate 1.
Water-Levd1 Fluctuations and Their Significance Water-level fluctuations generally canbe correlated with recharge or lack of recharge to ground-water rebervoira, withdrawals by pump-4 ing, flows from wells and springs, variations in atmospheric pressure, ocean and earth tides, and earthquakes.
i Fluctuations of water levels in shallow welic in Autauga County are, for the most part, seasonal or cyclic and are related directly to precipitation.
The water levels are highest in early spring because of j
the continuous and large amount of recharge from the heavy winter rains and the low evaporation rate. Water levels are generally lowest during late autumn or early winter. Normally the water table begins a gradual rise during the latter part of November and continues to rise until late February or March. Water levelo decline throughout the mimmer except for intermittent rises caused by unusually heavy summer raina. Water levels in the shallow aquifers in the county have declined gradually for many years, and many dug wella have been deepened or replaced by deeper drilled wells during the past 10 years in order to obtain suffi-cient supplies of water.
The effect of precipitation on waterlevels in artecianwells devel-oped in the Coker, Gordo, and Eutaw formation 0 may lag from days to months.
In some wello the water levels cannot be correlated directly with precipitation because the recharge effect is obscured by ground-water withdrawal or natural discharge during the lag period.
Periodic water-level measurements were made in well R-13, re-portedly constructed in sand and gravel of the Gordo formation, at the farm of William E. Matthews near Prattville.
Fluctuations in water 1evel in this well during 1959 reflect recharge (fig. 5).
Pumpage from nearby well R-19 also affects the water level in well R -18.
.m
n4 F C
,)
~
3 e
3
\\ j.
-. ___ J g
_.__ ]
... o L
TfL vr
~
r**
. u.
.m-,
.e xt m,
ou u,rt.
ocioo.
,,o, t,,<.
atti.ot.
Figure 5.- Fluctuation of water level in well R-18 topping the Gordo formation, and monthly precipitation at Pra ttville, Ala.,1959.
l l
w
18 Movement and Discharge Figures 6 and 7 are piezometric maps of water in the Gordo and Eutaw formations, respectively. They show by contour lines the general water levels in wells tapping these formations and direction of movement of ground water.
The water moves from places where the piezcmetric surface is high toward places where it is low, in the direction of the steepest gradient, ' which is at right angles to th'e contours.
The maps l.
indicate that the altitude of the water surface is highest in the northern part of the county and that ground water in both formations moves gen-erally southward and locally toward larger creek valleys in some parts of the county. The southward movement is generally parallel to the dip of the beds; the movement toward the creek valleys is caused by the in-creased hydraulic gradient in the vicinity of the creeks where they are incised into the aquifers, thereby creating effluent seepage from the for-mation into the stream.
This seepage, common in Au'auga County, is responsible for the continuous flow of some of the creeks during dry periods. The town of Jones, in the western part of the county, is famous for its many springs, wnich issue from the basal sand beds of the Eutaw formation that have been incised by Mulberry Creek.
Clay beds in the underlying Gordo formation prevent the water from seeping downward.
Large quantities of ground stater are discharged from aquifers in the county by flowing wells.
Flov ing wells can be constructed in many parts of the county, but they are concentrated in the vicinities of Pratt-ville, Forester, Autaugaville, Statesville, and Joner. The combined dis-charge from all flowing wells in the county is estimated to be greater than 1 million gpd (gallor.s per day). Of this, it is ectimated that almost 1 million gallons is wasted. This quantity of water would supply the city of Prattville, whose average daily ground-water use is about a million gallons.
Aquifer Test:.
Much inforraation on the behavior of wells and concerning the hy-drologic properties of aquifers can be determined from aquifer tests.
An aquifer test is made by measuring the rate of dra vdown of the water level in a discharging cre11 or in one or more observation wells.
The discharge is maintained at a uniform rate for the duration of the test, which may extend for hours or days, depending on the geologic and hy-drologic conditions.
Ordinarily, the test is continued until the water level in the well is declining at a very slow rate.
After the discharge
1 1
i
-.l)
._ _ _[.
U 3h '
,) U _.
. y.'
-- r,-y)- b, -
- s. G y.- ' i Ij g.p <, f-
.. r-r- ' ! -
g {-
pl ; y$, &}J e.' k._4 3_.. _
il f
I t!g.
/
..lN t
(.5,
.*a y -
r z%/
e g
e Y h:.. __
- ff '.
,l
,l b
- i l
. ~,.
\\;.9
{ p' s
M % h O M 2 % d,8, > i) p_-..-_.
rs
- y.,
Y
!*' ' i_ N k d/
\\
A 3
hr WM, s
l.a m' a
j n : k; zw i
4 j.A.L...i.Y % Q' +'^J b y).
x
-Q k
?'
5 M
- byT9 i
, f\\,e ;
, f.g ',J i i -
y ;
_m,._ ', ; /L s-p, ml g.#pe..
\\_.
Y 1
' i.
o i
i
,g i
M I
1 a
u g's. n F,M 'D E Aif.$o!
m zu m,w i'm i llaj I
d,y.
t s N
'iD,r 4 7
h,._2w.!
se s
'_i j _t i
5
~
- ~~'
I L'
+
n.n er,
N a-m
),'m wK.ib, A r iv gr r
p
,_s.
__.y):
- m.. '....,..
M t,
'\\ C.A..cLo, G
5 TP%~1 :
i t
/ e N
't i
,r
-- %v.7 i
.e 4.. W e-
. u.i n
Q
, x-' e,9 e~
-o
", ~c MA L-
, ' -m.-b
,, ipa.
y, v y w
e 4
g
-i
_. 7
! v; ul 1,-
.gr o &m -::
t yi
,i; j /...
j 'yw) wAt.
/
e
\\
i
\\
~
1; /.'
)
I'
[k.
.,I
~-
i j
- -. s...y (
1 G
V li
~
jy)/\\.
?
i y,
g.. u u..... jj m y -[- -["s
'~
g
!I j
y
- v
- g ig 11l j
i l
ir L[ f f,.
m i.!,,
! ; i.
e 3
i t !.! l al, n : 1
, i., u i s ! i ',
i i
i.
- i 'i J.
I j,!. f.'(!l.
f
'i i
?
{ y,l,l i k.j
- 'II 1 :; e d
a e
I;
!j: 3 !
Il
). /
!I 8
.5 a
i
ta0n13
,,g A19603
,gg e 2.
ngd I
8 k> -.b.
g.s l.g_g %g.f7 n
q g
i j
- k. ir f(q
,,n.
p; i.d h* hhp $,-r.pgr-f q-t i
. J
.u.
w (r
h(
d f..ifIdK..ih.,p <pif*fGlA,PJh(__Q.--..
L o
%: 4
. y M8
%.L~i
,1 l
n
. -j _k ii
~
~
A p x.,..j] M, # ;J g
_a_ { % t L p w m :
3
..gsi s m-r. y --
g
_.y L
. 4'
_..- 4 g...__..
4..,,,ma2 i
i 3
h q,,/ pI a
V ll d VI d"r-t'"X. /
vjii_f si; 3i sl+t i
n_
id
_L q _ A;, _
_~
w r
e--a _q; g; m
.,g;y
.gq
( _1.7 N.! w. z.k-; b q
_c ; 5 i
N
...a a
L[
f'*f{
kg~.h !
~
'l
_ T[
__Q
/
A_,p"..sp 3, Q, 7_ Y_ -,l y
' L L i
i.
_.m, d '_ 8,L A l N.
.f i
'imiY1 -J
'" [
f i
! A (W_, 4'flyIrsMtj
,1,l)%j___<
]a :Y.7k.. k Q !9 $d ' ;
j 2
5 0
khhk.,._.Ehd C_l![.h e f.
! A_ 3O [ -
a I P A.-A,1
/
_k. byk,,
e r
-3.
f M",,
N-]+e
~
) A ' An l w.
v w
I.:
s c a
f~ ~\\
.1
,.4,_R f., I^ s 22.2:n....
}S V;
'~
_ q _ Oy @"'1,., < m....
- ~
g' a
rwhr
- r P
.-N
- l I
I jg i
jj eI I I 4 i l,1 i i.ii
~
i i
' l l i! i :!n = 1 s
- ,3 is
- 't y i i
fI e{ @{ Ii I T{l I )*
- I 11
= ; ;t
!al.l.1 I!-
{ : :
s,
=%.b
-'-1
-m-
l 21 is stopped, water-level measurements are made in a similar manner to determine the rate of recovery.
Information obtained from an aquifer test includes the specific capacity of the well and the coefficient of trans-missibility of the producing aquifer.
The specific capacity of a wellis its rate of yield per unit measurement of drawdown and is commonly ex-pressed in gallons per minute per foot of drawdown.
The coefficient of transmissibility is usually expressed as the amount of water in gallons per day that moves through a strip of the aquifer 1 foot wide extending
[
the full height of the aquifer under unit hydraulic gradient, or through a section of the aquifer 1 mile wide under a hydraulic gradient of 1 foot per mile.
An aquifer test was made on well P-25 at the Autaugaville State Nursery in March 1959.
The well, tapping sands in the Gordo and Eu-taw formations, was pumped at the rate of 220 gpm for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. Water levels were measured periodically during the test to determine the draw-down in the pumping well and nearby well P-2 3 Water levels were measured for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after the aquifer test to determine the rate of water-level recovery.
The results of this test, shown on figure 8, in-dicate a cpecific capacity of 2.18 gpm per foot, and a coefficient of trans-missibility of 18,000 gpd per foot.
Uce of Water Ground water in the county is used mainly for domectic and stock supplies, but in places it is uced also for municipal, industrial, irri-gation, and achool supplies. The wells of hegest capacity in the county are those owned by the city of Prattville (R-38 and R-40), the Autauga-ville State Nurcery (P-25 and P-26), and the Whittaler farm '(R-53).
The wells owned by the Autaugaville Nursery and the Whittaker farm are,
used for irrigation. The estimated maximum ground-water withdrawalc for all purposec in 1959, in gallons per day, were as follows:
Domestic and stock 800,000 R ura l s c hools..................
130,000 Irriga tio n.....................
1,600,000 City o f Pra ttville................
1,250,000 Ind us tr ia l.....................
500,000 Natural flow from well-1,000,000 l
T o ta l....................
5,280.000
NN
- - "waag O1g0w2 u aTHwa j wJ E F
I 1
i 4
2 c
a 6
2 O
B F
igu re i
8
~~
S e
O r
m i
=
=
s,o ol P
i 2
u
,s s
g m
o 4
- , c a
pi o
o ri g
n
(%
N t
a h
rd r
m
/
c
,e
.n M
S c
t i
/
s p
i f
-j f
n
/
s l
g
,)
f t
=
a o
ot o
t i
T T
o I
M n
o s
M I
f
.E,E 2
p r
e s
4 r*
I NI r
e N
c m
o i
s M M 2
n v
2 I
I e
l u
N N
o t
U U
e r
T T
y O
E E
e
,S.S n
d o
a t
1.y oi I
S I
g I
S to N
N y
c C
C y
o b
l E
E o
c e
N
?
P c
P i
c
\\
.i U
U M
n M
P e
N!
P I
d N
G N
G f
O
%I r
S o
', ( w.).
T B
m O
E o
1
\\lf 1 P G
3 0P A
E 0
N 7r D
q ui s/)
f e
r tes t
a t
t h
e s
i te o
f w
el l
P 2
0 5
0 0
l lj l1ll il,.
23 QUALlTY OF WATER Water that falls as rain.or snow contains only small quantities of dissolve'd mineralmatter, but upon reaching the ground it begins to dis-solve minerals from the soil and rocks.
The. amount and kind of min-erals dissolved in ground water varies greatly from place to place, de-pending upon such factors as the amount and type of organic materialin the soil, the type of rocks through or over which the water moves,. the length of time the water is in contact with the soil and rocks, and the t:mperature of the water.
Some rocks contain rather soluble calts, and, as a result, water pascing through or over them will become highly mineralized. Other rocks contain relatively insoluble mineralc, and the water passing through or over them will dissolve relatively amall a-mounts of mineral matter.
Nearly all ground water containc calcium because it is readily dissolved from deposits of limestone, gypsum, dol-omite, and other calcareous rocks. Other constituents common in ground water are sodium, potassium, magnesium, iron, manganece, bicar-bonate, sulfate, chloride, fluoride, nitrate, and silica.
The chemical character of water may restrict its use for munici-pal, industrial, domeatic, or irrigation supplies. Water-quality toler-ances beyond which water i: not cuitable for a particular purpose are not easily defined; however, water for municipal and domectic cuppliea should, irsofar ac possible, ~onform to the :tandards recommended by the United Statec Public Health Service (1949. According to these stand-ards, iron and manganece together should not exceed O. 3 ppm (part per million); magnesium should not exceed 125 ppm; sulfate chould not ex-ceed 250 ppm; chloride should not exceed 250 ppm; fluoride must not exceed 1. 5 ppm; and dissolved solids preferably should not exceed 500 ppm.
If water conforming to these standards is not available, water containing dissolved colide of ao much au 1,000 ppm may be used for public supply.
Fluoride in drinking water in excess of 1. 5 ppm may cause mottled enamel of children's teeth if the water is used during the period of calcification of the teeth--that is, roughly dur.ing the first S to f' years of life (Dean and others, 1942).
Excessive hardneas is an un-desirable quality of water for domestic and industrial use, becauce hard water increases soap consumption and deposito scale in pipes, heating equipment and boilers.
The hardness and chloride content of water from most well in-ventoried were determined by field analysis (table 1).
The results of more comprehensive chemical analysis of water from 12 selected wells and springs used for industrial, Irrigation, school, and domestic sup-plies in Autauga County and for P nearby wells in Montgomery County
24 are given in table 2..
The analyses indicate that ground water of good quality can be ob-tained in most sections of the county.
The chloride content of water from all aquifers is low except in the extreme southwest corner of the county, where water from the Eutaw formation contains as much as 592 ppm of chloride.
Locally, excessive amounts of iron are present in water in'the Gordo and Eutaw formations.
The analysec indicate that iron in water from the.Gordo formation ranges from 0. 01 to 0,32 ppm, and ave, rages about 0.10 ppm; iron in water from the Eutaw formation ranges from
- 0. 04 to 3. 4 ppm; the median is about O.12 ppm.
The water sampling was insufficient to determine the iron content of water in the Coker for-mation and the alluvial and terrace deposits; however, based ~on well owners' reports of stained porcelain and clothing, the iron content is probably excessive in some areas.
Ground water in Autauga County is generally soft. Water from the Coker formation ranges in hardness from s to 94 ppm and averages about 50 ppm; vtater from the Gordo formation ranges from 2 to 132 ppm, and averages about 25 ppm; and water from the Eutaw formation ranges from 6 to 278 ppm, and averages about 50 ppm.
The fluoride content of water frora all aquifers, except locally from the Eutaw, is low, ranging from 0.1 to 2. 8 ppm and averaging about O. 3 ppm.
CONCLUSIONS The resulta of the reconnaissance of groundwater of Autauga Coun-ty lead to the following conclusions:
1.
Autauga County is underlain by aedimentary deposits of sand, gravel, calcareous sandstone, clay, and chalk ranging in age from Cate Cretaceous to Recent. The Late Cretaceous deposits consist of the Co-ker and Gordo formations of the Tu :caloosa group, the Eutaw formation, and the Mooreville chalk of the Selma group.
These formations dip south-southwestward at 30 to 45 feet per mile and have a combined thick-nesu of more than 1,500 feet in the southwestern part of the county.
Terrace and alluvial deposits of Pleistocene to Recent age are distrib-uted in and adjacent to the floodplain of the Alabama River and its major tributa rie s. Remnants of river terrace deposits also are present in the 1
l
25 vicinities of Pine Level, Prattmont, Wadsworth, Autaugaville, and Mul-berry.
2.
The principal sources of ground water in the county are drill-
,ed or bored wells tapping sand and gravel beds in the Coker, Gordo, and Eutaw formations. These wells range is diameter from 2 to 16. inches and in depth from less than 100 feet to more than 800 feet. Wells tap-ping t,hese, formations flow in lowland areas of the county, and flows of 30 gpm or more can be obtained in some places. Pumped wells in many parts of the county may yield 300 gpm or more. Wells of greatest yields tap the Coker and Gordo formations.
Moderate to large quantities of Oater als6 can be pumped from wells tapping the Eutaw formation and the terrace and alluvial deposits, where these deposits are saturated
~~
,and are of sufficient thickness.
3.
Ground water of good quality is available in almost all parts of the county.' In some parts, the water contains objectionable amounts
'foY, iron. The highest concentrations of iron are in water from the Eutaw of ma tio'n. The ground water is generally soft and contains only small amounts of chloride, fluoride, and sulfate.
SELECTED BI3LIOGRAPFI Adams, G. I., Butts, Charles, Stephenson, L. W., and Cooke, Wythe, 1926, Geology of Alabama: Alabama Geol. Survey Spec. Rept.14, 312 p.
Carlston, C. W.,1942, Flaoride in the ground water of the Cretaceous area of Alabama: A'abama Geol. Survey 3u'1. 52, 67 p.
1944, Ground-water resources of the Cretaceous area of Ala-bama: Alabarna Geol. Survey Spec. Rept.18, 203 p.
- Dean, H.
T.,
- Arnold, F.
A.,
Elvove, Elias, J ohnston, D.
C.,
and Short, E. M.,194 2, Domestic water and dentalcaries: U. S. Public Health Service Repts., v. 57, no. 32, p.117 3-1177.
Eargle, D. H., 1950, Geologic map of the Selma group in eastern Ala-bama:
U. S. Geol. Survey Oil and Gas Inv. Prelim. Map 105.
1955, Stratigraphy of the outcropping Cretaceous rocks of Georgia:
U. S. Geol. Survey Bull.1014, 101 p. [1953].
l 26 Fenneman, N. M.,1938,' Physiography of eastern United States: New York and London, McGraw-Hill, 714 p.
~
Meinzer, O. E.,1923a, The occurrence of ground water in the United States, with a discussion of principles: U. S. Geol. Survey Water.-
Supply Paper 489, 321 p,-
Outline of ground-wster hydrology, with definition's:
- 1923b, U. S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Paper 494, 71 p.
Monroe, Watson H.,1941, Notes on de. posits of Selma and Ripley age in Alabama: Alabama Geol. Survey Bull. 48,150 p.
Powell, W. J., Reade, H. L., and Scott, J. C., 1957, Interim report on the geology and ground-water resources of Montgomery, Ala.,
and vicinity: Alabama Geol. Survey Inf. Ser. 3,108 p.
Smith, E. A.,1907, The underground water resources of Alabama: Ala-bama Geol. Survey Mon. 6, 388 p.
U.S. Public Health Service, 1946, Drinking water standards: Public Health Service Repts., v. 61, p. 383-384.
4 6
m
-,a, 27 1
l TABLES e9 i
l L
)
Tat >!e 4. - -He.wrd-s of wells and sprov t m Aatau;;t Coonty, Ala.
.4 on vs 11 or i.pa tae, h
- umtww currespond t.,4lwwe na plate I and taa+1r 2; AitttuJe
- Altitudes determ med by aneroid Lxtrometer.
ac. rm susN own r16.tuw.it analyaH sterett m table 2.
Method of I eit: Cy, cyttader; J, jet; N, none; T, turbane; M, manual; T y;C th..tr.11. d..r tort d.16, driva r; Du, dud; S, sprang.
C(, centrafogal or shallos -well pistoe; F, flowing well.
Deptlt of s ell. tit.t a an. levs 1: It. Ported depths twlow land surface are 1 ven IJse of water: D, domestic; N, not used; O, cbservation; P, puL4ac supply; 4
m feet; nn.twur.d tiegulus are gtu ta m feet and teistits.
S, stock; Ind, mdustraal; Irr, irryation.
- tfate r -lea e uir. u.a. Ek. Caer formatum; Kt, Gordo formathm; de, l'utaw it s tu as sun; @. h*.t terrace depw.st4; Qal, low terrace and alluvril ds pr.us..
Water levet Faeld deter manations I
g W
=0 e
G Y
E%
0 c:
-c tic 2
m
=
2 g
". d o.
.~ 2.
gE g
3 Onner Drdier is Hennarks
,g 3:
es 4 -:
aa%
j u;*E
=
c-c 3
3 C-g :*
g-ts 3%
- RI I
1 3:
ja; 6
e-oc
~C 2 n
2-5 l-Q 3
Q 2
- a b
O a:
w.
A-1
!!arry J. Morrwut.
Alex Stoudensnate Dr 270 3
Kek Cy D
4 20 Casing: 3-m. from surface to 265 ft. ; 11-bt.
screen from 265 to 270 ft.
well & Supply Co.
A-2 Mouniam Top Cafe.
. do.
Dr 275 4
Kek Cf D
4 30 Casmg: 4-in. from surface to 270 ft.; 3-m.
screen from 270 to 275 ft.
A-3 Dumtatran Clot ster Acme Drtilmg Co.
Dr 320 4
Kck Cy D
4 34 Casing: 4-in. from surface to 180 ft. ; none below.
of Saint Jude.
(?)
A-4 du.
Alex Stoudenstre Dr 97 4
Kg 597 G7 1959 Cy D
4 18 Casing: 4-an. from surface to v4 ft.; 3-an. screen from 94 to 97 ft.
~
'Nell & Supply Ca.
- A-5 Italy Chuc Minston
. do.
Dr 185 4
Kg T
P 1
8 Casing: 4 an. to 180 ft. 3-an screen Irotn 180 to School.
(?)
185 ft. YAeld reported, 50 g,wn in 1959.
A-6 J. M.1.uker Estate.
Austin Stoudenmtre Dr 465 4
Kck Cy N
A-7 A. D. Jones.
. do.
De 200 3
Kg M
D 69 4
56
(?)
A-8 J. S. Culver.
Alex Stoudenmtre Dr 220 3
Kg Cy D
4 48 Casing: 3-in. from surface to 215 ft.; 1;-in.
Well & Supply
(?)
screen from 115 to 220 ft.
Co.
A-9 Georgo Grant, Austin Stoudenmare Dr 200 3
Kg Cy D
4 64
(?)
A -10 Marbury Daptsat Alex Stoudenmars Dr 200 3
Kg Cy D
4 60 Casing-3-tr from surface to 195 ft.; 1*-an.
Charch.
Well & Supply
(?)
screen from 195 to 200 ft. Suppines church and Co.
2 homes.
A-11 Marbury IIngh Dr 180 4
Kg T
P 4
4G Supnttre 400 puptts.
School.
(?)
s-
I, A-n2 Colon Wract.
Alex Stoudenmare Dr 178 3
Kg Cy D.S 4
38 Casang: 3-an. from surface tc 175 It.:11-m.
Well & Supply screen from 175 to 178 ft.
Co.
A - 13 J. E. varner.
Du 49.6 24 Kg 536 45.4 59 J
D 11 20 Casing: 24-tm. concrete (de to 49 ft. ; none below.
D-1 Penterast School.
Du 15.4 26 Kg 671 12.0
. do.
Cf P
4 22 Casing-25-in. concrete tate.
D-2 C O Kelley.
Alen Stoudenstre Dr 144 3
Kg cy D
4 14 Casing: 3-in from surface to 141 ft.; 11-an.
Welt & Supply screen from 141 to I44 ft.
Co.
D-3 J. A. Nope r.
. do.
Dr 17 5 4
Kg Cy 8
4 16 Casing: 4-in. from surface to 173 ft.; 3-m. screen frora 170 to 175 ft.
D-4 D. B. Pearson.
C.
'#. Duntap.
Dr 180
- 4. 2 Kg Cy D
4 22 C-1 111tnker Emiate.
Du 80.9 26 Kg 571 76.0 1-15-59 M
D 66 4
26 C-2 J. D. Jews.
De L.5 26 Kg 531 14.8
. do.
J D.S 4
38 C-3 O. O. weldon.
Du 71.6 26 Kg 499 63.3 7 59 J
D,5 25 64 D-t it. C tierred.
Du 24 24 Qat 262 to 1959 Cf D
4 20 Casing: 24-in. concrete tde to 20 ft. ; none txiow.
I D-2 W.1 W111stte.
Du 39.6 24 Ke 565 34.8 5-22-59 J
Q,S i
39 52 Supplies 2 homes and stock.
(?)
D-3 Dethel Daptist De 27.8 24 Ke 517 24.9
. do.
M D
CS 11 38 Church
( ?)
D-4 New Salent Schoot.
Du 30 24 Ke 532 28 1959 J
P 65 In 28 Suppates 110 pupdm.
D-5 J. W. Thomme.
R. A. Drady.
Dr 175 4.2 Kg 200
+2 5-
-59 F
D 66 41 16 Casing: 4-in froni suaiace to t>0 ft. ; 2-in f ru.m surface to 165 ft. ; no se tactow. Estensated dis-charge,15 gpm an 1959. Supplace 2 homen.esd arrcates garden.
D-6 J. W. McCultougts.
Itadford and Son.
Dr 174 4.2 Fg 202
. t. 5
. du.
F D
65 at 20 Estunated da.c'harge, to gann in my 1959.
D. 7 Paytuu Kuig.
Alca Stoudenmaro Dr 165
- 4. 2 Kg 202
+3 5-
-59 F
D C6 Ia 38 Cassag: 4-m. from surface to 20 ft. ; 2-an. trem Well & Supply surface to 160 ft.; 2-an. screen from 4G0 to Co.
165 ft. Measured discharge,1.2 gpm on 5 26-59.
- D-8 D. M. Ps rher.
Radford and Son.
Dr 180
- 4. 2 Kg 198
.2
. do.
F D
66 2
6 Casing: 4-in. to 60 ft. ; 2-an. from surface to.70 ft.; none below. Measured discharge. 8. 6 gpm on 5-26-59.
D-9
- 11. C Rei d R. A. Brady Dr 150
- 4. 2 Kc 201
+12
.. do..
F D
66 11 14 Caaing: 4-an. to 40 ft.; 2-an. from surfare to 440 (7) ft. ; none beton. Measured duscharge, au gpen on 5-22-53.
D-40 E.
- pperson.
. do.
Dr 150 4.2 Kg 200
+12
. do.
F D
1a 14 Measured discharge, a0 gym on 5 22-59.
(7)
D-a a Southern Radroad.
. do.
Dr 3 53 3
Kg 201
+ 2. 5
. do.
F D
68 41 106 Casing: 3-in. to 350 ft. Estammted dascharge, 2 gym on 5-26-59. See dr:11er's log. Sepplacs 5 homes.
g
+e-m-
e r
w w
~
w
T
^
Table 1. -.Reenrds of welle and sprmgs an Amtaaga County, Ala. --Contsnaed
- _ -._._ r o
p l Water level Field detertainations l E
5 1
1?
=
E I
E I
og 5
5E 5?d E
2 I
owner Driller 30
+
3-M*
EE g
j
=
Remarks
,r El ca te s_
r _,
o
- t
. o r:
- s. ;.
2 e-
.a 4
l 6
.a t
- G a
2-
-E e
=
=:
23:
d 5
e a
3 x
- s s
o m
D-12 J.11. Btwkmar.
R. A. Drady.
Dr sSO 4,2 Kck 206
. B.3 5 -2C -59 F
D 67.5 11 94 Casmg: 4-in. to 100 fL ; 2-in. from 100 0 530
(?)
ft. ; none below. Measured dascharge.1.3 gpm on 5-26-59.
D-13 Jones School.
S Ke F
P 67 11 12 Measured dise harge. 3.9 gym on 5-26-59.
E-1 W. F. Cilidand.
C. W. Dunlap.
Dr 90 3
Kg J
D 4
Il Casing: 3-sa to 80 ft. ; 2-tm. screen from to to 90 ft Supplies 3 homes.
E2 Sadie CamphetL Du 61.0 30 Kg 415
- 54. 8 9-1-55 J
D 67 23 66 Casir.g: 30-ta. concrete (Jia to 60 ft.
E-3 W. F. Cdidand -
C. W. Dunlap.
Dr 60 2
Kg J
D 4
i8 Casmg: 2-in. to 50 ft.; 2-m. screen from 50 to 60 fL E-4 Transcontmental Layne-Central Dr 364 16,10 Kek 320 T
h1 68 4
98 Casing: 16-and 10-an. to 304 ft.: 10-m. screes Cas Pipe Lee.
Co.
from 304 to 364 ft. Reported yseld. 400 gym
. an 1959. See sample and electric logs.
E-5 E. E. Desson.
C. W. Dunlap.
Dr 73
- 3. 2 Kg J
D 4
14 Supplies home and swimming pool.
E-6 C1dton Turner.
Du 47.6 30 Kst 440 44.9 6-16-59 J
D.S 4
48 F-4 13dimgsley liigh Dr 210 4
Kg T
P 4
22 tappites 350 pupds.
Si huon
(?)
F2 Percey Hul.
Percey Hdi.
Du 72.5 24 Kg 312 17.6 6-16-59 J
D.S 4
38 Supplaes home sad ch2cken farm.
F-3 It. G. dpageer.
--M ims.
Du 41.1 24 Kg 435 36.7
. do.
J D.S 4
46 Casang: 24-in concrets to 40 ft.
(?)
- F-4 L.11. Dermester.
Dertley Clark.
Dr 120 3,14 Kg 195
+3 6-
-59 F
D 66 11 Measured dacharge, 5.5 gpm on 6-16-59.
Suppltes several homes.
F-5 E. E. Wyatt.
Alea S:oudenmtre Dr 323 3,2 Kg 270
- 2. 5
.. do.
F D
C8. 5 4
50 Casts.
3-ta. to 40 ft; 2-aa. from surface to Well & Supply 250 ft.; none below. Estimated discharge, Co.
less than 1 gpm an June 1959.
F-6 Camptwit and
. do.
Dr 200 3
Kg 254
+ 4
. do.
F D
66.5 4
3e Measured discharge, 6.0 gym on 6-16-59.
Moseley Can==.
G-1 D. E. Thet o.
Dr 60 4
Kg 448 2
. do..
Cf D,3 4
42 C-2 hea rvm Itarris.
C. W. Dunisp.
Dr 155 4
Kg 637 118 T-
-59 T
D 4
24 Casang: 4-in. to 143 ft; 4-an. screen from 443 to 155 ft. Reported yield,13 gym in July 1959. Sdpp1tes home and he:t-str condatacamg system 0- 3 R. E. Nelson.
Du
- 44. 5 30 Kg 606 39.6 6-22-50 J
D 25 48 e
e e
. = = = _ _ - _ - = - = _ - _ - - - _ _ - - - - _ = _ - _. - - _ - - -
i C-4 N. It. Gdiespie.
Alex Stoudenmere Dr 125 4
Kg T
D,8 Casing: 4-an. to 120 ft.; 2-in. screen from We!! & Supply (7) 120 to 125 ft.
Co.
C-5 L. Huddleston.
Dr 200 4
Kg J
D 4
22 0- 4 J. M. Donovsn..
Alex Stoudenmire Dr 102 4
Kg T
D 4
18 Casing: 4-in. to S2 ft.; 2-in. screen from S2 Well & Su;py to 102 ft.
Co.
H-1 J. F. Endress.
. do.
f'r 148 3
Kg Cy D
4 28 41 - 2 Smith Lumber Co..
Dr 160 3
Kg Cy D
H-3 Jolm J. Scott.
Acme Drdling Ca Dr 150 6
Kg Cy D
4 18 Casing: 6-An. to 130 ft.; 4-tm. screen from 130 to 150 ft.
H-4 ft. P. Csthons.
Alex Stoudenmtra Dr C
4 Kg Cy D,5 4
16 Casing: 4-in. to 137 ft.
Well & Supply Co.
H-5 J. O. Ca rrett.
Du
- 52. 6 24 Kg 514 37.2 6-26-59 J
D,8 H-S Huth M. Fleener.
H. W. Peerson.
Dr 500 4
Eck 644 107 1946 Cy D,S 4
20 Insurfacient supply. Supplements supply for home and chicken farm. Ses draller's tog.
H- ?
. do.
Alem Stoudenmara Le 265 4
Kg Cy D,S 4
18 Supplies home and 6,000 chickens.
We!! & Supply (7)
Co.
H-8 H. G. Hdt.
Jet Drtiling Co.
Dr 20J 4
Kg 645 143.7 7-6-59 Cy N Castng: 4-in. to 200 ft.; slotted from 150 to 200 ft.
H-9 J. ft. French.
Alex Stoudenmtre Dr 130 3
Kg Cy D.S 4
20 Casing: 3-in. to 126 ft.; 3-in. screen from 126 Well & Supply to 130 ft.
Co.
11-10 W. F. Cranmore.
. du.
Dr 185 3
Kg 616 Cy D
4 16 Casing: 3-An. to 175 ft.; 11-an. screen from 175 to 185 ft.
H-11 J, M. Phdlipe..
. do..
Dr 165 3
Kg 010 Cy D
4 14 Cas6ng: 3-in. to 155 ft.; 11-an. screen from 155 to 165 ft.
11-12 Liberty ll.apttet
. do..
Dr 155 3
Kg Cy D
Casing: 3-an. to 152 ft.; il-in. screen from Ct.u rch.
152 to a55 ft.
H - 13 Ma rvm C. Lee.
Janies A. Stood-Dr 147 4
Kg 616 05.2 7-2-59 T
D 4
16 Supplies 2 homes.
enm t re.
18 - 1 4 Thomas D. Punt.
Alex Stoudenmtre Dr 135 3
Kg Cy D.S 4
12 Casang: 3-in. to 130 ft.: 1*-m. screca from 130 Well & Supply to 135 ft.
Co.
!!-15 Percy D. Itoy.
. do.
Dr 175 4
Kg Cy 8
67 4
to
,Camang: 4-aa. to 145 ft.
II-to 1.co Doone.
. do.
Dr 203 3
Kg Cy D,S Casing: 3-in. to 200 ft.;
- 2-in. screen from 200 to 203 ft.
O r
6
..,.....X r
l rawe i. --Herords or.cn. and sprmes m Autauga County, Ata. --Conimued 7-
~~
j rwid determmat.ons i
water leven o
)_
i=
=
~5
=
t
_ *=
.t.
ait a
s
=
u
=
o 2
S 8
w t, j ":
o~
~=~
E-
- 8~g 7C
=E
.~*
.5
!g Bemarks Oauer Drdler 3I t5 3_
- E 3a
- $. a OE l
T l',
6g 4 u= E o
eb
- ~
E 2
=-
's E
g y
=g 3 _3 '
%g 3
2
=
3 5
a A
c is s
c a
o H
O 3:
3 s
--w,=-
r..
-e H.47 K. C. Honun.
Du 15.4 24 Kg 45a 10.2 7-8-59 J
D.S 4
20 H.18 F.
1..
- w. cat Dr 200 4
Kg Cy D
4 14 Supphes 3 homes.
(?)
H-s9 M6ffstutler-Walw rs Aten Stoudenmtre Dr 125 4
Kg 571 72.5 7-2-59 T
D 4
18 Casing-4-m. to 220 ft.; 3-an. screen from 220 Od co.
weit & hpply to 225 ft. Supplies service states.
Co.
H -20 Clifford D2sze-11 De iticy Clart.
Dr 95 3
Kg Cy D
4 18 Casang: 3-in. to 92 ft.; 11-m. screen from 92 to 95 ft.
- 11 - 2 1 P.ae Levet H.gh Alex Stoudenmare Dr 175 4
Kg Cy P
3 7
Cas u*g: 4-in. to 165 ft.; 3-an. screen from IC5 Scoto.d.
Well & Sapp!y to 175 ft. Supphes 100 pupas.
Co.
11 - 2 2 C1uites Feruuson.
. do.
Dr 87 3
Kg Cy D
4 to Casmg: 3-in. to 82 ft.; 11-m. screen fron 82 to 85 ft.
H-23 Perry D Roy C. W. Dunlap Dr 165 4
Kg 535 102.9 7 2 59 J
D.S 4
to Casmg: 4-in. to itbo it.; 3-sn. screen from 160 to 165 ft.
It-24 C. R. Cannon Aleu Stoudenmtre Dr 165 3
Kg Cy D
4 16 Casing: 3-in. to 15511. ; M-in. screen from 155 Well & Supply to 165 ft.
Co.
1-a Sant Itunt Dr 105 3
Xg Cy D
4 6
l-2 ti. H. Hoy.
Aten stuudtemtre Dr 138 4
Kr:
579 110 1959 Cy D
18 22 Casing: 4~-m. to 130 ft. Suppues 2 homes and Wolf & tiuputy store.
Co.
I-3 E. L. Turner.
. do.
Dr 145 4
4 Cy D
11 12 Casing-4-m. to 133 ft. : none below.
I-4 J. D. Athcut.
Du 21.5 30 Ke E99 14.4 4-27-59 Cf D
11 28 Suppines 2 homes. We!! has been used for more (7) than 60 years.
1-5
- 11. R. Jones.
Alex Stoudenmtre Dr 110 4
Kg Cy S
11 10 Cas mg: 4-m..o 100 ft.; 3-in. screes frorn 100 Well f Supply to ato it. Supphes 9,000 chtckens.
Co.
1-6
. do.
. do.
Dr 80 3
Kg Cy D
11 16 Casing: 3-in. to 75 ft.; it-an. screen from 75 to 80 ft.
1-7 F. ht. Tatum.
. do.
Dr 140 4
Kg Cy D,S 11 54 Casmg: 4-in, to 100 ft.; none below.
18 T.11. noy.
.. du.
Dr 140 4
Kg M
N Do.
I-9 L.11. Hunt.
. do.
Dr a60 3
Kg 500 Cy D,5 11 8
a r
m 6
1 l
l i
1 i
l i
1-a0 J. ft. Nummy.
Alex Stoudenmare Dr 125 3
Kg 480 Cy D
11 20 Wet! & Supply Co.
14a it. A. Mart m.
. do.
Dr 154 3
Kg 576 115 7-
-59 Cy D
4 16 Castng: 3-in. to 151 ft.; !{-na. screen from 151 to 154 ft.
1-12 Alvin Rnse.
Dr 185 3
Kg Cy D
al 6
Casing: 3-in. to 90 ft.; none below.
1-13 Joe Nummy.
A'em Stoudenmare Dr 210 3
Kg Cy D,5 11 6
Well & Supply Co.
1-14 Robert it. Chesnutt.
. do.
Dr 17 5 3
Kg 530 40 4-
-59 Cy D
11 6
Casing: 3-m. to 165 ft.; it-In. screen from j
165 to 175 ft. Supplies 2 homes and j
vegetable garden.
l Suppines pottery plant and home.
- 1. a 5 11 M. Ikegs.
. do.
Dr 220 3
Kg 624 180
. do.
Cy D
11 0
f Casmg:
I-. 6
. do.
. do.
Dr 220 4
Kg 618 160
. do..
Cy D
11 6
4-an. to 100 ft.
1-s7
- 14. T. Karkland.
Dr 200 3
Kg Cy D
4 12 e
a-a 8 L. C. Maanmg.
Alea Stoudenmare Dr 175 3
Kg Cy D
41 to l Casing: 3-in. to 170 ft.; none below.
Well & Supply l
Co.
1-a9 Deavers Truck Dr 200 3
Kg Cy D
11 10 Supplaes cafe and service station.
Stop.
- -20 Zeno Strana: fellow.
Jet Drittmg Co..
Dr 18G 4, 3 Kg Cy D
11 12 Cas ang: 4-and 3-in. to 186 ft. ; tower 20 ft.
l slotted.
i 1-2
- County Lmu Alca Stoudenmare Dr a50 3
Kg 540 Cy D
11 16 Christian Church.
Well & Supply Co.
1-22 M. L. Livings.
. do..
Dr 175 4
Kg Cy D
11 to Casmg: 4-in. to 165 ft. ; 3-m. screen fron sG5 to 175 ft.
1-23 Robert Wrg:ht.
Du 62.0 24 Ke 583 57.3 4-28-59 J
D ta 14 Casmg: 24-n. roncret(.de to 60 ft. Supplacs
(?)
2 homes.
1-24
- 11. I!. Ad.ams.
Dr 200 3
Kg Cy D
11 20 1-25 M. O. Itunt.
Du 63.3 30 Ke 530 56.1 4-28-59 J
D.S 46 32 Casmg: 30-in concrete tde to 60 ft. : none below.
1-26 Westwo.xt Nursery,
James A. Stouden-Dr 167 4
Kg J
D.
11 12 Casing-4-in. to 162 ft.; 3-an. screen irom 162 mire.
Irr to A67 ft. Supplaas nursery and home.
l l-27 Picamaa: Ildk Alex Stoudenmare Dr 112 3
Kg Cy D
25 12 Casing: 3-in. to 100 ft.: none below.
Dapttet Church.
Well & :iupply Co.
1 28 R. W. Carter.
. do.
Dr 177 3
Kg Cy D
11 10
(?)
Tat,1c 1. --ft. rorals of wells and sprengs in Autauga County. Ala. --Conttaued l
r
--a
.y Water level Field deterrr.madons 9
)
30 0
u l
?
"A
?,
.*t O 7 :2 5
2 I
u
" ae.
- t m
-O q
a a
w4 O
a.
Owner Drdter 30 I, -:
- O
. - - 0
.U
- 6. C 4
g 8' Rema rks 3
I
- 5 S*
O tl 3
IL *
- ~
j j$ J' e:
5 En O
2 h
EO o
4 jE ud-
- t
?
H~
- e e-.
A o
Et E*
8"
- t 5
s o
E
_a--
.. -. _ _ -.,-_.-g
.y==
==
.=.- -== _ _
t-2(J Earl Mm. u.
Alex Stoudt nmtre Dr 150 3
Ke Cy D
11 8
Wet! & Supply
(?)
Co.
a-3J George luschman.
. do.
Dr 165 3
Kg Cy D
11 18 Casing: 3-m to 160 ft.; 3-m. screen from 160 (7) to 165 ft. Supplaes nursery, swunmmg pool, and home.
1-31 S. E. Avery, J r.
James A. Stoud-Dr 125 3
Ke Cy D
18 132 Reportad yield, 3 gym m 1959. Suppites 8,000 ennure.
(?)
chickens and home.
1 32 John H. tray.
Du 57.7 30 Ke 488 47.6 9-16-58 J
D 32 92 1-33 D
L. Ya rtirough.
Alex Stoudenmare Dr 150 3
Kg Cy D
69 18 110 Well & Supply
(?)
Co.
1-34 George Itf ackmon.
. do.
Dr 146 4
Kg T
D Casing-4-m. to 139 ft.; 3-m. screen from 139 (7) to 146 ft. Suppites nursery, swimmang pool, and home.
J-a Camp Tmbtott hee Armo brdlang Dr 125 4
Kg J
D 18 6
Co.
J. 2 A. L. Ibnuvan, J r.
Alem Stoudenmare Dr 145 3
Kg Cy D
4 16 Well & Supiny Co.
J-3 As.
Dr 187 4
Kg J
D 4
12 Suppines home and heat-air conditaonmg system.
J-4 W. A. Th.rne.
. do.
De 170 3
Kg 554 80 4
-59 Cy D,8 11 12 Casing: 3-m. to 00 ft.; none below. Supplier 2 homes and stock.
J-I W. H. 1.t-o.
Dr lu2 3
Kg 548 100
.N, Cy D,S 18 8
Cas kng: 3-m. to 120 ft.; none below.
J6 K mg* tim Selsool.
Du 42 24 Kg J
D 11 14 Casing: 24-in. concrete (de to 40 ft. ; none below.
(?)
J7 M.mnt Stunt Schout.
Du 74.2 30 Ko 504 69.0 4-29-59 M
P 67 11 20 Sappines 125 pupds.
(?)
J-u D r ktge Cre cla Lod :e Aten stoudenmtre Dr 300 3
Kg 273 i
.5
. do.
F D
$6 4
4 Estimated dacharge,1 gpm on 4-29-53.
Well & Supi y d
Co.
J-9 Chartes W. Jones.
Dr 300 2
Kg 275
.5
. do.
Cf D
11 0
Casmg: 2-nn. to 235 ft.; 11-m. screen from 295 to 300 ft.
+
4 0
I
-M
~.-n.---
t' J -10 S.muel Deramus.
Alex Stoudenraars Dr ISO 3
Kg Cy D,3 11 -
8 Casing: 3-in. to 120 fL; none below.
Well & Supply Co.
J-11 Goodson Es%te.
--M ime.
Du 40 24 Kg 355 34.5 4-29-59 bt D
J -12 E. W. Murphree.
Alex Stoudenmire Dr 118 3
Kg Cy D.8 4
6 Well & Supply Co.
J-13 Otto Joace.
. do.
Dr 300 2
Kg 273
+
.8 5-1-59 Cf D
69 11 8
Estimated discharge. less than 1 gym on S-t-59.
J-14 C. M. Taylor.
.. do...
Dr 130 3
Kg 306 16 5-
-59 Cy D
4 10 Casing: 3-in. to 125 ft.: al-in. screen from 125 to a30 ft.
J-15 Upchurch Estate.
S Ke Cf D
11 to Supplies 4 homes.
(?)
J-16 J. F. Awey.
D 36.0 30 De 305 31.7 4-29-59 M
D J-17 N. B. Reynolds.
Dr 55 3
Ks 280 22 5-
-59 Cf D
to Casing: 3-in. to 55 ft. Supptres 4 homes an3 trader park.
J -18 Locust Bluft Du 31.1 30 Ks 318 26.5 S. 4 59 M
P 65 11 to Supplies 45 peptis.
School.
4 J -19 Canderell.s Motel.
Alem Stoudenstro Dr 150 4
Kg 174 10 5
-59 Cy P
67 8
Casang: 4-in. to 100 ft.; none below. Reported Well & supply Co.
yield,10 gpm in 1959. Supplies motel, cafe.
and awnmmang pool.
J-20 D. D. Faulk.
. do.
Dr 100 3
Eg Cy N
(?)
J -21 Deremus packing Austin Stouden-Dr 190 3
Yg 298 20 5-
-59 Cy Ind 4
12 Supplies mest-processing gant.
Co.
mars.
J-22 R. E. Mt!!er..
Alex Stoudenstre Dr 80 3
Ks Cy S
Well & Sopply
(?)
Co.
J-23 J. L. Horton.
. do..
Dr 96 4
Kg 255 14.2 5-4-59 J
P 4
6 Casing: 4-an. to 86 ft.; it-an. screen from 86 to 96 ft. Reported yteld, 30 gym in May 1959.
Supp'tas cals. si.rvice station, and incat me rket.
J-Z4 K. L. McClande.
Dr 77.0 3
Ke 248 13.5
. du.
Cfl D 4
20 Supplies service station and t.ome.
(?)
J.25 T. w. utenn.
De 200 4
Kg 320 58.4 5-A-59 Cy D.S 41 8
K-1 W. T. Carter.
Alca Stoudenstre De 185 3
Kg Cy D,5 11 13
- sett & Supply Ct..
K. 2
. do.
. do...
Dr 125 3
Kg Cy D
11 8
K-3 Ilardy GJes.
--Smitherman.
Du 141.0 30.34 Kg 473 134.5 6-6-60 J
D 11 34 Castng: concreta ttle sad ptsster cur atng to
(?)
140 ft.
5
l l
Table 1. --Records of wetts and sprmgs an Autauga County, Ala. --Conunued g
b Water level Facid determmatMms k
I 7E
~
u s
=
h 5
E
=
G t
g-oy C1 o gg 2
3 g
=
u o
E *-
'EC 4
g g Remarks
{
3$
M-Owner Dr:11er
,c_
3
.Rt
~**
s=
oE o
E*
~~
c u o
w-
% e
=
1 t-E 2=
nt e~
bG EO-l e
e o
S
= **
233 Bg
=
2-
=
m S
=
N 2
a s
O x
i i
-. m =.:=-.r._
- :.. c r._ _._
K-4 M. D. Carter Dr 200 3
Kg Cy D,8 11 6
K. 5 L. it Carter.
L R. Ca rte r..
Dr 48 2
Kg 473 Cy DE 4
8 Casang-2-in. to 45 ft. ; 2-in. screen from 45 to I
(7) 48 ft.
K-8 Gah Heatty Cu.
Dr 180 3
Kg Cy N
K-7 Dan Gissendanner.
Dentley Clark.
Dr 180 3
Kg Cy D
4 8
Casing: 3-ts. to 180 ft.
K-8 M.able Ca t ter.
Alex Stoudenmaru Dr 189 3
Kg Cy D,5 11 8
Casmg 3-in. to 186 ft. ; 11-m. screen from 186 Well & Supply to 189 ft.
Co.
K. 9
. du.
. do.
Dr 169 3
Kg 440 Cy D
11 10 Casing: 3.m. to 166 ft.; 11-in. screen frc,m 166 to 169 ft.
K-10 W. M. Deramus..
. do.
Dr 162 3
Kr 398 90 5-
-59 Cy' D,S 11 8
. Casing: 3-la. to 150 ft.; none bciow. Suppines home and 10,000 chickens.
K t1 ar. M. Wystt.
Dent' ey Cis..
Dr 290 2
Kg 255 9.1 5-5 ';9 Cf D
4 14 Casing: 3-in. to 280 ft.; none tr'ow.
K-12 C. R. A sk m.
. do..
Dr 293 2
Kg 200 24.6
. do.
Cf D
11 10 Do.
K -13 Frwndship 4chool..
Du 77.2 30 Ke 490 73.0
. do.
J P
11 0
Supplies 75 pupas.
K-14 perry thtes.
Dr 200 2
Kg 203
+ 4 5-
-50 F
D,3 67 11 10 Ensured static water level 15.0 ft. above sarface on 8-14 40; estimated statte water level, 4 ft. above surface on 5-5-59. Meas-ured dascharge,13.9 gpm on 8-14-40; es-tamated discharge,10 gym on 5-5-59.
L-1 6mith Farm.
Alex Stoudenmire Dr 160 3
Kg Cy D,8 11 18 Casing: 3-in, to 160 ft.
Well & Supply Co.
L. 2 W. L. Cole, Jr.
C. W. Duninp.
De 200 2
Kg 475 65 5-
-59 Cy D
11 20 Caeing: 2 in. to 195 ft.; 2-m. screen from 195 to 980 ft. Supplies 2 homes.
L-3 J. A. Rainoster.
Alex Sloudenmire Dr 220 3
Kg Cy D
4 14 Casing: 3-m. to 200 ft.; none tKlow.
Well & Supply Co.
L-4 ake.
do.
Dr 150 4
Ke 564 90 5-
-59 Cy D,5 4
12 Oasing: 4-tm. to 145 ft.; 3-m. screen from 145 to 150 ft L-5 J. T. R.Hawster.
. do.
Dr 320 4
Kg 550 Cy D,3 20 L. 8 James F. Colson.
. do.
Dr 197 3
Kg Cy D,S 11 8
Supplies hom'e and 10,000 ettackens.
a e
e g
..~
l L. 7 J. A. ftaanwater.
Alex Stoudensnire Dr 270 3
Kg Cy 3
4 16 Well & tiupply Co.
L-8 Wmalow School.
Du 28.0 30 Ke 470 21.9 5-18-59 N
N L. 9 E. C. Daw!s.
De 37.2 24 Ke 440 33.0 5-21-59 J
D 11 26 Casmg: 24-in. concrete tde to 36 ft.
M-a ft. L. Walker.
Du 63 24 Kg 331 63.3
. do.
J D
11 18 Supp16es 2 homes.
M-2 J. T. Smedley.
Radford and Son.
Dr 285 4
Kg 211 21.7
. do.
Cf D
at 28 Cas+eg: 4-in. to 280 ft.; 3-m. screen from'280 to 285 ft.
M-3 Percy Chandler.
Du 53.0 20 Ke 320 41.3 5-18-59 J
D 11 28 M-4 H. O. Smedley.
Radford and Son.
Dr 275 4
Kg 212 10 5-
-59 J
D 11 22 Casing: 4-in. to 265 ft. ; 3-in. screen Irom 265 to 275 ft.
M-5 T. J. Fulford.
. do...
Dr 350 4
Kg 193
+ 3
. do..
F D
67 11 26 Measured dacharge,17.6 gpm on 5-21-59.
Supplies home and vegetatie garden.
M-6 J.11. Druce.
. do.
Dr 310 2
Kg 180
+ 4
. do..
F D,8 67 18 46 Casing: 2-an. to 305 ft.; 2-ui. screen from 305 to 310 ft. Estimated discharge, 20 rpm on 5-21-59.
M-7 D. L. Wiwtstone.
Du 31.0 24 Ke 370 25.1 5-2 1-59 Cf D,5 11 40 N-1 Sam Eero.
Denticy Clark.
Dr 200 4
Ke 152
- 2. 0 4-24-59 Cf D
67 11 22 Measured discharge,11.4 gpm on 4-24-59.
Flows from discharge pape 2.5 ft. below top of casang.
'N - 2 feastus McLendon.
Dr 180 4
Ke 139
+ 4 4-
-50 F
D.S 70 1
33 Measured discharge, 26.7 gpm on 4.24-59.
- N-3
. do.
Cects it idiord.
Dr 150 4
K.
133
+ 1
. do.
F S
68 11 22 Estimated discharge. teas than a gym oei 4-24-59; measured discharge,19.8 gpm on 7-25-40.
N-4 C. W. Johnson.
. do.
Dr 155 4
Ke 156
+
.5 4-26-59 1
D 65 18 14 Measured discharge,1.8 gpm on 4-26-59; measured discharge, 6. 5 gym on T-25-40.
N5
. do.
. do.
Dr 155 4
Ke IC2
.5
. do.
Cf D
67 11 18 Musur:A statte we.er level, 2. 5 ft..above surface on 7-25-40; measured dacharge, 4. 4 gym on 4 24-59 Dowmg from pipe 3 ft, below top of casing; measured discharge 20.2 gt,m on 7-25-40.
N-6 C. A. Ditt mgsley.
Alex Doudenmare Dr 001 3
Ke 130
+
- 2. 5 4-24-59 F
S
- 69. 5 11 28 Casmg: 5 in. to 42 *t.: none below. Measured Welt in Supply discharge, 26.7 gpm on 4-24-59.
Co.
N-7 Itunnell Weet.
Deaticy Clark.
Lr 260 3
Ke 131
+
.3 6-4-59 Cf D,S Casmg: 3-kn. to 40 ft.; none twlow.
N. a C. w Johneun.
Dr 700 3,2 Kg 142
+ 12 4-
-50 F
D,8 11 20 O-1 Pepnn t.anctord.
Dr 42.0 30 Ke 403 2 '. 3 4-15-50 J
D 18 30
- 0- 2 G E Treadsc11.
F II. Drady.
Dr 300 4,2 Ko 364 160 4-
-59 Cy D,5 2
27 Casing: g-in. to 142 ft. ; 2-m. from 142 to 276 ft. ; 2-in. screen trom 276 to 300 ft.
2 t
V e
-,-n.-
- - ~,,, -.
n--
a Table 1. --Records of wv!14 and sprangs an Autauga County, A's. --Contmued
] Fic!J determmations j
water level 2.
I S
at it_
~
~
G t,
~
32k
,)
S 4
lg8 g
o o
a a
a k
8 U
4=a 4a 3a os 3
E LF c-Owner Drcbr 2y E
Remerks a
I E:
b.
!~s 53
$35 6
40
$5
- OS 8~
3 b
d Q
is d
3i R
H O
tc
....:.=
m 0- 3
- 11. T. UnWewood Austm stor-len-Dr 400 4
Ke 310 Cy D,5
?$
20 Ca sing: 4-sm, to 100 ft.; none below.
l Futete.
mtre.
(?)
0- 4 A. C. Iloustos.
. do.
Dr 350 4
Ke 322 60 4-
-59 Cy D.9 25 34 Setng-4-ia. to 125 ft; none below. Suppt see 3 homes and stock
.;- 5 Dells Whetstone.
. do.
Dr 350 3
Ke Cy D
40
(?)
0- 6
- 0. E. Golson.
O. E. Colson.
Dr 360 3,21 Ke 30G 60 4-
-59 J
D,3 11 18 Cc ling: 3. and 2)-in. to 350 ft.
(?)
O-7 Joe K. Clifton.
Dis 40 30 Ko 321 34
. du.
J D,8 32 40 O-8 T. F. Gober.
Dr 200 3
Ke 320 137.0 8-24-59 N
N We11 replaced by 0-9.
O-9
. do.
Watsca Drtiting Dr 350 4
Ke 320 137 8-
-59 Cy ' D Co.
O-to
- w. E. Tyue.
nadford and Son.
Dr 400 3
Ke cy D.S 4
30 Casing-3-in. to 100 R ; none below.
(?)
0-11 A. C. Itouston.
Alex Stoudenmare Dr 425 3
Ke M
N 67 18 Do.
Well & Supply Co.
G-12 J. A. Lambert.
Dr 300 4
Ke 303 M
N Casmg: 4-in. to '.'O ft. ; none below. Abandood because of hignty mineralized water.
O-13 thena Hiver Ranch.
Watson Drtilusg Dr 280 4
Ko Cy DS 4
48 Co.
O-14
. do.
. do.
Dr 440 4
Ke 320 138 6-
-59 Cy D.S 4
90 Casmg: 4-in. to 40 ft.; none below." See sample and electric logs.
O -15 C. D. W1wtutone.
Dr 350 3
Ke 150 4
4
-59 F
S 67 11 28
(?)
0-18 Da.'as River Ranch.
Dr 2
Ke 139 0
. do.
F S
S 11 34 Hessured discharge, 2.5 gym on 4-23-59.
(?)
- P-1 J. f3. Neighbors.
Alex Stoudenmire Dr 60 2
Ke 186
+
- 3. 6,3-18-59 F
6 66 1
12 Casing: 2-in. to 40 ft.; none below. Measured Well & Supply discharge,1.0 gpm on 3-18-59.
Co.
P. 2
. do.
.. do.
Dr 340 2
Kg 190
+ 2 3-
-59 F
D.S
- 66. B 4
8 Measured discharge,1.0 rpm on 3-18-59.
P-3 Whitewater Lake..
Dr 260 3
Kg 185
+ 2
. do..
F D
4 14 1
a a
r m
P. 4 C. C. Yoo german.
Dr 300 2
Kg 161
+
- 9. 0 3 59 F
D 68 11 6
Measured dise%rge, 3.0 rpm on 3-19-59.
P-5 W. R. Thompson.
Dr 300 4,3 Kg 168
,14 3-
-59 F
D,8 66.5 4
8 P. 6 W. P. Jonce..
Radford and Son.
Dr 330 4
Ke 315 90 4-
-59 Cy N
18 22 Casing: 4-in. to 220 ft.; none below. Well not an use because of caring and hghty mineral-nsed water.
P-T J
W. Plasier.
Austm stouden.
Dr 175 3
Ke 235 J
D 18 14 nire.
P-8 Maryamae Whetstone Alen StouJenm re Dr 300 2
Kg 154
+ 8 3-
-59 F
D 68 4
22 Measured discharge, 4.4 gpra on 3-19-59.
Well 8 Supply Co.
P-9 Hicks Memortal Dr 300 2
Kg F
P Sepplies 215 pupils.
School.
P 10
. do.
Dr 300 3
Kg 170 14 3-
-59 '
J P
Supplies 215 pupds. Reported to flow sten not in use.
+
- 1. 5
. do.
F D,8 64 11 to Estimated discharge, less than 1 gpm on P-11 Clarence Golson.
Austm Stoudea-Dr 390 2
Kg 152 rn tre.
3-19-59.
P-12 mmp Smith.
Alex Stoudenn3tre Dr 370 2
%c 148
+ 9
. do.
F D
69 11 10 Casang-2-in. to 320 ft.;1ower 20 ft. perforated.
Well & Supply Measured discharge, 5. a gym on 3-19-59.
Co.
P-L3 Jones Druthers Cm Leonard Carter.
Dr 320 6
Kg 150
+ 2
. du.
F D
68.5 4
to Estimated d4 charge 10 rpm on 3-19-59.
Co.
P-14 Autauga County Austan Shmden-Dr 320 2
Kg 131
+ 4
. do.
F P
69 4
12 Supplies 950 pupils.
Tramog School.
mare.
3 3-
-59 F
D 67.5 11 14 ndessured discharge,1.0 gpm on'3-26-54 P-15 R. G. 3 hanks.
Dr 300 2
Kg 159
+
, Supplies 2 l'omes.
P-16 G. C. Youngerman.
Dr 275 2]
Kg 160
+ 25 3-19-59 F
D.S 68
'll 12 Measured'dtscha rge, 5. 5 gpm on 3-19-59.'
- P-17 Crystat take R. S. Nmpson.
Dr 320 4.11 Kg 150
+ 30 1940 F
Ind 68 I
8
'Caping: 4'.ra. to 60 ft. ; t{-an. from 60 to 320 Uroom Co.
' ft. ' Measured discharge,15. 6 Epm 'on
8-17-40.
Unable to measure head or dis-charge an a959. Owner reported no decrease
'an pead or d.scharge durirg past 30 years.
Es'imited dis' charge,15jpm on 3-19-59.
P-18
. do.
Hacks Drothers.
Dr 290 4
Kg 148
+ 18
. do.
F Ind 68 11 10 t
Owner reported no decrease m head or dis-charge during past 30 years.~
P-19 Atuiu P4erson.
Dentley Clark.
Dr 350 2)
Kd 153
+ 15 3
'-59 F
D Estt' mated discharge,40 gpm'on 3-26-59.
P-20 Carl Stewart
. do.
Dr 330 2,11 Kg 159
+ 12.5 3-26-59 F
D,5
- 68 11 10 Measured der. charge,10.0 gpm on 3-26-59.
Estate.
'2 3-
-59 F
D,3 66.5 11
'. 10 Measured dmc#3srge.1. s gpm en 3-26-59.
P-2t tt G sh. inks.
Dr 320 2
Kg 158
+
P-22 C. C. Yuengernaan.
Alex itoudenmaro Dr 2CG 2
Kg 157
+ 2 2-
-59 F
D 67 11 10
' Measured statte water levet. 20.5 ft. above well 8. Supply surface on 6-17 40. Measured discharge, Jo.
1.7 gpm os 2-18-59; 3.8 gpm on 8-17-40.
- 4. 0 3-26-59 F
D.S 68 11 10" Measured discharge, 2.0 gpm on 3-26-50.
P-23
. do.
Dr 350 2
Kg 142
+
.u 4
--~
Table a. --Itecords of wells and sprange sa Autauga Cocaty, Ala. --Coattr ed Walas level Field determinstacy g
,L L
u s
m s
-g s
a t
ig
- s o
.n owner Drt11er iT I
Iu 3 *- t Ej I
I 5'. g 4
l-Remarks f
f.
3_5 $ _h 5
=.
L
.G
$Y is$
==
C 5
a 8
x a
e.
m:
P-24 M. S. Murtee..
Dr 300 2
1.g 142
+ 3.3 3
-59 F
S 69 11 to Measured discharge, 8.2 gym on 3-49-59.
P-25 Autaugavt11e State Layne-Central Dr 555 18.8 Ke 300 137.1 3-3-59 T
1re TC 11 24 Cas;ag: 18-la. to 322 ft. ; t-la. from 262 to Narsery.
Co.
Kg 555 ft.; 8-in, screes from 327 to 362 ft.,
and from 520 to 545 ft. Drawdown,103 ft. after pumpmg 120 gym for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
Irrigstes tree aersery. See sample and dr:11er's legs.
P.28
. da..
. do.
Dr 620 18,8 Ke 302 T
Art Known as well No. 2.
Reported yield 450 gym.
Kg See sample, draler's, and electr6e legs.
P-27 C. C. Youngerman.
Dr 450 2,3,4 Kg 157
+ 1 4-
-59 F
S 68 11 14 Casing-2. sad 3/4-tm. to 400 ft. : none below.
Messered discharge,1.7 gpn on 4-14-59.
S 69 4
16 Casing: 2-tm. to 400 ft.; none below. Measured P-18 1,. D. Wrtght.
Alex Stoudenmire Dr 425 2
Kg 146
+ C
. do.
F Well & Supply
.d:scharge, 4.5 gym ca 4-14-59.
Co.
P-29 G. C. Youngerman.
Dr 350 2
Kg 149
+
- 2. 5 3-
-59 F
S 68 4
to Casing: 2-aa. to 300 ft. ; acae below. Estimated discharge, less thma 1 gym on 3-26-59..
P-30 J. C. Stewart Alem stoudenstre Dr 350 2
Kg 150
+
- 2. 5 3-26-59 F
D,8 88 4
14 Measured discharge, less than i gym ca 3-26-59.
Estate.
Well & Supply Co.
Q-1 Algao Watts.
Du 40 24 Ko J
DS 18 32 Q-2 C. C. Norris.
Alem Stoudenmire Dr 200 3
Kg 224
+3 1-
-59 F
D 66 4
to Suppines 2 homes.
Well
- Supply Co.
2-3 C1titord Meeks.
. do.
Dr 185 2
Kg 207
+ 2
. do.
F D
66 4
6 Estimated discharge, 6 gpm on 122-59.
J-4
. do.
.l
. do.
Dr 210 3
Kg 210 F
D C6 4
14 Estunated discharge,10 gpm on 1-22-59.
I Supplies 2 homes ai.d store.
2-5 Lamar Service
.. do...
Dr 210 4
Kg 205 F
D 67 11 16 Casar.g: 4-in. to 200 ft.; 3-in. screen from 200 to 210 ft. Estsmated discharge, 20 gpm on
- Station, 11-10-58. S*.pplies 3 homes and service stataca.
J-6 C. E. Da v is, J r.
Dr 185 4
Kg T
DS 4
10 (7)
Q-7 Terry Walls.
Austin Stoucen-Dr 200 2)
Kg 176
+ 22 1-
-59 F
D,8 67 11 12 Estimated discharge, 20 gym. Supplies 3 homes sad stock.
a tre, 1
l I
i I
I l
t t
t 8
1 Q-B l Trs a y W.ath Dr 20d 21 ; K;!
.t N
l (?)
(
i I
Q-3 liunts r V.iuar. i, J r.
A utuiSts.A ca-Dr 200 2 *. l Kg 157 F
u C7 4
12 Mcasur=4 discharge 18. 5 gym on 1-29-59.
mire.
Well reported to have been flower.g for more than 50 yt ars.
-J. au G. (f. Y.=wy rc n.
Alex St.=t, amare Dr 2GO 2
Kg I4
, 12 2
Yl F
1rr Cas mg: 2-in. to 200 ft. ; touer 20 ft perfor-s We!! 4 Sun ply
(?)
ated. Entinut:4 d:scharge, 30 gpm on Co.
2-18-59. Supplaem water to take which a,
l tesed g-craotiacally for arragattua of crops ard pastures.
J-II M. S. We fer.
Dr 250 2
Ko 158 F
D.S c1 4
14 Messered daicharge, s.7 cpm on 2-18-5'J.
(?)
Sapplies 3 homes and st.ack.
Q -il E. L Clark.
Alex 5ta,ad.nustre Dr 290 2, I
- Ki; 159 15 2-
-59 F
D CT 4
10 Casang: 2-aa. to 60 ft.; 11-in. from sartace to Weil & Supply 290 ft. ; lower 20 fL perforat=4. Messered Co.
d.scharce, k 6 gpm on 2-18-59. Supplaes home and sesmmmg pool.
4 l
J - 13
. du.
. du.
Dr 2G5 2,11 Km 1M
. 12
. A.
P D
67 4
18 Cas ung: 2-an. to 60 ft. ; 11-an. f rom dort.tce to p
(?)
265 ft. ; lower 20 ft. perforatedt Mmured i
distharge, 3. 6 gpm on 2-19-59. So# tes honte and store.
I'D Q.14
.M S. f.larfee.
James A. Stou-Dr 225 2
Ke 101
. 5
. do.
Fi denmire.
Casing: 2-as to 225 ft.; 1oevr 20 ft. perfur-ti?
sted. Estimated discharge,10 gym on 2-18-59.
Sen es come and swimming neut.
s Q-15
. do.
Dr 115 2
Ke 157 F
D 67 4
10 Casing: 2-sn. to 215 ft. ;1omer 15 ft. peifor-i aled. Estarauted discharge, 2 s pne on t
2-18-59.
Q -16 C. C. Fonnytile.
Jant4 A. Stou-Dr 365 4
Kg 343 Cy D.S 11 108 ocaciare.
t?)
?-
Q.11 L. E. f t.yer e.
Alan Stoo&amare Dr 60 3
Qt 179 to 2-
-59 M
D W cIl & Supply Co.
~
12-18
. do.
Dr 250 3,2 Ke 185 0
. do.
Cf b,S 4
8 Cas tag: 3-and 2-in. to 200 ft. ; norte txtow.
4-19 l'aul f_ hutti.
Du 44 36 Qat 34t 20
. do.
Cf D,S Reported sL.daC water IcVel,13 ft. Letow (7) surface an August 1940.
Q-20 C. C. Youncerniae,
De 220 2
Ke 103. 2 do.
.F D
07 11 6
Casing: 2-in. to 220 ft.; lower 20 ft. perfor-ated. Measured discharge 0.1 gpm ca 2-18-59.
4-21
. du.
Dr 220 2
Ko F
D C8 11 8
Casing-2-ha. to 220 ft. : Lower 20 fL perfor-ated. Measured anscharge,14. I gpm out 2-18-59. Sapptses 2 honies.
Q -22 ht. S. Wrfee.
Dr 225 11 Ae 162
, 3 2-
-59 F
S 68 4
34 Measured discharge 2.7 gym o. 2-18-59.
Q -23
. do.
Dr 225 2, j Ke F
8 67 11 14 Do.
Q -2 4
. do.
Alex Stoudenstre Dr 250 2
Ks 168
. 4 2-
-19 F
D,3 45 4
18 Castag-2-m. La 250 ft.; lower 20 ft. perfor-Well t, Sapply sted. Measurto discharge, 9.6 gpm on Co.
2-18-59. Supplies fash an,nd and stock.
r e
Table 1. --Records of wolle and sprsnge in Autauga County. Alt.--Continued g
g, Water level Field determinatione r
I_
Y i_
s
=
3
,l$
I 3
j I
E I
I I g$
Y it h" pe ^'s D.: i g
a O
i 8
ir
~~
innte-B~g tal Rema.
t m
9
.e -
3 z.
g
=
a-x a
a a
a a
l 4 25 Alesander Od Modern Drdling Dr 1.256 10 Ke N
N Test hate for ont. See sample, driller's, and i
TestNo. 1.
Co.
Kg electric logo.
Ken
'J.28 W. B. Dominick.
Du 42 30 Qt 280 39 2-
-59 J
D.5 4
10 4 27 Jerico Baptist Alex Stoudenm.ro Dr 250 3
Ke 157
+ 3 11- -58 F
D 68 Measured discharge.12.0 span on 2-49-59.
Cherek.
Well & Supply Co.
R-1 D. L. Yarbrough..
.. do..
Dr 150 3}
Kg 405 75 9-
-58 Cy D.S 11 132 R. I D. M. Smith..
Du 52 24 Ke Cy D.8 39 184 Casing: 24-la. brick to 52 ft. Well has been in (7) use atace about 1830.
Cy D
11 48 R-3 W. E. Henderson.
Dr 125 3
Ke
(?)
R-4 H. M. Doeter.
Dr 135 3
Kg N
N R-5 Prattedte Wemorial Alex staudenmare Dr 154 6
Kg 360 55 9-
-58 T
1rr Caetng: 8-in. to 142 ft.; 4-in. screen from 142 Cardene.
Well & Sepply to 154 ft. See sample and drdler's logs.
Co.
R. 8 Oreea Estate..
'o.
Dr 162 4
Kg Cy D,8 11 32 Casing: 4.im. to lfJ ft..; none below.
R-T Lee Eo ste.
.. do....
Dr 137 3
Kg Cy D
11 18 Suppines 2 homes.
(7)
R. 8 C. R. Hull.
Du 72 24 Ke 264 64.1 10- 9-59 N
N Cy D
11 22 R-9 J. J. Doone.
ties 8toudenstre Dr 150 3
Ke V/ ell & Suppty
(?)
Co.
R.10 Frank Y. Rope..
. do.
Dr 225 4
Ks S37 98.5 11-13-59 T
D 4
24 Casing: 4-an. to 220 ft.; 3-in. screen from 220 to 225 ft.
R.11 Pra"vdle Ice and Acme Drilling Dr 218 8.6 Kg T
Ind 4
20 Casing: 8-in. to 170 ft.; 6-in, from 157 to 177 Coal Co.
Co.
ft.; 6-ta. screen from 177 to 218 ft. Report-ed yield.197 gym in 1947. Reported to flow when not in use. See sample and draler's Inge.
Reported yleid. 200 ' pm ca 9-2-59. Supplies R.12 Gurney Manu.
.. do.
Dr 230 8
Kg T
Ind g
facturing Co.
cotton mdl.
R-13
.. do..
Austin 8touden.
Dr 175 2
Kg 188
+ 3 9-
-59 F
D 87.5 mire.
I a
6 e
.w A 3.s
H-14
&laicutm Graham Dr 123 2
Kg 228 0
9-
-59 F
N 87 4
20 Measured discharge, 2.0 gym on 9-2-59; 5.0 EetJie
(?)
gym on 10-29-04, it - 45 Prattvdie Elemen-Dr 99 2
Ke 230
+ 5
. du.
F P
67 4
40 Casing: 2-sn. to 70 ft. ; none below. Measured tary Sctod.
static water level,13 ft. above surface on 10-29-04. hieasured d acharge,12 spm on 10-29-04; estimated diseLarge, 5 gpm on 9-2-59. See draler's log.
R - 16 G. E Nw w t an.
James A. Stou-sJr 189 8
Kg T
trr 21 22 Casing: 8-in. to 169 ft. ; 4-in. screen trosa 169 denmare.
to 189 ft. Supplies swimmmg pool and 2,1swn6.
14-17 Wint 'r C.ardens Alea Stoudinmtre Dr 200 4
Kg Cy P
Suppines tourtat court and restaurant.
M ot el.
Well & Supply Co.
u-18 wunum E. M st-
. da.
Dr 186
- 5. 3 Kg 408 148.8 9 18-58 N
O Observation well,1959. Casang: 5-and 3-in.
thews tu.
to 183 ft.: 3-in. screen from 183 to 186 ft.
R 19
. do.
1.ayne-Cent ral De 225 8
ng 400 139.2 9-22-58 T
D,S Reported yield, 30 gpm in SegAember 1958.
Co.
Supplies home and stock.
Casing: 3-an. to 197 ft. ; 3-in. screen from 197 Ia -20
. do.
Ales Stoudenmire Dr 200 3
K8 Cy D
Well & Supply to 200 ft.
Co.
j
.9-21 Jennae Quinn Aesth stou-Dr 104 3
Kg Cy-D 18 120
- Gresham, denm e re.
14-22 Me,)ueen-Smith James A. Stou-Dr 186 5
Kg Cy D,8 68 11 104 Supplies 3 homes and dairy.
Farme.
deum tre.
R -23
. do.
Dr 200 5
Kg Cy N
It -2 4
. do.
Dr 185 4
Kg Cy D.S 18 128 Suppt ses several ;enant h':.mes and stock.
It-25 Jennie autna Owce Merphey.
Dr 180 3
Kg Cy D,5 18 114 Supp16es several hr,mes.
Gresham.
( ?)
4.
Dr 141.0 3)
Ke 312 91.5 9-25-58 N
O It-26 Stavtard Ost Co.
B-27 Sunset Trailer Park Acn e Drdling Dr 185 5,3 Kg 289 77.7 10- 9-59 T
P 11 112 Casing-5-in. to 105 ft.; 3 1n. from 105 to 145 Co.
(7)
- L ; 3-an. screen from 145 to 185 ft. Ses drdler's log.
R -2 8 Prattville lutch Ales Stoudenmire De 100 3
Ke 190
/
tto 60.5 11 22 Estimated discharge, 25 gym on 10 28-58.
! reere.
Well & Supply (7)
Co.
R-29 Pratten11e Swim.
Austm Stouden-Dr 300 3
Kg 189
+
- 8. 4 10-27-58 P
P 87 11 24 Measured static water level,11.9 ft. above mang 1%=1.
m ars.
surface ca 8-13-40. Measured discharge,
- 4. 4 gym on 8-13-40; estimated discharge, 4 gpm on 10-2'I-58.
R 30 do.
.. do.
Dr 100 2
Ke 187 F
P 88 Measured statte water icvel,17.7 ft. above surtace on 10-25-40. M wred discharge 4.9 gym on 10-25-40; estimated discharge, 2 gym on 9-21-53.
a J.
p r.
l Tabla a.--Rseerds of wells and springs in Autauga Cody. Ah.-Conttnued l
6 Water levet Field determinations x
2 I
1-
-t
~
s 2
I
=
at E
is t
g og 3" j o
73.
as 4
g y
i.*3 tt
=
7m%
og g
gE
]._ k-I-)
Rema h o
Owner Driller 15 S L
c kO 8~
A3
- t 4" 5 -
a=
i s
A B-e 8"
OU 5
i c
a 5
a-
=-._ _-_ ___
Mrtsured statte water level. 8.5 ft. abore sur-R.31 Prattuttle Swima Austin Stouden.
Dr 100 4
Ke 187 F
P 66 mirg Puol.
mire.
face on 8-13-40. Measured dscharte. 5.0 l
gym on 8-at-43; estimated discha ge. 2 gpm j
on 9-21-59.
R-32 Stoudenmis Es-De 100 1
Ke 179
+ 2 11
-58 F
D 87 4
80 Estimated discharge. 2 spen on 11-12-58.
tats.
R.33 Pugrim Rest Dr 100 2{
Ke
'fS
+2
.. do..
F D
67 11 12 Measured daccharge. 2.0 gym on 9-21-59.
Drytat Church.
Supplies several homes.
R-34 fienry Yarbrough.
Dr 200 2
Kg 178
+ 2
. do.-
F D
67 4
14 Measured ducharge.1.8 gym on 9-21-59.
Supp11es several homes and tourists.
Dr 100 1
K 180
+ 3
. do..
F D
66 4
18 Estimated dischsrge. 5 gym on 11-12 58.
R.35 Jerry Thomas..
Suppines several homes.
R-36 1
W. Spetgner.
L E. Sarber..
Dr' 86 2
Ks 180
+
- 4. 3 9-2-59 F
D 67 4
18 Measured discharge. 2.0 gpm on 9-2-59; 3.0 gym on 10-29-04.
R-37
- 11. H Thomas.
. do.
Dr 100 2
Ks 180
+ 6 8-
-59 F
D 66 Measured static water level. 30 ft. above sur-face on 10-29-04. Measured discha.te. 2.0 spm on 9-2-59; 10.0 gym on 10-29-04 R-38 Csty of Prettvills.
1.myne-Centr:1 Dr 360 18,8 Kg 178 7
6-
-54 T
P Known as city well 2. Casang: a6-m. to 306 ft.;
Co.
8.tn. from 266 to 310 ft.; 8-in. screen from 310 to 355 ft., gravel-walled. Reported draw-down.180 ft. efter 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> pumpmg 402 gym in June 1954. See dr 11er's tog.
3-39
. do.
Austin 3touden-Dr 350 6
Kg 180 T
N Well abandoned Decause of insufficient supply.
m are.
l Known as enty well 1.
'R.43
. do.
Layne-Centrst Dr 436 16,8 Kg 183
- IS T-
-44 T
P 2
36 Caamg: 18-in..to 315 ft. ;
Co.
Kek 8-in. from 262 to 320 ft.; 8-in. screen from 320 to 34C. 355 to 375, and 413 to 433 ft.
Drawdown 62 ft. after 9 hours1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br /> pumping 412 gpm s
in July 1944. See drater's tog.
R.41 E. C. Knight..
Alen Stoudenmare Dr 100
- 4. 2 Ke 250 60 9-
-58 Cy D
60 11 142 Casing: 4-tm. to 80 ft.; 2-in. from 80 to 95 ft.;
Well & Supply 2.tn. scruem from 95 to 104 ft. Suppttes home Co.
sad service statnon.
i R.42 W. W. pope.
Dr 90 3
Ks Cy D
11 128 Supp11es homs and service statnon.
Cy P
18 114 Casing: 4-in. to 130 ft.
R-43 Culf $? ate 011 Co Acms Drditng Dr 175 4
Ks Co.
(7) a
=--
It-14 1.ongview Trader A1 e hdeamtre Dr 170 4
Ke 272 TO 9-
-58 T
P 18 144 Casing: 4-an, to 110 ft. ; mone below. Reported Cou rt.
Wua 6 Supp!y Co.
yteld, 35 rpm in 1953. Suppites 20 to 30 home traders.
ft-45 Jolm ! Moc e.
. do.
Dr 100 4
Ke
.J D,3 18 142 11 - 4 6 Mr Jueen. Smith Dr 200 4
Kg
' Cy N
Farm..
(?)
H -47 Dr 30 5
Ke 369 78.0 9-17-58 J
D.S 68 11 33 H -48 Tr.immel! Od Co.
Aten Stoudenmare Dr 130 2
Ke 17 5
- 13. 8 4-24-56 Cf D
11 140 Supplies home and service station.
Welt in Supply Co.
It-49 Itro Devd service
. do.
Dr 80 4
Ke J
D 18 135
- Sutiosi, f1 50 W. iter Whcel Austm Stouden-Dr 220 4
Kg 171
+ 1 9-
-58 Cf P
68.5 18 97 Measured static water level, 2.0 ft. above sur-flestaurant.
mare.
face on 8-17-40. Estamated discharge. less than 1 gpm on 9-24-58.
H
',1 Me Jucen-Smith Dr 200 2!
Kg 158
+ 6
. do.
F S
65 11 100 Esumated discharge, a0 gym on 9-17 58.
Farms.
t R-52 PralmL-Eipera-Alex Stoudenmare Dr 172 4[
Ke 276 Cy D.,S 4
10 Casing: 4-m. to 155 ft. ; 2-an, screen from 155 ment Statum.
Welt 8 S. apply
(?)
Co.
to 172 ft. Supplaes 2 homes and stock.
It-53 Jaca whittake r.
W.itson Dr:11mg Dr 412 8
Ke T
1rr 68 11 30 Casing
- B-2=. to 412 ft.1 casing slotted and Co Kg gravel-walled from 120 to 412 ft. Reported yield, 300 rpm in 1958. Irrigates erops and sxtstures. See electrac log.
It-$4
. do.
James A. Stem.
Dr 200 4
Kg Cy D,8 18 38 Casmg: 4-sn. to a80 ft. ; 3-an. screen from a60 denm are.
to 200 ft.
It
- .S W. II. Itermelat4.
A!es Pux.destmire Dr 200 3,2 Kg F
D 68 11 10 Caming: 3-and 2-in, to 200 ft. ; tower 20 ft.
Well & Suivly Co.
perforated, fleported dachsrge. 8 gpen an No ember 1958. Supptsee 10 homes.
1144
- 1. E. Dupunt Corp.
Dr 200 3
Kg
'100
.2 10-30-58 N
N
(?)
ft.??
C. D. Iteyonirts,
Austm stouden-Dr 180 4
Ke 206 25.9 11-13-59 J
D,5 4
12 mire.
It-55 Craves 1t211.
Alez Stoudenmare Dr 100 4
Ke 198 31.2
. do.
J D,S 4
22 Supplies 4 homes and stock.
Well di Supply Co.
R -59
- 11. fl. Thoms.
Aust m Stouden-Dr 376 2
Kg 155 F
D,9 68 11 23 Estimated discharge, 5 gpm on 10-30-58. Well mare.
formerly flowed about 35 gpm.
ft-60 W..f. Liparomb.
James a. drou-Dr 400 8
Kg 280 100 10-
-58 T
D.S 11 22 Casmg: 6-in. to 400 !L fleported yield. 40 gpm denmire.
~
sn 1958. Supplies home and chiceen farm.
R-$1 F.1 Lipscomb.
.. do.
Dr 200 4
Kg 165 5
. do.
J D,S 11 20 Well is reported to now in winter and sprinal.
'3 - 1 Tai Planunon Dr 70 4
Ke 153 23.4 10-30-58 J
D.S 5
16
- ^
q e
I Tatdo 1. --!tecords of welle and springs an Au*wga Co.enty, Ala. --Contmued
.e j
W: ster teret l Field determinations
=
i=
=
I n
E 5
a:
~,t w
t n
=
a 1
f a
o 0
ae
=
=
I Owner Drdler oO 3
4s
=*
MU b$
I E
4 3 8^h.-
Remarks g
oE E
L.
2:
3" 3 in ogs 6
e-ou U
=
g 12 QO.
o a
=~
g_
5
.=
=g ajg 8g 2
- a e.
5 A
o
- s 5-p p
=
S. 2 741 Plantation.
Dr 300 3
Kg 153
. O.1 10-30-56
- N N
Welt nowed untti 1955.
83
. du.
W. J. Boseman, Dr 300 4
Kg J
S 68 11 24 Well at site nowed ontd 1955.
Jr.
S. 4 Wall Howard Smith.
James A. Sto -
Dr 400 2
Kg 150 Cf D.8 4
12 Well reported to now when act beang pamped.
denm are.
55
.. do.
... do.
Dr 400 3
Kg 150
+ 8.7 3-2-59 F
S 37 1
12 Measured dacharge,1.2 gpen on 3-2-59.
S. 6 Tdi Plantation..
Dr 3G0 2i Kg 150
- 3. 0 10 30-58 N
N We11 newed untd 1955.
8-T
. tr,
W. J. Bozeman.
Dr 300 3
Kg 130
+ 6
. do.
F s
68 11 16 Kattmated discharge,15 gpm on 10-30-58.
J r.
T1 Wadsworth rian-James A. Stou-Dr 400 4
Kg 474 to 2-
-59 Cy D,5 Casang: 4-in. to 400 ft.;10wer 20 f*. perforated.
tation.
deam tre.
See driller's log.
A. R. Jones.
Alex Stoudenstre Dr 420 2
Kg 142
+
- 7. 0 4 14-59 F
S 68 4
12 Ca' sing: 2-in. to 400 ft.; none below. Measured l
T. 2 Well & Supply discharge,1.2 gym on 4 14-E3.
Co.
T. 3 Emory Jones.
Dr 450 4
Kg Cf D.8 Deposted to flow in winter.
T-4
.. do.
Dr 450 4
Kg 150
+ 4 2-
-59 F
S 69 4
18 Casing: 4-in. to 450 ft. Measured discharge, 10.0 rpm on 2-26-59.
T-5 Charles Aleaander.
Dr 300 3
Kg 146
+ 2
. do.
F D.3 68 4
8 Measured discharge, O.8 gym on 2-26-59.
T-6
. do,
Alem stoudamire Dr 450 3
Kg F
S Well & supply Co.
F D,8 69 4
16 Messured discharge 24.0 gym en 2 26-59.
T-7 Will Howard Smith.
. do...
Dr 400 3
Kg 151 Suppines 2 homes and stock.
T. 8 Wadsworth Plan-
. do.
Dr 400 3
Kg 154
+ 4 2-
-59 F
5 Casing: 3-in. to 400 ft.;1ower 20 ft. perforated.
tation.
Measured discharge, 6.3 gym on 2 24 59.
T. 9 Wdi Howard Smath.
de....
Dr 400 3,3/4 Kg 153
+ 2
.. do..
F S
87 4
14 Measured discharge, 2.7 gym on 2-26-59.
T-10
. do.
. do..
Dr 350 2
Kg Cf D,5 (7) 7 11 Grares Hall..
.. do....
Dr 400 3,2 Kg 157
+ 2 2-
-59 F
S 68 4
14 Casing: 3-and 2-in. to 400 ft. Measured dis.
- charge,1.0 rpm on 2-26-59.
T.12 Posten itanch.
. do..
Dr 400 2
Kg 153
.2 2-24-59 Cf D
4 13 1
i e
t n
[
^
T-13 Tdi Howard Smsth Alex Stoudenmire Dr 400 3
Kg 149
+
9 2-
-59 F
D,S 67 4
10 Measured discharge, less than 1 gpnt on well & Supply 2-26-59.
Cc.
T - 14 Wuteworth Plas-Dr 400 2
Kg 152 10
. do.
Cf S
4 10 Well nowed untd 1957.
1st uen.
U-1 J. M Gdt!*'<e.
Dr 42J 2
Kg 146 3
3
-59 F
D, S 68.3 11 16 Casing: 2-an, to 420 f t.
Measured dascharge, 12.6 gpm on 3-26-59.
U-2 4.
Dr 420 1
Ke 143
, 3 4-
-59 F
S 67 11 20 Casing:
I-m. to 100 ft.; none below. Esta-Kg mated dasettarge, less than 1 gym on 4-14-59.
U-3 L. D. Wr erbt.
Dr 400 4.21 Kg 147 2
. do.
F D,S 68 11 12 Casing: 4-and 2)-m. to 400 ft. Measured discharge
- 1. I gpm on 4-14-59. Supplies home and chicken farm.
U-4 J. M. G.siden,
th utley IV6 Dr 527 2
Kg 142 F
S 70 ta 18 Measured discharge, 2.5 gym on 4-t4-59.
V-I tl.inu litvi r Itanch.
Dr 2
Ke 139
+ 3 4-
-59 F
S 67.5 Il 40 Estam.sted du5 charge 3 gpm on 4-23-59.
(M V-2 Jotus D. Armstrong.
Dr 400 4
Ke J
D (21 240 Suppttes home and saamming pool.
- v. 3
. do.
Dr 400 4
Ke 126 F
S 65 592 278 Measured discharge from }-an. pape, 3,2 gpm on 4-23-59; melt rapped and etuspped wah float valve to prevent water waste.
V-4
. du Dr 400 4
Ke 126 e 4 F
S 69 443 202 Measured discharge from l-an. pipe, 2.9 gpm on 4-23-59; well capped and equipped with noat valve to prevent water w.aste.
- Mtg.
City of Mmagomery.
Layne-Cent rat Dr 200-6 Ke 146 15.3 2-19-52 N
27 8
Electric log shown on plate 3. See sample and T'v 109 Co.
281 drdier's logs of test wett drdled to depth of 1.2 49 ft.
450-6 Kg 146 14.0 2-26-52 N
05 2
2 521
- Mig
- Li.
. du.
Dr 538 153.9 N
N Abandoned and filled. See drdter's and sample TW-1 a 2 logs.
O I
s e
m i
t Table 2. --Chesnical nalyses of water from selected wetia in Aattura Coanty Ala.
(!!esut:s in parta per million except as indicated)
Well 140.. Numbere correspond with those L plate 1 and table 8 Water-beartng on Ka, Eataw formation; Kg. Gordo formation; Kek. Cokst formation; Qt, High terrace depostta.
=
aarda....
.g R
8 e
-e c
-e a
s c=co3 o
m z.
2
~
m s
u 3
a g
j vs E
s E
j 5
0*=r o
E 4
bi 3
41 o
o g
E3 3
i i
UE EC.
uo b
k 5
2 b
b N
1 it g
b I
A-5 floly Chost Mission School.
12-1-59 Kg 0.04
- 2. 7 13 0
- 5. 6
- 0. 8 0.1
- 0. 2 0
0 34.5
- 6. 3 (7)
D-8 D. M. Pa rker..
. do.
Kg
.03
- 1. 2 16 0
.4
- 1. 5
.1
.0 6
0 32.4 6.4 66 F. 4 L. D. Durmeister.
. do,
Kg
.02
- 1. 5 18 0
- 1. 2
- 1. 0
.1
.2 11 0
.33.9
- 6. 6 66 11-21 Pine Level tingh School.
. do.
Kg 12 3.8 4
0 1.2 3.2 0
13 7
4 41.5
- 5. 4 N-2 stastus McLendon.
. do.
Ke
.17 3.6 60 0
3.6
- 1. 0
.2
.1
!a 0
107 7.1 70 N. 3
. do.
10-29-40 Ke 32 3.0
- 2. 0
.4 21 68 O-2 C. E. Treadwell.
12-1-59 Ke
- 3. 4
- 2. 3 34 0
7.2
- 2. 0
.6
.1 27 0
79.0 6.7 P-1 J. D. Neighbors.
. do.
Ze
.04
- 1. 3 21 0
.4
- 1. 2
.2
.0 12 0
39.8
- 6. 6 66 P-17 Crystal Lake Drsom Co.
10-29-40 kg 11
- 1. 0 1.C
.1 8
68 Q-26' W. D. Dominkk..
12-1-59 Qt
.05
- 4. 7 3
0
.4
- 4. 0
.1 15b
-to 8'
54.8
- 5. 4
<f
' 1t-43 City of Prattvale.
. do.
Kg
.01
- 5. 6 56 0
- 4. 0
- 1. 5
.1
[.1 36 0
97.5 7.2 Kek j (
S-1 Tal1 Plantation.
.. do.
Ke 03
- 4. 0 11 0
.0
- 5. 0
.1 15 16 6
64.4 6.1 Mig.
City of l'u - wry.
2 20-52 key
.24 40!
11
- 1. 0 27
- 2. 8
- 1. 0 8
0 679
- 8. 6 TW-100 Do.
. do.
2 23 52 Kg /
.16 24 0
3
- 2. 0 0
.3 2
0 46.7
- 7. 0 68 2
I 4
g g
k O
O l.
6
Stig.
Cay or Montennery.
3-12-52 Ke /
0.08 25 0
12
- 8. 8
- 0. 2 0.2 30 9
99.7 6.3 67 3
T W-!!2 N-
&5-3-14-52 Kd./
.32 64 0
6 3.0
.2
.4 42 0
C17 7.3 68 N-
. do.
3-21-52 Kg /
.08 84 0
.2
- 3. 0 0
.2 29 0
143 8.1 C9 5
If Intervat sampled 2CJ4dl Icet (Eutas tormation). 2f hterval sampled 450-521 feet (Cordo formatants. 3/ hterval sampled 97-140 reet (Eutaw formatacu;_
4f nuerni umeted 2n-31o reet tr. ordo tornauont S/ dierv.
ampica 3:so-458 rect (cordo tormation).
2 c
i 1
50 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala.
Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
~
Well E-4 Owner: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Driller: Layne-Central Co.
Gordo formation:
Granules and pebbles; pale yellowish-orange very coarse-grained, subrounded to rounded ferru-ginous sand; and varico!ored sandy clay......
20 20 Clay, varicolored, sandy, slightly micaceous, and yellowish-orange subrounded to rounded cherty ferruginous pebble s..................,.
45 65 Clay, moderate-reddish-brown, sandy, slightly micaceous, and yellowish-orange subrounded to rounded cherty pebbles................
23 88 Coker formation (?):
Sand, very pale-orange to white, coarse-grained, angular to subangular, slightly micaccous, and some varicolored sandy micaceous clay......
22 110 Clay, gray and varicolored, sandy, micaceous,
(
lignitic, and very pale-orange coarse-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular sand....
24 134 Sand, very pale-orange to white, medium-to coarse grained, angular to subangular, clayey, and dark-gray sandy ligrutic clay...........
21 155 I
Clay, gray, fissile, slightly sandy, ligrutic, mica-
)
ccous, and pale-yellowish-orange coarse-to very coarse-grained, with granules, subangular to rounded ferruginous sand...
22 177
51-Table,3. :.-Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth -
S (feet)
(feet)
Well E -Continued Coker formation (? )--Continued Clay, gray, fissile, slightly sandy, micaceous, lignitic, very fossiliferous, and numerous fossil fra gme nts......................
45 222 Clay, gray, slightly sandy, micaceous, lignitic, fossiliferous, and white calcareous sandstone..
21 243 Clay, gray, sandy,- micaceous, lignitic, slightly fos silife ro us.........................
23 266 Clay, gray, sandy, micaceous, lignitic, fossili-
~~
ferous; light-greenish-gray coarse-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular slightly glauconitic sand; and light-gray calcareous slightly micaceous sandstone..............
23 289 Clay, gray, sandy, micaceous, lignitic, fossili-ferous, and yellowish gray coarse-to very coarse-grained sand, with some subangular to subrounded granulea and pebbles...........
22 311 Sand, very pale-orange to white, very coarse-grained, with some angular to subangular granules, and gray sandy micaceous lignitic fo s s ilife r o u s c lay.....................
44 355 Sand, pale yellowish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subanguhr, clayey, mica-ceous, slightly lignitic and ferruginous.......
22 377 Sar.d, very pale -orange, cos.rse-to very coarse-grained, with some angular to subangular slightly micaceous granules, varicolored sandy micaceous clay; and gray sar dy micaceous li g ni ti c clay.........................
21 338
52 Tabl6 3'. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well E-4--Continued Pre-Cretaceous rocks:
Sand, pale yellowish-orange, coarse-to very coarse-grained, with some angular to sub-rounded granules and pebbles; varicolored sandy micaceous clay; gray sandy micaceous lignitic clay; and dark-greenish-gray chloritic
'biotitic schist..
20 418 Well O-14 Owner: Bama River Ranch Driller: Watson Drilling Co.
No r e c o r d............................
230 230 Eutaw formation:
Sar.d, light-greenish-gray, fine-to medium-grained, angular to subangular, well-sorted, glauconitic, slightly micaceous, with some light-gray micaceous, glaucomtic clay.......
42 272 Sand, light-greenish-gray to yellowish-gray, fine-to medium-grained, angular to subangular, well-sorted, glaucon1 tic, slightly micaceous, and light-gray to yellowish-gray glauconitic m i c a c e o u s sa ndy c lay...................
21 293 Sand, yellowish-gray to light-greenish-gray, medium-grained, well-sorted, very glauconitic, micaceous, and abundant light-gray to brownish-gray glauconitic micaceous sar.dy clay.......
21 314 1
l l
i
y-l 53 Table 3. --Sample logo of wells in Autauga Gounty, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well O-14--Continued Eutaw formation--Continued Sand, light-greenish-gray to yellowish-gray, medium-to coarce-grained, angular to sub-angular, well-sorted, glauconitic, slightly micaceous, with small amount of gray to brownish-gray glauconitic micaccous sandy clay..............................
42 356 Sand, light-greenish-gray to yellowish-gray, medium-grained, angular to subangular, well-sorted, slightly glauconitic and raicaceous, with some light-brownich-gray glauconitic micaceous s a n dy c lay..........................
21 377
~ ~
Clay, gray to light-brownish-gray, sanf, slightly f
glauconitic and micaceous, and yellowish-gray medium grained, angular to cubangular sl!ghtly g la u co ni t i c sa nd...
42 419 Sand, light yellowish gray, fine-to medium-grained, angular to subangular, well-corted, glauconitic, micaceou.:; light-gray to brownish-gray glaucenitic micaceous sandy clay; and small amount of pale-red purple to moderate-reddich-brown raicaceous cilty clay.........
21 440 l
f
i l
l 54 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well P-25 (Samples described by C. W. Drennen)
Owner: Autaugaville State Nursery Driller: Layne-Central Co.
No re c o r d............................
21 21 Terrace deposits:
Sand, light-red, medium-grained, with some coarse I
ferruginous pebbles....................
23 44 i
Granules and pebbles, subrounded............
23 67 Eutaw formation:
1 Clay, yello." sandy, with some quartz pebbles...
21 88 i
Clay, gray, fissile, sandy, glauconitic........
22 110 Sand, yellow, medium-grained, glauconitic.....
21 131 Clay, gray, fissile, with light-brown inedium-grained glauconitic sand.................
22 153 Sand, greenish yellovr, medium-grained, with fragments of gray waxy glauconitic clay......
23 176 Sand, greenish-gray, medium-to coarse-grained, very glauconitic, and fragments of brownish-gray fis sile clay......................
23 199
~
Sand, yellowish-green, medium-grained, very i
t glauconitic, and fragments of brownish gray fi s s ile c lay..........................
22 221 Sand, yellowish-green, coarse-grained, very glauconitic, and fragments of brownish-gray fi s s ile c lay..........................
23 244
55 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well P-25--Continued Eutaw formation--Continued Sand, green, medium-grained, very glauconitic, with fragments of gray fissile clay..........
22 266 Sand, yellowish-gi een, medium-to coarse -
grained, very glauconitic, with fragments of gray wa rj c lay........,...............
92 289 Clay, gray, fissile, with yellow meditu._-grained ve ry glauconitic sand...................
23 312 Sand, grayish yellow, medium-to very coarae-graine d, ve ry glaucenitic................
22 334 Sand, yello.7, medium-to cer rse-grained, very gla u c o niti c..........................
23 357 Gordo forrnation:
Sand, reddish yellow, mediurn-to verj coarse-grainad, glauconiti.:, and varisolored, red, purple, gray, and yellow c'ay.............
23 380 Cisy., varicolcred, and reddish yello.y medium-to coarse -graine d sand..................
23 403 Sand, bro rn, coarse-to very cearse-grained, with abundant chert and quart; pebbles, and some fragments of secd -indurated glauconitic sand and va ricolorad cla.y................
23 426 L
Clay, varicolored, sandy, and brown medium-to very coarse-grained sand with some granAes..
21 44'T 1
l l
56 Table 3. --Sample logs of walls in Autauga County, Ala. -- Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well P-25--Continued Gordo formation--Continued i
Sand, brown, medium-to very coarse-grained, with some granules; a few fragments of vari-colored clay; and some glauconite..........
23 470 Clay, gray, fissile with carbonaceous imprints; varicolwed clay; and reddish-yellow medium-grained glauconitic sand.................
23 493 Sand, yellow, coarse-to very coarse-grained, viith some granules, and varicolored clay.....
22 515 Sand, yellow, very coarse-grained, with gicanules, a nd va ricolored clay...................
46 561 No r e c o r d............................
9 570 Well P-26 Owner: Autaugaville State Nursery Driller: Layne-Central Co.
Terrace deposits (?):
Sand, yellowish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, clayey, fe r r u gino us.........................
22 22 Cloy, moderate-reddisn-orange, sandy, slightly mi ca c e o u s..........................
22 44 Sand, yellowish-orange, medium-to very coarse-grained, with some angular to subrounded ferru-ginous granules and pebbles..............
22 66
i
)
57 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well P-26--Continued Eutaw formation:
Sand, yellowish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, clayey.
glauconitic, ferruginous, slightly micaceous...
22 88 Clay, dark-greenish-gray, sandy, micaceous, slightly glauconitic....................
22 110 Clay, greenish-gray to yellowish-orange, sandy, t
glauconitic, and grayish yellow medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular glauco-nitic ferruginous sand..................
22 132 Clay, greenish-gray, sandy, slightly glauconitic and micaceous, and pale yellowish-orange medium-to coarse-graincd, angular to sub-angular slightly glaucenitic ferruginous sand...
22 154 Clay, yellowish-orange to brown, sandy, glauco-nitic, slightly micaceoun, ferruginous, and yellowish-orange medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular slightly glauconitic fe r r ugino us sand......................
22 176 l
t Sand, grayish-orange, medium-to coarse-Frained, angular to subangular, very glauconitic, ferru-ginous, and yellowish-gray sandy micaceous glauconitic clay 22 198 Clay, gray, sandy, glauconitic, micaceous, and light-greenish-gray coarse-grained, angular
^
to subangular glaucon1 tic sand.............
23 221 i
i 6
58 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well P-26--Continued Eutaw formation--Continued Sand, greenish-gray, coarse-grained, angular to subangular, glauconitic, and yellowish-gray to gray sandy glauconitic calcareous slightly m' ca c e ou s c lay.......................
23 244 Sand, yellowish-gray, medium-to coarse-grained, angular o subangvJar, glauconi'ic, and olive-gray fissile sandy micaceous calcarcous clay...
23 267 Sand, yellowish-gray, coarse-to very coarse-grained, angu'ar to subangular, sligh'.17 glauco-nitic, and olive-gray sandy r-J.caceous clay....
23 290 Sand, grayish yellow, coarne-grained, angular to subangular, glauconi:i, eligntly ferruginous, and gray sandy sligir.ly glauconi;ic clay.......
22 312 Sand, yellowish-orange, ccarce-crained, angular to subangular, slight'y glauceni'ic, ferruginous.
22 334 Sand, yelloveish-orange, nedium-to coarse-graineo, angular to subangular, slightly glauco-nitic, ferruginous, and yellowish-g ay sandy mica ce ous clay.......................
23 357 Sand, very pale yellowish-orange, medium-to
~
coarse-grained, angular to subangular, slightly l
glauconitic; some manganese-coated (?) sand, grayish-yellow sandy clay................
23 380 Sand, pale yellowish-orange, mediura-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, slightly ferru-l ginous, and grayish-yellow sandy clay.......
23 403
59 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autaugh County, Ala. - Continued i
Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well P-26--Continued Gordo formation:
Clay, dark-yellowish-orange to moderate-reddish-brown, sandy, slightly micaceous..........
23 426 Clay, pale-red purple and moderate-reddish-brown, sandy.............................
22 448 Clay, moderate-reddish-brown, sandy, slightly mic a c e o u s..........................
22 470 Clay, varicolored, sandy, and moderate - eddish-orange coarse-grained, angular to subangular clayey ferruginous sand.................
22 492 Pebbles and granules, pale yellowish-orange, sub-angular to rounded, quartzitic; o&le yellowish-orange very coarse-grained, subangular slightly ferruginous sand; yellowish-gray sandy clay...
23 515 Sand, pale yellowish-orange, coarse-to very coarse-grained, with some su'oangular slightly ferruginous granules, and yellowl;h-orange s a ndy c lay..........................
23 538 Sand, pale-yellowish-orange, coarse-to very coarse-grained, with some angular to sub-angular ferruginor s granules and pebbles, and some varicolored sandy clay..............
46 584 Sand, very pale-orange, coarse-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular, slightly ferru-ginous.............................
23 607 Sand, dark yellowish-orange, very coarse-grained, with subangular very ferruginous granules and pebbles, and some varicolored sandy clay.....
22 629
60 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued j
Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well P-26--Continued Gordo formation--Continued t
Sand, pale-yellowish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, claycy, ferru-gi no u s..............................
25 654 Well Q-25 Owner: Alexander Oil Test No. 1 Driller: Modern Drilling Co.
Eutaw formation.
Sand, yellowich-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to aubangular, slightly glauconitic, ferru-ginous; red limor.itic clay, and light-gray slightly mica c e o us c lay.......................
24 24 Sand, yello.vich-orange to reddicit-brown, medium-to coarce-grained, angular to subangular, glau-conitic, very ferruginous.
0 33 Sand, yellovtish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, glauconitic, f e rr ugi nous.........................
30 63 Sand, yellomsh-orange, coarse-grained, angular
~
to subangular, glauconitic, ferruginous, and light-gray slightly micaceous clay..........
30 93 1.
Sand, pale yelloviish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, slightly glauco-nitic, ferruginous, and light-gray clay.......
31 124
I l
61 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in AutauFa County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well Q-25--Continued Eutaw formation--Continued Sand, yellowish-orange, medium-grained, angular to subangular, slightly glauconitic and micaceous, ferruginous, and light-gray to reddish-brown micaceous clay...........
30 154 Sand, yellowish-orange, coarse-grained, angular to subangular, slightly glabconitic, ferruginous, and light-gray fissile slightly micaceous clay...
30 184 Sand, very pale yellowish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, slightly glauconitic and ferruginous, and gray glauconitic micaceous limonitic sandy clay............
30 214 Sand, very pale-orange to white, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular slightly glauconitic, and light-gray sandy clay........
31 245 Sand, pale yellowish-orange, medium-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular, clayey, ferruginous, slightly glauconitic...........
30 275 Clay, pale-red purple,' moderate-reddish-brown and dark-red, sandy; white calcareous sandstone; yellowish-orange medium-to very coarse-grained ferruginous sand........
30 305 Sand, yellowish-orange, medium-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular, clayey, ferru-ginous, slightly micaceous...............
29 334 Gordo formation:
]
Sand, pale-yellowish-orange, medium-to very
62 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
We11 Q-25--Continued Gordo formation--Continued coaree-grained, angular to 'subangular, clayey, slightly ferruginous, with some yellowish-orange subangular to subrounded granules..........
31 365 Sand, very pale-yellowish-orange, coarse-to very coarse-grained, subangular, clayey, and some yellowish-orange subangular to subrounded quartz and chert granules................
30 395 Sand, pale yellowish-orange, coarse-to very coarse-grained, st.bangular, ferruginous; yellowish-orange subrounded ferrugincus granules and pebbles; some varicolored sandy clay..............................
61 456 Sand, very pale-orange, medium-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular; some very pale-orange subrounded granules; and some varicolored s a n dy c 1ay..........................
30 486 Sand, very pale yellowish-orange, medium-to very orange subrounded ferruginous granules......
30 516 coarse-grained, subangular, clayey, and yellowish-Sand, pale yellowish-orange, coarse-to very coarse-grained, subangular, clayey, ferruginous, and yellowish-orange subrounded to rounded ferruginous quartz and chert granules and pebbles............................
31 547 Clay, brown, pale-red purple, and moderate-reddish-brown, sandy; very pale-orange medium-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular clayey slightly ferruginous sand; some yellowish-orange subrounded ferruginous granules 27 574
63 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well Q-25--Continued Gordo formation--Continued Clay, varicolored, sandy; light-gray micaceous clay; pale-yellowish-orange medium-to very coarse-grained, cubangular slightly ferru-ginous sand; yellov>ish-orange subrounded quartz and cher+. granules and pebblee............
SO G34 Coker formatier.(?):
Clay, varicolored, candy; light-to dark-gray pyriti: micaceous slightly glauconitic clay.....
30 664 Clay, gray, cancy, micaceou. ligni ic, pyritic; brown to red micaccous clay; very pale-orange medium-to coarse-grained, angular to sub-angular ca.nd come for,2il fragments.........
30 694 Clay, gray, sandy, mics cecut ligni'ic, pyritic; very pale -orange med:.u n- :o very car.,e-grair.ed, angular te ;uts.n u'ar cand; :ome fossil fragment 30 724 Clay, light-to dark-grt.y. candy, micaccous, slightly glau:enitic and '.i.gric. and come fossil fragmen';
31 755 C.'.ay, gray, sa ndy. nicaceous, lign'.ic, pyri'.ic; varicolored sandy clay; light-gray medium-to j
very coarse-grained., angular to subangular j
sand; white calcareoua : lightly micaceous s a nd s to ne...........................
30 785 Clay, light-gray to brou n, sandy, micaceous; light-gray to."hite medium-to very coarse-grained, with some granules, subangular quartzitic sand; come pyrite and lignite.......
31 816 I
i
?
G4 i
i Table 3. --Sample logo of welle in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued t
Thickness Depth (feet)
' feet)
Well Q-25--Continued l
l Coker formation (? )--Continued Clay, gray to brown, sandy, micaceous, lignitic, T
pyritic, and white calcareous glauconitic mica-ce o u a c a nd s tone......................
31 84'!
Clay, gray to brown, candy, raicaceous, lignitic; wh'te coarse-to very coarce-grained, sub-angular cand; white to yellowich-orange sub-rounded quartz granules and pebbles.........
63 910 Clay, gray and brown, candy, micaceous; white calcareous glauconitic inicaceous aand: tone; very pale-orange coarse-to very coarce-grained, cubangular pyritic rand; yellowish-o' range cubrounded to rounded q.artz granuleo a nd p e bb le s.........................
59 939 Sandstone, dark-gray, pyritic; varicolored candy micaceouc clay; very p.1 e-crange medium-to i
1 very coarce-grained, rubangtd?r cand; pale-orange cubrounded quartz and chert granules and r
pebbies; co ae reworked for.il fraginents.....
30 999 Clay, gray, ficcile, micaceous; greenish-gray I"
calcareouc micaccou pyritic saridctone; come 7
pale-ora.nge cubangular to subrounded quarta gra nule s and pebble :...................
31 1,030
[
I Clay, gray and varicolored, sandy, raicaceous, pyritic, yellowish-orange subrounded quarta l
gra nule s a nd pebble s...................
30 1, O SO f
i i
s l
65 Table 3. --Sample logs of wc11s in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet) '
Wel1 Q, Continued Coker formation (? )--Continued Sand, yellowish-orange, very coarse-grained, subangular, ferruginous; yellowish-orange subangular to subrounded quartz and arkose granules and pebbles; gray fissile micaceous sandy clay; varicolored micaceous sandy clay..
61 1,121 Granules ar:d pebbles, pale yellowish-orange, angular to subrounded, quartzitic, and gray and brown sandy micaceous pyritic clay.........
31 1,152 Pebbles and granules, yellowish-orange, sub-angular to rounded, quartzitic, arkosic, and
~~
grayish-brown sandy micaceous pyritic clay...
30 1,182 Pebbles and granules, yellowish-orange, sub-angular to subrounded, quartzitic, arkosic; gray and varicolored sandj' micaceous pyritic clay; light-gray micaccous pyritic schist..,,.....
31 1,213 Pre-Cretaceous rocks (?):
Granules and pebbles, pale-yellowish-orange, sub-angular to rounded, quartzitic; gray fissile mica-ceous clay; varicolored sandy micaceous clay..
30 1,243 No r e c o r d............................
13 1,256 l
l L
66 r
Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well R-S Owner: Prattville Memorial Gardens Driller: Alex Stoudenmire Well and supply Co.
Terrace deposits:
Clay, moderate-reddish-brown, sandy, mica-ceous; dark-yellowish-orange medium-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular ferru-ginous sand, with some granules...........
20 20 Sand, yellowish-orange, coarse-to very coarse-grained with granules, subangular, ferruginous,
22 42 Sand, pale yellowish-orange, coarae-to very coarse-grained with granules, angular to sub-rounde d, fe rruginous...................
21 S3 Eutaw formation (? ):
Sand, pale yellowish-crange, coarse-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular, ferru-ginous, slightly micaceous...............
21 84 Sand, pale yellowish-orange, medium-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular, mica-c e o u s, fe r r u gi no u s....................
21 105 l
Sand, yellowish-orange to light-reddish-brown, medium-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular, micaceous, ferruginous, and some varicolored sandy micaceous clay..........
21 126 i
L Gordo formation (? ):
Saad, pale yellowish-orange, very coarse-grained, aubangular, slightly ferruginous.....
21 147
67 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga Cot.aty, Ala. --Continued Thickness depth (feet)
(feet)
Well R-5--Continued Gordo formation (?)--Continued Sand, very pale yellowish-orange, coarse-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular, slightly ferr uginous....................
7 154
'Well R-11 Owner: Prattville Ice and Coal Co.
Driller: Acme Drilling Co.
No r e c o r d............................
144 144 Sand, pale yellowish-orange, medium-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular, ferru-ginous, and varicolored sandy lignitic clay.....
21 165 Sand, pale yellowish-orange, coarse-to very coarse-grained. subangular, slightly ferru-ginous, and varicolorad sandy clay..........
21 186 Sand, pale yellowisil-orange, coarse-to very coarse-grained, subangular, slightly ferru-gi nc u e.............................
21 207 Sand, very pale-orange, coarse-to very coarse-grained, subangular, slightly ferr ugince 11 218 L
l l
l l
68 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth
.( feet)
-- ( fe e t).
Well Mtg. TW-109 (Samples described by H. L. Reade, Jr.).
Owner: City of Montgomery Driller: Layne-Central Co.
Mooreville chalk:
~
k Sand, dark yellowish-orange and light-greenish-gray, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, micaceous, glauconitic, fossil-iferous, a nd yellow clay.................
10 10 Eutaw formation:
Clay, greenish-gray, micaceous, and light-greenish-gray medium-grained, angular to subangula r glaucon! tic sand...............
12 22 Sand, light-greenish-gray, medium-grained, angula.r to subangular, pyritic, glauconitic, and greenish-gray micaceous fossiliferous clay..............................
10 32 Sand, light-greenish-gray, medium-grained, angular to subangular, pyritic, glauconitic, and white sandy lime stone..................
14 46 Sand, light-greenish-gray, medium grstned, angular to subangular, pyritic, gir..uconitic....
10 56 Sand, light-greenish-gray, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, pyritic, glauco-nitic, and greenish-gray micaceous clay......
24 80 Sand, light-greemsh-gray, medium-grained, angular to subangular, glauconitic, and greenish-gray micaceous clay. Contains fragments of sandy limestone.............
60 140
i 69 Table.3.,--Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, _ Ala. --Continued Thickne ss Depth
' (feet)
(fee t)
Well Mtg. TW-109--Continued Eutaw formation--Continued
~
Sand, light-greenish-gray, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, pyritic, glauconitic; greenish-gray micaceous clay; limonitic concretions...................
32
'172 Sand, light-greenish-gray, fine-to medium-grained, subangular to subrounded, glauconitic, and greenish-gray micaceous clay..........
13 185 Sand, light-greenish-gray, medium-grained, angular to subangular, glauconitic, and greerdsh-gray micaceous clay.............
10 195 Sand, light-greenish-gray, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, pyritic, glauco-nitic, and small amount of gray clay........
24 21S Sand, light-greenish-gray, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, glauconitic, and greenish-gray micaceous clay.............
14 233 Sand, light-greenish-gray, fine-to medium-grained, angular to subangular, glauconitic, and greenish-gray micaceous clay.............
34 2G7 Sand, light-greenish-gray, medium-graine d, angular to subangular, pyritic, glauconitic, fossiliferous. Contains fragments of limestone.
22 289 Sand, light-greenish-gray, fine-to medium-grained, angular to subangular, glauconitic, fossiliferous, and greenish-gray micaceous clay..............................
13 302 4
. ~,.
- - -1
70 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth _
(feet)
(feet)-
Well Mtg. TW-109--Continued Eutaw formation--Continued Sand, light-greenish-gray, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, glauconitic, fossiliferous, and greenich-gray micaceous 24 326 clay..............................
Gordo formation:
e Clay, dark-reddic.;h-brown and light-greenish-gray, micaceou2, and pinkish-gray raedium-grained, angular to subrounded pyritic glaucoaitic fossilif-erous cand........
10 033 Sand, pale-grayich-orange, rnedinn:,-grained, angular. clightly ;;1auconitic, and moderate-i reddish-browa, dark yellowish-orange, pale-green, and greenisit-gray clay.............
10 34 3 Sand, very pale-orange, coarce-to very coarre-grained, angular to cubangular, Mightly glauco-nitic, and moderate-reddirl -brown, pale-green.
[
and dark yellowish-crange clay............
10 356 Sand, very pale-orange, raedium-to coarse-grained angular to subangular, slightly glauco-nitic, and dark yellowish-crange, raoderate-reddish-brown, and pale-green clay.........
1S 372 Sand, very pnle-ye"owish-orange, fine-to medium-grained, angular, cubangular, and moderate-I reddish-brown, pah-green, and pale-red-purple 10 382 clay...........................
4 W
l' E
P P
,-v
71 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued l
Thickness Depth -
(feet)
(feet)
Well Mtg. TW-109--Continued Gordo formation--Continued Sand, yellowish-gray,. medium-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular, and moderate-reddish-brown, pale-green, and pale-red purple clay..............................
13 395 I
i Sand, very pale-yellowish-orange, medium-to i
coarse-grained, angular to'subangular.......
10 405 Sand, very pale-orange, medium-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular, pyritic, and small amount of varicolored clay...........
13 418 l
Sand, very pale yellowish-orange, medium-grained, angular to subangular, and moderate-reddish-brown, pale-green, and pale-red parple clay...
10 428 Sand, very pale-yellowish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, pyritic.
13 441 Sand, grayish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, and moderate-reddish-l brown, pale green, pale-red purple, and j
yellowish-brown clay...................
10 451
)
Sano, grayish-orange, medium-to very coarse-l grained, angular to subangular, and varicolored c lay..............................
47 498 Sand, pale-yellowish-orange, medium-to very f
l coarse-grained, angular to subangular.......
23 521 I
Sand, pale-yellowish-orange, medium-to very coarse-grained, angular to subangular; yellow to reddish-yellow quartzitic cherty gravel; and i
moderate-reddish-brown, pale-green, and pale-r e d p ur p le c lay.....................
15 536 i
f
,. + -
,-,,,...e,.,.
4
f l
72 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness D_epth (feet)
(feet)
Well Mtg. TW-109--Continued
.s.
Gordo formation--Continued Sand, very pale-orange, fin ~e-to medium-grained, angular to subangular, and greenish-gray, moderate-reddish-brown, and pale-red purple 10 546 clay..............................
Sand, very pale-yellowish-orange, medium-to coarce-grained, angular to subangular, glauco-nitic, and pale-green, grayish-red purple, and moderate-reddish-brown micaceous clay......
37 583 Sand, very pale-yellowich-ors.nge to white, fine-to medntm-grained, angular to subangular, glauconitic, and pale-green, moderate-reddish-brown, and moderate yellowish-brown mica-24 607 c e o u s c lay..........................
l Coker formation:
Sand, yellowish-gray, fine-to coarse-grained, angular to rubangular, glauconitic, and pale-green, grayish-red purple, and moderate-reddish-brown micaceous clay.............
66 673 Clay, greenish-gray and pale-green to varicolored,
,, j micaceous, and yellowish-gray fine-to medium-L 37 710 graine d, a ngular sa nd..................
Sand, white, medium-grained, angular to sub-13 723 a n g u la r............................
Sand, white, medium-grained, angular to sub-angular, pyritic, and pale-green and pale-10 733 purple to varicolored micaceous clay........
73 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet) -
(feet)
Well Mtg. TW-109--Continued Coker formation--Continued Clay, greenish-gray, micaceous, lignitic, and light-greenish-gray fine-to medium-grained, angular to subangular pyritic lignitic sand.....
46 779 Sand, light-greenish-gray, fine-to medium-grained, angular, lignitic, pyritic, and greenish-gray micace ous lignitic clay........
14 793 Clay, greenish-gray and pale-green, micaceous, lignitic, and light-greenish-gray fine-to medium-grained, r.ngular pyritic lignitic fossiliferoua sand..............................
48 841 Sand, light-greenish-gray, fine-to medium-grained, angular to subangular, pyritic, fossiliferous; greenish-gray and pale-green micaceous clay; and white sandy limestone....
10 851 Sand, light-greenish-gray, fine-to medium-grained, angular to subangular, glauconitic, pyritic, lignitic, fossiliferous; light-greenish-gray micaceous clay; and white sandy limestone.
24 875 Sand, light-greenish-gray, medium-grained, angular, pyritic, glauronitic..............
13 888 Sand, light-greenish-<, ray, fine-to medium-grained, angular, glaucon1 tic, and pale-red-purple, greenish gray, pale-green, and moderate-yellowish-brov.4 mica ceous clay...........
10 898 l
~
l h
74 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continue'd Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet) '
Well Mtg. TW-109--Continued
- i..
Coker formation--Continued Sand, white, medium-to coaree-grained, angular to subangular, pyritic, glauconitic, and greenish-gra, moderate-reddish-brown., and pale-green micaccous fissile clay..........
13 911 Sand, white, medium-to very coarse-grained, angular to subrounded, and yell'ow and grayish-b r o w n c la y..........................
10
,921 Sand, light-gceenish-gray, fine-to medium-grained. angular to subangular, pyritic, foss111f-erous, and greenish-gray micaceous clay.
Contains pyritized wood fragmento..........
13 934 Sand, whih, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, pyritic, glaucenitic, and greenish-gray, moderate-reddich-brown, pale-green, and pale-red purple micaceous clay............
24 058 Clay, greenish-gray, micaceous, fissile, and white medium-to coarse-grained, angular to sub-angular pyritic glauconitic sand............
31 989 Shale, greenish-gray, micaceous, fissile, and white fine-to medium-grained, angular to sub-angular biotitic pyritic sand..............
13 1,002 j
Shale, greenish-gray and pale-green, micaceouc, fissile; varicolored clay; :and very pale-orange medium-to coarse-grained, angular to sub-angular pyntic glauconitic sand....
10 1,012 l
I 75 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well Mtg. TW-109--Continued Coker formation--Continued Sand, very pale yellowish-orange, coarse-grained, angular to subangular, and moderate-reddish-brown, pale-green, and greenish-gray micaceous fi s s ile c lay.,,.......................
14 1,026 Sand, very pale-orange, fine-to medium-grained, angular to subangular, pyritic, glauconitic, a nd va ric olor ed clay...................
10 1,036 Sand, yellowish-gray to very pale-orange, medium-grained, angular to subangular, pyritic, iimonitic, glauconitic, and greenish-gray, pale-red-purple, moderate-reddish-brown, and light-green mica-ceous fissile sandy clay.
24 1,OGO Sand, very pale-orange, medium-grained, angular to s uba ngula r.............
13 1,073 Clay, greenish-gray, pale-green, moderate-reddish-brown, and pale-red purple, candy, micaceous, fissile. and white medium-grained, angular qturtzitic pyritic glauconitic sand.....
10 1,083 Sand, very pale-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, and vari-c olor e d clay...........
SS 1,148 Sandstone, very pale yellowish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular, hard.
5 1,153 u
Sand, very pale yellowish-orange, medium-grained, angular to subanguiar, and greenish-gray, moderate-reddish-brown, and pale-red-purple micaceous fissile clay.
24 1,177 j
t 1
76
'lable 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well Mtg. TW-109--Continued Coker formation--Continued Sand, very pale yellowish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular h subangular, and greenish-gray, moderate-reddish-brown, and pale-red-purple micaceous clay 38 1,215 Pre-Cretaceous rocks:
Sand, very pale-orange, raedium-to very coarse-grained, angular; varicolored clay; and biotitic s chistose f ragme nts....................
4 1,219 Well Mtg. TW-112 (Sarr.ples described by H. L. Reade, Jr. )
Owner: City of Montgomery Driller: Layne-Central Co.
Terrace 3eposits:
Clay, dark-yellowish-orange...............
10 10 Sand, pale yellowish-orange, coarce-to very coarse-grained, angular, micaceous, and fine to coarse quartzitic gravel...............
22 32 Sand, light-brown, very coarse-grained, angular to subangular, micaceous, and fine subrounded qua r tzitic g ra vel....................
10 42
.77 Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well Mtg. TW-112--Continued Eutaw formation:
Sand, grayish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, engular to aubangular, micaceous, a nd gr e e ni s h - gray clay..................
13 55 Sand, pale-yellowish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, ferruginous, micaceous, and greenish-gray micaceous clay..
14 69 Sand, light-greenish-gray medium-to coarse-grained, anguiar to subangular, micaceous, and greenish-gray micaceous clay.............
22' 91 Sand, light-greenish-gray, fine-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, glauconitic, micaceous, and greenish-gray micaceous clay..........
10 101 Sand, light-greenish-gray, coarse-to medium-grained, subangular to cubrounded, slightly frosted, shghtly glauconitic, micaceous......
13 114 Sand, light-greenish-gray, coarse-to medium-grained, angular to subrounded, slightly frosted, slightly glauconitic, micaceous, and greenish-gray mica c e ous clay...................
10 124 Sand, light-greenish-gray, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, slightly frosted, glauconitic, micaceous, and greenish-gray mica-c e o u s c l ay..........................
37 161 Sand, light gre.nish-gray, medium-grained, angular to subangular, glauconitic, micaceous, a nd gre e nis h-gray clay..................
23 184
78 Table 3. --Sample logo of well.' in Autauga County, Ala. --Contintled Thickne ss Depth (feet)
(fee)
Well Mtg. TW-117--Continued Eutaw formation--Continued Sand, light-greenish-gray, fine-to rcedium-grained, angular, rnicaceous, lignitic, and greenish-gray micaceous fissile clay........
10 194 Gordo formation:
Clay, greenish-gray, micaceous, varicolored clay, and light-greenish-gray rcedium-to fine-grained, angular to cubangular glauconitic micaceou; sand..............................
13 007 Clay, varicolored, and light-greenich-gray fine-grained, angular glauconitic cand...........
10
'!17 Sand, very pale yellowish-crange, tnediu1-to coarse-grained, angular to sebangular, fe rru-ginous, and varicolored clay.............
j8
%55 Sand, pale yellemch-orange, mediuni-to coarce-grained, angular to subangular, ferruginous; varicolored clay; and greenish-gray micaceous c lay.............
10 235 Sand, very pale yellowish-orange, rr.edi m-to coarce-grained, angular to cubangu'ar, ferru-ginous, and varicolored c'.ay 14
$79 Sand, pale yellowish-orange, medium-to coaren-i grained, angular to suaangular, ferruginous, slightly micaceous, c.nd greenish-gray, pale-green, pale-red-purple, and inoderate-red m i c a c e o u s c lay.......................
20 302
"9
~
j Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)_
Well Mtg. TW-112--Co.,tinuad.
Gordo formation--Continued Sand, very pale yellowish-orange, medium-gral. sed, angular to subangular, ferruginous, and vari-c olo r e d c lay.........................
10 312 Sana, pale-yellowish-orange, fine-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, ferruginous, and pale-red purple, pale-green, moderate-reddish-brown, and greenisn-gray micaceous clay.....
12 324 Sand, pale yellowish-orenge, fine-to medium-grained, angular to subangular, ferruginous, pyritic, micaceous, and very rale-green, pale-red purple, moderate-reddisL-brown, brownish-yellow, and greenish-gray micaceous clay.....
47 371 Sand, very pale-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, ferruginous, micaceous, and greenish-gray to varicolored glauconitic clay..
10 381 Sond, very pale-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular, ferruginous, micaceous, and moderate-reddish-brown, pale-red purple, pale-green, and greenish-gray micaceous clay.....
13 394 Sand, pale yellowish-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, ferruginous, and va ricolor ed clay......................
10 404 Sand, very pale-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, ferruginous.
14 418
l l
i l
i l
1 80 i
Table 3. --Sample logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Contin' ed u
Thicknes s Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well Mtg. TW-112--Continued Gordo formation--Cent!nued Sand, very pale yellowish-orange, fine-to medium-grained, angular to subangular, ferruginous, mica-ceous, and greenish-gray to varicolored micaceous chy.
10 428 Sand, white, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, ferruginous, slightly micaceous, a nd varicolored clay...................
14 442 Sand, w?lte, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, and varicolored clay.........
10 452 Sand, very pale-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, ferrugincus, and pale-green, moderate-reddiah-brown, and pale-red-p ur ple sa ndy clay.....................
37 489 Coker formatior.-
Sand, ve.j pale-orange, medium-to coarse-grained, angular to subangular, ferruginous, i
pyritic, micaceous, glaucenitic, slightly lignitic, and greenish-gray micaceous ligr2.ic clay.....
10 499 i
Sand, very pale-orange to white, fine-to couse-grained, angular to subangular, micaceous, pyritic, slightly glauconitic, lignitic, and greenish-gray micaceous lignitic clay........
14 513 I
i Sand, light-greenish-gray, fine-grained, angular, micaceous, pyritic, lignitic, and greenish-gray, pale green, pale-red purple, and moderate-reddish-brown sandy micaceous clay........
25 538 i
31
~
Table 4. --Drillers' logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala.
Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well D-11 Owner: Southern Railroad Driller: Brady Drilling Co.
T o p s oil................................
8 8
Sand..................................
8 16 S oa p s to ne, r e d...........'................
84 100 Sand..................................
100 200 10 210 Soapstone..............................
Sand..................................
10 220 15 235 S o a p s t o ne..............................
Sand..................................
10 245 Soapstone..............................
75 320 Sand..................................
33 353 Well H-90 Owner: Ruth M. Fleenor Driller: H. W. Peerson Well Co.
C lay, c a n dy.............................
15 15 Sa nd a nd grave l 4
19 Clay, yellow, sandy.........
21 40 C lay, c oa r s e ly s a n dy......................
21 61 Sand. coarse; clay blocks...................
20 81 Sa nd, coa r s e, pa c ke d......................
10 91 Sand, coa r s e, pa c ke d, a nd clay...............
10 101 Sand, coa rce; clay blocks...................
20 121 Sand, packed; clay blocks...................
10 131 Sa nd, fine, a nd clay.......................
10 141 C lay, r e d, s a n dy.......................,.
10 151 C lay, c oa r s e ly sa ndy......................
20 171 Sand, coa r s e, pa cke d......................
10 181 m
C l ay, b lo c ky............................
I 182 S a nd, c oa r s e, pa c ke d......................
9 191 Norecord..............................
74 235
- Note: Log of well drilled at site and abandoned.
l
l 82 Table 4. --Drillers' logs of wella in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
- (feet)
Well P-25 Auta' ga'ville State Nursery Owner:
+'
u Driller: Layne-Central Co.
Sand a nd grave l....................,.....
40 40
- Clay...................................
20 60 Sa nd a nd grave 1..........................
10 70 C l ay, ha r d.............................
12 82 C l ay, s a n dy..............................
10 92 Rock.................................
1 93 S a n d, d r a g gy............................
19 112 Sar d; c u t be tte r..........................
17 129 Clay with s treaks of sand....................
27 156 Sand...........
10 166 Clay.................................
21 187 Sa nd, pa c ke d...................
0 196 Clay.............................,....
2 198 S a n d, pa c k e d............................
9 207 S a n d, d r a g gy............................
4 "il S a n d, pa c ke d............................
20 til Clay..................................
7 238 C l a y, s a n dy.............................
30 268 Sa n d, pa c k e d......................
14 282 Clay..................................
3 285 S a n d, pa c k e d............................
5 290 Clay..................................
8 298 Sa n d, pa c k e d............................
22 320 Clay.................................
2 322 Sa n d, pa c ke d............................
45 3G7 C lay, r e d..............................
103 470 Clay with s treaks of sand.................
25 495 Sand, soft..............................
15 510 Sa n d, pa c k e d............................
40 550 Clay..................................
5 555 Sand..................................
4 559 C lay, sa ndy, s o f t.........................
11 570 i
s
i 83 Table 4. --Drillers' logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(fee 0 Well P-26 Owner-Autaugaville State Nursery Driller: Layrie-Central Co.
Sand,. re d, and clay.......................
12 12 Sand.........................
9 21 Clay..................................
14 35 Sand..................................
9 44 C lay, sa ndy............................
44 88 C lay, b l u e..............................
32 120 Sa n d, ru u d dy.............................
10 130 C lay.................
12 142 Sa n d, mu d dy............................
9 151 Clay......
9 160 Sa nd a nd s tr ea k s of c lay....................
42 202 Clay..................................
11 213 Sand..................................
14 227 Clay..................................
4 231 Sand..................................
2 233 Sand a nd streaks of clay....................
36 260 S ha l e, s a n dy............................
22 291 Sand and streaks of clay....................
46 337 S a nd, y e llow........................,....
7 344 Clay, ca ndy, yellow and blue.................
14 350 Sand, yellow, hard, and clay.................
22 380 Sa n d, y e ll ow............................
22 402 Clay..................................
83 45 C lay, ca ndy.............................
11 496 Sa nd, pa c ke d............................
18 514 Clay..................................
8 522 Sand, packed; clay bedo in upper 8 feet..........
1G 538 Sand, packed, a nd gravel....................
46 584 Sa nd, pa c ke d............................
35 599 C lay...........
2 601 52 nd, s treaks of clay......................
7 308 S a r.d, pa c k e d............................
10 618 Clay, r e d,. and sa nd.......................
36 654 l
l
I 4
i i
84 Table 4. --Drillers' logs. of wella in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well Q-25 Owner: Alexander Oil Test No.1 Driller: Modern Drilling Co.
C la y, r e d...........................
78 28 Sand, brown.
45 73 2
75 Clay...
S a nd, b r ow n............................
25 lt,0 Clay..................................
5 105 Sa nd, b r o wn...........
S4 169 Clay..................................
174 Sand, streaks clay...
' 30 304 Rock...................
1 506 Sa nd, str ea ks c hy........................
10 315 Clay, streaks packed rand...................
5 320 Clay, ha rd.........
70 390 Sand..............................
30 430 C lay............
4 424 S tnd and gravel S7 511 C l ay..........
4 515 S and a nd g ra ve !..........................
57 572 o
Si8 C., lay.....................
Sand..................................
I '.' 2 740 M a rl, b 1r e...................
31 771 Rock.................................
1 772 Clay, sandy....
13 790 Clay and bouldera.........................
170 9S0 Rock...............................
3 903 coate, c.;,.reaks sana,.
m-n 1,21o-j
.. s,
Gumbo..
31 1,246 Rock.................................
10 1,25G m
l.
i 1
l
t l
85 Table 4. --Drillers' logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness "Septh (feet)
(feet)
Well R-5 Owner: Prattville Memorial Gardens Driller: Alex Stoudenmire Well and Supply Co.
Soil, gravel, a nd clay......................
20 20 S a nd a nd gra v e 1..........................
43 63 Sand, y ellow, a nd clay.....................
21 84 Sand, yellow, and gray clay..................
21 105 Sand, yellow, and varicolored clay.............
21 126 Sand, y ellow, c oa r s e......................
12 138 Sand, yellow, ccar se, clean..................
16 154 Well R-11
~
Owner: Prattville Ice and Coal Co.
Driller: Acme Drilling Co.
Cinders...............................
4 4
Sa ni a nd grave l..........................
11 15 Sa n d, m u d dy............................
13 28 Clay, sa nd a nd g ravel....................
32 SO S a n d, m u d dy............................
21 81 Sa nd, dra ggy............................
17 OS Sand...........................
12 110 Clay (gumbo).....
20 130 S ha l e.................................
3 133
[
Sand................................
12 145 C lay..........
4 149 Sand..................................
2 151 Clay..................................
3 154 Sand..................................
14 168 Clay..................................
2 170 Sand, packed; clay a t bottom.................
48 218 u
1 m-e7-e
- w. 3 ee.
.,eae
86 Table 4. --Drillers' logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well R-15 Owner: Prattville Elementary School Driller:
I. E. Sarber 30 30 Sand...
Marl.................................
'i0 90' Sa nd, wa te r -b ea ritig.......................
9 99 Well R-27*
Owner: Sunset Trailer Park Driller: Acrne D illing Co.
Sa nd, re d, a nd grave l......................
20 20 Sand, yellowish-tan, glauconitic...............
35 85 Marl, blue 20 105 S a nd, y e llow, rn e d iura..............
23 130 Sa nd, fine
- o rn e dium......................
25 155
- Note: Log cf well drilled at : rite and abandoned.
Well R-JS Owner-City of Prattville Driller: Layne-Cec. tral Co.
S a nd a nd gravel..........................
24 24 Clay..................................
3 30 Sand, re d.......
14 44 Clay..................................
49 93 Sa.d..................................
18 111 Clay...................................
23 137 i
Sand, fine....,.
5 142 C lay......
7 149 11 130 Clay, c andy.
Sand..................................
21 181 Sand, hard......
7 188
. a.
A e
I l
l l
87 Table 4. --Drillers' logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well R-38--Continued Clay, sand, a nd gravel.....................
32 220 Chy..................................
31 251 Sand..................................
4 255 C lay. s a n dy.............................
54 309 Sa nd, s tr ea k s clay........................
13 322 Sand.,................................
19 241 Clay..................................
42 383 Sand.,................................
15 398 S ha l e.................................
45 443 Well R 40 Owner: City of Prattville Dri!1er: Layne-Central Co.
Sa nd a nd gravel......................
13 13 C la y, s a n dy.............................
14 27 Clay a nd sa nd s tone........................
54 81 Sand..................................
27 108 C lay a nd ha r d s a nd s to ne....................
18 126 S a n d, m u d dy............................
9 135 Sands tone a nd clay.....................
15 150 Sand..................................
23 173 S a n d s *.o ne............................
3 176 Sand..................................
36 212 S a nd, ha r d...........................
33 245 Sa n d, ve ry ha r d..........................
35 280 Clay, some sand.............
37 317 Sand..................................
21 338 S a ndy c lay..............................
18 356 Sa nd, s t r e a k s clay........................
30 383 S oa p s t o n e, h a r d..........................
35 421 S a n d, v e ry ha r d..........................
21 442 C lay; s om e fine sa nd.......................
44 48S
88 Table 4. --Drillers' logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued i
Tdickness Depth
't (feet)
(feet) s, Well T-1*
Owner: Wadsworth Plantation a
C lay, r e d..............................
19 19 G ra v e 1................................
22 41 Norecord..............................
42 83 S a nd s to ne...........................
2 85 S a n d, fi n e..............................
22 107 Norecord..............................
37 144 Sand, fine..........
10 154 No r e co r d.................
106 260 Rock...
1 261 No r e c o r d..............................
29 290 Sand..................................
6 296 i
Norecord..............................
139 435 Sa nd, y e llo w, c oa r s e......................
5 440 Clay, ocher, red, and yellow.................
34 474 Sand..................................
1 475
- Note: Log of well drilled at site in 1905; well abandoned in 1950.
Well Mtg. TW-109 Owner: City of Mcntgomery Driller: Layne-Central Co.
C lay, s a n dy.............................
7 7
C ha lk a nd s h e ll s..........................
3 10 Clay, blue, wit'.1 streaks of sand...............
5 15 C l ay, b l u e..............................
17 32 Sand..................................
3 35 Rock.................................
1 36 C lay, ha r d.............................
3 39 l
Sand..................................
6 45 l
Clay, sandy, with streaks of sand..............
20 65 Sand...
8 73 Rock.................................
1 74 Clay, sandy, with streaks of sand..............
11 85 1
89 P
Table 4. --Drillers' logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well Mtg. TW-109--Continued Rock.................................
1 86 C lay, s a n dy.............................
4 90 Sand, with streaks of clay...................
11 101 Sa nd, har d, pa c ke d........................
2 103 Rock.................................
1 104 Sa nd, ha r d, pa c ke d........................
4 103 Rock.................................
1 109 Clay, sandy, with streaks of sand..............
13 122 Rock.................................
1 123 Clay, with s treak s of sand...................
20 143 Rock.................................
2 145 Clay, with thin streaks of sand................
9 154 Sand.................,................
6 130 Clay..................................
10 170 S ind, with thin streaks of clay................
13 183 Clay..................................
17 200 Sa n d, ha r d, pa c k e d........................
11 211 Clay..................................
2 213 Sand, ha r d, pa c ke d........................
3 21S Clay, sandy, with streaks of sand..............
22 238 Sand, hard, packed......
11 249 Sand, hard, packed, with streaks of clay.........
6 255 S a n d, ha r d, pa c ke d........................
23 231 R o c k, s o f t..............................
2 283 i
C lay, s a n dy.............................
3 286 Rock.................................
2 283 Clay, sandy, with streaks of cand..............
24 312 C lay, ha r d.............................
65 377 Sand..........,.......................
9 386 Clay........
15 401 Sand..................................
4 405 C1ay................................
12 417 Sand...
10 427 Clay..................................
9 436 Sand..................................
443
k
.i i
90 Table 4. --Drillers' logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet) e Well Mtg. TW-109--Continued Clay..................................
7 450 Sa nd, har d, ' pa c ke d........................
10 460 Clay..................................
2 462 Sand..................................
2 464 Sa nd, ha r d, pa cke d........................
11 475 C lay, ha r d.............................
5 480 Sand, with streaks of clay..............
2 482 S and. ha r d, pa cke d........................
7 480 Clay..................................
2 491 S a nd, ha rd, pa c ke d........................
30 521 Clay..................................
43 564 Sand, hard, packed...........
5 569 Clay..................................
,19 588 Sand, with s treaks of clay...................
25 613 C l ay, ha r d.............................
20 633 Sand..................................
4 637 Clay, hard.............................
20 S57 Sand..................................
4 651 C lay, h a r d.............................
7 SG8 4
872 C lay, s a n dy.............................
C lay, ha r d.............................
21 693 S a nd, fi ne - g ra ine d, pa c ke d..................
7 700 C l ay, s a n dy.............................
12 712 S a nd, ha rd, pa c ke d........................
15 727 City, with s treaks of sa nd...................
68 79?
Rock.................................
2 797 Clay, with streako of sa nd...................
10 307 C My, blue..............................
15 822 dock.................................
1 823 Clay..................................
2 825 Rock.................................
2 827 i
Clay, with streaks of cand...................
12 839 Rock.................................
1 840 Clay..................................
29 869 Clay, sandy, with streaks of sand..............
26 895 Sand...
7 902 I
91 Table 4. --Drillers' logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
Well Mtg. TW-109--Continued Shale, hard, with streaks of sand and clay........
105 1,007 Sand, hard, pa cke d........................
10 1,017 C lay, s a ndy, ha r d........................
60 1,077 Sand..................................
4 1,081 Clay, sa ndy, ha r d........................
21 1,102 Sand..................................
28 1,'130 Clay, sandy, with streaks of sand..............
18 1,148 Rock.................................
I 1,149 C lay, s a n dy.............................
7 1,156 C lay, ha r d.............................
7 1,163 C lay, s a ndy.............................
5 1,168 Sand...................................
6 1,174 Sand, with streak s of clay...................
21 1,195 S a nd s to ne..............................
20 1,215 S ha l e.................................
2 1,217 Rock.................................
1:
'1, 219 Weli Mtg. TW-112 Owner: City of Montgomery Driller: Layne-Central Co.
Soil..................................
2 2
Clay..................................
11 13 S a n d, m u d dy............................
3 16 Sa nd a nd gr a vel..........................
13 29 C lay, sa ndy, s of t.........................
22 51 Clay, with s treaks of sa nd...................
17 68 C lay, s a ndy.............................
12 80 l
Sand..................................
8 88 Clay..................................
9 97 Sand..................................
7 104 C lay, s a ndy..............,,.............
3 107 Sa nd, ha r d - pa c ke d........................
27 134 Sand, hard packed, with streaks of clay..........
6 140
92 Table 4. --Drillers' logs of wells in Autauga County, Ala. --Continued Thickness Depth (feet)
(feet)
(I Well Mtg. TW-112--Continued Clay, hard, with streaks of sand...............
20 160 Sand, hard packed, with streaks of clay..........
20 180 Clay..................................
G 186 S a nd, ha r d, pa c ked........................
7 193 Clay..................................
2 195 Sand..................................
1 190 C lay, va ri c o lo r e d, ha r d....................
19 215 C lay, s a ndy.............................
7 222 Sand, white, ha rd, packe d...................
7 229 C lay.............
4 233 Sa n d, hn r d, pa c k e d........................
5 238 C lay, sa n dy.............................
3 241 Sand, hard, packed, with thin streaks of clay......
7 248 C lay, s a n dy.............................
8 256 Sand, hard, packed, with thin streaks of clay......
15 271 Clay..................................
4 275 Sa nd, ha rd, pa c ke d........................
5 280 Clay, sandy.....
4 284 Sand, hard, packed, with streaks of clay.........
18 302 Sa nd, ha rd, pa c k e d........................
8 310 Clay..................................
4 314 Clay, with streaks of sand...................
11 325 C lay, ha r d.............................
6 331 C lay, s a n dy.............................
6 337 Clay, varicolored, hard....................
31 368 I
Sa nd, ha r d, pa c k e d........................
7 375 Clay..................................
3 378 Sand, with s treaks of clay...................
4 382 Clay..................................
8 300 Sa nd, with streaks of clay...................
8 398 Sa nd, ha r d. pa c ke d........................
21 4??
i 8
427 Clay....
l Sand..................................
5 432 Sa nd, ha r d, pa c k e d........................
26 458 l
Clay, hard. with s treaks of sand...............
37 495 Clay, hard, with streaks of lignite.............
43 538
e DOCUV EN~~
PAGE PU _ _EJ f
ANO.goason
[
NO. OF PAGES-REASON:
O PAGE ILLEGIBLE:
C HARD COPY RLED AT:
l O BETER COP ( REQUESTED ON
'%PAGE 00 LARGE TO FILM.
g) g-D C
,uD A1; mR OTHER LMED ON APERTURE CARD NO
0 0
DOCUMENT /
PAGE PU_ LED AkO. reaan NO. OF PAGES -
REASON-O PAGE ILLEGlBLE:
O HARD COPY FILED AT.
3 D BETTER COh' REOJESTED ON _
PAS /100 LARGE TO FILM..o 4-c- -,; -
OTHER _
t 4[
FILMED ON APERTURE CARD NO. h
l DOCUV ENT /
PA w
piled Ai.O.monoroon f
NO. OF PAGES
/
REASON-O PAGE ILLEGlB'E:
C HARD COW RLED AT.
/
J D BETTER COW REQUESTED ON _
MGE TOO LARGE TO RLM.
M COW RLED AT: POR OTHER MD ON APERTURE CARD NO. 8 4
l m
s-
DOCUM EN~:
PAGE P1
/
=
)
AkO.scaswi, NO. OF PAGES _
REASON O PAGE ILLEGlB1 O HARD COPY RLED AT.PDR CF OTHER _
l_
3_
D BETTER COPY REQUESTED ON ME TOO LARGE TO RLM.
COP ( RLED AT.
PDR OTHER d
ILMED ON APERTURE CARD NO l
1
a-r l
4 4:
s
- 19. -(ER: Section 4-3; p. 4-38; Resources Committed)-
Please provide a general decomissioning plan to be ef.fected at the a
end.of plant life, f
RESPONSE
As committed in Section 12 of the ANFFP Licens'e Application; " Specification S-I-11: Decontamination and Decommissioning"; at the end of plant life, w
the facilities and grounds will be decontaminated 'in-accordance with a i
general decommissioning plan so that these facilities and grounds can be released for unrestricted use. This plan will address financial arrangements for defraying the expenses of decommissioning; a letter from J. J. Taylor, Vice President and General Manager, Westinghouse Water Reactor Divisions,~
which-addresses this subject is provided in Attachment 19.1.
(Although the' introduction to this letter discusses the soecific Columbia, SC and Cheswick, PA licensed sites, the text of the letter applies its comitments to "... all of the
~
sites for which Westinghouse holds a Part 70 license".) This nlan will be kept part of the Demonstration Section of the license, and will be included as par' of the total Demonstration package to be submitted prior to the end of 1980; a summary of the plan follows:
1 Summary The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Division of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards requires that an application for a license be accompanied f
by a plan and cost estimate for decommissioning, and financial arran; sents to assure adequate funds to cover the costs at the time of decommissioning.
Westinghouse has accumulated actual experience in this area, including the preparation and submittal of a decommissioning plan for the Columbia, South Carolina fuel fabrication plant, and, implementation of decomissioning at the Cheswick fuel laboratories.
The Alabama Nuclear Fuel Fabrication Plant (ANFfP) plan makes maximum use of this experience in formulating a conceptual program in sufficient detail to indicate the scope of activities and estimate the costs involved.
s
~
t The ANFFP D'ecommissioning Plan, including'resulting cost estimates, is
- I preparedLwithin the following guidelines:
)
i 1.
Applicable experience obtained in planning the Columbia plant decommission-ing, and in planning' and carrying out the Cheswick Site fuel laboratory decontmaination and decommissioning activities, are' utilized to the extent practicable in preparing the ANFFP plan and cost estimate.
l 2.
Costs 'are expressed in 1980 dollars.
3.
Packaging, transportation and disposal charges are calculated using information ' rom an existing low level r:aste disposal facility as the repository for. contaminated material and equipment.
4.
Current radiological limits and decontamination technology are utilized.
5.
All process and ancillary equipment in controlled areas are' to be cleaned to-the' extent practicable, and are to be p*,ckaged, transported to, and dispositioned at a licensed disposal facility.
6.
All buildings are-to be cleaned to. levels established for unrestricted use.
7.
All contaminated underground piping is to be removed, cleared to the extent practicable, packaged, transported to, and dispositioned at a licensed disposal facility. The ground surrounding such piping is also to be surveyed and removed for disposal if contaminated beyond established '
a limits.
8.
Approximately 4-inches of top soil ar to be removed from the 30 developed 3
acres (16,133 yd ).
This material is to be used in site grading (e.g.,
placed over existing undisturbed top soil). Final landscaping is to result in extensive grass-covered areas, and new trees and sh% areas, q
to stabilize the soil. Thus, the top soil is to be available for re-distribution following decommissioning.
Within the above guidelines, Westinghouse has inventoried the equipment and material which has presently been designated for use in the proposed facility, and has estimated the portion likely to remain contaminated, or incapable of being satisfactorily decontaminated. This portion would be prepared and. transported for disposition at a licensed disposal facility.
)
Similarly the costs required for cleaning those portions of the facility requiring such decontamination (such as walls, floors, etc.)
wers estimatei
,___._.e.,____
,-ne,
,r--a--i--
+-
-e-
- r-
-,,,4-w r
.^e v.
- e. v e+w.
y-e w
- e. ep
.-ne--w.
ek---
s'==="S 49 The estimate provides an allowance for professional health physics staf#ing to perform a comprehensive initial survey, and then prepare a specific overall plan for approval by the appropriate licensing agency prior to the initiatic' of decommissioning activities.
It also provides for the required health physics surveillance during the entire operation, including the final clearance surveys of the " clean" facility, and an acceptance
- i. :pection by the appropriate licensing agency, as a condition of terminating the license.
Based on the above guidelines, and the independent contractor's estimate for decommissioning the similar Columbia facility, the total task costs for the ANFFP facility are estimated to be appr oximately $5,000,000.
Further, it is estimated that it will take approximately one to two years to complete the decommissionirg task.
+
m-
=
=
20.
(ER:
S:ction 6-1.2; p.6-8; Groundwater)
Paragraph two states that "other nearby offsite water sources were substituted for the abandoned, shallow on-site well." Please list and provide a map indicating the locatiori of these additional groundwater sources.
Please provide pertinent hydrologic information and corresponding water quality data.
I
RESPONSE
For the winter survey, a well (W-l' in figure 2-7) at a house directly north of the site (across County Route 4) was sampled.
During the spring survey, a water sample was taken from a water tap at the Prattville police station (which gets its water supply from the Prattville water system consisting of j
nine wells 300-600 ft, deep - see Para. 2.2.3 of the Environmental Report),
The map with Attachment 20.1 shows locations of these wells.
For the summer season, a ssmple from the canyon creek was substituted for the shallow on-site well. The source of water from the canyon creek is believed to be from groundwater seepage.
Details of hydrologic information and sampling results are given in Table 7 of reference 1, which is included with this submittal.
u,y,e
{
ATTACHIEllT 20.1 fic aber of >J oat'cl
- "a051"'"' '"'
s m N. aucknu CH Alpt M AN
"?s?n?e$n olIlo Ofy c/0, aim (l, A!alama
~he"'ANr"'.",E'00*
o P. O. son 609 TELtrwo=< ::6167 s3 i
fruth & Alalama LOCAT. ION OF WELL$
Well # 2
. Prate Pqrk Intersec tion' of Doster Street and Washington Street Well # 3 Davis Street Intersection of Davis Street and Smith Avenu' Well # 4 Underpass Intersection of East Main and Ra!hoad Well # 5 West Fourth Street West Fourth Street, 1000 feet vest of Autauga Creek Well # 6 Patrick Street West end of Patrick Street Well # 7 Newton Park Well # 8 By-Pass Intersection of 82 By-Pass and Highway 14 Well # 9 Forth Chestnut Street I: orth Chestnut Street one mile south of Highway 31 North hell # 10 Eunt's Alley Along branch between Third Street and Fourth Street J
~
m
's l
^
g~
I l
I
~
4%
3 s
-l m
o w;
/
e L.
j-.
.;y.
f
, -i -
,l w'
13.
i s, :s. -
q.,._K(
T8
\\i
_i l i-s x
- f. v 2
y y
j l.
i f-
,s
.m :-
h
?
i.
%l l
s s.
).
a j/ '
.k.
(
-=.r 5.
w
. %%\\
-ene.t
-tat.t
/
N j
).
l m
(
@C
.\\j i
~
} } f,'.
' 1~
,\\
2
\\
i %,,
J
'1 g:.,
~
~~
J
- e
.s*
(
.j s,-
,i.
.x t
.. i spg..
K l,
g-k.
l--,
%"[
].
- 1 e
t -
n
" * *. e
.O.
1
'E."
~ ~ ~ ' " '
\\
..{
' k,f I
f 3
le j
N,' ~~
y/
s
.. ~
~
- c. Li.
4,,
gw b'
E%
,/p 3
~
I\\_
.;.2 r
8
/
'dy g
'..,...-,N m.
,p
~
g
,-[
y m-lc.-
~~
4
,y i.
==
t
.\\
/
g i
as WE gagg gg y
s.
_~
'. \\,
l l
~
> 's N.s A_
, p-
./
.N
~~3 et
'e
~
m i
/
i y
u-.
My
,A s
,/
p..v.
\\
I 1
A g
@N )J. '\\
u,,.,
7""'
s.
Nl e
/
,,,,n,,
4 w
y'l(390 c rv ou Thea.d
)
- ~
f M,
l a
.3
)
i m m
21.
(ER:
Section 6-1.,4.1; p. 6-13; Terrestrial Ecoloav Survey)
Please provide a more detailed description of the methods used to sample small mammals; i.e., how many live-trapping grids were located in each habitat? How many traps per grid? How many nights were the traps set?
Provide similar information for the snap-trapping lines.
RESPONSE
In the fall surveys (1978) 50 live traps were used in each fence row and successional oak forest; and, 50 snap traps were used in each cotton field, pasture and mature oak forest. Trappings in pasture, successional oak forest and mature oak forest consisted of 600 trap-nights (i.e., 50 traps in each habitat for 4 nights).
In the winter and spring season surveys,166 and 180 trap-nights were conducted in the fence row and.right-of-way habitats.
Snap and live traps were set during the spring survey; live traps only were set in the wiater survey; no traps were set during the summer survey.
For the winter season, 85 Sherman live traps (5 x 7 x 17 cm and 8 x 9 x 23 cm) and one Tomahawk trap (28 x 32 x 80 cm) were distributed through the reajor and minor habitats (cottonfield excepted), on four nights, and were checked daily.
(Thus, mannal trapping during the winter season consisted of 344 trap nights, all with live traps.)
The same live traps noted above for the winter season sere used during the spring season survey (in pastures,1;. land successional and riature oak forests).
In addition to live traps, large Victor snap traps were set in cottonfields, fencerows, and upland successional and mcture forests. A minimum of 150 trap-r.ights were accomplished in each majcr habitat during this Spring survey.
- 22.
(ER: Section 6-2.2.2; p. 6-28; Well Water, Samoling and Analvsis)
On the same map, please show the location of all wells used in
.j preoperational monitoring and tnose intended' to be used for operational radiological and nonradiological monitoring. On what basis were these wells selected for radiological and nonradiological cnalysis.
.i
RESPONSE
Figure 6-3, (Attachment 22.1) - which shows groundwater monitoring stations used during preoperational surveys, with the exception of the one sample taken at the police station in Prattville - has been altered to show proposed groundwater monitoring stations during ANFFP operations. The response for item 20 shows locations of Prattville water system wells.
The proposed operational groundwater monitoring stations will be all on-site, and are identified as follows:
WWJ is the same as the well designated W-2 in the preoperational monitoring program.
WW2 is a well to be drilled cbout 300 meters west of the property line belonging to the nearest easterly off-site resident.
WW3 is a well to be drilled near the present ac.:ess road (center of the site),
about 200 meters southwest of the proposed plant fenced area.
Rationale for choosing these monitoring locations was as follows:
Well WW3,. located to the southwest of the proposed plant, was selected on the basis that much of the groundwater in this area is located just above the clay bearing surfaces in the Eutaw and Gordo formations, which dip south and southwe.? ward toward the Alabama River (see rections 2.4 and 2.5 of the Environmental Report). Thus any liouid seepages infiltrating to the groundwater would most likely migrate t) wards proposed well WW3.
Well VW2 was selected on the basis of monitoring liquid seeoages in the unlikely event that they might percolate through the groundwater towards the well of the nearer t off-site resident in the downslope direction.
-a
+ -...
y
_,g,,9,,.,
2-Well WW1 (directly east of the proposed fuel, manufacturing.buildin$) is to be.
monitored for the. unlikely event of percolation of liq'uid ' seepage toward tha nearest-resident in the easterly direction, u
Routine monitoring groundwater samples in the northerly direction is not deemed.necessary, since the general underground flow is towards the south ~
i or southwesterly direction as noted above.'
4 4
(
I e
(
(
.w.__
e
- n y
9 4
W e-y e p yw 1 =
1.e w e
+-w -e
- e,ww1 sa " vegve t -w.w tw-w u wugr e-gr vppetew '&*
- ggap++,,,in gene w ede mW tw'owev+w-p.W g
isTTACHMENT 22.1 l
I i
Wl
.9 W-2+ W1
[
SW l SITE' EG' e WW3
$3 W2 k
FI 1 SW 2 50 4 SO 5 SW 4 Alab4a
- /
j
?
i a
[
B h
I N
SW 3 FMer 0
2000 Legend:
.3 j
W=Well water f:
i i
i Scale in Feet SW= Surface water S02 Sediment FI= Fish Location of Surface Water, Sediment. Fish, and Groundwater Monitoring Stations During Preoperationei Surveys I
l
f a
1 23.
(ER: Section 6-3; p. 6-33; F, elated Environmental Measurement)
Please provide the ambient concentration of critical air pollutants measured at the nearest covernment air quality monitoring station.
RESPONSE' Data-for ambient fluoride concentration levels in air were collected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at the County Health Center, 515 West Jefferson Davis Ave., Montgomery, Alabama, for the period 1967-1970 as follows:(I)
/
Fluoride Congentration:
in air (pg/m )
Number of Maximum Arithmetic Year Observations (21 Daily Value Average 1967 26 0.47 0.06
' 1968 26 0.17 0.03 1969-26 0.07 0.03 1970 25 0.11 0.03-Data for ambient total suspended particulate (TSP) levels in air were collected by the U.S. EPA at several locations in Mont90mery for the years 19771978, and 1975, as follows:
3 TSP Concentration in Air (ug/m )
Year Location Number of (3) Maximum Aritnmetic Geometric Observa tions Dr ily value Average.
A"erace 1977 2815 Forbes Drive 44 314 56 48~~~~
1765 N. Decatur St.
40 139 45
- 39 1978 2815 Forbes Drive 39 92 43 42 1765 N. Decatur St.
37 128 57 50 645 S. McDonough St.
41 108 54 51 1979 2815 Forbes Drive 4?
94 53 48 1765 N. Decatur St.
41 96 4R 44 645 S. McDonough St.
47 98 54 51 (1 ) No later data on fluorides is available, since fluorides are not a parameter which is roatinely conitored.
(2) Each observation was for a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period, and observatf or.s were spread over a 12 month period. (see reference 2)
(3) Each observationwas for e 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period, repeated every six days.
>-y-,--
.gr e
- s, p t 9 w
e, y+-*
p
<s--J
.--v-qu-+eyy-.m
-- gywe w
-i+y,"*gygy,ge y 37 w.
's
.ww
,sq,,-pgrg ey',,, p y ww 7
y e++,w--m,-ey-.gy-ay-aep<-V
+
=
Q
_ _g.
S i
. ( 4-Data.for existing ambient uranium concentration levels in air were-also -
collected by EPA, through its Environmental Radiation Ambient Monitoring System (ERAMS). Data for the closest monitoring station to the ANFFP site s
were takenc at the Eastern Environmental Radiation Facility (EERF), located on 1890 Federal Drive-in Montgomery..for the period July 1973 through
.l June 1978. These data are 'as previously reported in Table 2-30 of. the
'ANFFP Environmental'Re? ort.
.j
<1 l
t 19 5
i
24.
(ER: Section 7-2; Plant Site Alternatives)
This section discusses the criteria used to selec't the candidate site.
and briefly explains the desirable characteristics of the Prattville j
location but does not provide comparable data for the alternate locations.
Please provide information 'as specifically as possible for other alternate locations so that the staff can assess the applicant's
)
analysis and independently evaluate the alternatives.
RESPONSE
hhe ANFFP Environmental Report ("ER") provides detailed information demonstrating the ecological desircoility of the Prattville, Alabama site.
Environmental attributes include the site's favorable topology'(high, flat plateau region),
meteorology (good air dispersion characteristics and mild climate) and hydrology-(bounded by a perennially flowing stream and the Alabama River, not prone to flooding). A large number of other sites in the Southeast are generally comparable from.an environmental standpoint.
Since, as documented in the Environmental Report, the " major benefits (associated with ANFFP) that will be enjoyed by the neighboring comunities will totally recompense the minor economic atid environmental costs to the local area that will resalt from the construction and operation of ANFFP" (ER, p. S-8), Westinghouse r'oes not believe any detailed evaluation of alternative sites is appropriate.
In this regard it should be noted that a nuclear fuel fabrication plant differs from the situation presented by the proposed cons'ruction and operation of a nuclear power plant.
In the latter case, enviroamental and other considerations talght significantly limit the number of sites that can reasonably be considered as potential alternatives.
In contrast, a nuclear fuel i'abrication plant is similar to hundreds of other industrial facilities whose environmental impacts are so minimal that a virtually unlimited number of sites can be considered as potential alternatives.
l 1
a._.._,-
,.....,_..-..u_.
... -.. ~, _ -.,
,,,,,.,..~._4,-
25.
(ER: Sectilon8; Socioeconomic,)
(a) The number of employees that will. be needed'for construction and for-
" shakedown" -- over time -- is not clear. On pages S2, S-7, and 8-3, i
it is stated that an average of'about 150 workers wi11 be needed' during the 24-month construction period (1982-84) and that approx 1-
. I mately 115 of these will be _ hired locally. However,.on pages 8-3 and 8-7 it is stated that construction employment will peak at -
either 400 (p. 8-3) or 500 (p. 8-7).
On pages S-3 and_8-3 it is -
. i 3;
stated that about 120 workers will be needed following con'structibn i
during the nine-month equipment shakedown period. What is the
~
' maximum number 'of employees that are expected to be needed during these periods? How long will they work and when will they be I
needed? How many of.these will be hired locally? A bar chart indi-J e
l cating employment requirements through time would be helpful.
(b) Pp. S-7, 8-3, and 8-4.
It is estimated that secondary or " induced"
{
employment in the local economy will be about 250 during construction (1982-84), about 60 in 1985, growing to 780 in.1988 and continuing thereaf ter at that level.
Is the 250 estimate a peak or _ average 4
l estimate? What is the basis for these estimates; that is, what was the method (s)'used to calculate these numbers? " Chamber of Commerce" l
information is vaguely referred to in Section 8 and was apparently f
used in various employment sectors (construction, trade, etc.). Wha t j
" Chamber of Commerce" publication (s) is being referred to?
(c) Section 8.1-2, pp. 8-1,
-2, and -3.
The income benefits that are expected to accrue during various project phases are summarized:
(i) Section 8-1.2.1.
It is' stated that $24 million will accrue j
to the local economy from design, construction, and startup 1 n) lh i th b f r this " 0%'
st ate?
j (ii)'Secti.on8-1.2.2 It is stated that "swer the 40-year plant l
lifetime, the total present va1> e of [ induced] income [from a
f operation] is estimated to be $950 million, of which 67 percent would benefit the local. economy." How were these estimates derived?
l l
What discount rate was used? Why "67% to the local economy?"
1 5
..w
.+
e we m+ me
,.r,,
,.nw.
---s
-,,..e,-~,n-nw+e,,
4
-e-
i l (iii) Section 8.1-2.
It is stated that the "second-level employment will amcunt to 28,000 man-years...and will generate income benefits with a current value of $280 million." How were these estimates derived?
I (d) Section 8-1.4, p. 8-5.
It is stated that about $130,000 will be j
paid ar nually for property taxes. This estimate was based on " current l
assessment practices of the Alabama State Tax Commission, present local tax rates, and 20-year average fair market value... assuming no exemption from taxes." Has Westinghouse applied for or been granted any exemptions from any municipal, county, or state taxes? What is the "20-year average fair market value?"
RESPONSE
j a.
The peak construction labor force is estimated to be 400.
The sentence beginning on the 14th line of page 8-7 of the Environmental Report should be revised to read: "In addition, the transportation of about i
400 (peak construction..."
The construction labor and shakedown labor force estimates are based l
on preliminary plant desigr. information.
These estimates cannot be refined until design progresses further, and construction contractors f
are selected. The peak shakedown labor force muld be dependent on
~
actual equipment delivery and installation schedules.
l b.
Induced employment will average about 150 during the construction period, and will peak at about 250.
I Induced employment was estimated using statistics obtained from the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Publication No 2928 What New Jobs Mean to a Cormiunity, copyright 1973 (1 iorary of Congress Card Catalogue No. 73-78146).
i P
.. ~ _..,.
c(i) The 40 percent value was derived as follows:
- ' Total cost 'of the plant is estimated to be $55-65 million.
(This-is made up of the following items: land purchase, site
- preparation, building construction, architect engineer services, equipment design and purchases and, shakedown i
and startup expenses.)
Local benefits are estimated at $20-30 million.
(Theseinclude:
site preparation and building construction, equipment purcht and, shakedown and startup expenses.)
Therefore:
$?0-30 million ss 40%
$55-65 million (ii) The $950 million present value income was estimated by projecting the rate of personnel additions required to attain the' design capacity of 1000 metric tons of uranium (tiTU) per year, throughout the 40 year lifetime of the plant; then,: the total payroll and ma teria1 ' costs were: estimated. Th-is total came to some $944 million over 40 years of plant operation (which was rounded to $950 million).
Of the induced income, 95 percent of the payroll and 20 percent of the material costs are estimated to'be a direct benefit to the local economy.
These come to some $632 million, or some 67 percent of the $950 million as induced income benefits to the local economy.
[These estimates are based on Westinghouse experience and present value (1979) dollars.]
(iii) Total employment over the 40 year projected operation of ANFFP has been estimated tc require some 37,000 man-years of effort.
According to Chamber of Comerce of the USA Publication No. 2928 (referred to in response to item 25a),78 secondary jobs are in4uced for each 100 new industrial workers. Thus, some 28,000 (rounded) man-years of induced secondary jobs are calculated over the 40 years operation of AttFFP.
From the latest Alabama Industrial Relations Employment Statistics (as of August 1979) the average employment incoms per capita was i
$616,910,200 for the first 3 months of the year, for 278,482 peopla in retail business, or an average per capita income of $8861 per year.
__--.___---_,,__,_____m m
m_,s m_--s--,
- -,w m
y qgy--
iw,gwvv,.,amafg y,5,
,-Tw4w vv N99 r wec 89=Dw'Wt9-wwww v w e.ar er wtlu-mw vs'# 9 * * - brf wW F % 'ir-4FW ' $t-tir-1 f 4lirt'WVif fWWM'
1 t
1 1
4-1 Given that this income is escalated at'a compound rate of 7 percent per year for the two. years prior:to plant opening, and. thst'. this vclue is 'to be applied over the 40 years. operating period of.' the.
plant, the total " current value" is $280 millicn for secondary l
-level. employment.
d.
Westinghouse intends to pay.its fair share of taxes..The: "20-year '
average fair market value'.' was. simply one of the terms (alon'g with loc 31 tax rate) in a; formula ~ used -to calculate the gross.estimat2 -
l of what taxes might amount.to, in the ' original' submittal of the i
~
4 i
Environmental Report.
i
'.(
. i.
i
)
.i I
l 5
i 4,
r f.;
F i
i i
}
l I
1 i
i 1
- I e
..~.... - -, _..
m
+..
...-,,-.-s
-.*-3,
.--,-c.na--
......,.,av,
-,w...,,,--~,..
.,,w.,,.r..a,.,
I
. ~
l f
/
- g~,
t a
t 9
'26.
-(e) vihat'is - the status. of permits-required by the Alabama Air Pollu_ tion Control Cominission fur of,eration of potentially air-contaminating new sources and those required by the Alabama ' Health Department's g
Solid Waste Divielon for treatmenc,' storage, and disposal of waste?
(b).. What is'the current status for the application of the NPDES permit?
Please provide correspondence between Westinghouse and the State's-officials in regard to the NPDES pennit application.
RESPONSE
a.
On October 27, 1978 - six months before the public announcement on l
April 11,1919 of plans to construct an Alabama Nuclear Fuel Fabrication Phnt :(ANFF) -~ Westinghouse representatives F Cellier (ANFFP Project '
Manager), B. A. Kerns (Mar,ager Environmental Control Construction '
I' Technology,', and R. A. Williams:(ANFFP Engineer), met with Alabama Health Department representatives J. Coopc-/R. Grusnick (Air Pollution
. Control Commis ion), A. Chipley' (Solid Waste and t'ector Control), C. Horn / -
{
E. Hughes (Water Improvement Commission), and A:. Codwin/K. Whatley (Radiological Health Division). The purpose cf this meeting was to discuss (in general terms) licenses, permits, and other approvals-required for industries locating in Alabama.
In add' tion to general information, Westinghouse representatives were given:
" Air Pollution Control Commission Rules and Regulations";
" Criteria, Policies, and Administrative Procedures of the Alabama Water Improvement Commission Concerning the. Issuance of Waste Discharge Permits to Industrial Applicants";
" Alabama Regulations for Control of Radiation".
On September 5-6, 1979, Westinghouse representatives F. Cellier, R. E. Wills (Cour.sel), W. S. Geiger (ANFFP Engineer) and R. A. Williams, met wi th Alabama Health Lepartment representatives J. Cooper /R. Cowne/R. Gore /
l S. Robertson (Air Pollution Control Commission), A. Chipley/D. Cooper
{
(Solid Waste and Vector Contro'), C. Horn /J. Poole (Water Improvement Commission), and W.' Willis/A. Godwin/J. McNees/Vs. Whatley (Radiological I
Health Division).
The_ purpose of this meeting was to discuss (in specific l
term) licenses, permits and other approvals required for ANFFP - including o
c.
e
- ee wehe.
- e
.-4 ee*. =s is,e w F
acquisition of'ldtest application forms and estima.tes of lead times required by each agency for review and approval of relevant applications. Westinghouse representatives were given:
Form APC-100:
" Facility Identification";
Form APC-101:
" Indirect Heating Equipment";
.m APC-102:
" Manufacturing or Processing Operations";
Fom APC-103:
" Refuse Disposal";
~
Fonn APC-108:
" Storage and Handling of Hydrocarbons";
Form APC-110:
" Application for Pemit to Construct Air Pollution Centrol Device";
" State of Alabama Rules and.egulations for Solid Waste Management";
" Procedure to Follow in Requesting Approval for Sanitary Landfill";
"Nat:onal Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Pemit Regulations of the Alabama Water Improvement Commission";
EPA Fom 7550-23:
"flational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Application for Permit to Discharge ' Wastewater";
Fom RM: " Application for Radioactive Material License";
Fom RH-313R:
"Ap,olication for Radioactive Material License - Use of Sealed Sourcas in Radioagraphy";
Fom: " Registration of Sources of Radiation".
Also, each agency gave estimates, ranging from one to six months, of lead times required for application reviews and approvals; and, each agency requested a copy of the AttFFP Environmental Report (when submitted to NRC) for review and additional input relating to application reviews and approvals (ifany).
On January 2,1930, copies of the AitFFP Environmental Report were sent to:
Mr. James W.
Cooper, Director, Alabama Air Pollution Control Connission; Hr. Alfred S. Chipley, Director, (Alabama) Division of Solid Waste
& Vector Control; Mr. Charles P,. Horn, Chief I.W.C.S., Alabama Water Improvement Cocmission; and, copies of the ANFFP Lican;e Application and Environmental Report were sent to:
Mr. Aubrey V. Godwin, Director,. ( Alabama) Division of Rsdiological health.
On June 6,1930, F. Cellier received a letter from A. Chipley (Attachment 26.1) which announced availability of draf t regulations pertaining to the management of hazardous wastes in Alabama.
p
-3' b.
- 0n March 4,1980, F. Cellier received a. letter from J. 'Poole (Att'achment 26.2)
N
.which:
Acknowledged. review of the.ANFFP. Environmental Report; Gave three comments to be considered when~the engineering.
- report-(to accompany the NPDES pennit application) is prepared; Enclosed latest. copies of-procedures and forms for NPDES permit application.
As comitt,ed'in Section 9 of the. ANFFP Environmental Report, Westinghouse will continue to work closely with State authorities to assure that all licenses, permits'and other authorizations'are obtained well in advance
~
of the dates' tha't' they will "actually ~ be needed. -
l r
4 1
~
.e w
..-e-*
~
l
-(
ATTACHMENT 26.1 State of Alabama 3
Department of Public Health
[,'
.:i /
- i p
Montgomery, Alabama moi.
State Office Building ll
~
1 aA L, u n as,M. o.
June 6' 1980
$ TATE H EALTH OF FICEa 8
Mr. F. Cellier Westinghouse Electric Corporatign P.. O.. Box 355 Pittsburg, Pennsylvania 15230
Dear Mr. Collier:
The Alabama Department of Public Health, Division of Solid Waste and Vector Control, has completed its regulations pertaining to the canagement of hazardous. wastes.
The regulations are now available in draft form for pubdc comment.
Copies of the regulations are available for in-house review at the following locations:
Mobile Public Library, Mobile University of South Alabama Library, Mobile Birminghac Public Library, Birmingham University of Alabama Library, University Houston Memorial Library, Dothan Auburn University Library, Auburn Huntsville Public Library, Huntsville Florence-Lauderdale Public Library, Florence Cadsden Public Library, Cadsden Phenix City Public Library, Phenix City Anniston-Calhoun County Public Library, Anniston Decatur Public Library, Decatur Carnegie Library, Selma
)
Fairhope Public Library, Fait'N Troy State University Library, toy Division of Solid Waste Office, Montgomery A public hearing will be held on July 15, 1980, at 10:00 a.m. In Room 200 of the State Office Building in Montgomery, Alabana. Anyone desiring to be heard may appear at the hearing. This agency, however, requests that any person wishing to aake an oral statement at the hearing furnish the hearing officer with copies of his stat ment, if at all possible.
An effort will be cade to give each person who wishes to speak an opportunity to do so; however, the Division of Solid Waste reserves the right to limit the lenth of each presentation in neder to allow all parties to testify.
~
d c,
June 6,.1980..
j Page 2 Those persons wisting to submit oral testimony at the hearing may notify the.
Division of Solid Waste of'their intent and will be scheduled according to the order in which'the request is received. 0thers who register at the' hearing will
'be heard in the order in which they register.
The hearing record wjll be held open until July 30,1980, -at 5:00 p.m. ' for receiving written comer.is on the proposed regulations.
Copies of.the draft regulations may be purchased from the Division of Solid t
W ste at a cost'of $6.00.per copy. ' Checks or money orders should be made payable to the State Health. Department.
We look forward to your input.and comments on these regulations.
Sincerely,
.Jfrpgor Alfre S. Chipley, Division of Solid Wast (& Vector Control
' Environmental Health Administration ASC:TGM:bw I
1 e
_ _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _,, j
i STATE OF'AL'ABA4x
, ATTACHMENT-26.2
- WATER IMPROVE 31ENT' CO3D11SSION
. x m ~-
-S/
Cornmission PAerr geru f ra t.. FA yers, ht.O.
Chiirman. State Healtn of ficer Taney A. Brageal, Sr., Fairnope Charles O Cargile. Hueytown 4-1 Frank E. Undstroen, Sr., Birmingham Pichard A. Forste'r \\
s
'D""*NNU W. Jon n H. Wes' ton, Jr., #Aontgornery Vice Cha.rrnan
I f N[
'% da"..
Commissioner, Department of f
Conservation and Natural Resources PAalling addressa State Mce Meng Perry Hul Of fice Park "DO*M' O 30 M James W.Warr.
3216 intoestate Court PAontgomery, Alanama
. Directo'
- Telephone 205/277 3630 March 4, 1980-Mr. F. Cellier Manager ANFFP Project Wectinghouse Electric Corporation-Nuclear Fuel Division Post Office Box 355 Pittsburg, PA 15230
Dear Mr. Cellier:
The Environmental Report in support of the proposed Nuclear Fuel Plant in Prattville, Alabama has been reviewed. The following are comments generated:
during the review which may not be germane to the environmental report, but-should be considered when the engineering report to accompany the NPDES permit ~
application is prepared.
"i 1.
Layouts of the facilities shown in figure's 3.6 through 3.9 showing i
dikes, curbs, and other best management practices should be presented.
4 2.
A means of flow ceasurement and sample collection should be provided-for each discharge.
3.
Is the expected treatment ef ficiency (3-3.2.4) based on plant experience, treatability studies, or some combination thereof?
To assist in permit application a copy of our procedures c4 copies of EPA Form 7550-23 are attached. - If additional information is requ! red during preparation of the permit application, please contact me.
Yours very truly, vn 0 C
dohnA.Poola,[r.
Engineer, Technical Staff JAP:ppr Water Impeoment Cornission Enclosures
't
./
'f
'l
-27.
(ER: Appendix B; p. B-2),
The staff knows of no biological inyestigation procedures that have
'been reviewed and approved'by Oak' Ridge National Laboratory.
Please comment.
RESPONSE
This statement was taken directly from reference 3, page 38, para 4, of our' Consultant's (EIA) report. b)- EIA performed an environmental evaluation on' the-Memphis Light &. Water Co. Coal Gasification Project; and, ORNL (which was preparing the Environmental Impact Statement) assessed EIA's biological sampling methods to assure that they were based on up-to-date, approved scientific methods.
l
. ~. -
_ _ _. _ _.. _. _.,. _.. _,. _, ~
4 u'
o 28.
Enginetring Questions
~
(a) For the Direct Conversion Process to be used at the Prattville Plant provide operating data sufficient to establish:
(i)' HF losses to scrubber (ii).If the HF is unacceptable for sale, what is the alternative disposal method? -
(b) The cation-anion balance appears to be in error for neutral waste.. Please clarify.
(Section.3-3.2.4,p.3-2.3)
.(c) Please provide the rationale for the tource terms on radiological and chemical effluents for potential accidental release involving the conversion kiln operations.
(d). Please estimate the maximum capacity of wet scrap recovery.
(e) Please estimate the annual usage at maximum operation capacf ty-of all materials on T'ab'.e 5-4.
(f) Provide range of plant operating hours per year at full production.
(g) Describe the UF v p rizattu.' operation.
Include:
6 (i) Method of cylinder transport and process connections.
(ii) Normal and maximum cylinder operating temperatures.
(iii) Number of cylinders hot at one time.
(iv) The containment h&: sing, erergency scrubber capability.
In effect, justify the statements on page 5-151.1 sufficient detail for independent evaluation by the staff.
(h) Please provide infc,1ation and rationale to justify the source of accidental reb
.5 such as from a criticality accident involving i
the UNH production -gerations.
RESPONSE
(a)
(i) Based on the current HF condenser design, some 95% of the HF will be recovered as (nominally) 55 w/o hydrofluoric acid. The remainder of the HF will be scrubbed by NaOH. The annual HF loss to the 4
scrubber is estimated at some 2.2 y ;0 Kg. (approximately 50,000 pounds).
4 l
-,~.
=M$u 9
gga*r+-f'-y-
- g wp ebr SW7 O"pis 3
- e. -eiewyp-e,w
- si*f M.=,&gg.ew si 9 9. %,-,rggPre g-gg W, gyg rm g
p,y yW-g y -gg ny we'h-gp g, p g, W g
.gg.
g qq ga gg
.h,--p.-ge p ygpwyg grt.sq'*
'pe, (ii)
It is intended that the HF be licensed ter recycle as a valuable resource (e.g., sale); otherwise, the HF will have to be neutralized withCa(0H)2 and the product (CaF ) dried and buried in valuable 2
space at a licensed low level waste burial site.
(b)
It is agreed that the ionic concentration presented in Section 3-3.2.4
- p. 3-2.3 cannot be combined to show neutral discharges. This is not the intent at this point. This section is simply intended to show that the pH range will be maintained (as stated) by adding sufficient sulfuric acid to attain teceptable effluent discharge levels.
(c) The source term for airborne releases from the postulated ac.cident associated with a leak from overfilling ki'n hoppers is based on one hours' throughput of a kiln; the (incrediblej explosive tyoe accident hypothesized utilizes tne total quantity of material in the kiln and chamber (at any one time) as the source term for airborne release.
(d) The estimated naximum capacity of wet scrap recosery is 15 to 30 f.lTU/ year.
(e) The following represents the estimated annual usage fnr the chemicals listed in Table 5-4(d):
Storage Chemical Inventory Annual Use litric Acid 6,000 gallons 14,000 gallons Hydrogen 60,000 gallons 510,000 gallons fiitrogen 60,000 gallons 730,000 gallons Argon (b) 2,500 gallons 32,500 gallons Helium 1.000 gallons 11,500 gallons Uranium Hexafluo-ide 1,100,000 pounds 3,450,000 pounds Uranyl flitrate 20,000 pounds 25,000 pounds L i.ne 110,000 pounds 385,000 pounds Hydrogen Peroxide (b) 5,000 gallons 14,500 gallons Sodium Hydroxide 40,000 gallons 175,000 gallons Water Glass Agent 14,000 pour' 78,000 pounds Stabilizing Agent 54,000 pouni 71,000 pounds Hydrofluoric Acid (c) 40,000 galloas 230,000 gallons Sulfuric Acidfo) 5,000 gallons 50,000 gallons Acetone (b) 350 gallons 1,000 galions Flocculating Agent 2,200 pounds 1,800 pcands Solvent (VAR $0L)(b) 50 gallons 250 gallons Detergent (OAKITE)bJ )
200 pounds 800 pounds Ib Perchlorcethylene(
50 gallons 50 gallons T inc Stearates)e(l')
Dichloronethar 300 gallons 900 gallons b) 2,500 pounds 5,000 pounds (a) Cleaning Age ~t (Ethanol) is no longer being considered for bulk storage (b) Storage inventory adjusted to most recent estimates.
(c) HF is a product (as opposed to a raw material); thus, the 230,000 gallons is actually the cnqual production, with 40,000 gallons being the I
accumulated inventory prior to shipment.
1 I
1 3
_3 (f) The' intent is to operate the plant 365 days per year, 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day, when at maximum capacity. (giving 8760 hours0.101 days <br />2.433 hours <br />0.0145 weeks <br />0.00333 months <br /> / year), except for a potential one week' plant shutdown per year for vacation (giving 8592 hours0.0994 days <br />2.387 hours <br />0.0142 weeks <br />0.00327 months <br /> /yr).
(g)
(i)
Cylinder transport and process connections:
UF cylinders will be transported from the UF. storage area to 6
6 the SNM Building UF bay via lift truck.
6 e
The cylinders will then be installed in.a vaporizer, using an overhead crane.
A cylinder will be connected to its process header by flexible copper tubing. When the cylinder has reached process temperature -
will be delivered and pressure (using hot water spray), the UF6 to the process by opening the cylinder valve.
When a cylinder which is supplying the conversion system is.
as to no longer maintain a supply sufficiently depleted of UF6 pressure above 5 psig, it will be disconnectej from the supply line and valved into a cold trap evacuation system for removal of residual UF6 (to an aueptable final heel of less than 20 pounds).
Ha.al removal is accomplished by evacuating the cylinder with a i
vacuum pump through an exhaust train, consisting of a cold trap system with self contained refrigeration (-65 F) to condense UF vapor, and two final series chemical absorber (Al 0 ) traps 6
23 for the capture of any final traces of UF
- 6 Upon completion of the evacuation process, the cylinur will be removed from the '.'aporizer, and transferred by crane to the cylinder scales.
The cylinder will be weighed to assure.that the residual heel is equal to (or less than) 20 pounds.
(ii) fionnal cylinder operating temperature:
70*C-90 C Maximum cylinder operating temperature:
95*C (iii) i;ormal (75% of the time)
- 5 cylinders (HOT)
Change over (25% of the time) -10 cylinders (HOT)
~
,,,,- g w.
sol-e.,.
?
,,-g,,w.+-9-w y
.-%,s a
y em
,,pe.wm,*wg'.
,q, o y my w.wp,wg ye we he*G
+4'G Ww O'58 9 9 9-9 F*f 4'96#*tT'W