ML20148A696
| ML20148A696 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry, North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 03/28/1997 |
| From: | Kopp L NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Edison G NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML082490708 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-97-99 NUDOCS 9705090117 | |
| Download: ML20148A696 (2) | |
Text
-_
b l
From:
Laurence Kopp NRr; To:
gee Cu 4,.s L A,,,,,,,,,pp.
Date:
3/28/97 9:01am
Subject:
70.24 exemptions i.
l Based on the recent agreements between NRR and NMSS, the attached adt.uonal responses are needed from licensees to grant exemptions to 70.24. Surry & No. Anna may have already been asked the 2nd question.
l l
l i
x,. n ().
' WILLIAMS 97-99 PDR
L
.5 1)-
Verification that at least one radiation monitor and criticality alarm that meets the detection criteria (paragraph 5.6) and sensitivity criteria (paragraph 5.7) in ANSl/ANS 8.3-1986 is provided in those areas where fresh reactor fuel is handled, moved,'or may be present outside of fixed racks and containers (except during movement between the new fuel storage racks, the reactor vessel, and the spent fuel pool). In determining the detection capability of the monitor, a neutron-to-gamma dose (measured in rads) ratio of 0.3 should be assumed. Double coverage of all areas would not be required, but single reliable coverage of handling areas and a low false alarm rate are needed.
2)
Discussion of training provided to personnelin responding to area radiation monitors or portable systems.
I i
1
' l b
i h
1 i
1 h
i t
4 4
c r
-