ML20147F394
| ML20147F394 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 02/29/1988 |
| From: | Harrison J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20147F399 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8803070340 | |
| Download: ML20147F394 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000454/1988003
Text
g
jg
- -
-
- -
-
-,
y-
fjn
.
>
- 1
4
..
FEB 2 91988
~'
Docket No.-50-454
~
Docket No. 50-455-
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATTN:
Mr. Cordell Reed
Senior Vice President
Post Office Box 767
Chicago, IL 60690
Gentlemen:
This refers to"the,special safety inspection conducted by Mr. A. S. Gautam
and other NRC_ representatives of this. office on January 11 through February 17,
1988, of activities at the Byron Nuclear Power Station, Unite 1 and 2,
authorized by NRC-Licenses No. NPF-37 and No. NPF-66 and to the discussion
of our findings with Mr. K. Ainger at the conclusion of the inspection.
This inspection of the Byron Environmental Qualification (EQ) program was
performed to verify compliance to 10 CFR 50.49.
The enclosed copy.of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representa*,ive records, observations, and
interviews with pe?scnne'.
During this inspection, u ctain of your activities appeared to be in violation
of NRC requireaents, as described in the enclosed Notice.
The inspection
confirmed that action had been taken to correct the identified violation and
to, prevent recurrence.
Our understanding of your correctiva actions are
described in Paragraph 3a of the enclosed inspection report.
Consequently, no
reply to the violation is reouired and we have no further questions regarding
this matter at this time.
Although the inspection determined that you have implemented a program to
meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.49, two significant deficiencies in the
program implementation were observed.
These findings are classified as
Potentially Enforceable / Unresolved Items and an ongoing NRC review is being
performed t evaluate these findings in regard to possible future enforcement
actions.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
in the NRC Public Document Room.
P
G
-
,
,
.
,
-
3
y
. Commonwealth Edison Company:
. 2_
FEB)91933
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
subject to the.' clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget
r
as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,.PL 96-511.
.We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this' inspection.
Sincerely,
~trigt;dSig.:3 l" b 'l* !
' ' " "
J. J. Harrison, Chief
Engineering Branch
Enclosure:
Inspection Reports
No. 50-454/88003(DRS);
No. 50-455/88003(DRS)
cc w/ enclosure:
T. J. Maiman, Vice President,
PWR Operations
~D.
Butterfield, Nuclear
Licensing Manager
R. E. Querto, Plant Manager
DCD/DC3 (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector,.RIII 8yron
Resident Inspector, RIII
Braidwood
D. W.=Cassel, Jr., Esq.
Richard Hubbard-
J. W. McCaffrey, Chief,'Public
Utilities Division
Diane Chavez, DAARE/ SAFE
L. 01shan, NRR LPM
H. S. Taylor, Quality Assurance
.
Division
U. Potapovs, NRR
M. Jacobus', Sandia
i
RIII
RIII
II
RIII
R II
A
W5V
D4Y
?%.s*
VW
Gautam/ jaw
Kopp
Winds
Gardn r
ris
L
>l2flfJ
sl2 8/iY
bl.t& S8
du f s'
'L9
b
J
f[/
l
.
w
rr
-