ML20147D789

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Supplemental Response to Integrated Design Insp Item D4.3-7,per Insp Repts 50-325/87-48 & 50-328/87-48
ML20147D789
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/1988
From: Michael Ray
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
Shared Package
ML20147D794 List:
References
NUDOCS 8803040166
Download: ML20147D789 (5)


Text

.

l TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY -l CH ATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 374o1 l SN 105B Lookout Place )

MAR 2 1988 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-ientlemen:

In the Matter of ) Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority ) 50-328 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN) - INTEGRATED DESIGN INSPECTION (IDI) - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-327/87-48 AND 50-328/87-48 Enclosed is TVA's supplemental response to IDI item D4.3-7. It is our-understanding that the information provided herein completes TVA's actions on this item for SQN unit 2 restart.

If you have any questions, please telephone D. L. Williams at (615) 632-7170.

Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY k

M. J. Ra Deputy tor Nuclear L censing and Regulatory Affairs Enclosure ec: See page 2 l

8803040166 880302 1

PDR ADOCK 05000327 ,

0 -..DCD' g(

An Equal Opportunity Employer

_ ~

U.S. Nuclear Re5ulatory Commission h4AR 21988 Enclosure cc-(Enclosuro):

Mr. K. P. Barr, Acting Assistant Director for Inspection Programs TVA Projects Division U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marletta Street, NW, Suite 2900-

' Atlanta, Goorgia 30323 Mr. G. C. Zech, Assistant Director for Projects TVA Projects Division U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint, North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852 Sequoyah Fasident Inspector Sequoyah Nuclaar Plant 2600 Igou Ferry Road Soddy Daisy, Tenneesec 37379 a

. - . ... -. . . - - . . . ~ - . - . . _ . --

P P

ENCLOSURE SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR: PLANT-ITEM NU::1"'R: D4.3-7 TITLE: Roof Flexibility

SUMMARY

>0F ITEM:

The seismic design of the auxiliary building roo*fsystem assumed the ecof to be rigid and used the corresponding. vertical acceleration from the response spectra. -However, it is not a rigid structure and should not be analyzed that way. ,

CLASSIFICATION: Minor Calculation Error SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE:

During the course of the IDI review, the issue of auxiliary building roof A' separate concern was raised by NRC system seismic design was resolved.

during this review regarding TVA's use of two-thirds of the horizontal.

response spectra for the vertical motion of the diesel generator building. In response to this concern, TVA has seismically reanalyzed the diesel generator building structure and performed an evaluation to demonstrate that the

~

equipment and piping can safely perform their design function during a seismic event. The results of these analyses and. evaluation were discussed with the NRC reviewer during the inspection held in Knoxville, Tennessee, February 15 through 19, 1988.

i . .

l To close this' finding, the following infonmation is provided for final review:

1) Attachment 1 presents a seismic analysis report, "Development of Seismic Acceleration Response Spectra for Diesel Generator Building for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant," documenting the earthquake analysis of the Diesel Generstor Building for a site-specific earthquake (84th percentile). Calculations are documented by branch identifier SCG CSG 88-108,
2) Attachment 2 contains a summary of the piping and support-load stress changes based upon evaluation performed with the seismic response spectra of item 1. Calculations are identified by RIMS No.

B25 880226 800.

3) Attachment 3 describes the test spectrum used.in the qualification of equipment in the diesel generator building and a comparison of this spectrum with the analysis spectra of item 1. This is documented by RIMS No,'B41 880227 003. -

' There is no impact on safety, and no hardware changes are required. No further action is required to resolve this item.

= - + -, -- , -,- w -

m- -,e- -

w ,n-e+ e e-- ,me-e- ---- --

i Attachment 1 I

Bechtel North American Power Corporation Engineers-Constructors I e Falty Beate Street

  • San Francisco Cal.fornia j Mail Address: P O Box 3965. San Francesco. CA 94119 February 26, 1988 l

Mr. Earl Stone Tennessee Valley Authority W9 D207 C-K ~

Knoxville, Tennessee 37902

Subject:

Task 24 - Development of Seismic Acceleration Response Spectra for Diesel Generator Building of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant

Reference:

TVA Contract TV-72104A

Dear Mr. Stone:

We have completed the seismic analysis for the subject task. Enclosed I am transmitting to you a copy of the final, task report, entitled "Task Report on Development of Seismic Acceleration Response Spectra for Diesel Generator Building of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant; Part 1: Design Basis SSE Inputs; Part 2:

Site-Specific OBE & SSE Inputs," dated February 25, 1988, for your use.

If you have any questions regarding the enclosed report, please contact Ven S.

Tseng at Bechtel's San Francisco office (Tol. 415-768-5945).

' Sincerely yours, R. L. Rogers Project Manager RLR/WST/dz Enclosures 2/27/88 - JIO!:BB cc (Enclosures):

'RUIS, SL 26 C-K 0

DOCUMENT REVfEW NOTICE gfN olSCIPLINE Civil / Structural

,, yo, 18968-907 TO CHIEF ENGINEER Civil / Structural IDISC1P LIN E)

THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE SUBM11TED:

i Final. Task Report on "Development of Seismic Acceleration Response Spectra for Diesel Generator or Building of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant" l

Part 1: Design Basis Input 1 Part 2: Site-SpeCfffC OBE & SSE Inputs i

i QU ALITY ENGINEERING REVIEW:

DOES THIS CH ANGE CORRECT ERRORS OR DEFICIENCIES IN THE PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED DESIGN?

@ NO OYES FORWARD COPY OF THE DAN AWO ATTACHMENTS TO THE SUPERVISOR OF QUALITY ENGINEERING IN ACCORDANCE WITH MED/EDP - 4.34.

O INITIAL SUBMITTAL O RESUBMITTAL (ATTACHED COPY OF REVIEW NOTICE FORM PREVIOUSLY SUSMITTED)

REVIEW MADE BY REVIEW TECHNIQUE O GENERAL COMPLI ANCE O COMPARISON WITH PROVEN STANDARDS OF DESIGN

/WI.M.

  • O DETAILED CHECx 0 DESIGN REVIEW uEETiNG INOTES ATTACHED)

STATUS APPROVCD O APPROVED wiTH COMuf NTS isELOW) O NoT-^P'RovEo 4

A Mihn ORIGIN ATOR

$wD:Ta ind/

DATE GRPSdPV DATE PROJ O ENG

//

DATE PROJ ENG

/% NA awe DATE CHICF ENG DATE SFP 20223. nov Vg2 EO 20, REV 3 IW82)

, - . , - . -