ML20141N039

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Weekly Info Rept for Wk Ending 860221
ML20141N039
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/26/1986
From: Rehm T
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To:
References
WIR-860221, NUDOCS 8603030459
Download: ML20141N039 (35)


Text

- _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

9 1

February 26, 1986 For:

The Comissioners From:

T. A. Rehm, Assistant for Operations, Office of the ED0

Subject:

WEEKLY INFORMATION REPORT - WEEK ENDING FEBRUARY 21, 1986 A sumary of key events is included as a convenience to those Comissioners who may prefer a condensed version of this report.

Contents Enclosure Administration A

Nuclear Reactor Regulation B

Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards C

Inspection and Enforcement D

Nuclear Regulatory Research E

Executive Legal Director F*

International Programs G

State Programs H

Resource Management I

Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data J*

Small & Disadvantaged Business Utilization & Civil Rights K*

Regional Offices L

CRGR Monthly Reports M*

Executive Director for Operations N*

Items Addressed by the Comission 0

Meeting Notices p

Proprietary or Other Sensitive Information (Not for Q

external distribution)

  • No input this week.

/ l(

m T. A. Re ssistant for Operations Office of the Executive Director for Operations

Contact:

T. A. Rehm,'EDO 492-7781 8603030459 B60226 COMMS NRCC PDR EEKLYINFOREPT PDR

HIGHLIGHTS OF WEEKLY INFORMATION REPORT WEEK ENDING FEBRUARY 21, 1986 Oconee Nuclear Station. Units Nos. 1. 2 and 3 On Thursday (February 13, 1986) at 06:36 a.m., an earthquake was felt at the Oconee Nuclear Station Units 1, 2 and 3 and its magnitude was estimated at 3.5 on the Richter scale. The earthquake did not damage the nuclear units, set-off any alams, or trigger any of the strong-.

motion instruments.

The units did not trip and continued to operate.

Femi 2 The staff has just received a copy of the initial report by the 1

Independent Overview Comittee transmitting its evaluation of the Fermi 2 management. The subject report presents a sumary of problem areas the Comittee believes have prevented DECO management from achieving the high standards of performance to which DECO is committed. These are: (1) a lack of commercial nuclear operating experience; (2) a lack.

of leadership; (3? a lack of accountability; (4) management ineffectiveness;(5)animbalancedorganizationalstructure;and(6) rigid and cumbersome management systems which are not effective for planning, scheduling and the establishment of schedules.

The subject report also provides six recommendations to improve the DECO organization and the DECO management. The committee states.its belief that its recomendation and the follow up actions by DECO are not prerequisites for startup.

This report was transmitted to Region III by the DECO Board Chairman on February 10, 1986, and released to the public the following day.

J Emergency Planning FEMA conducted a graded exercise at the Shoreham power plant on February 13, 1986.

In addition to the normal NRC region task of observing the licensee onsite portion of the Shoreham exercise, the f1RC provided support to FEMA in ccaducting the exercise. The additional support was for 11 simulators who represented state and local government positions and eight offsite controllers. The logs of these individuals were provided to FEMA shortly after the conclusion of the exercise to be utilized in the development of the FEMA evaluation report which is expected to be available in about 6 weeks.

DOE Monitored Retrievable Storage (MRS)

The Department of Justice has appealed to the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals the decision and injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee regarding the DOE MRS proposal.

Based on a legal suit by the State of Tennessee, the District Court enjoined DOE from submitting the MRS proposal to Congress as the proposal relates to siting studies and the l

recommended sites for the MRS in Tennessee. The appeal requests a summary reversal of the injunction or a stay pending the appeal of the decision.

Early consideration by the Court of Appeals was requested.

l l

FER E 1 g;3

\\

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION Week Ending February 21, 1985 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FREEDOM 0F INFORMATION ACT STATUS OF REQUESTS Initial Appeal of Request Initial Decision Carryovers, 1985 181 15 Received, 1986 99 12 Granted 82 2

Denied 24 0

Pending 174 25 ACTIONS THIS WEEK Received Billie P. Garde, Requests all records developed subsequent to the issuance Government of the August 30, 1985, OIA report about the T-shirt Accountability incident.

Project (86-84)

Billie P. Garde, Requests all records developed in the investigation of Government all EE0 complaints filed by employees of the Office of Accountability Inspector and Auditor (0IA) against employees of the OIA.

Project (86-85)

(NRC employee)

Requests information pertaining to reference checks (86-86) regarding her application for another NRC position.

Rita Wirth, Requests a copy of the Staff Requirements Memo dated Gilbert /

December 31, 1985 concerning the issuance of the proposed Canmonwealth rule on the ITS issue.

(86-87)

Stan A. Huber, Requests copies of the records released under FOIA requests Stan A. Huber Nos. 86-37, 86-44,85-749, 85-484,85-679 and 85-785.

Consultants, Inc.

(86-88)

Robert Todd Requests copies of the entire contents of the file on (86-89)

F01A-84-854 submitted by Mr. Lawrence Fawcett.

(NRC employee)

Requests copies of the position descriptions of all GG-14 (86-90) mechanical engineers in the Plant Systems Branches in the Divisions of PWR-A and BWR.

CONTACT: Donnie H. Grimsley ENCLOSURE A 492-7211 FEB 2 1 1986

2 Received Cont'd Susan L. Hiatt, Requests nine categories of records regarding the OCRE Representative January 31, 1986, earthquake at the Perry nuclear power (86-91) plant.

Lyle Graber, Requests copies of SECY-85-306A and SECY-85-306B.

NUS Corporation (86-92)

(An individual Requests records in the NRC on herself.

requesting information about herself)

(86-93)

Gerard Wrzesinski, Requests a lisc of low level radioactive waste Ray Tech generators ir, the U.S.

Tranrport, Inc.

(86-94)

Timothy R. Dunne, Referral from the FBI of one record regarding Stone Stone & Webster

& Webster Engineering Corporation's security clearance.

Engineering Corp.

(86-95)

(NRCemployee)

Requests all records regarding an OGC investigation.

(86-96)

Joshua Gordon, Requests four categories of records that rate nuclear Critical Mass domestic comercial power plants and utilities according (86-97) to their safety record, operating experience, or management practices and records that rate events or problems encountered at nuclear power plants according to their severity, type, importance, or NRC response.

Charles W. Whitney, Requests copies of the records released to Ms. Laurie Troutman, Sanders, Fowler pursuant to requests F01A-86-42 and F01A-86-43.

Lockerman & Ashmore (86-98)

Charles W. Whitney, Requests all records pertaining to five individuals.

Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & Ashmore (86-99)

John E. Ryan APPEAL TO THE COMMISSION for the lack of response to a (86-A-10-85-735) request for the investigative report on the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 facility concerning nuclear auditor harassments.

Billie P. Garde, APPEAL TO THE ED0 for the lack of response to a request Government for records regarding procedures for loading or unloading Accountability uranium fuel at Kerr-McGee's Sequoyah facility and all Project records received or developed by NRC regarding the (86-A-ll-86-7)

January 4, 1986, accident at that facility.

l ENCLOSURE A FEB 211506

3 Received, Cont'd Janet G. Aldrich, APPEAL TO THE COMMISSION for the lack of response to Polydoroff and a request, on behalf of an NRC employee, for records Miller, P.C.

regarding an EE0 matter.

(86-A-12-85-815)

Granted R.P. Pulec.

In response to a request for a copy of NUREG/CR-4178, C.R. Steinhardt, An Evaluation of Selected Licensee Event Reports Wisconsin Public Prepared Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73, by Bruce S. Anderson, Service Charles F. Miller and Brady M. Valentine, dated March Corporation 1985, made available a copy of the requested record.

(86-65)

Thomas A. Isaacson, In response to a request for copies of all records Howrey & Simon relating to delays or the progress of construction at (86-71) the Bellefonte nuclear power plant, made available 14 records.

Informed the requester that four additional records are already available at the PDR.

Jim Pedro, In response to a request for the totals of the NRC fees NUS Corporation charged for the year 1985 under 10 CFR Part 170 for the (86-77)

McGuire, Salem, Sequoyah, and North Anna nuclear power plants, made available the requested information.

Samuel S. McHard, In response to a request for reports submitted to NRC by Katz, McAndrews, Comonwealth Edison Company, Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric, Durkee, Blach &

or the Quad Cities nuclear generating station regarding Lefstein, P.C.

an electrical explosion at that plant on May 5, 1985, (86-79) made available three records.

Informed the requester that two additional records subject to this request are already available at the PDR.

Rita Wirth, In response to a request for a copy of the Staff Gilbert /

Requirements Memo dated December 31, 1985, regarding Commonwealth, Inc.

the issuance of the proposed rule on the ITS issue, (86-87) informed the requester that this record is already available at the PDR.

Robert Todd In response to a request for the entire contents of (86-89) the file on F01A-84-854 by Mr. Lawrence Fawcett, made available four records.

1 ENCLOSURE A FEB 211986

4 Denied Billie P. Garde, In response to a request for records concerning the NRC Government staff's review of the Quadrex Corporation's analysis of Accountability the South Texas plant, including all infomation that the Project staff relied upon in performing the analy<.is'.of the (85-519)

Quadrex Report, as well as the facts and circumstances under which the staff learned of the Quadrex Report and any evaluation of the same, made available 92 records.

Informed the requester that additional records subject to this request are already available at the PDR. Denied one record in its entirety containing predecisional advice, opinions, and recommendations of the staff. Denied portions of 23 records, release of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of perscnal privacy and would identify confidential sources.

Edward A. Firestone, In response to a request for several categories of General Electric records regarding pressure suppression containment, Company made available over nine boxes of records.

Informed (85-665) the requester that additional records subject to this request are already available at the PDR. Denied six records in their entirety containing information submitted by and received in confidence from foreign sources.

Denied portions of four records, disclosure of which would cause a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

Steven C. Sholly, In response to a request for copies of all containment MHB Technical analyses and source term estimates for the Shoreham Associates nuclear power plant and all records concerning the (85-772)

" Source Term Code Package" related to NUREG-0956, made available 47 records. Denied one record in its entirety, the release of which would tend to inhibit the open and frank exchange of ideas essential to the deliberative process.

ENCLOSURE A FEB 211986

d WEEKLY INFORMATION REPORT DIVISION OF CONTRACTS WEEK ENDING FEBRUARY 21, 1986 RFP ISSUED RFP No.: RS-ORM-86-264

Title:

" Development of the Corporate Data Network"

==

Description:==

The contractor will develop sh.ared data basce utilizing the Data Base Management System package IDMS/R ans strategic data planning and informatien engineering methodologies.

Period of Performance: Three years Sponsor: Office of Resource Management Status: Closing date has been extended to March 14, 1986.

RFP No.: RS-RG2-86-358

~~

Title:

" Region II Data entry Support Services"

==

Description:==

Perform ADP Data Entry and ad hoc report retrieval activities at NRC Region II.

Period of Pe:formance: 24 months Sponsor: Region II Status: RFP issued February 5, 1986.

Proposals due March II, 1986.

PROPOSALS UNDER EVALUATION RFP No.: RS-0IE-85-156

Title:

" Technical Assistance in Developing and Implementing Programs and Procedures for Reactors Requiring Special Inspection Resources"

==

Description:==

The objective of this project is to provide technical assistance to the NRC for activities pertaining to problem reactors during construction and operation, including development of an NRC program that standardizes inspection procedures for significant problem areas and emergency outages, and assisting in inspections.

Period of Performance: Three years Sponsor: Office of Inspection & Enforcament Status: Negotiations reopened February 18, 1986. Best and Final offers due February 21, 1986.

RFP No.:

RS-OIE-85-158

Title:

" Technical Assistance in Developing and Implementing Programs and Procedures for Inspection of Operating Reactors During Major Outages"

==

Description:==

The objective of this project is to provide technical assistance to the NRC for activities pertaining to planned outages of operating reactors. This includes the development of standardized inspection procedures as well as providing assistance to the regional offices for conducting inspections.

Period of Performance: Three years Sponsor: Offige of Inspection & Enforcement Status: Negotiations reopened February 19, 1986. Best and Final offers due February 25, 1986.

i ENCLOSURE A FEB 211986

OFFICE Lc NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION l' EMS OF INTEREST Week Ending February 21, 1986 Palo Verde Unit 1 We were informed on Friday (February 14,1986) that the licensee issued a press release on Thursday stating that Unit I was declared commercial following a 100 hour0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br /> run above 95% power. The power ascension test program was completed on January 25, 1986 with the performance of the natural circulation cooldown test. The unit is currently at 100% power.

Oconee Nuclear Station, Units Nos. 1, 2 and 3 On Thursday (February 13, 1986) at 06:36 a.m., an earthquake was felt at tb, Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 and its magnitude was est'.nated at 3.5 on the Richter scale. The earthquake did not damage thr. nuclear units, set-off any alarms, or trigger any of the strong mr tion instruments.

T'e units did not trip and continued to operate.

F rmi 2 i

The staff has just received a copy of the initial report by the Independent Overview Committee transmitting its evaluation of the Fermi 2 management. The subject report presents a summary of problem areas the Committee believes have prevented DECO management from achieving the high standards of performance to which DECO is committed. These are: (1) a lack of commercial nuclear operating experience; (2) a lack of leadership; (3) a lack of accountability; (4) management ineffectiveness; (5) an imbalanced organizational structure; and (6) rigid and cumbersome management systems which are not effective for planning, scheduling and the establishment of schedules.

The subject report also provides six recommendations to improve the DECO organization and the DEC0 management. The committee states its belief that its recommendation and the follow up actions by DECO are not prerequisites for startup.

This report was transmitted to Region III by the DECO Board Chairman on February 10, 1986, and released to the public the following day.

ENCLOSURE B FEB 21 '986

  • Catawba Units 1 and 2 On February 14, 1986, Duke Power Company conducted a ground breaking ceremony for the new Catawba Technical Training Center. This Center will provide the training, qualification and periodic requalification of operators in accordance with NRC requirements.

Construction of the Center will be completed June 1, 1987, and the simulator will be installed November 30, 1987. The simulator hardware will consist of primary and backup simulation computers and a complete operating duplicate of the Catawba Unit 1 control boards.

It will be able to simulate up to 300 plant malfunctions including several simultaneously. The simulator contractor is Westinghouse Electric Corporation.

Limerick Intervenor R. L. Anthony continues to participate in Limerick's licensing activities with a recent petition to the Commission, a letter to the NRC staff, and comments on two Federal Register notices relating to issuance of amendments to the Limerick license. All of these filings relate to two requests for amendment of the Limerick Technical Specifications to extend the surveillance intervals on certain containment isolation valves by no more than 14 weeks.

A Licensing Board has been appointed. Further significant events will be reported as they occur.

FEB 211986 ENCLOSURE B l

4 NRC TMI-2 CLEANUP PROJECT DIRECTORATE WEEKLY STATUS REPORT i

WEEK ENDING FEBRUARY 21, 1986 4

1.

DEFUELING 4

As of February 24, 1986,-16 defueling canisters have been transferred from the reactor vessel to the spent fuel pool storage racks. Total weight of fuel debris and structural material.

I transferred out of the reactor vessel is about 12,500 lbs. The estimated total: weight of fuel debris and. structural materials originally in the reactor vessel after the accident was 308,000 lbs.

I Defueling continued with filling fuel canisters with the j

spade-bucket tool. Each of the six most recently filled defueling i

canisters contains a net fuel debris weight of over 1,100 lbs. The licensee's target is to fill one fuel canister each day. However, this target has been achievable only at times when visibility in the reactor was relatively good.

The bio-organism growths in the reactor vessel is severely affecting visibility. The only reactor water cleanup system currently available to the licensee is the Temporary Reactor Coolant FiltrationSystem(TRCFS). This system started operation on 4

February 15, 1986. Operation of the system is limited to times when no defueling is taking place. Otherwise, the fine particles stirred i

up by defueling would adhere to the filter media and rapidly j

increase the dose rate from the filter assembly. By February 20, l

1986, the system has run for over 45 hours5.208333e-4 days <br />0.0125 hours <br />7.440476e-5 weeks <br />1.71225e-5 months <br /> and processed about 150,000 gallons of reactor water. Until a permanent method to' l

respond to the bio-organism growth problem, the operation of the l

TRCFS is essential for defueling to continue.-

2.

PLANT STATUS i

The reactor remains in long tenn cold shutdown, vented to atmosphere.

The reactor vessel head is in storage on the 347' elevation. The pienem is on its storage stand in the deep end of the fuel transfer I

canal. A dam is installed between the deep and shallow ends of the transfer canal, permitting a 20 foot depth (about 5 feet over the top of the plenum).

~

Reactor Coolant System (RCS) cooling is by natural heat loss to the

]-

reactor building atmosphere. Calculated reactor decay heat is near i

10.7 kilowatts.

Incore thermocouple readings range from.71*F to 96 F, averaging 81*F.

The average reactor building temperature is 50 F.

The reactor r

building airborne activity at the defueling platform is 6.7 i

E-8 uCi/cc Tritium and 5.4 E-11 UCi/cc particulates, predominately l

Cesium-137.

The reactor vessel and modified internal indexing fixture are flooded to the 327'6" elevation which-is 151 feet above the core l

region top. The defueling platform is mounted above the internals indexing fixture.

f 4

l FEB 211986 ENCLOSURE B

3.

WASTE MANAGEMENT The Submerged Demineralizer System (SDS) commenced processing batch 127, Fuel Transfer Canal Recycle through both trains.

EPICOR II remained shutdown.

Total volume processed through SDS to date is 3,682,029 gallons, and the total volume processed through EPICOR II is 2,822,963 gallons.

4.

DOSE REDUCTION / DECONTAMINATION Average general area radiation dose rate is 40 mrem per hour on the 347' level of the reactor building and is 67 mrem per hour on the 305' level of the reactor building. The average dose rate to uorkers on the defueling work platform is 8 mrem per hour.

5.

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sample analysis results show TMI site liquid effluents to be in accordance with regulatory limits, NRC requirements, and the City of Lancaster Agreement.

TMI water samplas taken by EPA at the plant discharge to the river consisted of seven daily composite samples taken from February 1 through February 8, 1986. A gamma scan detected no reactor related activity.

The Lancaster water sample taken at the water works intake and analyzed by EPA consisted of a seven day composited sample taken from February 2 through February 8,1986. A gamma scan detected no reactor related radioactivity.

The NRC outdoor airborne particulate sampler at the TMI site collected a sample between February 12, and February 19, 1986. No reactor related radioactivity was detected. Analysis showed Iodine-131 and Cesium-137 concentrations to be less than the lower limits of detectability.

6.

REACTOR BUILDING ACTIVITIES Initial defueling of the reactor core is in progress.

7.

AUXILIARY AND FUEL HANDLING BUILDING ACTIVITIES Installation of the balance of Defueling Water Cleanup System (DWCS) and canister dewatering system continued.

Spent Fuel Pool "A" has been flooded to a depth of about 20 feet (about 6 feet above the top of the fuel canister storage racks).

Preparations are being made for decontamination in the Seal Injection Room, 281' auxiliary building.

FEB 211986 ENCLOSURE B

o -

l 1

e 8.

E,RCEVALUATIONSINPROGRESS Technical Specification Change Request number 49.

Recovery Operations Plan Change number 31.

SDS Technical Evaluation and System Description Update.

Core Stratification Sample Safety Evaluation.

Defueling Water Cleanup System Technical Evaluation Report, Revision 7.

Containment Air Control Envelope Technical Evaluation Report, Revision 5.

Solid Waste Facility Technical Evaluation Report.

Reactor Building Sump Criticality Safety Evaluation Report.

4 l

FEB 211986 ENCLOSURE 8' 4

- O OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS Items of Interest Week Ending February 21, 1986 Near-Term NRC Actions Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA)

Section: 121(a) of NWPA:

EPA Final HLW Standards Status:

Staff briefed the ACRS on January 15, 1986 on proposed revisions to 10 CFR Part 60 for conformance to EPA HLW standards.

(40 CFR Part 191)

~~

Action:

The proposed revisions to Part 60 are scheduled to be submitted to the Commission late February 1986 for approval.

Section:

141(b) of NWPA:

Comments on MRS Proposal Status:

Staff comments on the MRS proposal (SECY-86-9) were approved by Commission on February 5, 1986 and transmitted to DOE.

Action:

NRC comments were to be submitted by DOE with the proposal to Congress on February 7, 1986.

However, a permanent injunction issued for the State of Tennessee has indefinitely delayed the submission of the MRS proposal to Congress.

Section:

141(d) of NWPA:

Licensing of MRS Status:

NRC has developed revisions to 10 CFR Part 72 to provide the licensing framework for the MRS, should it be authorized by Congress.

Action:

The proposed rule on 10 CFR Part 72 was submitted to the Commission (SECY-85-374) on November 15, 1985 and is awaiting Commission approval.

Secticn:

223 of NWPA:

Joint Notice of Technical Assistance Status:

NRC and DOE must annually update a joint notice in the Federal Register i

stating that the United States is prepared to cooperate and provide technical assistance to non-nuclear weapon states in the field of spent fuel storage and disposal.

1 Action:

The third annual joint update is currently being prepared for publica-tion in early April 1986.

ENCLOSURE C FEB 211986

N t

Near-Term DOE Actions of Interest February 1986 - DOE to submit Fee Adequacy Report to Congress.

February 1986 - DOE to submit Annual Report to Congres's (Section 304).

March 1986 - DOE to issue Final Project Decision Schedule (PDS) (Section 114(d)).

April 1986 - DOE to issue final five Environmental Assessments for first repository.

April 1986 - DOE to nominate and recommend candidate sites for site characteri-zation.

I April 1986 - DOE to issue Transportation Institutional Plan.

EPA Proposes Radon Rule for Mills Under Clean Air Act The EPA proposed standard for radon emissions from licensed uranium mills was signed by the Administrator on February 14, 1986.

A public hearing is planned for February 27 - 28, 1986, in Denver Colorado. A 30-day comment period will follow the hearing.

NRC has received the proposed rule package for review.

Union 76 Molycorp, Washington, Pennsylvania A meeting was held on February 19, 1986, by representatives of NMSS and Region I with representatives of Molycorp, Inc. and their consultant Applied Health Physics, Inc. to discuss the renewal of Source Material License SMB-1393.

The Washington, Pennsylvania site was formerly used in aluminothermic metals pro-duction from ores containing source material.

The licensee is now authorized only to store material at the site, and is in the process of preparing plans for decontamination of the facility.

DOE Monitored Retrievable Storage (MRS)

,. s The Department of Justice has appealed to the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals the decision and injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee regarding the DOE MRS proposal.

Based on a legal suit by the State of Tennessee, the District Court enjoined DOE from submitting the MRS proposal to Congress as the proposal relates to siting studies and the recommended sites for the MRS in Tennessee.

The appeal requests a summary reversal of the injunction or a stay pending the appeal of the decision.

Early consideration by the Court of Appeals was requested.

1 ENCLOSURE C FEB 211986 t

1 NFS-Erwin l

Strike by OCAW members continues. There has been no progress made during the past couple of weeks in resolving differences between the Union and NFS.

NFS l

continues to conduct limited operations of the HEU production, scrap recovery, and R&D facilities.

l i

A,

..J ~;.

r\\1 I

t.

i (l

t j

-('

, (_f P

/

enctosuae c g 31, t

Office of Inspection and Enforcement Items of Interest Week Ending February 21, 1986 1.

The following Significant Enforcement Actions were taken during the past week:

None.

2.

The following IE Preliminary Notifications were issued during the past week:

1 a.

PNS-I-86-03, Defense Nuclear Agency, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (Bethesda, MD), Bomb Threat.

b.

PNO-I-86-14, Vermont Yankee Nuclear (Vermont Yankee), Inoperable SLC System Due to Miswiring, c.

PNO-I-86-15, Philadelphia Electric Company (Peach Bottom Unit 3),

j Radioactive Spill.

d.

PNO-I-86-16, Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory (Pittsburgh, PA), Guilty Pleas and Sentences for Violations of Atomic Energy Act.

7

)

e.

PNO-I-86-17, McFarland-Johnson Engineers, Inc. (New Haven, CT), Theft of a Moisture / Density Guage.

f.

PNO-I-86-18 RAI Research Corporation (Hauppage, NY), Stolen Source, g.

PN0-II-86-14, Duke Power Company (0conee Units 1, 2 & 3), Mild Earthquake Felt at Site.

h.

PN0-II-86-15, Mississippi Power & Light Company (Grand Gulf Unit 1),

l.

Shutdown to Replace Recirculation Pump Seals.

1.

PNO-II-86-16, Tennessee Valley Authority (Knoxville, TN), Resignation of TVA Director Richard M. Freeman.

J.

PNO-III-86-13, Commonwealth Edison Company (Zion Units 1 and 2),

Diesel. Generators Inoperable in Tests.

k.

PNO-III-86-14, Commonwealth Edison Company (Byron Unit 1), Diesel Generator Repair.

1.

PNO-III-86-15, Commonwealth Edison Company (LaSalle Unit 1), Injured Worker.

m.

PN0-V-86-06, Arizona Nuclear Power Project (Palo Verde Unit 1),

Commercial Operation Declared.

n.

PN0-V-86-07, Monsanto Company (Dayton, OH), State of Washington Suspension of Mensanto Company Permot for Radioactive Waste Burial.

FEB 211986 ENCLOSURE D

.o.

  1. 'g 3.

The following IE Information Notices and IE Bulletins were issued during 1

the past week:

l None.

4.

Other Items a.

Generic Issues Part 21 notification of a problem with Colt Industries-Fairbanks-Morse PC-2 Series Emergency Diesel Generators was received by letter dated February 4, 1986; 14 units were notified with corrective action procedure, b.

Meetings--Conferences of Note MembersoftheSafegYa'ds&MaterialsProgramsBranch,Divisionof r

Inspection, the Engineering & Generic Communications Branch, and the Incident Response Branch, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response, made presentations at and participated in the Reactor Health Physics Counterpart Meeting in Region I this week.

c.

Emeroency Planning FEMA conducted a graded exercise at the Shoreham power plant on

^

February 13, 1986.

In addition to the normal NRC region task of observing the licensee onsite portion of the Shoreham exercise, the NRC provided support to FEMA in conducting the exercise. The additional support was for 11 simulators who represented state and local government positions and eight offsite controllers. The logs of these individuals were provided to FEMA shortly after the conclusion of the exercise to be utilized in the development of the FEMA evaluation report which is expected to be available in about 6 weeks.

d.

Senior Management Meetings Deputy Division Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response attended a management site visit at Cawtaba February 20-21, 1986.

e.

Civil Penalties Paid (1) 0n February 18, 1986, payment in the amount of $500 was received from Chan & Associates (Caspar, Wi) for enforcement action (EA 85-135) relating to violitions involving failure to make surveys, properly label packages, promptly evaluate an over-exposure, and use only personnel with required training.

N OMED FEB 211986

-(

es

. (2) On February 19, 1986, payment in the amount of $100,000 was received from Florida Power & Light Company (Turkey Point) for i

enforcement action (EA 85-80) relating to a violation involving the failure to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.59 in the modification of the spent fuel pit and changes in operating practice at the facility.

f.

Incident Response The Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response, the Incident Response Branch Chief, and staff member met with management representatives from NRC Region III, Commonwealth Edison Company, FEMA, and the States of Illinois and Wisconsin on February 24, 1986, to discuss the next Federal Field Exercise.

g.

Vendor Program A member of the Vendor Program Branch, Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, and Technical Training Programs, attended a meeting at Region V with San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1 this week.

h.

Quality Assurance Members of the Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, and Technical 4

Training Programs and consultants conducted a design process inspec-tion at the TVA Office of Engineering, Knoxville, TN and at the Sequoyah site this week.

'Q'uality Assurance Branch Section Chief and two staff members visited Region III to discuss revisions to the QA inspection program for operation reactors.

i.

Enforcement Conference A member of the Enforcement Staff attended an enforcement conference in Region III on Brunswick (CP&L) this week.

j.

Technical Training Center The TTC management staff conducted regional training assessments in

{

Region III and Region V last week and will conduct assessments in Region IV next week.

ENCLOSURE D FEB 211986 i

b l

0FFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH Items of Interest Week Ending February 21, 1986 Severe Accident Sequence Analysis (SASA) Review Neeting The Severe Accident Sequence Analysis (SASA) review meeting was held February 12 and February 13, 1986. The work reported by ORNL, SNL and INEL SASA groups emphasized the studies being made in support of the close out of hydrogen control issues for large dry reactors and for the rebaselining effort of reactor plant risk. The meeting was well attended and included representatives from NRR, EPRI, TVA, ESERRC0 (Empire State Electric Energy Research Co), ENC (Netherlands),

and the participating laboratories. A non-SASA supported presentation was made by R. Deem and P. Bientarz representing the New York Pcwer Authority; NYPA has developed a well integrated set of severe accident codes based on NRC models and codes developed by SASA and other research efforts of SARP (Severe Accident Research Program). Additional industrial support to SASA is apparent in that ESEERC0 is now funding three fourths of the BWR severe accident model development work at RPI. Complete results are published periodically in NUREG-contractor reports.

l l

i l

I FEB 211986 ENCLOSURE E

9

. RES RULEMAKING ACTIVITIES Severe Accident Risk Assessment The RES staff and supporting contractors are currently engaged in the reevalua-tion of the risk of six reference LWRs. This reevaluation is currently being used to support NRR's review of IDCOR submittals.

In addition, it will support the staff report NUREG-1150, which is intended to provide guidance to decision-makers as to the appropriate role of information on core melt frequency, containment performaace, source terms, and risk in making severe accident decisions.

A meeting was held on February 13-14, 1986, to discuss the risk important uncertainties for the Peach Bottom analysis.

Experts in containment loading, structural response, and source terms for the BWR Mark I design provided input on the ranges and degrees of belief for a number of parameters believed to be important to this plant's risk uncertainty. SNL will compile and document the results and combine them in order to provide a measure of overall uncertainty in risk. The Sequoyah and Grand Gulf plants will be studied next; and a similar meeting will be held in approximately 1 month to receive expert input.

Work on the reference plant analyses is progressing reasonably well. A meeting to provide NRC management with an overview of the results to date for Surry, Peach Bottom, Sequoyah, and Grand Gulf is currently scheduled for March 6, 1986.

Risk Effectiveness of LWR Regulatory Requirements In 1985 Policy and Planning Guidance on improving regulation of the nuclear industry, the Commission directed the staff to review existing regulatory requirements to see if some cculd be eliminated without compromising safety.

In response to this guidance, RES is continuing a 1985 program to select existing rules for reexamination based on a comprehensive evaluation of their risk significance.

Rules that have marginal importance to safety or that have become obsolete by implementation of other approved staff practices will be recommended for elimination or modification.

A meeting is scheduled for February 25, 1986, to discuss draft detailed work plans for the four tasks to be evaluated in FY 1986. These tasks are:

(1) 4 combustible gas control, (2) post accident sampling system, (3) impregnated charcoal filters, and (4) turbine missiles.

PNL personnel will present a draft plan for each task and the meeting participants may offer comments and/or suggestions to improve the plans. The participants will include Program Advisory Group members, Research Review Group memoers, and knowledgeable NRC 1

experts for each topic.

ENCLOSURE E FEB 211985 s

l l

l' ITEMS OF INTEREST e

0FFICE OF INTERNATI0hAL PROGRAMS I

WEEK ENDING FEBRUARY.21, 1986 j

j Two Radiological Releases at Sellafield Reprocessing Facility IP has been advised of two unrelated events which occurred in February 1986 at the British Nuclear Fuels, Ltd. (BNFL) Sellafield facility where i

the reprocessing of magnox fuel is carried out. Neither event resulted 3

in significant exposure to plant personnel or significant releases to the environment, according to BNFL and the British safety authority, the l

}

Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII).

i j'

The first incident took place on February 5 when a leak occurred in a I

section of the facility where radioactive samples are taken from the t

reprocessing stream for chemical analysis. Compressed air, which is _

i routinely used to remotely control the sampling process equipment, was i

found to be blowing into a drip tray and dispersing the liquor in the form of a mist. BNFL personnel present at the time of the release were i

.aedically checked for plutonium contamination and were released. It was 1

estimated that about 50 micro-curies of alpha activity (about one fifth i

the daily dose of background radiation) was released through the plant j

chimney before the ventilation system shut down.

l The second incident occurred on February 18 when a break was discovered I

in a drainpipe from the magnox storage and decanting plant at i

Sellafield. Low-activity pond water was discharged into a trench, i

resulting in an increase in radioactivity in the imediate vicinity.

j The area was cordoned off and initial monitoring showed little potential i

j hazard to the workforce in the vicinity.. Initial assessments indicated j

j that exposure of personnel was not serious.

j The NII's investigation of these two incidents is continuing.

l'

+

i l

Meeting to Discuss the Future of the Nuclear Safety Training Academy l

On Thursday representatives from the State Department DOE, and NRC met with industry representatives at the State Department to discuss the t

j future of the Nuclear Safety Training Academy (NSTA). The first session of the Training Academy was held at Stanford University in August 1985 I

l and NRC sent three staff members to participate in the program.

If i

sufficient funding and support for the next course can be established,

]

the next session of NSTA is scheduled for 1987.

1 r

i l

t i

i i

i i

FEB 21 le86 ENCLOSURE G i

1 l

4 t

. ~ ~ _ _..

t j

International Organization Vacancy Notices I

The following international nuclear agency vacancy notices have been i

posted on NRC bulletin boards:-

OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, France:

i A-4 Principal Administrator in the Office for Energy Research, Development and Technology Application, Combined Energy Staff International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria:

i f

P-3 (several positions)

Nuclear Safeguards Inspector, Division of Operations, Department of Safeguards P-4 (several positions) j Nuclear Safeguards Inspector, Division of Operations, Department j

of Safeguards P-4 Operational Safety Officer, Safety of Nuclear Installations 1

Section, Division of Nuclear Safety, Department of Nuclear d

Energy and Safety 4

P-3 Life Scientist, INIS Section Division of Scientific and

)

Technical Information, Department of Nuclear Energy and Safety 5

P-4 Containment and Surveillance Specialist, Section for Development of Instruments, Methods and Techniques, Division of Development and Technical Support, Department of Safeguards i

l P-2 Acquisitions Librarian, VIC Library, Division of Scientific and j

Technical Infomation, Department of Nuclear Energy and Safety 1

P-4 Head, Technical Ser' ices Unit, VIC Library, Division of I

Scientific and Technical Infomation, Department of Nuclear j

Energy and Safety i

P-4 Head, Reader Services Unit, VIC Library, Division of Scientific and Technical Information, Department of Nuclear Energy and i

Safety P-5 Section Head Nuclear Medicine Physician, Medical Applications Section, Division of Life Sciences Department of Research and l

Isotopes ENCLOSURE G FEB 211986

3 Foreign Visitors On Wednesday Dr. Michael Cullingford of the Nuclear Safety Division of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) met with representatives of the RES Risk Analysis and Operations Branch, as well as EDO and IP staff members, to discuss NRC's cooperation with IAEA in their preparation of a probabilistic safety assessment (case study) document.

Foreign Trip Reports 1

George Napuda, IE, Region I IAEA Expert October 6-26, 1985; Visited Mexico:

As an IAEA expert, Mr. Napuda undertook a three-week mission to advise l-and assist a Mexican National Nuclear Safety and Safeguards Comission member in the analysis of corrective actions by the Comision Federal de 4

Electricidad that became necessary because of adverse findings d

l identified during the 1984 Construction Assessment Team inspection that was conducted as part of this expert's previous mission. Onsite at Laguna Verde, Mr. Napuda interfaced daily with team members and group leaders to advise, assist, and consult as the need arose.

O. D. T. Lynch, Jr., SSPD/DPWRL-B, NRR January 26-February 2,__1986; Visited Egypt:

As an instructor and NRC expert, Mr. Lynch participated in an environmental workshop, conducted for the Egyptian goverr, ment, held in Cairo. He delivered 14 lectures and participated in a number of discussion and work sessions.

i l

4 ENCLOSURE G FEB 211986

0FFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS ITEMS OF INTEREST WEEK ENDING FEBRUARY 21, 1986 Meeting with Massachusetts Officials D. A. Nussbaumer, OSP; J. Mapes ELD and J. McGrath, Region I, met with State Senator Carol Amick and other Hassachusetts officials in Boston on February 19, 1986 regarding the State's interest in pursuing Agreement State status. Senator Amick is the Senate Chairman of the Special Legislative Commission on LLU. The State intends to pursue, as a minimum, a limited agreement for regulating LLU disposal, with a full agreement a possibility. The discussion centered on the statutory authority the State would need for this purpose.

State Program Reviews The radiation control programs of California and New York City Health Department will be reviewed beginning the week of March 31 1986.

Low-Level Waste Compacts 1.

Staff members of OSP and the Division of Waste Management. NMSS, met with State representatives in Washington on Wednesday, February '19..The State representatives expressed a nebb far definitiveness in determining the completeness of an application for a-LLW disposal facility license submitted either to NRC or an Agreement State.

They were also irlterested in knowing how HRC determinations of4 specific waste streams being below regulatory concern also applied in Agreement States!

2.

A current chart showing the status of the LLW Compacts is attached. The most significant change is the withdrawal of Delaware from the Northeast and joining the Appalachian.

Y 49 6

i

/

b e

g

1 INTERSTATE LOW-LEVEL RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE C0hPACTS IN FORCE AS OF FEBRUARY 20, 1986 j

s m

Northwest Rocky Mountain Central Midwest Central-Midwest Southeast Northeast Alaska Colorado Arkansas Indiana Illinois Alabama Connecticut l

Hawaii Nevada Kansas Iowa Kentucky Florida Maryland i

Idaho New Mexico Louisiana Michigan Georgia New Jersey Montana North Dakota (1)

Nebraska Minnesota Mississippi Washington,DC(2)

Oregon Wyoming Oklahoma Missouri North Carolina l

Utah Ohio South Carolina Washington Wisconsin Tennessee i

Virginia I

COMPACTS YET TO BE SUBMITTED Unaffiliated States TO CONGRESS FOR CONSENT Maine Massachusetts Appalachian Western New Hampshire j

NewYork(5) i Delaware (3)

Rhode Island Pennsylvania Arizona South Dakota West Virginia California (4)

Texas (5)

J Puerto Rico l

Vemont i

l Notes:

i (1) MD final eligibility not until July 1, 1987.

4 (2) Washington, DC has petitioned to join the compact.

4 (3) DE has withdrawn from the Northeast compact and enacted legislation into the Appalachian compact. MD is also eligible.

(4) California must enact legislation to become a member of the compact.

(5) New York and Texas are each planning sites of their own.

mM n

g Prepared by Office of State Programs, NRC (301) 492-9880 A

=c

l s

0FFICE OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT s

Item Of Interest Wedk Ending February 21, 1986 NRC Five-Year Plan The first draft of the NRC Five-Year Plan was provided to the Commission on February 14, 1986. The memorandum transmitting the draft Plan expressed the need for NRC top management to set strategic goals 'for the agency that can be used as the basis for converting this first draft, which is a budget projection, into a document that is a road map for how the agency should change over the next five years.

1

(

ENCLOSURE I TEB 211986 5

I l

REGION III STATUS REPORT DAVIS-BESSE LOSS OF FEEDWATER EVENT FEBRUARY 21, 1986 Plant Status The plant remains in cold shutdown.

Restart Activities l

A NRR maintenance survey inspection team will be on site March 24-28 to l

follow up on petticus findings and to evaluate the licensee's actions l

concerning management practices as they relate to the maintenance area.

M0 VATS testing, environmental qualification work and other maintenance

++

a:tivities continue on the 167 safety-related motor-operated valves onsite.

The licensee has completed all planned work on sixty six valves and returned them to service. The licensee is repairing and testing valve motor operators continuously with three overlapping ten-hour shifts.

The NRC test review team continues to provide weekly coverage of licensee

++

testing activities.

Repairs and testing of the Incore Monitoring system is l

continuing. Testing of Emergency Diesel Generator 1-1 was completed sucessfully last week. No major system testing was completed this week.

Further system testing awaits completion of equipment modifications.

Other Activities Inspections of safety system piping supports in the auxiliary building are continuing. Evaluation of the nonconformances (NCR) found on supports in containment is in progress.

Of the support NCRs requiring disposition prior to restart, twenty-two remain to be dispositioned.

The licensee's repair, replacement and engineering evaluation of items requiring environmental qualification (EQ) is continuing.

Inspectors from Region III and headquarters will be assisted by contract personnel in performing an EQ audit from February 24 through February 28.

The independent review team was on site this week to tour the plant and to

++

question licensee and NRC staff members about the Auxiliary Feedwater System and activities that may have led to the June 9,1985 event.

FEB 211986 ENCLOSURE L I

ITEMS ADDRESSED BY THE C0fEISSION - WEEK ENDING FEBRUARY 21, 1986 A.

STAFF REQUIREMENTS - BRIEFING ON STAFF ACTIVITIES REGARDING TVA, 2:00 P.M.,

bN N

Pb8 T

C D date The Commission met with staff to be briefed on the " Status of Staff Actions Regarding TVA" (SECY-86-1A).

Chairman Palladino requested Commissioners to examine the staff briefing slide labelled " Impact of TVA Effort on Staff" and provide any comments they have on it to the Chairman who will forward them to the staff.

(OCM)

Commissioner.Zech noted that, after the staff has completed its current effort on the TVA nuclear program, it would be useful

~

to form an NRC working group to focus on the lessons learned j

,from this effort.

B.

STAFF REQUIREMENTS - BRIEFING BY AIF ON TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS IMPROVEMENTS, 2:00 P.M., TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1986, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, D.C.

l OFFICE (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) Memo SECY to V. Stello dated 2/21/86 l

The Commission met with representatives of the Atomic' Industrial l

Forum (AIF) to discuss NRC efforts for improving technical specifications.

The following persons participated in this discussion:

- Hal Tucker, Vice President Duke Power Company

- Alan Passwater, Superintendent for Licensing Union Electric Company and Chairman, AIF Subcommittee on Technical Specifications The Commission requested that AIF provide an estimate of the percentage of surveillance tests that involve instruments and those that require human surveillance for the approximately 133 LCO's at Wolf Creek.

(NRR/AIF)

(SECY Suspense:

3/14/86)

Subject to receiving final comments and recommendations from the staff, Commissioner Zech supported implementation of the short term recommendations made by AIF and the TSIP report (provide more complete and meaningful bases, correct problems with tech spec clarity, and examine operability definition for improvements).

Commissioner Zech also requested the staff to address the question of whether or not a single document of supplemental tech specs was needed.

ENCLOSURE O FEB 211986

B.

CONTINUED Chairman Palladino requested staff to examine the question of how utilities could be encouraged through a policy statement to change over to standard or custom tech specs.

Chairman Palladino also urged the staff to comment on the Japanese approach of performing surveillance tests during outages as opposed to testing during power operation.

(NRR)

(SECY Suspense:

3/14/86)

Chairman Palladino requested the Office of the Secretary to poll Commissioners on the subject of the staff proceeding with a policy statement.

(SECY)

(Subsequently, the Office of the Secretary obtained the approval of a majority of the Commission for the staff to proceed with preparation of a policy statement for Commission consideration.

Answers to the questions raised during the AIF meeting as well as during the previous staff meeting should be provided in the Commission Information Paper which forwards the policy i

statement.)

commissioner Asselstine indicated that he would provide additional questions in writing to the staff.

l l

(Subsequently, in a memorandum dated February 19 Commissioner Asselstine requested staff to respond to questions regarding staff efforts to improve technical specifications.)

i l

FEB 211986 ENCLOSURE O

?

w NRR MEETING NOTICES *

]

FEBRUARY 14, 1986 8

DOCKET APPLICANT /

DATE/ TIME NUMBER LOCATION PURPOSE ATTENDEES NRR CONTACT 2/26/86 50-424 P-118 Meeting on Vogtle Safety Parameter Georgia Power Co.

M. Miller 8:30 a.m.

50-425 Phillips Bldg.

Display System (SPDS) and detailed

& Southern Co.

control room design review (DCRDR).

Services 2/26/86 50-219 Oyster Creek To tour the station site.

GPUN J. Donohew 8:30 a.m.

Plant Site Forked River, New Jersey 2/27/86 Quatel Office Meeting with Industry Group for the FPL 9:00 a.m.

Suite 208 Development of a Policy on l

7910 Woodmont Ave. Integrated Schedules at Nuclear Bethesda, Md.

Power Plants 2/27/86 50-029 CYGNA Corp. Offes. Meeting to discuss bases for Yankee Atomic 8:00 a.m.

101 California St. licensee's SEP Seismic Evaluation, Electric Company J. Clifford l

San Francisco, CA and to review existing data and l

calculations.

1 2/27/86 50-443 PSNH - NHYD, Meeting to discuss the proposed PSNH-NHY V. Nersus Seabrook Project.

rewrite of Standard Technical Office, 7910 Specifications for Sections 3/4.2.2, Woodmont Avenue, 3/4.2.3, 3/4.2.4 and 3/4.2.5 Suite 1309, Bethesda, Md.

Q Copies of summaries of these meetings will be made publicly available and placed in the respective docket file (s) in the NRC and local public document rooms m

E E

A o

?A-NMSS MEETING NOTICES

[$

FOR WEEK ENDING: 2/21/86 Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety Page 1 g3 co" DOCKET ATTENDEES /

DATE/ TIME NUMBER LOCATION PURPOSE APPLICANT NRC CONTACT 2/24/86 Project Willste Meeting with GNSI.

Evaluation of Reps of NRC, GNSI, Roberts 9:00-4:00 M-37 8th floor CASTOR V Basket Cracks.

& VEPC0 conf room 3/25/86 Willste Discuss Drop Test for Castor MTR Reps of NRC & GNSI Chappell 9:00-12:00 Cask.

3/4-14/86 Arlington, Conduct the National Program Reviews D. Chapell (FC)

Chape11/Cobb TX; Walnut of Regions IV, V, III and II's L. Cobb (IE)

Creek, CA; decentralized material licensing Glen Ellyn, and inspection activities.

IL; Atlanta, GA 3/7/86 East West Japanese visit to discuss cast Reps of NRC Senseney, IP Towers iron casks.

Dr. Ohnuma (Visitor) 3/11/86 Willste Japanese visit to discuss Reps of FC, WM & RES -

Senseney, IP exemption rules for disposal of S. Kanaza'fa, T. 0hata small quantities of waste.

S. Kato 4 I, Kurihara (Visitors) 3/11/86 Livermore, Participation in DOE Transportation C. MacDonald (FC)

MacDonald 9:30-12:30 CA Packaging Workshop.

Reps of DOE & contractors (DATE CORRECTION) e 5

-5 NMSS MEETING NOTICES M

FOR WEEK ENDING: 2/21/86

[

Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety Page 2 18 DOCKET ATTENDEES /

DATE/ TIME NUMBER LOCATION PURPOSE APPLICANT NRC CONTACT l

3/15-28/86

Vienna, Consultants meeting for com-C. MacDonald (FC)

MacDonald l

Austria pliance assurance guide and SAGSTRAM meeting.

3/19-20/86 King of Conduct the National Program D. Chape11 (FC)

Chapell/Cobb Prussia.

Review of Region I's decen-L. Cobb (IE)

PA tralized material licensing and inspection activities.

Division of Waste flanagement None Division of Safeguards None E

P o

C A

o

I 5

w to RES MEETING NOTICES February 21, 1986 r

Q DOCKET ATTENDEES /

m DATE/ TIME NUMBER LOCATION PURPOSE APPLICANT NRC CONTACT 2/27/86 H Street ACRS review of GDC-4 Broad J. Richardson J. O'Brien 8:30 AM Scope Rulemaking J.0'Brien x37854 R.Bosnak K.Wichman 2/27/86 New York,NY ANSI Planning Committee Meeting ANSI-NSB G.Ar. otto PlanCo Members x37995 2/24/86 MNBB Review peer review comments on L. Abramson L.Abramson 9:00 AM Chapters 13-17 of PNL Handbook S.Frattal i x37628 D.Lurie J.Tel ford 2/24/86 New York,NY Presentation to Subgroup on Fatigue -

M.Vagins M.VaginsSection III, Effect of Environment on S-N Curves 2/24/86 New York,NY Subgroup on Castings Forging and E.Woolridge E.Woolridge Bolting Subgroup on Steel Plates E. Wool ridge E.Woolridge Subccmmittee on Material Specifications E. Wool ri' ge E.Woolridge d

k5 5

m "U

i cc ec DOCKET ATTENDEES /

DATE/ TIME NUMBER LOCATION PURPOSE APPLICANT NRC CONTACT 2/26/86 New York,NY Subgroup Materials-Section III-A.Taboada A.Ta boada ASME-BPVC 2/26-27/86 ORNL HSST Program Review and Work M.Vagins M.Vagins Sessions l

2/27/86 Philadelphia,PA Meeting with PNL to discuss acoustic Hutton (ANL)

J.Muscara emission monitoring of Peach Bottom 3 pipe with IGSCC l

l C

P c.

CM

I February'21, 1986

[h to RII MEETING NOTICE R

DOCKET ATTENDEES /

DATE/ TIME NtMBER LOCATION PURPOSE APPLICANT NRC CONTACT 2/25/86 RII Office Vogtle Management Meeting Licensee and Selected Walker 1:00 pm RII Staff Members 2/27/86 Raleigh, NC Presentation of Operator CP&L Management and Grace-8:30 pm Licensing Certificates at Operators and Regional Harris Nuclear Facility Administrator and -

Selected RII Staff Members

'i 2/28/86 RII Office Enforcement Conference Licensee and Selected Walker 9:30 am McGuire Facility 1:00 pm RII Office Enforcement Conference Same as above Walker V. C. Summer Nuclear Plant P

o

--