ML20141F904

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Util Application for Authorization to Construct Cooper Nuclear Station.Acrs Meeting Held on 680307-09 to Review Application.Proposed Facility Can Be Constructed If Consideration Given to Noted Items
ML20141F904
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Cooper
Issue date: 03/12/1968
From: Zabel C
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
To: Seaborg G
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML17342B389 List:
References
FOIA-85-665 NUDOCS 8602260115
Download: ML20141F904 (2)


Text

),;

/.,-.

.Q t

s' 1

9 f

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 20545 MAR 1,21969 f

Honorable Glenn T. Seaborg t'hairman U. S. Atomic Energy Comission Washington, D. C.

20545

{

Subject:

REPORT ON COOPER NUCLEAR STATION t

[-

Dear Dr. Seaborg:

f f

At its ninety-fifth meeting, on March 7-9, 1968, the Advisory Comittee I

on Reactor Safeguards completed its. review of the application by the Consumers Public Power District of Nebraska for authorization to' con-struct its Cooper Nuclear Station. The project was previously considered at ACRS Subcomittee meetings held on October 10,*1967 at the plant site, e

and on February 29, 1968 in Washington, D. C.

During its ' review, the Comittee had the benefit of discussions with representatives of Consumers Public Power District, General Electric Company, Burns and Roe Inc., and j

the AEC Regulatory Staff. The Comittee also studied the documents

' listed.

The Cooper. Nuclear Station will be located about 60 miles south of Omaha, Nebraska,.on the west bank of the Missouri River. The plant is designed to produce 2381 MWt (801 HWe). The reactor in this plant is a high power j

Jensity boiling water unit, with design -features similar to those of the previously reviewed Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Station reactors.

The soils near the river at this. location consist primarily of saturated,.

poorly compacted sands which may be susceptible to the phenomenon of liquefaction if shaken by a sufficiently severe earthquake. The applicant will improve the foundation support of the plant by excavation to within a few feet of bsdrock, dewatering, replacing, and compacting the sand to a density sufficient to prevent liquefaction if such an earthquake should The reactor containment will be placed upon a concrete mat which, occur.

in turn, will rest.upon the. compacted sand.

l l

The Comittee recomends that the applicant give further consideration to l

the design df the emergency on-site power system to avoid the need for syn'chronization of the diesel-driven generators.

8602260115 851212" PDR FOIA L

FIRESTOO5-665 PDR

.... ~...,

s.c:;p r:,.. ;;._ y u *.,,, v 'l,. ;! N '.l':f*f ~

l

}

.* :seJLju i % hL x im

~.

- '_ a. i:

U u

.. A

{,

4

  • 1*-

a b

f P
1,

. Discussion of General Design Criterion Number 35 (10 CFR 50.34 proposed) has occurred in connection with this review. The. manner in which the' intent of this criterion will be met for the Cooper Nuclear Station should be re' solved between the applicant and the AEC Regulatory Staff.

The Committee, in its report to you of March 14, 1967 on the Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Station, called attention to a number of matters that warrant careful consideration with regard to

  • reactors of this type and power den-sity. These matters apply similarly to the Cooper Nuclear Station.

i.

(l[

The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards believes that the items men-l{

tioned above can be resolt<

during construction. The Committee believes that, if due' attention is given to the foregoing comments, the propo' sed

,7 facility can be constructed with reasonable assurance that it can be oper-l.

ated without undue risk to the health and safety of the public.

I e

Sincerely yours,

.46#

4 I

Carroll !. Zabel Chairman References li if 1.

Consumers Public Power District License Application for the Cooper Nuclear Station, dated July 26, 1967; Preliminary Safety Analysis f

Report, Volumes I, II, and III.

f-Amendment No. I to License Application, dated December'1, 1967.

2.

3.

Amendment No. 2 to License Application, dated January 25, 1968 l;

4.

Amendment No. 3 to License Application, dated February 10, 1968.

5.

Amendment No. 4 to License Application, dated February 10, 1968.

6.

Amendment No. 5 to License Application, dated February 20, 1968.

7.

Amendment No. 6 to License Application, dated March 2, 1968.

t 1

a L ll L

'2'

,t>

L J ',. b. :f.. _

'