ML20141D068
| ML20141D068 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry, Sequoyah, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 03/17/1986 |
| From: | Catlin J, Croes J, Stevens W TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML082340290 | List: |
| References | |
| SQN-85-001-02, SQN-85-1-2, NUDOCS 8604070388 | |
| Download: ML20141D068 (79) | |
Text
,_
. j_
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW STAFF NSRS INVESTICATIGN REPORT NO. SQN-85-001-02 EMPLOYEE CONCERE:
SQN-85-001-02
SUBJECT:
FIBERCLASS INSULATION INSIDE CONTAINMENT DATES OF INVESTIGATION:
FEBRUARY 12-20, 1986
)
I7 INVESTICATOR:
er
.- x J. (L. CRGES BATE /
~
, REVIEWED BY:
A 7 4
,J. C. CATLIN
/DATE APPROVED BY:
W. D. STEVENS
-- DATE e
- e e
8604070308 860328 PDR ADOCK 05000259 P
s.
~
.)
I.
BACKGROUND A Nuclear Safety Review Staff (NSRS) investigation was conducted to determine the validity of an expressed employee concern received by the NSRS. The concern of record, identified as SQN-85-001-02, stated:
There is fiberglass insulation at the bottom of each steam line next to the steam generator. CI has been
~
told that there should be no insulation other than mirror inside containment. December 1985 timeframe.
II.
SCOPE A.
The scope of this investigation, as defined by the employee concern, is that fiberglass insulation was being used on steam lines inside containment.
B.
NSRS and Plant Metallurgical Engineering personnel inspected the
. steam lines on the bottom of the steam generators of unit 1.
III.
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS A.
Requirements and Commitments 1.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion IV, " Nonconforming Materials Parts, or Components" 2.
TVA Topical-Report TVA-TR75-1A, Revision 8, paragraph 17.2.15
" Nonconforming Materials, Parts, or Components" 3.
TVA Topical Report TVA-TR75-1A, Revision 8. Table 17D-3, which j
commits TVA to use U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.33 (Revision 2),
~
dated February 1978, " Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Operations)," which endorses use of ANSI N18.7-1976 4.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide 1.36, dated February 23, 1973, " Nonmetallic Thermal Insulation for Austenitic Stainless S. teel" B.
Findings
~
1.
Regulatory Guide 1.36 prohibits all use of materials containing chlorides coming in contact with austenitic steel pipe. Mirror insulation contains no chlorides.
2.
When the NSRS and Plant Metallurgical Engineering personnel inspected the steam lines inside containment unit 1, only metallic mirror insulation was noted.
l 1
2
.j 3.
Discussions with plant personnel revealed that an extensive qualification program is underway to ensure that all nonmetallic thermal insulation meets U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Guide 1.36, dated February 23, 1973, " Nonmetallic.Theruml Insulation for Austenitic Stainless steel." This is being accomplished with sample testing of nonmetallic insulation in use inside containment. A full walkdown of all piping systems within containment in units 1 and 2 is scheduled to ensure that all nonmetallic thermal insulation installed in containment meets Regulatory Guide 1.36.
4.
NSRS has done a full investigation on nonmetallic thermal insulation on austenitic stainless steel systems (see NSRS Investigation Report No. I-85-106-SQN) which covers the use of fiberglass insulation and other nonmetallic types of insulation on stainless steel piping such as the pipes in question.
IV.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A.
Conclusions 1.
The employee concern that fiberglass insulation is at the bottom of each steam line next to the steam generator was not subatantiated. Mirror insulation was noted at this location.
2.
The concern that no insulation other than mirror insulation should be inside containment is covered in NSRS Investigation Report No. I-85-106-SQU.
Four recommendations on this report are being implemented by Sequoyah Nuclear Plant.
l B.
Recommendations l
None O
\\
l 1
1 2
l
_..m,
i-
,e ENCLOSURE 3.
RESPONSES TO INVESTIGATION REPORTS SUMITTED BY LINE ORGANIZATIONS AND i
NOT YET REVIEWED FOR ACCEPTABILITY RESPONSES TO CONCERN NUMBERS:
IN-8(o-l(p9 - CD l e
4 S
e h
=
i
~
m
TV A 94 (05 945) (OP-wp 5 55L 1s D
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
' Memorandum TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY To:
W. T. Cottle, Site Director, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant FROM:
K. W. Whitt Director of Nuclear Safety Review Staff, E3AS C-K DATE:
SUBJECT:
CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE EVALUATION REPORT NO. :
I-85-532-WBN SUBJECT FOREICN OBJECTS IN CONCRETE a A h
CONCERN NO.:
IN-86-259-X13 m,
esuctt Am P Ah?
Sit YMCR 5 ^*N*
(I) ACCEPT
(
-)
REJECT
,4g i
2 5 5 3 4 d!
-r ~. :.
s n.
--E;Z 8
K. W. Whitt W_
4
.~.
PRW:JIH N
~E cc (Attachment):
R. P. Denise LP6N40A-C
. y;l:' "+
D. R. Nichols, E10A14C-K
~-
QTC/ERT, CONST-WBN E. K. Sliger, LP6N48A-C Principally prepared by P. R. Washer.
0548U Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
,fys s3 m m u UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
' Memorandum TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY K. W. Whitt., Director of Nuclear Safety Review Staff, E3A8 C-K To FROM W. T. Cottle, Site Director, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant ONP FEB 11 BBS DATE
SUBJECT:
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT - RESPONSE TO EMPLOYEE CONCERN INVESTIGATION REPORT I-85-532-WBN (EMPLOYEE CONCERN IN-86-259-X13)
Transmitted herein is Construction's response to recocnendation I-85-532-VBN-01 contained in Nuclear Safety Review Staff (NSRS) employee concern investigation report I-85-532-VBN.
If you have any questions, please contact W. L. Byrd at 3774, Vatts Bar Nuclear Plant ONP.
bhl' b W. T( Cottle r--
VLB:RDA:NC Attachment
[g 1
'g This memorandum was principally prepared by R. D. Anderson.
i, ::
j..,
-. b t h L..
L'.__ M_1.d i<:
... -.. u 's.-.. t
.-i ;% L
, - j-,y p_
.~~~l-,,.,
L;.-
._:9_
L _
4.-
O.,g[ '
y l
l l
f I
L
'....k Buy U.S. Savines Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savines Plan l
. - - - - - - -. ~
e,,,
Employee Concern IIN-86-259-X13 Concern: CI stated that there are numerous foreign objects embedded in the concrete through out the plant.
i.e. nails, wire lights, bolts, nuts. No specific location was provided. Construction concern. C1 has no additional information.
NSRS Report #I-85-532-WBN NSRS's
Conclusions:
The concern was substantiated as embedment of foreign objects in concrete pours has occurred. However, the effecto,have been mitigated by the use of the NCR process and concrete repair procedures. It was evident that controls such as those in G-2 were in place to inspect cleanness prior to concrete placement. In addition, inspection personnel appeared to' be aware of cleanliness requirements; and concrete placement was to take place only in the presence of authorized inspectors. It was noted by NSRS that WBN-QCP-2.02 did not directly require an inspection for cleanness prior to concrete placement. However, this did not appear to be the cause of foreign material embedment. This problem appeared to be caused by the difficulty in actually performing the inspection.
NSRS's Recocz:endations:
I-85-532-WBN WBN-QCP-2.02 Requirements
~
'~
The requirement to inspect and document cleanness prior, to concrete place-ment should be'directly incorporated into WBN-QCP-2.02.
Resoonse OC agrees with NSRS's conclusions and rec - Ations and has submitted a revision request. RR437, to P&T for incorporation into the next revision to QCP-2.02.~ Quality Manager has given an ECD of February 28, 1986 for encorporation.
Principally prepared by Bill Bartlett extension 3288 t
l
.e l
l l
1 l
l
~
TV A C4 [OS-94 5) (OP-WP-5 85)
UNITRD ST[TES COVERN3 TENT Memorandum TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY TO:
W. T. Cottle, Site Director, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant FROM:
K. W. Whitt, Director of Nuclear Safety Review Staff E3A8 C K i
,9() /
FEB 28 1986 DATE:
- u r
mnera pe,u,t
SUBJECT:
CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE EVALUATION
~
.ld V 4 '00 REPORT NO. :
I-85-472-NPS I
I h h h t
SUBJECT DRAWING CONTROL MASTER INDEX SYSTaris.,
v;i CONCERN NO.:
IN-86-IO8-002 and XX-85-062-002 W ~
t i
$l..+.
~.m.
c.~w. '"
(
) ACCEPT (X) REJECT F'"' '""'
The Sequoyah response is rejected. Conflicting and iAmviTl nen H-drawing control requirements have been identified in referencel T,"
~~
2, and 19 of the NSRS report.
In addition, statements contained in the response support the indication that distribution of controlled copies of drawings and revision controls at Sequoyah are not being accomplished in accordance with applicable upper-tier QA program requirements. Also, available infom.ation indicates that Sequoyah has full capability for drawing status and distribution through utilization of the DMS.
K. W. Whitt WRS:GDM cc (Attachment):
R. P. Denise, LP6N40A-C D. R. Nichols, E10A14C-K,
QTC/ERT, CONST-WBN j
E. K. Sliger, LP6N48A Principally prepared by W. R. Simonds.
9 Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
d,*a re-w.i UWITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY To
- K. W. White, Director of Nuclear Safety Review Staff, E3A8 C-K FROM
- H. L. Abercrombie, Site Director, NUC PR, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant January,16} 1986 DATE e
SUBJECT:
NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW STAFF (NSRS) INVESTIGATION REPORT No. I-85-472-NPS,
" DRAWING CONTROL MASTER INDEX SYSTEM"
's
Reference:
Your memorandum to me dated Dece=ber 27, 1985, " Nuclear Safety Review Staff Investigation Report Transmittal" Attached is our response to NSRS Report No. I-85-472-NPS.
t
- /
l
///k/?Y /(~
'H. L.'A5ercrombie PRW:GBK:RCB:DR Attachment cc (Attachment):
E=ployee Concern Files, RES, Sequoyah 1/22/86--JTH cc (Attachment):
j W. R. Simonds, SQN--For evaluation.
/
~
~-
di?.'l
'].
I
~
c 0N)}
V I
+
a
~..
r h
i Rus, il e cam *.ar Ra de Do nnia,1., n,, e t,o pa,.enti L,,,;,,ar plaa
. -, m,.:oa..s... c n -.......,...... '-
r
-.---.--r=-
r-
=
NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW STAFF REPORT No. I-85-472-NPS NSRS Report No. I-8 5-4 72-NPS A Nuclear Safety Review Staff (NSRS) investigation was conducted to determine the validity of two expressed employee concerns as received by Quality Technology Company (QTC)/ Employee Response Team (ERT). The concerns of record, as summarized on the Employee Concern 4ssignment Request Forns from QTC and identified as XX-85-062-002 and IN-86-108-002, stated:
Concern: The current TVA system of using a master card file of drawings (this system in place at Sequoyah) is inadequate and should not be implemented (if not already) at Watts Bar, Browns Ferry, and Bellefonte. This system allows for instant disarray, destruction, or loss of reference cards if a drawer is dropped or the system sabo-taged. The data from the cards should be input to the computer and available to all applicable offices within TVA.
Conclusions 1.
The employee concern is substantiated not on the specifics of the concern but its substance. The basis for this conclusion follows:
a.
The " current TVA system" for configuration control is intended to be the DMS not the master card index system as alleged.
However, upper-tier instructions do not preclude the use of the master card file and, therefore, though SQN DCC personnel are complying with the updating of D}$ for SQN CC drawings in accordance with upper-tier (reference 1 and 2) requirements, they are not meeting the literal intent of the requirements to use DMS exclusively, since SQN DCC personnel continue to maintain and utilize the caster index.
~
b.
The SQN master index system is not a reliable CC drawing control system since it is not controlled nor is it an approved QA program method.
c.
The master index is inadequate for TVA use because it is a localized system which does not provide accessibility to other TVA organizations having a need to obtain the proper as-constructed status of SQN equipment.
~ 2.
Accordingly, P&E (Nuclear) decided to replace all the systems such as the master index with the DMS as the single CC drawing management system for P&E (Nuclear). Browns Ferry, Watts Bar, and Bellefonte do not use a master index system for CC drawing control but do use DMS.
5 I
Ye k
- Odt4 %,48"g(P*St#Y 9 $
Yi -
$ 9' AI'* ' I
r
~
/
Recommendations 1.
I-85-472'NPS-01, Configuration Drawing Control Requirements The upper-tier requirements contained in references 1 and 2 do not preclude the continued use of master index systems for construction status and other information retrieval for CC drawings. NSRS recommends:
a.
That references 1 and 2 be revised to require DMS utilization exclusively by site DCC organizations for CC drawing information retrieval, and i
b.
that the master index be placed under the QA program as a backup system, if desired, or until total conversion to DMS occurs.
(P2) 2.
I-85-472-NPS-02, SQN Imolementation of DMS SQN DCC has not implemented the D>G as the single CC drawing manage-ment system. NSRS recommends that SQN revise reference 19 to require exclusive utilization of DMS for CC drawing information retrieval.
This action should establish the D>$ as the single CC drawing manage-ment system and discontinue DCC utilization of the master index.
(P2)
Sequovah Nuclear Plant (SQN) Response to I-85-472-NFS-01 The TVA Configuration Control Task Force is continuing their ef forts to develop progra=s for the use of the Drawing >bnagement System (DMS).
The areas still being developed include auditing of the system, methods to ensure data is correctly entered, number of terminals required, etc.
Until the task force has developed all their programs to ensure the D}G can be completely i=plemented and all other systems deleted, a revision to references 1 and 2, identified in the NSRS report, will not be requested.
The master card index in the SQN Drawing Control Unit (DCU) is used for information by site personnel and does not require being placed under a quality assurance program. Several constraints within the drawing distri-bution systen will prevent the issuing or using o*f out-ofadate drawings even if information contained on the cards in the master card index is incorrect or missing. Workplans contain a specified drawing revision level to be used, so the cards have no impact on the workplan. Also, if an individual needs a design drawing, he must know the revision level needed or he will be issued the latest revision in the DCU drawing tank.
When "As-Constructed" (AC) drawings are requested, the individual is issued the latest AC revision contained in the DCU drawing tanks even if the card index shows the wrong revision.
In addition, all the information is con-tained in the DMS, and if cards are lost, the information can be repro-duced. The master card index is used by site personnel as a quick reference and for information only, and the information contained on the cards will not result in incorrect drawings being issued or used. Also, the DFG computer printout is used by the DCU personnel to perform audits of the remote distribution points to ensure the latest drawing revisions are available for use..,,
,....,.-.%,-e
-..-......--.e..-..,
l' SQN Response to I-85-472-NPS-02 Reference 19 in the NSRS report, SQN Administrative Instruction (AI)-25,
" Receipt, Filing, and Distribution of Drawings," will not be. revised to require exclusive use of the DMS until the Configuration Control Task Force has all the programs in place to facilitate implementation of the DMS.
In addition, the SQN DCU has requested additional computer '
terminals to support increased use of the DMS. At the present time, only two computer terminals are available for use with the DMS in the DCU.
N e
e O
S l ** *
- P e
sr g,p P,gerA*, ".
d e e
, * %a t er #f- %#9r4* %9%saf e #
r
,*3' e e s4 *
- e-ese4 mmr w
(*,=
t 8
- h*
- #* b ** GMD $ #eN ^ - --
_ gear
-.. - < ww -
- ~-',
o--v~- - - - - - '-*
- /
TVA 60 (OS-9-65) (OP WP-5 85)
L'NITED STATES GOVERN 3 TENT Memorandum TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY TO:
W. C. Bibb, Site Director, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant FROM:
K. W. Whitt. Director of Nuclear Safety Review Staff, E3A8 C-K MAR 141986 DATE:
SUBJECT:
CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE EVALUATION REPORT NO. :
I-85-379-BFN SUBJECT INADEOUATE TRAINING OF CRAFTSMEN CONCERN NO.:
XX-85-016-001 (I) ACCEPT
(
) REJECT I-85-379-BFN-01: MAI-4 was revised as recommended.
I-85-379-BFN-02:
EMI-71 was not revised as recommended but was determined to be technically adequate.
I-85-379-BFN-03:
Training classes in the use of M&TE have been requested. Confirmed dates for the training are not known at this time.
K. W. Whitt FJS:GDM cc (Attachment):
R. P. Denise, LI6N40A-C
~
D. R. Nichols, E10A14C-K j
QTC/ERT, CONST-WBN E. K. Sliger, LP6N48A Principally prepared by F. J. Slagle.
i, i
0603U i
9 L
TW A G3 (@Q-W3 R42 860307 864 UNITED STATES GOVERN 3!ENT Memorandum TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY To
. K. W. Whitt, Director of Nuclear Safety Review Staff, E3A8 C-K fro 31 W. C. Bibb, Site Director, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant MAR 101986 DATE
SUBJECT:
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT (BFN) - NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW STAFF (NSRS) 2EroRr I-85-379-BFN - EMPLOYEE CONCERN REGARDING INADEQUATE TRAINING OF
/#
CRAFTSMEN IUR 12 '86 3
i The subject report requested a response to two priority 2 i !
- pnmendations. The responses to the recommendations are as follows:
m
,4 I-85-379-BFN-01, PAI-4 Revision s
t.9 L I
M i
The proposed revision to MAI-4 should be completed and issued by ES the BFN site. A copy of the issued procedure should be sent to NSRS for review.
55 2
Resoonse
_a d.AI-4hasbeenrevised. The latest revision was on December 2, l
N j985,andacopyofthisrevisionisattached.
m.c i
..r
'I-85-379-BFN-02, EMI-71 Revision
's,,.
c.
w.
NSRS recommends that EMI-71 be revised to include more specific instruction in the use of special equipment for megger, kelvin bridge, and high-pot testing.
Resoonse Electrical maintenance believes that procedure EMI-71 is technically adequate and serves its intended purpose.
No revision, therefore, is necessary at this time. It should be pointed out, i
I however, that the manufacturer's procedure for setup and a i
step-by-step use of the kelvin' bridge and high-pot equipment is enclosed or attached to each instrument container.
Electrical maintenance believes that a training class should be given to those j
electricians who ordinarily perform megger, kelvin bridge, and high-pot testing.
' 'd o.... r r e c -..:. n >. n.. r - r.. -
- s.. n -... o r o -
-. no--
[E 2
K. W. Whitt-BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT (BFN) - NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW STAFF (NSRS)
REPORT I-85-379-BFN - EMPLOYEE CONCERN REGARDING INADEQUATE TRAINING OF CRAITSMEN Training classes for measuring and test equipment have been requested.
Confirmed dates for these classes are not known at this time, however.
h W. C. Bibb RLL:ECM:WCB:JLA Attachment cc (Attachment):
RIMS, MR 4N 72A-C This was prepared principally by W. C. Burke.
EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST TO: Employee Concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50278 ERT has received the Employee concern identified
- below, and has assigned the indicated category and priority:
Priority: 1 Concern #IN-85-025-OO5 Category: 58 Confidentiality: ___ YES
___NO ( I SH)
Supervisor Notified: _X__YES ___ NO NUCLEAR SAFETY RELATED
__YES__
Concern PAPERWORK (MAINTENANCE REQUESTS) WHICH INDICATED THAT WORK WAS COMPLETE WERE SIGNED BY DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL DUE'TO SUPERVISION' S (NAME KNOWN)
DESIRE TO INCREASE PRODUCTION.
- HOWEVER, THE WORK REPRESENTED BY THESE MAINTENANCE REQUESTS WAS, IN FACT, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECTLY PERFORMED.
NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT CONCERN.
C/I HAS NO FURTHER INFORMATION.
...n
~
l l
MAUAGER, ERT DATE
.e T > ~,'.
ECP Task Group has assigned responsibility for i nvest i rpit ion of the l
f f.1 7above concern tos Ny :,..
~
- .'ERT ___
~
NSRS/ERT _____
NSRS ______
___ _b__[b OTHERS (SPECIFY) i
$$ ___ ____________3)'
16 ECP Task Group ATE I
l l
i
EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST TO: Employee Concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50278 ERT has received the Employee concern identified
- below, and has assigned the indicated category and priority:
Priority: 4 Concern #*XX-85-027-011 Category: 86 Confidentiality: ___ YES ___NO(I&H)
Supervisor Notified:
___YES ___ NO NUCLEAR SAFETY RELATED _NO___
Concern SEQUOYAH:
INAPPROPRIATE PERSONNEL CLASSIFICATIONS WERE MADE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A LAYOFF.
THESE CHANGES ULTIMATELY HAD AN ADVERSE EFFECT UPON THE C/I.
DETAILS KNOWN TO
- OTC, WITHHELD DUE TO CONFIDENTIALITY.
NO FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE RELEASED.
- w k4 w - +.-
5:7;e r;';c!-
M W:
2 7,y 4{' :, x 3
MANAGER, ERT ATE
, M:%yh:l.{t^'
T, xy.a.s' ECP ' Task Group has assigned responsibility for investigation of the WN Mrcc above concern tos E 3dN#E'.i; REERT ___
- 4,, a* Lim,
- .
v 4 s +..* m
'j$I;.lNSRS/ERT_____
'y - z;.
' *lNSRS ______
A..
.y 8-
.,e,e_
9 lj'
..(OTHERS (SPECIFY) h_[_h____________________
m_-
(
._[d2:
ECP Task Group ATE l
l t
T he '
AH 0 %.C
- m eue*
~~ p&,,' k L r&
l l
l i
EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST TO: Employee Concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50278 ERT has received the Employee concern identified
- below, and has assigned the indicated category and priority:
Priority: 1 Concern #IN-85-025-XO6 Category 88 Confidentiality: ___ YES ___NO(I&H)
Supervisor Notified: _X__iES ___ NO NUCLEAR SAFETY RELATED
__YES__
Concern:
DEPARTMENT (KNOWN) PERSONNEL FALSIFIED MAINTENANCE REQUESTS AT THE DIRECTION OF SUPERVISION (NAME KNOWN).
NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT CONCERN.
C/I HAS NO FURTHER INFORMATION.
..y--.~.-,
MANAGER, ERT DATE l
ECP Task Group has assigned responsibility for investigation of the
~ bove concern to:
a ERT ___
'NSRS/ERT _____
~
NSRS ______
OTHERS (SPECIFY) __[(_3__
/
.df ~
~ ~ pDATEh
~~~~~
ECP Task Group l
[..
EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST TO: Employee Concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50278 ERT has received the Employee concern idenbified
- below, and has assigned the indicated category and priority priority: 1 Concern #WI-85-068-003 Category: 53 Confidentiality: ___ YES ___NO(I&H)
Supervisor Notified: _X__YES ___ NO NUCLEAR SAFETY RELATED
__YES__
Concern:
A NONCONFORMANCE REPORT DOCUMENTING A QUALITY VIOLATION WAS VOIDED.
DETAILS KNOWN TO OTC, WITHHELD DUE TO CONFIDENTIALITY.
NO FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE RELEASED.
CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT CONCERN.
?
- .--=w--.:--.--
MANAGER, ERT DATE f,.ECP Task Group has assigned responsibility for investigation of the
, above concern to:
H. - ;a 4
ERT ___
'l NSRS/ERT _____
NSRS ______
b OTHERS (SPECIFY) ddNb...._.-----aaet ECP Task Group TE 9
1
.M*-.-
m EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST TO: Employee Concerns program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50278 ERT has received the Employee concern identified
- below, and has assigned the indicated category and priority:
Priority: 1 Concern #WI-85-068-002 Category: 52 Confidentiality: ___ YES ___NO(ISH)
Supervisor Notified: _X__YES ___ NO NUCLEAR SAFETY RELATED
_YES_
Concerns CABLE TRAY MAY HAVE BEEN REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER DOCUMENTATION.
DETAILS KNOWN TO OTC, WITHHELD DUE TO CONFIDENTIALITY.
NO FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE RELEASED.
CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT CONCERN.
m_..._
O MANAGER, ERT DATE ECP Task Group has assigned responsibility for investigation of the above concern tos l
ERT ___
l l
N9RS/ERT _____
i NSRS ______
OTHsRS (SPeCIFv> ___g5G_I'JG_________________________________________
.LY______________3 z.n CP Task Oroup TE l
b
'et 5-M eM $e' g..,
g
..m.
a
,g
EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST TO: Employee Concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50278 ERT has received the Employee concern identified
- below, and han assigned the indicated category and priority:
Priority: 1 Concern #WBP-6-025-X01 Category 53 Confidentiality: ___ YES NO(ISH)
Supervisor Notified: _X__YES ___ NO NUCLEAR SAFETY RELATED
__YES__
Concern TVA MANAGEMENT LACKS AGGRESSIVENESS AND EFFECTIVENESS IN RESOLVING QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY RELATED PROBLEMS.
MANAGEMENT IMPROPERLY UTILIZED INFORMATION PROVIDED THEM BY RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL, AND APPEARED NOT TO BE INTERESTED IN HEARING ABOUT OR RESOLVING SYSTEMATIC DESIGN AND QUALITY PROBLEMS.
NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT CONCERN.
C/I HAS NO FURTHER INFORMATION.
i MANAGER, ERT DATE ECP Task Group has assigned responsibility for investigation of the
_..,,;above concern tos
._ r '.
s ERT ___
,, :NSRS/ERT _____
NSRS ______
OTHERS (SPECIFY)
(I_3bh_
l
__________3 E' E6 ECP Task Group D TE e
l
EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST TO: Employee Concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50278 ERT has receivad the Employee concern identified
- below, and has assigned the indicated category and priority:
Priority: 1 Concern #WBP-6-025-X02 Category: 53 Confidentiality: ___ YES NO(ISH)
Supervisor Notified: _X__YES ___ NO NUCLEAR SAFETY RELATED
__YES__
Concern TVA DID NOT CONTROL NUCLEAR PLANT DESIGN ANALYSIS OR VERIFICATION ANALYSIS PROCESSES IN AN ADEQUATE MANNER.
NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT CONCERN.
CI HAS NO FURTHER INFORMATION.
S k d _____3/z 2 4 m-
. - -. ~, - -,....
MANAGER, ERT ATE
~
ECP Task Group has assigned responsibility for investigation of the
. ' 2, 'above concern to 51;,ipj,.MN m :
ERT ___
NSRS/ERT _____
NSRS ______
___ECh____ __________ _
k__ b___ __________'__
DEHERS (SPECIFY) s ECP ask Group ATE
~
""'*:. ~
~ ~. - --
~"
- * ~ ~^ 2 ~ ~ T
i EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST TO: Employee Concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50278 ERT has received the Employee concern identified
- below, and has assigned the indicated category and priority:
Priority: 1 Concern #WBP-6-025-XO3 Category: 53 Confidentiality: ___ YES ___NO(I&H)
Supervisor Notified: _X__YES ___ NO NUCLEAR SAFETY RELATED
__YES__
Concern INFORMATION PROVIDED TO MANAGEMENT REGARDING.OUALITY PROBLEMS WAS SOMETIMES " FILTERED" TO THE POINT WHERE TRENDS OR SYSTEMATIC ISSUES WERE OFTEN NOT IDENTIFIED.
NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT CONCERN.
C/I HAS NO FURTHER INFORMATION.
$b MANAGER, ERT DATE ECP Task Group has assigned responsibility for investigation of the
-iabove concern tos ERT ___
NSRS/ERT _____
NSRS ______
___fj()3h______________________
OTHERS (SPECIFY)
~ U !_I
.a ECP Task Group ATE
t EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST TO: Employee Concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50278 ERT has received the Employee concern identified
- below, and has assigned the indicated category and priority:
Priority: 1 Concern #WBP-6-025-XO4 Category: 53 Confidentiality: ___ YES ___NO(I&H)
Supervisor Notified: _X__YES ___ NO NUCLEAR SAFETY RELATED
__YES__
Concern SENIOR TVA MANAGEMENT HAS BEEN SPECIFICALLY NOTIFIED OF QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY PROBLEMS, AND HAS FAILED TO TAKE APPROPRIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION.
DETAILS KNOWN TO
- OTC, WITHHELD DUE TO CONFIDENTIALITY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE RELEASED.
NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT CONCERN.
..,.,n...n..,-
MANAGER, ERT DATE ECA Task Group has assigned responsibility for investigation of the above concern tos l
. ERT ___
NSRS/ERT _____
NSRS ______
OfHERS (SPECIFY)
___Jh_________________________
_WA ___!____________3_ ' H ECP Task Group ATE i
i
EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST TO:
Employee concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50277 Task Group ERT has received the Employee concern identified
- below, and has assigned the indicated category and priority:
Priority: 1 Concern #
SQP-6-011-001 Category: 53 Confidentiality:
Yes No(I&H)
Supervisor Notified:
Yes_X No Nuclear Safety Related No Concern:
THE FUEL TRANSFER SYSTEM WAS UPGRADED FROM NON-QA TO A
QA LEVEL II; HOWEVER THERE ARE NO "AS CONSTRUCTED" DRAWINGS.
NUCLEAR POWER CONCERN.
CI HAS NO FURTHER INFORMATION.
NO FOLLOWUP IS REQUIRED.
W 3/J/f[s Manager, ERT
'date ECP Task Group has assigned responsibility for investigation of the above concern to:
ERT NSRS/ERT
/
NSRS OTHERS (SPECIFY)
'f Cf c5,-
% 3/ziff6
' AJ_
'CP
/
date
g
- 8 EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST TO:
Employee Concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50277 Task Group ERT.has received the-Employee concern identified
- below, and has assigned the indicated category and priority:
Priority:3
~ Concern #
WBP-6-024-001 Category: 86 Confidentiality:
Yes No(I&H)
Supervisor Notified:
Yes_X No Nuclear Safety Related_NO Concern:
WIDOWS CREEK-TVA HAS BEEN WASTING MATERIALS FOR YEARS, e.g.,
EMPLOYEES WERE REQUIRED TO HAUL OUT VALVES FROM A BASEMENT AS FAST AS THEY COULD TO BE BURIED.
NUCLEAR POWER CONCERN.
CI HAS NO FURTHER INFORMATION.
1 l
0$
d 3/is/r4 l
Manager, ERT
' date ECP Task Group has assigned responsibility for investigation of the 1
above concern to:
ERT 8
NSRS/ERT NSRS OTHERS (SPECIFY)
[C7(~, -
1//16 2
'BCP
~
~'
/
date
r.
N EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST J
TO:
Employee Concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50277 Task Group ERT has received the Employee concern identified
- below, and has cssigned the indicated category and priority:
Priority: 4 Concern #
SOP-6-012-001 Category: 86 Confidentiality:
Yes No(I&H)
Supervisor Notified:
Yes x
No Nuclear Safety Related No
. EMPLOYEES WHO QUESTION A WORK PLAN AS TO WHETHER THEY ARE IN Concern:
VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT ARE SOMETIMES ANSWERED WITH,
" DUMMY, YOU COULD DO THAT."
THIS TYPE OF ANSWER IS PERCEIVED BY THE EMPLOYEES AS SUPERVISION THINKING THEY ARE STUPID FOR EVEN QUESTIONING A
POSSIBLE REQUIREMENT VIOLATION.
NUCLEAR POWER CONCERN.
CI HAS NO FURTHER INFORMATION.
NO FOLLOWUP REQUIRED.
bf 3l/Slfb Manager, ERT
'date ECP Task Group has assigned responsibility for investigation of the above concern to:
ERT NSRS/ERT
/
NSRS OTHERS (SPECIFY)
EC/ b- -
hrs-3/>d:s
'Ub'78, dikrs CP
/
[~date w
EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST TO:
Employee Concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50277 Task Group ERT has-received the Employee concern identified
- below, and has assigned the indicated category and priority:
Priority: 4 Concern #
SQP-6-013-001 Category:86 Confidentiality:
Yes No(I5H)
Supervisor Notified:
Yes X
No Nuclear Safety Related NO Concern:
THE CRAFT OFTEN TRIES TO PREVENT THE JOB FROM BEING ' COMPLETED SO AS TO DRAG THE JOB OUT, e.g.,
. QUESTION PROCEDURES AND WORK PLANS.
NUCLEAR POWER CONCERN.
CI HAS MO FURT!!ER INFORMATION, NO FOLLOWUP REQUIRED.
i i
t/A f 3lGlff Manager, ERT
' d' ate ECP Task Group has assigned responsibility for investigation of the above Concern to:
t ERT NSRS/ERT NSRS e~
OTHERS (EPECIFY) w/F
% Wulh NW a/u//s
'L>Cp
/
d' te a
l
- ( 7 EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST Employee Concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50277 TO:.
Task Group
'ERT has received the Employee concern identified 'belov, and has assigned th.t indicated category and priority:
Priority: 4 Concern #
SQP-6-013-002 Category: 86 Confidentiality:
Yes No(I&H)
Supervisor Notified:
Yes X
No Nuclear Safety Related_NO_
Concern:
OVERTIME AMONG CRAFT IS NOT DISTRIBUTED FAIRLY. NUCLEAR POWER CONCERN.
CI HAS NO FURTHER INFORMATION.
NO FOLLOWUP INFORMATION.
0$
9)W/h Manager, ERT
'date ECP Task Group has assigned responsibility for investigation of the above concern to:
ERT NSRS/ERT NSRS OTHERS (SPECIFY)
- I
% *M' d,)&f
% B6 Tcp
(
~date i,
)
m EMPLOYEE CONCERN ASSIGNMENT REQUEST TO:
Employee Concerns Program TRANSMITTAL NUMBER T50277 Task Group ERT has received the Employee concern identified
- below, and has assigned the indicated category and priority:
Priority: 1 Concern #
IN-85-585-002 Category:53 Confidentiality:
Yes No(I&H)
Supervisor Notified:
X Yes No Nuclear Safety Related_NO _
Concern:
WORKERS REPORTING 110 NEST MISTAKES ARE SUBJECT TO SUSPENSION.
e.g., LISTING THE Wh0NG WELDING PROCEDURE ON A ROD CHIT, OR USING A ROD CHIT WITH THE WRONG PROCEDURE, EVEN THOUGH THE TWO PROCEDURES (SUCH AS HANGER WELDING SMP-1 AND SMU-1) ARE IDENTICAL WITH REGARD TO
- PROCESS, ELECTRODE, TECHNIQUE, HEAT AND AMPERAGE.
SPECIFIC INCIDENT KNOWN TO
- QTQ, WITHHELD DDE TO CONFIDENTIALITY.
NO FURTHER INFORMATION.MAY BE RELEASED.- CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT CONCERN.
0$
M4d"~
3ll2lfA Manager, ERT date ECP Task Group bac assigned responsibility for investigation of the above concern to:
ERT NSRS/ERT
.g A
NSRS OTHERS (SPECIFY)[{-[d-LJ /A-72, hkr
~AP J
bate
.1
r
~
.f,g, 3-
.+ y
. V +
.c S.
,9
- 5. ".[ct.1 n.- -.;4fb!h.'s,. '. E. 5 9:
' ? $ . U.'.,d, - S2,'r.,'.'[
' ' s%{"A id.5 -i 2,
i-4..:., 9.::.g u-
~ =c,.a,. &A ;. + 2:.m.. - 7g -T(;
u:.' ;
vy; - -.
a..
,. +. -.
n,,
~.,. -
- y; -
ENCLOSURE _5 2...
~e.. : --
. CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSES BY THE LINE ORGANIZATIONS AND EVALUATED BY THE NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW STAFF FOR ADEQUACY RESPONSE TO CONCERN NUMBERS:_
f IA-Bo-M - KI 3 Irl-%- IQB - CDR
\\ ~BS-C7D - NP3 Xx-85'- @p-coa Xx - es-ots -c0 I e
w O
e O
J'.o.
g a
g
- } } w bdA.A t
AUO 0 7 1935 Tennessee Valley Authority i
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
- Page !
{
Form BF-5 i
BF 1.2 & 2.3 STANDARD PRACTICE /PERMANEtc INSTRUC !ON CHANGE INFORMAT Standard ' Practice / Inst ruct ion
(,
MAI-4 Unit 1.2,3 6itle i
l ROLT ANCHORS SET IN HARDENED CONCRETE a-PERMANE?C INSTRUCTION CHANGE l
Is this a workplan_ initiated change?
Yes ___ (Workplan No._
) No. X Does this implement, delete, or change a reference to a vendor manual?
~
Yes X No
]
If yes DCC Vendor Manual Coordinator signature is required.
8
/
Vendor Manual Coordinator j..
Does this implement, delete, or change an SI data cover sheet?
Date Yes X No If yes. Planning and Scheduling supervisor signature is requitec.
/
=
Planning & Scheculing
~
If item added, deleted. or frequency changed on IE (or CSSC) PM requirements.
Date co=plete BF-111.
]
STANDARD PRACTICE C.ANCE Is QA review required ptior to issuance?
l Yes No Is PORC review required prior to issuance?
Yes (See attachment 2 of standard practice BF-1.2.)
No j
Quality Assurance program requirements have been properly included.
/
j Quality Assurance Supv.
Date
~
Intent change in procedural detail of FSAR or other licensing document?
Yes No X f'
New Inst:;uction?
Yes No V
If yes to either of these questions. a US'QD is required.
Is this change in response to an I.ER. IE bulletin NRC inspection report.
management / supervisor inspection. OQAB audit. etc?
If yes specify document under reason for revision.
Yes No X
Was this change made to meet an NRC cot mitment?
~
_.Yes No X
If yes to either question. refer to BF-2.3 for proper identification of the change.
Does this revision implement a source document?
is _ __,,Yes No
-X, If yesi attach form BF-4 Due date of form BF-4 l
Fire Protection System involved?
Security System involved?
MA.
/ _
NA
/
s Fire Protection Engineer Date PuDtic Sarety Supervtsor Date
'~
David Winchestei M Mod
/ 11-4-85 / 3729 Submttted by Section Date Phone'Numoer
{.
Revtewed by I.
FN See BF-1.2 for standard practices.
/ f_g/g@
ResponstDie Section Supv.
Date v*
The requirements herein are conststent with safe e'
pl. int operation 3
(
ll^
n fd
.K_.njug;
~
,Date p atit'Hanager
!Q@
PORC Chatrman w.__.
uJ I
851113-05 DP6CU Job No.
- Revision L1
- Page 2 Tennessee Valley Authority Form BF-5 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant BF 1.2. & 2.3 l
April 10, 1985 8
STANDARD PRACTICE /PERMANE?C INSTRUCTION CHANGE INFORMATION (Continued)
REVISION LOG i
Standard Practice / Instruction BF MAI-4 APPROVAL DATE PAGES AFFECTED REASON FOR REVISION
(
\\
07/29/83 All 08/1I/83 9
08/30/83 10 I
05/18/84 9
10/30/84 10 To add the additional space to maintain traceability in CSSC tools and calibration dates.
1/25/35 All General revision.
(850124-04) 09/26/85 All General Revision.
(850815-02)
I 10/15/85 17 Ccerect errors in table 7.3.5.1.
(851008-01) 17.31,32 Dmissions in Table; DEC 02 12 delete sketch requirement.
(851113-05)
[
L L
DP&CU Job No.
851113-05 Total Number of Pages in Procedure: _ 36 Retention Period:
Lifetime Responsibility: DP&CU Supervisor
- Revision r
L
e vv'a e. tro-e<rg UNIT $D STATES GOVERNMENT a
Memorandum TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY R. P. Denise, Program Manager, Watts Bar Employee Concern Tas roup To Watts Bar Nuclear Plant OSP Guenter Wadewitz, Project Manager, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant OC FROM t
DATE
- March 20, 1986
SUBJECT:
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT - REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATICN/ EVALUATION Attached is our response to employee concern number IN-86-169-001.
Guenter Wadewitz#
C0C:JM QERT.CR Attachment 1
l
'lu l
)
-VY Buy U.S. Savines Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savines Plan
e e
Employee Concern: I-86-169-001 I-85-474-WBN Evaluation and Replacement of Conduit Recommendation:
Cable Replace the flexible conduits previously described, and evaluate and replace as necessary the associated cable.
Determine and eliminate the root cause of the damage.
These components are transferred to Watts Bar ONP, therefore,
Response
they are not under the direct control of OC.
According to Mr. Dan Thompson, NSB, the maintenance request A-477393 will
, require inspection and replacement as necessary.
The estimated completion date is March 14, 1986.
NOTE: Heat tracing circuits are not under the quality assurance program.
The root cause appears to be the grounding of welding leads through the conduit. Therefore, an agenda will be written for the March 31, 1986, safety meetings covering the proper methods of grounding while welding. All crafts will be made aware of the electrical hazards and destruction that can be caused by improper grounding techniques.
The potential hazard created by welding to close to conduits which may contain energized cables, will also be pointed out in this meeting.
i e
Employca C;nc:rn IN-86-169-001 NSRS Recommendation to I-85-474-WBN Emphasize Hazardous Condition Reporting I
?
I Reemphasize to construction personnel that potentially hazardous conditions noted during the performance of work activities should be immediately reported to the i
supervisors or designated organizations for corrective action. For clarit,v,
~
explain the established reporting methodology.
Response
In the March 31st safety meeting, it will be reemphasized to all construction employees at WBNP, that they must report all hazardous conditions immediately f
to their supervisor.
If it becomes evident that an employee was aware oY a situation which could endanger another employee and did not report it immedi-ately, further investigation will be made which could result in disciplinary action.
0 o
r "w
-. s.
4 ',7 e
2 my. : >..
7-
... - ~
~ <..,, z e:.r **
. r.-
=p::.;
..;.-; x.:_
- i.,
........, s
- ce-ENCLOSURE 4.
.y W ;7.,. 2 :.7.,.- ;.;.3;;.; :;; - p,
'NEW K-FORMS RECEIVED BY.THE EMPLOYEE CONCERN TASK GROUP AND NOT YET ASSIGNED FOR INVESTIGATION t
I K-es - ODS-COS" 4 091 - Ot I It4 ~ SS-OM - YOp Wi - 65~- C&B - CO3 wo - es-cse - apa W6P-6 -oM-Xo t LOdf 035 - Xoa LodP CDT-YO3 w69-6-OK-d 199 on - co i M6P Op4-cot MP Ola - Co l
@P-e - ots -co t SqP Ot 3 -coa 14 - BS -585-CD&
i l
A i
mee.
_ g 4
~
.m
.y-).
, gy y
=
ENCLOSURE 6 EMPLOYEE CONCERN SUMMARIES OF ACTIVE CONCERNS IDENTIFIED THROUGH THE NEW EMPLOYEE CONCERN PROGRAM 6
P' c-
NEW EMPLOYEE CONCERN PROGRAM LISTING THROUGH 03/21/86 ECP-86-CH-005-01
.ECP-86-CH-008-01 ECP-86-CH-011-01 ECP-86-SQ-002-01 ECP-86-SQ-006-01 ECP-86-SQ-006-01 ECP-86-SQ-018-01 ECP-86-SQ-008-01 ECP-86-SQ-010-01 ECP-86-SQ-011-01 ECP-86-SQ-015-01 ECP-86-SQ-017-01 ECP-86-SQ-020-01 ECP-86-SQ-027-01 ECP-86-SQ-028-01 ECP-86-SQ-044-01 ECP-86-SQ-045-01 ECP-86-SQ-046-01 ECP-86-SQ-047-01 ECP-86-SQ-042-01 ECP-86-SQ-109-01 ECP-86-SQ-110-01 ECP-86-SQ-111-01 ECP-86-SQ-112-01 ECP-86-SQ-115-01 ECP-86-SQ-124-01 ECP-86-SQ-125-01 ECP-86-SQ-125-02 ECP-86-SQ-125-03 ECP-86-SQ-125-04 ECP-86-KX-001-01 ECP-86-KX-002-01 ECP-86-KX-007-01 ECP-86-KX-011-01 ECP-86-KX-007-02 ECP-86-KX-016-01 ECP-86-KX-018-01 ECP-86-KX-026-01 l
l Page 1 of 3 03/21/86 e
i I
NEW EMPLOYEE CONCERN PROGRAM LISTING TIIROUGli 03/21/86 (Continued)
ECP-86-BF-131-002 ECP-86-BF-132-001 ECP-86-BF-138-001 ECP-86-BF-110-001 ECP-86-BF-144-001 ECP-86-BF-131-001 ECP-86-BF-084-001 ECP-86-BF-095-001 ECP-86-BF-109-001 ECP-86-BF-077-001 ECP-86-BF-077-002 ECP-86-BF-079-001 ECP-86-BF-069-001 ECP-86-BF-071-001 ECP-86-BF-074-001 ECP-86-BF-157-001 ECP-86-BF-163-001 ECP-86-BF-141-001 ECP-86-BF-143-001 ECP-86-BF-154-001 ECP-86-BF-182-001 ECP-86-BF-082-001 ECP-86-BF-155-001 ECP-86-BF-156-001 ECP-86-BF-186-001 ECP-86-BF-186-002 ECP-86-BF-198-001 ECP-86-BF-199-001 ECP-86-BF-212-001 ECP-86-BF-214-001 ECP-86-BF-215-001 ECP-86-BF-200-001 ECP-86-BF-200-002 E;i'-86-BF-220-001 ECP-36-BL-004-001
~
ECP-86-BL-002-001 ECP-86-BL-020-001 ECP-86-BL-022-001 ECP-86-BL-026-001 i
Page 2 of 3 03/21/86 i-
NEW EMPLOYEE CONCERN PROGRAM LISTING THROUGli 03/21/86 (Continued)
ECP-86-WB-002-01 ECP-86-WB-006-01 ECP-86-WB-007-01 ECP-86-WB-007-02 ECP-86-WB-008-01 ECP-86-WB-011-01 ECP-86-WB-020-01 ECP-86-WB-021-01 ECP-86-WB-022-01 ECP-86-WB-023-01 ECP-86-WB-024-01 ECP-86-WB-025-01 ECP-86-WB-026-01 ECP-86-WB-038-01 ECP-86-WB-044-01 ECP-86-WB-046-01 ECP-86-WB-056-01 ECP-86-WB-057-01 ECP-86-WB-057-02 ECP-86-WB-oS7-03 ECP-86-WB-058-01 ECP-86-WB-062-01 ECP-86-WB-064-01 ECP-86-WB-069-01 ECP-86-WB-022-01 ECP-86-WB-077-01 ECP-86-WB-073-01 1
ECP-86-WB-084-01 ECP-86-WB-088-01 ECP-86-WB-088-02 l
ECP-86-WB-095-01 ECP-86-WB-098-01 ECP-86-WB-125-01 ECP-86-WB-130-01 l
ECP-86-WB-134-01 ECP-86-WB-137-01 l
I l
l l
r l
Page 3 of 3 03/21/86 L
r
.a Concern No. ECP-86-CH-005-01 Receipt mode Mailer Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change
- Date received 02/13/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Draftsman concerned of CAD systems installed and draftsmen were not sent for training on use.
Only SE-5 and SE-6's are being trained.
Status:
Report sent to line. Awaiting response.
Concern No. ECP-86-CH-008-01 Receipt mede Walk-in Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/26/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
Bad service review which was based on supervisor's feeling.
Status:
Resolution plans currently being discussed.
Concern No. ECP-86-CH-011-01 Receipt mode Phone category Mgt & Personnel New X
Update Closure No Change Date received 02/28/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Contract employee has not been paid by employer.
Status:
Closure pending report.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-002-01 Receipt mode Phone Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/06/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. believes termination paperwork incorrect.
Status:
Termination papers were corrected - report in typing.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-006-01 Receipt mode Exit Category SF New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/10/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. believes there should be a medical nurse on 3rd shift.
t Status:
Investigation complete - report in typing.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-018-01 Receipt mode Phone Category Hgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/03/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. believes favoritism and improper management activities occuring in Plant Administrative Services Unit.
Status:
Investigation and report completed by line organization corrective actions currently being taken - followups to be conducted.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-008-01 Receipt mode Phone Category Mgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/11/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. believes TVA should give credit (seniority) to him and three other employees who had previously worked in Construction and are now on temporary appointment in Modifications.
Status:
Investigating.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-010-01 Receipt mode Walk-in Category Mgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/18/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Trainee (at POTC) believes instruction is inadequate and t'ests are unfair and graded improperly.
Status:
Investigation complete - report in typing.
f Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-011-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Engineering New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/18/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary; C.I. believes a specific engineer is not knowledgeable of work requirements, and maintenance work planning is poor.
Status:
Investigation complete - report in typing.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
=.
N
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-015-01 Receipt mode Walk-in Category IH New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. cites 11 instances of alleged intimidation and harassment in the QC Section, and management has known of problems and done nothing.
Status:
QTC also investigating. QTC report to be reviewed before determining how to proceed.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-017-01 Receipt mode Walk-in Category Ngt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/24/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related _ No Summary:
C.I. believes (1) his PHR improperly reflects past disciplinary action and (2) veterans are discriminated against.
Status:
(1) asked SQ Personnel to investigate (2) investigation initiated by ECP-SR.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-020-01 Receipt mode PI-Anon Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/26/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. claims two specific i6dividuals are cocaine users.
Status:
Investigation complete - report in typing.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS t
j
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-027-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/28/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. believes (1) veterans are being discriminated against and (2) he was unfairly reprimanded by a management employee.
Status:
Investigation initiated by ECP-SR.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-028-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/28/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. believes (1) veterans are being discriminated against and (2) press and media only spotlight the negative news about SQ and ignore the positive.
Status:
Investigation initiated by ECP-SR.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-044-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/07/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No l
Summary:
C.I. believes other veterans who hired in from Construction are being allowed to stay on the job, but he isn't.
Status:
Investigation initiated.
I I
i l
03/21/86 l ECP CONCERNS l
t
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-045-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/07/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. is concerned that sloppy maintenance practices that existed in 1981-1983 may still exist.
C.I. is exiting from h0DS but is concerned that maintenance management problems may still exist.
Status:
Investigation complete-report in typing.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-046-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/07/86-Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. believs temporary personnel are being laid off, even though there is work, so they won't acenmulate one year and permanent personnel won't be affected.
Status:
Investigation initiated.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-047-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/07/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summa ry:
C.I. believes that non-veterans and " friends" are being hired from the union hall for temporary positions.
C.I. believes veterans should have preference to an extent in hiring and lay-offs of temporaries.
Status:
Investigation initiated.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-042-01 Receipt mode Phone Category I&H @ POTC New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/13/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. believes technical supervision is harassing her because she filed an EE0 complaint about cigarette smoking.
C.I. says others in the section have been harassed in the past for various reasons.
Status:
Copy of file given to ECP Manager for turnover to Inspector General.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-109-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/14/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. concerned that 1) a General Forman was allowed to qualify as a welder af ter failing the test twice, 2) service reviews (form 77s) are altered af ter being completed foremen.
Status:
Investigation initiated.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-110-01 Receipt mode Exit-Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/14/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No
~
Summa ry:
C.I. concerned that TVA contracted to the low bidder to do maia steam relief instrument piping work and work was shoddy and had to be redone by TVA.
Status:
Investigation not yet initiated.
03/21/86 ECP CONCEhNS
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-111-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/14/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. would like an explanation why four steamfitters were allowed to keep their seniority when this is not TVA policy in the past.
Status:
Investigating.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-112-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/14/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. believes 1) equipment should be walked down periodically because it is damaged in outages (small tubing, piping, conduit)
- 2) non-vets are discriminated against by the Veteran's Preference Act.
Status:
Investigating.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-115-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New x
Update Closure No Change Date received 03/18/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. believes temporary workers are terminated prior to having one year in service so that they won't have one year of service and won't become permanent.
Status:
Just received.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS i
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-124-01 Receipt mode Exit Category QA/QC New X
Update Closure No Change Date received 03/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety He]ated No Summary:
C.I. believes QC does not check for proper hanger location.
J Status:
Just received.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-125-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New X
Update Closure No Change Date received 03/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. concerned that TVA contracted to the low bidder to do main steam relief instrument piping work and work was shoddy and had to be redone by TVA.
Status:
Investigation not yet initiated.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-125-02 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New X
Update Closure No Change Date received 03/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. charges that a specific individual is a drug user.
Status:
Informed SQ Personnel Officer - individual to be drug tested.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-125-03 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New X
Update Closure No Change Date received 03/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. believes he is being layed off prior to having one year in service so that he cannot obtain a permanent appointment.
. Status:
Just received.
Concern No. ECP-86-SQ-125-04 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New X
Update Closure No Change Date received 03/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. believes certain management personnel are "in-sighting" and creating friction among their people and causing low morale.
Status:
Just received.
Concern No. ECP-86-KX-001-01 Receipt mode PI-Anon Category Engineering New Update Closure X
No Change Date received 02/10/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related Possible Summa ry: Concerned individual states that fake information was given to NRC representative by the Watts Bar Electrical Design Project flanagement.
Status:
Not substantiated. Final report signed. OE management briefed on results. CI has been given results of investigation.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-KX-002-01 Receipt mode Walk-in Category Engineering New Update-X Closure No Change Date received 02/10/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: SE-5/SE-6 Engineering Associates on the Bellefonte Mechanical Design Project are no longer permitted to sign design drawings per new management policy. Affecting morale and quality of work.
Status:
Waiting on additional information from concerned individual.
Per 3/11 telephone contact with CI, it appears this may be resolved in the line.
CI will let ECP-SR know of progress.
Concern No. ECP-86-KX-007-01 Receipt mode Referral Category Material Cont.
New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/19/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: OE employee asserts that Watts Bar warehouse material control practices need to be changed.
Status:
Draft response prepared by PM0 Of fice.
Submittal to ECP-SR delayed because of change in PMO.
New project manager wants to review.
Concern No. ECP-86-KX-011-01 Receipt mode Phone Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/26/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: SA-1 Office Supervisors (2) in OE management staff have raised issue that other SA-2s in OE supervise the same number (or less).
SA-l's therefore should be upgraded or SA-2s downgraded.
CIs also want back pay.
Status:
Investigation complete - report in final draf t.
SA-2's will be demoted but CIs will get no back pay.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
m Concern No. ECP-86-KX-007-02 Receipt mode Ref/line Category Mgt&Pers ISSUES New Update X
Closure No Change
'Date received 02/19/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: OE Employee concerned that Watts Bar warehouse practices have been costly to TVA.
Status:
Draft responses prepared by PHO Officer. Submittaled to ECP-SR delayed because of change in PMO. New project manager wants to review.
Concern No. ECP-86-KX-016-01 Receipt mode Anon MI Catego ry QA/QC New x
Update Closure No Change Date received 03/10/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related yes Summary: CI states that TVA does not have a configuration control system.
There are presently DOE, Air Force, Navy, and NASA people employed by TVA with extensive configuration control experience. They should be used.
Status:
Forwarded to Zia Kabira for preparation of a draft response. Have asked for draf t response by 04/07/86.
Concern No. ECP-86-KX-018-01 Receipt mode phone Category Ind. Safety New Update x
Closure No Change Date received 03/12/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
12th Floor, West Tower, emergency floor captain concerned that emergency speakers (PA) sound level too low. Also some speakers are inoperable.
Status:
Line management responding after employee came to ECP-SR.
Inoperable speakers repaired - sound level test planned.
4 03/21/86 EC,P CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-KX-026-01 Receipt mode MI Category QA/QC New x
Update Closure No Change Date received 03/18/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summa ry: OE employee states there is no timely method for employees who file an SCR or CAQ to know what corrective action was taken, and there is no requirement for timely closure of SCR's.
Status:
No accessment underway as yet.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-131-002 Receipt mode Exit Category Construction New Update Closure No Change x
Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Conduit strap bolts / nuts are being overtorqued since torque wrenches will continue to turn them at the same setting when retried.
Status:
Static - no investigation change.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-132-001 Receipt mode Exit Catggory. Operations New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Same as 86-BF-131-001 Status:
Same as 86-BF-131-001 03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-138-001 Receipt mode Exit Category QA/QC New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
Individual believes QC iitspeptors not properly qualified /
expeienced.
Status:
Combined with 86-BF-069-001 and awaiting results of that investigation.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-110-001 Receipt mode Exit __ Category SF New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
Individual feels that placing of temporary power cables, etc.,
should be by electricians.
Recent fire in Unit 2 torus due to improper placement caused personnel to raise concern in saf ety meetings, but no answer was received.
Status:
Investigation report complete - to EKS 03/13/86.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-144-001 Receipt mode Exit Category SF New Update Closure No Change X
i Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Same as for 86-BF-110-001.
Status:
Same as for 86-BF-110-001.
?
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS L_
r-Concern No. ECP-86-BF-131-001 Receipt mode Exit Category Operations New Update
-X Closure No Change Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summa ry: Supervision (foreman and above) are emphasizing / encouraging T&L workers to stay in C zones / regulated areas even if they have finished their work and had nothing else to do rather than come out Status:
Investigation report to EKS - 03/19/86.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-084-001 Receipt mode Exit Category SF New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/14/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Tanks, pumps, piping, etc. in the acid portion of the water treat-ment system in the IPS has deteriorated to the extent that unsafe working conditions exist.
Status:
Static pending conversation with safety engineer and operations personnel.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-095-001 Receipt mode _ Phone Category Operations New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 01/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: External dewatering system"for BfN may provide a path to the environment for radiological contamination.
Status:
Investigation report complete.
Awaiting line response.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
i Concern No. ECP-86-BF-109-001 Receipt mode __ Exit Category Operations New Update X __ -C1csure No Change Date received 02/21/86 Date closed _
Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Pump leaking for an extended period of time next to the dress out area in RB, U2,_elev 593.
Status:
Investigation repart to EKS 03/13/86.
Concern'No. ECP-86-BF-077-001 Receipt mode Walk-in Category IH New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/11/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No.
Summary:
Individual believes he has been subject to a threat (intimidation) by his foreman to the effect he was going to be run off if he didn't stop having concerns and requesting to see the Site Director Status:
Awaiting line response.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-077-002 Receipt mode Walk-in Category IH New Updite X
Closure No Change Date received 02/11/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
Individual feels he has been harassed by his general foreman in retaliation / reaction to questions and expressions regarding supervisions decisions and methods.
Status:
Investigation _ report to EKS 03/18/86.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS 1
E Coneern No. ECP-36-BF-079-001 Receipt mode _ Mail-in Category EN New Update
. Date closed No Change Yes Date received 02/13/86'
_ Closure X
Nuclear Safety Related Susanary:
Individual feels that maintenance planne_rs are desigpated by standard practice. BF 7.6 to be the only pers,ons to._ complete MR ___
work inst ructions and believes they,are not _ qualified personnel.
Status:
Reviewing MR's to determine adequacy of work instruction and CSSC
~ designation.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-069-001 Receipt mode Mail-in Category Q4/QC New Opdate x_
Closure No Change Date received 02/04/86 Da'te closed Nuclear Safety Related Yes 4
Sunnuary: Anony.tcus. concern regarding the certitication of QC inspectors and -
the QC inspector certification process (2 anonymous letters dated IE/04/85 and 02/03/86).
' Status:
NUC PR investigation underway by L. Mills.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-071-001 Receipt mode Mail-in Category tJgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 01-30-36 Date closed __
Nuclear Safety Re16ted No Susana ry: Anonyrreus concern (by "Several Hechanical Engineers) on the the Mechani' al Modifications Sopervisor. The designation of c
concerb is that__he is not qualified and represents e conflict of
. interest.
(He is a Contractor.)
Status:
EKS reque.=ted to consult and request M. Taylor to provide personnel investigation resources to investigate concern.
g 03/A1/86 FCP CONCERNS L
t Concern No. ECP-86-BF-074-001-Receipt mode Walk-in Category IH New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/10/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: CI (AUO) feels __ tilat due to his having come forward with a concern, he has been harrassed by his operations group being changed.
Status:
ECP status still in hold.
CI has discussed with the Plant Manager.
CI has indicated possibility of,. resolution, awaiting confirmation letter t6 Dentca. _
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-157 001 Receipt made _ Mail-in Category Construction New Updhte X
Clospre No Change Date received 02/27/86~ Date closed Nuclear Safety Related Yes Summaryr Usuage of sledge hammers to. drive steel shims between torus ring he'id6r piping and support collars da' ages piping and piping may be m
overstressed.
Status:
Reviewed TokbS_ long term rsport f rom OE.
-a Concern No. ECP-86-BF-163-001 Receipt mode Exit Category Construction New _
__ Update X
Closure No Change __
Date received 02/27/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related Yes Summary: Procedures may not have been followed in the proper installation of anchor bolt in a baceplate for U2 HPCI line support.
Status:
Intervicted 2 QC personnel and OE engineer on undercut anchors.
St'l] investigating.
03/21/86,
ECP CONCERUS i
)
r Concern No. ECP-86-BF-141-001 Receipt mode Exit Category Construction New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Unapproved tools (sharpened broom handles) were used to breach penetrations.
Status:
Reviewed MMI-75 on method of breaching penetration and interviewed John Crowell of Plant Maintenance.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-143-001 Receipt mode Exit Category SF New Update Closure No Change _
X Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summa ry: Management would not allow drywell plugs to be removed while men were working in the drywell.
Status:
Interviewed Steve Logan, Plant Safety engineer.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-154-001 Receipt mode Mail-in Category Hgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Under the new BFN organization, I&C employees are under the direct supervision of electricians.
Status:
Investigation report to EKS 03/19/86 03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-182-001 Receipt mode Exit Category Construction New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/28/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Workmanship on non-CSSC systems and components is not performed in good workmanlike manner. There should be a good practice guide-line for non-CSSC work such as the National Electrical Code.
Status:
Static - No ongoing investigation.
s Concern No. ECP-86-BF-082-001 Receipt mode MI Categcry Construction New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/14/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Flow and mechanical drawings not legible.
Status:
Investigation report to EKS 03/17/86.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-155-001 Receipt mode MI Category Hgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/26/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related X
Summary: Personnel in Modifications' group need some kind of system to allow workers on evening and midnight shifts to rotate to day shift.
Status:
Investigation report to EKS 03/18/86.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS J
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-156-001 Receipt mode MI Category QA/QC New Update Closure No Change Date received 02/26/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related X
Summary: After voicing concerns with QA/QC organizational problems, the CI's certifications to fulfill his job description were pulled.
Status:
Combined with investigative effort underway by G. Turner began week of 03/10/86.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-186-001 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/28/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No _
Summary: A foreman is always hurrying and threatening his workers that if they don't stay busy, he'll have to put them down to Elev. 519.
Status:
Investigating minimal plan interview with foreman week of 03/24/86.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-186-002 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received O M 8/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
If management does not thirik that workers from Local 760 are doing a good job, fire them.
If management is not telling the truth about Local 760 workers, fire the managers.
Status:
Investigation minimal - to draft report week of 03/24/86.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-198-001 Receipt mode MI Category Mgt & Personnel New
__ Update Closure No Change Y
Date received 03/04/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
Inadequate space and de.ument storage for important Electrical Maintenance work.
Status:
Awaiting resolution by line organization.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-199-001 Receipt mode MI Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/03/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related
'X Summary: Electricians informed to perform work not in accord with the procedure on verification of conduit supports in Class I structures Status:
Investigation complete - have made verbal recommendation to line to stop work in progress - investigation report to be written week of 03/29/86.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-212-001 Receipt mode MI Category Mgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 03/07/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related X
Summary: TVA's policy deviates when applied to salaries where the same job is accomplished by different personnel.
Status:
Talked with CI and supervisor - issue on hold awaiting management administrative action.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
7_-
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-214-001 Receipt mode MI Category Operations New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 03/12/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related X
Summa ry: Possible leaks of reactor water to environment from RHR heat exchanger floating head gaskets joint or degraded tube bundle due to design and material problems.
Status:
Static - no investigative progress.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-215-001 Receipt mode MI Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/12/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summa ry: Electrician foreman are forced to work overtime even though they don't want to and others are available.
Status:
Investigation report complete - to be sent to EKS 03/24/86.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-200-001 Receipt mode MI Category Mgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 03/05/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summa ry: Employee i concerned for his safety in being forced to work overtime (inidnight to noon) and refuses to work overtime.
Status:
Concern to be combined with investigative effort by G. Turner began week of 03/10/86.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-200-002 Receipt mode MI Category QA/QC New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 03/05/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related Yes Summary: QC inspectors are told to sign off hold points by their supervisors.
Status:
Concern to be combined with investigative effort by G. Turner began week of 03/10/86.
Concern No. ECP-86-BF-220-001 Receipt mode MI Category QA/QC New X
Update Closure No Change Date received 03/17/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related Yes Summary: Craft supervisor pressuring QC inspectors to approve inspection that did not meet acceptance criteria.
Status:
Concern to be combiacd with investigative effort by G. Turner began week of 03/10/86.
Concern No. ECP-86-BL-004-001 Receipt mode Mail-in Category Construction New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Random occurrence of hairline cracks in concrete protective coatings (carboline 305) especially around embedded plates, unist, and construction joints.
Status:
NRC 4779 issued and submitted to OE.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-BL-002-001 Receipt mode Mail-in Category Construction New Update X-Closure No Change X
Date received 02/04/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Flexhoses on reactor coolant pumps installed with mismatched flanges on the end mated to the pump nozzles. Gasket type and torque valves are questionable.
Status:
Investigation in progress.
Concern No. ECP-86-BL-020-001 Receipt mode _ Mailer Category Engineering New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 03/06/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related Yes Summary: Motor operated flow control valves for the fill'and drain lines to the core flooding tanks have improperly designed supports which could result in the failure of the piping during a seismic event.
Status:
Visual examination of the hardware did reveal the appearance of inadequate support. However, initial conversation with OE did result in justifications for the as-designed configuration.
Concern No. ECP-86-BL-022-001 Receipt mode MI Category M&PI New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/07/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: The attitude and disposition of some of the shift engineers is not conductive to safe and productive working conditions.
Status:
An initial interview has been performed with the concerned individual to obtain information not provided on mailer.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS J
Concern No. ECP-86-BL-026-001 Receipt mode Walk-in Category M&PI New X
Update Closure No Change Date received 03/19/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Bellefonte construction management have harassed and discriminated against the insulator craft. Work assignments have been made to favor electricians and proper management has not been given to insulators.
Status:
Although the concerned individual was insistent on using'the word " harassed", immediate discussion of that issue did not reveal any actions against individuals which could be classified as harassment.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-002-01 Receipt mode Call-in Category-Mgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/10/86 Date closed 02/12/86 Nuclear Safety Related No Summahy: C.I. felt veterans preference was not followed during recent lay-7 off in const. resulting in a veteran being laid off and a non-veteran being retained.
Status:
Ready for report.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-006-01 Receipt mode Referral Category Mgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/11/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Suggestion that all (or most) concerns be distributed to all employees. Benefits would be a reduction in redundant concerns and an opportunity for employees to see visible results of program.
Status:
Ready for report.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS i
l
Concern-No. ECP-86-WB-007-01 Receipt. mode Walk-in Category Mgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/12/86 Date closed 02/20/86 Nuclear Safety Related No Summa ry: During recent layoff, a nonveteran was set up as evening shift job steward when evaning shift was created two days before layoff.
C.I. says that general agreement only allows for one steward /craf t.
Status:
-Need report.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-007-02 Receipt mode Phone Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: During recent layoff, a nonveteran was set up as evening shif t job steward when evening shift was created two days before layoff.
This resulted in a veteran being laid off in his place.
Status:
Under investigation.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-008 01 Receipt mode Phone Category Mgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/12/86 Date closed 02/28/86 Nuclear Safety Related No Summary:
C.I. is on medical constraint (1981 neck injury).
C.I. and 4 or 5 others had medical re-evaluation on November 26, 1985 and was sent home.
C.I. wants to work.
Status:
Under investigation.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-011-01 Receipt mode Walk-in Category IH New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/13/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Employee claims multiple harassment for trying to prove safety and theft problems. He was also shift changed against the advice of VA doctor.
Status:
On hold - need access to QTC information.
Concern No. ECP-86-kB-020-01 Receipt mode Walk-in Category IH
-New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/18/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Employee is under notice of termination for falsification of records (info sent to insurance co. on TVA letterhead). Employee believes there was long-term plan to fire him.
Status:
On hold - need QTC information.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-021-01 Receipt mode Phone Category IH New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/19/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Epployee feels he is being singled by being written up for paper-Jork oversights that others get away with. He only transferred into unit 6 months and has been told he doesn't fit.
Status:
On hold - employee away for hearing.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS a
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-022-01 Receipt mode FC Category IH New Update X
Closure,
No Change Date received 02/19/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Employee feels supervisor practices I&H, causes high turnover rate and demoralization in unit.
Says he practiced wire-tapping and internal investigation glossed over it.
Status:
On hold - need QTC information.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-023-01 Receipt mode Mail-in Category Ngt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/20/86 Date closed 02/24/86 Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Employee finds birth control poster offensive.
Status:
Report to typing 03/22/86.
i Concern No. ECP-86-WB-024-01 Receipt mode LW Category IH New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/20/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Employee filed grievance against craft superintendent for being harassed. Several told "Why don' t you drag up?" Employee told he cypld not file grievance.
Status:
On hold - net 1 QTC information.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-025-01 Receipt mode Walk-in Category SF New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Single conductor thin cable used in cable trays of two office b1dgs (TS08 & OB). Employee states that this is against nec code and is a fire hazard.
Status:
Plant safety engineers investigation.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-026-01 Receipt mode Walk-in Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Scaffolding: Modifications carpenters are not permitted to build their own scaffolds.
Employee feels this is a safety problem and a waste of money while crafts wait for scaffolds.
Status:
Report back from Plant Safety.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-038-01 Receipt mode M-anon Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/27/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related Nc.
Summary: Employee feels that vans should not have special parking.
Claims that this was found to be illegal at other plants.
Status:
Ready for report.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
r_
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-044-01 Receipt mode SI Category IH New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/28/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No 1
Summary: Employee off work 2 /e months after auto accident.
Put on new shift when returned. Asked supervisor to provide time worked statement. Supervisor would not include 0.T. even though original shift had worked it.
Told employee, "Do it my way or get the hell
~
out of my office."
Status:
On hold - need QTC information.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-046-01 Receipt mode MI Q/C Category Mgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/27/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Local 175 out of Chattanooga is trying to run ERT off site because local wants to run things their way and can't do it with QTC around.
Status:
Under investigation.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-056-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Hgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/28/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Service reviews were downgraded two years ago (employees' and others') by supervisor.
3 levels removed from him. Reasons unknown.
Supervisor not familiar with their work.
Status:
Not started.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
r -
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-057-01 Receipt mode Exit Category Mgt & Personnel New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/28/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Employee was reassigned every six months which meant his service reviews were always at least from two supervisors. Feels this affected ratings.
Status:
Not started.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-057-02 Receipt mode Exit Category IH
'New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/28/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Employee was one of first interviewed by QTC. The'following week was transferred from days to 3rd. shift.
Feels offices were bugged.
Status:
Not started.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-057-03 Receipt mode Exit Category IH New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 02/28/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Received two week suspension' for not saying what supervisor's wanted employee to say about investigation.
Status:
Not started.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
r-Concern No. ECP-86-WB-058-01 Receipt mode M-anon-Category SF New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 02/28/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Sign shop in paint storage area has no ventilation and fire doors are propped open. Employee feels this is an unsafe working condition and a security violation.
Status:
Given to Plant Safety Section for investigation.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-062-01' Receipt mode ENT Intev Category Ngt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 3/03/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Employee's records do not show him as veteran.
Status:
Ready for report.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-064-01 Receipt mode Walk-in Category Hgt & Personnel New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/04/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related Yes Summary:
Instru. Mechs. (2) with only'4 months at nuclear plant have been selected for Sr. Instr. Mech (SIN) training. Employee feels that it will affect nuclear safety of the plant if they are set up as SIMs after training.
Status:
Under investigation.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-069-01 Receipt mode Walk-in-Category I&H New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 03/06/b6 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Employee feels he has been singled out by supervisor and harrassed.
Some of supervisor's actions have resulted in time of f for employee. Possible age discrimination.
Status:
Not started.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-022-02 Receipt mode FC Category MP New X
Update Closure No Change Date received 03/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Supervisor is unsafe, uses bad judgement and can't handle people under stress.
Status:
Not started.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-077-01 Receipt mode Walk-in Category IH New Update Closure No Change X
Date received 03/11/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Employee feels harassed by two other employees. They have spread false stories about his conduct at previous plant. llis supervisor has taken him off procedure writing where he feels he can make improvements because of experience gained.
Status:
Employee on leave all week.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-WB-073-01 Receipt mode Scheduled Category MP New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/10/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summa ry: Employee supervised higher grade managers in previous job and did not receive impact pay.
Status:
Knoxville personnel reviewing case.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-084-01 Receipt mode Walk-in* Category MP New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/13/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Employee understands that some craf ts (Teamsters, carpenters, sheetmetal, ironworkers) will no longer have direct union representation after b1dg. trades and council meet on March 18.
Status:
Negotiations broken off 03/20/86.
- Employee also sent taped message to Mr. White.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-088-01 Receipt mode Exit Category SF New Update X
Closure No Change.
Date received 03/13/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Plant Sewage System (NUC PR)'is temporarily hooked to Construction System. Employee is concerned that the sand filters in the NUC PR System don't work and that there will be problems when it is used in the future.
Status:
Ready for report.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-088-02 Receipt mode Exit Category SF New Update X
Closure No Change.
Date received 03/13/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: The transfer of hydrozine and ammonia in 55 gal. drums involves six different groups (OPS, chem lab, truck driver, fork lif t operator, and laborers. Employee feels there should be a safer, simpler way.
Status:
Being given to plant safety for comments.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-095-01 Receipt mode Walk-in Category IH New Update X
Closure No Change Date received 03/14/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related No Summary: Employee sent for drug screening right af ter grievance filed.
Employee also feels leave control center has not been used to help situation, but harass.
Status:
Under investigation.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-098-01 Receipt mode Exit Category IH New Update X
Closure No Change' Date received 03/14/86 Date closed
__ Nuclear Safety Related Summary: Employee requested meeting with higher supervisor. Wanted transfer because he felt harassed by foreman. He made threats about foreman (who was not present at the meeting).
He was fired.
Status:
On hold.
Grievance filed 03/20/86.
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
m t.
Concern No. ECP-86-WB-137-01 Receipt mode Exit Category IH New X
Update Closure No Change Date received 03/21/86 Date closed Nuclear Safety Related Summary: Employee notified QA of quality problems (after supervisor was repeatedly told about them and took no action). QA wrote several CAR's against unit. Employee had adverse comment put in 3031.
Status:
Not started.
9 0
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS
~
r~
Concern No.
Receipt mode Category New Update Closure No Change Date received Date closed Nuclear Safety Related Summary:
Status:
Concern No.
Receipt mode Category New Update Closure No Change Date received Date closed Nuclear Safety Related Summary:
1 Status:
Concern No.
Receipt mode Category New Update Closure No Change Date received Date closed Nuclear Safety Related Summa ry:
Status:
03/21/86 ECP CONCERNS u_.