ML20138M386

Requests Addl Info Re Rev 4 to Course of Action Submitted W/ .Written Confirmation Pager Sys for Contacting Reactor Engineering Personnel & Revised Shift Technical Adviser Attendance Procedures Requested

ML20138M386
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	12/05/1985
From:	Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Williams J TOLEDO EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8512200447
Download: ML20138M386 (4)

Text

-

D:cemb:r 5,1985 bbbOp Docket No. 50-346 DISTRIBUTION CDocket FilD JPartlow NRC PDR ADe Agazio Mr. Joe Williams, Jr. L PDR RIngram Vice President, Nuclear PB#6 Rdg ACRS-10 Toledo Edison Company FMiraglia GDick Edison Plaza - Stop 712 0 ELD GEdison 300 Madison Avenue EJordan WPaulson Toledo, Ohio 43652 BGrimes

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION We have partially reviewed Revision 4 to the Davis-Besse Course of Action submittal with your letter dated November 16, 1985 (No. 1208). We have identified additional information required with respect to your responses to questions 1 and 2 of our letter dated October 30, 1985 and with respect to certain revisions to Section II.B.1 and II.B.2 of the Course of Action. The additional information required is identified in the enclosure to this letter.

Please provide your responses no later than December 20, 1985.

On November 27, 1985, our staff held a telephone conference call with Mr. Wuokko and others on your staff to clarify several issues. One of these issues related to the availability of reactor engineering expertise to the Plant Manager with respect to assignment and working hours. We were told that this availability is accomplished through the duty roster and the use of a pager system to contact personnel. We were also told that the persons on the duty roster understand that the Plant Manager has the authority with respect to availability and work assignments. Please provide written confirmation of this system on the docket.

Another issue discussed in the conference call related to our position that the STA should participate in each shift turnover as a means of keeping the STA current on plant status. We were told that procedures have been rewritten to include STA attendance at all shift turnovers. Please provide a copy of the revised procedure.

The information requested in this letter affects fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance under P.L.96-511 is not required.

Sincetely, K i 3. .noz. ,

John F. Stolz, Director PWR Project Directorate #6 Division of PWR Licensiny-B

Enclosure:

As Stated cc w/ enclosure:

See next page PBD-6 A PBD-ADe Ag&th;cf JSto 12/ 85 12/g/85 8512200447 851205 PDR ADOCK 05000346 P PDR

Mr. J. Williams Toledo Edison Company Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Unit No. 1 cc:

Donald H. Hauser, Esq. Ohio Department of Health The Cleveland Electric ATTN: Radiological Health Illuminating Company Program Director P. O. Box 5000 Cleveland, Ohio 44101 P. O. Box 118 Columbus, Ohio 43216 Mr. Robert F. Peters Attorney General Manager, Nuclear Licensing Toledo Edison Company Department of Attorney General Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue 30 East Broad Street Toledo, Ohio 43652 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Gerald Charnoff, Esq. Mr. James W. Harris, Director Shaw, Pittman, Potts Division of Power Generation and Trowbridge Ohio Department of Industrial Relations 1800 M Street, N.W. 2323 West 5th Avenue Washington, D.C. 20036 P. O. Box 825 Columbus, Ohio 43216 Paul M. Smart, Esq.

Fuller & Henry Mr. Harold Kohn, Staff Scientist Power Siting Commission 300 Madison Avenue P. O. Box 2088 361 East Broad Street Toledo, Ohio 43603 Columbus, Ohio 43216 Mr. Robert B. Borsum President, Board of Babcock & Wilcox Ottawa County Nuclear Power Generation Port Clinton, Ohio 43452 Division Suite 200, 7910 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 5503 N. State Route 2

, Oak Harbor, Ohio 43449 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137

= - . -

Enclosure DAVIS-BESSE RE0 VEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

1. Identify the existing improvement efforts which contribute significantly toward supporting enhanced maintenance and safe operation and hence, will be given greater emphasis and support. How will the greater emphasis and support be accomplished? (p. 34c)

2. Provide the station administrative procedure regarding improved engineering interface and support (p. 44)

3. Provide the newly written " Conduct of Maintenance" procedure, currently scheduled for implementation by 11/30/85 (p. 45)

4. a. Which administrative procedures considered crucial to the implementation of new programs or improvement of existing programs will be completed before startup? (Appendix III.2 p. e/24/5)

b. Who is responsible for determining which procedures are considered crucial? (Appendix III-2 p. e/24/5)

5. a. Which technical procedures necessary to support restart activities will be completed prior to startup? (p. e/24/6) b.

Who is responsible for determining which procedures are necessary fcr startup? (Appendix III.2 p. e/24/6)

6. Provide the controlling procedure for the preventive maintenance program, currently planned for implementation by 11/30/85 (Appendix III.2 p. e/24/9)

7. a. Provide a listing of MW0s on systems important to safety that will be outstanding at restart, and provide appropriate justification why completion before restart is not required.

b. Explain in more detail the criteria being used to determine MW0s to be completed prior to restart (Appendix III.2 p. e/24/11)

c. Who is the operations department representative and who comprises the Restart Committee, as it affects prioritization of MW0s?

(Appendix III.2 p. e/24/11)

d. Describe how you intend to close the backlog existing at restart considering the expected generation of additional MW0s following resumption of operations.

l l

f i

I j

1 l

8. In light of the fact that a formal training program for personnel performing maintenance on limitorque valve operations and personnel operating and analyzing date from M0 VATS test equipment is listed as a post-startup item, how is it being assured that personnel performing l such actions prior to startup have received adequate training?

9. Describe QA involvement with maintenance activities during the transition to the new maintenance program.

1 i

f t

L

~- - . . . . - . . . - . . . __