ML20138K890
| ML20138K890 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 10/25/1985 |
| From: | Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Opeka J NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8510310048 | |
| Download: ML20138K890 (4) | |
Text
..
Docket No.: 50-423 Mr. John F. Opeka Senior Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Operations Northeast Nuclear Energy Company P. O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270
Dear Mr. Opeka:
Subject:
Request for Additional Information for Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 3 Enclosed are requests for additional information which the staff requires to complete its evaluation of your application for an operating license for Millstone 3.
Please advise the staff of your schedule to provide responses to this information by November 1, 1985.
1 For further information or clarification, please contact the Licensing Project Manager, Elizabeth L. Doolittle at (301) 492-4911.
Sincerely, ORIgIxAL SIGaG:D 3r:
.I B. J. Youngblood, Chief Licensing Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated cc: See next page QP3TRIBUTIO)N-ket_ File EDoolittle (NRCPUR 0 ELD LPDR ACRS(16)
NSIC EJordan PRC System JPartlow LB#1 R/F BGrimes MRushbrook fp i
LB# :
LB '.
EDool tt e:kab
-BJY 1
ood 10/g /85 10//e J
8510310048 851025 PDR ADOCK O 3
0CT 2 5 1985 Mr. J. F. Opeka Millstone Nuclear Power Station Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Unit No. 3 CC' Gerald Garfield, Esq.
Ms. Jane Spector Day, Berry & Howard Federal Energy Regulatory Comission City Place 825 N. Capitol Street, NE Hartford, Connecticut 06103-3499 Room 8608C Washington, D.C.
20426 Mr. Maurice R. Scully, Executive Director Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative 268 Thomas Road Groton, Connecticut 06340 Robert W. Bishop, Esq.
Corporate Secretary Northeast Utilities Post Office Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141 Mr. T. Rebelowski Senior Resident Inspector Office U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Millstone III P. O. Box 615 Waterford, Connecticut 06385 Mr. Michael L. Jones, Manager Project Management Department Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company Post Office Box 426 Ludlow, Massachusetts 01056 Regional Administrator U. S. NRC, Region I 631 Park Avenue J
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Mr. Karl Abraham Public Affairs Office, Region I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 l
l
ENCLOSURE 630.0 Licensee Qualification Branch In a letter to B. J. Youngblood from John F. Opeka dated October 16, 1985, an outline of the training program for personnel who will be utilized as Shift Advisors (SA) at Millstone 3 was provided. Based on the staff's review of the elements contained in the SA training program, it was determined that the following information is needed to complete this review.
630.12 A resume of each shift advisor which highlights his previous operating experience.
630.13 A copy of the procedure which describes the duties and authority of the shift advisors and the working relationships between the advisors and the operating shift personnel.
630.14 A copy of the training program presented to the shift advisors to assure they have adequate knowledge of plant specific matters to properly perform their duties.
630.15 When availab'le, a copy of written examination (s) administered to the shift advisor and the results of the examinations (s).
630.16 When available, copies and notes of the oral / simulator evaluation administered to the shift advisors.
630.17 A description of the training program presented to the operating shift crews to assure that they understand the role of the shift advisors.
630.18 A statement regarding the medical qualification requirements for the shift advisors.
)
630.19 A description of the procedures that will be used to evaluate the performance of the shift advisors during plant start-up.
l
[
ENCLOSURE 440.0 Reactor Systems Branch 440.72 N-1 Loop Operation We request the applicant to review each A00 and PA to assure that all equipment and systems specifically required by Millstone 3 Technical Specifications to mitigate those events during Mode 1 and 2 would also be available and provide the same level of pro-tection for Modes 3 and 4.
Otherwise, provide additional infor-mation to show that the proposed N-1 loop technical specifications for Modes 3 and 4, would not allow the plant to operate in an unanalyzed condition and are consistent with the safety analyses.
e
_