|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217M8771999-10-25025 October 1999 Requests That Industry Studies on long-term Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Be Provided to R Dudley at Listed Mail Stop ML20217M4331999-10-19019 October 1999 Submits Rept 17, Requal Tracking Rept from Operator Tracking Sys. Rept Was Used by NRC to Schedule Requalification Exams for Operators & Record Requal Pass Dates ML20217F5841999-10-13013 October 1999 Requests Revocation of License OP-11038-1 for GE Kingsley. Individual Has Been Reassigned to Position within Naesco ML20217F5811999-10-13013 October 1999 Forwards Insp Data & Naesco Evaluation of a EDG Exhaust Insp Conducted on 990407.Insp Ensured That Unacceptable Wall Thinning Will Not Occur During 40-year Design Lifetime of Sys ML20217C7321999-10-0808 October 1999 Forwards Copy of Seabrook Station Videotape Entitled, Completion of Seal Barrier Installation. Videotape Documents Process of Selecting,Designing & Installing Seal Deterrent Barrier to Preclude Entrapment of Seals ML20217B8621999-10-0505 October 1999 Forwards Rev 28,change 1 to EPIP Er 1.1, Classification & Emergencies, Per 10CFR50.54(q).Rev to Procedure Does Not Decrease Effectiveness of Seabrook Station Radiological Emergency Plan ML20217B7471999-10-0101 October 1999 Provides Notification of Change in PCT of More than 50 F,Per Requirements of 10CFR50.46(a)(3)(i),(ii).Tabulation of Large Break LOCA PCT Margin Utilization Applicable to Seabrook Station,Encl ML20212J8271999-09-30030 September 1999 Informs of Completion of mid-cycle PPR of Seabrook Station. Staff Conducted Reviews for All Operating NPPs to Integrate Performance Info & to Plan for Insp Activities at Facility Over Next Six Months.Plant Issues Matrix & Insp Plan Encl ML20216J2381999-09-30030 September 1999 Responds to Re Enforcement Discretion for Nuclear Plants During Y2K Transition.Nrc Expects All Licensees to Operate Nuclear Facilities Safety IAW NRC Regulations & Requirements ML20216J2421999-09-30030 September 1999 Responds to Card Received in Aug 1999,providing Comments on NRC Interim Enforcement Policy Re Enforcement Discretion for Nuclear Plants During Y2K Transition.Informs That Naesc Reported Seabrook as Y2K Ready Prior to 990701 ML20216J2471999-09-30030 September 1999 Responds to Which Provided Comments on NRC Interim Enforcement Policy Re Enforcement Discretion for Nuclear Plants During Y2K Transition.Informs That Naesc Reported Seabrook as Y2K Ready Prior to 990701 ML20212K7921999-09-30030 September 1999 Confirms 990922 Telcon with J D'Antonio & T Grew Re Arrangements Made for NRC to Inspect Licensed Operator Requalification Program at Seabrook Facility ML20212J0301999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-443/99-10 on 990726-30 & 0809-13.No Violations Noted.Insp Discussed ML20212G5071999-09-21021 September 1999 Submits Complaint to NRC Re NRC Failure to Cite Seabrook Station NPP Operators for Failing to Periodically Calibrate & Establish Adequate Measures to Insure That Relay Equipment Met All Required Calibration Settings Prior to Installation ML20212C1881999-09-20020 September 1999 Ack Receipt of Which Raised Concerns Re NRC Enforcement Actions at Plant & Issuance of NCVs ML20212D1401999-09-17017 September 1999 Forwards SE Accepting Request to Use Proposed Alternative to Certain Weld Repair Requirements in ASME Boiling & Pressure Vessel Code ML20212B9511999-09-17017 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 396 for MG Sketchley,License SOP-10685, Along with Supporting Medical Exam Info.Nrc Form 396 Has Been Superceded by Revised Version Dtd 971222,which Was Previously Submitted to NRC on 990812.Encl Withheld ML20212C3621999-09-15015 September 1999 Forwards Rev 34 to Seabrook Station Radiological Emergency Plan & Rev 85 to Seabrook Station Emergency Response Manual, Per 10CFR50,App E & 10CFR50.4 ML20212B5021999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards Licensee Responses to EPA Questions Re Plant Seal Deterrent Barrier.Util Completed Installation of Subject Barriers on All Three Station Offshore Intake Structures on 990818.Barriers Will Preclude Entrapment of Seals ML20211Q8521999-09-0808 September 1999 Informs That Rl Couture,License SOP-11027,terminated Employment at Naesco on 990907.Revocation of License Requested ML20211N8781999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Response to 990820 RFI Re NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Exams ML20211J9291999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards mark-ups & Retypes of Proposed Conforming License Changes Required in Connection with Transfers Being Sought in 990615 Application of Montaup Electric Co & New England Power Co for Transfer of Licenses & Ownership Interests ML20211M3221999-09-0202 September 1999 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp of License NPF-86 & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty. Corrective Actions:Conducted Prompt Review of Layoff Decision to Determine Relevant Facts DD-99-10, Informs That Time Provided by NRC Regulation within Which Commission May Act to Review Director'S Decision (DD-99-10) Expired.Commission Declined Review & Decision Became Final on 990830.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 9909021999-09-0202 September 1999 Informs That Time Provided by NRC Regulation within Which Commission May Act to Review Director'S Decision (DD-99-10) Expired.Commission Declined Review & Decision Became Final on 990830.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990902 ML20211J8811999-09-0101 September 1999 Forwards Comments on Seabrook Station Review of Reactor Vessel Integrity Database (Rvid)(Version 2).Minor Discrepancies Were Noted.Proposed Changes Are Encl in Order to Correct Discrepancies ML20211J8411999-09-0101 September 1999 Forwards Updated NRC Form 396 for E Decosta,Nrc License OP-10655-1.Without Encl ML20211G9191999-08-27027 August 1999 Informs NRC That Name of New Company, Ref in Order Approving Application Re Corporate Merger Is Nstar Which Is Massachusetts Business Trust ML20211J0401999-08-26026 August 1999 Responds to 990819 Request,On Behalf of Gr Pageau & Williams Power Corp,For Addl Time in Which to Reply to Nov,Issued on 990803.Response Due to NRC by 991008 ML20211H0651999-08-25025 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-443/99-05 on 990621-0801.One Violation Re Failure to Include Multiple Components within Scope of ISI Test Program Was Identified & Being Treated as NCV, Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20211G7761999-08-24024 August 1999 Expresses Great Concern Re Lack of Enforcement Actions Against Seabrook Station Despite Citations NRC Has Issued for Violations of Seabrook Operating License ML20211J2171999-08-23023 August 1999 Expresses Disappointment with Lack of Enforcement Action Against Seabrook Station Despite Repeated Safety Violations ML20211J4971999-08-21021 August 1999 Submits Comments Re Violations Cited in Early Mar & 990509 Insps ML20211H8361999-08-19019 August 1999 Submits Concerns Re Violations at Seabrook Station ML20211F2681999-08-19019 August 1999 Discusses Former Chairman Jackson & 990602 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Re Findings of Ofc of Investigations Involving Allegations Raised by Contract Electrician.Determined That Allegations Not Supported ML20211J3241999-08-15015 August 1999 Expresses Disappointment in Apparent Failure of NRC to Cite Seabrook Station NPP for Recent Violations of Safety Regulations Uncovered During Recent Insps in Mar & May ML20211J1831999-08-15015 August 1999 Submits Concerns Over Serious Deficiencies at Seabrook Station That NRC Has Declined to Take Enforcement Actions Against ML20210T1601999-08-13013 August 1999 Informs That as Result of Staff Review of Licensee Responses to GL 92-01,rev,supp1 1, Reactor Vessel Structural Integrity, NRC Revised Info in Reactor Vessel Integrity Database & Is Releasing It as Rvid Version 2 ML20211J2071999-08-13013 August 1999 Expresses Concerns Re Violations Occurring Recently at Seabrook Nuclear Power Station.Requests Effort to See That Measures Taken to Stop Flagrant,Continuing Violations That Hold Danger to Workers & Community ML20210S9611999-08-13013 August 1999 Informs That NRC Received Encl Ltr from Pb Johnston Expressing Concern About Certain Impacts on Shareholders of New England Electric Sys with Respect to Nees Proposed Merger with Natl Grid Group ML20210S9511999-08-13013 August 1999 Responds to to Collins Expressing Concerns with Certain Terms of Proposed Merger Between New England Electric Sys & National Grid Group.Nrc Has No Authority to Interject Itself in Nees Merger with National Grid Group ML20210S2001999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards NRC Forms 398 & 396 in Support of Applications for Renewal of Operator Licenses for Individuals Listed Below. Without Encls ML20210R8401999-08-11011 August 1999 Forwards Response to NRC Second RAI Re GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of SR Power-Operated Gate Valves ML20210S7331999-08-11011 August 1999 Submits Third Suppl to 980423 Application to Renew NPDES Permit NH0020338 for Seabrook Station.Suppl Provides Addl Info on Input Streams & Requests Increased Permit Limit for Chemical Used in Makeup Water Treatment Sys ML20210R9581999-08-11011 August 1999 Forwards ISI Exam Rept of Seabrook Station, for RFO 6, Period 3,for Insps Conducted Prior to & During Sixth Refueling Outage Concluded on 990510 ML20210Q7441999-08-11011 August 1999 Forwards Order Approving Indirect Transfer of Control of Canal Interest in Seabrook Station Unit 1 as Requested in Application & SER ML20210R7931999-08-10010 August 1999 Forwards Cycle 7 Startup Rept for Seabrook Station, IAW Requirements of TS 6.8.1.1 ML20210N9421999-08-0505 August 1999 Informs That North Atlantic Suggests Listed Revisions to 990730 Draft Revisions to Committee Rept & Order.Further Revs Consistent with What North Atlantic Proposed at 990608 Hearing ML20210N5721999-08-0303 August 1999 Discusses Investigations Rept 1-98-005 Conducted by OI at Naesco,Seabrook Station & Forwards NOV & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty - $55,000.Violation Re Failure to Promptly Correct Incorrectly Terminated Cables of Control Bldg Air ML20210P3361999-08-0303 August 1999 Discusses Investigation Rept 1-98-005 Conducted by Region I OI at Naesco,Seabrook Station & Forwards Nov.Violations Re Electrical Wiring in Control Panel for Control Bldg Air Conditioning Sys ML20210P3161999-08-0303 August 1999 Discusses Investigation Rept 1-98-005,conducted Between 980129 & 0527 at Seabrook Station & Forwards Nov.Violation Re Discrimination of Williams Power Corp,Contractor of Naesco,Against Electrician for Raising Safety Issues 1999-09-08
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20217F5841999-10-13013 October 1999 Requests Revocation of License OP-11038-1 for GE Kingsley. Individual Has Been Reassigned to Position within Naesco ML20217F5811999-10-13013 October 1999 Forwards Insp Data & Naesco Evaluation of a EDG Exhaust Insp Conducted on 990407.Insp Ensured That Unacceptable Wall Thinning Will Not Occur During 40-year Design Lifetime of Sys ML20217B8621999-10-0505 October 1999 Forwards Rev 28,change 1 to EPIP Er 1.1, Classification & Emergencies, Per 10CFR50.54(q).Rev to Procedure Does Not Decrease Effectiveness of Seabrook Station Radiological Emergency Plan ML20217B7471999-10-0101 October 1999 Provides Notification of Change in PCT of More than 50 F,Per Requirements of 10CFR50.46(a)(3)(i),(ii).Tabulation of Large Break LOCA PCT Margin Utilization Applicable to Seabrook Station,Encl ML20212G5071999-09-21021 September 1999 Submits Complaint to NRC Re NRC Failure to Cite Seabrook Station NPP Operators for Failing to Periodically Calibrate & Establish Adequate Measures to Insure That Relay Equipment Met All Required Calibration Settings Prior to Installation ML20212B9511999-09-17017 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 396 for MG Sketchley,License SOP-10685, Along with Supporting Medical Exam Info.Nrc Form 396 Has Been Superceded by Revised Version Dtd 971222,which Was Previously Submitted to NRC on 990812.Encl Withheld ML20212C3621999-09-15015 September 1999 Forwards Rev 34 to Seabrook Station Radiological Emergency Plan & Rev 85 to Seabrook Station Emergency Response Manual, Per 10CFR50,App E & 10CFR50.4 ML20211Q8521999-09-0808 September 1999 Informs That Rl Couture,License SOP-11027,terminated Employment at Naesco on 990907.Revocation of License Requested ML20211N8781999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Response to 990820 RFI Re NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Exams ML20211J9291999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards mark-ups & Retypes of Proposed Conforming License Changes Required in Connection with Transfers Being Sought in 990615 Application of Montaup Electric Co & New England Power Co for Transfer of Licenses & Ownership Interests ML20211M3221999-09-0202 September 1999 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp of License NPF-86 & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty. Corrective Actions:Conducted Prompt Review of Layoff Decision to Determine Relevant Facts ML20211J8411999-09-0101 September 1999 Forwards Updated NRC Form 396 for E Decosta,Nrc License OP-10655-1.Without Encl ML20211J8811999-09-0101 September 1999 Forwards Comments on Seabrook Station Review of Reactor Vessel Integrity Database (Rvid)(Version 2).Minor Discrepancies Were Noted.Proposed Changes Are Encl in Order to Correct Discrepancies ML20211G9191999-08-27027 August 1999 Informs NRC That Name of New Company, Ref in Order Approving Application Re Corporate Merger Is Nstar Which Is Massachusetts Business Trust ML20211G7761999-08-24024 August 1999 Expresses Great Concern Re Lack of Enforcement Actions Against Seabrook Station Despite Citations NRC Has Issued for Violations of Seabrook Operating License ML20211J2171999-08-23023 August 1999 Expresses Disappointment with Lack of Enforcement Action Against Seabrook Station Despite Repeated Safety Violations ML20211J4971999-08-21021 August 1999 Submits Comments Re Violations Cited in Early Mar & 990509 Insps ML20211H8361999-08-19019 August 1999 Submits Concerns Re Violations at Seabrook Station ML20211J3241999-08-15015 August 1999 Expresses Disappointment in Apparent Failure of NRC to Cite Seabrook Station NPP for Recent Violations of Safety Regulations Uncovered During Recent Insps in Mar & May ML20211J1831999-08-15015 August 1999 Submits Concerns Over Serious Deficiencies at Seabrook Station That NRC Has Declined to Take Enforcement Actions Against ML20211J2071999-08-13013 August 1999 Expresses Concerns Re Violations Occurring Recently at Seabrook Nuclear Power Station.Requests Effort to See That Measures Taken to Stop Flagrant,Continuing Violations That Hold Danger to Workers & Community ML20210S2001999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards NRC Forms 398 & 396 in Support of Applications for Renewal of Operator Licenses for Individuals Listed Below. Without Encls ML20210R8401999-08-11011 August 1999 Forwards Response to NRC Second RAI Re GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of SR Power-Operated Gate Valves ML20210R9581999-08-11011 August 1999 Forwards ISI Exam Rept of Seabrook Station, for RFO 6, Period 3,for Insps Conducted Prior to & During Sixth Refueling Outage Concluded on 990510 ML20210R7931999-08-10010 August 1999 Forwards Cycle 7 Startup Rept for Seabrook Station, IAW Requirements of TS 6.8.1.1 ML20210K3281999-07-30030 July 1999 Forwards Response to NRC RAI Re License Amend Request 98-17. North Atlantic Concurs with Staff That Bases Should State That Maintaining ECCS Piping Full of Water from RWST to Reactor Coolant Sys Ensures Sys Will Perform Properly ML20210H8991999-07-27027 July 1999 Forwards Tabulation of Current LBLOCA & SBLOCA Peak Clad Temp Margin Utilization Tables Applicable to Seabrook Station ML20210H0921999-07-27027 July 1999 Forwards Naesc Semi-Annual Fitness-for-Duty Rept,Jan-June 1999, Per 10CFR26.71(d).Rept Includes Data from 990101- 0610 ML20210S9911999-07-18018 July 1999 Requests NRC Intervene for All Shareholders of New England Electric System & to Help with Merger with National Grid Group & That NRC Petition Security & Exchange Commission to Investigate Matter Relative to No Shareholder Options ML20210A2521999-07-15015 July 1999 Forwards Rev 33 to Seabrook Station Radiological Emergency Plan & Rev 84 to Seabrook Station Emergency Response Manual ML20209J0601999-07-14014 July 1999 Forwards Rev 11 to Vols 1-10 of State of Nh Radiological Emergency Response Plan & Vols 11-50 to Town Radiological Emergency Response Plans,In Support of Vermont Yankee & Seabrook Station.Vols 17-19 of Were Not Included ML20209G1351999-07-0909 July 1999 Forwards Relief Request Re Repair Welding on SA-351 Matl to Be Installed in Seabrook Station SW Pumps & SW Cooling Tower Pumps ML20209D2871999-07-0606 July 1999 Submits Response to NRC AL 99-02,re Numerical Estimate of Licensing Actions Expected to Be Submitted in Fy 2000 & 2001.Schedule Does Not Include Activities Which Meet AL Definition of Complex Review ML20209C9021999-06-30030 June 1999 Provides Revised Distribution List for Seabrook Station Correspondence to Reflect Current Organization ML20196G2391999-06-23023 June 1999 Responds to GL 98-01,Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Y2K Readiness Disclosure for Plant Encl ML20196G3381999-06-23023 June 1999 Forwards LAR 99-19 for License NPF-86,increasing AOT for Cracs from 30 Days to 60 Days on One Time Basis for Each Train to Facilitate on-line Implementation of Design Enhancements During Current Operating Cycle ML20195J0981999-06-17017 June 1999 Forwards Responses to Questions Posed in Re Application of New England Power Co for Transfer of Control of Licenses NPF-49 & NPF-86.Copy of 1998 Schedule 13G, Included,As Requested ML20196D0561999-06-16016 June 1999 Forwards Certified Copy of Endorsements 77 & 78 to Nelia to Policy NF-0296 ML20195H1741999-06-15015 June 1999 Forwards Original & Copy of Request for Approval of Certain Indirect & Direct Transfer of License & Ownership Interests of Montaup Electric Co (Montaup) with Respect to Nuclear Facilities Described as Listed ML20195J1221999-06-15015 June 1999 Forwards Addl Clarifying Info to Suppl Info Provided at 990602 Predecisional Enforcement Conference at Region I. Proprietary Declarations by Util Employees to Correct Inaccuracies Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20210K4971999-06-15015 June 1999 Forwards Copy of Ltr from Concerned Constitutent AC Menninger from Franconia,Nh to Senator Smith Re Seabrook Nuclear Power Station Y2K Readiness ML20195E9731999-06-0707 June 1999 Forwards Rev 32 to Seabrook Station Radiological Emergency Plan & Rev 83 to Emergency Response Manual ML20206T4201999-05-20020 May 1999 Forwards Certified Copies of Resolution Adopted by Shareholders of National Grid Group Approving Acquisition of New England Electric Sys & Vote of New England Electric Sys Shareholders Approving Merger with National Grid Group ML20196L2001999-05-0707 May 1999 Forwards Rev 01-07-00 to RE-21, Cycle 7 COLR, Per TS 6.8.1.6.c ML20206K4301999-05-0707 May 1999 Forwards Copy of Corrective Order of Notice by State of Nh Nuclear Decommissioning Financing Committee ML20206J3321999-05-0505 May 1999 Forwards Tabulation of Number of Tubes Plugged in Each of Two SGs Inspected During Sixth Isi,Per Plant TS SR 4.4.5.5a. Sixth ISI Was Completed on 990420 ML20206J3341999-05-0505 May 1999 Informs That on 990501,ISO New England & New England Power Pool Implemented Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market. Summary of Util Action as Result of Implementation of Subject Market,Encl ML20206J2801999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards 1998 Annual Financial Repts for CT Light & Power Co,Western Ma Electric Co,Public Svc Co of Nh,North Atlantic Energy Corp,Northeast Nuclear Energy Co & North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp,License Holders ML20206G4371999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards 1998 Annual Environ Operating Rept for Seabrook Station.Encl Rept Is Summary of Implementation of EPP for Period of Jan-Dec 1998 ML20206H4801999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards 1998 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Seabrook Station. Listed Info Provided in Encls 1999-09-08
[Table view] Category:UTILITY TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20059K5221990-09-14014 September 1990 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-443/90-15.Corrective Actions:Procedure ON1090.04 Revised to Require That Whenever Containment Entry Made,Entry Logged in Action Statement Status Log ML20059K5951990-09-14014 September 1990 Forwards Endorsement 29 to Nelia Policy NF-296,Endorsement 22 to Maelu Policy MF-127,Endorsement 9 to Nelia Policy N-109 & Maelu Policy M-109 ML20059K1051990-09-13013 September 1990 Advises of 1990 Biennial Exercise Meeting Scheduled for 900928 at Facility to Discuss Comments Re objectives/extent- of-play Submittal & Present Operational & Radiological Details of Scenario.Suggested Agenda Encl ML20059D6971990-08-30030 August 1990 Forwards 10CFR50.59 Quarterly Rept for Apr-June 1990 ML20064A4001990-08-21021 August 1990 Forwards, New Hampshire Yankee Fitness-For-Duty Semiannual Rept,900103-0630 ML20059B0231990-08-21021 August 1990 Forwards Addl Info Re Topics Discussed on 900816 Concerning Licensees Response to Intervenors Emergency Motion to Reopen Record on Adequacy of Staffing of New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan & Immediate Shutdown ML17348B4921990-08-15015 August 1990 Forwards Revised Evacuation Time Estimates Incorporating Vehicles Hidden from Aerial Observation,Per ALAB-932 & ASLB Memorandum & Order LBP-90-20.Revised Estimates Will Be Incorporated Into Radiological Emergency Response Plan ML20059A3051990-08-14014 August 1990 Informs of Closing on United Illuminating Co Sale & Leaseback Transaction on 900809,per Amend 1 to License. Transaction Conforms to Description in Amend Application, ,as Supplemented by 900426 & 0606 Ltrs ML20058L9571990-08-0303 August 1990 Forwards Rev 1 to Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves,Adding Cold Shutdown Justification ML20058M2211990-08-0303 August 1990 Notifies of Change in Listed Licensed Operator Position. MR Breault Will Continue to Maintain Senior Operator License in New Position Until 900917 ML20055J4751990-07-26026 July 1990 Confirms That Util Completed Installation & Testing of Facility ATWS Mitigation Sys,Per 890706 Commitment ML20055J0271990-07-24024 July 1990 Forwards Rev 5 to Facility Security Training & Qualification Plan.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20055H5831990-07-20020 July 1990 Forwards Rev 11 to Physical Security Plan.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20044B1861990-07-10010 July 1990 Forwards Rev 1.B to Spmc,App H,New Hampshire Yankee Offsite Response Communications Directory & Spmc,App M,New Hampshire Yankee Offsite Response Emergency Resource Manual. ML20044A6631990-06-25025 June 1990 Responds to NRC 900524 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-443/90-10.Corrective Actions:Maint Group Instruction Issued Describing Valve Verification When Valves Not Covered by Procedure & Procedures Written Re Monitoring Skids ML20044A3741990-06-22022 June 1990 Notifies That United Illuminating Co Received Approval of State of CT Dept of Public Util Control of Sale & Leaseback of Facility ML20043H1321990-06-18018 June 1990 Forwards New Hampshire Yankee Power Ascension Assessment Self-Assessment Team Phase 2 50% Power Plateau. ML20043G4761990-06-11011 June 1990 Lists Changes in Status of Licensed Operator Positions at Facility,Per 10CFR50.74 ML20043F5791990-06-0808 June 1990 Requests That Meeting W/Nrc & Westinghouse Be Held During Wk of 900624 to Further Discuss Intended Cycle 2 Fuel Design Features & Fuel Mgt Strategies ML20043E9811990-06-0606 June 1990 Forwards Info on Owner Participation & Owner Trustee in United Illuminating Co Sale/Leaseback Transaction, Consisting of Sec Form 10K & Citicorp 1989 Annual Rept. ML20043E5371990-06-0606 June 1990 Responds to NRC 900508 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-443/90-08.Corrective Actions:Signs Will Be Placed on Containment Hatches to Remind Personnel That Retest Required After Containment Hatch Use & to Notify Control Room ML20043C5251990-05-31031 May 1990 Responds to NRC Bulletin 88-010,Suppl 1, Nonconforming Molded Case Circuit Breakers. Util Verified That Certificates of Conformance Issued by Telemecanique for All 305 Telemecanique-supplied Molded Case Circuit Breakers ML20043B7291990-05-24024 May 1990 Forwards Employee Allegation Resolution Program Radio Communication Transcript Review. Transmissions Did Not Contain Issues of Detrimental Safety Significance to Public or Plant Personnel ML20043C1031990-05-23023 May 1990 Forwards Revs 53 & 54 to Production Emergency Response Manual. ML20043F7071990-05-18018 May 1990 Forwards Addl Info Re Status of Licensee Actions in Response to INPO Evaluation Repts of Facility for 1983-1989,including Update of Response to INPO Rept of 1983 Const Project Evaluation & Evaluation of Seabrook Station Const Project. ML20042G2511990-05-0808 May 1990 Forwards Estimates of Time Impact on Facility Personnel Re Topics Identified in Generic Ltr 90-01.Info Presented in Format of Completed Questionnaire Sheets ML20042G6501990-05-0808 May 1990 Forwards Rev 10 to Physical Security Plan.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20042F7471990-05-0404 May 1990 Informs of 900430 Election of Le Maglathlin to Replace Jc Duffett as President & Chief Executive Officer ML20042E8371990-04-30030 April 1990 Forwards Annual Environ Operating Rept 1989, Seabrook Environ Studies 1988,Characterization of Baseline Conditions in Hampton-Seabrook Area,1975-1988,Preoperational Study for Seabrook Station & Seabrook Environ Studies... Rept. ML20012E9991990-03-30030 March 1990 Suppls Info to 890417 Submittal on Station Blackout Rule (10CFR50.63).Instrumentation Required to Cope W/Station Blackout Is safety-related & Evaluated for Operability at Elevated Temps ML20012E9881990-03-30030 March 1990 Forwards marked-up FSAR Section 13.2 (Training) Descriptive Enhancements,Per 891113 Commitment.Rev Will Be Included in 900415 FSAR ML20042D8251990-03-30030 March 1990 Requests NRC Participation at 900405 Working Session to Discuss Objectives & Extent of Play for 1990 Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise on 901213.Encl Withheld ML20012F0341990-03-30030 March 1990 Forwards Suppl to, Semiannual Radioactive Release Rept Initial Plant Startup Through Fourth Quarter 1989, Consisting of Dose Calculations ML20012E8751990-03-29029 March 1990 Advises That Replacement of Rosemount Transmitter from High Failure Fraction Mfg Lot Completed on 900314,per 900312 Commitment ML20012D9181990-03-21021 March 1990 Forwards Executed Amend 4 to Indemnity Agreement B-106 & Opinion Ltr from Ropes & Gray Re Signature Authority of Util as Agent for Joint Owners of Plant ML20012D9681990-03-20020 March 1990 Discusses Steam Generator Overfill Protection,Per Generic Ltr 89-19 & USI A-47, Safety Implications of Control Sys in LWR Nuclear Power Plants. Steam Generator Overfill Protection at Plant Meets Recommendations of Generic Ltr ML19324G6791990-03-15015 March 1990 Provides Info in Response to late-filed Allegations,Per 900314 Telcon ML20012B8601990-03-14014 March 1990 Clarifies 900312 Supplemental Response to Proposed Draft NRC Bulletin on Loss of Fill Oil in Rosemount Transmitters. If More Frequent Calibr Required,Transmitter Will Be Time Response Tested to Operability Acceptance Criteria ML20012B8351990-03-13013 March 1990 Notifies That Senior Operator License No Longer Required for PD Mccabe & License Considered Expired ML20012B8371990-03-13013 March 1990 Clarifies Supplemental Response to Proposed Draft NRC Bulletin on Loss of Fill Oil in Rosemount Transmitters,Per 900313 Telcon.Operability Acceptance Test Will Be Performed ML20012B6191990-03-12012 March 1990 Advises That Licensee Intends to Submit FSAR Amend 63 by 900415 Instead of 900315 ML20012B4901990-03-0808 March 1990 Forwards Corrected Response Re Allegation by Employees Legal Project Concerning Reactor Coolant Pump Support Leg Anchor Bolts ML20012B1191990-03-0707 March 1990 Responds to NRC 900205 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-443/89-17.Corrective Actions:Conduit Seals Installed on Required Solenoids & Operability Completed on 900204 ML20012C2521990-03-0606 March 1990 Documents Info Provided in Telcon Re Relief & Safety Valve Testing ML20012B3631990-03-0202 March 1990 Forwards Secondary Chemistry Annual Rept, for 1989.Rept Summarizes & Evaluates 1989 Condensate,Feedwater & Steam Generator Water Chemistry Operating Experience & Repts Total Time Secondary Water Chemistry Parameters Out of Spec ML20012A1581990-03-0101 March 1990 Submits Annual Rept of Challenges to Pressurizer PORVs & Safety Valves for Initial Criticality Period Through 891231 ML20012A1861990-03-0101 March 1990 Forwards Seabrook Station 10CFR50.59 Safety Evaluation Quarterly Rept,Oct-Dec 1989. Power Supply Breakers for Containment Lighting Panel XL4 Replaced & Smoke Detector Insp Frequency Changed to at Least Semiannually ML20012A1011990-02-26026 February 1990 Responds to Info Notice 89-045, Metalclad Low-Voltage Power Circuit Breakers Refurbished W/Substandard Parts. One molded-case Circuit Breaker Purchased from Satin American in Nov 1989 for Use in Plant Simulator ML20006F5401990-02-23023 February 1990 Submits Addl Info Re Util Maint Program,Per NRC 900221 Telcon Request.Util Maint Program Includes Preventive, Predictive & Corrective Maint as Well as Implementation of Design Enhancements ML20006G1571990-02-21021 February 1990 Forwards Renewal Application for NPDES Permit NH0020338,per App B to License NPF-67.State of Nh EPA Determined That Requested Changes to Discharges 001,022,023 & 024 Will Not Jeopardize Environ When Full Power Operation Begins 1990-09-14
[Table view] |
Text
-
1
+ -
kf7DCbhttin$ $
... 1 p' 9 j George S. Thomas a Vice PreskMnf Nuctoor P cduenco l Put2c Service of New Hampshire New Hampshiro Yankee Division October 9, 1985 Mr. Robert M. Keller, Chief Projects Branch No. I Division of Reactor Projects U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Subj ect : Review of NRC Written Exam
Dear Mr. Keller:
During the cold licensing exams administered at Seabrook Station during the week of September 30 through October 4, the Training Center staff was provided the opportunity to review the written exam.
As a result of this review, it is requested that question 7.4 he eliminated from the exam. The basis for this request is described below.
Seabrook Station has impicmented site specific procedures adapted f rom the Emergency Response Guidelines (ERGS) developed by^the Westinghouse owners Group (WOG). Question 7.4 testa cach candidate's knowledge of entry level conditions for a Functional Restoration (FR) procedure. Entry to procedure FRZ.3 is made on a yellow path f rom a Critical Safety Function (CSF) status tree. The priority assigned the color yellow calls for " eventual operator action."
The integration of the CSF status trees and the ERGS require the operator to begin monitoring critical safety functions only af ter bcIng directed to do so from either E-0, Reactor Trip or Safety Injection or ECA-0.0 Loss of All AC Power. Direct entry to a functional testoration procedure is never made.
Memorizing entry conditions to procedures other than E-0 or ECA 0.0 is unnecessary and is discouraged by the ERG philosophy and our operator t ra in ing program.
Attached is mater tal supporting our position and request. This material was extracted from the Users Guide for the ERG set provided by the West inghouse Owners Group.
0512170529 031210 3 PDit ADOCK 0500 0
P O liox 300
Mr. Robert M. Keller October 9, 1985 Page 2-Should you have any questions concerning'this information, please contact Mr. Peter M. Richardson, Seabrook Training Center Manager, 'at (603) 474-9521,.
extension 2605.
Very truly yours, l e S. Thomas CST /cj b Attachments d
t e
t 6
_= ._ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _
t(-
TABLE 4 STATU3 TREE COLOR LEGEND COLOR CODE Definition Green The critical safety function is satisfied - no operator action is called for.
Yellow The critical safety function is not fully satisfied - operator action may eventually be needed.
Orange The critical safety function is under severe challenge prompt operator action is necessary.
Red The critical safety function is in jeopardy -
immediate operator action is required.
(
c .
i=
Monitoring may be terminated af ter the Reactor Protection System and Engi-neered Safeguards System are both restored to operable status (SI reset.and
( trip breakers closed). At this point, the operator should no longer be using the ERPs.
A YELLOW terminus does not' require immediate operator attention.
Frequently it is indicative of an off normal i and/or temporary . condition which will be restored to normal status by actions already in progress. In other cases where RED or ORANGE termini are possible, the YELLOW status might provide an early indication of a problem developing. Following' FRP implementa tion, a YELLOW might indicate a residual off-aormal condition.
The operator is allowed to decide whether or not ito implement any YELLOW condition FRP. \
Tree monitoring can be done automatically by compu'ter; however, the opera-tor should verify proper automatic status monitoring at least once and as S early as possible. This is accomplished by comparing status tree indica-tions with hard wired MCB indicators for appropriate ' parameters. - ,
- 5. . EXAMPLE OF STATUS TREE USAGE
- 1 The actu'al process of working through the trees will be illustrated by exa-mining the first (Suberiticality) < status tree. The user enters die tree,at the lef t-hand arrow and is asked if neutron flux (NIS channels) indicatiba is less than 5%. The possible answers are either "yes" or "no". If indi- ,
cated power. is greater than 57.,, then the appropriate answer is "no", so the user would follow , the "no" path directly to the terminus and determine tha t: '
(
i e the response, phiority is RED (immediate response required) ,
5 e the appropriate Function Restoration ?rocedure is FR-S.I.
According to the Rules of Priority, the operator should suspend whichever ORP is bein'g performed and immediately initiate the actions in procedure FR-S.L. Monitoring of the Status . Trees may continue for information pur-poses, but by Rules of Priority, no other higher priority condition, can exist. When the actions required by FR-S.1 are complete, the ope'ra tor . is, .
directed to "Re turn to Procedure and Step in Effect". This allows recove'ry actions to continue exactly where they were suspended when the RED priority was recognized. This also signals continued monitoring of status trees.
In this case, the user and/or operator would know, because of the FR-S.l actions and checks, tha t the subcriticality tree would have no status more severe than YELLOW.
4 If indicated power is less than 5%, then the first question block is answered with a "yes" and the user would follow the "yes" pa th to the.,next question, block. '
In this second block, the user is asked whether the Intermediate Rango' S tartup ' Rate is zero or negative. If the indicated rate is positive, then the userl would follow the "no" response path directly to a terminus and determine tha t:
e .
}
9_
l +
)
/
I
_ .. - - - - - ,A-
n, p .
- 6. CONTROL ROOM USAGE OF THE ERG NETWORK While the previous sections. discussed the separate usage of an individual
'~
guideline and evaluation of Status Trees, this section presents the intended overall usage of the entire ERG network.
Entry into the Emergency Response Guideline se*. is limited to two specific conditions:
o If at any time a reactor trip or safety injection occurs or is required, the operator will enter guideline E-0, REACTOR TRIP OR SAFETY INJECTION.
o If at any time a complete loss of power on the ac emergency busses takes place, the operator will enter. guideline ECA-0.0, LOSS OF ALL AC POWER. This includes any time during the performa~nce _of any other ERG. -
The entry into E-0 is expected to be the one more frequently used, so it is i described first:
I The. operator enters at Step 1 and proceeds through E-0, following the rules of guideline usage as described above, with two possible outcomes:
c o He remains in E-0 and is directed by an action step to begin monitoring the Status Trees, or x'
o He transfers to some other guideline, at which point he begins to monitor the Status Trees.
, ' Monitoring of the Status Tre'es takes place in accordance with its own rules of usage, in parallel with the recovery actions being performed by the operator.
The monitoring may be done directly by one of the operators in the control room, by some other member of the shift assigned to the control room, or by a dedicated computer routine. The only requirement of the monitoring function is a
USERS GUIDE 16 September 1, 1983 6689B:1 ga
.[* Mesitarirg' may be terminated af tsr ths Rocctor Protectics Systea cad Engi-
, noorsd Sofcguardo Systea era both ractorsd to oporchio status (SI rasat cod
- trip breakers closed).. At this point, the operator should no longer be using the ERPs.
AYg terminus doesy require immediate operator attention.
Frequently it is indicative of, an off-normal &nd/or temporary condition
~
which will be restored to normal status by actions already in progress. In other cases where RED or ORANGE termini are possible, the YELLOW status might provide an early indication of a problem developing. Following FRP.
implementation, a YELLOW might indicate a residual off-normal condition.
The operator is allowed to decide whether or not to implement any YELLOW condition FRP.
Tree monitoring can be done automatically by computer; however, the opera-tor should verify proper automatic status monitoring at least once and as early as possible. This is secomplished by comparing status tree indica-tions with hard wired NCB indicators for app opriate parameters.
- 5. EXAMPLE OF STATUS TREE USAGE
' The actual proces - p . working through the -trees will be illustrated by exa-mining the first (24acriticality) status tree. The user enters the tree at the lef t3 hand arrow and is asked if neutron flux (NIS channels) indication is less chan 5%. The possible answers are either "yes" or "no". If indi-cated power is greater than 5%, tren the appropriate answer is "no", so the user would follow the "no" path directly to the terminus and determine tha t:
t e the reopnnse priority is RED (immediate response required) e the appropriate ~ Function Restoration Procedure is FR-S.I.
According to the Rules of Priority, the operator should suspend whichever ORP is being performed and. immediately initiate the actions in procedure FR-S.L. Monitoring of the Status Trees may continue for information pur-poses, but by, Rules of Priority, no other higher priority _ condition can exist. When - the actions required by FR-S.L are complete, the operator is directed to Re turn to Procedure and S tep in Eff ect". This allows recovery actions to continue exactly where they were suspended when the RED priority was recognized. This also signals continued monitoring of status trees.
i In this case, the user and/or operator would knce, because of the FR-S.l j actions and checks, tha t the subcriticality tree would have no status more severe than YELLOW.
If indicated power is less than 5%, then the first question block is answered with a "yes" and the user would follow the "yes" path to the next question block.
In this second block, the user is asked whether the Intermediate Range S tartup Rate is zero or negative. 'If the indicated ra te is positive, then
- the ' user would follow the "no" response path directly to a terminus and determine tha t
A r t ier '94^5 hw alc h. &
d FAP sb
g
- 6. CONTROL ROOM USAGE OF THE ERG NETWORK While the previous sections discussed the separate usage of an individual guideline and evaluation of Status Trees, this section. presents the intended overall usage of the entire ERG network.
Entry into the Emergency Response Guideline set is limited to two specific conditions:
o If at any time a reactor trip or safety injection occurs or is required, the operator will enter guideline E-0, REACTOR TRIP OR SAFETY INJECTION.
o If at any time a complete loss of power on the ac emergency busses takes place, the operator will enter guideline ECA-0.0, LOSS OF ALL AC POWER. This includes any time during the performance of any other ERG.
The entry into E-0 is expected to be the one more frequently used, so it is described first:
The operator enters at Step 1 and proceeds through E-0, following the rules of guideline usage as described above, with two possible outcomes: '
o He remains in E-0 and is directed by an action step to begin monitoring the Status Trees, or o He transfers to some other guideline, at which point he begins to monitor the Status Trees.
Monitoring of the Status Tre~es takes place in accordance with its own rules of usage, in parallel with the recovery actions being performed by the operator.
The monitoring may be done directly by one of the operators in the control room,'by some other member of the shift assigned to the control room, or by a dedicated computer routine. The only requirement of the monitoring function is USERS GUIDE 16 September 1, 1983 6689B:1
r o'
s' ATTACHMENT 2 Facility Comments and Resolutions Question Comment 5.3b Typo - change 231 to tau.
5.7 Half lives were not asked for in the question and will
.not be required in the answer.
5.12 . Natural circulation indications in ES-0.1 Appendix A may be'used since they are essentially equivalent to those in the answer key.
6.2 According to UEC Dwg. 9763-M-310882-SHA05b, the electrical supply bus 86 relay is NOT a part of the-RCP starting interlock. It is, therefore, not a required part of the correct answer.
6.4 In part 4, change " BIT" to "SI Flow Path" since the BIT has been removed.
6.5 Answer key typo: change _ point value to 2.0 for entire question and 0.4 for each part of part b.
6.12 According to UEC Dwg. 9763-M-503492, only three EDG trips correctly answer the question: Mechanical overspeed, generator differential (primarily lockout),
and 2/3 low Lube oil pressure.
6.14a According to UEC Dwg. 9763-M-503398, the CCP mini-flow recirc valves reopen on low flow after an SI signal. This is the correct response to part a.
7.4 Facility comment was that this question requires memorizing the yellow path entry condition to FR-Z.3 Responseoto High Containment Radiation, and that such memorization is not required by the guidance given for the use of the Emergency Response Guidelines (ERG). This procedure would always be entered by direction from another ERG or from a Critical Safety Function (CSF). status tree. Based on the Westinghouse Owners' Group (WOG) Executive Summary Users' Guide section, which is the source of the above guidance, the question will be deleted from the exam. However, two points should be made.
y: -
.o-3b' 2
- 1) NUREG 1122,.Knowledges and Abilities Catalog for Nuclear Power Plant Operators: Pressurized Water Reactors, gives a^high importance rating to generic ability #10 - Ability ,to recognize abnormal. indica--
tions for_ system operating parameters, which are entry-level conditions for emergency and abnormal operating procedures.
Future questions can and will be based on this ability, including the ERG's where appropriate, i.e. red path. conditions, which are characterized as requiring immediate operator action by-the WOG User's Guide.
- 2) In accordance with NUREG 1021 Operator Licensing Examiner Standards Section 402.A.3, candidates must be able to describe conceptually the objectives and methods used to achieve those objectives for all emergency and off-normal procedures. Based on this, questions related to the general plant conditions under which a particular ERG would.be used are con-sidered relevant and permissible.