ML20137J764
| ML20137J764 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/15/1977 |
| From: | Markee E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Miraglia F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20136D877 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-475 NUDOCS 8509110251 | |
| Download: ML20137J764 (2) | |
Text
.
,i
~
m s..
~~
DIS.TRIBUTION:
O'TELL FILES
--....,. M'AR 15 1977
. NRR EDG.~. b:.& 4 d e -d>-J e J.
.......a g 4
DSE RDG-~*'I
.. [ H 55 '1tIiG $ Y M M / h.<r Q ?r W [.-ED~.:'.*
.I.. '.. t :. ). '.
- ..-~i~; = *9 :
cv - - >.
...a::E M-%
- ,s..x.:.c
- X.;;,,.z.
. - N.. ~~%,..W'.*.%,...+n$.h.vix..q:y.j..m.x a
. v..
r wa...........;
4 -^
h.- *
~ 13CEF.5DCi 70R:. 7. Eiraglia Tech 5ical f.ssi.stant -
Analysis
..'. h&.,.Dq. +,:vkc.-gc.c.rff.+.,44. Site ' Safety ahd
..@ d dh.@i./ F Di'viii'16'n6f
)
j
-w2. & ~ c.y i.~ -
we %,%.w..a. ".r c......-
%-u
- n..- y. c...
'4'..-:q cyp.~eu%. c
^. ' '
. a Earl H. Ifarlie' Jr:;-[T cader, reteorology Section, m!B l
w'--
Rati:
e s
. '.DT'-W5ih$. 55W$.'.?"~f ~ v & '.$
.'b~.
'^'?.
'T- $?jf.&&,.h.. PHILIFFINE PRELIMINARY SITE INVESTIGATI
'W S12 Ject:MM-f.
kW.'EU*5'bk!k.$k!N$$.$.'..
~..J :
ll...g.
Ja have revie Section,E4' Meteorologt df the subject report and. '
found.i.t',' to.'cin'tn.E~.aii. ex. horaver, vas lacking a description of anycellent ai.
site area.'
The section, i
l T onsiternete5rological conitoring system and nost i::portantly a disc +ission of local diffusion characteristics and calculations of any diffusion" estimates (7./Q values). L'itho.:t this type of infor--
r.ation, the proposed site.cannot be preparly evaluated fro = a ceteorological standpoint. T'e vould reco-= cad that the rhilippine Nations 1 Torar Corporction present in their report the appropriate onsite and/or offsite cetcorolo::ical data and provide the type of i
infornation indicated in Sacticas 2.3.3, 2.3.4, and 2.3.5 of
{
.Easulatory Guide 1.70 and the Standard Ravicv Pica. This review
.vns performed by L Jubach of cy section. The ramminder of the material t
presented appear adequate for a. detailed revi,ew.
. :.y' l'{
orida21 GC M E.!?.I?.2tsaJ.
F.arl H. I'trhee, Jr., LcAder i
Meteorolo y Section t
Hydrolocy-Feteorology Eranhh Division of Site Safety and 6
T.r.virot.catal Analysis
- t..
f cc: L Eoyd L, DeToung J. Pansaralla V. G=
111 L. Hu1=dn L Jubach l.
,s
..=,
r.q..
...... ;M,,
k, f. 8.
.l
' x,.,,..g 3,.... -,,
\\
.~
s.
bSE:H A DSE:
HMB I
oprics >
ay 4
RJuba EMarke N
_,r) 4/1n/77 t///./77 n.i A,./.7 3 j.____
re.= Asc. sis (n. S.ss Ascu asse.
h.,. w.;...,,...n...,,
~~ ~~
~ ^ - "
8509110251 850719 PDR FOIA SCHLEMM 85-475 PDR
e METEOROLOGY EVALUATION PRELI:4IllARY SITE IllVESTIGATIOt REPORT '
PHILLIPPIf4E fiUCLEAR POWER PLANT Sectim2.4 Meteorology of the subject report has been reviewed and found 's contain an excellent climatological description of the site area.1he section, however, was lacking a description of any onsite meteordogical inonitoring system and most importantly a discussion of local effusion characteristics and calculations of any diffusion estimmes (X/Q values).
Without this type of information, the proposed site cumet be properly evaluated from a meteorological standpoint.
It is reammended that the report present the appropriate onsite and/or offsitameteorological data and provide the type of information indica!ad in Sections 2.3.3, 2.3.4, and 2.3.5 of Regulatory Guide 1.70 and theStandard Review plan.
I O'.21 c 137;-
- ^~r
~ -- -,-.....,_,,
. _,, _ _ _ _