ML20137J751
| ML20137J751 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/16/1977 |
| From: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Lafleur J NRC OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS (OIP) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20136D877 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-475 NUDOCS 8509110237 | |
| Download: ML20137J751 (4) | |
Text
N-
..Z FJtif raglic
.1 HRDen. ten :
x d
p".9* ~1 6 g~,.
~ DRMuller, V. Moore i
..,J :. -
1.m RVollmer;
~4....,;/. :... n.7 e. g g-y..
4;r I. d..t.K:-H.
f.WGammi.11.
i 4
b
- 6. 7
.iJ.--;
y?9. :; u ;. mM ma,.cp.g;?+..s..
- . t 'a.. :. S,%+.HErns t 2..'.k
,.... ~g
- - :. M W, ~, S. m.. s,
e~
. %:lcM% :n&%.w. 9:.
DBlinch* T-
. v -c.,.w. 45:::.W &.b. ?:J=w gHulman. :-: c n-W.W u
. r.= = ~. ; -
.:g w..;., d
~.~s. w..
m
~
.:... y:.
- ~.-.. %.-.u;=sg. n:.y CStepp;. m..
..uw :w.. assw V..
... HEM FOR:iJoseph D. Lafleur, Deputy Director'..
.q
.e
,.n: -
ecp.iW Office' of Inteinational Programs
~+C.yp;.,AC' ~.. M -r.-.- Y V A >.9 %.
s.~N i& ys,....'f. t.. e>
c,..'.e.t'.:.,+ 9. C....4, ~?.
,k h,..
4 M
. cs-
- x..
v.
g
- gFR c9.. -- " ~ Harold it. Denton, Directorea 4 "t? *..< 'M4? e
.In. 3 S: S Division 'of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis
...C-llP.
.. " ^- M L:
azi.'../ jyy-QGWyB.9:-2*5.%-X rWMS -fh.=.d.C%:.>. -- y#L,. -
PHILIPPINE PRELIM.IN.A.R.Y S..I.T.E.. INVES.T,IG. ATIO.N RE,PO,RT. S.
+
"..c-n:-c. -.
M:
-.-~~.ms:..
s-u.
p : a ;.-s.y,...;,q.*y.s'klj-f : thXfi' 'SQ',CQ: x:.. p. y~... _
..m
. As pr)mur request of February 14,,1977, DSE has reviewed the subject
~ repoe The scope of the review was such to identify issues ~which warrant furt!aFconsideration by the prospective applicant.
An implicit ass 6mption i
f in tidsreview is that existing NRC criteria would be applicable to this prop:sd station.
l As a mismit of this review the enclosed coments were received from the DSE
,~
techri:aI staff.
Due to press of other business, the seismological review has meheen completed, but it is expected that our coments in this area can leibrwarded to you during the week of March 21. 1977. Depending upon existing piiorities and availability of staff, we would be happy to discuss thesecaments with your office.
~
i
-.a gy, N. R. Dwn I
Harold R. Denton, Director l
Division of Site Safety and.
l Environmental Analysis Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
}
Enclos;;ra:
As stated 3
~
cc:
B. C. Rusche E. G. Case i
. \\,
.y.
- 1..
v
- r-q;,. '.
3 ir
.~.
g 3
....c e
- DSE D51
_ l J!iirap, af.
Hau.gttton
... u o.
t 1
3/16/77 3lN77 em*
r -=.w.m. n...,.3 n am e:a v'
.y..... -..,....,.. r.e=
.u.
8509110237 850719 PDR FOIA SCHLEMM 85-475 PDR
ACCIDENT A ALYSIS EVALUATION PRELIhlt:ARY SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT PHILLIPPitiE fiUCLEAR POWER PLANT
~
Populmaa Density
/
The NaSnal Power Corporation has supplied demographic data period 1975-2020 me out to a'50 Km radius.
The population density at 50 Km (31 miles) for 1975 and 2020 is 87/Km2 and 477/Km2 respectiv
~
shows ne current and projected population at 50 Km radius to be Figure 1
~
and 3.M,045 respectively.
685 827 jectedMlations fall within the current NRC guide 1000 peuple/ mile 2 and respectively.
We see nothing unusual in the present and the projn:ted population at this site which would require the revi aiternah sites.
ew of Nearby Facilities 8
The light road traffic in the vicinity of the reactor site consists bus, jee;meys and tricyclas on Route 312 which passes within 15 K of mini-the site. The only marine traffic listed by the applicant on th m north of Sea, adjacent to the site, is by 20 motorized boats which carry s e South Chin'a persons.
o ten The airstrip at Morong which was used by the Long Beach Min currently unused and is not being maintained.
oration is patterns in the vicinity of the site.
No mention is made of flight We have noted no nearby transportation j
or industrial facilities which could affect the safe operation of posed nuclear' power plant.
Section 2.2.3, Evaluation of Potential Accidents, has not Been prov that we are unable to corrment further in this area.
so We do note from Figure 2.2-15 that a Naval Reservation is located about 15 proposed s'te.
,7
_.m
g.
2-Additiod coment_
It appean from Figure 1.1-1 that the turbine is in a non-peninsular NRC would request additional analysis to show that a turbine orientatim.
missile muld n'ot damage structures or systems critical for nuclear safety.
9 O
O e
4 I
i i
i l
t MAR 1G 977
e a.
Philippise Nuclear Fower Plant Unit No.1
~
7 10
.:aaajt4si 2
2,590/ KM
[1000/Mi.2 ]
/
YEAR 2020 108 i
r
~
z 2
1, 295/ KM O
k
[ 500/Mi. 2) aac I
O' 5
10 as 2>
5 3
Y EAR 1975 3
3o
/
10'
/
9 5
/
6 5
4 J
3 2
103 ttttItttt 10 20 30 40 50 Km.
DISTANCE FROM PLANT, KILOMETERS FIGURE 1 Cumulative Population Distribution
(;Qg y g
__