ML20137E744
| ML20137E744 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/18/1985 |
| From: | Wessman R NRC |
| To: | NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20136F037 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8601170307 | |
| Download: ML20137E744 (110) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:,,_ .m- y
. kit.
JAN 18 1985 Note to: (TRTGroupLeaders .
Subject:
Useful Depositions Attached is a list of useful depositions compiled by CELD. For cartain allegation reviess we should have read (and referenced in our SSE.Es) these
, depositions. Most of these depositions were made available to the TRT when we j were ensite.
topic), if you tilink we have missed Look overcontact something, the listC.(arranged Haughney by(x27297) who will obtain a' copy from OELO. ( . R. H. Wessman h cc: w/o encl. , C. Haughney 3., ,,w , ,m, ~= s4 . J
~
M ,l ~ -
,$ f i$ Ljpl% tw%). M%J P'9,f^[
J ]' ~ l
) 393 '
860117U307 851213 , PDR FOIA PDR GARDEB5-59 ,
- g-
.w .
hr -' *s . -
. , . t~ .
4
' Document' Name: -
SUMMA.RY OF RECORD - CPSES Requestor's ID: MATILDAL Author's Name: GSM/RGB/GA8/Lucas Document Comnents: Intimidation Alleg., and A11eg.-Derived fm Intimidation Pro. N
.t 4
... . . . . +
. ).
.s.
i i
* -<, + -
_ _. m _ u.- . tr :__;_ n.: ! ..r f_ . 40"i'~;%
- c . :e -
j e., z NRC* Intimidation in an Intervibw of an'Allecer The evidence consists of: " a Deposition of (July 25, 1984), a tape recording of the alleged intimidating interview a written transcript of that interview. 9 6 e 5 e 0 0 e 9 I'* e g A I ',
?.s . ,
- l. __ - . e .
o .
.s .
- '2-5/1-
~
Intimidation of OC Inspector in Auxiliary Building allegedthathbserved a' general foreman or cable tray supports, yelling and shouting o scenities qC at a QC inspector for " red-tagging" too many cable tray supports. t
. . The evidence on this incident consists of:
Deposition of (July 12, 1984), ( ' 9 E e l j
,[
\;; - +- -
~
s .. . . .. . s
- )
1 .__-- = m_ .- . .
- 3.-
Intimid'ation of Welding QC Insp&ctor in North Valve Room aiCPSES,allegedthatEsawa I QC inspector ident y improper we ing in the North Valve Room. Accord-ing tom the QC inspector left, saying he was going to stop it, but later returned and did not stop the improper welding. The evidence on this issue consists of: DC r Deposition of (July 12, 1984), OI Report 14 August 1984) ! OI Report (13 March 1984) OI Report at 23 (7 March 1984) l i l
=
l 1 8 l l -
. s ,
,a
4- ' Stanford Incident i Alleged intimidation regarding voided NCR written by l wrote NCR on QC inspector indicating he had falsified ates, us enabling craft to bypass Q o d points. NCR was voided. Applicants assert that dates were changed only to correct error. t The witnesses and their testimony which deal with the alleged incident are as follows: ,
)c 1
g st 2 1 4 Deposition of july 28,1984 s / Deposition of July 24, 198 i l Deposition of July 25, 1984 1 M Deposition of ; July 25, 1984 a W f July 25,1984 . Depos4 tion of Jul.y 10, 1984 Testimony of (10/1/84)
- Testimony of (11/26/84) ;
e timony of August 15, 1984
' Prefiled Testimony of'M Augusdt 16, 1984
~ Prefiled Testimony of. August 16, 1984 Pl Prefiled Testimony of , August 16, 1984 (uma Prefiled Testimony of gnd Augsut'15, 19 f
Prefiled Testimony of_ , August 15, 198 See 01 Report M (12 September 1984) ,
~
N ~ r- ,
- 7
+ - -
~
Intimidation of Protective Coating OC Inspectors at CPSES, a ege at e was aware o attempts by upervisor
' to intimidate protective coatings QC inspe ors.
The idence consists of the Department of Labor Transcri ection 210 complaint, o GQ
. See esoecia y:
Testimony of DOL Testimony of M M DOL
. Testimony of M M , D Testimony o $ DOL 70 Testimony of DO Testimony of DOL Testimony of , DO 01 Report (24 August 1983) l l 01 Repo>t (3 November 1983)
OI Report (26 July 1983) O! Report at 19, 21 (7 March 1984) OI Report (10 February 1983) OI Report (18 October 1983) 4 h l . .
. ,,;^ _. _
e .
-2 .
Termination Allegation that QC inspector was terminated because of complaints concerning QC. M iled a complaint with the Department of Labor claiminterminationpaperstate was j fired for criticizing the QC program, and one n particu-lar.
- The parties have stipu hted that imon ined in the record of the DOI. hearing I
(February 13 and 14,1964 . During the evioentiary depositions in this p icants presented further testimony on circumstance surrounding termination: i, Deposition of ; July 10, 1984 ' Deposition of July 11, 1984 Deposition of July 9, 1984 Testimony was also given by Applicanti during the hearing sessions of September 11 and 18,1984: 3 Testimony of (9/11/84) f Testimony of (9/18/84) By Order dated November 30 n the DOL roceeding dismissed
- M complaint " Recommended Tecision and Order .
OI Report 27 July 1983) ~ OI Report (10 February 1983) 01 Report 24 August 1983) I a-P i
~
i >- . ,
- . - - - - -_ _ _ _ _ * 'o...-______
~ -
f : T-Shirt Incident Iritervenor alleged that electrical QC inspectors wearing T-Shirts were intimidated by management. Certain electrical OC inspectors were wearing T-shirts referring to
. " nitpickers." They were subsequently sequestered by management and their desks searched. (There is a question of their prior involvement with
" destructive testing" prior to the incident.) ,Some of those involved were later transferred or tenninated. Applicatns assert management might have overreacted, but the actions taken were not intimidation.
Evidentiary depositions:
. Deposition of July 16, 1984 i
Deposition of uly 17., 1984 Deposition of July 31, 1984;
}
Deposition of July 10, 1984 l Deposition of ; July 10, 1984 Deposition of July 11, 1984 Deposition.of uly 11, 1984; Deposition of July 10, 1984 Deposition of July 17, 1984 Hearing Testimony: Testimony of (9/10/84) f Testimony of ( . 7 Testimony t i (9/11/84) . Testimony of V !9/13/84) . Testimony of (9/13/84)
- of (9/14/84); .
i f l.
'/
=
..1
'L ' ' . * , . . . , . ,
., r...
~
~ -
8 Testimony of (9/20/84) Testimony of (9/20/84) Testimony of 10/1/84) OI Report 24 *,ugust 1923) l l e en e e a i, ( , ll
. s * - ,
l i ~T- . . t, a *
- s' , ,
= ,
L
.e
- e
..g.
Liner Plate Traveler Incident (A) alleged that was intimidated into signing off on Oc
.w eld o d points on liner pia e ravelers.
allegedly was ordered to sign off QC weld hold points for fitup an c eanliness on travelers for the stainless steel liner plates of the Unit 2 reactor cavity. Msignature was to be verified by inspection chits purportedly e by other inspectors for these hold points a few years previously, id not a .that the chits matched the hold points g was to sign. alleges was compelled to sign under threat of losing the upc weeken off. Applicants assert that the procedure was to follow was proper and thereforegwas not intimidate , , [ Note: This allegation has resulted in another separate issue at the 1C hearings following the evidentiary depositi.ons, the adequacy of the OC l weld documentation for the liner plates. See Deposition of l ] g August 16, 1984 . j Evidentiary depositions: Deposition of st 1, 1984 an August 2,.1984 9D
- Deposi' tion ofMJuly 31, 1984 Deposition ~of July 24, 1984 Deposition of' July 25, 198 Deposition of M July 25, 1984 OI Report (12 September 1984)
O e O O o
- r
- q. .
- ' 't ' '
r . n
# % e" % ,
O
" *' . . , - - _ _ - - - - . ._ ._m _____ _., _ y -- - .
1
.c . *'-
.. l
.10 - -
l , \ 1 ! Liner Plate Traveler Incident (B) Intervenors alleged that there was a QC breakdown in the documentation l of the liner plate welds. As a result of documentation which was supplied by Applicants in the course of testimony on " Liner plate traveler incident (A)," Intervenors raised the issue of an overall OC breakdown in the QC process as applied to the liner plate welds. Appifcants responded with testimony ostensibly refuting each of the alleged deficiencies. [ Note: The ] subject of the adequacy of OC inspections and their documentation of the i liner plate welds has been looked into by the TRT. The TRT's conclusion is not yet known.] Evidentiary record: The. background and context for this issue is in the material listed in
" Liner plate incident (A)."
Depositicn of ; August 16, 1984
" CASE's Evidence o a ua ity Control Breakdown" ate September 27, 1984 Prefiled Testimony of October 3,1984 m ,
" CASE's Further Evidence of a Quality control Breakdown in the Construction, Installation and Inspection of the Stainless Steel-Line,r Plate" dated November 15, 1984 3 /
~
~
l ! ,- ( . l
, .- :, l
( '
- 11. - ,
1 l
*'oiding
. of NCR on Polar Crane ,
at CPSES, alleged at an NCR which wrote regarding a hole in the polar crane rail was improperly voided an the hold tag improperly removed. The evidence on this allegation consists of: C., , Deposition of (submitted as prefiled written testimonyp
.01 Report (9 July 1984) 01 Report at 26 (7 march 1984) e e
4 t I
- 9 l
> > . -1 E
- 9 , g g 4 9 8 e.
,, * ~4 *
,; ,A
~ .
.s.
s l l l
- t. .' .
j
l
. ,1
-12.- .
~A Weave Welding on a Pioe Support'in the Auxiliary' Building t CPSES, alleges
~~
at wrote an NCR dentifying unacceptable w ve welds on a pe support in the Auxiliary Building. Accordin ' as intimidated by craftworkers and by into improperly accepting the welds on the N . The evidence on this allegation consists of: ' l Deposition of (July 13, 1984) I Deposition of submitted as pr filed ; written testimony In addition, substant'ai testimony on this allegation was received by a all parties in the technical portion of this proceeding. See generally: March 19-20, 1984 hearing session transcrip April 24, 1984 hearing session transcript, f l OI Report (9 July 1984) j
, of 4
OI Report at 26 (7 March 1984) i . . I' l
, j
.g a.
L f j l G t l-l
- hr l -
.c. .
. - ,-j P 4
[ t
~
'I
- 13.-. .
l Welding of Diesel Generator Skids t CPSES, alleges ; _ that as. harass and int midated by l when e assigned S to conduct inspections o we s on the diesel gener- :l ator skids for CPSES, even afterMprotested thatgwas unqualified
=
to conduct these inspections. The evidence on this issue consists of: }' July 13, 1984), Deposition of. (submittedas
; .prefiled written testimony) '
See OI Report (9 July 1984); (7/19/84) f l l so I i l . I 1 , 1 1 l I l p * . p /
, .,e,. ;- - - - . --
-t. - ' ' ' '
I, l Weld Symbols on Doors at CPSES, conttrds I to improperly accep . doors which had
~
I was not been properly welded n accor ance with the design drawings for the doors. The evidence on this allegation consists of: (July 13, 1984), C. gi (5" *'***d
$UNU"ritt 1
1 a e
- w
=
l . ~ l; '
~. ,c- ,
.; 7.. .
4 '
' 15.-
Harassment Due to Relocation of an Office CP L , claims
~ that was harassed by Applicants after giving testimony in the July 1982 earing session in this proceeding. The harassment consisted of moving fice four times over a two-day period, and of finally <
placin in a shack that M laimed was unsturdy, dirty, unaircon-ditioned or three days, and smaller thangoriginal office. The evidence on this incident consists of: Deposition 13 1984 t
. Deposition of July 20, 1984)
Deposition of (July 20, 1984)/ -> Deposition of (submitted as prefiled written testimony i See OI ReportsM (3/7/84); M (7/9/84) l I e
- D e
0 e O \ . . .
- 26 ~
Harassing Telegram Accusingf__ f Improperly Copying Documents t CPSES alleoes t etter sen p ican
.(as well as the other parties) accuse of stealing and lying, and t reatenedgtermination if caught. In ity, a telegr ,not a letter, was~sent t and the telegram did not accus of lying and stea ing. her th '
egram suggests tha
-Wwasimproperlyencouracing to copy and remove documents i from on-site.
The evidence and relevant material consists of: 7 Deposition of (July 13, 1984), Telegram (attached to CASE's Motion for Protective Order) (August 12,1982) d wr t 1 ,.)- , ,' z; . ;s . . . 7 l~, -
.,s -
1 . . .
- 17 '
I l Incidents Intended to Have M Leave CPSES
' t CPSES, related i
_ a series of incidents wh c 1 eves were in to forcMto -
- leavegemployment_at the S site. These related inc is a
(1) meetings with R dTolsonandj where claims they pressed ut hea t an (2 request that bring a _ doctor's note in eac wee 'to ce pability to work; and (3) an incident where 'was ' refused admittance to a bus carrying workers 'to CPSES, which i ames upon articles in the Circuitbreaker (a company newsletter distributed at the site). The evidence consists of: i Affidavit of (August 1, 1984) (
, Deposition of ~(submitted as l I
prefiled written testimony) _ Testimony of
- Deposition of (August 2, 1984),
_M, ' See OI Reports (3/7/84); M (7/9/84) - G
~
i s ~ s . ,
- 3 481 oga **wm g
- 18.-
muumu M testified as a Board witness on September 18-19, 1984, was employed as a at CPSES from January 1983 to De Because Considering background includes an undergraduate degree in eens ry, a graduate degree in Polymer Science, and revi us engineering j and inspection experience at several nuclear plants lwasoneof i the most qualified QC inspectors ever employed at CPS S. g l Mrecounted several incidents relating to t Ynd intimidation. The first incident involve job interview wit According to as a result of E meeting with had a st.rong impression that notwithstanding M expertise, did not want Mto question QC proce ures or enoingering judgments. The second incident involved a concern S lhad regarding M review and re design change authorizations (DCAs). Accordino to raised these questions to
, who wassunable to answer questions, instead took to office to discuss the ma ter. At hat meeting, accor ing to I M indicated to hatMwas not to concern if with engineering matters ut instead was to. concentrate all of '
efforts on perfo tions. M was later called to discuss the same matter with Asaresultoftheseencounters,$ ' M testified tha was reluctant to write an NCR unless it was &
" garden-variety" type NCR.
The third instarice of harassment alleoed b involved members f f the painting crew. According to was ordered by a paint foreman, and other painters to perfonn inspections. stated that if did not acce heir demands, a complaint would be lodged with who invariably sided with , craft. The fourth incident involved an NCR written by reporting an-indeterminate substance on a coated surfac h . nspected. M t M testified that after writing the NCR told ! not to report for; work the next day but instead report direct t M on next scheduled work day. During this meeting questioned. Judgment and s'uggested thatEwas pa. ranoid. The fina}' incident reccunted by involved the.al'leged use b , aint rs of cigarette filters in e spray painting equipment. In view, painters inserted cigarette filters in the cheater valves l
' of spray guns to pass the air acceptability inspection because the filters l
, made the air supply appear cleaner,than it s; the ainters then would -
1 l remove the filters after the test. . Befor could report this ! alleged confoming condition, however, a comp aint was I wi h supervisors. A meeting was held between
- 1
.', s .
j
- r
. . l e . . ;
~
- 1. . . .
t > . 4
. c -.
. 3.
l , 19 - ' N l
, the paint' foreman, and ccording to M sided with the painters because id not have personal knowledge that the filters were removed by painters subsequent to the air acceptability test and because the use of cigarette fil rs was not a j
violation of any procedural requirement. Consequently, did not )M
- write an NCR. It should be noted that the Technical Review eam has confirmed allegation.
l Citations to the testimony by and Applicants on the matters described above are as follows: A. initial meeting with M, (9/19/84 (12/3/84 (11/28/84) (11/28/84 11/28/84) , B. _ Meeting with Tolson and @ Concerning M q Review an esign Change Authorization /C.
/
9/18/84)
- (9/19/84) l (11/28/84 Wreactore s
l11/28/84) 4 (11/28/84 (HCR re 1 cavity) _ (9/19/8a) (NRC re reactor core activity) (11/28/84 (NCR re' reactor core { (12/18/54) C. Harassment by Painters
- 4) .
E. Detergent on Coated Surfaca NfR ;,
/
x . j , ,s s s' .
. s 4
, ~
- . ~ * *
,s p.
I
.s ', s . , .
- 9 s .
O l.
F. Cigarette Filer Incident
-- (12/3/84 OI keport (26 July 1983) .
I
)
I i . I l l i l 9 l l i [. , J c v -
, ~. .
.',. '; r . .; -< - .' .
, . .- >~
(W de a e f .
Trio .4ecort in July It'~ visited CPSES to evaluate ants' coati ram pent three days at CPSES rving the c at ngs E
. cram anc son'< ins with site pers . After eturned to detailing wrote a report to servations hnd conclusions
%g regarding poiican coatings program. report - -Je expressed the viaw that the coatings program was plague y many problems including lack of painter qualification, poor traceability and storage of materials, quality control reporting to craft, and TUGC0 management's lack of commitment to quality. ~ report concluded with two -
explosive obse'rvations: (i) that parallels could be drawn between the CPSES and Zimmer plants; and (ii) that OBC bid for a " rework" contract M with TUGC0 because 'little, if any, of the coatings work already in place ~- was salvageable. ; The M trip report somehow found its way into the hands of the NRC, the Intervenors, and the Dallas /Ft. Worth news media. The public disclo-sure of the report set off a chain of events culmincting in the recanting nf the concerns and conclusions expressed g in 4 g *- subject of tir The reasons behinW turnabout is the s aspect of the intimidation proceeding. The testimony j relevant to this inquir may be found at:
@gr.Q/cy;WC. iip,'j.gz '.J." 10/1/84)NNkh.M b.[.b . ?j Q m .Mf . (.1/19/84 %:e.m
'g Q ..;'."(. $,4 'Z.n,;.:
i
- w. .. .
Q.K.?f( @.;. o v .i.y$$@.$.:.; hN# l (:.1/20/84)%,5fid.M.5$ Diy. 3{.p y.[y..i t iW/> ( 11/20/84) % Q jf7p 3 ( 11/20/84)
- .p.M:.y .'.m4: e. . M/%fM...
12/3/84) i
- . . l12/4/84) kN.hh
..(. , $hM
'12/5/84) '
$ 4 f d p/ M b Jf-%, J12/17/84) (Evid. Dep. of hh ;m. 7 ML.<
if ( 1/3/85) (Evid. Dep. of ' hr.k g 1 g[6;.: .m p ( 1/5/FO (Evid Dep. of j' 3[N'F l DUf( . Y$ 1/7/85) j [.e ypwyl.py
') u QWrh 178795) k%%%, .
~
',\~.
.t .. ,_
<. y
' ,U. '
=
, s. s
l , 1 M ation o l alleged that%was teminated for reporting a gouge in a pipe to a inspector. 11egedly discovered a gouge in a pipe near where@was welding a pipe ha r. $ oreman supposedly wanted t witnessed s'howi the gouge to OC inspector _ Shortly t ereafter I]wasterminated. Applicants asse 'was terminated for abs'en eeism. Evidentiary depositions: 4 fc Deposition of July 13, 1984 j Deposition of August 2, 1984 < Deposition of uly 9, 1984 i Deposition of July 19, 1984 j Deposition of July 9, 1984 l i l . . l 1 1 i i k i s * /
,p'=
G
~ ~ - ,. ,_
~
- i s
~ ,
- , , .,s . , , , , _ _ , . # 5* ' ' ' ' * ' ' '^ ' ' ' ' ' '
i l ,. . . , i 1 .i : l Valve disk incidbnt l M alleged that wh,en brought a discrepanc in valve disk l l numbers to the attention f. supervisor, he told it didn't matter, which made " discouraged." _ was shown a traveler by with a valve disk n g num er w ic did not match the d k number of the Data Report. Whtn W '/ C e brou ht this to the attention of supervisor, Ihe told it didn't matter and wou cost too much money e c ec . Applicants assert that it really didn't matter and deny that cost would l be a factor if the discrepancy were real, l' l Evidentiary depositions: l f i July 28, 1984 ; Deposition of_M July 10, 1984 E Testimony: Prefiled Testimony of (8/16/84) Prefiled Testimony of (8/16/84 and 8/18/84) I 1.
, es, a
9
=
, ~~. ,, *, ,
'c' , --
-g - < a, ,
- ' -': -t
~
. ..> . ..~. ,. ; , ,
9 ".d*a
._i.,.,e+w =,ao . = . , . . ' .,a .+, ,,
.4., .sw.,..- g. . , y
4. l
, l
. - \ Pressure on N-5 Viewers ! alleged that undue pressure was applied to QA/QC document reviewers. alleged that W superviso pressured / intim dated the N-5 document reviewers by: 1 deman ing iso's a week; (2) threatening the use of job shoppers; (3) corrrnenting on company loyalty. Evidentiary depositions: 9O f s July 17, 1984 ,
; July 31 -
l Testimony: Prefiled testimony of (8/16 & 8/18/84) 1 Prefiled testimony of (8/16/84)
- Testimony of (9/13/84) e I
{.. .
- e
[
- j. _~' ~. >
-((.'
- i.
' i 4 5
~*
, = ~ _. .- - . . - - .
l
# *- ~
i . , - 6 i l 1 1 l OES ' Review Sheet ~ Incident l alleged that W supervisor ordered a reviewer to sign
. off a QES review sheet without doing the review.
11eged that% ordered a reviewer M to si n ff on a cover sheet when the original was missing without having do the review. Applicants assert that this is an acceptable practice. -) O Evidentiary depositions: s uly 17, 1984 , July 31 Testimony: Prefiled testimony of (8/18/84) Prefiled testimony of (8/16/84) Testimony of (9/13/84) t e e 4 O e e4 *b e I
/
,r 9 e f Q f* , p
~,
e
* . , .. ?.
.'" 'j ,
9','
, e *,,;- ,
, ., .,. r
* * , ,- .i, i .
.* +* , .
- 9* g' ,
i ,, , . . ,
, j 26 -
l Reduction of Force (ROF) Incident alleged that there is something wrong with the way employees are select d for a ROF. , Malleged that the more qualified people were ROF'd. Applicants l response is that there is a comprehensive, mainly objective method of selection. - CD ' fridentiarydepositions: s July 17, 1984 July 31 Testimony: Pref.iled testimony of 8/16/84) Testimony of (9/13/84) i 1 b
. l l
I 1.- L e O , e 1 l l
^- --
,' - ~
, ,q ' , '
# . ,. fi 1 i ,
e
- e
* *L - - - - - - - , = _ __ _ ,3., _ _ , l
2-: h
! ,j g
1 -
. 4 2
H
. 28 _
il 4 . , . ;, t ..g , _ r v. . :i'"y -v 2 4 , - , +-- .,.f- t c. - 3 h.?My W, . . C. 6 ri. u, ; :,?[; ,'0 >Kfiif ye G pL.# v %
- 4. .. f.%'d , 5,'. 9 i 'h. ? i' J'. .g.p' ;- 5~?.' ; ,9 / g.u.. .<T,.. r.V ..,%..$,.? "k t ' ~. ' 9
--: ; . "i y*t J >, . ; , ' r' ;'s t
( - j.
-k .
. '. _ J ,9 2
' : .*h. N} {.f f.
.- e -%
n.
-l
,.*' -i ,9 ,.,^ .: /; (.. L'. S 7.
,- ~ ,fg {,, p-. { { -g%$ ',y '
r 6,- ' .. -
- s t.
-,i . %.. . , c e. %, .. . .. . .- . '- ,,
ag g, .-
.*-(.
t .g-< 3 ;,
,e .
3 .g. , y t,.s .e
, , .,,,r,.cg. .,.i
,..,,i ,.
ej, '?, ,'. _ l, i . ', $. ". , .k, 6 '4, . ,. ,*; -- ,. , - g [ ' , c ,:l.,', 'y,( ;.' .(,, c.. .:.j. -. '. -a;g,
- t. , . -
. ' ' q - y-
.m y. . j
.- , y '- _r -
- .y.<- .,a ..g--
s, .%j. ; ,, , .,c..... :; > . ',.:-y,,Q , p . +.,. ;s=.-"- :', 4g;g s . ~,. . . +, f. v;, ... p'..,..:y. i't;. ns ,, ,~. . ..*' .' . . J,
.y.'
'yg4-
..n..~ .e.. y- (.
,e '>
-..; z. ,.c' w >
+ :a , .'
., .s. s a. , :. . n,w R. .
su.. , i .
+
-y y
u/. ,..'.c.'.is,,,
.v ' t g' ge ,.
, . . 3.w
.p .- ,, ,.
fp.o.. y - * * , 5 a
--q-. - -. ;_. = % i, , .", p'.
.7,. 4-- ? . . .- , e . tb *.
,,.'<e~,>
, . %' . . #, -y d, ,.,3J . . py,-s V' W g: ;.4 3 3 1[; ', w , ,' '
h ' .. -
.?.-e . v:.
.. c -4
'; .-g'74 i 4 g
. ' ' 'j, :. -" J 4% - . : , .. . p,x'. . ,g...s
.sc- *, ,.g
. I! ' /Nq;;:, . ' ,g$A --l 'Ai-
. >*. .. ,n .u,
. i y?+ =g
. +,'..u., gr , .=
y . . ' ipv.v, A,v :
- f. .
-T - y .
+ a *,% l . - " < q r '. g/.,.id -
+
,-A . ,. yn,p4 -
^
@w b5 ,;f+l p
.4 rf.J A
.# 'ik ,.: y.g
} , .y.-] {j. . . % ,', ' y~. *4 '. J s c . g .d.. 1
< 7 * %}*. t 5 . .
. . . . . .c .
,.=,v4.,..- . , (m , ', j /.,.;.j.,3,%*e; ; .:g ,' '. 'i m.pg,,T-r, . .p
.c.J . vl
; -.,s . ,r.("g . g . .: ,95 . . S. . .
.- .f4 ..'e 5 -; . .. H OA "- - ,. -
. 7:. '*:y!?.'4
..;-$Q :;'y j,'y' j,j* y
.$ _ a[.
- it.,' ,i g" c ... . .g i o
.y ,
.t ;,1f
,,> r
,'e_ -
{ v> Q .
'v. n;=Mg.,
y g" S, . . , - *(%.g
%. . cyf' 9, .
- . n $. l- }- If%F,',.'%
g ,. d*v _ . - c r s^ - e
,(M's .b; j s . [,,_q . ~,' ~ $.
,, . . ,.. .y.,.1
% e .w. Np;&. 7 ,.;; o ,;. '.,' 'i 'ii 3
j .-( .; ,i , *i ,q',g$j;['.
- ~ - ; , ;. P
' m' t
,. Jt [ g. $ , 4 g t y:,[V./
; . . . 2
'iq W $;3 c
t,'g.-
} _ . . , , 2
.M, ,' i f ! . / 2 ' N, . , i q,.-;#). - I
. . Ja j L!. , . 'b' A 4 ,' .9 #
- f. 34 .c.,[% y% fi lNy eg ,r; . '.'-+nt%-)h,'y t . a ,a
, k. e. ,:' V., S' +' > ~ ,. r.h
", : ,:, .,; ,;..iy' . -, w~..? '- g;
- c. ,
u s.'
;. m
-~
m Q . . e [:. '.. .
- e. , .'. . ,
e
'g
%d '.
?
7 f a
'j l n_ ,
- 1 i.' -
l i,1 a i l ' a! m o . J 1 t a i n{ i p s y ? f'- -_ T u dl _ m B ss Y
-d
.f A F .-
~--
, s
! b 's i ! % l l i; l 4 h, ! $ i { l P . ., -
. ..~..
*, O m
- 4. ) ~
, / ) t' ,/
/
Witness F \
. . . .. . :..f .
" , . - . ,. . . '*,%. - '. . .. . f,J . . : n , . .. ny... --
- - - - ), -
_ f %; ';(- ,,{.., . . . f. ' s,j { [ .G.g * , - - ., - '. -q. if6 [ -d , {l i % ,.< , ; ' - i i - 0- '. f 3 y . . ; , . a, . . .y ~ , . : ; , ,3 -% i_ ; , ., . . . :p3
. .s \.. ,
. . p'K. : .~. ... n,
.s.. . ...-'. -, g' A ' ' . .. } . c,,'v. tf c
n....-
.[.[ + , i ' ,' .,' .
.,8-
..,. 'i .
.v . -' .n* .. .i., '. .:..
C- e 6- '.- . . s.:{: .i- '.
< 1
*. - v . *' , ,.g ' ' . .g", -. .' { (' . ,..L
., -. .V ,: m -
l l < - c' ; M.,
*~ - -
3 ,; , Du . : '? l
. , . .. i. 3 '.*+,N.,-
'_.4 .
. w
,[.,,,, . ; :
.r . .
a .
' l? , ; ,..,'..,:,,'.,,...: v-..-- ....,-}'..
[.<i..- Jf- . [ , . ..f 4 ,
,.J , . - . l
+
, _ - y,
' '. 1 . ..'..'x.;..n .. . ' . ]-
,L.- ~...:..
d . ". : ?... p.,.- e . .
..; . ., <%' ~ ..,. ..-. .., . ;
, . , , :..- .. - .a c A-:. ' ; . . , , ' .
1
- p. ,, ca ., .. ' 3 s .. . . -
*'...1 ,: a v.'
y..? o'. .,, .'. ,-._.._.._.c'- . -'. J ( : i.' . ..:. ; ' g . ) :x / .' . J. de , '? *. q.;(, ' ._-
. . , w. . , - > >..I ...+
- f , , , * ,y * .-'_. ., ' . [ . ,;.
7.,, i -y ,.3 t g..
,*,'. 39 ,. . , .* .. ,, , f, .
.:,n...
- s. . .,. q
_a'. e , ;. s
. ; . ?
.' . y, e. . . ;.;.,
.%..- y k. ..- c..-
s
, , - v: . '. . . , .. ,... . .. .
w .e. . .
.: y , . . i. . . : .~ ). < ..
\
.., ; *:. 2
.s- : .:
v..
- ,. . :. . ~,, "2.
. l - .-
1 a v .e.
*,s"..;. ; . e. s; s -t,. . . - .; :
.g.%...' .i:,. s ;n% .s . .
j ,f. - 1 ..,..f .. ' . ' . . - . . ' .wr.,.., ,.,
,,. .' . . , . ..t. - ,',',.t.'.'.,-
a'
>.g. ,g'gW.
- (. -3 ,
. $, 4
. . s5 ,
.,,a .g,.,,. N.
..- .? - ./ P v - .. . . . - . ,- E-,, a
.- .. g g..
y) , g ..,g ?,<, _, ,;./ ~. f 2, . f' . . '-) -
\).,, ,
..; l..:
n'".
. . l .- ' '
- .. s
, ' ' . ' . ,g; . , , . 9 - - - ,. p h. j, . .*
. ., y:. ' l
- l. . , .-..'i.
- .' . ,7 ,
. . y
. '(. .. * ; ,. y ,
-,t....:
..4- s.
4 A.
.f. ,. . , . . .- .:.y
.....q' -- - . . . , ,,, q .,
. . , : ;. . .- } - .. . , .. .. . . . .
4>s.,s. k.- ;.- - ; ;
.\
- e. s - .../t". - ,, - ..
s ..
> .a w . h.
.sl ., .
' . - - - + . . -* * -
G -
... . - - ; .,:-, - - 2 * -
,e,..,.,s.
$c'gb. I'
. 9y.7-
. ' ','- . _.^ -g. r: . "[ ,' b . ~ .. ..-. . ?
4
--11Y '.,' ' '. . . . .. N ,'. ..[,. ,1. ['
' ], . ,
l
.$. . */
, n , .-,. ]
x 5 .9.:,-
. ,%, '. y ~.g .,.
9, . -. . .'.
@ s,; .
.t,',,.;p.-.,-.~.- .,..s ,.3 ",.-,.2
'. g.(. .,* , . 'e
- e. i .
?, ., i $
.......4.,-.,.
4..
.t
$.? g, , . p,e,-.. . . :. ' . .<-i
. . ... . .- r,'- S,e
., .,. .., .y ,. 9'),.'
s ht3 - h . . 'f, e ' - - *
.".,ps,,-+J..,. ,- .
c
'c . '4 ,e.,.
jL g., .,. y. h . o v. .',." w *'i,. v
. y, 3, .,. .W
_. >...:: ; . . . . . . t),d ' , ', >:. '., *"3 , , ' ," , . ..
,.,s ' : . , ._"L
...t . %.
s-
,Q,.,., 3
' . ,p ' n'-_,pg..}.- . } .
. L ;;a.,
e . c
,8
,,'s
=
... , ..,o _ ,
'e.,.,
- --_ i r . : . . . _ .'. -...-
~ . . 1,; .
^
r *r. . s - . _ . ,
.o % M 'J. <g .- .: .
A* #',,;.,..i ; . '.,;
, e .- ,
r: ; < . .. 2
..~,,ly, s
.-t ,
._.s', . ,:_ . - sy_
. ,< , = _ . . <., , :. , % .,;,;m,. y s,, . _ , _q...
u, 1.; ;; ;-
. . , . .- ., , ; , s. ; -
- ,< . .s, . .- g c a,
' y ^. : .V ,' , . ; a-. g3. - ...,: w- .. ; f., . .: .. *:,;-- , , .-.,; . g -
s ; - ,.,:5% 1 ;) y - ^ ;& 'y '_
;:q l:s . w... .:s a..r.
.'... ... %....,,.'+p'
.: a : s ?- -
,A. u.
.'.,. u . .. A-
*.4 r a V.,.. ', k ; .9 :- [.T
%. . . + .a t , . ..$. .. .nr ; . s ._ .
- u. YJ .-,[k y- ., .m'. ,.
. . .n .
. +., ' >
.14,;'. . * , - f *f - "A $-;f,g.
, , ,*: ,S : . ' .: i ,-~. S
- .',,,,.. ..,,5..
3y.*' - . ' 'v %O.,',...e; $.. ' -. . ..4 <.6. ' ;.
, , .,3 .
- *ac'. . .2"f T. ( 7. l*~h ':. ..ve. ' .. y.e-a
*. g2
..u;2
.,*.s' .
. -e r,: , . -
.19 . - , .'y '.. 'V %.' si( ,g.- ..-
- !. e : V: ..'**-
.'. - ':-- ,: .- i, . -
k:.? ; %% n.t . . ' .~;,- . . , ;.' ' . s'
- o. ;.
S.. F
.w....~..*:.*;,,'3..
^
.- C.? illV-
.s.2,., .:.
y: :. . ~ .o >. '. :.
.3 . . :...
- 34. O. ..:y. ..:
L. a f;. g ; :'.&.;...
. ;..;, . . . r .- .
;.r,-:; .g. ;. ds"
, '? ; ll .f V ' ' 3, *. :,.h - * . -p. -, .:., - ' :.' *
. . 4f'. 2. . g,:- ;;' W ':.s:.
;. ese .1:lq., .
- l
.u m, x, . .v; 4 .. .,; .., . . . -A.
. - . ,i. .. .-t.- .,* c m; y:. .? ..
. ~".e:. s,. ,. . .7.;.a. .,,%j.L; .'. oa .\.
wv:2 ,
- . o.
. 2< ' . - ..;; y. : . . : - y.s .~ ..g.v
,. . : 7. .. ~N i..
- .c.s. + ;. w . 6
. , y .'-n' s.,
&u..+s.A ov -
rN;-},o s.* 2
.- n .~ & :,: . . '. .y ., ,,.s.. gM;;g '
- u 2
-c.- ' i.8 '.::; ' -
R.:..s .-Q; L : ;>. < ; .... - ,.r :~;.?l .y - i: f..a..,.m:;%,s,b..-.U v 6;.J. vi; &s 3:.. .
.a :- ..- -
- < v -
. ..r. '. . ,. p , j!, .
~...t .n.
y%;".....;uf j y&m% y:P:h - Y t. a ' 4 :. M ' V - V e.f p ': ^ . N g . W. m..&[ y:. p% .
,;s...
,,a..~
ir. e ' '". f 3 .L. ,3 "..=. W- ,;i.: ,y
} ;..n..% p_ g.).y1,.; .
Nm ;;7 .~: ., o .1'.Ap,0;M,
,, ; - . 4 ..n.; .
V.. 75,: f .!
,qt . . .c +9 . , .
a . y - . h *; g.. % . . .. .
. , . ,. x*.. o .A,e.%.,a h.
. .e,-,
. ,4
. .. - ' ..p..
.p4
.:..v..~..-
a 't. .x . . . , ,-.., c@.
. v,. . g .
. . . :' .. .. .. n.. ".
n 2,.r ,:g. =.;... : n
.,o..e. : t'
.: .4 *.g' . ... %, .i.. y :- - :s - :. g: . - . g-r n.... ya.
., ; ,,:.j t, .: ._
.,' 7,, - . .:,. . - ,% ~g . .
. ....;g W,. j .p . qq . . .v- ."" . au .p; .. ~ .: ... .
y.v. , h> y.;j Q >,.f+W:2 h.. Y. .? ' :k.'O, i V%. ' :, .
,&.' %..,.-. try, G.. ..:kV.n.[&. g&. f. :2 %5 s.1 'E
! ; 5.%; I W ,.. . . .
l J.;v.e.' . .3. . .' ' .r..c. . . b? . -Q,. 3 . c.1h?n ~,,
. eg W. n; , nv.. ;: . .da. :. 1
,'y. , ....*: ,'. , y
.n 4;. -
W***,t y ; w .. e.
. e, N.* . ..+ ~.:. g . ~ 4, ? '
~
t 4* % , ~.71. t.n - R.c .>. h i ". : : E. - f., h.
;; ? .?:i..- e wi %
t
, } ,l', (1 .- .%
B . g, v t. r 4n..a :s ., uy .,. ..
. s..'. e ,.,1 ,.lmwJ.n ,. %'. .- . . s' . pU : ce ..o a
- .a, ;9 3 L:g q p;. ; q .y:. .M_a. ay. f.p.g. s: . :s. . ....: ;; 4. -a , ; ..; ~:/.> . r.
g:$ . - :- :- F; k h, d M N ; [y: .Q,.. kYb khiE jd N Nf!?y WGpQf[3 :.y , 7' m3,p2p[.Qf..%v.N N;V[Ds.x m., g t .Q%iy ym . ,
,1:% j.e Q.p .y yi !
Q7.p.2m$;:h3. ; s. h 1. gOY $ y: p.L ".3 &.k.i;l. ' .Q y.jl ?ykfL.g.y. 3 s.+. pj.:7bQ1:l3Yi;)b s.: ye.O b .v<y% '. w. : o: ,,q,.g.s.,.p. b
. . m.y....+
w 4.yy.y. s ,:m ".yu.. .s c.q. , meLen . .g.g n ,_...m.; m. v.yp. p .ygs . t :p y.n; q v.sy. .y;e an a& t m:y > s.z. 1 c u m.k u .y n-V ~ h:..; a. .. -); , > n. : w :;V ,. n>e. . . ww s +- 4
- w. rv' y e.w : ~,,. i Y : ik .k l h f&j. .
?.h :
%. 5:%@6g$.h.0lfk f']$ W % M g &; g % @h,.#l@
'qwgg @g g ygggggp ,/
/
/
W e
'- .--____.___1--- 1-' "2.-' - --
-.- - . ~ . - . . _.. . . - . . . ' .f i hb1 .
e
\
, _ /.'.x f -
~
=
f 0 W b@* 5 9 b Rg,. '. \c <.bo. E- h L y i i I s A'en tin. Catecery: Electrical:and Instrume tation 5, Ele trical N
-In..::.-fe-cance Report (NCR) Activities AQE-25', AQE-33, U N stion Number: AQE-1, AQE-2, AQE-3, AQE-4, -
, f
-3 AQE-35, AQE-37,.AQE-38, AQE-40, AQE-41, AQE-42, AQE-45, AQE-47, '
1
, AE-24, and parts of AE-22, AE-27, AQE-12, AQE-36 and AE-50. ,
1 Characterization: :It is alleged that the validity of the generation and disp::sition of electrical nonconformance reports (NCRs) was suspect. 5iM T . I
'NsessmentofSafetySionificance: The implied safety significance of thess allegations is that the quality of the electrical installation C
p uit be indeterminate. These allegations pertain to various concerns involving the i;CR program, i and include: i
' p -
ent "use-as-is" dispositions of NCRs (AQE-33, AQE-47, E-34, AQE-35, Parts of AE-27 and AQE-36).
, J 5
The TRT interviewed a TUEC electrical engineer and a lead quality engi- ~
- neer (Q bout the "use-as-is" disposition of electrical NCRs (AQE-33,
. ,AQE-47, AQE-35 a.nd' parts of AE-27, and AQE-36). The' TRT .de.te r-mined that for an NCR to receive a "use-as-is" disposition, an independent
- verification inspection by an electrical engineer had to be made for each ; reported item 'of nonconformance. Based.on that inspection, and on an j evaluation with regard to procedures, specifications, drawings (including ' applicable codes and standards), and other related documentation, a "use-as-is" disposition could be applied. Fi .al approval of. s'uch a disposition required two QE signatures. The TRT also reviewed the 75 NCRs to determine if there were any with the disposition "use-as-is" with the explanation "not addressed in ES-100," as alleged. The TUEC engineer
- also indicated that should an NCR be received with this type of dispost-tion, it would be " kicked back" and would require more justification.
The TRT determined that if the nonconformance indeed ~was not. addressed in ' gg . 7 ES-100, then a document, such as a procedure er other specificatins, that did address this nonconformance item would be required to be refer - enced in the NCR. Of the 75 NCRs examined, tFs TRT could ident.ifv no dM 7"use-as-is" dispositions which deviated frcc a:plicable design re .f re-L ments, e>.:ect for those identified in Ele:trical and Instruir.entaWn - Category 1, " Electrical Cable Terminations,". and Electrical and Instru- ~ , tentation Category 2, " Electrical Cable Tray and conduit Installation," , regarding NCRs 1 2ntifying. bent terminal lugs Lin motor control centers (part of AQE-36), .and reporting two loose conduit. elbow fittings (part of -- AE-27),respectively. These .TRT findings were discussed with the lecers, ene. of whom disaareed.with the TRT_ findings as related to
- i .
'i If,E- r.d AQE-35 and provided additional infermation. The TR,T is. .- ', ,
o
' currently evaluating this new information arid will repo.rt.its ; findings'in
- a. supple ant'to.this SSER.
o . ,
* ^ * ~*
+ ,.
- ,p , * ,, , . ; '; * *
*:g, ,
.?
b - g
..s_ ; .,, , .. ,
g j s t .. ..~. - ' _ . d' *
$O N*t r vmc E;h g{ .*. 3 y. .g., ., , . ,,g, ,. , .
,4 [*
.,, 1
.i i _ g _.
l (\ I Q E ' M. ucMnD Conclusions and Staff Positions: Based on the reviews of the pertinent \ documentation, examinaticn of NCRs, and the information obtained from the ) interviews, the TRT concludes that adequate procedures, controls, and process checks exist for the generation and disposition cf reported items fof noncer-formance as related to the concerns raised by the above allegaticas. The TRT aise cencludes that of the allegations identified ; at the ou. set of this se::f oa, only a few specific instances were found which raised questions cor.cerning the adequacy of safety-related items. .f These are discussed above and are discussed further in other sections of i 35 t::.2 -7 the report. 7,. The results of this evaluation will be further assessed as part of the r overall programmatic review of al) NCRs addressed under QA/QC Category 5, "Nonconformance Reports," and under QA/QC Category 6, "QC Inspection." . zTherefore, the final ac:e:tability of this evalua-f on will be predicated
/ on the sa .isfac.ory res.it cf the overall programmatic review en these .
subjects. Any adjust s-:s to these conclusiens will be re;:ceted 5 a s:;;.pl a a- . .o - .i s SIE:.. -.-= -uults of the TF.T rs,iew cf r.e. t-for.a-tion con:erning allecatic . 34, AQE-35 and AQE-37 will also be ; reportec in a supplement to thi R.
./
/
Action Recuired: None. 6FE9.Ekl CE 1 ~ of,\A M. iii h.1 T k. ' f
. \, ,r 6., NCR Llo. Ee4-oo(o7% ' % /0 /s A , _. & duk
- 2. Lws. ' Ec. oo 2Psm b/ 6/e4_ hhuLc1
- s. % .sO\en q :f i d eeV. 2hdU ? ,uk O E '6 o,1 % 4' fp6 .
,Ty ._. - c 9 s-dw.--. R WA S A. ed St Ga A re e. r - c. 9 a 0 , i z.
Peu-% 6'7/83_ WW-r b 3. 0 di- Qwabm c. E --c r m (_s.1 2 ,
% -4
'A A. Mt o/u/
d.be- ~Lm s e - t o '7 , L- *_,5/u. RA&d. b g I . g, s = if
'J. c" . ,
w e.w, *= J
.v6- - 4 -
q E -tA n h, . .;' . e ')
?= m %) ETE."o 7 ,
C_.oMMt u} R Q,
'To had e_
'g
\M 3\scoA
..o(_.,dwiud inskkka.,4m.o_frcEnm 9, corn n a c td c4 Ca d k- v-w ~T 1 'A G A.C. E ot 0 t h Q 00.N m W Y._0L ,
\a% n d h<.n 632,'asg2c.b.d 99(a... (.o ,k 3ise 0]-
v<s . .. O a. w ., 5.2.cel C4 Y 4 O c@c6 -i-- Yr+o.bvUd hM hA h e t n. Y-<.=0 v 4 S-) , Na. O.~<_ ud$ UCf E J - oo V7 h '&es4 6 s 6J. a.Ms Ivhts$rs 6. shIrv'5 " u. s.2.4. a.s is '} Men s noI
'I'vu. n b ( M U E. C_. k w r<. s. A sfe ,_N N e.s c l w s d_. ct.b_MM, o., .a w g 4 .
Y cxAAJ-c \E % csv\ m cO.z m,
%Yr.- --%)-LO n
; y, 8 JcJ . ks .dl Lei, -
% i .
YM N CX ,. W 6( 6 \ n o. ct,T1l' \v1
@ I M4 k \^C bto n o b S_t r M d(.,
k h d etx b C.et,t O b d N Ab e.d vwa 'n b.lw c/
-b -- A ~ 4 A D 9v S us,A '
h w vwet#4- 1 3 i sC J- wo 's.t-evk W 0% v \. G w.G W O,b w vs., , henk (A M. 4.Y c.a % cs .e-N-Is'w ora.,ev.n. sin Y,
'b 0c.k O'm c 0 N SCh Ye , /
- i 03 Sr '
Yn crih N t n S b w v.wf4 d (AA.$Lu. a, c vjct., e l (.A.c. tvi, . k b -4 V M srdau.T vn (Alt-f 'c E . t.A./. % 'Mh c.,e v i M k hL' M M v-4 , cdd.tcM - wct_S .C</n.ctvd e ck
,i* rp .
h 3 J.' .-
\ g.,sp b g- 4-*
g,
- ,+
.., ,,, , g
* ' s,.
y tt v ^ VJ is c O 'r %v n.) \h4 e f .. ft W vM av MW 7 'J N
\M -.-x 7% '<*.Ag y'_ (
m mb .c,v_ . . a4. cn s
\e w,A .-mm .c wm mm:
Os c = i: _ Ma wn'Acu.+hAe pm w bc.m v-c~ m t.L.wb} 3 ek
\E C b aYU'
.\ Yc -:s : e. c t. %
(p.ss.co)A h k S ecs.g3 v s gay.A t - n . . , 1 mms, i 'r{s.O A A. t r e c . c. c, -- d -t,.-Ov e.My \kt. ChA 't- P u-( h ss. ee g,4.<w. e a b g.a v .C.~ -.!_, w's t cuc. Li u ' E q, v _ c, ,, e s an O m*#-ed I hIo Wc..e-(Ie.u m m a 6) .9InL.v.L A JA
-%. 6Q1A\
m w < . , _ Y 2. N cene0a.ch Yh.cJt c,m L a&<Mo4.4 A %at) c a n a '2 f'T Js(a era a.a,we ' 4 J+c L \'n. s cf A m 't t-- 1 m cSG&-e.3,s 5 % y eA .k4&
% tm c m N.cc vac d ec a.s n.0cvkb
-%. JAas - ~ ~ ,
DM t-cLc&h 4\v.s _\ \r.-\ s C q po ,,t u n ck,t. g c .g,,,, 4'-d b 5 tA b 5 - vth.hk \'% k at LA g g 3 _,,,_ - m 6vk mmcC, s b4 w%c (,b cm yb.cs c% - cQ J
~
e%- -th w 4 s V1sv.d ewsm % Aa, . oIs LhUu cit W to O ah
'9am&c&
6 q w m e. wap. ms W , u&. 2 , A -e $ c d - V .
. 9 6
, p
.es- .s*,- . s b.% % k%e' me .. ..e-
i/y/s{ i 4
~
- 4 &~
hQ(.-34(r_m.Mwbd.)._ . l In w rk A % m LA W ie saa t . s wwa0 L 6. w~ EEL;% B v R. c.w&4-pre-c e &u a no. c. t te M 0, it G wua. v)un en L cpay tuJ. is .n w(qd re?, i acQ > d h!%
%. sto
( uR bvt. ~~kw J eo-4 %e -t o- ts tw sn -e o w cC
\N qAa tvuvv%[hm'( . % LO W d \
gy Cev =c w ~BT.s em ge n.d. (~
*1 i
l r l l . l e [_ _ , .a . . .....p._
, . . : .. s.. . ....,..s.. . . . . . .,m.
.g __. !
.w C. n a :1 h - W L Q > G. ' D ' ', , '
w m h 4 Tiv. '6 5 ' I u < d 5 , S 54 7 U EC., 3 bveks ck ' N ci b M c.i LeS & rrr W %Q u.u<^ 0er bwtci cuk O% ok v ' kiO V t d-u vn_t e4 >A
\w' Ns.t.
L m s Ldli.uQ 1 4dn . ~ In wd bdi (t'b c>-k e A L t. b c c.a tdtg GLct.<.k ,W -tk yvt.r.h( s.Acm Mf AA gw s 6J.Lc0 , dm -- - ) s C-p n rt g_ (
- z. & ynn sNS y M Lt Q $uvU m;m & a w . 4 s i s e_ 4 o%.v-js geW '
Y k o m, . MV % WDcDU.S( h 's e-(~ %[L fn (C-< Y s e ank,hhtd M , h un y-<.m.<r 4. b i c.m L 8. ll ' 1 ,d%ca h L[.A. a
$a.mcr.oLh
- n C.k%k %Y %r' ~
%*. & je eL
. c _.....
Q'..~ !
. . . . .~. . , . . , . ,
iExAS Ur:titiEs GENEr:AT:NG CO.
@**E Sk NM RES WN lNCRNa NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR)
E r a - S VA 7 3 r A T T .T/d/ D Vrt-- l us:T STRUCTURE / SYSTEM i tTEM/ COMPONENT l TAG /iD NUMBER LOCATION_OR _ ELEVAT!CN _ RtR NO
' cys5 y srat woma ,g"#' \
/ f.yy / ,yg esg;g5 sod' f .n c. g32 MM '
NONCONFORMING CONoiTsON Ctaf7 W45FOUND USMG b'nu- THAERp Rog 7/R/MM Ct;/TASVSIf/7/pH SERh AMD AS l _, A M-BM 70 4t7sfH C4845 /N Csw&YR7/2MX Slfffs. En0UGHF#fCi" Was///j/ED 70 RLL-7#ffnD DUR/MG FROCESC Of Affsin/MG CfftfS 7/* CAusfROD TOB&rD. llWHEN BA.-IstfdD Wo.SffAdr47 F/M 9EBC SCO7CH 8 l WHKJ WAS R/oCD 064 h ALL-T#srso /690 Toff 4Wsr F/dn foo E2?BS'kG 7/95/95 D 7))t'/f7QFCJf)[S. CJBtES e MJr Mat!C S/J857//#fD HM /NDfffffHf7E //t?uMT Cf D/MME LXJE 79 TH/s PJ/ctSS,
$ pyGf WOULDMT BE VIS/B)f DUKING T#r AE/kSP/CT/0#Est PfvfMr/osHaEAS.
C w
&)$$ /$ $$ $$5 /N YNS W$ $$?? $/0/ $$$fl5 W$ $0I"$f ?ll 7/]fNf C
k lbl?/N40 IA$$$5Nf0
, REFERENCE DOCUMENT
- b~//8 PEV I PARA 8, 7 REPORTED BY:
l DATE:
, M l $ I)7/$$$
l OE REVIEW / APPROVAL:
\
J.[MkblY'shww j y DATE:
.$ / A$/ b ACTION AOCRESsEE / OEPARTMENT
. 88 Al ktur farf fdleE cisPCsiTiON:
REWORK REPAll3 USE AS IS II SCRAP A visual inspection was made on the cables in the conduits in question. m While minor, superficial damages to the cable jackets was observed, w there were not any signs of excessive stress or any major unacceptable m' damage to the cables. The cables in question may be used as is. g QA RECORD RTN.I QA REVIEW 2 i. es3-6.M o p o ( hRN rite No.
/.:(/
aC
/}Dg_-
se _8UEsFILE NO. 3-e-sa n l """ git *'*"" "^' 03 REVIEW AP
# burA INFORMATION ! 3,'a: w
=
f1 F , o O g C?SPOSiTION V'ERIFPCATION &'CLOSURf: ' W ' V eM* 'd* DATE: l
- W 2 unw -~~ne 2 /$, /W t
, COMMENTS: I I I\ V '
l ~ l . 1
',c ' *
. . - m. -
\
~
- asancus: P. D M -- sTrau c.Ec Ric '
/
s 27:en
%===== .ap /-
INSPECTICN PEPCRT an, aucamn +;c_f.cc;oyaf I pa gus . m .=,
<*1 m /rt*Mt S O.co.cmr.r.~<
7Mszwm 1o.7r , ass 1Dosur WOf22G
- u. ,c.
ge. u. :ac. s an,. a cwm n n s . w s w w . r. FS-/06bm.d ., 4/-4Y-N T ?C Brtn , M/ .. Oin==ecen asm .ca c pnswe.me =snu m. en Q paamac rau=c== cf==. =ce- en c p= we en u-msP. AE3ML.73 - C =me m c=wum , n - nas armer == & o cpf,f _v.#w i g_ _, _ , _ _ _ .
. ,.= .
ur.
,e im =
wearect:en atTatsures ; $ urr ,,.* ,lw m-
!I , ; J 189 BG DiestW/#m* Ma r#t t%c;rs a &Brnal <l I i isAFRF/MroAtcis l l l l
- i i Ii I 19 Nur? 7MG RMn. rIi i
- I ~
I liI I i I I III I I ii I I I i l I i l l I I
- , I I ii I I
' I II l I i -
~_ l ~l I i
1 IMrn bl . -T. , I
- I
"" M9sM llVN l
#1 7%IWw , I N _k !.'.)l M V l l l- -
! I
- v4 1 .1L l j l l o ndu r i 1 i
"( JA v i j j i ~
I l il i r I I ll l ~~ I i i.
'l l l l l t.
nwaaics %u.cs. c u e
= n: ca = m- , =rs +8
$$'Wh U q ,*m .- . -
JV
- Nh 5 ,mm.. GC " .NEF*.C;n .g i
~&.v ie. J. 6 3 -
i yo h,._ _ 0s e
- i:
e
* ,o i.-
. . . , ) ..
, ~
6
,w --,- e ,m-- , -r- ,-yw_w- - - - , ---r+---rm. ..-,_--.e8.~ - '
l e 1 32CWN & ' EDOT. INC. F5tOCEDU12 ' EFFICTIVE * ! CFSES NUMBER RZYISICN DATZ PAGE l 2 , CI-CPM 6.12 4 10/24/84 1 of 4 TITLE: oRIcntAtot 'N /4-f8-M ! V Data NO
~ ~
ARE RELEASE FOR ggyyggga gy; $- pe FENETRATION SEALS - CPPE A m REMOVA1,OF THE ** I" ITIOY :
l'** G 'IA*****
hh*)h _(ap)2afh To0eo ai me sFF ,a m Dr d wzsaa waaimmirLON F50 JECT MG1 /Date !l - c.i TABLE OF Umsest5 i
1.0 REFERENCES
2.0 _ GENERAL i 2.1 FURPOSE 2.2 SCOPE
! 2. 3 RESPONSIBILITY '
j 2.4 DEFINITIONS [ . 3.0 PROCEDURE -
, 4.0 RELEASE FOR HIGE DENSITY SEALS l
1.0 REFERENCES
i 1.1 TU5I contract CP-0707 1.2 Boom Schedule for'Peantration Seals or Room Tarnover Schedule l 1.3 Item Removal notice Procedure CF-CFM 6.10. i 4 2.0 GENERAL o
. 2.1 FURPOSE This procedure establishes the methods and controls for*aotifi-catica to.the various jobeite organimatione for release of rooms and/or areas for penetrati'n o sealing. and control of the seismic
- say (air space betuman beildings.) ,
4 h
. l
. 9 .. Oa 4 , . .
by
;. ^.:
j ; ;- -; ~ - - - -
. .. c j .gr g 8
, , - - - - - - , - , , , - , v,,..-- .-,-m -a , , - , , - , ,-w a.. s. , , - - , . . ...-n-+.,1 .~ . ,,'%+..--- h----
a- , s
. I l.,
- 1 3RWN 6 -200f, INC. - Pt0C:0022 .' '
c I??ICTIVE CPSES NUMBE2 XE7'SICI D/JZ Pact JOB 35-1195 CI-CPM 6.12 4 10/24/84 2 of 4 2.2 SCDFE 2 This procedere shall apply to the notification of the schedoled date for lasta11ation of penetration seals on a room by room basis in accordance with Reference 1.2 and release of the roem . and/or area for the penetration seal contractor to perform actual sealing activities in accordance with Referenen 1.1. 4 2.3 RR$PONSIBILITY The Building Department shall be responsible for installing. 1 removing and mahtaining temporary seals or temporary flashings as discussed in paragraph 3.1 and for installing, removing and meintaining temporary and permanent flashings as discussed in ] . paragraph 5.0. ! The Area Management Croup la responsibis for scheduling i and notification of relamee of rooms and/or areas to the Procurement Management Croup. } . The Penetration Seal Contractor is responsible for actual analing of i 4 the, penetrations in accordance with Refernace 1.1. i j The Production Control Croup is responsible for the statuoing of com-plated penetration seals. 4 The Procurement Management Croup is raisponsible for the coordination
- i and overall annagement and/or administration of the penetration seal
{ contractor. 2.4 DEFINITIONS l I 2.4.1 Area Manaaement Group The organisation d ich scheidules, releasea rooms and/or areas for penetration seal oork. i 2. 4'. 2 Puestration Seal Contractor. . The organization dich performs the actual. installation of penetration seals in accordance with Reference 1.1. , l 2.4.3 Production' Control Croup l The organisatica dich statuses the completion of penetretion seal '
, work.
i i . .
- __ = .
NW . ] .' . . *
.---.--- - . . - - q ., .----~-.;*.~..-s .
,. ,, h . Y.
>
- p .. - .
. .,, +
l
,, _g , g L. ,. ) . -+ - + % -* - ~ 'eI--*- --' ' ' * ' '~#"' ~ ~ " ~ "#
r
- i. I
~
- s BROUN & ROOF, INC.- PROCEDURE EFFECTIVF.
j CF5ES NUMagt REV31(El DATE PACF. i Jos 35-1195 c1-cru 6.12 4 10/24/84 3 of 4 4 2.4.4 Procurement Massaament Group t The organisation which coordinates sad performs the overall manage- { l aent and/or aa=*=iatration of the penetration seal contractor. i 2.4.3 Seismic Cap Flashiam . Seismic gap flashing is barrier meterial, suc'h se sheet metal, which seals the space between buildings and prevents the entrance of foreign objects. Such flashings are used on the roof, in doorumys, and any other openinge not sealed with Bisco seale. Bisco seals are not considered as satanic gap flashlage. i 3.0 PROCEDt!RE 3.1 Penetrations between buildings shall be kept la a state which will pavent items from being placed through tham'which could + becnee trapped between the a lle. R osa penetrations shall be i sealed with the pernament seals, or protected by temporary l seals or flashings which could not become dislodged and bo , trapped between the ?suildings' walls. a'
- 3.2
- The-Area Management Group shall notify the appropriate tagineertag and craft persommel two (2) weeks prior to the scheduled date for !
- penetration seal work within . rooms and/or areas. Copies of the *
- approved contractor's field survey drawings shall be forwarded to the craft and the discipline engineers. *
, 3.3
! Each discipline superintendant shall perform all outstanding work within the roans and/or areas for penetrations requiring seats. Each discipline superintendent (Piping, Electrical, lastrumentation, ; i M111 wright) oball determine that all penetrating items are installed in accordance with approved design deciaments and/or design chsages. 3.4 Bach disciplina Engineer shh11 determine that the design for pene- . trating items is complete, and notify the Area Management Group of ! any incomplete designs that could affect the penetration,seeling work. . ' 3.5 he' Area Management Croep coornisates work for reselbtion.of any unsatisfactory items and reques.ta final QC inspection (excludlag electrical) prior to sealing. .
- 3. 6' ne Area Management Croup shall identify aresa ready for penetration seals to the Procurement Namagement Group.
3.7 . na Procurement Management Group shall direct the penetration seal contractor to proceed with actual seal installation la accordance with Beforence 1.1. . M..------ "r __
. . . _ _ . . . . . . .. ..~.-.----..l--. - - - - ~
- - * - - - * ~ '
ll '
\y 1: * . , .. [G
.1 l --_- - .-.--.-. .
- . ~ . .- . .
_-- . ~ _ _ . . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
, i i
d t l-
~
1 32 cur i accr, c c. .m = _ n - 1 l .m;: 3..= ;z CFSES ' - " " ' I "YIIICI ?.Vll3
! I Jos 35-1195 CI-CP!f 6.12 4 10/24/54 4 of 4 3.8 Men B&R removes a penet:.atias seal or any other seal or flashings s
between buildings, an 12N ens 11 be prepared prior to the resioval and presamted to TUc00 y la sipature. (C's signature o'c.all be authorisation to remove tM itse. The 3o11 ding Department shall provide temporary protective saaouras for an unsealed remetration . which will be lef t unattended by QC. The I1N shall be forwarded .
- to Area Managemeet. ,
Wes 31aco removes a penettstion seal, 31aco QC shall perform the necessary inspections in accordance with $1sco procedures. + 3.9 he seals may be removed by the craf t only if the entire seal is regired to be removed. If only a partial removal is necessary. Bisco shall be contacted to make the partial removal. 4.0 arr* = POR BIGs DENSITY SEALS
- 4.1 The release of penetrations 41ch receive high denalty astia shall l be as described above. Additionally, the Release for Penetration Sealias (Attachment 1) form shall be completed prior to the place-l anat of the seals.
~
- The form shall be initiated by PMt. and submitted to Area Manage-1 meat for routing to the organizations ..E,.rafh h *or signing the
- fome., Af ter completion of the form, Area Management shall return the c'mpleted e form to FMG who any then 'authorise the oesling cif i
the penetration., ' 5.0 REMOVAL OF 5_gISIIC CAF FLASHIE]. A traveler. (see exemple la Attachment 2) ehell be prepared and presented to haco QC for signature before ransval of any portion of the soianic gap flashias; QC's signature on the traveler shall be authorisation to remove the flashing. Cars shall be taken not to allow any debria to fall into the asp, and the Say shall not be left unattended unlese protected by a tsunporary cover. If debris which cannot{be hatrieved and, removed does fall ' into the sep, ' notify QC eo that the proper.tigineering evaluation can.be performed and documented. - Prior to reinstallation of the permement flashing, haco qc shall . perform and ' document sa inspection in accordenen with QC procedures.
. L "_w- _
. _.,.. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ..~./.'.-....
-__..f... . +
, , *t i_ ,, ,
- E., * *
.s s' '
g ,
. ~ , . . ' -
g h a W b 4 y i; ,_ _ --
, e
~ 7.ACIN ' & 2007. INC. PROCEDmtZ ZFFECTIVE CPSES NUMBER 2EVISICN DATE PAGE
.108 35-1195 CI-CPN 6.12 4 10/24/84 1 of 1 l s ATTACEMElfT 1 REIZASE TCR HIGE IENSTIY FENETRATION SEAIS i
en tatt FOt NISO ODEITY PEETRATIDW SfAL3 a m as./Arne O SISCD Dreefag me.(s) Pometrettenme.(s)_
. The penetretten(s) tdantiffed shove have been eveleeted and are released for seeltag. (hqy exceptions should be Itsted by Penetretion As. In space ;rovfded.)
Stensture Date Enceptions l IIschestcal Engineering Destrical Eng'ineering lastrismantatten Engineering
~
-e n kgu smeret Macnee1 cal Seerintendent. .
gp Emeral Civil Sueerintendast 5
\
Eeuwel Electrical Superintendent teetrwentatten Sneerintendent I koms & Reet S (ASME) x ' cer46 ate vith QI-QAP-11.1-26 To be.*eleased 1a 1URED @ (Rep.ASE) ItEED QL Electrical - l ,7UND M Instnmentation After stonetwo. reste to the meet efutp1tne. . uses esaplettee of this rolesse. Perward to the .% __ t miemponent'Woug.
. l 1
1 i
. l 1
W
.~..
1 l***....t.*...*.s..,
) .*i..* .
i y' y . g
. m..s.
p y ~
1 1 1 I. namn s moor. Inc. Paos Dons . rrrscrIva CPSES NUNEER REVISIM DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 l CI-CPM 6.12 4 10/24/84 ; eg 1 i ATTACEMENT 2 m - vs ... (D ==*=
- KD- * @'"'
- e = "r'KDam .
ga. -rm. e === = - (rj . ._m ssm. gumsnm gus sm
.m .m asa w=- sers a _ _ orr
=n e r ,e t e et - me.t.
.- w ei n e.er . ,r.e. 3. fore 6 i s e4
- - . *:j5 ,
g.. . a.,we g Namager
- Date 2 Cemet , Basify (N.of the L M==
esal/fleshias r e l 9: .
.c .
!3 Dueet nameos the te.1/fNi'6-gg m , ..
I
.4- Demet Wicomme ve 5 act' irietas ids (1e penetratime/.ep are opea.
3 COQ If eMbria esterie tlse, aidrCe gap, estify the t)mality EnvImmortag Lead, for* festber aetism , S :eest : Install /remmes, temper' e ry.proteettee maaeures se regstred gy . . . . ..
.- teruf i
. . , t OCOO
. , _ .t
.m I
. 1
. A.'. ._.
....ll"",*.
**T..*.** ... ** " " * * * * ' ' ' * * * * * " " * * *
, , e * '
- r v
.t-r..
!. s -
~
O
- p
-- - - + -e -+ r w.. . - a,. <s-- - , ,e,, *-+.< ,-m-
bur . ,, Te. 15 *
' f J'- . . .
l ,
- these lothe'r areas ,- b'ut at least-in.the electrical area se
'l .
'v ,
h ' 2 j think it's okay at this point. Any other suggestions on i . 3 i that that you could offer us, or can we go on to another? { 4 Let's go on. 5 MR. WESSMAN: Okay. Let's go on. Do you want to do 6 34? This is AQE34 and 'this was the one concerning cable 9c. 7 damage on the Bisco seals. Before he starts, let me point S out t. hat if you think we're missing the target, you've got 9 to tell us because.we're doing our best. If you have a 10 specific example and you think we're wrong, you're our best , 11 helpa5thispoint. We've done our best; we've looked as 12 hard as we can; we've taken what we think are reasonable , 13 samples; we've obviously talked to folks out there, both 14 management folks and craf t folks, and we've done our best ] 15 to see what we can find. *] 16 Okay. Go ahead with 34. Q k- N i i
~ 17 MR. JOHNSON: With, respect to. the Bisco seal removal, i 15 - using a threaded rod, occurring in Aux Building, Elevation ;
I 832, where it's alleged that the insulation was scraped off~ I 19 ; I i
! 20 by the rod, and further evaluation may be in order for these .
j 21 cables and similar problems could be elsewhere, our TRT s t staff examined the NCR books and selected a random sample i, 92 f NCR's pertaining to this nature of allegation, and they { 23 determined that the allegations for rework of the terminal , Q t
~
blocks and the repairing of a solenoid in an unauthorized 3
* 'I
... 3.
y ,- .
<. ... ?.:
,, ., +. . . . . . . , , ,, ,, e,
* ~' '
. . ,~et, , ,
- - , .: e.w 3g+: :.m-mn.: w+sm wN~ w. As .w n * < - N+ve Na* >""^r^" v"" - -
~_--- --___ _
W. - t.l . , * - '
. j ,
" ' ~
pulling - o'f' cables without'. paper ters.and 'the- cd;is da age
'I-C. 2 I e
'from the re= oval'of a Bisco fea- ~ ' fire-re:arfe..:.catarisi 3 in the Aux Building, they felt that that didn't prinarily I 1
4 contribute to anything of safety significance. The review i
\
5 of these NCR's couldn't identify.any 4.nconsistencies or k
\
6 It I defiqiencies. . . . that.,.w,ould . .., ., ,
- s. imply a. question of s'afety.
I 7 appears tha,t any .incozisi'stencies in the NCR's were insig- I t S nificant to the iss'ue of the removal of the Bisco .eal in
. 7, -
~
,.i. M ti ..t 9 pa'rticular. The revEetE'that.the TRT Team did was strictly i
. . "I
, a, , fe a paper review in this case. That was the allegation or 0 10 4a 11 concern that you had. .
12 MR. WESSMAN: Help us out a little on this one, if you
.i 13 can. I think we weren't successful in pinning anything 14 8Pecific down on the Bisco seal, at least as far as we.can
. ~
,I p tell on the sample of the NCR's; and this kind of relates l
?
16 to the issue on the Bisco seal, and I think, it relates 'to i - i E 17 another one that you raised concerning solenoid work without ! paperwork and the work on termination blocks. It really.
.g 33 i 19 relates to about three issues that you raised.
We haven't .
- \,
i - - - 3 20 been ables. to pin anything down. -- - ' J MR. JOHNSON: It was the modification of the-solenoid a 21 1 g and the terminal blocks and the repair that was being done
. 23 th'at we believe that was of your concern, but I think .the -
~,
question is quite appropriate. Did you .have other areas - O 25 ther than this one that you have cited, . be'cause ycu h-
* " I'- '
, !- ( ' *
* * ' q ,. ?, ,
+',f, '
,,'s.
.n . . . . , . . -
.. 9-.. , ;. .
- +
,,., , , , , .; .'~< .
h- -
.. ' e,
..**. . r,' .
v.,
=
. . *r <
e . * '
, .. l a
, . . .m.,,,,,w. s .- - w.s. . ~ v~ ~. . ~. .~. , .n . ,m s ,. .,w . . ,..ss,.,..
_s..: . .. pw_. c s ..!c. . e. ,+ <o ;
- . i7 i ' ec.tioned'in your c'ilegation rhat si=ilar.prebic=s' nay ba- '
I
~
.- . . . . . i
{.; ,
~
3 elsewhere. Was that speculative on your part?. j Could we go e if the record just a minute? 3l 4 (A discussion was held off the record.)
.' . , ... . ., s ,. . .. . . . '
5 .
.MR.0 WESSMAN,5 . . s
.Let's go back on the record and let me
* . ..... ..,,s, -
1
'summarizEwhds .we 'werA~ talking about a little bit while we 6 !
g 7 were Toff the 'recordC r; want to clarify one aspect, specif- 16
;. . . r .... -.'
S ically regarding; Bisco seals. We also want to clarify that ,. li*" 9 the general discussion involved several of the concerns
]# s.
KQ(,s", 10 raised by We started talking on AQE34. The pdj g3 general discussion we're covering really relates to AQE34, b] e g 12 AQE35, whic'h" concerns NCR's concerning traceability'of l 13 ter:r.inal blocks; AQE37, which concerns paperwork conflict i 14 regarding terminal blocks; and AQE38, which concerns repair of solenoids without paperwork. la f na se cases & Unal result of G o TRT . 16 i g 37 inspection effort,after examining a sample of NCR's in this g 3g,, general area, I think can be summarized as we really couldn't
- - - l
; gg find anything that was really wrong with the work on the v
terminal blocks, the work on the Bisco seal, or the repair , a g
? .
E of the solenoids; and to the best of our knowledge, the I
. t 21 .
t corrective action system on these components is working as i 22 5 was intended by both the NRC and the applicant.
'3 e
Now, also while we were -off the record we talked about an IE Information Notice, IE Notice No. 84-47. This IE l 23 ..
* . . t
[ $ 9 , ." . *# *
~ ,,,
' P.
- 5 f . . . .,
5
- s-
- = . -
4.- u. ~. . :..w. a ,.........-,n, . e.ae...,e. . .n g.88, ...:. u. ....g..~.s .~.- ~. A~.r~.~~ ~ ~ ~ * *
. - ...~....~, .. ~ .~ ~.
1 3
. Notice 'is' entitled "Envir'onmential Qualificatica Test in
~
1 h 2 ;- riectrical Terminal Blocks". In.part, the issues raised by i j l 3 at Coman'che Peak resulted in enough evaluation 4 by the NRC sEaff thati we felt additional information to the 5 industry regarding, terminal blocks was appropriate and was d
.. '< . 4
~.
.*4._ =
6 issued.a's part of this IE Notice. I
'Now',iwhile N se'reIoff the record, we also discussed i 7
\
S the details of Bisco seals. If you would, tell us, T'c 9 since we didn't find the specific Bisco seal of interest, . 10 what else we could look at to help research th.e problem with 11 the Bisco seals a little more clearly. 12 To give you an idea of what I ran acrosa at the time of the discovery of this particular situation, g 13 14 there'is another inspector, and myself, which we 15 were assigned to th 16 and we were inspecting cable tray covers at the time. We 1 E 17 happened to notice that some cable pullers were trying to
^
obtain some more slack in scne cables that were cominy [ IS b I 19 . through a floor penetration or conduit. The conduit itself Y ! was filled to the maximum to where she could barely get the 20 all-threaded rod which they were using down and the conduit h 21 i ' to clear the Bisco scal, to break it.' loose to where they I 23 could free the cables. MR. WESSMAN: I'm sorry. What kind of. rod was it again?
,, 3 It Wa3 a piece of all-threaded rod.
5
- v. .
K...'.
. , . - c- .
m. i s . j ao % Qs; s y n L'P,* , gss o.N&,* g..... .a.
* ,e %?g g ,
.s
.g .. . .
~ y.P.. WEssxAN: All-th'rea'd rod?
? ' Yes, sir. I ,'
3 ; M.R. WESSMAN:':Oka.y. ,Go ahead. .l
, . 3 4
;There was.another inspector involved also.
5 f His'name was which h'e was in the Control Group.
,3 g
7 7p.. 6 'ME. $ SSMAN '
! .I believe'so; I'm not really sure of the i
S spelling or any other part of his name. We believed that he 9 was watching these people that were working on these cables 10 as far as trying to obtain slack. So and myself, we 11 didn't.really say anything until we saw then using the all- '.i I 12 thread rod. They had placed Scotch 33 tape on the all-thread g 13 rod while they had it down inside the sleeve, and when they I . 14 pulled it out at this point and period in time, the all . 15 thread rod was bent due to the force of applying pressure. , I 16 on the rod to try and free the cables, to break them loose. i The all-thread rod was down inside the sleeve approximately
! 17 I
i is maybe a foot, and at that point and period of time and 19 I, we asked if he was watching this operation and he {= i Come to find out, the craft
~! 20 said no, he thought we were.
a had no OC witness as f ar as the operation that was performed.
!t 21 When they brought, the all-thread rod back out of- the sleeve,
, initially the rod was stuck. When it did free the rod and 3l 1
, i reroved it from the sleeve, the Scotch 33 was hanging'off
_3a of the all-thread, exposing the thread which was down inside '
\ .
e,- - . . .. .. .
- 7. . ,
- , y -
'u .~. .
e 4 "*.%t t +4d,p'M YM ?
20. I
} l t'
the conduit sleeve. j'
% ' , , f This raised concern as f ar as to what extent cable l369 3 damage had taken place as far as inside the sleeve. The 4 cable itself was all B-train. The disposition of what we 5 heard was going to be coming out on the NCR was that they 6 were going to determ all the cables and fill the sleeve with I water and megger all the cables.
S P.R. hESS1'.AN : Determ; you mean determinate? - ri i c. 9 Right; determinate all the cables, and 10 perform a megger test en all the cables with the sleeve filled 11 with water. Now, this was to our initial understanding of 12 what was going to',take place on the NCR. Instead, the NCR, the next time we saw it, was a use-as-is d'ispositien. We g, 13 , 14 heard it was due to the fact of rework. It was in discussion; 15 through management for approximately two to three days as 16 far .as our supervision over this NCR. Also, on the dispo-
! 17 sition, the way it was worded when it came back on the NCR, i IS was visual inspection of cables in sleeve, only showed 2
19 minor jacket indentation from the all-thread rod. I know i
$ 20 for a fact cryself I can't see down inside that conduit sleeve
$ That rod was down 21 for more than maybe three or four inches.
there in excess cf a foot, or a foot, in excess. By the 22 23 , time Engineering tried to locate the all-thread rod, the
,34
! craft had straightened it, so we no longer had a bent rod.
'G 25 Also, it was taped up with duct tape at that time, by the .
a
.~
- ,, . . . . ;_ ,- l _' ; . , ,
. r.; ,-
- , 1 3 -
o j s ?.} g
- 5 ', . , ' 4 W- '*f tY Yg8 g
___ . _ _ _ l
..N
~
.c 21
- e. . ,
3 time Engineering saw:it. lSof more or less the _ craf t had 3
-@ 2 j undone what they.had done as far as what we'had.as evidence. \j 3 t We. should have corifiscate'd the all-thread rod at that time. -
4 I felt very uneasy as far as the disposition on that par-5 ticular NCR.. 6 MR. WESSMAN: Do you recall the NCR number?. " 7- ' No, sir. I can obtain the number, and.I yi S will give it to you. N cR.* (64 - oo (j ~l$ s 9 MR. WESSMAN: Okay. I will ask that'you call us on i to that in a couple of days and give us that number so we can 11 pursue it. About what time did this occur? Last su:=ner? NN 12 Tes,. sir. It was this past . 13 Actually, I'd say around January, maybe TEbr4ary. .<b
/ .
14 MR. WESSMAN: ' February 1984 ? { 15 Yes, sir. 16 MR. WESSMAN: Ycu said it '.ts: On the S train, and I i , j 37 believe your original concern said it occurred in the [ IS Auxiliary Building on 832-foot elevation; is that correct? l 39 Yes, sir.
! ,0 MR. WESSMAN: Do you know what system or component was '
I j 21 inv lved? ' s No, sir, I don ' t.
- ma.Y 23
' *
- Y" "" ""I y '
~
they were using all-thread rods in this manner to where - ,h ~ ables night have been damagedir 5 i I
.. .\
[ l .
, . . e. '
+
,. ..,e....... ......v. w... .x. sh r- :..w . .r. , . .w . ,;m . < - s
- a. . .,
. . 42' l I i
. i
;Q
*equirement. in the pro'esdure as f ar as what the craf t was !
l 3 to use to remove the Bisco seals as far as rework on cables. f i 4 The foreman at that time, which I don't know his actual name; i 5 his nickname was ' was the electrical foreman over the 6 cable pullers. He said they had used all-thread rod in o'ther i 7 cases. Now, this is only word 'of-mouth; there's no way we. . S rea'ly know what happened. ./ . 9 MR. WESSMAN: You don't have any other specific 10 exa=ples. This one in' stance is the only one that you W : I It 11 actually saw. . . 12 Now what we were told later on is. that . 13 they were supposed to use a dowel pin, or just a wooden rod. GG , 4 14 Still, even to this day we have, to my knowledge, no require-15 ment as f ar as what they actually use in the removal of this , I. 16 Bisco seal. I j 17 MR. WESSMAN:' You don't know of any procedural require-i IS t.e . or any instructions? . 59 No, sir, not that I've seen, other than 5 20 just by the instruction of the foreman. 4 MR. WESSMAN: Okay. h 21 Like I said, 'I cant supply you with the information on the NCR.
- MR. WESSMAN: We'll get that from you later. I think j
,h -l yc .i've identified a specific area where we need to look more l , 3 , I V m lI \
- , - . b..,. L' '
.; j 1
, ,3 % or me.q 4 +N s S- s'sWs*N'\
- i p.*d.- lws m- s a .d -: .eg. 4', a . -
23 l- . 1 . and let us 'take: a look at what. the' NCR says , and wetll.make l l I
, -l -
i
-$ 2 i a decision and see what else we need to assess on. !
l 3 MR. JOHNSON: May I ask a few questions? 4 MR. WESSMAN: Sure; go ahead. P 5' MR. JOHNSON: you indicated' that this was" 6 i a floor.penetr'ation. , g 7.. . Ies, sir.
- i \
5- MR. JOHNSON: Was this--the penetration to the floor i 1
,3 N '
9 was overhead in..the Auxiliary Building or was it below?
/
10 Which way are we' going? . 11 Okay. On the 832 level it was below as 12 far as in th,e floor. It rises out of the floor approximately n
/ G.
13 six to seven inches. MR. JOHNSON: .This was not a cable pull; or was it? 14 [ 15 No, sir. They wer'e trying to obtain the 16 3 slack in the cable. i j 17 MR. JOHNSON: So there was no procedure to control? I IS - As far as what they were to use--as far
~
19 as what craft was to use to-- 3
! 20 MR. JOHNSON: --obtain slack.
W 11, n , t rem ve the Bisco seal, or 21 break it loose. - 22 23
! MR. JOHNSON: This operation or activity was primerily
,,4 i to break the Bisco scal?
Yes, sir. Bisco had come in and they 25.
. e
. , , . . ",.-* *,y , ,
~ ' ' '
* . a,
.l .
. * 'e '
- e. . , ,
**Et#5.**fth6lDjaI*W'l 7'NI' YI ' 'MN #
*- 'A *
*!' 86 6
q, , * * . 'g.' i- , 24 - , J . I filled the conduit sleeve. ' - 11 h 2 MR. JOHNSON: This is a fire protection type of media-- 3 Right.. I; 4 -
.MR. JOHNSON:
f--and'it's to bee cleaned ;' out, and after ' r :. ' l t 5 that was cleaned .out, then they would be able to go in 'and [. t ... j 6- ' dull' slack;intEe~Eable.. , . l P
' ~
7 Yes, sir. ' l
. S MR. JOHNSON: In pulling the sla'ck of the cable once 9' the Bisco seal was' removed, was'that activity governed by' procedure?
bk 10 . 11 Yes,. sir, it is. - -- 6 !
~2 1
MR. JOHNSON:- That's a hand-pull', 'isn 't it?. I f .. 13 Yes, sir. 14 MR. JOHNSON: Was there.any soaping involved? Cable 15 soaps. 16 To my knowledge now, I did not have any i 3- further involvement [ other than to work the NCR. I do know ! i
. IS - for a fact that af ter the NCR was written and our super- I f 39 vis' ion went to their meetings for the next few days, my
! 20 supervisor, which was at that time, ca=c back 21 and sat down across- ' desk was facing due at dat g time, okay? He sat down with a'nd this is a statement 23 that was.made out there pretty regularly.as far as, 'Okay,
,,4 you reported the incident"--which we did as far as the NCR-- k~
c - 25 "the re:ipensibility is taken off of you. It's in I 1 y --.. . ---- a
.~ . ; '. , ,, 'f .
" ' . d. .
,., . . e. ..* * ,
l_* ,, j, ,. & ds e e '= . ~ - -. 'e r
,,44, .a.&5.h.**= NW% 8 6 ^s'N**' % 4
[~ .
~ :25 i
1 ' Engineering's hands. Engi.ne'ering saw fit to justify.it
] 2 as.far as this being tr.e answer. You reported it; Engineering s 3 has taken responsibility for it; it's out of your hands. 'Do .: .4. you have any problem with it? aid no. I.can under- ,
f 5 stand that situation. .I.have no probl'em as far as rebuttal .,.,, t .. s :- . . .
~
[ -
.of' Engineering.'s decision.
The only' problem I had with.it , E .. . . . f don't feel tliat the t 7 was 'the fact that I. know what I saw. 8 justification was just. I don't feel that the proper i C-f ~ J i q[. 9 evaluation was done.. Now,.this is on my own mind, so I' told
- I
.. 10 my supervisor when h'e, came up and started telling me the r .
i t .
,T, .g 3 same story which was more or less the same story which he [
l'2 ~had'given as farTaN.this is off our back; he asked me .p' 13 if I had a problem with it. "No, I don't really have a , i, 14 probiem with it as.far.as documentation-wise, but, yes, in 15 my own mind, I still have a problem with it." That after-i s-f ., 16 noen I was transferred to. Unit Two., ,
; i 'R.
, JOmiSON: Was this an in-process inspection? !
17 I 3.- No, sir. It was supposed to have been
', l 18 They had no OC with them at the time. !
19 an in-process.
, [ \
' 20 MR. JOm15.ON: you thought was--
~. We thought he was watching it.
21 MR. JOm1 SON: And he thought yotl were watching it. 22 Okay. But it wasn't an in-process inspection. Would yoi 23 know what the final outcome of that particular conduit floor 24 O penetration is,to date? . i
- 25 .
. .. ,o s
. . l .' . . : ,.
.~.
. .. ~. .
. . . .,,e....
... .2. .
8- . . ...; y.sma., ms-~~~.ee- '- ~~- -. - 4 , . .
(
.}. .
I ICTi a 200T, INC. PROCEDURE ~ . EFFECTIVE CFSES NtFSER REVISION CATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 CI-CPM 6.12 3 6/8/83 1 of 5 TITLE: ! ORIGIMTOR: # # PENETRATION SEALS - . AREA RELEASE REY!EWD BY: .a M-47 ccu*t Y _ APPROVED BY bM CCMSial;cT!CH PROJECT 7%MAGER [~7-1 g o.1 , TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 REFERENCES
3.0
$PROCEDURE .
?
4.0 RELEASE FOR HIGH DENSITY SEALS
.b
1.0 REFERENCES
1.1 11JSI Contract CP-0707
- 1. 2 Roon Schedule for Penetration Seals or Room Turnover Schedule 1.3 Itest Renoval Notice Procedure CP-CPM 6.10.
2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE ! This procedure establishes the methods and controls for notift_. cation to the various jobsite orga.71zations for release of rooms and/or areas for penetration sealing. 2.2 SCOPE This procedure shall apply to the notification of the scheduled . date for installation of penetration seals on a room by room basis in accordance with Reference 1.2 and release of the roots and/or area for the penetration seal contractor to perform actual saaling activities in accordance with Reference 1.1.
/
G
~~=.~.'.--.- . x : .- . . . . . .
i- .' -
MCCEDURE_ EFFECTIVE BR0 lim & ROOT, INC, .v au , ; nE'/ISIC3 OATE PAGE CP5ES I .I i M B 35-1195 CI-CPM 6.12 3 5/8/83 2 of 5 2.3 RESPONSIBILITY The Area Managment Group is responsible for scheduling and notification of release of roccis and/or areas to the Procurwent Managment Group. The Penetration Sesi Contractor is respnsible for actual seeling of the penetrations in accordanca with Acf arence 1.1. The Production Control Group is res;rnsible for the statusing of com-plated penetraticn seals. The Procurenent .Mai:sgeeent Group is responsible for the coordination and overall managecent and/or ad:ninistration of the penetration seal contractor. , 2.4 DEFINITIONS 2.4.1 Area Manaqueent Group The organization which schedules, releases rooms and/or areas for penetration seal work. 2.4.2 Penetration Seal Contractor The organization which performs the actual installation of penetration seals in accordance with Reference 1.1. , 2.4.3 Production Control' Group The organization which statuses the completion of penetration seal work. 2.4.4 Procurement Managenent Group The organization which coordinates and performs the overall manage-ment and/or administration of the penetration seal contractor. 3.0 PROCEI)URE - 3.1 The Area Management Group shall notify the appropriate Engineering and craft personnel two (2) weeks prior to the scheduled date for penetration seal work within rooms and/or; areas. Copies of the approved contractor's field survey drawings shall be forwarded to the craf t and the discipline engineers.
. a m2 m l
8 t #
l . .
' PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BR060t & ROOT. INC. MMBER REVISION' DATE PAGE CPSES JOB 35-1195 CI-CPM 6.12 3 6/8/83 3 of 5 3.2 Each discipline surserintendent shall perform all outstanding work within the roos.s i.nd/or areas for penetrations requiring seals.
Each discipitne superintendent (Piping. Electrical. Instrumentation. N111wtght) shall determine that all penetrating items are installed , in accordance with approved design documents and/or design changes. 3.3 Each discipline Engineer shall determine that the design for pene-trating items is complete, and notify the Aras Managment Group of any incomplete designs that could affect the penetration sealing work. 3.4 The Area Managment Group coordinates work for resolution of any , unsatisfactory items and requests final QC inspection (excluding electrical) prior to sealing. 3.5 The Area Management Group shall identify areas ready for penetration seals to the Procurment Management Group.
$ 3.6 The Procurement Management Group shall direct the penetration seal q contractor to proceed with actual seal installation in accordance u with Reference 1.1.
O 3.7 Removal of penetration seals which contain safety-related penetrating t embers shall be documented in accordance with CPM 6.10. . al of penetration seals which contain only nonsafety-related trating mes6ers shall be documented in accordance with CPM 6.10 l the following exceptions: the initiator shall tdentify on the IRN and in the log that - m the subject removal is non-Q in nature;
- 2. the QC signature block shall be "M/A'ed" by the initiator and no QC involvement is required;
, 3. the IRN coordinator shall forward the original IRN to the , Permanent Plant Records Vault instead of to QC.
l E In either case, a copy of the IRN shall be forwarded to Area Managment for contractor. notification. 3.8 The seals may be removed by the craft if the entire seal is required - to be r eoved.. If only a partial removal is necessary. Bisco shall
- be contacted to.make the partial removal. '
~
4.0 REl.tASE FOR HIGH DENSITY SEALS l 4.1 The release of penetrations which recieve high density seals shall be as described above. Additionally, the Release for Penetration
=
Sealing (Attachment 1) form shall be completed prior to the place-menttof the. seals.
- g. .
w
< ~ ~ . .i
<. ~<.
., , .s- ,
l i j i i I i JOB 35-1195 CONANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Construction Procedure DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE MM5ER 1 Notice applicable to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195- CI-CPM 6.12 Rev. 3 . This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure. Change the procedure as follows: Please replace the following with the attached: - page 3 of 5. I I Reviewed by: Z--/YO 1/f _ /N5Y Z-/YW l Cr4(inator DaG~ Brown & Rdot Wality Assurance Date Approved by:
. / - zlu6br/
749rWGC0%ality A(surarle / Dam . 1 ' 17 1 02M8/84 Construction Project ManagerZ~214 Date f Effective Date . - s.-- m
., b- - ,
.=,
- s .
l
.P!tocEtal DRCTWE 1 i
BROWN 1 ROOT IK. ;4MBER AEVI$10M' ~DATE PAGE I
, 4 .
C?$ES I l JOB 35-1195 ci-CPM 6.12 3 06/08/s3 3 of 5 3.2 Each discipline esperintendent shall perform all outstanding work within the rooms and/or areas for penetrations requiring seals. Each discipline superintendent (Piping Electrical, Isetrueestaties, M111 wright) shall determine that all penetrating itene are installed in accordance with approved design documents and/or design changes. 3.3 Each discipline Enginee* eball determine that the design for pene. . treting itene is complete, and notify the Aree Management Croup of ' any incomplete designs that could affect the penetration sealing work. > i 3.4 The Arne Management Group coordinates work for resolution of any unsatisfactory items and requeste final QC inspecties (eaciuding electrical) prior to esaling.
- 3.5 h ' Area Meaegement Group shall identify areas ready for penetration seals to the Procurement Management Croup.
3.6 The Procurement Management Group shall direct the penetration seal contractor to proceed with actual seal testallation la accordance with Reference 1.1. 3.7 Removal of penetration seale shall be documented on sa IRE in secordance with CyM 6.10 in y case of removel. Removal of penetratica seals which contain only sensafety-related penetrattag members need not be documented in accordense with CPN 6.10 with the following onceptiones l ~ l 1. the taitiator shall identify on the IAN and in the log that the subject renoval ta ace-q is esturog i
- 2. the QC signature block s'ea11 be "u/A ee
- by the initiator and 8 no QC involveneet is required:
- 3. the IRN coordinator shall formrd the original IRN to the -
4 Permaaest Flaat Bacorde Vault imetoed of to QC. j Im either case, s copy of the IBM shall be forwarded to Ares Management for contractor actificettoa. l 3.8 m seals any be removed by the craf t if the entire seal is required ' to be removed. If caly a partial removal la necessary, 31eco shall be contacted to make the partial removal. 4.0 REf. EASE FOR EIGE IMINSITY SEALg
- 4.1 The release of penetrations which recieve high density seals shall i
be se described above. Additionally, the Release for Penetration Sealing (Attachment 1) form shall he completed prior to the place-esat of the seals. ' CI-CPM 6.12 Rev 3 DCN #1' --- - - 02/28/84 sheet 2 of 2 w
, .;t . . . .. . , . . ' .
- 1. ; . '
a /4 v.' a w - eh s.W ** . * '
. PROCEDURE EFFECT!YE !
BR0let & ROOT, INC. NWSOL REV!sI001 DATE. PAGE ! i CPSES j i i JOB 35-1195 C1-CPM 6.12 3 6/8/83 4 of 5 ! l i The form shall be initiated by PNG and submitted to Area Manage. ment for routing to the organizations responsible for signing the form. After completion of the form. Area Management shall return the completed form to PMG who mAy then authorize the sealing of the penetration. j . I i 1 [ l I l
.s r
I
.. ~ . . . . . . , .. -
M .. l s * . ,
. 4 .. ...,..4 . . + , ,,. : ,,
' '[j PROCEDURE ETTECTIVE 3c.g i M T. INC. M.M ER REYISION 04,TE PAGE
! CPSES JOB 35-1196 CI-CFH 6.12 3 5 of 5 6/8/83 ATTACittENT 1 IELEASE PER h!GN 00511T PDET144T!0s Stats .
nees its./ Area 813'CDDrowingme.(s) i PunetretienMe.(s) The renetratten(s) teenttf ted ebeve have Leen e,4!wated and ere released for seeltag. (Any escastions should be Itstes her Penetretten an. fn space provfdad.) Stgnature ! Date Escoettens } 80schaattel Instneering I I flectrical Engineering *
.l
!setreertation Engineering i
seneral noenenical superinteident 1 1 Genere1 CfviI Seperfetendent
'lI '
L _1 tinctrical Sumertatendet l *
! I Instmsmestatten Sneerfstensent I l 8 m m t Amet Q4 (Autt) To be *eleased in accardance with CP-04P.12.1 itECD 44 (non A M ) !
t Temi Q4 Electrical
- l ftlEED 44 Instruentatten .
t' i l After styetere, roote to the nest discipline. Upon completion of thte releese, fomerd to the Wesent Menegament groep.
,, . 1 .
l
..' . .s .
D PRODUCTION biSC PROCEDURE COVER S H E I ~.' FOR INFOR_MATION Om 238-3 Procedure No. Dated Revision No. SP 107 June 2, 1982 -2= COMANCHE PEAK TITLE: REPAIR AND REWONK OF BISCO SILICONE BASE-PENETRATICN SEALS
SUBJECT:
REPAIRING OR REWORKING OF BISCO PENETRATION SEALS
.v.ADE FROM SILICONE BASE MATERIALS SCOPE OF CURRENT REVISION:
REVISED SECTION 4.1 AND ADJUSTED SUBSEQUEhT NUMBERING i This document contains information proprietary to Brand Industrial Services, Inc., ' and shall be surrendered upon request from Brand Industrial Sarvices, Inc. The contents are not to be used for other than the expressed purpose for which looned without written permission of Brand Industrio! Services, Inc. BISCO APPROVAL SIGNATURES Original Issue, Rev.I Rev. 2 Rev. 3 Rev. 4 Rev. 5 Rev. 6 Author h
- 0. C. Approval . BG w -
por vc W - l
.Page I of 4-l . ,
- .l . - -
i $4 , t es.7n p 6 s v.e k L g. w 4 +t
s
, U blSCO -
c .3. 0 0 0 C T 1 0 N PROCEDURE
) FOR INF0lOfAT10N O.S'LY TITLE: REPAIR AND RENORK OF BISCO SILICONE BASE SP- 107 PENETRATION SEALS -
i 1.0 PURPOSE - To define the methods applicable to repair or rework penetration seals made from silicone base materials. 2.0 , SCOPE To establish a standard method for the repair or rework of a BISCO penetration seal, so that the resultant penetration seal will meet all applicable requirements. 3.0 RESPONSIBII.ITY - 3.1 The BISCO Project Manager shall be responsible for identi-fring and scheduling the work. - 3.2 The BISCO designated technician (s) shall be responsible for the formulation and installation of silicone materials, 3.3 The BISCO Quality Control Dopartment is responsible for the various inspections of the work in accordance with applicable Quality Control procedures. 3.3.1 Quality Control shall verify and control the documentation of the repair or rework of pene-tration seals.
~
Date s/2/s2 Rev. 2 page_2 of 4
- - s 3 -
, - -..,y
O bisco PRODUCTION PROCEDURE 3 Ol . FOR INFOR\lAT10N ONLY l l TITLE: REPAIR AND REWORK OF BISCO SILICONE S P - 107 BASE PENETRATION SEALS 4.0 REMOVAL OF SILICONE FOAM MATERIALS 4.1 Any voids shall be repaired by filling with the same silicone materials as initially filled in the penetration. Cured silicone shall be removed to a depth t'ayond the void 2" and the repair material shall be installed. 4.2 Removal of areas to be repaired shall be effected by hand, wherever.possible.
- 4.3 Extensive areas of silicone seal removal can be accom- .
.v :
p11shed by conson cutting or scraping instruments, razor T knives, saws, etc. 4.4 wher's electrical cables are present, blunt nonconductive tools shall be used,and care shall be taken not to damage
~ -
existing cables. 4.5 Where possible, power to penetrating cables should be de-energized during the removal of material. 5.0 SURFACE PREPARATION . 5.1 Where the exposed surface has been contaminated by a foreign material, such as dirt, dust, grease, cable pulling compounds, water, etc., all such contaminated surfaces
~
shall be removed to expose a fresh surface for bondi,ng. 5.2 Where the silicone material has been removed for clearance to add a new pipe, conduit, cable, etc., the added item shall be installed by others. 5.3 The silicone material should not support the weight of the new penetrating item unless otherwise specified. Date 6/2/s2 Rev. 2 Page 3 of 4 a . ,
/ e s ,
s _
.g
.aa r9
- ...,- m m,
.=. . v ., . . ,
.,g Pw ".
. -- - w P .2. 0 C E D U R E
- r %./ I U.i
]'
FC3 Lv93MATIO.N 0.p' TITLE: '
. 2? AIR .M.T REl(ORK OF BISCO SILICONE BASE SP- lay
- 22. NET.UTICN SEALS
- 6.0 INST.2 '
- 1.T : -
6.1 The sealant materials to reseal shall be as initially specified. 6.2 Resealant materials shall be installed in accordance with ~ applicable ' standard installation. procedures. .
~
6.3 Documentation typical of a new seal shall be kept on each penetration seal repaired or raworked.
- 7.0 ADDITION OF MATERIALS TO EXISTING SEALS
)
7.1 The BISCO Project Manager or designate shall inspect the. areas to'be additionally sealed for foreign material, etc.; ,
. so that the proper sequence of activities can be schet.uled 7.2 The total seal or ,necessary portion thereof shall be scaled using BISCO standard installation procedures as 1 directed by the BISCO Project Manager.
7.3 Documentation typical of a new sesi shall be kept on the additional area. t 3.0 CLEAN.UP , r 8.1 All excess and scrap material shall be renoved and properly stored. relocated or disposed of. END OF TEXT l 4 i
,Do t e 6/2/62 Ret 2 pag,3 gg 4 O e
- l. ;
. _ . . . r. ~
- y * *
, . , , n..
.'u
.. . .4 . . .
j., ., , ,a ' \
. ~.-,~.--r- .~<w~<+-~~~-m-~~tl"""~~~"'"'""'"""""*
= ,
,Fdo x %M F0lA-85-59 l- . .. . m r. - t do . Q E- b5 h \
4 . s . l Ar s:z : . Catecery: Electrical and Instrume tation 5 Elegtrical !
- ic
- :-fe-tance Report (NCR) Activities \ i
. A1:e:a:*e9 Nu-der: AQE-1. AQE-2, AQE-3, AQE-4, , AQE-25', AQE-33, l . AQE-M,305-35J AQE-37, AQE-38, AQE-40, AQE-41, AQE-42, AQE-45, AQE-47, l J<E-45, AE-24, and parts of AE-22, AE-27, AQE-12, AQE-36 and AE-50. t Chara:teri:ation: It is alleged that the validity of the generation and j disp:sition of electrical nonconformance reports (NCRs) was suspect. ' IsusentofSafety$1onificance: The ir*olied safety significance of % ?,Q ~7 i nast allegations is that the quality of the electrical installation
.z:i.: te indeterminate. 74%
These allegations pertain to various concerns involving the f4CR program, !' anc it:1ude: t !
- Prevalent " usa-as-is" dispositions of NCRs (AQE-33, AQE-47, i i ', fE-34,(_ QE-35) A parts of AE-27 and AQE-36).
i , l I *fne traceability of "Q" items (non-Q fuse blocks were installed ! i where Q blocks were required) (AQE-35); i I i i The TRT interviewed a TUEC electrical engineer and a lead quality engi- , neer (QE) abou+ * "use-as-is" itsposition of electrical NCRs (AQE-33,
)QE-47, AQE-341_ADE-35)nd parts of AE-27, acd AQE-36). The TRT deter.
- mined that for an NCR'to receive a "use-as-is" disposition, an independent
- verification inspection by an electrien1 engineer had to be made for each i
~
reported item of nonconformance. Based on that inspection, and on an evaluation with regard to procedures, specifications, drawings (including ; I applicable codes and standards), and other rela'ted documentation, a 1 l "use-as-is" disposition could be applied. Final approval of such a . l disposition required two QE signatures. The TRT also reviewed the 75 i i NCRs to determine if there were any with the disposition "use-as-is" with , j the explanation "not addressed in ES-100," as alleged. The TUEC engineer l
- also indicated that should an NCR be received with this type of disposi-tion, it would be " kicked back" and would require more justification, ggg !
p The TRT determined that if the nonconformance indeed was not addressed in { ES-100, then a document, such as a procedure er other specificatio ;, 1 that did address this nonconformance item would be required to be refer-enced in the NCR. Of the 75 NCRs examined, tre TRT could identify no i - use-as-is"
" dispositions which deviated from a:plicable design re:; ire-
- eents, e>
- ept for those identified in Electri:a1 and Instrur.entat'en i Category 1, " Electrical Cable Terminations," and Electrical and Instru- !
mentation Category 2 " Electrical Cable Tray and Conduit Installation," l regarding NCRs identifying bent terminal lugs in motor control centers ty a:n d ) J l; :
.6
' ~
1._. t/ $ o /bf l D C.ovi (part of ACE-36), and reporting two loose conduit elbow fittings (part of 5 AE-27),respectively. These TRT findings were discussed with the allegers, ene of whom disagreed with the TRT findings as related to g g.7 AQE-34 and?AQE-35)and provided additional infcrmation. The TRT is currently evaluating this new information and will report its findings in 76\ a supple ant to this SSER. , The TRT interviewed QC and purchasing personnel and an electrical general foreman for construction, and reviewed pertinent documentation to deternine the adequacy of traceability of safety related (noted as "Q") items [(AQE-35). The TRT determined that procedures and controls, if , % Q '[
/propeny w .-]d, were adequate to ensure the traceability of "Q" items UN and that they would preclude the possibility of substituting "non-Q" for "Q" ite s. The TRT reviewed a large number of installation docu ents and fou-d all the required traceability documentation.
Conclusions and Staff Positions: Based on the reviews of the pertinent docut.entation, examinatten of NCRs and the information obtained from the interviewsh the TRT concludes that adequate procedures, controls, and process checks exist for the generation and disposition of reported items a f aoncerformance a. related to the concerns raised by the above ' al l e ga tic *,s . The TRT &*s: con:1udes that of the allegations identified at L.-e o; tset of this se:: ten, only a few spe*cific instances were found which raised qusstions concerning the adequacy of safety-related items. These are discussed above and are discussed further in other sections of the report. y%Q7 The results of this avaivation will be further assessed as'part of the overall programmatic review of all NCRs addressed under QA/QC Category 5 ]Q "Nonconformance Reports," and under QA/QC Category 6 "QC Inspection." j Therefore, the f.nal acce;tability of this evaluation will ha predicated on the satisfactory result of the overall programatic review on these subjects. Any adjust-e s to these conclusiens will te re;c-ted S a s.:.;.l e a to this SIE".. .e results e' the TRi restei, cf r.as it.for.a-tion con:erning allegatics.s ACE-34/A0E-357and AQE-37 will also be reported in a supplacent te this S$ER. - FiEPGLiEk.itE T)otuw\EtJT5 !. 1, id C R d o, E t%- 02,'6 %B$ R. d, to 'lC-
- 2. ud hj o , E B3- ot'S $ 2 a/f.t/63 ,'b .da A 4:u
/es .
- 1. %Len .. hw Oe.\- si \%d fy ce df-- Sol AM ked .
}v<vn
A t- 4 J - a o a
$ q
~
.s - t/ sa /d
- kas-K (ud, ald )
dev m ee.E c.o s s e >a r s : 4 - A b e -e y' 0 5 mv A ai -SoE
- A A L, w o u yd nV"-*g WKs 9 w~
wicbtebcAi.m@~M % W %(,~r**Rt?A ,
, em.64 t
y m m mts,. .% u ces mA
- a *We"CL 4., 4 o 7.t i i ! L v . ha i0 i n ,' % * * \u,%.[u h ' <. 5LIn en emb l % dbw as . 5 3 i si hak u W,-L ~ + % q w%
-cL ~d t. n V A 4Lo-w.b e
Au .bk 4 a MrmM.tkd ~ Au 3 em-sit,
-(c.unA) i (nm - %. n -
. N Q N. A
- p< n a.Lav.snb
- u.sg oC , usos- duvy emA. =
, er h m4 L n A=sa % M b 6.] ccMM s.-
- 4 %C JeD<). , hg L %
A w(med-c~0 cadd ks n w.w & na m s s& L. .,,& . I 4~se wf%cJ 4 o ( i w) e.o $ g a 6 s % % >\ i A. ' wA 4 Ym4 l
- w. n ,bwAo wM4 .
2.C\~-ab.L.J.(a') / GON. g w Q% % ' 1 . . - - . .
-- - d -
sj s o /s .' i h o G - 15 can r,$o b } l \ wr,n o p:,wocu.vedumcd ' cc,d cT ay G?S6 h ) n Q.vSd .% ks \vipc o.w b \963 nm
% v vw
-Q.ns.
4o v bg h.A.g0<.s cw S % vn wtc y'Lsn N usv4 iw s LJ.A., w %- q.m 4. L c9 L - eif ac -o L.dhiaa c 1 a u.e H- d
- ce c c era m o owb -iR vd b. R o a.a.v o.% ft 6 bjm o %.4 .-e i .d
( nb hv k r o. wv- l.a no' %Es s-oti4 Mca. aw E E E BO O t\ E 74 04. hd-yb Cu.s.4. s aw . f u. u_
- h. Q (_Q ) h a - a. oc c. m]
4 C. P 1. - E E P R.c - o 9 w< qwnas : , b'v. k sked.h.cD ( w m = P \9b3) y4 W c. i t e, -N nm q vrw o m.u 4,. i is M & - Acw L U ( w G % 4vu A.d w o l 3, E.E-ih$ - 04 6 D '7d C 4 Swh E ~ - B A - o +s 1 - 7404- )
- hs k iaa toA e ww- \ca ,
- 7 u C.R
' s Stn G b(I E cda % 2.% 2.6 '445M,W at -0 i
. ve m A l usa.s &vfw4mc.4 W&, t 4. !
casr 4 MQ o7 -% w a . L. A . - oh M ! Q m ts yi 1 X>wv.4., ta.w.d.t/ veWsik A wo. 'Rt74dr.p s4.L; -
$L s,cJw h.- wCa.k we.k(.c %'ly.r&dl u.u r 4, wc.L A,g4 myky ;cis ; q.4Rd
. _ u . _ _.__.. _ .__ . . _ . - . _ _ . , . _ . - _ . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ , . _ _ - - . _ , _
E * --4 4 _n -- m ,1,-e-g , #
.x-r/uhr QE - 3'I w J.u[
w ab.w' c.R \is o%< .' 3 .7 2. a . . -{
?) c. A- 17,setB . h7 4c 4--u p 6s9.u.b4 l
~% %g u. \ w, :-
~
nm
- 6a \
bbd.i s v. . G. 4 a'n&Get 3av bh vq e.P- u P- zo 4 xa.P- EE- b L r i i O -kw.bdb4,',hcb. hk s .(e 4 i 5' Ascu 4 b,+ d +
%, %qA 6T.
u> e y n , ;.< w ., O MY \/ ( G.
~
Tavr-u Ac , v i y f a
%)f l .ev w m d h -
R b T4A !~ T)av,;.. e.ac p 5<.a, kwm m ct 1.c4.a LL6L n i a C
- , w LJ qwo 4 h 'w hu, w k-A. w %ise u.w d @
ut e ' a4 v- c.Pc.k$ o - 44 o') t , e4, m'+vc.hu.w sww cyc[w/ whU a vu.shiaci s &wW g r< I (mle in. 'd p r m A. p b-v%ic w&M L
\d37s '"."C'^^,ht *1
~
_me,arwey w~aa ho m
@e.!~"
- ,' o , u nc b s- k n w yce.tJ<.c0 . , ca k .
\J m im ~ ~ , 4c,
% od~6ivi ica smocb c chirn hk }'
l t pa %s n 4\am %qs m n.- u k . n n d..wa m-0 n_7 M o. s hwx 4 Geedum
>/ u/or q,--
a L e d d a,aan>%
%>k.
.w +
a avas %.wk m
%s . yd b. ,.o:,
a .Avh
% qc m A .% %. ne v 6 m 4 T' aC6 m Twa wa An % sL,c&AckA s,ck
& ~~
^c5 k,L&w00 man %g .g mc2 % a a % w
.eec ad -
Oh k g c.hrA. n n b 0 7 1\
}s WI% ;GD % uu bvmina mm &si h6 x W ,bs te u-hw wA o u At %
ee-cvm s.\ 9eL I on 6
'6 . 4 . . % }ae.6.n m o i G \
Gmssa :'
. .J..,%N
.n b O o.s n u% %, vw t 641w . t t . EY.A A CA vt b Aa&.4 c.sn n e--V
,2, m3mnt,/
e.cxs't0.0 wuE \ vs' ca.t 8 & . Le.f kg %.. ;hj-Wq u %s &gd
^ ~
kyme eft- oib r- , m a n u. % <. M w e d i ewJ ok - % . h y0.4c v.ghawn kp o 2.t ) vnin dm p.c d q m agwd, d 91 - ET er4CI- to wo' M v'i o.hk dhmhD cvs tac _ I d 6 6- olz.1ct4 T os %<. as h ',' i l l l
& l t **'
e
/ t /S: S-T TR T _.
. .. . . -3 > - .
- _, c. m . 9...-. -
ob k J. ~-N -r -i N .M 'd.qi wn - s ) .:.v h --cr-a N (t.
., c d-v' S tA r< N% . ~. . ,. \ D.-C-t ,w.r.% ~-uu, N u v, c.A (; 'E:. - N, . '% L. , ' . n . . y
.I
&j ~
n . A6L L e a .
* -: - . ' , ;. .. - /.
. .N:.c,, S C t.
fYt h be., .i. h. ' t ikN\ e-4 o n L. & t W. c .5 dk5 m c ~ e t. o. , w L L#, ,g
% m c ,.emce 4. v o mtuk 6 ta obw o . h en a b s p (
x C-t t OM*5 \ - t':.Q i17.N.M-)
- dtytA.,
/
...e3 1
9 4 e 5 9 -
.s .e TEX 55 UTILITIES CCMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION NONCONFO;iMANCE REFORT (NCR) !
~
;INI:cN3 Co J,
*E23-023 2th i SqE I aF 3 LNi? l STRUCTURE, SYSTEM ITEM /CCVPCNENT TAG LOCATION OR ELEVATICN RiR NO I i1 M (o 5 % Lis ha.lONUUSERkl~ %E 830 A)/A w o & w n ei
' NONCCNFORMING CONDITION p,, , ,, a te n.su w y e
E ecdhdu C - l'//f5 ' 8: QA RECO.7D I i 5 Nr 4. - R a,.. lz f5E F f WRck tY1 TNT ~ ruL hmw.m so. i g : ARinS /s ,r . 2 INDEXED R,""X' ' a ydd Tagg MP l!@
^~
f . i i mere *ENCE DOCUMENT- ff Eb ME8 REV PARA l REPORTED BY: % DATE: i l
'* 2 _- W/ h'!:'/ff $ AIY$ $
l OE REVIEWiAPPROVAC DATE: I
/> > 2 g6 / a1 Ti & h O
ACT:CN AOCRESSEE V D ENT DISPCSITION: REWORM REPAIR III ( ) uSE AS 13 SCRAP I Items purchased under req. #R17473 were installed under operational travelers .
! EE-83-0215-7404 and EE-83-0214-7404. They were removed and returned to non-1E i
$ , storage (step 3 & 5 of travelers EE-83-0451-7404 and EE-83-0450-7404) these same y , travelers insta11rit material purchased under reo #R17486. Use as is.
8 Installed fuses are verified via CP-SAP-20 and XCP-EE 8.< hags.
$ required is through the Start-up program overview. (l ee,
~
invoivenent I COPY gu 3D ENG. REVIEW / APPROVAL MU M, ,, Y I i n ,DATE.r, n N _n ! Y OE REVIEW APPROVAL: DATE. w c r vtRiriCATiON a C;.cSu
~ ' ~
/? ) -
1 0 1 4 4 1 l; o j j iy 3 - - r /
$l fff $ NNY e I i 1
L
J INI0luWll0N .
^
Q MF 782-otne's, )h't w 8 31 rifO 1051S 8201/1/90 VUG dU3S3Hlfd /VSlE771G /H n?-1'????- 04 VNG g/-3/dyS/-/0 RNGSU WU M#/N' VUS 03
' 59WE ldd3/S1/79 VS von-Sr391J 85771301723S WJ'%M0 AH/PH 0201110 7M03183# V9- 8/letE' !ldP3SJNl. Lf.ryS iSUG 1+;911Q /gn2//J V SydslA y]7rlid dY3M y #oN-SV/71A 807y120
- 30SJ' d'r:'2. VY.S/ H//37 dd/r M ,,Sdf?tf' 911/41/9# SH/71 929NB
- 1
;12 dUM/d/vo V01Mrif INSW3uwS 291 WfXU/'hd PUG f9857lU$201
)wme'sawe9 we sisyw. os iires Uwem Sxor sr
!ygztasis a iecaM' yrielre' go dr3sses cs s/sdyn2
/wznem sotsraw od asdriS/rps 01ssroer yrtoyoksU/s a
?91 M N230 3015dlOF7 99N1297'
- dlP 74#JJ/SVa!M MIJH SLWJ0d 3VSH1//#91-54112 827rllG (
zv.ir rr3 wSe77se e sedrtx yrreize spotswz.. mw.H
)1353/ynM/aslorWsPJars3Sitsrz122s/prtluJ9 pod
[2370 51pyrff GN7J /SS/rJS NOH-Sfffid 'b37!l?0 /723's
;l;yS WS1/n2110 gh S1911 nd 2M/#93/S ld/S 5/1091/JN73142
~i 007191/J9771051S /451/173G /N SFd711937f1JG 3/?itut7u.
NNdlQJ 1 R3 S/13E952fllG' NU L#.?-dU-T ~147 54d1lA 57/SSIH2wM edy droJ /S 03lI/2/U10 81/tS VM> WMuor od iLH.J 3fO//W9fA L#.3/MJ 50d/9915' ld1/2 G/J vrWf01SS SfdllA-357/!f.O 37MDd/N 01 ak3 38///dfrJ/U1@?# /J /G '
/MSl'/77JQ' 99 /d d//77(XS 011M.uyJ fH070 0191V02 M S6/2/A-
/37/19017112aoH ed 63 390/JWJN$ d/J621/S 5fJS11-9971150',,
)?thS3$7/1Hl'?d L/7009H 199 W59/7/lA 09 MF-T/131A/11lliG i
3791S /WS1/773G /U 5r/2ld U31F130 3$/lduJU/!WG /MGf'M WSlf773G 009-S/121/ 831kj/G W.JS '83/#9 /US.lF772d /N SffilA 837/130 ' 1
A/Cf EB3-02328$ pnge aors ESt.iPrzn7 DUR/HG RuC776HM 7Z-57/AC, LE2'5 255!)lT3 CF 27012 7757 /f'ffGEMED /fDs-idP/W7E. #C DfcuMfkTmd E7/ST
<.u-76 6/uOW 7B CCHOma ATE EEE 323-/??V PJff y 4W hh CU.40FK/7d/ o m MEXiUDs' m .s w n 2:rwszTff EAD EESuliMOS7 BE T/E kr Tdf7 /%57LE1';3,2*T 7p? Edu/7Ef9'B ADEfaWY 79 fffRDI /7.>
'240/ FED 24t77/s: PE LYCuME/7/7/M RaST BE // A FM// 7MTf.04s
. VER!fE/77MBf G/MZEYTPf&n4FL fBER TJM 7)FQUBIF/EP3iBC
.SMl'lD M# THE MEREMa#CEP/A!/REMEWS fg5 Gyg'/Rg7on A-71GL} RE5DATS, MD Thr alis77FKW7? sos.
d
.i _ SEE Sm9CbmENTg .I AAfD,2 Y ATTAchmenr t R-t 748(o
. ATTACH n1EMT D R-!T4 73
.i ~ ~
{ N
.1
.i .
INFORMATION COPY
- l PPRV 6 e
(
o ., . . .. .. .u , . THX AS UTil,lTIES GENisitATING COMl'ANY "* 1 '" - '- ci'scs rici.n str.QUISITION - CONSTIT HTION ENYkNMIb ' inis n no e a *uncnnt. purini
]
'tr S- - _ _ _ .
f
"^"'"'"'
. . . Lit. . t-Ki R tG t_lblG114EERiti h nratnsasum tno C?-Gl.C. S 5.7/'h_
skeg_y..._ t.lI V sf Air.lia INTLNDED USf a Ilg_ AN Al.y_7 tUL._ANDJotti; n a t r ._ __.- kk-_..mM
.. . _ _ _ . _ _e.m r._fr unstmac.c.u.ci.E _nni.Ks nAir neouinio 8
2 7.5 / 6 3 . ._. - . senP vi A ._ . _ . . . . . _ __c..e_L- . it r e n ci . dJ, c t's - M.Efic L-E' s r.simmto cos r .. s
.nirriuc uAle: _ _ _ . _ _ . . . . . _ _ _.__ _ .
F 0 0. TrRMS? OtiVE R a_. m._.___ . _ _ . m.r-v a , = , = -,= = . . n-a ,,rasuyMeg i *",'"^'""'""^'u/4 'N MN
-v/M d - ~ '
ovEo E~vIoE^M//l/w' arraovio - w , .- - - w , l . 3
TEXAS UTILITIES SERVICES INC. TSG-2996 OFFICE MEMOR ANDUM To tva- vrg=' =, g (cPP'-M ae l GI a bee, Temas S e e r =-b a r 22 1983 Subnet PfvANewr Prir smM n TcTRIC STATION Purchasing and Installation Requirements for Fuses REF: 1) CPP-13.537
- 2) CP-SAP-20
- 3) ICP-EE-8
- 4) TNE-PR-3 The purpose of this meno is to establish an engineering position re:'--d'a* eha purchasing and installation of fuses in safety related circuits as req in s Reference 1. hhh
, Baektround Fuses have the following attributes: A fuse failure can degrade the function of equipment in which it is installed. Fuses are installed in both safety related and non-safety related circuits. Fuses are mass produced, simple in design and not specially sade for the nuclear industry. Fuses are indelibly marked with parsmaters that are related to their safety related function (sup and voltage rating). There are no special storage requirements for fuses. Fuses are inspected by Start-Up after installation per CP-SAP-20 and ICP-EE-8. Analvsis - The current carrying function of a fuse is related to safety when the fuse is used in a safety related circuit. The simplicity of construction, commercially available nature, and unifone quality of the commercial product qualify fuses to be procured as a commercial
, product. (Code C per TNE-FR-3)
The following factors naka receipt inspection unnecessary for fuses: Marking of fuses with parameters related to safety.
- Lack of special storage requirements.
- Inspection of safety related fuses after installation as mandated by CP-SAP-20 and ICP-EE-8.
BRJ *1699
l
..o_ _ _ _ . . . . . --
l i TSG-2996 Page 2 1 Position I Fuses may be procured Code C per TNE-PR-3, with the Start-Up inspection of the fuses per CP-SAP-20 and XCP-EE-8 substituting for receipt inspection requirements. No QA involvment is required other than overview of Start-Up I activities under CP-SAP-20 and XCP-EE-8. TNI-PR-3 vill be revised to reflect this position.
. l T) %
Peter B. Stevens Supervising Engineer
'TUSI Nuclear Engineering PBS:5AH:eq ,
cc: L. M. Popplevell - CPPE Elec. Art London - TUGCO Start-up V. I. Vogelsang - CFPE-Elec. INFORMATION - COPY PPRV F RECEIVED SEP 301983 l 7us: L El.EC, gyg,
.s .* . .
. r - - - - - - - - -
. . e.g j - . . _
. .ew-g. .
c,
-'t
.-lf. .. %.'.*,, i . gi.*#: s s
- . .t.; .c
, .<. . . ..s ag;:ga.*
-~~ *..g s . .
a- i 4 " < w , .. . n.u
..* ~~ _., , 1.
. CONS'"RUC"."1CM CPUET'CM T71 AVE,ZR 15-419 S
@'2%. .. T @ Peaz},,,CF .Mt,lN. rI UNIT NC.
1 g inAvg,y,3.,3c. __ ::ca-0214-7404 Q EcutP%ENT NC.CD1.EI: i OFT-00 1 h % T.T. @ T CP CUSE Bl.0CKS AND FUSES l @ "E N U CI # # D OTE 1 kj
'Ds m nce./ms.tas M. Ms IV ennroni WMMonnu ei ain'.n= f@878N i ma
- "l.I : a.
v . _ __ w .xnc e f e ,) o v , n;g 62 / t d / f 1, ggg'.re orru es..tye oryn p:. f j g . h ll Rtyttw c rr " M * ^^ 3 ATE NM ___ ... Ans ngyngw dM CATt
-_} -";".".I lt in u oc- l
- tMtM., JMP ' e c. i co :ey-. evene en n uum qun..; . .. . . .t I
T. yi - a (1) Reliance Owg. M-99AX403-F : NOTE 1: ?M ; C1C).. ; Modified my DCA 16,094 Rev. 1 & 16,104 'S '
'f Sht. 1 Rev. 4 j'
Sht. 2 Rev. 3 4 . f.Q ,g ' ~d y (ii) Gibbs & Hill Dwg. 2323-El-0136.Rav. 3 : nodi"ted ;p 7.' .<- d q ; by DCA 16,123. ,
, . l ?.: 3 i c.-
- q. 7 1
.- ; y-i' li 1, ~ ELECT Pick u: 12 double-pole fuse blocks GE type 8421-3 and 24 Buss 70 -
fuses type NON 3 purchased against CPFf8960 from NON-Q Rack- 2
@ 4' * ?
; P: ?.
' . ' . . . ,, w.,,
.. - J,, .'.
-A --
in warenouse 'C' . n #- - . .
.y. .;.
. r. ~
$3 hl #
h...- E ?s. T J-El.ECT Instali fuse blocks and fuses '(Obtained from OP f 1) on AC and T l.'i.[ " 4.t OC. fuse par.el on back of rack CPI-EIPRCI-09 tenporarily for test W) ing purpose only.
. e N NM7 / Y'd
.. % h....(
- <pp..e.v.,/,47ei .; . . .>
4..- .
, ' . pcE g. *. .
76.: .
,a ..___ .. . , , 1 . _ _. . m. .,
. .s y. ,w. ..~ , a aa
-.n 4. . be .
. V5 :. ,-
.....l,..,................w.
a, __...,.1
. ........ . _ .. 2.t .
. ~
l_.. .,,t.s.s__
. ~ . __
"- - -.ar O s]. 7g A *,
' p .j %
e.J g,hdn e >, .,wis A4F. ;Y t-
'. ; "" tun _i ,hdp %;a, s..c8 G:'s %x < .
......w
......w..
. . o.. .: g
.a -
g,
.__.- . . . . . . ... ...........o. . -w, . .. ..
y' ) : a.: ' ' #e,. ,c h.:- wiv ade .., , . N. ..
- y. .i.;a m
. , . . . ,s x.,,
.,_ ,,_ _p.
_ ~_ _ _ _ . m . . g. . . . . . p g y . ., .. p> - m, *. kM,
*y t 5, .
- v. o.r.g.de o .' @,. ~ .4 .
..w. :..
- m%.so,W;?" .s
; :. .~
Uporr comoletion of ' wort, return traveler to Electrical Engineer. g . ing Depart:nent. Attention: 1. Ahmad. . *LY /O.-- 9 5
~.
'* i v. .
Upon'ecmpletion of engineering review, forward to 0.E. T.,,;@# 4,..q. .h$.'!,$'[ w
.w a ;
&y. . .;,y gc Elssu-o n Oct eM <im M ls. rwne stos M.s .& .
-l-l Aymecen % reme w-n.oyas 74oy ,, . _y y l
Wg 7he/w 33..Y,D <m.4.. h..
.. . ~..' .
. c f A ""~. 2 o ,
~v :.~T.. ~. . ..
~-'
urs~.r: x; .*.- '4
- f. j3y
- j. .- 4 0
_.--,m, e,-%,r,- - - - - - - _ - , . , , . , . . , ,,,_-,,..y_., _..,.,p_ ,.,,,._,_,,__-.,,,_.m.,_,,,,,,,w,,,.=,.,_,_,,,,,,9,.,. , . , . _ , - , _ _ , . _ _ , ._,wg. 9gy--,_m,,.,9.-9,..9
- - ... -...... ..... - m - - .
- 13. .. T- 3. .=3 . ,s, e.
.g
.7- :. t t 3
.i-.g'
. g'/ ,
l i CON 3"MtJCTICN CP8.".RATICN T"A AVE! ZR 3.s=4 t S". h EbO215-7404 bNENIM b 1 bY -
@@.@.A9E!.MG?E BLOCKS AND FUSES l@ 8EFI*N T'"68E 1.
'j,
- 71.M Ii s t**'.TICN lQto3Y37and l.
!t
;Os SPE" MCC./C64. M5?M. us-605 CONT 40t 200'4 El . 830'0" '
- MEPMEC 5Y NECU M CATE U/U U CEP'".ELEC RICAL ENGINEERING.' ,.
ggyggygg gy /f A TM ATE C NW $ .. Ant ntV1tn NA Cart YT - MA6Tllut . O
!ep =sr. ! ereur.en .
- r. P -
y .a e' I' _ NOTE 1: (1) Reliance Dwg. M-99AX403-F , Modified by DCA 16,094 Rev. 1 & 16,104 + I, [ Sht. 3 Rev. 3 , Sht. 4 Rev. 3. - L ("li) Gibbs & Hill Dwg. 2323 El-0137 Rev. 3 modified by CCA 16,213. '.'.
- i. .
l' . Pick up 12 double-pole fuse blocks GE type 8421-3 and 24 Buss ! .4 7 h*, 1 ELET , fuses type NOM 3 purchased against CPF # 8960 from NON.Q Rack - [Mg3 ,:; . 2 in wareneuse 'C' . p. .,, s
. - (f.
^[I El.ECT Install fuse blocks & fuses (obtained from 09 # 1) on AC & DC 3 .
"[ . I$
'*Y-M fuse panel on the back of rack CP1-EIPRCI-10 temocrarily for.tes - ".
f.1lt .
.Q, f,,
(,i.
..u,..go. ......vg e-e. . ... ., .. . . ;-- .,
e ^: tyr: "?" : ; . . ;' . m . . , v.p. J .. ,r 19i [....a ' n c. i.;; '7C ' , h,;h7/g/
,, m . ,,
; g ;,........
. . . ' '. ? C .- ..I f t :.g3 .* '
j
,c._ . . _ , . , , . . Utte,i .. .. . . .
.._.........,,....................m.
, .; i g . ;,,q 7j:.g
.. .w wm.
. .. .,. ( 5 . .- .r
..s c._ _
. . . .~ - - . .
,.< 1 , ...
m 1
,,.- .~. . . . -
.- :.3 w .r . ,~.
4,y/# MJ '$,s.
.t e ;;.m =: ' ;;;.:i s.gj/v. .
.p. l 1 --
ua . 4 .
'. n9 " **
.e W"~ *"
.c 4 .'.g+ .%. ., n.
.a
[ .. .
,is h ) !
. ;. .9.i- *y?.% ,.r4, S. ~
Upon comoietion of work, retuirt traveler to Electrical Engineer.. nd: .., '. ' ' " -
' yr.a . 2' '
C.)". . . .'T/C ' .) E-
~
ing Department. Attention:. i. . Ahmad. . .
~
Upon completion of engineerinh review, forward to Q.E. ' . ~(',h. .o ;
,,,, $h.
y ,
. . c.
4 ?. M nsm datow wm s, rwwn.-- ev-9-omM- wiu Vk T**'snrPs horW ~
'4 --
l'^
?.3 "9 '
1 M n ,/i<-/e3 6N.: Y 7 -ti"- r .T
'o e-2'1 .. %.
C. .vh ' -- fL l * ..., . . f . .. : ' t m
~
1 -
. ..l-p a, !
i l i e ' d-
- h. ...
^ ~ ~ ~ ~
CO.Ns'"MUC* CN PCMA? cM ?MAVEl t!t 3Sm iS S b "'t233 0 50-7a01 blENCEk9 h"'i WD"' b"D [5 #'Ve WS.'W ., in en enn,< e unn; n 0 *M D CE ** ***** e.. ve-- , a
'Os As./
N enn .;lE ca?,~:CM, oaam_ c1. msn'.n= C*/W 3 Y 3 71. 7I.'.d s iv SNE.P4Cr/ Eh4.1Ms"*M. MS-605 cg 6 ***-da*1 fa-d-==a'-- ~,,. VA HU 4 ##h - CATE d"t*-ff
- M Epaag .3:r 0/#/#4 -
, .WfEWE: 57 * *T U/"O- CAT.E -
i i . cA?t := -- l AM: ervtrw lese-,g.g3 l 2 , j
.. . e* -sP* vearts I MOTE 1: (1) Exo Sensors Orawing mcdified by DCA #
I 17,398 _ 1120003 Sht. 2 of 2 Rev. C (CPF-145:3)
. (ii) Gibbs & Hill Drawing modified by DCA fg . ...
li :,,;i , ** " g, ~ 16,C84 Rev. 2
- t 2323-El-0C80 Sht. 7. Rev.14 * '
2323-El-0080 Sht. 8. Rev.12 2323.El-0136 Rev. 3 %N ' 2323-El-0137 Rev. 3 (iii)Gibbs&HillDrawingmodifiedbyDC3# pp.W 1y 16.132 Rev. 1 j 2323-El-0076-41, Rev. 8 l Pick up 13 double-pole' fuse blocks and 26 fuses procured 2;ur. (1"dt$-e 1 y lact
' under field requisition No. R17486 from QA Rack-2-C in yg Mareeouse "A". l l
.; M l i
Install one: fuse block and two fuses (obtain from Op. No.12 44'#"" jg MS Z. ETect . g ) on DC as. the. wiring fuse per OCA. panel #15.084on Rev.back, 2 and 17,398- of rock CP1-EIPRCI-09 a . ,
.- y i
.._ - y l
. Disconnect:.the wtring- from existing AC aed: 0C fuse panels .7prf {
2 pact ' l gp( and remove fuser and: fuse. blocks: w ).._. :. D - '.- . f 4 Efect Raplace the fuses and fuse bTocks for- AC and DC fuse panels, g - ont.ined f- 0, Ne 1 and. ca iete the . iring. * ' yd . 5 Elect Returve the fuse hiocks and fuses removed wider Op. No. 3 to N g 5c'4N.b c4 warenouse,non-TE. storage. g l _ ! ", upon completion of wort, return traveier to Electrical "
,) w i ;u,, ,
l t Engineering Department, ATTEETION: Ijaz Ahmed. - i ! ! gs s.7. g w oom, A ss.n e.1 usor M : d c <gon. ,s 1 S W n.< m mt & ' " ' I Uoon casoiecion of review, famro to Q.E.*'*.,me . l
.- - ,_ _ . . _ . . _ . - _ . ._ ____ _ . . . . . _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ . . . _ _ . _ . . . _ . ~ _ . - . _ _ _ _
i 1 l i w- ;
~
I c:.ssnuc- c3 :7ea- :N es N 2.swes --
*
- M " ggg3-0151-740N b 1EcSeer t 1n - 1 b ' ' '
l@ " " #* " See Note 1 I
!@#6eiSCTu@f To Core teeline **eniter
~
{@ $ , 3 7 onem. n . o3n. n= - b** Tsna l ,_ {6 N N "
- Ancews
- MS-605 =2 g c. 2c - n gp_,, El ectrics 1 Eaoinee-im _.
p _. m gg Wmi!!<W csn C-! /V.3 1 tA?T __ .. A.1r *tvtrw p .,
!c=nr9: tis. m e, :sy= k opest on NOTE 1: (1) Exo Sensors Drawing modified by DCA 417,398 1120003 Sht. 2 of 2. Rev. C(CPF-14535)
,C8A FORMATl0N (11) Gibbs & Hill Drawing modified by DCA #14 Re. 2 2323-El-0080 Sht. 7. Rev. 14 I
7 l l 2323-El-0080 Sht. 8. Rev. 12 ' 2323-El-0136 Rev. 3 - 2323-El-0137 Rev. 3 (iii) Gibbs & Kill Drawing modified by DCA #1 5.132 ffgy ; Rev. 1 2323-ET-0076-41. Rev. 8 Pick up 13 double-pole fuse biceks and 26 fuses procured gg.1 4s 1 Dect g' under field requisition No. R17486 free QA Rack-2-C in Qp,.3 7 Warehouse "A". n'b Install one fuse block and taso fuses (obtained free Op. No. .p ~ 2- Doct $/r6 g,) 1) are pieta DC tha wiring fusa as per panel ort DCA #16.084.Rev bacE~of rack 2.and 17.398. CPT-EIPRCI-10 '//W . and c j g rniffr E ;Tec- ' ok s'etn, ac and Oc fuse panets 1 l a 7/sc and remove fuses. and, fuse blocks-asd
#, .
- u-
' ant f hTocks for AC and Oc ftsse panels. ;
* ,Teet RehTace be Ikr_ I and campiece the wiring. f 7j g FM 0
,, esf) obtainst from
-p . . . p.
Bect Return .the fase blocks and fusas removed under op. No. 3 to h,,g 86 c9i 4h 0 I 5 suisf, warehouse. non-1E. storage- $ . sp(L .
. > f.
Upovr camotector of work, return traveier to ETectricai Engineertng Deparamurt. ATTENTION: Ijaz Ahmed. f,,,, Q , .. ,ust+ i . I Upon completion of Engineering review, forward to Q.E. I N'Y 4eI=*sf3 on bsoda.s,snorw* p d d.33f Lo**f , wrapes - e.e 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . . . _ - _ _ _ . ,,,._,-, ,,-r,.-,-..,,,._,.,.,_.~.-,,.,_,.,,v.,._.
TEXAS UTtuttES COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION hE'NEGTING c3. NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR)
,o238g g,1 UNIT STRUCTURE / SYSTEM ITEM / COMPONENT TAG /tD NUMBER L T N OR ELEVATION RIR NO
. 1 Ag W w.i Aal M EIARFm as 830 AM NONCONFORMING CONDITION e
i ! 0 j o se Ar"
- INFORMATION COPY I' k PPRV RE*ERENCE DOCUMENT-
- N '
REV I U PARA 2. /
- 9/ M I OE REVIEW / APPROVAL: DATE: '
w O u $ ' f inh] , ACTION AODRESSEE s'/ DEP
- i. --
a r i DISPOSITION: ' REWORM REPAIR USE AS IS W SCRAP y see attachment m QA RECORD 1 l W min. oA naview 8 ne w e e ARMS n a a. 8 c.
@EXEg . .nm
? C- ...
l ( ENG. REVIEW / APPROVAL LvH/ A, v l - to ,DATE: meg is OE REY!EW APPROVAL: DATE-
- u. OnlA UR
= /D!20Y8 \
QWl IO!N?..eFICATIOWN & CL$5:d,, a (!YAmir
- - /oi/xn DATE:
l COMMENTS: / gis a,m e ,d==ra-- ~ ~ ~~~~6 Hoso TAC Sw vFD. (fdf?*- /0 dd ? : i w , l l
U Ti::c:i: - :# >" I ~~ "I S?S R-1 USE A5 :i iv'
- 1. The dis::st 'en of .'iCR E-23-021945 not referring to the Supplement Number and Iter t:u-te r 3:e -Me ^' aft to " draw" the terminal bicek is acceptable and not a concenferring item. Use as is.
- 2. Ncn-0 Suc :.in 0211 Termir.a1 Elecks have not been purchased from Reliance Electric Ccepany. Use as is.
- 3. The'only Ecc ar-sp 0211 Terminal Blocks stored in the Conteni Room are the Reliance Electric Cce:any furnished cnes. The Buchanan 0111 Terminal Blocks are readily identifiable and cannot be confused with a terminal block oy "various Manufacturers, Types, and styles". Use as is.
- 4. The insoection being conducted for NCR E-83-021945 is one of verification.
These can be considered bulk items therefore, specified intended use (i.e. CPI-EIPRCI-10 damaged terminal block replacement) is not required. Use as is. INFORMATION COPY PPRV l l
^
w
l .. .. s./dA aps-e,732e% e i IN hp % 1 1 d)Ai/t ajoshi~g sict E83-0.2l9ss'. det r%s/ ri wsa// ~7daws/ AbeA i o f:lf aeaw ca.was7mmw as cor-Sarisfpx>< io sor.urir r iF 7Exwas/ Adal v.4s eMbeasso aw>rs 6#-405. /?,s' tQ #1/?Fns/. MR 140757 fit i+fs77 sis /s.v MfR 6#-9453.sda 8T/4MO us.s As wiris//xzip1~orsrszea/ , Se Ahoce Eyw, owr >7 .22671o C,-lI-8/. May fuac Anst o>eptas Awr dsce keesssh Fsa CP-4&5 Swer f/- 9463., ,0/stis.ewg Qsss sGs -Q /r/ Mees /
~75rtz s.s so rrs**s W ZkW,en?/sc //~wAt:7' ~jf.ww */
' ~
$kA sus 7Afr.o s.s $-#7stM/n/os /FssiC~nc7 Rewsw/
$ock ess oe/ 3 .ws//,y &twb op Aff /98957.
/aews/.414eks sxt es1 iocur;>9to w As'.r/tcr9 o.e Au-9 t?rs4Fiesras. Ahe 60-CA978 / Ahc .1 den 34 '7Ac Appdesdeassa.n Aywsa> s dx
- /flgttenl $rqui.s/77s v is st/F-Exp94N#7&ey As .Apriaram,
/r~douMwc/aDe EA4tif w/ ken & Tks'or t a c a t it ,, ., sc a,, s-o si..a -csioc ac psebuc asoaas?.ece axe,e-J,, AGwsarsay express /r dwsin-n surcos/ssz &/k ios. .swd 0 Z EI'Y/"gfb lP llA 9 fA5i 1 0 '/t 4""l6, MS
/ 4f' Ci j /P
/ke Dssus, 9sskrri, ears, A7r eraos, us.das, ./ssa cre... go/cs/ asensr, Aywsr> is cahrra l
%se. sorts.u, (d) nze inasmamn,(c) Queir7, ,
@) w 7n orD asz. 7At dis 7c~o w,Gs.ms?% w// At l l
l
xfCf E83-02388% R.1 psgezors e.sto ss s mz#m orAk"way rrs::essidry or irrms, n.vn ex.rueup rica ast wAree s.s7 room ac secep7aele . MAexz 7A xisco,7%z GC-5ifweb
/7/A san // Ar,nerstars rn rde 94 ficM mspreroa Br&ec rd.c irim is ,ws-r.+#ro so br
~
7As wrc7*e .sesy a/rs,*Fr 7Ar Acct,prM/hn eF74e irem & rat wrr,unc> xst. De>9n & :G riz Sp* ectfien s"rErben u.se wi n A E , ora m N TEb /f
. Vrs/Firo Ac .4az/724/c 'Ay Q.C. " TKfewkl l
' .4%eks ser issuzo FAw &cous samt swe+s av sirr . Adv-df Asb q 7Famss/ AAcAs /S.y '
/sfioxs s/AmFsc74xces, 7/pr.s, AxD S7?lss sxe sraxto w Smz Srmt extss D wid sh pA7 sics / iuerawr- 7 nwerrr, Aerz ss q <
deq. Ae AV,ST #45.2. / Ass /y Spa / A rrex 7/o.v sh// Argirr,v W,aeviwg nerfas7t
/vsrRx77eas hie /?rschiy A&D ./Mrdg Aix
$e /csanpsdipmer,
/suesy o asxo y ,ispry ssesgz of /rws.
w x 77 in w 7rs, p ara w,
.mo Akccrer ras shipsir. 7, ac/eing issia:ms s ric Acsspec of Spec /p/ &fMsmwn sA 7dt s i a , a s p z c. ,s / L . r , J INFORMATION 1
f ag
- COPY PPRV Af sdea asseb b e x/< w r a n n e.
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ __ _ -- -- - - - - - r ' - - - --* " ~ " * '"
.o ,. ' COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR) x"U82 -on = = .-
m r A sFE UNIT STRUCTURE / SYSTEM ITEM / COMPONENT TAG /lO NUMBER LOCATION OR EM ON RIR NO i AH 74 km/&r/$1-FIPRCFn $Es e>3&,J/A NONCONFORMING CONDITION e i 8 Z - Ssr A* w
- 8 b
c: REFERENCE COCUA?ENT- [ ~[ .f v8[ O REV I 87I PARA 3
" '"%dL l OE REVIEW / APPROVAL: DATE:
r,2rs 1 / k /h D ACTION ADDRESSEE /) ~ g ~ ['[ DEPARTMENT DISPOSITION: Y c a. . b a ,a r v Wa %.- V REWCRK REPAIR USE AS IS SCRAP W y INFORMATION O COPY I 5
< PPRV ENG. REVIEW / APPROVAL DATE:
/ '/
OE REVIEW APf ROVAL: DATE:
/ /
W' DISPOSITION VERIFICATION & CLOSURE: DATE:
/ /
a >> , j, . _ , e n .. ~ ,r -m y .,y ,,,,,. , ~ ,a__ ,2 ,, n ,=c_,2 , ,,,g _ l l l + . .
a res-c.nees py.ws eAi/r any a .ra-02n.%s' Dspsimo sr ! Act says a acsrs# 7Ermw+/ AdsApcaaca xeor.c g,p-ws, Z>isp.ums .pses swr.8/2e 7e 6<,9e/rment.w" mar /P, Me am/frA,' w WhiEA %~~r!
.dbe1 - s ir.a assaw . S a m a. wea/R,GBMATl0N sus,cip deyzr.maar.are.v s mr.wrry '
d4cA asss .w.F2e7~/$xwacD u e.oce f -40 . 89-60s,aw.arne-r a s 9,ee 4 PEE!
~7Emad Abdes ser a/prames s- Amrc oe,as-p qas Ma n. de 6ed M 2.I h .t faes 3. 4. 7Zr /yplessk seemsn ,eryaaep a rde
/7/nExis/ 76 uwmu is srf-sygeasty. A A swmx*, ,
l ir .sLM mc/aac seg i inseestra ripsvioc 7Fxec.w/ity oftdurtm Aco sk/d'welucc rdzfae'/sse pcwe amsa crmrodze syws/nmy eve &>x/c es,.isrncw asrz.eu/,wo .4a'llirzas saoA ss pipc pipc Strags,,oise nagras, ///c sp-/sp w'us gAshri, vuri,.&/rs sSns, xx4cc, Acss, ea. ~Ypica/ j wSxixariso frjrainzo.a: 60 irre zusaepcs, (8) irre
/Pror/Mes& , M QasW7f, QU .w2??vDcc asc . ~7lc hsrto nemsne w/ Ac usco sr Asxros or/wwwy ascue/iry or was, s"o .rosung rx<s.e asc adzec
. wffsptb M sectfyndb. /s/$zxt 4}pedre, 7bt QC- '
s,pco at aLiu/' Azpzszura , -ric qe ndd wspeer;< &&z -Az ircse is usrr//zo so r4xr
-dzw.spxcria edy Vr'asFy -drocr,orse1/,79 of 7ie ir.cm n,evic uruou usz. %sz;ws /2r rde SpreiMCD M7Beorb use sur// Arf.ctsxi4Tb
.--.c , - . , - - ,e ,,
.. .o see .f85-o.2398$ pqr 3 #5
/r vrenz:o As At:rprx/c Ay GC."7Aac Wkm/
. AbcAs AArissarb [e.e McAl Y/cc72%*/l 755/
/$om. N!& Q Axsb Q TrA/wwx*//bbcks $y
/
1/faws snMMF4erenr<t,17/>cs, Axb .s77/ es AM STEACP /su % SM*AyC ,#Arn xi& /ShysscAl
/Dr,vriftentroc Ti auwrify ARE As &P d /Vs,u-Q.
$x AtGE Af#S. 2. keest /4t "SpecM/.sArt,v77ou . san //
' 8 r g /tr y W ,sn o w n w ) s D e f u 4 rc w s?2Ve w m &
bissbysenbdy Ax dea-spug,sApainr; Ao smeogi or in.s. sis /h&y sW/ fr azywm 75 /Drs?7fy/ //Awfftw, AvD /stSTArt dc S4ipineq
..we/w y ~>io.r,--r7Ae Assr-cc or eacis/
6/ome n ude xeco a speca/ Wre-/.'
. __ !}l' AMA'" -
Af srhex anc47t> m k my&fstavac. INFORMATION l COPY I PPRV 1 l l l l
- - - - - , . . - - - - . - ~ . . - . , . , , - 4 -. 4 e , ,y- , ,- -
. . - . . _ . .. = _ _ , . - - . . _
1- .
\
35 ,,_ l 1 l The foreman's name was i 2l MR. WESSMAN: Does he still work out there? i i I 3 Yes, sir; he works for Tugco. ; I , 4 MR. WESSMAN . If we went and asked him about this, he'd 5 know who told us, of course. , ,, h 6 Yes, sir. 7 MR. WESSMAN: I'm not sure I want to do that. 8 I don't know if he could tell you even j 9 right now who it was that brought it over. I can picture ; I - 10 two people in my mind: .one I can name: the other I can't , f 11 remember his name. He hasn't been out there ,in a little over 12 two years, and I really didn't know him that well at the timd. 13 MR. WESSMAN: If we went and asked this 14 about repairs to the solenoid, would that be likely to reveal ; your identity, or would you prefer that we not go ask him? ; > 16 It would reveal my identity: I don't reall t j 17 have any problem with it. . He'll consider this
~
IS MR. WESSMAN: Let us consider it. , i.
~
ones we're going to consider the other two issues. I think I 19 . s I fs 20 ! wehavesomeadditiona5 evaluation,andweknowwe'regoing - l 1 r
~
to talk to you on that. Now, you said you had some other j *,- 21 , cor.raents on fuse blocks. Let's go briefly en those then. I 22 23 My r.ain issue was in the control room. We 1 24 have non-Q fuse blocks on site, and we' also have O fuse blocks. Between the two, there's no way to identify them. ) 25 : i l
' ~ ~
l p .
. . .. . . . . . \
. . .n 36 -
;- Per.requirementsofES100,weareboundtohavetraceabilityl 2
on all material installed in Q equipment. On-site fuse 3 blocks are--at that period of time we had a buildir.g we 1 4 called our non-Q shack. It had spare non-Q equipment in ~it, ) 5 inasmuch as fuse blocks, breakers, terminal blocks, just i 6 various and sundry types of spare parts. We also had O 7 shack which we stored all of our Q and safety-related' . 8 We were in the process terminal blocks and fuse blocks in. of installing a fuse block in CIO 9 and 10 in the Control G f 10 m:,__ , (Q g i II MR. WESSMAN: Im sorryr CI-? , 12 Yes, sir. It's the last numbers of the > 13
.'_ actual spin nun:bar. I can't actually recall the whole spin
. 14 number.
15 _MR. WESSMAN: Is it a cabinet number? Do you know-
.y 16 MR. JOliNSON: Westinghouse? Or are we talking about ! 17 main control panels?
I j IS They're not main control panels. These, 19 I believe, are in the detection panels. These are manu- f
.I i 20 factured cabinets to process the microprocessors, to contain
'j 21 the microprocessors in the Control Room. Those blocks 22 installed I had a question on inasmuch as whether they ware 23 actually Q or non-Q per the requirements. We were not 24 Provided paperwork other than the general CPO number or the i
\
25 actual generalized sheet as far as the actual purchase order } l e 6
. _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - , _-- __ - -_ _ _ _ - - - + _
n _ 1 sheet to justify the actual part. Like I say, thers was 2 no physical way that you can identify the two between, yet l e' i 3 ig w,ere bound to have traceability, why come up with the I i
- f 4 same sheet and say it's off of this? There's no way I can I 5 -
,,y iges definitely *off of this. Since then, we've gone intc, 6 . a material receipt-type form whereas we have material receipt I
i 7 forms as they're issued from the Q shacks at this time, but-8 MR. WESSMAN: So now there is traceability as far as ., 9 30 Q or non @ r 10 gig'ht. But at that period of time there 11 was a question as fa'r as--inasmuch as we're bound to require-- t 12 ments, yet when you try and force the issue as from the QC i i %' 13 standpoint or try to take a stand on it is--we were always } t 14 given a general decline or whatever, as far as electrical
. 15 engineerings well, it's on this CPO, yet we had no other
- 16 documentation to prove it. A person could have gone down i .
! - to the non-Q shack and gotten it cut of there. T I
i IS MR. WESSMAN: So there could be Q and non-Q blocks !
. I
- 19 mixed in these cabinets-what?--only in the Control Room, i
$ 20 as far as you know?
21 That was only one possibility. It was 22 l just the fact that they would not supply us with an MR. _ 23 . MR. 1.'ESSMAN : I think when you raised this concern, you
- 2. tied it to order 605. Is this the o'nly order that you're .
, 25 awara of? en l
. O e
*+ e-- ess e . *
- gas es y, ,
r- ,-r -,-w e - -+-$ .. -,,,- ,-,-,,-e e,,a ,--,, , --,,,,,n.- - , , , , . . - , , , - - - - . . . , . .
I That was primarily the purchase order 2 utilized in the Control Room. It's under Reliance, as far
- 3 as Reliance-supplied equipment. I 4 MR. JOHNSON: Did Reliance manufacture these detection I
5 cabinets? Were they the vendor? . 6 e The cabinets: I'm not for sure who they 7 were manufactured by. Now, what they had'done is they 8 issued a DCA to say that these cabinets indeed filed up under
..9'. Purchase Order CPO605, as--there are several other cabinets '
10 in the control Room. This purchase order, I went back and n reviewed it at the Warehouse A in Records Receiving there. 12 I had identified it to where they had actually ordered non-13 Q fuse blocks and Q fuse blocks of the same type on the same 14 Purchase order. I was given the statement by Electrical
. ---- 15 Engineering that all the fuse blocks were Q or safety related ,
- 3. to order. -
gq6 l$ j j7 .. MR. WESSMAN: Would you.know that NCR number? Is that y jg one that you could find? l , 19 Yes, sir, I can find that. i ,, . . ._ : I _ t ,o. to ,m d t,.t . . or .s. I 'f 2 21 think we need to go back and look specifically at each of these. As far as you know, we didn't look at any specific l 22 . g NCR on that, Al?
'3
- l l
MR. JOHNSON: **e
- did look at a sample of NCR's for--
24 .
.. ... - : .h.,, b.t w. d. .t - wh.th.r -
. - - - +- --- . .. *
...t 39 -
l 1 i sample included this particular-- i 2 : MR. JOHNSON: I can't answer that questi:n be suse I I . 3 don't know what the number is. 4 4 MR. WESSMAN: I understand. So we don't know; we need
- l cf 5 that specific number from you. hk j
' (
6 . [ okay. , s' l I 7 - MR. WESSMAN: Anything else on those fuse blocks? A1, l 8 do you have any other questions on the fuse blocks?
. 9 -
- MR. JOHNSON ' - Just one question. I'd like to know when 10 you say that the Q and the non-Q fuse blocks--they were '
11 stored together? - 12 No, sir, they were not stored together. 13 They were in different buildings. The non-Q storage build-14 ing was accessible by all. The Q storage building was 15,_l._ through a window-type delivery system. At that period of 16 time there was no material receipts issued on the equipment , 3 1 j- - 37 drawn from there. You could take a traveler or other i
- 18 l documentation as far as an NCR, and go up to the window and j t
; say I need this particular part and they would give it to 19 4
1 I . / i 20 i you, no questions asked. A j 2I MR. JOHNSON: I see. I have no other questions. \f i l MR. WESSMAN: Do you have anything else you want to add 22 . . 23 . while we're on the record?
. Not really. -
24
,5 .. SS _ : ,.t .e s,.re . _ p1. o, ein,s .1 e ,o. ;
. l
- l e
- , __ e -, , , , - , .-, , - - -
--- . e, - - - - - - - - . , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - ~ ~ -
# ymm =. w , . , . - . _ -
# o' . p- *:
v;
. y. .
(,.
. \Qy q, .
Mom ca .s a.s 6. . kc1E-37 d , . m \ AP s:ati n Catecery: Electrical and Instrumentation 5, Elegtrical *
~lar.::rfernance Report (NCR) Activities (
- , AQE-25*, AQE-33, j Alle:a: Ton Number: AQE-1, AQE-2, AQE-3, AQE-4, AQE-M, AQE-35,( AQE-37 ) AQE-38, AQE-40, AQE-41, AQE-42, AQE-45, AQE-47, j JE-48, AE-24, and parts of AE-22, AE-27, AQE-12, AQE-36 and AE-50. l Characterization: It is alleged that the validity of the generation and 55 R-7 disp:sition of electrical nonconformance reports (NCRs) was suspect.
a 49 IsesseentofSafetySionificance: The implied safety significance of these allegations is that the quality of the electrical installation ecu'.d be indeterminate, i I
!* a::t ':n to these ;e .eral cencerns, several allegations c:r .a'ra ,
s s:"ic 'r.fer:a-icr. at;oct questionable NCR disposi:.icns, wt.'ch 1.:h.cas: a
- Disnosition of ACR on terminal block rework was questior.able MES'7 g(AQE-37)D ,
7g
- To address the specific technical concerns raised in the.above allega-
- tions, the TRT examined the NCR log books, interviewed allegers, and.
selected a random sample of NCRs pertaining to specific items of concern. The TRT determined that: 1 I
- The allegations of improper documentation of cable removal (AQE-1 and AQE-2); repair rather than replacement of flex concuit '
(AGE-3); damaged cable as a result of a fallen cable tray (AQ-24);
. failure to follow procedures.and sp'ecifications (AQE-25 and AGE-4_0);. 53ER-7.
- dacaged cable due to inadequate. thread enoacement on a conduit-(AQE-45); and rework of terminal blocks [(AGE-37))could not be substantiated, since in its review of a fandes Taeple of 75 NCRs on
]Q thess issues the TRT could not identify any inconsistercies er defic'encies that would raise a safety question. Thesa fir.d'r.gs ,
we e discussed with seme of the individuals respcnsible #:- raisir.g
-htst cencerns one of wh disagreed with the TRT ceta- 'r.atter.
c: :e- .inf ACE-37Vnd provided acditier.a1 infomatice.. -re 7;T is c; rt tly eilaiuaGcg this r.e,< information Eric will r's;;;rt t .e res.1:s in a supplement to this SSER. o F01A-85-59 3
~
~
, .s *- . . . .
-[ . ,
j . , , l ., ' i.
*4
' 'itJ dit + 8'd.d.d+$*.als IN t" @ !a.
's,gg.,,, *(+, . , , qg gp, g ga, y.,,. e gg, g y , , ,
8
. r.
1 m .
,m- _ .
%h.n.f ." l . .
. -, \[ 3 ) g[ .
t
$ ~. r
- ~ -
t ~
- ,/ , s ,, i. .,.J, s
s , is Conclusions and Staff Positions: Based on the reviews of the pertinent
)
cocumentation, examinaticr. of NCRs, and the information obtained frorr. the interviews, the TRT concludes that adequate procedures, controls, and process checks exist fer tra generation and disposition cf reported items
-of nonect-formance as related to the concerns raised by the above a legan :.s. The TF.T a*:s: c:n:ludes that of the allegations ider.tified
- a. the ca set cf this se:ticn, only a few specific instances were four>d which raised questions cor.cerning the adequacy of safety-related item. M{ Q *7 These are discussed above and are discussed further in other sections of the report. *
--s A"- *v The results of this evaluation will be further assessed as part of the overall prograc:matic review of all NCRs addressed uncer QA/QC Category 5, "Nonconformance Reports," and under QA/QC Category 6 "QC Inspection."
Therefore, the final ac:e:tability of this evaluation will be predicated on the satisfactory res.lt cf the overall prograre.atic review en these se:Je:ts. Ar.y ad.'u:t s : : these conclusie .s v'11 te -t::-tei '*. a s.;:la e : o -r.ts iii e -t s el t s :, f tha 7 7 ~ ' .
- e . ; f r.e .. - f o rr.a-tion cc-:erning alie:at'c .s A0E-34, AQE-35 anc(AQE-37).ill also be
- reportec in a suppler.er. tc this SSER. d ; WWE9E tat.E T)ocd M EuTb -l ,
- i. u c.e. uo. m -osz.39y. 12 / 14 '/ B'5 Mcu.M 2 nv !. A .e.#
O v- H 4 s . 24 - 4 oWc. , o c.j{ 40 IW 3,%ad)u q
%Me'd6w.E2 l 4Ad 6k.a4.Qvw.eA M.
i y 0.P- % 9- G,
- 92. , %.( s J. A . _
N Lik:; e b I
*
- n
. g
- , . * , . = * ., :. ,.,;, .
f-f";,*"e. S, A
~,.',.* ,
*.,e d ,, .%
4 , .
* * +* s k .._ - _ _ _ _... _ ._ _ _ _ _ , , , _ . _ _ _ _ , _ , , , _ , , ,
p ,
-.- < e % w. . y-g ' -
. , p'. . - s l: . , . . .
c;:. . .. .
- cl g -
- - /
IN k EN)iid d h S M M6 d Yb '- i i f . A f. y' )k /'. 5 ' m /Y. - [ fn44hl
.1
.,:2 .. -. pf:
7 . .t M.!'.f - Q f th Ai @ (C. . O ~ ,e u S g , Q,ggy n g is , N{ ', M '/ 'i ' J 8
's IA M Gr - 'N '
\c*W o rj \
- f s % , ~, S- .Y. ' , s,. Q,.( 4 ,4 ( t.,,,
4 q , {d o yng W d eu.- x n . 9. ./ . r. (Lg,y t k t 5,t v <{ tt 1 1 . . .' , g . t
% a t ,_ w mm ;%,4 : M %s.
we <. CL(,, \J t "b b 't b(
- h C W. LA.Yt T .L 'N N '
e p c.s a o,so [ uk, .e.x ww . a-b-tm) k At.#t.) \ Ad hI.c
\ u
<- 4 I - -
g y y.e., s bV4 W 4.GY \l-f Y .. C-k]* M ,
\y T A^.b SQ. o 5 v". !,A C % 4d
/C.2 M (YiY\ t - .
AC 1.A ' i O. -
\>Yhi
~
\ NS \M VJL CA- Y\,(, -
us a tv-r-c W gcu INa i k' uJ C4 Of.H.,y vu c. l.A vt N A ' i m vv-4 , e c ? - wF -(p v.m v' .yoc m o ~s
,(. \ ys' t.,U t, . *
- C4 5 (IQ N6 k Sb.s F w a s ' adm ^
~
- s]e L r -
o'
. , } , i, , ' '
i '- ,,,O .', '... .- 1,. " ;'
..,: h .- . ,.::.,.. , . . , _ . _ , .
. >s. ,-
. . - . * ' ' *k . .'*
[' , , ' .< . ' - ... - ..
,, ,., -(' .,,.)-
,*l.,,
r mw- - = _._..;,.. _, ,. m e . _ _ . - _/, ,,,,,.., _ , . , _ ,
,.n ,
. ,;, .,gc; .
;p ., .'
...a'.,,
QcQ,g
.. . - \/3, ..
7 m . E - 37 k C.< bv n v ta.I h - G ewm Mkt bo
- o. n[
u m ' J se ckuy4 a C - S W-(,e ) 3 L w u ,c skvhu.@ ne ad L en 3 mv r 4,c a m J ocml D b ' Aca TR J
-se w e.- 64 w.-# AJ 3; v9 wes At d
. 4 T a p&,%c 4 ( utT3 a m tb d
.mLeL c I N 4. M L5 >
Vt. Ll" iN a p(A 't i vt, .. \hL
- d. +t.ib (
L n b 'tvn.cVtI 4. w f/ u.h twI MC.R E 63 -O 32 39 ce.w.
" b '
ca. g 6, % _ I 1- \e . .
\S ls) % tt ---- --
9 ' \w 6
- 558 cls [LuJ2.0.0 $ -
s R E B'5 vs/> b)u.R,. c Ae l'S~Z.3- } ' n ,a-Qs
't% .
vjee o ( c.ovtu.v n ek
.h i ey> ctde.I.u
.t% {
k.g. - g- *fy. '\ ~. '
, ,_ y _ .. . :
G r WP-( p A vo v * 'kg'
'IwN .
4 ,, t ,1 m' y~ t< v 3 o.SaR ' / . C9 *o S P -(.y c0.t h c.h ' on .TE.d " ~ b b_ 6%u.0 t w' c x.c. u c c k e - a _. td,W. S 4 C re>c e.e c S.w vt C. 9 - C. ? u \o -\ 3 w
'A c, :d hb% At' w r. 'ec.kb is nob .
h '% v-Cec d ' '.b4 My b u 'T '
.$e w. . .hiJ.9
- r y'%. . yY. .'; '; .. ..y['
. ;. 5l%...
o %3.s . J A. : . f ;..; . m w ;;.;.: '.,'.
.u. :. .
[.. .a -
'::.; * .ii ^.. Cs' ..
( .. .:W;.l;.::~:,;. J'r r % -N'6"a ? A * .%.' , inf .a.. ar= *. Asy se f =. %.; ..w.; [wg.mq, g,fm, ,,,,m m,gm
.. , , - ,1 .~, , , . . - - -
' ~'
Y\ ;
*. Y s' '
, y . i'i *v A:
}
~.***.**,%
s .
- A '
f Qt~67 m j Cm m m6 )
- if
/\/., b 0 h vcmin d.cm. <d N.> b v4m +.4 . -e cP5es s%A. 2. p a uinds k wl W u . c. R , 0.t w h c. 9%
sme Nt% AvJc.ad.mLS whtkE1, , F^b d 4. c n b% k m.sw to ~ wk cd c u ' D. c
}
%C. ,
qvm.th . <LLL,.,rn.M e s\d. p (J)
.& A R
Asgh O tm C,</v1 m aw.c_c p cA.4 w Wb b k L.m c.c.,v- n. s wcu.J h.o A% V& L o . . %. g Llb N[hO / M
<1- . .
D' 5 s; ..
- e','
*, .... . , , .g. g. .;- ' , ..
f ,: ,, ** *; .,'.s,, 6 g, ' .-
. . ., , 4 , ', f ,, ,* ;,, ,* *
, ..,._ e,, fe. , , ..,
,..T. .
,5
.s.
'r. e
,.).. . * ' . , . ' ,' *' ~ * ' , . ,,/., ,' .,.;.
e g,. .*.' , . .
' '
- 3 e, f * '
l:g * .; j,; .
, . ., .s
, l ' t' * ' *
[' , , , .=,7 , , , , J* www.+w e. e g ,_ - su-- m . x-m m.m a g.sg m,; s,h.,, . , , , , , . . , , . ,
. m '., y _. y._,
m - - --- m.
*M
-TEVJ UTIUTIES COMANCHE - - PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC . . . .-
STATlQN -* '
;%^[ 80ihadtNo 'Co.
- l NCl No " -
i N NCONF,OR'MA'NCE RENORT,-(NCR) . '-
,-l,, ,
RBRT I off Q - j UNIT l STRUCTURE < SYSTEM ITEM / COMPONE N T TAGilO NUMBER LOCATION OR ELEV'ATION Ala NO. t
, c surtoenas cpc L no Awg 1
'N e 1 w , w e Lp tilA M/n
,- NONCONFORMING CONDITION Tid , ,
!.P-('Wgb.lo"1hyn
- mNh A 00 Mab ( fi y)?-w -. o *wtuu. w& Ob b cA.s.- t.dtvkwn TiNiORMATION %%.y Cem9rn M 0 W7 al 8!
s- . COPY 11 PPRV 3
- ,1 o REFERENCE 00COMENT. o -CPAf-6.lo /dP SAP REv -
G m/9 ,,nA s 4,Tne REPORTEO BY: DATE:
-]> m -
i' REf5- l2ilSR8
'O-EVIEW/AyP OVAL: DATE:
w' l d4<4/AR $ idt 5 i/E i h O ! AC'fiON 4 ORESSEE . OEPARTMENr I 07' [*l.N_b OtSPOSITION: , REWORK REPAIR USE AS IS U SCRAP t . No procedure violation exists as the work was performed under the direction of d Startup, and Startup is not responsible for the implementation of B&R procedures.
$ C?M 6.10 does not apply to work performed under Startup's direction.
w C g 4 2 f ARMS QA RECORD RTN. QA REVigw 1NDU.7uo - c civim . . 8 - - nor NO. . k DATEe SUSFILE NO.
- H 13-63a3 9 ENO. REVIEWi DA v
Re29eIAPP OVALmm.ix-n<e . IUlYhi rx vc.m 7 laJlT:i85 , w
~3 u1/
~
lN Y lE O OtSP654 TION VE lbAT ' CLOSURE: " ' ' ' ' " DATE:
,f A- "M M J+.- \
llYi D . _ f COMMENTS: C l Q ' Mg ,' gg ggy jy jp,,g . . fittit ' .
. r ," ,
1
.. ., ,; ,,- .i .. .' .
.,. ..,f ,
L., * .. i .~; . . M. .c :, -
~,, % .
Qi ,g, ', ..- .. e . * ; ,l ;,,-
, ~,~ ;
.:l.,y , , ,
, ,, s
. .- .,,, , , . .,.',.., ..., ;c,. ,
1.
- i. 8 , g de n Amte gaJMiss** *
- 1 M - 1 '#~ 'b'8 I *
. . , . n.
p
- 8. ..
%u:m : a. v.
.e + . .
....t, r . .
?' hcee83-o3239 past aorn OF-$AP-6 Prv 9 puo x1 lsra aTuP w/osk J..
... %nmar- Docum. cur on 3iriarco 'By 9c.c l *
$rnarap kr $p set r>i MrEP-By~$TEP iivsrauction rsa implemenrwy waan ano IDENTIFY skgp1Cnon,,
RETEST AND $ Aftry RtqusRtMENTd . E$$u.ANCC of A , 4WP Aurisoarest Tiu:. ;sprerFic Wo'nk. 'G 'Bt pekFsamza CP- S A P-6 h v 9 paa n 4. i.2 'ZF n Qap// 77 Chsxperwsne of A 0mportrNT on ,$7STtM will '8x Eazac.h tv Ey won 1< Ta % c p xR Fo n m tb Aub rhe gunfiry ChnRacTre/gric wi// Nor- Br-VERIFito By guegEfugArr $7A~ RTu.p T1sTm3, RtinjipecToon w i ll E2. ENsuRtD %y I S S U. I M Itus ezc.rch ~ Irem. uzmoval Nonce (xRM)Q pza AN B 4 R pacestaat CP- CPM (o . to -1, a M W P on Mn R 1n Acconynnetwrrh rhi.s paoegouez .' OP- CPM & .to Mv to onna .o..o. <1 (nor;e y
,,AN I R N r$ +<pa gaz.c> s vers uA en
.A $ W A on % WP hn;s' Exts isgu.s.t>.
. A Cone /icr msr* Berwtcw.cP '%A'P-G ~Rev 9 ano. CP-CPM -C..so ~Rev 1o. C P .5 A P G Dos's '
Ajor Az9aint RN IRN to B e } $ 5 u r o / r . % y. s r z m Rerzsr will Be Accompligh ca. OP-l'PM grms rhnr nu ERN i$ Rz7aineD sw 1 IMh8MFBIW ?^ swn- copy
~
. ". PPRV: ..
.s .:. . s .: .
- .,. c . . . a. .s. .
. . w.
....' ...n. ..
3.. .. + ..
- . *rf Is . ' 5 *U *8 **JS Dief*f.h' d ' $. *s.s*f.;,= * *Nf',1..*@( .*td**. r'.OhW1 8. 4 F j Q bl.Pe'.f' f* * *B*194)h".*d})b. hgs.%M.s h%). .3 ' d.s iltMWed%.N a *s4..* '.M 6 9 4 4-2._ _
zyy _ _
.? . -- ~ .
- M t 91, . . % ..
s
. ,. -. ' , s-
,Amgq e.e v.
;m,% w., .
M,. , .'. 9 .- ' w y r .-:
.~. ,.
gp;33p;,, w, c - e w Ravis'icn 9' - 34r .' ' Pair,e 3 o( '17 o Inter'im Change
+c . 10/24/83 M CONTROL OF WORK ON STATION COMPONENTS
. AFTER RE1. EASE FROM COIISTRUCTION TO TUGC0
. . ... .c -
Ey. ) : . a .. I 1.0 PURPOSE < The purpose of this procedure is to establish the methods to be used by TUCCO to; 1.1 Authorize work to b'e performed on structures, systems and/or components after custody has been transferred to TUCCO per CP-SAP-3; s 1.2 Ensure that adequate safety precautions have been taken prior to work being performed; 1.3 Identify required retesting; and 1.4 Document satisfactory completion of work authorized and associated retesting. e 2.0 APPLICABILITT The' requirements of this procedure apply to work performed.on station components after custody has been transferred from construction to TUCCO g Startup. If custody of components or systers is to be returned to a r n .i. , contracew- Gr performance of work, the requirements of CP-SAP-3 shal'1 apply in lieu of this procedure. 7 .. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Startup Work Permit (SWP) - Document originated by TUG 0 Startup that
~
specify step-by-step instruction for implementing work and' identify .
. inspection.. retest and safety rdquirements. Issuance of a SWP
+ . authorizes the specified work to be performed.
x ~,~ ~,,._ 3.2 Startup Work Authorization (SWA).- Document that may 'ce originated by B&R to request authorization to perform work or by TUCCO Startup to authorize work. .
.. 1 3.35 Maintenance Action. Request ,'(MAR) . A ' standard TUGC0 document used. to .
initiate, control and document maintenance work and inspections which'
.~, must be performed on .s.tation equipment by TUGC0 personnel.
- g. ,
4.0 PROCEDURE y 4.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS The System Test Engineer (STE)' vill be responsible' fer g, . 4.1.1 re: processing SWP's, SWA's and MAR's in accordance with this 1.' . procedue and to monitor and coordinate the associated work .
~
activities, including requests for vendor assistance, equipment operation and placement of safety . tags to get the work .
. completed.- ,
., .s. _. ,
.u.: ..- .
c .- . . . . ,
.---- n. - -
w. g7.p. 7.:" N6 .J, _ VM. . e
- m. y .
. . OR liWORMAT10N.DU
.. . . r. ,. .. .
. Ni
- s. . - -
T_SW s . ! w n.w., m ~ehe-ow*mnage am eWAsm v s.w dhew N % k y.sv.mebs%csdoar"$@A* ' m '+' d *-
m ~ . . -e -.
,- na: in - .a, n ,-
~
3'. . r -
. C F-SAF:-6 .
gj ::7' c '
. . ,m . , .
* ?
j , ,j - - - ~ - ' . ~ ;ggyg,$ca. p .
~' ' -
~ -
,pp s -Q ^ -
.? 3C .
- Notes ;
I (1) A SWP should generally be used . i; . when the work activity is in- , 5 itiated by startup personnel and there are no existing Engineer-
$ ing/ Construction procedures that can be used to implement the work. .
(2) A SWA should generally be used ) when a system / component clear-ance (safety tag) and retesting is required after the work is complete. All work authorized to be performed by a SWA vill be performed in accordance with normal construction and inspect-ion procedures. 4.1.2 If a quality characteristic of a component or system vill be it breached by work to be performed and the quality characteristic-vill not be verified by subsequent startup testing, yi reinspection vill be ensured by issuing an Inspected Item Removal Notice (IRN) per B&R procedure CP-CPM 6.10-1, a SWP or . MAR in accordance with this procedure. 4.1.3 To assure adequate work control and material c'raceability, a f SWP or a' MAR will be processed in accordance with this D J procedure when the following types of work are initiated by
- 'TUGCO Startup: .
t Not~es (1) The instructions on the back of the traveler form are not appli - cable. (2) If the work.,can be perfo'rmed and ' documented'in accordance with. *
. normal engin'eering'or construc't- . .
ion p'rocedures'it is NOT. mandatory '
- for a SWP or a MAR to"be issued h
- ~ also. ' However, a SWA may be re-quired to authorize the work , and/or document required recests. . , ,pv s .
~ * '
. -- . 9. . . -
kn ..- D.#O ',*, ,.,
.AFOR 39- - .,
, ; ,' ,. .INFORMATION 0.NIN.. ' . ^ .
.j .,.
. , , g ,__1 3 - . . . . . ,
h s.% s .a2a_ __._._. ... . . . _ . _ . ...,_,_,,,,_;.,;,,. ,, % eL. , ,_. s
g- w . . . . . -
.c er m ' n; -- w:.n o
.g g -_ .
., '.. b nm 3 > ..
~
.)V
~!
- g. -
26;, g.y .: 'l I would imagine' the' Bisco seal is ba'ck in. 2 MR4 JOllNSON: Is this an area where the post-constructi on 3 procedure has been implemented and the building management 92 2- 4 organization having turned this over? go,", ( ,- 5 Yes, sir. V 6 MR. WESSMAN: Let's go off the record for a moment. I (A discussion was held off the record.) 4 S MR. WESSMAN: While we were off the record, we explored 9 a little more fully the details of IE Notice No. 84-47. It . 10 turns out we were in error when we said earlier that this y; IE Notice was in part contributed to one of the concerns 12 raised by Though the IE Notice concerns 13 terminal blocks, there is no relationship between this par-34 ticular IE Notice and any of the concerns on the terminal
- bl eks that were raised by
. 15 While we were off the l gg record, we also discussed ~AQE 37 which concerns a paperwork z
\
j
;- conflict regarding rework of terminal blocks. So we have gg our notes correct, would you tell us a little bit more about k g9 that one, if you could, and what you found, so we ::an p
20 expl re that one a little more fully, h@, -
^; 21 What we had was a case where we had a
=
broken terminal block in tihe motor control center. There
.a. i -
Dn ~ 23 was an 1;CR that was written on the terminal block and what I
.w: g : .
r , {
;- ~
we were going to do in actuality to correct the problem. u 2s-The start-up engineer had issued a z series traveler. It's J
. l-r.
- ';. : .: {-
;, - 0. .. .y
, : .g ly.
.:~....=. ..t
, .,* ; ' ;: r ,: ' .' .. :
J 'l "g B a
. - . - . , . - ~ ~ _ = - -
= - - - ~ + ' ~ - - - - - ~
- .-- p s,
- 4 u. .. . " . * ,. -
4 ygy * -
. .n . '~t yo- 2y , >
g 1 ,j j atravelerproducedbyStart-up,-notElectricalEngineering.l - [ p, 2
.In accordance with the regular electrical procedures, we had I
j 3 to have an IRN issued in order to remove fuel-l'anded cables I h(e i l
@- 4 off the terminal block in order to. replace it. It wound up l ~.
l
, 5 being a forced issue as far as the Start-up did not have to '
6 comply with the regular procedures inasmuch as they did not 7 i require an IRN to perform their work. SAP 6, which is their i S procedure as far as related to this type operation actually I - 9 states that an IRN is requii ed. We werb told that this was , i l 10 related only to mechanical problems, not electrical, but yet 11 an example actually given in the SAP 6 is directly--even j g L 12 gives the example as a terminal block which was kind of f W( 13 ironic. We wrote two NCR's and one six- to seven-page RFIC z 14 I over this incident. g h" 15 MR. WESSMAN: What is an RFIC7 16 It's a Request for Information Clarification.'
- I 17 This was sent to Quality Engineering, based on as far as . i. IS ' ' does Start-up actually abide by our procedures and if not, l .; 19 what other procedures do we inspect by other than the ones d -
J j. 20 we have. The RFIC was answered. I went through and I 6 z.~ . O 21 ann tated as far as what actually--just for my own reference-- t [ 22 i ann tated what actually occurred, and the way the thing was i 23 j answered was pretty erroneous as far as what took place. h-
- MR. WESSMAN: Is this RFIC available, or do you know.
24 25 where it is, or is there a serial number or something on 'it lrs
. <.. , ,u) v, 7 --
- m .,. .,; , ,
. s. ,, ,
.. ., 7 -
'., 3
. . s .
- . %*" A *g 6 .%'054%% .%%$ 8%% * %;* Q i pt. %%4,5cW% hye6 J.-E L s-- s-a a y[ ue.
- @ M M N'D
~
*Y
bgc-p -- a . I h-h ._. ' to whara 93 M uld'get access to it? 2 [ .as, it. is, I can also provide you with ( w-3 that. N :
- p. 4 MR. W$SSMAN: If you could find out that information'or
- n. .r .
IE ... 5 get us a copy and the serial nu=bers of the two NCR's, that 6 W(- [,* - would allcw us to 'look at the entire trail of this activity.
- n. s ,.
7
~, 7 Would there be other information besides what's in those tvia 8
documents that we should look at? . t
., 6 9
I tried to'obtain the z traveler nu=ber l 10 itself. I was not able.. to obtain that number as far as on c - i' i 11 general research. ' \ t,
)'
}(
12 MR. WESSMAN: Do you know how we' might find it "or who 13 we would ask or-- -l 14 The only way is possibly tracking back to j i 15 the terminal block itself and then trying to trace it back ' 16 from there. I can identify what compartment and what block {. 17 it is. j. 18 MR. WESSMAN: Okay. If we have that much, let's see , { 19 what we can find; and the two NCR's and RFIC;. We'll see if ,.~. .
=- .
~i 20 we can examine the whole story; -
21 So up to date right now, to my knowledge,
- 22. the documentation shows that those cables had never been
}
t y, , - 23 lifted, yet you have a new terminal block there to where you j yr 24 just have a complete blatant violation of procedures. This l
-O was a problem, a long-time problem., that we had had with i
o5 1 l: [ l -
- ? r
.. . =
.,,-)* ,
'. . . , . . ,, i
'4
.r."
P., : .:'
. ,. -e. . .: -
n ., ,,
'7- ' / ..
~ ~
,S ,
.- x .
'""'m -
...s., 3; .,.,sk.,Q,st,x,,m.,,,,,s.,%,...3,...,,,,s..x,.,,,,,,,,,.,,,,3;,,..,33,,,m.,,,,,.,,,..s.m.,,,,,,,,,,,.y
. ..s,3,,,,,,, ..,4.c,.,,#.. .,
y...,,. m ,; m. m- ,, .- -
- . ~ . - -
~. *
(ih.) .-
., s , ,
1 .S tart-up. ' This was --just on ..on.e of the issues that 've'. tried . 2 to force with them. Ne fought it, and we won in a way; we 3 lost' in a lot. at that time had also stated--now, 4 this was through they worked together on this l i 5 problem; we went to meetings on this thing, for almost a week, 6 was. going to revise SAP 6 to clarify this conflict ' 7 of documentation we had between the Start-up procedures and S the actual construction-quality control procedures. It 9 never was clarified. At that time the NRC agent that we had ; 10 on site--I forget his'name; it was right before b 11 MR. hTSSMAN: There were two gentlemen named
. .:5]
12 and 13 was also involved on
- 1. - this. After left the. site, this whole subject 15 ,
was dropped. 16 MR. WESSMAN: About' what time did this all take place? 37 That was around November, Dececher of '83. p 1 33 MR. JOHNSON: I was going' to ask you if SAP 6 even
; 19 gives an example of a . terminal block which . requires an IR::,
I ' 20 Item Removal Notice. What did they substitute in lieu of an
}$ .
V i ' 21 ; IEN7 }
- b. ' h
! e 33 h.BIELSS Nothing.
~
3 MR. . JOHNSON : Okay. You indicated that the broken .
.y terminal block was in an N Could you identify which NC
. 25 that was? Or a traiti green or orange?
?
. . Y f- , *
~
<~' , * * , , ,.
'.' ~ ~ . : **.- 4-
's ,! . .
., ? a
,, ~ : ,
~- f *
,. ,. .. s
*, -, , . . t.. . . - . - , .
a ,r.
- w. -m.w .e s.*.s, m... msg,..m.a.,. rm.pm ,., w.m m,. .c .s 3.w e., wsy.. .: .m ns~r . . .ssm,. 9 . , s s. . .~.- ~ - c. a -
e.
y , . . . ,,, -- -
..=
L - . Y .L 'j
, . 3f: ev I At this - ti.T.e ~I ^couldn ' 1t honestly say.- ,
2 MR. WESSMAN: 3 .:: tha NCR's would tell us that. 1
- I 3 Yes, they will. ,
i' 4 MR. JOHNSON: I'm just looking for a, clue for where to I
-5 start. gg, '()
6 MR. WESSMAN: Let's wait until alls us with the I 7 NCR nu=bers. If you get a chance in the next couple of days 8 to go back, then call us either later this week or the first i 9 of next week. We'll give you some phone numbers. You can ],c, 10 call us collect and tell us what you're able to find on that,' - 1 i 11 and then we'll quietly go in and do some more inspecting. ,
-1.' .
12 okay. [
, 13 MR. WESSMAN: I think that's the best way to go about it.'
[
- i
\
l'4, Okay. Anything else on this issue? ir.~~ 15 MR. JOHNSON: On this particular issue, no. 16 MR. WESSMAN: I think we've covered the concerns that 1 Ly l- 17 you raised for us back last April and clearly, we've t- , li 15 ; 9ot two out of the six where you've helped us discover j - 19 there's some more.we*can look at. ,
- f. - .-
ik
.k 20 Ther'e's'on'e more. ..- I) j 21 MR. WESSMAN: Okay. ,
l 22 On your solenoid: I'm not really for 93 sure what you have on your writeup for that, as far ac what ; g e . f I stated. . i L 34 P MR. WESSMAN: We didn't have a lot of detail on that, j
. 25 .
i 3 . .
., . . g
- r;.
, . i.' .- . .
t -,. w
....f.. . ,
.i- -
.v.
.*G. - ., ,. . . *'
- . . .r- .: ,.
. 2:* .
. n, . ..
.. j I."'***'*'*N te...,,w., , , , , ,,, ,, g.,g,g, .g,,,g g ,,,,,,,ggg,, g g ,, g,s ,, y ,,_,g.,,.g.}}