ML20137E687
| ML20137E687 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 12/07/1984 |
| From: | Noonan V NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM) |
| To: | Philleo R, Vietti A, Zudans J NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20136F037 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8601170298 | |
| Download: ML20137E687 (62) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:u.,....,... u. O.v. ~:p. .} - : ~~ ' I '..,'; *; !. 4 [c k, ~u' ITBD sThTES ' ~' N g
- e.E 1
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -{, ,I wAsmucToN. O. C. 20555 \\...../ DFC 7 1984 l oocket Nos.: 50-445/446 DO NOT DIS 10SE MEMORANDUM FOR: See Attached List FROM: Vincent S. Noonan, Project Director Comanche Peak Technical Review Team
SUBJECT:
TilANSMITTAL' 0F ' ACTION ITEMS AS DELINEATED' IN TRANSCRIPT OF MEETING WITH MSN NOVEMBER 7,1984-On November 7,1984 members of the staff met with Enclosure.1 is a transcript of the meeting. Topics scusse y e sta f at the meeting were in the Civil / tructural Mi ell neous, Electrical and Test Programs areas. In addition, raised several concerns. delineates actions that the staff must take as a result of this meeting. Also provided are the transcript page numbers that focus on the particular action item and responsible persons. Please followup on these action items and. provide A. Vietti with your results no later than COB December 14, 1984.. 1 / s ona. Project Director amanche P ak Tehhnical Review Team . ~ rn y p.y e n . E "- L i 'y-d,: ' i,/ e.gl ',O s w f { i-I.j# I l ) / B601170298 851213 PDR FOIA l GARDE 85-59 PDR l
.s-. ~.... ...,. _...e. r,.. ".... .L.,..... .~. ' Addressee List J. Zudans A. Vietti R. Philleo L. Shao. ~ -.J. Calvo R. Keinig W... Smith D. Hunnicutt R..Bangart H. Livemore R. LaGrange t. D. Terao J. Gagliardo I \\ I d ~ . j* O e l Y j t n e a ~ r p e,
. 5 '.;*' k.* *.' '.. .~ ' ),' .,',.f..,,._ 7 i ,1 .T D0.NOT DISCLOSE. [ Transcript Responsibility Action Items Pages 1. Review for information discussions 9,90,106 H. Livennore on QA/QC failures in areas of: Civil / Structural Miscellaneous Electrical 33-35 Test Programs 66 2. Look at the designed and installed 25,76-77 R. Bangart supports for HVAC system ducts irt containuent. (Sppcifically, vertical and laterals) 3. Determine the temperature equipment 28 R. LaGrange inside containment is qualified to withstand. 4. Investigate CSB procedure for reviewing 59-64 A. Vietti/CS8 containment integrated leak rate testing 5. Investiga,te inspections and reports 78-79 A. Vietti/VIB s. issued by the VIB on CP vendor Bohnson Co. 6. NCR E-81-00088, dated 3/25/81 79 J. Calvo FA (AE-55) (document provided) 7. Case Exhibit 658 (AE-56) 81 A. Vietti/J. Calvo wdu/ (Locating through PDR) l 8. Check if when CP used 2500 psi concrete 87,91 L. Shao I strength mix did the analysis reflect 2500 psi or 4000 psi 9. Visit plant site to see what actions 114' L. Shao l the applicant has in progress on the control room ceiling Action /Information
- 10. Check if Gibbs 1 Hill used a 115-119
-L. Shao/D. Terao 1.5 factor in all static load calculations (if not why didn't .p Cygna notice in their review.) C a [ .~ ~ m .... i
o Do NOT DISCLost f 2-I Transcript Responsibility Action Items Pages Action /Information
- 11. Check if in containment allowable 119-122 L. Shao/D. Terao stresses go beyond yield for cable tray supports.
(TU used.a generic . design with al.lowable stresses for the auxiliary building contrary to FSAR comitments.) (Cygna did not address) Action /Infonnation
- 12. Check if when TU attached their cable 124 L. Shao/D. Terao trays to the support and structural steel, they drilled a hole through the flange of the channel which reduces the section modules which has not been i
accounted for in calculations. Check some of the cable tray supports in the field. (Cygna did not address)
- 13. Liner Plate 127 L. Shao
~
- 14. NCR on a 10 CFR 50.55(e) that 138 L. Shar TU did not report. (Information transmitted from Gagliardo to l
L. Shao)
- 15. Crack in the basemat (AC-44) 148-166 L. Shao (documentation duringmeeting)provided
- 16. Specific problems with concrete 167-169 L. Shao (documentation provided during meeting)
- 17. Minimum wall violation for piping 171 L. Shao (AP-29) (documentation provided at meeting)
- 18. ANI Reports 174 H. Livennore/
(documentation provided at meeting) L. Shao (if needed)
- 19. Package fro rece.ived L. Shao 12/4/84 a f 8
e s -S-9
- M msnm. M e me"*
e # 9 8 h 4 e e +
- "~ ~ g s d '4 ' ~" s Elactri' cal Allegction Raview Categorics f/17/JY ., - Category Est. Handays Allegation Packagd Assigned Schedule No.. _Subj ec t to Complete Nos. Prepared to 03 Close Remarku c. !? Electrical Cable-(AQE-7 part). (AQE-Marini 7/31/84 Terminationg 8 part), AQE-12 AE-13.'AE-16, AE-18 AE-22. AE-26,.AQE-36, (AQE-37 part). (AQE-39 'part), (AQE-46 part) ~ 2-Electrical Cable Tray (AQE-3 part). (AQE-4 part), Myers 7/31/84 ~,. and Conduit Installation AQE-10, AE-14. (AE-24 apart), AE-27, AE-29. AE-31, AH-14 '3 Electrical Equipment AQE-6'.AQE-11. AE-15. Johnson 8/4/84 Separation AE-20. (AQE-44 part), and Li AQE-49. AE-51, AE-53 A4(-r+ 4-M.m - ((~ ~. Control Room Ceiling 9 AE-17 Hyers 8/10/84 Fixture Supporta [ [ Electrical NCR Activities .AQE-1, AQE-2, AQE-3 Selan' 7/30/84 l' ~ AQE-4. AQE-5, (AQE-12 or White j. part). AQE-25. (AE-22 and Laudenbach part), AE-24, (AE-27 part). AQE-33, AQE-34, ? ' '.e AQE-35,.(AQE-36 part). I AQE-37, AQE-38. AQE-40, J CAQE-41 pa 4 AQE-42, LQE-45, AQE-4 " AE-50 (ArtJ)7, AQE-48, u,,c w e, ;
- ~
c
- %*2
't e. %,,,P 3 d' ' ' 1, I I l. / i#
- i i
s b 9 9 e
w a..- l[nfi+- ,9. I,,I'. Electrical Allsgetien Review Categories (continuzd) 8' Z 7((f- ~/, ." Category S Est. Handays Allegation Package Assigned Schedule cNo. Subject to Complete Nos. Prepared to Open Close Remarks 'O Elenie .W.'d ElectricalQb (AQE-4 part), AQE-6 Selan 7/26/84 Inspector Training / part),AQE-8,"(AQE-12 and White, Qualifications part) p a. nian.k i2 otann , f. t 1, [ [ Electrical Cable Installation (AQE-5 part), AE-19, Marini 7/31/84 AE-28, (AE-29 part), AE-30 AE-50, SRT-10 ~ n
- 51. s
,,,MV' [" Electrical Procedures (AQE-6 part), (AE-18 part), Johnson 8/4/84-l (AE-20 part), AQE-23, and Li AQE-32, (AQE-37 part), AQE-39, AQE-44, AQE-46, AQE-52 p f. Electrical Inspection AQE-7, AQE-43 Selan 8/3/84 ~ Reports; Inspection' Item Removal Notic'es, and In-Process Inspections D 6 m -a e P .59 B &W 5554-e g. ~ ~
- 4 T
O I e g
- ?
n. - 4 ~c A//tc - 7tix%cs2 >Prhew 'm ' (rie7)* sjar/'py ~ ,.1 ' Gurrsset,sc.Prxx ~2&rr-r / M a o.2. s L eerx/en ,4eecc-a rion.c s & N s a x is c D.rrm.se.eesee P: F%ur carcc-av 3: 6ecanosav Csrasatt ~~.s-i k r.u rios Ata.c l Ce resaa y A/a.e oe.o / 2. 3 .s-t 4 to /3 /.s- /6 }f'g mir_/a/cs. c ~ dt D - A/rw wa-w i 1 3 4 l.s-a r .e 9 g g g._, - p .rs u s-Ad f-2. P -~ ~ snms JGs-3 S p. CAmf Adf- +- S P S sg,,, e.-,yy g p sgu e-A
- g p
g g sos,,e-d er-7 s-P gg,,, g-A & f-f p Tenussexxen ro s # rre f A 0f-f .&g/gc l s o m s-A&f-/0 -P 3,,,. p gg _i/ p_ ssr>rc-Add"- /2 P S S Jemt dr-/.? P i $8/>ff k( lf = e.. 1 $4/>rc~ Af*-/[ f CAmr Af-/6 P f l same A C-/7 P femg Af-// 'p i same' Af -/9 9 i ~ .5/r?rrt" 88-2O P c i i .. r. s ~ :rcr..w. s er>1 6-Agg.2/ t l7,:.- nacr.n ~ : I C#mf Af 2 7. ' P. 3 I h l l l l ) -l l l 1
~ o. ,s c. h0C ' ~ / ECHA// CAL .Sc~st/d%/ le stm (Y[/) ' fl17l?$- .a ~~ [dM&C/M fd*qK, ~2/as s W / AA/.O 2 $ 6 e 7'/tsCM c ks e. GC-H 7'/o*>.t ' / (Mrd'GoM/f.f. fstass/cc~r~c~s?c~4ec- - P: F<t,ma ey. carec-,ey $ : G c ca.sD A RY CA rca-arti cs l Au'r.:a rsoa Afa.c l Cs re d asc y A/os l stD / 2 .3 .S l ; & fo /3 - 1/C /6 f e~m M/2/CS
- GL D
' /r></ A/d*W /\\ 2 3 4-l 4 G'1 7 S-9 ~ I f f l Kirms A af-23 Pt e sirm e. - A E - 2 4- _S. P. ~ age-13 A&.f-25 p.. //e-J o Ar-14 p' fff-3 / jf - 2 7-p $~ sfr-32 AF-2.9 P Ar-33 AF-29 ? s A E '- 3 SL 4F-30 P 4r-3 J~ //f-2/ P Adf-3 o AGS-32 P h/Cf-1/ A&f-3 3 ( ? A5E-32. A G E.? 4-P' Ad6-33 AfGE-3.S' P t far-34 AGE ~36 {g? S i 4GF-3,f" AOc -3 7 s ? 3 40c~-3 C Adr-3 ? p fQF-37 nec-J? S p l for-p Acc-to p i 1&E-11 Aae- +/- l P 1 'De-fa Mar- ? 2 P '&f-?/, A&r-45 p 5 P l.
- Ge -?.T AC F-f4-I i
I
o s -Q* s ,..,.s 2,.. ..s. hSh '- TEcRA// CAL ~ ' kd*V/EW $~n m ' 7~S () . ll 7lhh-' commcisc,Pm x, w 7: / s a.o.z. , b c=c7/C/cetL kg e.GC-H r/oa.f f (n/*CCbM/d"~.t* fAoffn c.~ne~2e~d cc~ ? : Vt's or.< A sey CArsc-e ay '~ ~~ .5 l G c c ass oA st Y CA rt&ctti c.$ Afst 4*an rica Afo.c l car s-Gag y A/o s !DLD / '2- .3 S* l 6 /0 /3 /C /6 $c"MM /2/cs $l. D Alf&</ NCW / 2 3 4-l.:5~ 6 7 P\\ '9 ^ Ade -43 AGE-4C p 466 Asf-+C p ~ A& c- N Adf-f 7 _p AGE-/6 A&f WP y JGF-$7 A&f-49 R !lsirm r af.t~o s y_ gmy AE-r/. p \\ firm e~ Adf*D-X P h1stme~ Af-[i P ~ i dar-r4-P sma r Smr A H- /4 P l l sne Ster-to P l 1
.'l.,. ;. " '. A[ +:frzof- -M-A=tTtnt
- $ N*]
6/c/64-t. CP AttEGATIONS CllART "* I* J"IY II* IIOI No. of Line items A4 .j QA/QC (GENERAL) 64 'e.4 ileldin 1 . AQW qu7qd AW ll Construction Concrete /Reber AQC qA7qC i - AC ll Constructlen jr;jin AQO A0 lf Constructlen Electrical / AQE ggfgg ,g gm Constrycts.n y,.g Pipe'& Pfpe Supports (Non V/0) AQP QA/QC 'AP Constructlen gj MSi li78F Constructles yy AQA. s-C structi.e I O gr
O t fM iN 1 i .h 3= "3 l \\ e; e. .m.. e o .e. m w m = o-l 4 \\ 1 \\ 6 eh b e l b 3 es we C E e
=
= ee s e o e U e
==. 4 C 3 = a e e en e s ee -
== e R 4. TC es d h g e e e D N = a= = C b b e S e S =
== u
== es e e* e e e en C
== e e e y e sus E O >= se >= N O e +. P e M N 4-4 4 4 4 4 b 4 s l l ~ e g. e-i g 4 , q W cW e* 6 e 9 l e I_, = + = 4 4 a h
e t.
- r,;
flClf*pt. j -, s-Rev. 1: uly 27, 1984 CP ALLEGATIONS CHART, ADDENDUM 1 -.e No. of No. of jNo. of Line Items Line Itees Line Items Orlainal Addendum I g AQ
- Q4/QC(GENERAL)
.g Weld jtn 84 25 109 4 .AQV .- QX7QC AW-Construction 31 / 32 35 1 35 , Concrete /Rebar-AQC QA/QC AC Construction 15 0 15 28 1 29 Coatin
- j.
AQ0 4K7Q J.1 , A0 Construction '3' 1 1 32 ,, t, 11 0 11 Electrical AQE. QA/QC } AE f . Construction g/d 2 13 5 5 10 Pipe & Pipe Supports (Noe WD) AQP. QA/QC .j- .AP Construction 3 1 4 14 5 19 Q$7W, AQlt 4 Mt Construction 2-2 4 11 1 12 g. .(8olts ' . AQ8 UQC. ' A8 3 0 3 Construc)I 8 '1 9
- 9 A
T e 9 + b.. h b S
+ e 1I g IN u \\w E: a\\eN % h e
- J "A
sg M % \\ D e M St 9h W P= PD m f*t N M M te y %s \\. o o o N \\ GS .\\ \\ O M m M N M M N M pe O* \\ \\ \\ = e \\ I 1 \\ \\\\ \\ .\\\\ \\ e \\, e u S= p w \\ O h g G. s\\ me we C e 9 s 9 6m \\
== E 9 's e O SO e e e =* t. S 4 C. 3
==G. O+ O us= 9 .W 4 ed C b C-ee C h 9 M W-9 4 9 4.3 0 - D
== "CO t.
- ==
a= C n-e. e + S e. O O e=
== U
== D .e8 .e 'e ed C u.t. e e C ut me g g g g ,*= E Q P= =* P* I I i l 4 x ,o. M 4 4 4 4 4 4 O Y I e ,e e ,._.e .= - e : =o, "T~* "'****Y* 5* = = * - = - P e e s e
- I J
q-e. s 4 6 + w-v, + .r ~e, ,~w-
$ h& f E Rev. 1: July 21, g984 l .I i i. . ELECTRICAL AQE - 13 M-]3 O 2
- I' Rey to Completion Categorft
/ 1-PriorLo)[ g - Fuel e(ding 'l 3 - Intet 1 Criticality / 4 - tere Fewer Testing 1 j 5 - Low Power Testing 5 - Power Ascenslen Testing 7 - Teil Power-a e e e m e 9 I 4 g e O e O l. l
b &/27/$9-i CONTR0ttiC COPY ^ COMANCHE PEAK NUCl[AR POWER PLANT AtttCAT10N5 AND/05 INVE5TTEATIDW5IDtARY S [ ***7 CROSS REF./0R TASK ~ COMPLEilDN $0URCE AlltGER-CATE RECEIVt0 AllEGAll0N OR CONCERN ACTION /$iATUS ANON CONFIO TRACKING CATEGORY 1-7 SCHEDULE SOURCE _""'a"L SY5itN NO, LEA 0 CPEN COMPLETE DottmENT PAGE AQE-1 Instrutted not to write 1 MCR Control Room of Unit X f* 1 1 ' electrical cables were ARI 4-83 013 11/3/83 A-38 being removed w/o proper (QC Inspector) documentation P. 8. Par. 1 OQE2 Cable was being removed w/o documentation from the
- X 1
Safeguards Oullding. Was III 4 83-013 11/3/83 A-3tl (QC Insp. ) P. 8, not sure NCR was placed in the system Par. 2 2,. . 45-3 Asked to disposition en Ifas not compiled X NCR where flex conduit as of date of 1 TRT 4 83 013 11/3/8 A-38 irr the Fuel Building was Report. replaced but not repaired (QC Insp.) P. 8 Par. 3 as described by an NCR 4 2, [}E-4 ' forced to close out NCR later " kicked not quallfled to close back" and corrected ('g 7/ 1 out - 7 TRT 4 83-013; 11/J/83 A 38 -(QC Insp.) P. 8. Par. 4 + QE-5 Unit 1 Craft needed an NCRIdehtification 0$ ' NCR closed to proceed I's were never 1 w/ pulling cable, obtained P. 9 TRT 4-83 013; 11/3/83 A-30 Problems with the U-2 at 15 re-(QC Insp.) P.8-5 Par.5 cable tray had not futed statements. been corrected. (Trash In cable tray; cuts in part of the cable cable was Interwoven)., Super-visor got another - Inspector to close out. N ) g O S-G
s. r p. M<1w ~ xj/2 7// 4--
- /r+.
i ~ CONTR0llED COPY Electrical P. 2 k C0HANCHE PEAR NUCtIAR POWER PLANT AttECATT5R5 AND/OR INVESTICATI63 C 51 h RY IA5K ( g m CROS$ REF /OR COMPLETION SOURCE j 1 ALLEGATION OR CONCERN ACTION /$iATUS ANON CONFID 8MtBETT SYSTEM N0 LEAD OPIN COMPLETE DOCUMENT PAGE ALLEGER-DATE RECEIVED .ro TRACKING CATEGORY 1-7 SCHE 0Utt SOURCE ? 4 lQE E Electrical Inspectors Inftlel dis-g S directed not to follow position IR,81-04 1 A$tB Pre-filed 1 l' 7 Lestloony (Taylor) TRT Unknown 3/82 Testimony. procedures dtd 5/24/82. P. 80 IqE-7 7 [# E' Electrical inspectors initial dis-A.51. IR 81 04 g had not performed posillen IR 81-04 I lit 4104 required Inspections IRT ' E-8 Electrical Inspectors Initl'a l ' dis-d# I i q .,i ' not quellfled position IR 81-04 1 IR 81 04 TRT I Electrical' drawings Initial' dis- 'qE-9 utillied for Inspections position IR 81 04 EJ A 1 IR 81-04 T/CAufFC/EIL'O W were incomplete (Review transferred 1RT to QA/QC Group) M/AC e "QL-10 tack of Training for .f R',fo 19Mf).fl. R D electrical personnel / RIV-83-A-0066 1 44-83 0!! 8/29/83 TRT A-39. P.lg Statement. P. 2. Q4-83-023 1/20/83 A-40. P 1 )E-11 Electrical QC management Initial dis-4 't '. were sympathetic to positlen IR 81-04 1 Unknown 1/23/81 production on management I C IR 81 04 5/5/81 P.3 TRI 2 f4 ')E 12 Electrical-taralnations Initial dis-I i were being ende and position IR 81-04 1 Unknown 1/23/81 " bought eff" by some 1RT electrical QC personnel. lt 81-04 P. 3
- 6 In nonconformance with drawings.
1 f O e 1
1 ~ p/+lt4 J pe/f4, //t7ff 4-i e, .s CONTR0tlEO COPY COMANCllE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT AttECATTON5 ANU/Oll THVE5TTCATIO m tARY e } TA5K (*n n e y CROSS REF./OR COMPLETION AttEGER-CATE lie (Elvtu SOURCE > = - TRACulNG cal [ GORY 1-7 SCllIDUI E 50ul:CE AtlECATION OR CONCERN ACTION /5TATUS ANON CONFIO ,8H/DATE SYSTEM NO, LEAD OP(fl C0f tPt EIE UucuM[tif TIE 11 AE-13 Improperly Installed Initial dis-RIV-82 A-55 2 Electrical Components position IR 82-29 g Cast letter to 4 82 012 Tai 82-29 & 50 446/82-15 Report of AE-51 RIV 0/4/c2 IN 84 29; A510 f....InJ j II.elted ag.pc.i.n(e of 9/13/82 by (f.andstr 1 at P. 4871 {AE-14. 5afeguards building {g g 3 6 f t,,, ~2, I cable tray hangers q4-03-023 9/20/83 (elev. 810) not TRT A-40 P. 1 Electrician constructed properly AE-15 separation criteria 3 . violated. l 84-006 3/7/04 A-7 TRT Testimony, P. 57 'Ai-16 Safeguards I panel on the Initial dis-I 1 IR 80-16 790's level has loose bus position bars,and ground wire IR 80-16 IRT P.3,5.M ,a - con.nections I AE-17 Control room area de-Inlital' dis- [ 1 i ficiencies (fleid run position CASE Itr of 3/11/83 IRT conduit, drywall, and IE 83-24 .llghts) to IE and OEtD m Iu I f . AE-18 Cattles are beln " butt-Open X I spilced" In vio allom of i ./ procedures TRT f.,,.u M m C, ,, y i ~ 'AE-19 Ov'erloaded cable trays Open X 7 j 4 e + 1 I e
l ? ~ ~ K ( .s i '[-- 5p . 1
- / z.7/R </-
CONTR0LtED COPY C0HANCil PEAK HUCLIAR POWER PtANT AlltCATIUN CIRW5TICATI5R5 5UtlHAny dort &fi'y CROSS REF./OR COMPLETION . TAst SOURCE Nd* TRACKING CAffGORY 1 7 $CllEDULE 100RCE AlltGER CAIE RECElvED AltEGATION 04 CONCERN ACTION /$fATUS ANON CONFID -SN/9 ATE. $Y51tM HO. LEAD OPEN COMPl(TE 00CUH[HT PAGE AE 20. Violation of cable tray open I d i 1 separation requirements 3 (( IRT
- 7 I* E' N
(inconsistent procedures A-47 Affidavit P. 10-11 su ca regarding cable tray 7/16/84 separation) A v n i g Am AQE-21 Duel numerical dest nation O I 4 systeminelectrica$/mechanpen O 1 ' 11 . 4.- Ical area has resaalted in TRT T/tet4 M M M i. massive confusion regarding as-built. (Systee. numbers p,y p ' assigned for both components P4ccit ab s and not~ accurately reflected 4 st ota e in each systees package) l 2 AE-22 U :r'3:r!::d ";.,;. Open.CA6 t#
- 8 4re-I W
1 pu! ;" ' :-J;;l;ett Ptecirf ghn f f T M-16 c a '- " e :: :, ,,.,,t 8o d J n s n,er m v* TRT g g g,,, p _ y gg(, '( 9 -at Enos). stWft ft$ thatrsed ,v. 773f a:R. O d's D e carA4 t'uFW l* A(i-23 Entensive revisions in the W D#1*df'# M I [ 1 b r*/** Fif'4 electrical post-construction
- 25 verification inspections Tai 18' F 3
\\ V ^#d 'C# 088 ~ 'AE-24 A cable tray held by a tes-i I 1' parary hanger fell several GAP witness anonymous #33. . levels and ripped out instru-TRT mentation wires-going to the control room i e e l
t 's I l s I W l b l l r 1 t i Se e e e i I e e6 . g. A M. Q t .O. I 4 .e..
- 9 m
k >= f E as 5 E.5 U G - SS Q eg 6E ew as I 3r =>= .m. 3.3 eo e oss pg % yp
- C aC "EM
.m.o. .0 0 O e eo
- n..o a
- =J e
e Ed 6> 1 =4
== o.m a e t= .e y l 4 e" q
- O 8.
3 e p g, I DU MM 44 DU e , i ( s = j / I l-a t y;- -e i ( -.--.-~,#-. I -l e .h" ~ ' m.._..r-- ww-.
l s.%. N 9 L\\ ~! 1 w c I: _t s I GB n sue >a ,= >u u F s. 3 + . m - = w o o => o u.. u u e, a a ~ ~ a 5
- =
= g3 et
- s. *
= m. o a = a. = < m n 3 - = u 6 U 9 E . a i n. .aa.n .t u > e 0 e a. ans 4 t a = J w aC 43 e. U t ene 4. e N e h 1 a f f 9 l e I* e e Oe
- p S
I .e 9.* 4 !5' 'b r + , + p - :,...{ i
- ',t e
..g'., 4 s
t 1 e-CONTR0ttED COPY J11y 21, 1984 / C0HANC11E PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 4fC& i TECilNICAL755DE5 5DFilARTTR005NFREFDRT DF 7/13/84 N/ / / Z 7/[b - i TA5K. CR055 REF./DR COMPttil0N SOURCE RESP. TRACKING CAIEGORY 1-1 5til(DutE SOURCE CONCIRN ACTION /STAIUS ANON CONFID CROUP SYSTlH HO. LEAD OPEN COMPLETE DOCUMENT PAGE ] '5RT 8 Olscrepancies in Instal-Open Mech / Piping 1 SRT Report P. 45 lation and documentation i ..t concerning RHR Heat 1R1 Exchangers . 5RI-S Potential discrepancy con-Open cerninguseofjaanutson Mech /Flping-1 5RT Report P. 48-49 certain anchor bolts for IRI Whlp Restraints gm 3 pc. r-t '5RT 10 Evaluate effect of weight Open [ 1 Elect 1 SRI Report P. 56 i of thermot g on cable trays g . IRI .s ' u. l-a l (_ . ~., .e s l I 1 r- + + 9 e 2 8 l s ( \\ i i
( July 27 1984 CP ALLEGATIONS CilART, ADOLNDUM 2 0 .j o, p[ i No of No, of No, of No. of Line Itees Line items Line Items Line Itees g[/ u[fh j Orlatnal Addendus 1 Addendue 2 Total AQ QA/QC(GENERAL) 84 25' 16 125 .Weldin AW QA7Q 31 1 3 3 . AW Construction 35 3 g l Concrete /Rebar 4 AQC .QA/qc-15 0 1 16 l . AC ' Construction 28 1 0 23 1 Cost ain s j AQO QA7Qc 31 1 0 /( f ' A0 l .} Construction 11. 0 0 } Electrical / i AGE QA70G I pst* / s A ' ,/ ,W J o pg M
- 3 7.-
AE j Construction 5 5 .e pg 9 yg f{ j Pipe & Pipe Supports (Non W/0) / 4dlT p
- gj
/ AQP QA/Qc. 3 l' 0 4 i AP. Construction 14 ,/ 5 5 24 Ita s [ N QA7 2 2 2 6 All j fj, Construction 11 g 3 15 j Bolts /.3'/ I '.i! 808 QA7QC 8 0 3 A8 Constructlen. 3 1 1 10 ' -b / / I s' . ' ~ ,s 4 / l' e y _ p o p i 1 P 1' t.
- 1
- e 9
L 9%. N A 1 -= o-r- to 8'D N es L o~ ac h R I b ~ = = o ~ v. A D 2 2 = g ~ I I t. = = - i g i. m. s e 2 I 4 I 5 m. J r t 3 g = 6 e =- s 6 -=, g - g - s .~ = o _Q So D ee C y s g c x - a, 4 O O 4 ) = e a p .k 4 4 4 4 s e* j<,- .-s.. , p,, y,,, _. "; e s. e . ",, 4 T'r ~ * ' ~ ' e -
- wU-re=-- - * = -+<--,re-~------ee,+++--
.m,.y._m.-%. % Q.,,,._..'_,. .,,,.,,,,,,.[,,
O o9 3-g;. + ED Ert e 94b N .h O I 4 g i t i i l O i 4 e I k p D.
==J e es em g O 4# e e L t...~ _".s 5., 2, : ax~ a m ~ n. .e o C E e 6 as o D'" W
=
a== il W
- te#
a-6 g b Sm 3 a== l ans nad - g 4 I e"n'# 4 te, i e o g .es e t.a= g L p l U e C O e - ~ m 1 e g a, i e 4 4 i a O f t t k k 9 4 4 4 J i 1 i i O s O e g 4 O O 6 ,e e e e e e e 9 g 3 g e n==. 9 = = - .g ' ' .., -..a a e a .e d e 9 f (,, 9 e ( e f 9 d s p f-e 6 'e q e C-
j v-h4fW Electrical, P. I g[2 7[.p/- i. CONIR0ttED COPr CDMANCllE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT !. 3 AttEcmourm7armtmemannumARr l C o mW CR055'REF./OR COMPtETION AttEGER-DATE REC [lVED TA5K' ' ALLEGATION OR CONCERN Atil0N/ STATUS ' ANON CONFID E SYSTEM NO. LEAD OPEN COMPtETE 00CUMENT PAGE ..f NO. SOURCE N' TRACKlHG CATEGORY 1-T SCllEDUtE SOURCE 9 AQE-25 Electrical QA Supervisors Initial dispost-( 1 IR 8104 only authorized to obteln tion IR 81 04 NCA member for draft. 1RT P. 16-18 Also, this policy i contradicated TUGC0 l (CP5ES) site procedure. k AE Wires of two different / i j, gages were terminated at 1 Comanche Peak Review some lugs and many IRI (CPR) of Installation. <j terminations are loose. g [ report during 4/3-13/84.. p Appendia A Inspector A 3 i AE-27. Loose L8 f.Ittings at east 'I. l, and south ends of 09It 1 CPR of installation 'dlesel generators.,Wote IRI report during 4/3-13/84 two NCRs. it.was accepted. Appendla A Inspector A 3. as is. , a..> <. c s.; - rr.> p .AE-28 Cables not c d = -? In yyy 1 CPR er Installation .j, workmanlike manner in TRI
- 4) nit I cable spread roce report during 4/3-13/84 end junction bones 1058 -
Appendix A Inspector A-3 } and 1959. NRC said OK . because cable radius was s-I ~h '0K bel lt did not admit E
- workmanship probles.
p [ [ AE-29 Added'hlgher side' to some s cable trays to keep cables 1 CPR of Installation 1 In trays (Note for TRT: Con-TRT report during 4/J 13/84 i sider the cable tray fill Ap,pendia A Inspector A 6 aspects of this allegation. i . Address this under electrical Category 13.} + d e 9 i*
_ = _ _ - - - ~ ,'1...- fic/69-CONIR0llt0 COPY COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANI AllECATl5NOllVETTIT.ATIUCUFhARY $g T AS K'- CROS$ REF./OR COMPLEil0N ALL(c(R-DAi[ R[C[lV[0 AlltCATION OR CONCERN ACTION /$TATUS ANON C PFID -8H/OAIE _$Y ll0 OP(M ETE DOC PACE AE-3i Density / Compaction Problems Y. l .y 1 CPR of Installation f IRI report during 4/3 13/84 g Appendix nspector A 5, A(-31 Problems with clearance of'ptpe and cables. Have g I CPR of installation to notch Insulation, place' IRI report during 4/3-13/04 ..".(-, metal between insulation and -troys. ApPendixA)InspectorA6 . AQE 32 Ql-QP (Quality Instruc-V tiens - quality Procedure) I CPR of installation 1: IRI 1114-12,{electricalrounting report during 4/3-13/84 backfit, raft complained so Appendix A, laspector A-1 Procedure was. revised to - reduce number of Inspections, 4 revisions made.to delete AQE-33 Concern with use-as-Is NCR ' (( requirements. j. ' situations, particularly I CPR of Installation - when using Es-100. IEI report during 4/3-13/84, ,1, Appendix A, Inspector A-2. d. I . E. .\\
+ i i h q% t r w sN ..4- . e-4. e 1 %, )' h, .O, %b' N l. en -en % 5. m O-4 m , C eg O .r. eie.O m g a. C e=e =* s C a l.
- k
== O e W O e U f e u ned
== 8"D de e*h ep a.== % ck en u .* N s . M I =* P't en .m %.x med e er== 4 er en su nas em C 4 er en a= C G. 80 - Ot== == C = t>== t>== I w < C .. eC C - e.m , + .C. 1 ~, e.
- =
et n en n en b aC e t aC Q u== c3 C 3 C 3 s e I W
- ME
- D W
== D W es= 'O tt N = m D a.s
==.
== == e 4. l' and O E h *e D
- =**D h ee 'CO a.
t> aC O vt D e
- h. C 1.
W O 6. C a=# u O er OW OO $ 11 er and D E. Ch Ch M Eb db & CL Ch. 9
- =
J Q 5 N sh e Ch hih8 eC u 4. tac A e.t A. et Cl N I u6 MM4E \\ w s 5 w 4 y- >=, } \\ an ana -e ed 83. OE o DQ 'i WU L. G ,r V9 X u, l. s '4 i o s l \\ 1 r ~. s I o I.I
= as t
46J D= D* b 8= -me M O E E M h O aC M >= M o= CL w M p. o a.3.s a s v e= \\ 4 h u \\ t >m M O N. t.3 l ei. E an. 2 O. eC.s and== Z as ad b uE i l CE eA aC ene KC - as w q I >= Q ueC 4m8 to S.
- a. R.3 O
W im 7 O tes e.ma w os o W e Ww ~. \\ E[ o m 3d Z aC ch st o I U + l W on= i
- =
N l 53 D , s N U o< .a = l-u s,3 UO med Eu e 3 mJ O aC, un E9 4 s l .n l = ,et A en X .O "y eCi O e 42 e e e 93 ,"O.- e 4 Wm 0 C3 >E a'W9 E a= e9 &
- D E $;
eb ogW e4 C *
- U e 3 3 aft & *= "O
.h8 g=
O *D h4.O D> .g3 em 9 9 O e
- 8..er D 4 CEO e
t= Ceb nas e e e b 6. E O e th'== 0 4 4 as W te h=== e 4 0 g en es e b 4e sc e 9 'O 2 =* 6. S w D.
- w.es O a.s (p-e e gT 3
6me3 a - e O a= 4 e tea 4 4.t a. M a'= h C D E > e.ma n. na 3W E.as =W=
- t. "O t.
et O C er e b *D em ), uZ e 3.O b am CA3e3 O me & D e "D er ea e C er u C 4 O U s= 9
- **===
e e w C== **.g sh
=='Oe =e a mee =* e 4 b u > 4 *= dk
== u M & en u u tis'D O 4. ** . R e *D 3==== 9 es et b en e m and "O e= D O =8 e, R.e-c= e kn M C 4 aC D3
== 4 3 C e W 8= A e== 3 O g od en Q
en O b C e g g'= 8. 9 ER
OO 9 a en e
- DC -
=* O
- ==
gp q en es..&. Oe er e ag e-E e en &== = e >== e. e ChC O D. W b== k O A e K4 U. & C =A o ep== et N C. S e et O em 6 e 9Me L. & W O& S S =3== == l.
== b@ = U C a== = IE em O 39 S es G h. b &.e. 2 + u h.=.== O as G W & es e ep O at p=
- O O
kw C 3 6 er en O er i. a m o O. E e. W e.n.C==W.e.e v.F 6 e.o 2 3 - 3
== -w o x e. a e e.ns
== C3> =8 a u 6.== u erem 4. O== e A
== u C en e C en .E3 =* O as C E en O== 0 et e 4 e me an Ed, 3 4 %# *= @ 3 4== u O A =* & C9. O. O. =O z ap 3 o e s 3 C====, 4 O O== ec. 6 6 b et O -.a e =seema C wo A armera :n s u,. =.== en A w e .? ? m .s. et O (7 e Cf >= Z aC es
- e e
\\ N- >r g 8 g e e ke 6 s 6 e p4 } e,, g 7 -- 6 .....=p. - -.-*~.' - o s. - ~ ~ = = = * / r. [sp W + 4 -n -ee,- V< v ' ' * ' ' ' ' ' * ~ ' " ^ ' "' *' M>?T'-
.r. ' ~ ' . g/f./ -,,7 - [ ; 27 ff-Electrical F. j .t;., CONIROLLED COPY t COMANCIIE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLAMI j AtLECATTDRNCTHVt3TICATIUii3~51RNARY CMW CROSS REF./OR COMPLEil0N ALLEGER 0C I R*CElvtB TASK SOURCE ' la ' - 1 RACKING CATEGORY 1-1 SCllEDULE SOURCE 'j g AtttCATION OR CONCERN Atil0N/5fATUS ANON CONFID BN/DAIE SY51[N NO. LEAD OPEN COMPLETE DOCljHENT PACE 'AQE-37 Pa'perwork confilet regard- .f S ^ 1 CPR of installation l Ing rework of terminate blocks. Six page RFIC and g lI F" 1RT report during 4/3 I3/84 1 procedure SAP-6 involved. f-Appendix A, l.asptclur A-2 J Wrote two NCRs. h49 ' :,: - .to,. r-- ' -g.home, awa:1 ".d - selved-feed-i i ' Aseks ff ( .t, AQE-38 Repaired solenold without i paperwork. No inform'ation 1 CPR of installation TRI Q.. regarding salsty classift-report during 4/3-13/84-i ' tation of solenold. Good Appendix A, Insptetor A-2 job was done in repairing solenold. .P .AQE-39. Procedures were changed to 1 CPR of.lnstallatlen' ~ match inspection (e.g.,- l? , loose teralnations found. IRT report during 4/J-13/84 In lightleg). Appendia A, Inspector A-3 i 'AQE.40.NCRs are answered sleply-1 CPR of installation that the probles is not IRT addressed in E5-100 report during 4/3 13/84 if Appendix A, Inspector A-3 AQE-41 NCR written because restraint cable p 1 CPR of installation - crisp gages were(worn andlighting) , 1RT report during 4/3 13/84 j. ' thus inspection was inade- - quate. Still being ~ Appendix A Inspector A-3 evaluated. 1 l j i t \\
.g. ,-hlf' f*-f Electrical, P p z r u ~,
- CONTR0tt(D COPY
- e COHANCitE PEAR HUttfAR POWER PLANT AtttCATIDR5 ARU7DIFINVE5TitATIONY 30RtARY
.e .T. D 'CROS5 RIF./OR COMPLEll0H ALLEGER-DAIE RECEIVED 1A5K SOURCE A IRACKING CATEGORY 1-7 5CitEDULE 5OURCE AttlGAfl0N OR CONCERN ACTION / STATUS ANON CONFIO Sil W 1E SYSTEM NO. LtAD OPEN COMPLE1E DOCUHtHi PAGE 3 AQE*42 llave more pressure during , ],r turnover not to write NCR. ( IRI report during 4/3-13/84 1 CPR of Installation Appendia A, inspector A 3 't 'AQE-43 irs were written falsely l 1 CPR of Installation (without reinspection) to clear llRNs on cable trays; tRr report durin 4 Information originated free h Appendia A, fnsp/3-13/84 ' ector A-3 Individuals in PGC and doc- .umentvagit.(edC*f*FfM l 3 F s. w Aou / ) AQE-44 Unsomfortable with some ' 1 CPR of installation ~ -use-as-Is sltvations, e.g.. reble separation problee IRT report durin 4 found in fuel building AppendiaA,fnsp/313/84 e ector A 4 ~4 during waltdown. It did not sieet procedure but was .evalu&ted as use-as is. f 'Q'*. .AQE-45 NCR on 5 thread engagement {. and other NCR on the same I CPil of installation for cable damage. It }gi report durin 4/3 13/84 .. area.d to be looking for a Appendia A, nspector.A-4 y,. seeme F way to buy this area off. l NCRs were poorly handled. f I S l } 7 L i e [ -4 aI t ? +. P e I.',,
..u., -fpp .ff,/p Electrical, P.' G CON! ROLLED COPY g-COMAftcitE PEAK HUCLEAR POWER PLAlli ALttCATIGT5 AH07001HVE5TICAT10fl5 5W1HARY - 04 4 CROSS flEF./04 COMPLEll0N All(GlH W.lf alfilil0 -TA5L SOURCE 1RACKlHG CAlfGORY 1-7 SCHfuutt %Didt HO. Att[ Call 0N OR CONCERN. .Atil0N/51ATUS ANON CONFID -tMtDM E SY51[H NO. LEAD OPtH C0!!!'ll it 00t Ut;ts:f twk f' 5 AQL-45. Problems with post' check. 1 CPR e,f inst.sil,etion.. 'e:g., loose lighting termina-gI 1Ri repue t c.n in,j 4/J 13/84 tions and junction boxes 6 i .,'[cokIlghtingoutofpro-Appet.dla 1., inspector A,y cedure and made it store Ifficult to look at 7" "**^' /". 1 ,J(unctionboxes.Manage-ment. was made aware of these concerns. ( "AQE-47 Use-as-Is when pressure 1 CPR of installetlun - I 15 on (safety requirements IRT g report dasIng 4/3 13/84 i, ' as being met)? - Appendla A, inspector A-5 AQE-48 HCR evaluations are inaccu- '[ 1 CPR of insta11stlun rate or unclear, e.g.. TRI report during 4/J-13/84 statement that workmanship was not compromised when in Appendia A, inspector A 5 fact workmanship was poor. .but the item was techni-cally acceptable. AQE-49 tot of rework to get 3 1 CPR of installation.'. separation 1RT report during 4/3 13/84 7 [ Appendia A, inspector A 6 . Initial dispost-Not on ATS 1 9/16/82 limited AE-50 Alleged slicing of safety-related or "q' electrical. Lion IR 83-03 RIV-82-A-56 TRT bl appearance before' j,.
- cables, j
I [ 4 6-fl. 4.VD 6' 22. G 6,3 +.3 IAi rt t
- t.
3 83-83 l pg g to g a y a o g/ Interview. Coarsents of j t.s A r> o u r sc w n.,,,,,w ofMaa lat'"I'*- 1 G,w t.c roe.n-y T I P3I cm u ven sArn.: 4 o /u *rttf c.eurreet. GaJ f & D a/ so t T-te d.* r%* P / ~41-84-48 tit.ev Aif w.. O t."5.I f4/ EFT 7W r Z. l'S A l Cartkr1AT I or) s/t 0L*%Tt3*J* P AaE-52. G i nt/ mrnf Arts wr . Off MG /a1totrg1"&rO O ptaco perste' dLy & P/f,3 f$0 e l c.drynf)w . u. a y s o_L s w =. c-s ] / Ql+IG Jo11 t taewr Qvs'rtitvt s eO yjg yyj p 75ygso,e.r yg(, m m
g_.._,... L.,....,' t. [' }. w)2 7(( b. . vo. I CP ALLEGAil0N5 CllART, ADDENDUM 3 g l ifo. of No. of No of No of flo. of l-3 Line items line items Line items line Items Line items Original Addendum I Addendum 2 Addendum 3 Total At) .qA/QC (GENERAL) 84 25 16 7 '132 AQW 31 I 3 3 38 AW Construction 35 1 1 0 31 Concrete /Rebar AQC - QA70c 15 0 1 0 16 AC 'Constructfon 28 I O O 29 a Coatings AQ0 ' QA7F 62 0 0 0 62 ~ Electrical s AQE DA/QG JF IO 2 W !f 1 .@(* I .AE Construction 5 5 g "7 2e 19 r l Pipe & Pipe Supports (Non 13/0) / - AQP DA/QL .3* 1 0 0 4 ,gI AP Construction 14 5 5 0 24 4 Hangers AQ11 - QA70 r
- 2 2
2 0 6 . All .Construetion 11 1 3 0 15 i Bolts .{ AB twstruction 'O I AQD QAE 3 0 0 0 3 l* I 0 10 .i- .I i .i i. 4 i a ?. 9 pI,lnT2 mvv ~aw >umau m.or u r m - :. - c r,u__ _ 1- _. --_-m = m - - = -_.w.1, 72G i,M1MM.13 3 #tt fEIE tsi tiTAS*::T M a442 tw)- e -E. 's TW2X f;q_ 3 : - - L ' - -__ - s i 1-~' i & m Ln n. QR, __ A,, ._m ...._L2 L __,,...m __s e a ...# e g, l l
)
[ e ' I t er EC O. se e O h we 3
- 4Ft t
M 3 M On .Che
== em art EO W h trD ag rg N e a IN e O O O' O O O On O O O -O O en e R O a0 O O en O es w b C s ,a N ? k' v ll f" ema. N S.t M. M 8'T M Pen a em F4 N s=
== N E Ee en b es On b o. O 1 A sk hD WD C )' g e.E.h no gg - b ep. l N en I U en efb O O S.= e. f ( c D b ea e es W C b C C b Ob ep 89 e O LS O
- D
=
- D e-k C
= e k sh e, a E e et O EL =.- u e= m . e* o c =
== C . we "o .a
== es er e c O .e = E O .>= = =. >=, I I D .tN l \\ 9 l l e, 1 N I e W 4 4 4'* s a 9 e t, .s e 8 '=g. .*J 'e*
- s p.-
.' s '3 = e <e *, i ,,.y A'*d = - ' - * * -' '" ""-" -
l ,t. '. ~. ? ~. I August 20, 1904 + 3 5 d, .I 1 1' .I. i i 4 l i. ELECTRICA' i AQE - I. j AE -I2' 4 s Key to Completion Category: 1 I - Prfor to OL n. ,3 i 2 - Fuel Loading i 3' Initfal Criticality i .g. l m 4 - Zero Power Testing 5'- Low Power Testing 1 6 - Power Ascension Testing s , 4 7 - Full Power t i fa } I i J i 1 e-e t I i g 1 U 4 ,i. f*- .i +- f .4 f ' L '* ' _ _ - .[ i 2 g 1.m. ---.c _.....- - O Aa 9 e f e 7 9 g v.
f Nf' _ __
m_._
7 W um -c. -n m,. l . wdqq '~ f' .L ) ne,.r-a mm/27/f/ p-1, P o Electrical, P. I i C0flTROLLED COPY '3 CONANCllE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER FLAf4T At t E MTIDfirARD7DFINVE mMTIONr5tn wty c TA5K c 4 SOURCE ,,9 CROSS REF /04 ConPLETIDN ALLEGER-DATE f:ECElyED HO.: ALLEGATION OR CONCERN ' ACTION / STATUS ANON CONFID ,S4l.DATE SY57tM No. LEAD OPEN COMPttiE 00CUMEffi par,E TRACKING CATEGORY l-1 SCifEDULE SOURCE .d ' ACE-52 6.9 KV ectors a' re not Elec. Cat;15I P_ ' S beIng inspected by I Disinsitto's of 1 procedure QlQPil.3 40, g TRT 8 C-- Rev.15(02/13/84) 4 / /84 P. 55,012;55.016 2 AE-53.' Conduits ESB I-41 and Elec. Cat. 3 3' l C14K30915 were separated 1 .b TRT Perce %y prying ESB l-41 with e. of scrap conduit %7/17/84 EG2484-G070, v'~. ^v, i P. 55,032 55.033 m ru. on ns,,n,rw Exhibit 431 4(41 b vDuaf h7. t 6 0 C M3 h,',',',y,,, f: Ij A r3try T-
- 3 TIcrt s N
- T V s e p ofse v V y
i 8 i C Af$Lt,P TTEd[.7,3 9 ee p3 e couv - 4r,.,v-t i w, rs, p fe l' J Tiff eswT4 rt.,Bu t s.pn!(r 4 r, ev ir,. m,,,,.. " ' / u r// Wa rwer s I i b(L84"VF'I T*i+e sfaf 1'emsors4rs e / 8 Vrpt478e e ?., A'H-li. C4rser vet *vs smoo.rres arm 2-1 4 Ncrr f5enra./ / a.s t pts s erry ' stevnr-D 'rs t e. *.?tru 'r't> Es er rwr l 4 o s'r',ter s ' Aar+< y.r a s as su 4 c.< A 4 rv' 1 Avo Do avr n,4-ve' P st.*
- eM.
h4 A rirte,41. Yttecen4 is i a. # ry e i 5'er ef t - 713 5 bet.e v,vc (Act s.nasenrevs l - 4 o o c4as.s v r e r0o v ). 4 s.3-se nsee rsi Pas e. t. \\ ^ - r < w P t c - s c s ort s.a r a s s m.r e.r a c e s { eu El ~ ~l4 5 5. (,F s r -t 59 a.s rtr,r oyste,saks. \\
- t. o c Ar tnt. potasarus Ave sesses ou w =aF7tscett ent.oed sr mevis.
- 5 s %..n,. ero 3 Is, aru o,
C err A sc. e 3,ts,.as av,.3 rt rv s.t%# erra. , i l' tw..x e r.ww x -ww.. - ,, =.- m v e mm.- w x = - - m<-,an..--------------- -, ww**mt *!c,i;,mW3xir e.. f - a
- b_ _* -
L1 -.i i lu - - 4 m. __m e 1 mr en. m 1.._.r, w . l, _ m __ I
- __m, i
a I s l
h i 1 s 1 V I 5 \\sk . a' o is. = ( s = o i,N i 5-i = b i E 2 % D( EO 3 %, 4 a=5 t s Od5 b d 3 3 ~ g c o. A w A o. t m mt El$ E" M 5e E7 "a g S8 Buma ~ 5 I E $$5 s ws EE 8 " :, 84 5 e 'E lEt; ' y ,E s-f,WW s s d e gE 8. t J 4H M e Eg6 o: "h hd !s mg E t ) .q. b. e, v a iu k s.s 44 C
- sit, ui y- *d t
s g W j E E t t C m ~ T k { e,1 h v *k s I: O 6 t A e I ,t v3 ,QAgQ .g g g g D L 's. 6- ( i A,. (w g3 . g..,_ s s, g 4 LE L23%0 1 9* E t o is 0 ~ V W gO N tt 4 I'I':t 8 s o (At 34 2 hw 4 A - s y a s wt N O h IO ( t t t u o p s.o ?- e 1. 4. = . -4 R b b * *s kk 4 CE s ) 4, .+ ~ h s4 = K4tt$ss u -M. 0 l11ld q .; u .,..o.'.. - ;' .t . l.f... --,.. u. n : ..,.l3 8 9 g>.' s g
I [f[le!" h r. 5 'i CONTACTS LIST Group: beICl*/Etedt. Reference Document Allegation t Alleger No. Alleger Name (OI Rept/Insp Reut) Number Remarks + -J5- 0/3Qt/.3/j3) A G d~-/ A-32 \\ sar 1 /10 E -3 A GC. s/ 1 AGE-f V-A SL B f?ac-A -3/ 77 p g -G re.r riin.., f fl'L V/f L ) i
- ZR s / - 6 41-
'I ,_y KZi/-s3-st ~oots gg -;o Q 4 -f*J.'o 2.///./11/r 1) I y e c pS Gd. -J'3 - 0 2 3 A G G~ ~ / o, = C 4/za/s 3) er- /4-t f 'R/V-12-A- .s- ! ste-/3 e ~~ 4- - f.z - o i 1. t t. l A.t~t. /3 i s m 'o r r a i ~ ' p e ru st o e e G y j S!h 1 s 1 A J 9. -coC (3/7/f 4}}. A g - f.". r 4 w;,so a.rchic-a es.re crie r i i i $N? W $ h AG~ ~ // s i I G /I P y o r e 2 l pg _jg e g .,j;. ..... :. u.... - - -..... ' s mm A a
a y s/ r r-CONTACTSk.IST Group: [c c~4rd/citt_ Reference Document Allegation I Allener No. Alleger Name (OI Rept/Insp Rept) Number ' Remarks $///' W n pes.r J es-i4G~-/f
- 7 -
sms G v<e nia-u- - se-2o '# /3 7llC/jf (g-47) M f-MTMte+D vse lb ~ nc 6 // f
- Z ~Z. & Wz. D Pu e.se-Qpse
^ /d'-C'/
- Q)j' ~ "
Mar-r 9 ' t c M f.r e z e =- Re e -23 AnoaYaous &.11 l. gg.y I I i l 5 i i I RG'-ro. .I ~ i e e ~ e 8 e \\ r l I l f. = - - g a j l i 1 l i - l 1 ~ i I e i i e b e=* g a e a so.4 9 e 9 -,~.,,.---t ---.-S-e----,--e .1-m,.-,,.,,oe--..~..-e ,wc.-ew-,-.wm#m,wn-, wry.-w...-www-c w,-y.,.--c.--,,
r f [~l:/[ 8-k.,,,. r, C4HTACTS 1.15T s V i Group: L CCT2./ f ** L Ecfere.ce 'o:::ent Allegstica A12 u :.r 'io. &l_ _t.ger :*ane (OI ?.ept/Insp Fest)
- Se r_
' ?.anarks 1 .rie r sse r war
- " '~ &
A-N +/.1-1244 ~3 2- ~_ s/z7" .rizr,eemrrer ,9a e - 2.e -_._ ._ 4 .7. 4-/1-/2/t 4-s o. e -1s. p s a. z : n se -ss ,+ a. e - 7 i c so Gc .3 1, M _Jt_ei,ega.e a,a+ uprs 7e7 "y~
- s a 7-g**r.
+. e -z r O ....p -3 es e- +o + f, i_g]s.4 s a e-u s.4e 42._ __. of G f- &3 /c-2. s {se %7 j ze se-A.4 l .3.~1?/ f.f._._... { M e- +r-1 c *u~ [-h( ._ 4 - s' g warn./s 4 i m#* M 7 1.rZsyft4 \\ ._-i y . ce a s.~ r-. _.. p a g. s-z. 7 ~j,g F* ~ 7//7/# # 4e .r 3 ) gg,- p,.Q -lpqt gy-L-A-- ~ - -- n t ' ener
- se
.r. l in - g f/313(f4 ..., nae -9.') - s se-2i I I 1...._ 8 I i l t 1 l a. I 8 f l I t f I _l l t f ~ I i .j_......._.._.._ 4 ,W* a lk l
e f/s/sf-- O
- CONTACTS I.IST Grouo: [&GCr%/t~d L Ra.ference Document Allegation.
s Allerer No. A11eger Name (OI Rept/Inso Rect) Number ' Remarks u-ner n C + -JB ~ 0/3Qt/2/s3) A Gt$~-/ wnt-e r tj't9l, \\ A a d~ 2. l a. AO e -3 l A Gr4 }O AGE ~T \\ 'l e A.TLB fac.pe g p g -6 ,ru g,,,y \\ p_,, frT4/777 (J",.@,j I,Q i
- IR 3 /- o 5-71<,vg.3 p_g KIV ~f 3 = n ~COU
, ggg g -f c (,g,r m ahp O 4 -J'J- 0 2.//flt-1ll f) l%".1/ t f~ W en=t/t r A -p \\ G d ~d"3 -0 ~i3 AGr-/ 0 l w wot 6se t u l C 4/Loff 3) Ar- /4 c~mi r ifs 1ft C c I I. e f en[se) A~ [ l R/V -f.2 ~ A .f.s-t M E -/3 $~3 t's7.3 4- - fz - o r z-t ' ou sws ao l A.rt./3 oow srw i ~ ~ ' ' ' ' pornitdu ee-Gy, j ~ili4 2 i g7 6 4 -cec l3/'!lf h.I' A C - /C" 5 /~ L e '***=r-I b#$ l , C n.rst erre rozF skc~-/7 g $$6 R s' (CASE ) I i ?p,,0,fSD l oustkescEO i 6dF # G i l 'a*ano ser tw ce**cT /w/t e-i ge _ ff l I i ~ w. .c ~r i,.,o.m .f gr-/y lhe d'N 8 A. lwvt.ur s% s 1 ~ 9
e------
s-- - -e a
l /, e P CCNTACTS L s-Crcup: $le.~CrfE/Cstf C Reference Docu=ent Allegation I Alleger No. A11eger Name (OI Rept/Inso Rent) Number Rect ks u,to us trab /// %* rr pe s's estoco wmo< /YL~-/f I M'f'oA) ro He( ~9 - Aes:s oTver llto -it - ,y y 2 o '# /3 7l/C/]f. (d 47) A G f - Z./-;T M /C+3 vsd
- l$ ~
s'l f - Z Z - = ' r oc Per o sc~ yise sf'f .$~~/ ~ Of*Qy"~ " Ast-r F _~ r I &Af wirus-fg r a z t-ife f-2.3 vwn so r= i ^'//M/9~. GAP,oirue t AND " Y"au t &.T I f gg g d,. t l l -~ ww Mt3 w =s" e g -1 _.,.^ p p O I l Ra~.s o %unsee r-. / ,nstfz.1 rc ~ i e O l f 6 I l w-I o 1 .I .f g 1 I I t l 1 4 m___ e e ____._,,______________..________..________.i-_,--._,.--.---5
g0 - s/2r ! T. 'Co C/, CTS 115- ' ' \\,'l' cA '_ u. ~.' :. r c :~2. t e n- \\ r.'are.ce hec.ent' A11erstien 3 r. Al'ap.r 'h-b (OI Eept/I.ro Fest) ' ur.t e r Ee: arks e sie r sa r neomr 6 * 4 - A-/ w n s sa* - _ +/3 - !3/f& no courver. t* y,.7p c' ga,- sier Remrrer <9ae-12 . _4 -! 2 4 e 4. e -:r <. ssc77.} s:;.,3
- y. e._-2.. : _.a_rc rferD n a e-ss na.e-27
, % c'.3 1..... _._._ .s.e r ~ '~fier,epcin.,- Cf11~ ^ ^et. e-2 9~ '(L=. ~~ ~w) d "'** ^ 4/,,g);4 --.4. - 3
- Yi U
!^'WM*" M D s _,q<e-s2_. oa -
- c- + 3 C stressm se - z c.
n.e-32 Da s su uco sse -z.e s~ni- ,5-i f 72,,,,,, ~- 7s% er - p. 1 l _ d -2 2-nit 4 t* *~ ~ # g. -l ***/' Wt 9-Pman I a l m
- stwov-i se.rce er % w.
1 car
- *w W erva.
i SR7-ko__. _.. . t;*;Naad2;s,, Q. r
- ,tae -+c
, ~7 4-5~._. ) ,.D n,r_-/ s/,f 4 _ ]_.$*N /g %'4T/14-4./ \\ ra. a.~,, - sa e rs. _;gssig g - l l // T// Y' 'Af-f3 ,.Y,,
- .p e J ea sseo
.s.e r - Ser Re-pard;" ~ gn 79r-W-~-- ;issm +.f Ismar in-g f/y.i3 g4 . H ^n^ 4 m.e.,5.1 _ c~ r*e t- ) stlc [ ^t'F - )...._ - i h I ,I a I I I _~ t l t ? l i. I l U 1 l 8 l ~ . 1... _._. I i .2...- a . y._. I e 4 w.,<w,_ _ _ _,,___--w wew-?-w-e--w-m-ry m-cw w. _,ww:c --m--m-"ee-T'T-W-re,m
~ n r. h*1 !.O'E~. ~ ' l' o,. UNITED STATES. ,- k k S / ~ + '8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION .c-a p WASHINGTON, D. C 20555 %.....y IlFC 7 1984 ~ ' Docket Nos.: 50-445/446 DO NOT DISCLOSE l MEMORANDUM FOR: See Attached List FROM: Vincent S. Noonan, Project Director Comanche Peak Technical Review Team E
SUBJECT:
TRANSMITTAL OF ACTION.IT AS DEL TED IN TRANSCRIPT OF MEETTNG WITH N NOVEMBER 7, 1984 'On November 7,1984 members of the staff met with is a transcript of the meeting. Topics scusse y e.s. aff at the meeting were in the Civil ructura Mis us, Electrical and Test Programs areas. In addition, raised several concerns. delineates actions that the staf must take as a result of this l meeting. Also provided are the transcript page numbers that focus on the particular action item and responsible persons. Please followup on these action items and provide A. Vietti with your results no later than COB )t December 14, 1984. on. Project Director omanche'P ak-Te hnical Review Team O d m. L % z_ 7 J ga a k v.xhtu+ Sss W* h \\M w L,2.4BO %i2tf@Q j I 6 o* M % 4 g% - h2. a m e m +. M a '(fji?$ ? u )R;:,, G ,I h am .r; q e ry n Am.e#..vnm - ~ 4 D 392 w /ss 9 ,e m
~ l 2 i Addressee List .J. Zudans A. Vietti R. Philleo L. Shao J. Calvo R. Keimig' W. Smith D. Hunnicutt R. Bangart H. Livermore. R. LaGrange i D. Terao J. Gagliardo +e,.e., g S / i r
.$._\\ A---=-'-------:---- ~ DO NOT DISCLOSE Transcript Responsibility Action Items Pages 1. Review for information discussions 9,90,106 H. Livennore ,on QA/QC failures in areas of: Civil / Structural Miscellaneous Electrical 33-35 Test Programs 66 2. Look at the designed and installed 25,76-77 R. Bangart supports for HVAC, system ducts in containment. (Sp cifically, vertical and laterals) 3. Determine the temperature equipment 28 R. LaGrange inside containment is qualified to withstand. 4. Investigate CSB' pro ~cedure for reviewing 59-64 A. Viett_i/CSB containment integrated leak rate testing 5.. Investigate inspections and reports 78-79 A. Vietti/VIB issued by the VIB on CP vendor Bohnson Co. 6. NCR E-81-00088, dated 3/25/81 79 J. CaIvo (AE-55) (document provided) ) 7. Case Exhibit 658 (AE-56) 81 A. Vietti/J. Calvo ] (Locating through POR) 8. Check if when CP used 2500 psi concrete 87,91 L. Shao strength mix did the analysis reflect 2500 psi or 4000 psi
- 9.. Visit plant site to see what actions 11'4
.L. Shao- ~the applicant has in progress'on'* the control room ceiling Action /Information
- 10. Check if Gibbs & Hill used a 115-119 L. Shao/D. Terao 1.5 facto'r in all static load calculations (if not why didn't Cygna notice in their review.)
P j e as I l 3 I
A b - *?*.. i. ~ Do NOT ofSCLOS2 Transcript Responsibility Action Items Pages-Action /Information
- 11. Check if in containment allowable.
119-122 L. Shao/D. Terao stresses go beyond yield for cable ~ tray supports.. (TU used a generic design with allowable stresses for .the auxiliary building contrary to FSAR comitments.) (Cygna did not address) i Action /Infomation
- 12. Check if when TU attached their cable 124 L. Shao/D. Terao
- trays to the support and structural steel, they drilled a hole through the flange of the channel which reduces the section modules which has not been accounted for in calculations. Check some of the cable tray supports in the field.--(Cygna,did not address)
- 13. Liner Plai:e 127 L. Shao 4
- 14. NCR on a 10 CFR 50.55(e) that 138 L. Shao TU did not report. (Information transmitted from Gagliardo to L. Shao)
- 15. Crack in the basemat (AC-44) 148-166 L. Shao (documentation 0
l duringmeeting)provided
- 16. Specific problems with concrete.
167-169 L. Shao i '(documentationprovidedduring-meeting) 17.' Minimum wall. violation for piping 171 L. Shao (AP-29) (documentation provided at meeting)
- 18. ANI Reports 174 H. Livermore/
(documentation provided at meeting) L. Shao (if i needed) m l
- 19. Nckage fromi i
received L. Shao l '4/84 S q l.
~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ Qg gy,, l .L l' f6 S TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPA.'T u uinv.isv.. u....u.. r o.. m o, QGH-85 Septee.ber 3.1980 Mr. Nabil Keddis Manager. Quality Assurance Gibbs & Hill, Inc. 393 Seventh Aven::e New York. New York 10001 CDMANCHE PEAX STEAM ELECTRIC STATION E'/ALUATION OF AUDIT RESPCNSE GIB85 & HILL.'INC. 7 TGH-14 y QA AUDIT FILE: TGH-14
Dear Mr. Keddis:
Your responses dated July 18 and August i 25, 1980 to the open items identified during our audit TGH-14 have been. received and evalu by TUGC0 QA. Please consider all items to be closed. response is required at this time. No further 3 Thank'you for your cooperation. Very truly yours. TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATfNG JC r 5 .\\ Cha bNC/ lb:dk Manager. Quality Assurance cc: R. G. Tolson. J. T. Merritt H. R. Rock i i i. l I 6 !i L.. - - - - ~ ~ ~- ' ' ~ -
.ew*
- 3,-
~ 3 1l- [ ( Gibbs 8.HiH. lnc. i /
==.ineens ens..= ens ce=ar=uevens m.. a.... o..... ,I evee veo-5450 j GTN-48517 August 24, 1930 Mr. David N. Chapman 1 Manager, Odality Asisurance l. Texas Utilities Generating Company- ['>4,$*,,,e-{ 2001 Br V Dallas,yan Tower y Texas 75201 g g\\$. N go t i
Dear Mr. Chapman:
TgCO D' Dh f TEXA5 UTILITIES GENERATING CCP!PANY j CCMANCHE PEAR STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1981 2300 MW INSTALIATION i i G&B PROJECT NO. 2323 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT TGM-14 SDPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REF: QGR-81 DATED JUNE 24, 1980 I mation on TGH-12, Concern:No. 2, as evaluated r-i. ] Concern No. 2 stated: 4 ularly on drawings depicting electrical cable tray. , partic-- were noted where some DCA's were documented on the drawings Instances some were not. All DCA's (or DECD's ' should be treated in the same manner.)" issued against drawings i } TUCCO Auditors reported in TGB-14 the following i 1 'TCH-14, Evaluations
- A draft copy of the prcposed change Jas reviewed.
j reads as folicis.: The change i 'When design drawings are updated to incorporate Ct.H NY or change documents will be listed on the drawing. ' gn We acknowledge.that in Gibbs & Hill's response t i { (GTN-45502) o TGH-12 June.20,*1980.the target date for revising your procedure w'as j cf.the procedure."This item is being held open pending revision- ~ i aos sewaatn ave =ue =a vo==. .v.iceo, e..w:as...,,,u,y.,...; ,n., .-~es ,-g .p ps-,- .-m,.- -e>re' r ~---e-~ -,,,,--p .--- - -, - -,eeme- .wn e Y. a nr.* -~swe r -~,o--,--,---+-e--oe
~, f [ (, I Texas Utilities Generating August 23, 1980 Company ,l, ?sge 2 / G&B Response: i l -d.e proceaure for controll~1ng the listing of design change docu:nen .on drawings was completed and distributed ~to holders of the.Frojec Gi2id e. The procedure.is located in Section#IX-1 of the Guide. Th new procedure may be examined in. Project Guides assigned to D. Chapmani R. Holloway, or R. Beim. In response to your request for a status report on the issuance i of G&H proposed CMC program, we submit the following information: The procedure for processing CMC's was revised May 21, 1980. The procedure is contained in the Project Guide, starting on page V-29 The sirocedure covers a computerized listing of CMC's and includes-columns for approvals,. rejections, safety classification, and ,a n_ _....a -______ __-....._, An initial CMC' computer listing is being debugged and verified.- After this, the CMC data base will be airectly accessible by -site computer terminals. Very tr' uly yours, i GISBS'& HILL, Inc. NNTryd Nabil N. Kaddis Attachment Manager, Quality Assurance l cca ARMS (BER Site') OL 1A l j J. T. Merritt (TUSI Site) IL 1A-l t i i l l i 1 i i l S D . '. ~1
t s, r.. -( (
- Gibbs 8 Hill. Inc.
.................. co....uc,... BletCT O#4L Enf ema#cm ists veo. 54S0 GTN-47763 July le, 1980 i .....t l Mr. Dav!d N. Chapman .h ' ) Manager, Quality Assurance Texas Utilities Generating Co:npany
- 6... s-t I
2001 Bryan Tcwer \\.1 '. Dallas, Texas 75201 -a' ~0-Dear Mr. Chapmans TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1981-83-2300 MW INSTALLATION GsH PROJECT No. 2323 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT TGH REF: OGH-81 DATED JUNE 24, 1980 We wish to thank' you for your letter transmitting the results of TGE-14. Although there are no deficiencies or areas of with our response (Attachment A) concern, we would like to take this o j to the unresolved item. We greatly appreciate your cooperation and assistance in connection with the audit, satisfy your requirements. and we trust that our response will i Should there be an terms of response, content or interpretation, y questions in to contact us at once. please feel f ree i very truly ycurs, l i i GIBBS & HILL, Inc. g"f f ?b NNKarl } Attachment Nabi? N. Keddis CC: ARMS (B&R Site) OL 1A Ma nage r, Quality Assurance J. T. Merritt (TUSI Site) IL 1A l P e ses savewin Avenue aaw voan, w. v. teoot e ke: ei.e.ngt,,,,yo., 9 0 9 ww * ~ " ' * ~ " ' ~ ~ ', __,-_.---e- - + ' ' - ' ' " - *
- ry e
~ . ):. (. s P k + t + ,I I a 4 J ATTACHMENT A , j AUDIT NO. TOR-14 I l CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE' i 4 0 4 6 J 1 i i 1 6 I4 9 6 4 4 y e + 6 6 9 e h e a I g 4 6 4 p 6 0 e
- 6 4
J 8 e e 8 g g & 3 + = e- .e, 4., 4 O - 0. E. ----- - ----.. --- C --
- =,......... g ~ c. ( TGH-l'4 Unrasclved Item No. l i ) The Alison Control contract for Fire Detection Panels (ES-173 i was reviewed as a result of-questions raised during a recent TUGC0 release inspection. A discrepancy was identified with regard to the size of control wiring that Alison is allowed to use in their panels. paragraph 3.6.4.3a stated that nothing less than 14 awg could ES-17B, be usede larg'er than 18 awg. ' The specification was changed via N-661 to ' read "nothing less ' than 18 awg* could be used. comparing these documents to. what our, inspector was given,In and 14 awg. auditors noted that Alison stated their int'ent to use 22,18, The vendor was' subsequently contacted by G&H for clarification and indicated that size 22 awg control wire was being used in the panels for Comanche Peak. Corrective Actions . As stated in the audit report tih'a vendor did 'not ccmplatel'y which was discovered during a ' shop inspection. follow 'th 1 i The Vendor which was received by GEM on Julywas contacted and subsequ 10, 1980. Upon evaluation of this request, and has issued DE/CD N-661 Rev. I dated JulyG&H concluded 14, 1980 modifying the specification. O I j e r i. p p M 6
..,.. + ~ =" TEXAS LTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY Oekn liny s.4 Tleh 4'.D4 13.41.t gm TA* %we 74pt SH-81 June 24. 1980 i 1 Hr. Nabil Reddis Manager, Quality Assurar.ca .Gibbs & Hill. Inc.. ' 393 Seventh ' Avenue New York. New York.10001 ^ CCMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT TGH-14 GIBBS & HILL. INC. QA AUDIT FILE: TGH-14 ' Cear Mr. Keddis-Attached is TUGC0 QA Audit Report No.. TGH-14 describing the res I cur audit of.Gibbs &' Hill. Inc. perfomed on June i Debra Anderson (Team' Leader). Susan Spencer. Antonio Vega and Li 10-13, 1980 by Bielfeldt observer. of your cor(rective a)ctions to our audit T6H-12..The scope l Attach:nent A contains an evaluation of each deficiency and concern identified in TGH-12. No new deficiencies sre identified. ment B contains one unresolved item requiring action by Gibbs & Hill Attach-j Thank you for your cooperation during the audit. Should you have any questions, please contact Debra Anderson at i 214-653-4882. j t. Very truly yours, l TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. lbitA - i I Attachment Manager Cuality Assurance CNC/AV/DLA:dk i cc: R. G. Tolson t J. T. Merritt. \\. H. R. Rock I l i 1 ~
9 0 e t. . f, ~ k 4 e 0 e b e e ATTACHMENT A. i AUDIT NO. TGH-14 EVALUATION OF CEFICIENCIES l IDENTIFIED IN TGH-I2 I l \\ 6 P J i l t i a b 9 e 9 4 8 e ep 9 9 , 5 g g 4 0 9 9 gg g,
- n.,.
( f c . f e. - - 1 d Aucit flo..TGH-12 Deficiency flo. 3 ?nuire:1ent; Precedures DC-7 and DC-10 defirie the require ents for - preparation, approval, reviey, distributicn, and re-trieval of technical calculations. t 'l 4 Findir.g: . Contrary to the requirements as stated in tne acove j precedures, calculations supporting seismic acceleration values transmitted to the. vendor under P.O. CP-C047 via GTM-20154 cculd not,be produced. In addition, Frchlem No. 29 original calculationsJcould-not be prcduced by i the Applied Mechani. cal. Group. These calcula'tions' were d done prior to implementation of a full Ocalf ty Assurance i j 5 program. i ~ TGH-14 Evaluation: i We wish to acknowledge the substantial effort that has gene into j upgrading the calculation books in Applied Mechanics. Althcugh,.a large backlog existed and still does, a schedule has been ger.erated i l to correct the' problems and has been adhered to. Fifty-one of 179 calculaticn bccks have been accepted by QA. Work completed was re-viewed and no deficiencies were identified. It is evident that Applied Mechanics and QA have put a lot of effor.t in this area. Please censider this ite::t closed. Your continued progress will be reviewed during a ~ future audtt g 6 f h v i I IUCCo QA .6 s ~ .i f
s (. (.. i Audi~t No.,Ifdi-12 Deficiency 30.
- f.
4 bouirem.ent: Prcject Control Precedure PC-6, "Vendos Drawing Follcw-up' Procedure" states its of:jective is "to insure that vendor drawings... are expediticusly processed... [ and returned to the vendor as soen as possible, preferably within a three week period." .t Fir. ding: Contrary to the above, Gibos~ & Hill has not consistently-met its stated objective. For example, Meddco Metals' drawings submitted for approval were received oy Gibbs & a i Hill on July 13, 1979. As of December 13, 1979 these drawings had been.inhouse approximately 18 weeks overdue. These have not been statused and returneo to the vendor.. { Other ex'amples were also noted. - In addition, the follow-up procedure is inadequat.e in ~~ that the procedure fails to identify positive management action to be taken when vendor documents are not processed. within the time objective. 1 i k TGH-14 Evaluation: s. <s. The Weekly Overdue Reports for approximately the last acnth and a half were j reviewed along with project meeting mitiutes. There appears to be marked q. i improve 1ient in this area. The most overdue entry was.six (6) weeks,'and i documented follow-up was observed. ' Discussions with responsible: personnel fndicate that the new fomat is more effective. Hewever, G&H Project j Control Procedure PC-6, Rev. 2, dated March 1980,-requires.that a monthly l status report Le issued.. This report was not' issued-untti the Week of the V : audit. We feel that the month'ly report is a~n-important management tool-i , in that-it shows the total time in4iouse,: whereas 'the weekly repor,ts' only address the amount of time overdue in a particular discipline. Due 40 the cverall progress seen in this area,.please consider this item closed. ' ~ .t ~~ tu:co CA f t .~: l ~~~~ ** ~ ~ * ' ' ~ '
r. --_ 4 Audit No. TGH-12 Ccncern tio. 1-Aucitors are concerned with tne lack of procedural controls regardin'g the Procurement Support Group. The Project Guida and Procedures make I no mention of this group with regard to Vendor Interface activities. Auditors acknculedge tha fact that Quality Assurance has identified this as a problem and is working crith Project personnel in the prepa-ration of these crocedures and revisfons. However, thrcugh a revieu of } t the work presently being done by the Procurement Support Group. auditors' wculd e'xpect to see the folicwing. subjects addressed in these procedures: l ) Cefinition of scoce 'and function. 2) Folleu-up activities of docu,ments returned to vendor " Approved l Except as i:oted l 3) Folleu-up activities of vender documents subnitted for Gibbs a j Hill approval I a) Interface with Sita Procurement Management Group 5) Interface with the Quality Assurance Start [-up/Turr:over Group on Vendor Document Package Veri'fications j 6) Determination of priorities I We request-that'you provide us with a target date for completioit of j procedure preparation and incorporation into the Prcject Guide and Procedures manual, tie trould also. like a ccmmitment from Quality i i Assurance to be actively involved in this effort and in the monitoring j en precedure implementation. l TGH-1_4_, Evatuation; The Vendor Document Closecut Procedure, Secticn V-7 of the Project Guide, was issued May t 21, 1980. Approximately seven Ven, dor Occument Incexes l (VDI's) and corresponding documents were reviewed for cegliance with j this procedure. . Sev'eral breakdowns were identified in ihe transmittal of changes from the PSG:to the. Print cept. group.for. incorporation onto the VOI.. These.. items I have. been discussed with".Geoffry Reiner who has 'ini.tiated appropriate. action. Since none' of the purchase. orders have j;one through' final close-out and these items would have been detected prior to.that time, we are not presenting the:n as deficiencies. Mcuever, we do feel that some added llh emphasis needs to be placed on transferring information onto, tha VOI cor-i o rectly and in a timely manner. Overall there has been considerable progress in the work that the Procure - ment Support Group is doing, particularly in the area of folicw-up to AEi1 and RFC vendor documents. This concern has been adequately. addressed.. ,Tg".Co ca eP 4 s i.
v s . ( (.
- xdit t!o. TGM-12 f'
.I 4 j Concern Tio, i l There are inconsistencias in noting DCA's on drawings, particularly en drawings depicting electrical cable tray. Instandas were noted where scme DCA's '.iere' documented on the drawings and some were not. All DCA's (or DECD's) issued against drawings should be treated in tne same i manner. 1 r i TGH-14 Evaluation: +. A drift ccpy of the prcposed change was reviewed. The change reads as i l folicws: .I "When design drawings are updated to' incorporate G1H i M or field initiated design changes, the appropriate ~. j design change documents wil.1 he listed on the drawing." I We acknowledge that in Gibbs & Hill's response to TGH-12 (GTN-45502) the target date for revising your precedure was Jt:ne 20, 1980. This item is beir.g held open pending revision of the prc cdure. Additionally, we request a status report on the issuance of your proposed Ce'C program. 8I i f - i l ~! -i t h' t I t I i. 4 ) (a*t L. -, - - ~,, u,
y,- -,e -e e i c C. e 4 6 ATTACHMENT B 4 NUDITNO.'TGH-14 I O , es t e 0 1 f l 4 4 3-
[ e C C. Unresolved Item No. 1-The Alison Control centract for Fire Detection Panels (ES-178) was reviewed as a result of questions raised during a recent TUGC0 release inspection. The following docsments were reviewed: (1) Documents given to release inspector by Alison;' (2) Deviation requests from Alison to G&H, and (3) DE/CD's issued by Gibbs & Hill. A discrepancy was identified with regard to the size of centrol wiring that Alison is allowed to use in their panels. ES-17B, paragraph 3.6.4.3a stated that nothing less than 14 awg could be used. Alison replied to G&H that they did not use anything larger than 18 awg. The spec was changed via DE/CD N-661 to read "nothing less than 18 awg" could be used. In comparing these documents to what our inspector was given, auditors noted that Alison stated their intent to use 22,18 and 14 awg. The vendor was subsequently contacted by G8H for clarification and indicated that size 22 aws control wire was being used in the panels for Comanche Peak. This item will'be held cpen until 6isolved by Gibbs & Hill. s t l I + J-
.(' ( Ccament: Tcm C[ stabile met with the auditors to give a review of the Damage ~ Study Frogram and answer questions with regard to precedural guide-lines, pregress to-date and CPSES site interfaces. This activity was not audited at this time. t I 6 e g e 6 y t I, e e 9 2., -+ v ,r
{. TEXAS UTILITIES CEF G5G CO.'IP.A.NY w,wmniose,<.r.w w uxn nw QGH-76 !!ay 6,1980 Mr. ?!abil Reddis Manager. Quality Assurance Gibbs & Hill, Inc. 393 Seventh Avenue flew York, lidw York 10001 C0!!ANCHE PFAX STEAM ELECTRIC STATICN TUGC0 QA AUDIT NOTIFICATICM GIBBS & HILL. INC. TGH-14 QA AUDIT FILE: TGH-it,'
Dear Mr. Keddis:
This will confirm our intent to perfor:n an audtt of your facility on June 10-13, 1930. ~ The audit scope will include procedural provisions for addressing' Damage Study questions as well as a follow-up of corrective action to TGH-12. The audit tean) will consist of: Debra Anderson . Teen Leader Antonio Vega Susan Spencer e are pinnning fer cur ::re-eudit discussion to begin on Tuesday, June 10, l 1980 at 9:00 a.s. 3.9:9: y:u have any questions, please contact Debra Anderson at 21*-Sil a!I*. i i Very truly yours, TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATI!!G CO. lh ~ d.ff. Chapman &!,n g{p ~ Manager, Quhlity Assurance Duc/Av/cLA:1jj cc: R. G. Tolson J. T. flerritt H. R. Rock e G ,A S e 4 .o
,e %= TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO31PANY 3004 BM1 AN TOW EA. D41.L.Mt.TEXA916. JOT QGH-76 May 6, 1980 Nr. Nabil Kaddis Manager Quality Assurance Gibbs & Hill, Inc. 393 Seventh Avenue New York, f;ew York 10C01 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION TUGC0 QA AUDIT NOTIFICATION GIBBS & HILL. INC. TGH-14 QA AUDIT FILE: TGH-14 /. t Gear Mr. Keddis: This will confirm our intent to perform an audit of your facility on June 10-13, 1980. The audit scope will include procedural provisions for ' addressing' Damage study questions as well as a follow-up of corrective action to TGH-12. The audit' team will consist of: I Debra Anderson - Team Leader Antonio Vega Susan Spencer We are planning for cur :re-audit discussion to begin on Tuesday, June 10, 1980 at 9:00 a.a. Sho::ld you have any questions, please contact Dabra Anderson at 214-653-49E2. Very truly yours. l TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO'. 1 .'C n I y Manager, Quhlity Assurance DNC/A#DLA:1jj l cc: R. G. Tolson J. T. Merritt H. R. Rock l l l l' ~ .-.}}