ML20137E342
| ML20137E342 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 11/19/1985 |
| From: | Rogers T, Wilson B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137E306 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-413-OL-85-04, 50-413-OL-85-4, NUDOCS 8511270240 | |
| Download: ML20137E342 (2) | |
Text
E
' D ENCLOSURE 1 EXAMINATION REPORT 413/0L-85-04 Facility Licensee: Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Facility Name: Catawba Nuclear Station-Facility Docket No.: 50-414 Oral Unit 1/ Unit 2 difference examinations were administered at the Catawba Nuclear Station near Clover, South Carolina.
9/95 Chief Examiner:
~
u a
Thomas Rogers Date Signed Approved by:
M Ilfli[ff m
BrucyA. Wilson, Section Chief Date Signed Summary:
Examinations on September 17, 1985, and October 21-22, 1985 Oral examinations were administered to twelve candidates in September; eleven of whom passed, and ten candidates in October; all of whom passed. The results of the sample examined indicates a satisfactory training program was administered to the forty-three applicants for Unit 2 Ifcenses. Based on this determination, thirteen Reactor Operator and twenty-nine Senior Reactor Operator licenses were amended to be licensed on Unit 2.
pgj!20240851120 o
DOCK 05000413 PDR
i.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Facility Employees Contacted:
- W. B. Barron, Operations Superintendent
- W. H. Barron, Senior Instructor
- D. Tower, Operations Engineer
- Attended Exit Meeting 2.
Examiners:
W. M. Dean W. G. Douglas L. L. Lawyer
- T. Rogers
- Chief Examiner 3.
Exit Meeting At the conclusion of the site visit, the examiners met with representatives of the plant staff to discuss the results of the examination. Those individuals who clearly passed the oral examination were identified.
There was one generic weakness (greater than 75 percent of candidates giving incorrect answers to one examination topic) noted during the oral ext,1-
. nation..The area of below normal performance was the ability of operators to determine the source location of radiation upon receiving an auxiliary building high radiation alarm.
The cooperation given to the examiners and the effort to ensure an atmos-phere in the control room conducive to oral examinations was also noted and appreciated.
i L.