ML20137C231

Notice of Violation from Insp on 851001-1207

ML20137C231
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	01/02/1986
From:	Chrissotimos N NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137C216	List: IR 05000254/1985027 ML20137C212 ML20137C231 ML20137C259
References
50-254-85-27, 50-265-85-30, NUDOCS 8601160245
Download: ML20137C231 (2)

Text

__-

s NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket Nos. 50-254 Quad Cities Unit 1 and 2 50-265 As a result of the inspection conducted October 1 through December 7, 1985, and in accordance with the General Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C), the following violations were identified:

1. Appendix A Section 3.F. to Operating license No. DPR-29 and No. DPR-30 required that modifications identified in Paragraphs 3.1.1 through 3.1.13 of NRC's Fire Protection Safety Evaluation (SE), dated July 27, 1979, be completed acr.ording to the schedule in Table 3.1 of the SE and supplements thereto. Specifically, Item No. 5 in Paragraph 3.1.1 required the installation of refuel floor fire detection monitors by December 30, 1979.

Contrary to the above, said fire detection monitors were never installed.

This is a Severity level IV violation (Supplement 1).

2. Criterion XVI of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 states: " Measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected. In the case of significant conditions adverse to quality, the measures shall assure that the cause of the condition is determined and corrective action taken to 5 preclude repetition. The identification of the significant condition adverse to quality, the cause of the condition, and the corrective action taken shall be documented and reported to appropriate levels of management."

Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to properly and accurately evaluate the concerns raised by the Ruskin Manufacturing Company's 10 CFR Part 21 report submitted to the licensee on November 6, 1984.

The 10 CFR 21 report indicated that test methods originally employed by Ruskin may not have accurately depicted actual field conditions for dampers installed inside ducting and may also fail to open under normal flow conditions. The inspectors identified one damper (No. CEC. 1/2-9472-01) which was required to close under flow conditions as discussed in the Ruskin report but which had not been identified by the Licensee and therefore no corrective actions had been taken.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement 1).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or-explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance: (1) corrective l

8601160245 860102 '

PDR ADOCK 05000254 G PDR

Notice of Violation 2 action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

s Date

} - 9 8(, f/.Y -- -

. N. 'f. Cihrisdotimos, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 1

i r

I f

i

, .- _ -_ _ , , , - ,