ML20136G945
| ML20136G945 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 11/19/1985 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20136G923 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8511220507 | |
| Download: ML20136G945 (3) | |
Text
.-
em.
/
o UNITED STATES
- g f
p, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t
j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
/
NOV 191985
- .+
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-30 UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 DOCKET N0. 50-483
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated August 12, 1985, Union Electric Company (the licensee) requested an amendment to Facility Operating License No. NPF-30 for L
operation of the Callaway Plant in Callaway County, Missouri.
The amendment approves a modification to Page 6-4 of the Callaway Technical Specifications (TS) consisting of a revision to the unit organizational chart.
2.0 EVALUATION The change requests a revision to Technical Specification Figure 6.2-2 to show an organizational title change from the Supervisor, Radwaste to the Superintendent, Radwaste. The requested change does not alter the Superintendent, Radwaste reporting relationship to the Assistant Manager, j
Technical Services, nor does it require a change in the position responsi-bility or the minimum qualifications required of the position incumbent.
r The change is in accordance with the guidance provided in Standard Review Plan, NUREG-0800 and does not adversely affect or endanger the health and l
safety of the public.
It is, therefore, acceptable.
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
This amendment involves a change in the installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.
The staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Comission has previously issued a proposed finding that this amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding. Accordingly, this amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR Section 51.22(c)(9).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environ-mental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
8511220507 851119 PDR ADOCK 05000403 P
4.0 CONCLUSION
We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner; and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributors:
P. W. McLaughlin, LQB T. W. Alexion, LB#1 Dated: NOV 19155 1
t
g--
i-IIOV 191985 (AMENDMENT NO. 10 - CALLAWAY)
DATED:
NRC PDR Local PDR PRC System NSIC LBf1 Rdg MRushbrook TAlexion P0'Connor TNovak JSaltzman, SAB OELD, RPerlis CMiles HDenton JRutberg' AToalston Reba Diggs, LFMB JPartlow BGrimes
-EJordan LHarmon DBrinkman, SSPB TBarnhart(4)
Inez Bailey i
l l