ML20136D795

Preservice Exam Limitations Rept

ML20136D795
Person / Time
Site:	Hope Creek
Issue date:	11/30/1985
From:	Feige E, Flach W SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
To:
Shared Package
ML20136D760	List: ML20136D754 ML20136D795
References
NUDOCS 8511210370
Download: ML20136D795 (60)

Text

, _

t

?. ,

HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1

) PRESERVICE EIAMINATION LIMITATIONS REPORT

)

SwRI Project 17-3690

)

)

Prepared for Public Service Electric and Gas Company

) Nuclear Department P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 i

) November 1985 i

Prepared by App d by l

.' (

) Edward J. Feige Project Engineer Waynd'I Directo lach f ,

(  ;

i Inspection Engineering Section Departa e of Engineering Services  !

Nondestructive Evaluation Services and Technology Division

)

fy1NjDOCMo370 851118 E 05000354 l PDR h .

. ~ . _ _ . - .

_ . _ . ._ . ,- .m ____..m___.._., __ . .-_.-,,,_,__._,,_,_.____,.___._._,_m_ ,

O, ,

O TABLE OF CONTENTS O

bzs

1. INTRODUCTION 1 0 2. DISCUSSION 2

3. LIMITATION

SUMMARY

TABLES 3 4 CONCLUSION 4 O

O O

O O l O

O

). o D

Hope Creek Generating Station, Unit 1

] Preservice Examination Limitations Report

1. Introduction D Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) was contracted by Public Service Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G) to perform the preservice examination (PSI) of the Hope Creek Generating Station (HCGS). Examinations were performed in accordance with the PSI Plan during the period of September 1983 through October 1985. During this period, any examination area coverage limitations which were encountered were 3 recorded on data record sheets. This report summarizes and documents the examination area limitations which limit Code coverage based on the examination requirements of ASME Section II,1977 Edition with Addenda through the Summer 1978 and NRC Regulatory Guide 1.150.

O 2. Discussion PSE&G, assisted by SwRI, focused significant attention to minimizing examination area limitations prior to, and during, the PSI at HCGS.

As a result of these preparations, minimal examination area O limitations were encountered. An SwRI Access Engineering program was implemented during plant design and construction to maximize examination area access. This program evaluated access and provided design guidance to PSE&G and Bechtel Corporation for piping, components, and the reactor pressure vessel (RPV). Examples of design criteria to facilitate examination included weld surface profiling, 9 minimum access clearances for piping and components, and counterboring to minimize inside surface indication resolution questions. The Access Engineering Program also designed track placement on the RPV to maximize the vessel mechanized examination coverage. As a result all vessel welds received at least partial volumetric coverage.

G During the performance of the PSI onsite activities, PSE&G was notified of the examination area limitations that were encountered.

Each limitation was evaluated by PSE&G to determine alternative

, approaches which could afford a more thorough coverage of the Code-specified examination volume or area.

O 1

S

I' i

t

?, ,

SwRI was requested to provide expertise in making recommendations of feasible alternatives to the planned examinations. This process was expanded to include consideration of future Codes and ISI conditions which may make alternative examination techniques more or less valuable as determined on a case-by-case basis. The result of this ongoing process was the completion of the PSI with the minimization of limitations to the examination coverage as required by the Code.

Special examination technique developments, supported by PSE&G, maximized examination coverage during the course of the PSI. These include a UT technique for weld examination through corrosion resistant clad piping in the Reactor Recirculation System. This process involved basic research centered on ultrasonic transducer

) development and testing on mockups which were a result of PSE&G efforts to ensure similiarity to the "as-built" condition of the CRC welds at HCGS. An examination technique for the RPV closure stud was

also developed to provide the examination coverage specified in the

! Code Case N307-1. PSE&G and SwRI also agreed to the utilization of a newly introduced automated ultrasonic examination system (AMDATA) which provided additional capability for minimizing limitations .

attributable to weld joint configurations. Further benefits of the AMDATA system included comprehensive recording of the test data for I

future comparison during ISI conditions. These programs attest to the fact that PSE&G and SwRI performed the PSI at HCGS with full j consideration of the factors that could maximize the effectiveness as i determined by evaluation of the most minute details.

J l Even with a program of such proportions, limitations of two basic l types were encountered. Even with extensive examination procedure l development, generic limitations were encountered inherent tc

- examination areas and state-of-the-art examination techniques.

i Inherent to the ultrasonic examinations where a full volumetric Q coverage is required from the entry surface to the opposite surface is l the limitation at the near surface due to sound beam entry noise. The second type of limitation is a result of scanning limitations due to

component configuration or physical restrictions. For example, a l limitation to scanning due to an adjacent bracket or nozzle would l prohibit the placement of the scanning device or transducer in a

] particular area and a scanning limitation would result. For

examination areas where track placement was impractical and where j radiation exposure is considered to be acceptable for examiners during

! subsequent ISIS, the mechanized examinations were supplemented with manual examination techniques .

t 2

O

O. .

O

3. Limitation Summary Tables

'O The following tables provide details on the limitations which were encountered during the PSI at HCGS. The areas are listed in the order

found in the PSI Plan. The information in the tables is supplemented with figures as required. Table 1 of this report provides information i

as follows:

-O The first column, " Class / Category / Item No.", identifies the ASME Code class, category, and item number for the specific examination area identified in the second column. The third column, t

" Identification of Limitation" identifies the type of limitation and extent. The following should be noted:

O 1) Examination volume limitations may be encountered, even when scanning of the complete weld length is possible.

2) In some cases, physical scanning limitations do not limit beam components from obtaining coverage beyond the physical limitations. This is possible when the beam component can be E) directed to pass under the physical limitations, thus increasing total examination volume coverage.

3) Pressure vessel limitations are identified as a percent of weld length accessible and as a percent of the Code-required volume obtained.

,d

4) For piping, limitations are identified by their physical location or "L" dimension.

The fourth column identifies the " Basis For Relief" to include specific information with respect to the type of interference.

The fif th column, " Alternate Examinations", describes examinations which were performed in accordance with the PSI Plan, when more than one technique is required for coverage. For example, where more than one angle coverage is required, the angles with which coverage was obtained are noted.

O i

3 O

C) . .

O The " Remarks" column provides clarification of actual Code

() examination area limitations and information specific to later Code editions which may change the coverage requirements for subsequent inservice examinations. Where the Code specifies more than one method and complete coverage is obtained, this is also noted under

" Remarks".

Table 2 provides a detailed listing of the percentage of volume C) coverage for reactor vessel welds. The information provided includes percent coverage for each angle used, as well as the cumulative coverage. The cumulative coverage is defined as the percent coverage achieved with at least one angle-beam component.

_ The attached figures present a pictorial representation of the la examination area coverage. Figures are presented for the vessel welds and nozzle inner radii. ,

4. Conclusion O

The PSI program at HCGS was performed with full consideration of the limitations and capabilities of the nondestructive examination methods available. PSE&G and SwRI cooperated fully in an effort to ensure that the PSI was performed with the maximum coverage fitasible.

This report is the documentation of the areas in which limitt cions

[3 were present that could not be eliminated through the combinnd efforts of PSE&G and SwRI.

O a

k O

4 O

m

._._._.. . . _ _ . - - . . -.- .. _ - . - . - . . . - . - - _ . - - - - - - . _ = _ _ _ ,

O , .

4 4

4 iO I

l.

i

!O i

lO iO i'

Table 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS i

!O

!O 5

4 l

!O i

iO i

I

!O

!.O

7 - --- u U U U

~

O U J O U' ,

U.

Table 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS ,

SYSTEM: Re.sctor Vessel ,

Class Category Identification of item No. Examination Area Limitatfon Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks 1 RPVI-W1 Complete volumetric exam- Flange configuration pro- None. See Figures I and 4.

B-A Shell-to-Flange ination of base metal htbits scanning from the See Table 2, Sheet 1.

4 R1.10 Circuaferential Weld adjacent to weld was not flange side of the weld. Examination was performel obtained. Approxisately Thermocouple pads limited manually.

97% of the weld length acanning from the shell was accessible for scan- side of the weld in two ning. Approximately 92% regions.

of the Code-defined volume was examined with at least one angle beam component.

I RPVI-W4 Complete volumetric cow- Proximity of the N12 None. See Figure 1.

1,- A Shell-to-Shell erage of weld and base nozzles !!ntts scanning See Table 2. Sheet 1.

39.11 Circumferential WelJ metal was not obtained. from tw>th sides of the Examination was performed Approximately 90% of the weld in four regions. manually.

weld length was acces-

.sible for scanning.

Approximately 91% of the Code volume was examined u with at least one angle Leam component.

1 RPVI-US Co.splete volumetric cow- Proximity of N4 nozzles None. See Figure 1.

8-A Shell-to-Shell erage of the weld and limits scanning from See Table 2, Sheet 1.

B1.11 Circumferential Weld base metal was not above the veld in sin F.xamination performed obtained. Approximately locations. Proximity of mechanized.

62% of the weld length N5 nozzles limits scan-was accessible for scan- ning from either side of ning. Approximately 51% the veld in four regions.

of the Code volume was location of nozzles pro-examined with at least h1 bits installing verti-one angle beam compooent. cal track in three locations.

I RPVI-W6 Complete volumetric cow- The proximity of N16 and None. See Figure 1.

8-A Shell-to-Dell ersge of the weld an.1 N17 nozzles prohibits See Table 2, Sheet 1.

81.11 Circumferen-tal Weld hise metal was not scanning frca either side Examination performed obtained. Approximately of the. weld in foer loca- mechanized.

41% of the weld length tions. 1.ocation of nozzles was accessible for scan- prohlhtts installation of ning. Approulmately 51% ettrumferential track and of the Code volume was installation of vertical examined with at least track in four locations.

one angle beam component. locattons.

NOTE: A 2% volumetric limitation inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Weld Examinations is the result of laterf ace noise at the souel beam ent ry at the outside vessel surface.

Table 1 COMPONEfE AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CO!TI'D)

SYSTEM: Reactor Vessel (Cont'd)

Class Category IdentifIcatton of

. Ites No. F.zamimation Area Limitation Basis for Rellef Alternate Examinations Remarks 1 RPVI-W1 100% of the weld length N/A. None. See Figure 2.

8-A Shell-to-Shell was accessible for scan- See Table 2, Sheet 1.

al.11 Circumferential Weld ning. Approximately 98% Examination performed of the Code volume was mechantreJ.

examined with at least one angle beam component.

1 RPvt-US Complete volumetric coir- Interference from welded None. See Figure 2.

B-A Shell-to-tower llead erage of weld and base insulation pads Itatted See Table 2, Sheet I.

51.11 Circumferential Weld metal was not obtained. scanning at eight loca- Examination performed Approximately 87% of the Lions and proximity of mechanized.

weld length was acces- the N1 nozzles tinited sthle for scanntag. scanning at two locations.

Approutmately 91% of the Code volume was examined with at least one angle beam component.

I trVI-Wit-1 100% of the weld length N/A. None. See Figure 1.

S-A Longitudinal Weld was accessible for scan- See Table 2, Sheet 1.

• Bl.12 9 10 Deg ning. #pproximately 98% Examination gerforced of the Code volume was manually.

examined with at least one angle beam component.

I RrVI-Wit-2 100% of the weld length N/A. None. See Figure 1.

8-A longitudinal Weld was accessible for scas- See Table 2 Sheet 2.

Bl.12 0 150 Deg alng. Approutmately 98% Exaetnation performed of the Code volume was manually.

examined with at least one angle beam component.

1 RrVI-Wit-3 Complete volumetric cow- Prostetty of nozzles N3C Nune. See Figure 1.

B-A longiteJinal Weld erage of the base metal and N3D limiteil scanning See Table 2, Sheet 2.

51.12 0 270 Deg was not obtained. 100% in two locations. Examinattaa performed of the weld length was manually.

accessible for scanning.

Approximately 98% of the Code voluss was examined with at least one angle beam component.

NtJTE: A 2% volumetric llettation inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Wld Examinations is the result of Interface unise at the sound beam entry at the outside vessel surface.

O O O O O O O O O O

=

O Tzble 1 COMPONEh*T AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) ,

SYSTDt: Reactor Vessel (Cont'd)

Class Category Identiftratinn of item No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Euantaattons Remarks I trvl-W12-1 100% of the weld length N/A. None. See Figure 1.

8-A Longitudinal Weld was accessible for scan- See Table 2. Sheet 2.

81.12 0 !!O Deg ning. Approximately 98% Examination performed anne-of the Code volume was ally amt mechantzed.

examined with at least one angle beam component.

I RPV!-Wl2-2 Complete volumetric cov- Proximity of N4D ar.d NSB None. See Figure 1.

5-A Longitudinal Weld erage of the weld anJ mozzles Itatts scanalag See Table 2, Sheet 2.

51.12 @ 2M beg base metal was not la two locations. Exaatnation performeJ manu-obtained. Approntaately Welded lasulation pad ally and mechantzed. .

96% of the weld length limits scanatng to one was accessible for scan- location.

atng. Approximately 97Z of the CoJe volume was examined with at least one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-U12-3 100% of the veld length U/A. None. See Figure 1.

" B-A longitudinal Weld was accessible for scan- See Table 2. Sheet 2.

51.12 9 350 Deg ning. Approximately 98Z Examinattom performed mann-of the Code volene was ally and mechanized.

examined with at least one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-W13-1 Complete volumetric cor- Proximity of N17A nozzle None. See Figure 1.

B-A longitoJinal Weld erage of the weld and limits scanolog in one See Table 2. Sheet 2.

s1.12 9 35 Deg base metal was not location. Examination performed obtained. 100% cf the mechanized.

weld length was acces- -

sible for scanning.

Approntaately 79% of the CnJe volume was examined with at least one angle ,

beam component.

1 RrVt-WI3-2 Complete volumetric cs e- Proximity of the N9A, None. See Figure 1.

B-A longitudinal Weld erage of the weld and M175, and N165 nozzles See Table 2. Sheet 2.

B1.12 @ 155 Deg base metal was not limits scanning to two Examination performed obtained. Approximately locations. aechantzed.

68% of the weld length was .ccessible for scan-ning. Approximately 64Z of the Code volume was examined with at least one angle beam component.

m7tE: A 2% volumetric limitation inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel WelJ Examinations is Lt.e result of Interface noise at the sound beam entry at the outstJe vessel surface.

O O O O O O O O O O O 1 .

Tchle 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) .

SYSTEN: Reactor Vessel (Cont'd)

Class l

l Category Identification of Item No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Rettef Alternate Examinations Remarks 1 RPVI-W13-3 100% of the weld length N/A. None. See Figure 1.

3-A 1.ongitudinal Weld was accessible for scan- See Table 2, Sheet 3.

31.12 9 215 Des atog. Approminately 98% Exemination performed of the Code volume was mechanized.

examined with at least one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-W14-1 100% of the weld length N/A. None. See Figure 2.

s-A longitudinal Weld was accessible for scan- See Table 2 Sheet 1.

Bl.12 @ 90 Deg alag. Approutmately 98% Examination performed of the Code volume was mechanized.

examined with at least one angle beam component.

I RPVI-W14-2 100% of the veld length N/A. None. See Figure 2.

3-A Longitudinal Weld was accessible for scan- See Table 2. Sheet 3.

51.12 9 210 Deg ning. Approximately 98% Examination performed of the Code volume was mechanized.

examined with at least CD one angle beam compoacot.

I trVI-W14-3 Complete volumetric cov- Frouletty of N17D and Mcne. See Figures 1 and 2.

5-A Longitudinal Wolf erage of the weld and N16D nozzles Itatts See Table 2, Sheet 3.

Bl.12 @ 330 Deg base metal was not scanning at the top of Examination performed obtained. Approximately the weld. mechantred.

96% of the veld length was accessible for scan-ning. Approximately 94%

of the Code volume was examined with at least one angle beam component.

1 RPV!-W15-1 Complete volumetric cow- Prostetty of NI A and None. See Figure 2.

B-4 Longitudinal Weld erage of the weld and N2A nozzles limite See Table 2. Sheet 3.

51.12 9 18 Deg base metal was not scanning in two areas of Examination performed obtained. Approximately the weld. mechanized.

91% of the weld length was accessible for scan- ,

ning. Approutmately 81%

of the Code voli.ne was examineJ with at least one angle beam component.

l l

E8TE: A 21 volumetric Ilmitattoa inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Weld Examinations is the result of laterface nulse at the sound beam ent ry at the outside vessel surface.

• T: bis 1 COMPONEhT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) .

SYSTDt: Reactor hssel (Cont'd)

Class Category Identification of tree No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Exaatnations Remarks I RPvt-W15-2 100% of the weld length N/A. None. See Figure 2.

B-A LongitmJtaal Weld was accessthle for scam- See Table 2. Sheet 1.

31.12 9 134 Deg ning. Lpproximately 93% Examination performeJ of the Code volume was mechantmed.

examined with at least one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-W15-1 100% of the welJ length N/A. None. See Figure 2.

B-A longtteJinal Weld was accessible for scam- See Table 2. Sheet 3.

Bl.12 9 258 Deg ning. Approximately 98% . ExaeInstion performed of the Code volume was mechantzed.

enastned with at least one angle beam component.

1 RPV!-W16-1 Congflete volumetric cow- Support skirt attachment None. See Figure 2.

B-A tower HeaJ erage of the weld and limits scanning in one See Table 2. Sheet 4.

51.22 W rtJional Weld base metal was not location. Examination performed 9 22.5 Deg obtained. Approximately mechanized.

82% of the weld length

• was accessible for scan-ning. Approximately 65%

of the code volume was enantned with at least one angle bene component.

I RPV!-W16-2 Complete volumetric cov- Support skirt attaphaent None. See Figure 2.

B-A Lower HeaJ erage of the wels and limits scanning in one See Table 2 Sheet 4.

Bl.22 tieridional Weld base metal was not location. Exaetnation performed 9 67.5 Deg obtained. Approximately mechantred.

82% of the weld length was accessible for scan-ning. Approximately 64%

of the Code volume was examined with at least or.e angle beam component.

I RPVI-W16-3 Complete volumetric cov- Support skirt attachment None. See Figure 2.

B-4 tower Head erage of the weld and Itatts scanning in one See Table 2 Sheet 4.

81.22 Merldtonal WeIJ base metal was not location. Examination gwrformed 6 112.5 Des obtained. Approximately mechantzed.

82% of the weld length was accessible for scan-ning. Approstaately 65%

of the Code volume was examined with at least one angle beas component.

NOTE: A 22 volumetric Itattation inherent to the Reactor Fressure Ve~ssel WelJ Examinations is the result of interface noise at the sound beam ent ry at the outside vessel surface.

h - _-_

Tcble 1 '

COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) ,

SYSTDt: Reactor Vessel (Cont'd) 8 Class Category IdentifIcatton.of Ites No. Examination Area Limitation Easts for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks 1 RPVI-W16-4 Complete volumetric cow- Support skirt attachment - None. See Figure 2.

5-A Lower Head erage of the weld and limits scanning in one See Table 2 Sheet 4.

31.22 Meridional Weld base metal was not location. Examinattan performed i 9 157.5 Deg obtained. Approximately mechanized. i 321 of the weld length l was accessible for scan-ning. Approxiestely 65%

of the Code volume was exantned with at least one angle beas component.

1 R PVI-W16-5 Complete valueetric cov- Support skirt attachment None. See Figure 2.

B-A lower Head erage of the weld and limits scanning in one See Table 2 Sheet 4.

31.22 Meridional Weld base metal was not locattan. Exaelmation performed 9 202.5 Deg obtained. Approstaately mechanized.

82% of the weld length was accessible for scan-ning. Approximately 66%

of the Code volume was I g examine'd with at least o one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-W16-6 Complete valueetric cow- Support skirt attachment None. See Figure 2.

B-A Lower Head erage of the weld and limits scanning in one See Table 2 Sheet 4.

B1.22 Merldtonal Weld base metal was not location. Examination performed 9 247.5 Deg obtained. Approximately mechanized.

82% of the veld length was accessible for scan-ning. Approximately 66%  !

of the code volume was exaetned with at least .,

one angle beam component.

I 1 RPV1-W16-7 Complete volumetric cov- Sespport skirt attachment None. See Figure 2.

8-A lower Head erage of the weld and limits scanning in one See Table 2,' Sheet 4. l 81.22 Herldtonal Weld base metal was not location. Examination performed

? 292.5 Deg obtained. Approximately mechanized.

82% of the weld length was accessible for scan-  ;

ning. Approximately 66%  !

of the Code volume was examined with at least one angle beam component.

t l

NOTE: A 2% volumetric limitation inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Weld Examinations is the result of Interface noise at the sound beam entry at the outside vessel surface. .

Table 1 COMPONENT-AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) ,.

SYSTEN: ~ Reactor Vessel (Cont'd)

Class Category . . Identification of Ites No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations , Remarks-1 RPVI-W16-8 Complete volumetric cov- Support ' skirt attachment None. See Figure 2.

B-A Lower Head .

,etage of the weld and limits scanning in one See Table 2, Sheet 5.

B1.22 Meridional Weld base metal was not location. Examination performed 9 337.5 Deg obtained. Approximately . mechanized.

82% of the weld . length

• was accessible for scan-ning. Approximately 66%

of the Code volume .was  !

examined with at least one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-W9 Complete coverage of Proximity of control rod None. See Figure 2.

B-A Lower llead Dome the base metal was not drive mechanisms limits See Table 2. Sheet 5.

81.21 Circumferential Weld obtained. 100% of the scanning from below the Examination performed weld length was acces- weld but does not appre- mechanized.

sible for. scanning. ciably impact coverage.

Approximately 98% of the Code volume was examined with at least one angle beam component.

H I RPVI-W20 Complete volumetric cov- Flange configuration None. See Figure 3.

B-A Closure llead-to-Flange erage of the weld and prohibits scanning from See Table 2, Sheet 5.

Bl.40 Circumferential Weld base metal was not the flange side of the Examination performed manu-obtained. 100% of the weld. ally. Surface examination veld length was acces- coverage was obtained.

sible for scanning.

Approximately 88% of the Code volume was examined with at least one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-W22 Complete volumetric cov- N/A. None.

B-A See Table 2 Sheet 5.

Closure !!ead Dome erage of the weld and Examination performed B1.21 Circumferential Weld base metal was not manually.

obtained. 100% of the veld length was acces-sible for scanning. '

Approximately 98% of the Code volume was examined with at least one angle beam component.

NUTE: A 2% volumetric limitation inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Wald Examinations is the result of interf ace noise at the sound beam entry at the outside vessel surface.

O O -0 0 O O* O O- O O O

/

Table 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS'(CONT'D) .

SYSTEH: Reactor Vessel (Cont'd)

Class Category Identification of item No. Examination Area Limitation B1 min for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks 1 RPVI-W24A 100% of the weld length N/A. None. See Table 2, Sheet 5.

B-A Closure IIcad was accessible for scan- Examination performed' Bl.22 Herldtonal Weld ning. Approximately 98% manually.

of the Code volume was examined with at least one angle beam component.

I RPV1-W248 100% of the veld length N/A. None. See Table 2, Sheet 5.

R-A Closure Ilead was accessible for scan- Exantnation performed 81.22 Meridional Weld ning. Approximately 981 manually.

of the Code volume was examined with at least one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-W24C 100% of the weld length N/A. None. See Table 2, Sheet 5.

B-A Closure Ilead was accessible for scan- Examination performed 81.22 Neridional Weld alng. Approximately 98% manually.

of the code volume was examined with at least g one angle beam component.

N 1 RPV1-W24D 100% of the weld length N/A. None. See Table 2, Sheet 5.

B-A Closure Ilead was accessible for scan- Examination performed Bl.22 Heridional Weld ning. Approximately 981 manually.

of the Code volume was examined with at leant one angle beam component. -

1 RPV1-W24E 100% of the weld length N/A. None. See Table 2, Sheet 5.

B-A Closure llead was accessible for scan- Examination performed 81.22 Heridional Weld utng. Approximately 98% manually.

of the Code volume was examined with at least one angle beam component.

I RPVI-W24F 100% of the veld length N/A. None. See Table 2 Sheet 5.

8-A Closure Ilead was accessible for scan- Examination performed 51.22 Meridional Weld ning. Approximately 98% manually.

of the Code volume was examined with at least one angle beam component.

NafE: A 2% volumetric limitation inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Weld Examinations is the result of interface noise at the sound beam entry at the outside vessel surface.

-O O O O O O- .O . O O O- 0 1

I Table 1 COMPONElR'AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D)

SYSTEN: Reactor Vessel (Cont'd)

?

Class Category Identification of item No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks i

' None. See. Table 2, sheet 5.

1 RPVI-W24C _

100% of the veld length N/A.

B-A Closure Head was accessible for scan- Examination performed

]

81.22 Neridtonal Weld ning. Approximately 98% manually.

of the Code volume was examined with at least j one angle beam component.

i I RPV!-W24H 100% of the weld length N/A. None. See Table 2. Sheet 5.

4 5-A Closure Head was accessible for scan- Examination performed i 81.22 Neridional Weld ning. Approximately 98% manually.

of the Code volume was >

examined with at least one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-NIA Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 5.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 5.

B3.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. Approximately forging. A welded insula- nized. Approximately 89% of 97% of the weld length tion pad prohibits scan- the required volume as defined s was accessible for scan- ning f rom a small area in the 80/W80 Edition of the

" ning.~ Approximately 55% below nozzle. Code was examined effectively of the Code volume was with at least one angle beam e examined with at least component.

4 one angle beam component.

I

!  ! RPVI-NIB Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 5.

! 8-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 5.

I Bl.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle . Examination performed mecha-

obtained. Approximately forging. Interference nized. Approximately 82% of 90% of the veld length. from the bioshield door the required volume as defined l was accessible for scan- sliding rail assembly in the 80/W80 Edition of the ning. Approximately 56% limits scanning in one with at least one angle beam i of the Code-required location. component.

! volume was examined with at least one angle beam j component.

I

I RPVI-N2A , Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 6.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

Bl.10 required volume was not tion of the _ full nozzle Examination performed mecha-

} obtained. 100% of the forging. nized. Approximately 91% of j weld length was acces- the required volume as defined sible for scanning. in the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 68% of the Code was examined effectively j Code-required volume was with at least one angle heae i examined with at least component.

1 one angle beam component.

, NOTE: A 21 volumetric limitation inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Wold Examinations is the result of interface noise at the sound beam entry at the outstJe vessel surface.

O O O O O O O O- 0 0 O Table 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) .

SYSTEM: Reactor Vessel (Cont'd) .

Class Category identification of item No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks I

1 RPVI-N2B Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. . See Figure 6.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits ef fective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

81.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of the forging. nized. Approximately 91% of weld length was acces- the required volume as defined sible for scanning. in the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 68% of the Code was examined ef fectively -

Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at least component .

one angle beam component.

I RPVI-N2C Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 6.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

53.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of the forging. Proximity of nized. Approximately 79% of weld length was acces- N8 nozzle limits scanning the required volume as defined sible for scanning. in one location but Joes in the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 68% of the not appreciably limit Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was volume coverage, with at least one angle beam

,, examined with at least component .

• - one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-N2D Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 6.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits ef fective examina- See Table 2, sheet 6.

, B1.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-1 obtained. 100% of the forging. Proximity of nized. Approximately 79% of weld length was acces- N8 nozzle limits scanning the required volume as defined sible for scanning. In one location but does in the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 68% of the not appreciably limit Code was examined ef fectively Code-required volume was volume coverage. with at least one angle team examined with at least component .

one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-N2E Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 6.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

83.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-t obtained. 100% of the forging. nized. Approximately 91% of l weld length was acces- the required volume as defined i sible for scanning. in the 80/W80 edition of the Approximately 68% of the Code was examined ef fectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at least component.

one angle beam component.

i NOTE: A 2% volumetric limitation inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Weld Examinations is the result of interface noise at the sound beam entry at the outside vessel surface.

o - m o o o o v u m wm u-Table 1 COMPONENT AND' PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) ,

SYSTEH: Reactor Vessel (Cont'd)

Class Category Identification of Item No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks 1 RPVI-N2F Complete volumetric exam Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 6.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2, sheet 6.

51.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of the forging. nized. Approximately 91% of weld length was acces- the reqoired volume as defined sible far scanning. In the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 68% of the . Code was examined ef fectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at least com ponent . -

one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-N2C Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 6.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2. Sheet 6.

51.10 required volumn was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of the forging. ntzed. Approximately 91% of weld length was acces- the required volume as defined sible for scanning. in the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 68% of the Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at least component.

(( one angle bean component.

I RPVI-N2tl Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 6.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- Ilmits ef fective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

83.10 required volume was 'not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of the forging. Proximity of ntzed. Approximately 79% of weld length was acces- N8 nozzle limits scanning the required volume as defined sible for scanning. In one location but does in the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 68% of the not appreciably limit Code was examined ef fectively t

Code-required volume was. volume coverage. with at least one angle beam examined with at least com ponent .

one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-N2J Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 6.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld inatinn of the Code- limits ef fective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

Bl.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of the forging. Proximity of nized. Approximately 79% of weld length was acces- M8 nozzle limits scanning the required volume as defined sible for scanning. In one location but does in the 80/WBO Edition of the Approximately 68% of the not appreciably limit Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was volume coverage. with at least one angle beam exanined with at least component.

one angle heam component.

NOTE: A 2% volumetric Italtation inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Weld Examinations in the result of interf ace noise at the sound beam entry at the outside vessel surface.

s Toble 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) .

SYSTEH: 'teactor Vessel (Cont'd)

Class Category Identification of item No. Eximination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks 1 RPVI-N2K Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 6.

B-b Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

83.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of the forging. nized. Approximately 91% uf weld length was xces- the required volume as defined stble fer scanning. In the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 68% of the Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at least com ponent .

one angle beam component.

I RPV!-N3A Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 7.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits ef fectivo examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

83.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed manu-obtained. 100% of the forging. ally. Approximately 84% of weld length was acces- the required volume as defined sible for scanning. In the 89/W80 Edition of the Approximately 44% of the Code wae examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at least component.

$ one angie beam component.

I RPVI-N3B Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 7.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

83.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed manu-obtained. 100% of the forging. ally. Approximately 84% of weld length was acces- the required volume as derined sible for scanning. In the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately $4% of the Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at least com ponent .

one angle beam component.

I RPVI-N3C Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 7.

8-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits ef fective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

83.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed manu-obtained. 100% of the forging. ally. Approximately 84% of weld length was acces- the required volume as defined sible for scanning. In the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 44% of the Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at least component.

one angle beam component.

NOTE: A 2% volumetric limitation Inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Weld Examinstions is the result of interface noise at the sound beam entry at the outside vessel surface.

-O O O O 'O O O O O O O-Table 1 COMPONE!E AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) .

SYSTEM: Reactor vessel (Cont'd)

Class Category Identification of item No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks-1 RPVI-N3D Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle, configuration None. See Figiere 7.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2. Sheet 6.

Bl.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed manu-obtained. 100% of the forging. Proxtetty'of ally. Approximately 84% of weld length was acces- N8 nozzle limits scanning the required volume as defined sible for scanning. In one location but does in the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 44% of the not appreciably limit Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was coverage. with at least one angle beam examined with at least component.

one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-N4A Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 8.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

Bl.10 require.1 volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of the forging. nized. Approximately 81% of weld length was acces- the required volume as defined sible for scanning. In the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 53% of the Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at least component.

y one angle beam component.

I RPVI-N4B Complete volumetric Nozzle coufiguration None. See Figure 8.

B-D, Nozzle-to-Shell Weld examination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

B3.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. Approximately forging. Interference ntzed. Approximately 71% ot 86% of the weld length from a thermocouple the required volume as defined was accessible for scan- bracket limits scanning in the 80/W80 Edition of the ning. Approximately 48% in one azimuth location. Code was examined effectively.

of the Code-required with at least one angle beam volume was examined with component.

at least one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-N4C Complete volumetric Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 8.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld examination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

53.10 required volume 1s not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. Approximately forging. Proximity of ntred. Approximately 66% of 79% of the weld length N11 nozzle limits scan- the required volume as defined was accessthle for scan- ning in one azimuth in the 80/W80 Edition of the

, ning. Approstmately 44% location. Code was examined effectively of the Code-required with at least one angte beam volume was examined with component .

at least one angle beam ,

component.

NOTE: A 2% volumetric limitation inherent to the Restor Pressure Vessel Weld Examinations is the result of interface noise at the sound beam ent ry at the outstJe vessel surface. .

U U U U U U U_ ,

Table 1 srSret: Reactor vessel (Cont'd)

1. 1. 1. # UU" NU# D

• Class Category Identification of item No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Rema rk s 1 Rrvi-N4D Complete volismetric Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 8.

B-D nozzle-to-Shell Weld examination of the Code- limits ef fective examina- See Table 2. Sheet 6.

B1.10 required volume w.as not tion.of the full nnzale Examination performed mecha-obtained. Approximately forging. Interference ntzed. Approximately 71% of 86% of the weld length from a thermocouple the required volume as defined was accessible for scan- bracket limits scanning in the 80/W80 Edition of the ning. Approximately 48% in one azimuth location. Code was examined effectively of the Code-required with at least one angle beam volume was exavined with component.

at least one angle beam component .

1 RPVI-N4E Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 8.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits ef fective examina- See Table 2 Sheet 6.

81.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of the forging. nized. Apprn41mately 81% of weld length was acces- the required volume as defined sible for scanning. In the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 53% of the Code was examined ef fectively Code-required volume was with at least one an;gle beam examined with at least component .

oo one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-N4F Complete volumetric exam- Hozzle configuration None. See Figure 8.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits ef fective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

B1.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination perfermed mecha-obtained. Approximately forging. Proximity of nized. Approximately 66% of 79% of the weld length Nil nozzle Ilmtts scan- the required volume as defined was accessible for scan- ning in one azimuth in the 80/W80 Edition of the ning. Approximately 44% location. Code was examined effectively of the Code-required with at least one angle team volums was examined with component.

at least one angle beam component.

1 RPVI-N5A Complete volumetric Nozzle configuration hone. See Figure 9.

B-D Nozzle-to-She!! Weld examination of the Code- limite effective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

81.30 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of time forging. nizeJ. Approximately 86% of weld lengtle was acces- the required volume as defined sible for scanning. In the 80/W80 Edition of the Approxim.stely 67% of the Code v:is examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle team examined with at least component.

one angle team component.

NitTE: A 2% volumetric limitation inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Weld Examinations is the result of interface noise at the sound beam entry at time outside vessel surf ace.

Teble 1 -

COMPONElff AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) t SYSTDt: Reactor vessel (Cont'd)  ;

Class Category Identification of ,

~

ltes No. Ex wination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks  ?

I RrVI-N55 Complete volumetric exae- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 9.

M Nozzle-to-Shell Weld inetton of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table ?, Sheet 6.

a;3.10 required volume taas not tion of the full nozzle Exastnation performed mecha-obtained. 100Z of the forging. nized. Approsteately 86% of weld length was acces- the required volume es defined sible for scanning. -

in the 80/W80 Edition of the-Approx!aately 671 of the Code was etaetned effectively.

Code-required volume was emasteed witte at least one angle beam component.

I trVI-N4A Complete volumetric exae- Nostle configuration None. See Figure 10.

B-D m zzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective exaetna- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

53.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed manu- '

obtained. 100% of the forging. ally. Approximately 90% of weld length was acces- the required volume as defined sible for scanaing. in the 80/W80 Edition of the Approxleately 83% of the Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle heae examined with at least component.

p one angle bene component.

c 1 RrVI-N6B Complete volumetric exas- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 10.

B-D bzzle-to-st. ell Weld ination of the code- lietts effective emanina- See Table 2, Sheet 6.

83.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed e,anu-obtained. 100Z of the forging. ally. Approximately 901 of weld length was acces- the required volume as defined sible for scanntag. In the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 83% of the Code was exastned effectively Code-requireJ volume was with at least ene angle beam t examined with at least component. '

one angle beam component. -

1 RrVI-NF Complete volumetric exae- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 11.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Wald ination of the Code- limits effective examina- , see Table 2, sheet 6.  !

B3.10 required volume was not .tlan of the full nozzle Esaetnation performed manu-obtained. 100% of the furging. ally. Approximately 93% of weld length was acces- the required volume as detined sible for scanning, in the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 77% of the Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam exaetned with at least component.

one angle beas component.

NOTE: A 21 volumetric limitation inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Weld Examinations is the result. of interface noise at the sound beme entry at the outside vessel surface. ,

_r.--, .v, . . - _ - ., -- _. - - - . , ._ . _ .

() , ,

-~

(,_)

,, (,/

, ,\

t; (_). ,t--) (/ (-) J t_) (/

1htble 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) .

SYSTEM: Reactor Vessel (Cont'd)

Class Category Identification of Ites No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks 1 RPVL-NSA Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle confleuration None. See Figure 12.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits ef fective examina- See, Table 2, Sheet 7.

51.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle , Examination performed manu-obtained. 100% of the forging. ally. Approximately 92% of weld length was acces- the required volume 'as defined sible for scanning. In the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 87% of the Code was examined ef fectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at_least compcnent .

one angle beam component.

1 RFVl-N85 Complete volumetric exaa- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 12.

5-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2, Sheet 7.

31.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Exaatnation performed manu-obtained. 100% of the forging. ally. Approximately 92% of weld length was acces- the required volume es defined sible for scanning. In the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 87% of the Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at least component .

[j one angle beam component.

1 Rrvl-N9 Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 12.

B-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2 Sheet 7.

83.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed manu-obtained. 100% of the forging. ally. Approximately 92% of weld length was acces- ,

the required volume as defined sthle for scanning. In the 20/WS) Edition of the Approximately 87% of the Coda was examined effectively Code-required volume was utth at least one angle beam examined with at least com ponent .

one angle beam component.

, I R PVI-N17A Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 13.

5-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2. Sheet 7.

Bl.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of the forging. nized. Approximately 89% of weld length waa acces- the required volume as defined stble for scanning. In the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 64% of the Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one an8 e1 beam exactned with at least com ponent .

one angle beam component.

NOTE: A 2% volumetric limitation inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Weld Examinations is the result of interface noise at the sound beam entry at the outside vessel surface.

O O O O O O' O O O O- O Table 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D)

SY" TEM: Reactor Vessel (Cont'd)

Class Category Identification of Item No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks 1 RrVI-N178 Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 13.

8-D m zzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2. Sheet 7.

83.1C required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of the forging, nized. Approximately 89% of

. weld length was acces- the required volume as defined sible for scanning.

in the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 64% of the Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at least component.

one angle beam component.

1 RrV1-N17C Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 13.

8-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2 Sheet 7.

83.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of the forging. nized. Approximately 89% of weld length was acces- the required volume as defined sthie for scanning. in the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 64% of the Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at least component.

$ one angle beam component.

1 RPV1-N17D Complete volumetric exam- Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 13.

8-D Nozzle-to-Shell Weld ination of the Code- limits effective examina- See Table 2. Sheet 7.

81.10 required volume was not tion of the full nozzle Examination performed mecha-obtained. 100% of the forging. ntzed. Approximately 89% of weld length was acces- .

the required volume as defined sible for scanning. In the 80/W80 Edition of the Approximately 64% of the Code was examined effectively Code-required volume was with at least one angle beam examined with at least component.

one angle beam component.

I RPVI-NIA Complete volumetric Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 5.

8-D Instde Radius Section examination of the inside interferes with scanning See Table 2 Sheet 5.

51.20 radius section was not on the nozzle boss and Examination performed obtained. Approximately prohibits a meaningful mechanized.

86% of the required interrogatton of the volume was effectively bore portion of the examined. Inside radius section.

1 RPV1-NIB Complete volumetric Nozzle configuration None. See Figure 5.

8-D Inside Radius Section examination of the inside interferes with scanning See Table 2, Seet 5.

81.20 radius section was not on the nozzle boss and Examination performed obtained. Approximately prohibits a meaningful mechanized.

86% of the require.1 interrogation of the volume was effectively bore portion of the examined. Inside radius section.

NOTE: A 2% volumetric limitation inherent to the Reactor Pressure Vessel Weld Examinations is the result of interface notse at the sound beam entry at the outstJe vessel surface.

O O O _O _O.. ..O.. ..O . O._. O O. ,

0 Tzble 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) .

SYSTEN: Reactor Vessel (Cont'd)

Class Category Identiftcatton of j tten No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks 1 RPVI-N4C Complete volumetric Proximity of Nil nozzles Mone. See Figure 8.

B-D Inside Radius Section examination of the inside limits scanning. See Table 2. Sheet 6.

33.20 radius section was not Examination performed obtained. Approximately mechantred.

4 89% of the required volume was effectively examined.

t i 1 RPVI-N4F Cnsplete volumetric Proximity of Mll nozzles None. See Figure 8.

B-D inside Radius Section examination of the inside limits scanning. See Table 2. Sheet 6.

i Bl.20 radius section was not Examination performed obtained. Approximately mechanized.

89% of the required volume was effectively .

examined.

i 1 RPV!-THDF , Complete volumetric exam- Due to an abrupt transi- None. Examination was performed l B-C-1 Reactor Vessel Flange ination coverage of the tion at the seal surface manually.

$ B6.40 1.igaments flange ligament area was cladding, scanning for I not obtained. complete coverage of the

! N ligament area cannot be i

performed.

1 i i RPV-WSB(1-8) Complete surface enant- Complete examination None. Stabilizer brackets 1, 5, 6, l R-il Reactor Vessel Stahtlizer nation coverage of the coverage is not possible 7, and 8 received surface 1 88.10 Brackets stabtlizer attachment for brackets 1, 5, 6, 7, examination coverage on welds was not obtained. and 8 due to interference three of the four sides.

from permanent insulation Examination was performed manually.

support brackets, I

J i

1 1

i d

a l.

O O 0 O O O O~ - OL 'O ~ U j.;

Tc.ble 1 COMPONENI AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) .

SYSTot: Main Steam Class Category Identification of Item No. Examination Area Liettation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks 1 1-AR-3D8A-0504-8 Complete surface exant- A permanent type support None. None.

B-J Pipe-to-Elbow nation coverage was not is covering the examina-39.11 obtained from 11-3/4 tion area for 2 inches inches to 1 inch L. of the 12-3/4 inches of weld length.

N t.a NOTE: "L" denotes the seasurement from the reference zero point established to sup indicatlan/11mitation locations either around the circumference and/or along the length of a weld.

O O O O O O O O O O U Table 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) ,

SYSTDt: Feedwater Class Category Identification of iten No. Examination Area L!attation Basis for Relief Alternate Exaatnations Remarks I l-AE-24DLA-035-4 Complete volumetric cow- Due to a weld buildup None. Complete surface examination 5-J Pipe-to-Valve verage was not obtained area, scanning is limited coverage was obtained in the 89.11 froe 53-1/2 inches to for 16-3/4 inches of the area of the volumetric 70-1/4 inches L. 76-1/2 inches of weld limitation.

length.

I l-AE-24DLA-036-6 Complete surface exaal- Due to a su:* port inter- None. Full volumetric examina-5-J Pipe-to-Elbow nation coverage was not ference, surface exastna- tion coverage was obtained 89.11 obtained from 28 inches tion is restricted for in the ares of the surface to 42 inches L. 14 inches of the 76 inches limitation.

of weld length.

N O

IsuTE: "L" denotes the measurement from the reference zero point estabitaheJ to sup indication /Itattation locations either around the circumference and/or along time length of a weld.

Tchle 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIC~S (CONT'D)

SYSTDf: Reactos tecirculat ton class Category 1.teattitcattaa of trew No. Emanisation Area Limitation Easts for Relief Alternate Exaatnations Rema rk s 1 1-RS-2SVCA-011-31D Surface and volumetric A permanent edilp None. . This limitation will restrict B-J I.angtteitaat Seam coverage was not restraint (anchor frame) 7-1/2 inches of subsequent 39.12 obtalmed from 4-l/2 covers 15-1/2 taches of ISI-required esse area based taches to 20 taches L. Lt.e 41-1f) taches of weld on selection of the 12-tach length. segment which latersects the circumferential weld.

I l-BS-2SvCA-Oll-515 Complete volumetric The scan area configura- None. Complete surface examination 5-J Lnegttedteal Seam coverage was not tion (tee taper) pre- coverage was obtalped.

59.12 obtalmeJ from o to clades e nalmation for 2 taches L. 2 taches of the 20-5/16 -

taches of weld length.

I l-RS-28vCA-011-etR Serface amt valueetric A permanent pipe None. This limitation is outside of E-J longttedtmal Seas coverage was not restraint covers 1(i laches the 12-inch segment of longitu-39.12 obtalmed free 20 taches of the 55-7/16 taches of dinal weld required to be exam-to 36 taches L. weld length. Ined during ISI.

I 1-RS-2SvCA-Ott-712 Sarface and volumetric A permanent pipe None. This limitation will restrict y 3-J Longitedtaat Seas coverage was not restratat covers IS taches 8 inches of subsequent ISI-ta 39.12 obtained from 4 taches of the 74-3/4 taches of required exam area based on to 22 taches L. we1J 1ength, selection of the 12-inch seg-ment of longitudtaat seas which intersects the circumferential weld.

1 1-85-28YC&-Oll-7131 Serf ace and volumetric tranch connections to None. This limitattoa is outside of 5-J teagttaJimal Seas coverage was not the esamtmattaa area the 12-inch segment of longitu-39.17 obtataed from 19 taches preclude eustaattue for dinal weld requiring subsequent to 21 taches L. 2 f act.es of the 21 taches exantaatton 151.

of weld length.

I 1-ES-23YC&-011-8tri Sarface and volumetric Branch cuanections la None. This itettattoa is outside of B-J tmagtted. mal Seas coverage was not the enateattaa area the 12-inch segment of tongitu-39.12 obtataed free 19 taches preeleJe enataatton for dinal weld requiring seibsequent to 21 taches I 2 inches of the 21 Inches exantaattaa 151.

j of we1J length.

1 I-85-28vCA-Cll-7 TAG Surface and volumetric Eranch connections la Mone. This limitat toa is outside of S-J toegttu ttmat Seam coverage was not obtataed the enantaatton area l the 12-inch segment of longitu-39.12 from 41-7/8 f aches to preclude enstaattom of dinal weld requiring subsequent 43-5/8 taches L. 1-3/4 taches of the esamination 151.

43-5/8 taches of weld length.

RFTE: T Jemotes the w aserement from the referwace zero potat estabitsbed to map ladicattoef ttuttation locations either around the circumference i am tlar along the tength of a welJ.

t

O O O O O O O O O O O Tchle 1 COMPC" INT AND PIPI3 LIMITATIC~,S (CONT'D) ,

SYTTEM: Re. actor tectreetat taa (Cont'J)

Class Category IJentificattorn of I t ee Isa. Exaelmattoe Area Liettation Basis for Rettef Alternate Exaelmations Remarks 1 1-ES-28TCA-Oll-4IM Surface aoJ wolumetric Branch connections la leone. This Itattation is outside of 3-J 1magttadiaal Sese coverage was not obtataed the e ustaation area the 12-tach segment of longitu-31.I2 from 41-7/8 taches to preclude cuatmation of disal weld requiring subsequent 41-5/8 taches t 1-3/4 taches of t'ae exantaatton ISI.

43-5/8 taches of weld leegth.

1 1-RS-287CA-011-98C2 Tolueetric coverage Due to'the branch connec- A Code-required 60* exae- Complete surface enantsattne 5-J eraach Commeettoe estag 0* welJ and 45* tion configurattoa, a 0* ination uns performed coverage was obtained.

39.30 transverse scans was not we1J amt 45T weld exam- from the esta run of pipe.

obtataed. taattom cannot be obtataeJ.

I 1-as-237CA-011-9BC1 Volumetric coverage Due to the branch connec- A Code-required 60* exam- Complete surface eueination a-J Sranch t%===ction estas 0* weld and 45* tion configuratton, a 0* taattoe was performed coverage was obtalw J.

39.30 transverse scan was not we1J aos 45T weld eus- from the mate run of pipe.

obtstaed. taattoe canaat be obtataed.

I l-ES-4TCA-011-1 tess than one-third of Due to branch connection 15one. Complete surface exantaatton

$ S-J Stanch Comeecttoe- the Code-regetred cover- configurattoa, a complete coverage was obtained. 100Z 39.11 to-ptpe age of the lower one- scan cannot be perfarmed of the length of the weld was third we14 volmee could to provide full coverage. accessible for scanatng.

mot be obtataed.

I I-88-4TCA-411-2 Less than one-fourth of Due to the flange com- flone. Complete surface eueinat tun 5-J Fire-to-Flaege the CoJe-regelred cover- (tgerattoa, a complete coverage was obtained. 100%

E9.11 age of the lower one- scas cammet be performed of the length of the we!J was third weld volume com13 to provide felt coverage. accessible for scanning.

not be obtateed. .

I 1-EB-287CA-012-5 Surface exaetaattom A permament pipe support 18one. Volumetric coverage of the a-J pipe-to-Ftpe coverage could est be laterference precludes lower one-third seld volume s9.11 obtateed from 18-1/2 surface exaetaattom for was obtained to the area of taches to 67-5/!= laches 48-13/16 taches of the the surface examinattom L. 87-3/16 taches of weld 11ettattom.

j leegth.

I 1-ES-28VCA-012-7tD1 Volumetric coverage tranch cosaection toter- hooe. Complete surface enantnattes 5-J toegttadinal seas com1J act be obtataed ference tietts scasetag coverage was obtained. This 89.12 free 18-1/2 taches to for 2 f actws of the tiettation is outside of the 20-1/2 taches L. 21 taches of weld length. 12-inch segment of longitudi-

, nal weld requiring subsequent exaatnatton 151.

BKYTE: *I.* deootes the measurement from the reference zero potet established to anp ladication/Itattation locations either around the circueference +

aeffer along the length of a weld.

i

\

Tchle 1 COMPONENT AND PIPINC LIMITATIONS (COVr'D)

• l

( SYSTDf: Reactor tectremlattom (Cont'd)

Class Cat'egory IJentifIcatton of -

Item Sh. Examination Area Liattation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinattons Remarks 1 1-Es-2RVCA412-71DO Volumetric coverage Branch connection later- Isome . Complete surface examination e-J toegitmJimal Seam could not be obtataed ference Itatte scaantag coverage was obtained. This 39.12 from 41-1/2 taches to for 3 taches of the limitation is outstJe of the 1 44-l/2 taches L. 44-1/2 inches of weld 12-tach segment of longitudi-l length. mal weld requiring subsequent I

examinattom ISI.

I 1-85-28vCA-012-81.00 Volumetric coverage Branch connection inter- None. Complete surface examination B-J Lnagttedtmal Seam coulJ aat be obtataed ference limits scanalog coverage was obtained. This 89.12 from 41-1/2 inches to for 3 taches of the limitattoa is outside of the l 44-1/2 inches L. 44-1/2 inches of weld 12-inch segment of longitudi-l 1ength. nal weld requiring subse<tuent examinattoa 151.

I l-RS-23YCA-012-8tEl Volumetric coverage Branch connection inter- None. Complete surface examination S-J 14agttadinal Seam could met be obtained ference limits scanning coverage was obtained. Thig 89.12 from 20 inches to for 3-1/2 taches of the limitation is outside of the 23-l/2 taches L. 23-1/2 taches of weld 12-tach segment of longitudt-1ength. aal weld requiring subsequent i

examination ISI.

1 n l 1 1-BS-28vCA-O!2-99C2 Volumetric coverage Due to the branch connec- A Code-requircJ 60* exam- Complete surface esamination 5-J aranch Comaection using 0* weld and 45* tion weld configuration, ination was performed coverage was obtained.

59.M transverse scans was not 0* veld and 45T weld from the mata run of pipe.

j obtained. examination cannot be obtained. .

l t I-BS-28vCA-012-9BC3 volumetric coverage Due to the branch connec- A Code-required 60* exam- Complete surface examination

. B-J Branch Connection using 0* weld and 45' tion veld conftguration, ination uns performed coverage was obtained.

l B9.30 transverse scans v.as not O' weld aml 45T weld from the m.ita run of pipe.

i obtained. examtmation cannat In-l obtained.

l t 1-85-4VCA-012-1 Less than one-fourth of Due to the branch connec- None. Complete surface examination S-J Branch N actioe- the Code-required cover- tion configuration, a com- coverage was obtained. 100%

39.11 to-Ftpe age of the lower one- plete scan cannot be per- of the length of the weld was third weld volume coulJ formed to provide full accessible for scanning.

not be obtataed. coverage.

I 1-sa-28vCA-013-IsC1 Volumetric coverage using Due to the branch con- A Code-required 45* exam- Complete surface examination l

s-J sranch Connection 0* weld and 45* trans- section weld configura- Ination was performed coverage weis obtained.

I 89.M verse scans was not Eton, a 0* weld amt 457 from the main run of pipe.

obtained. weld examination cannot be obtained.

l IRJTE: ~17 denotes time measurement from the reference sero potat established to map indication /Itattation Incations either around the circumference and/or along the length of a welJ.

l

~

O O O O O O O O O O O Trble 1

• COMPONE!Tr AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) ,

STSTEM: Reactor Rectremiation (Cont'd)

Class Category Identti!catton of Ites No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks I l-BS-2ETCA-OI 3-4 BC L Volumetric coverage with Due to the branch connec- A Code-required 45' exam- Complete surf ace examination B-J Branch Connection the 45* transverse scan tion weld configuratton, ination was performed coverage was obtained.

59.30 was not obtained. a 45 transverse weld from the main run of pipe.

examination cannot be obtained.

I 1-85-4VCA-413-1 Less than one-fourth of Due to the branch connec- None. Complete surface exaetnation B-J Branch Connection- the Code-required cover- tion configuration, a coverage was obtained. 100Z 89.11 to-Ftpe age of the lower one- complete scan cannot be of the length of the weld was third weld volume could performed to provide full accessthie for scanning.

not be obtained, coverage.

I l-88-12VCA-0148-2 Complete volumetric Due to the weld crown con- None. Complete surface examination B-J Pipe-to-Pipe coverage could not be figuration, complete volu- coverage was obtained.

89.11 obtained from 27-1/2 metric coverage for 6-1/2 Inches to 34 inches L. Inches of the 40 inches of total we1J length cannot be obtained.

I l-BS-4VCA-014-1 Less ttsan one-third of Due to the branch connec- None. Complete surface examination y B-J Braach Connection- the Code-required cover- tion configurattoo, a coverage was obtained. 100Z 89.11 to-Cap age of the lower one- complete scan cannot be of the length of the weld was third weld volume could performed to provide full accessible for scanning.

not be obtained. coverage.

I l-BS-2 DEA-192A-IPSI Complete surface exam- This integral attachment None. None.

B-K-1 Pipe Support ination could not be could not be examined on 810.10 obtained. the upstream side due to interference from an expansion joint.

I l-88-2CCA-204-3 Complete surface exam- Due to a permanent pipe None. None.

5-1 Fipe-to-Tee ination coverage could support, complete surface 89.21 not be obtained from exaetnation caverage for 2 taches to 6 inches L. 4 inches of the 7-9/16 inches of weld length cannot le obtained.

NOTE: "L" denotes the measurement f rom the reference zero putnt established to nup indication /ttattation locations either arounit the circumference and/or along the length of a weld. .

Table 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) .

SYSTEM: Residual Neat Removal Class Category Identification of ,

Iten No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks 1 1-b M DSA-003-21 Complete valueecric Due to the weld intat A 0* weld and 45T weld Complete surface examination S-J Valve-to-Flana,e coverage could not be configuration, the 45* examination was performed. coverage was obtainsd.

39.11 obtained. , exaetnation could not be performed.

1 1-BC-2L.* 7 16 Cneplete valueetric A branch connection None. Complete surface exantnation S-J ripe-to- W w coverage could not be limits scanning for coverage was obtained.

59.11 obtained 30-1/2 inches 4 inches of the 63-3/4 to 34-1/2 inches L. inches of total weld length.

I 1-BC-12DLA-071-4 Complete volumetric A branch connection None. Complete surface examination 8-J Valve-to-Pipe coverage could not be limits scanning for coverage was obtained.

B9.11 obtained 19 inches to 3 inches of the 41-7/8 22 inches L. inches of total weld length, t 1-8C-12CCA-115-5 Less than one-third of Due to the weld joint None. Complete surface exaeInstion B-J Pipe-to-Reducing Tee the Code-required cover- configuration, a complete coverage was obtained. 100%

59.11 age of the lower one- scan cannot be performed of the length of the weld was e third volume coverage to provide full coverage. accessible for scanning.

could not be obtained.

I 1-BC-2DRA-120-3 Complete surface exam- A permanent pipe None. This examination area is B-J Pipe-to-Valve ination coverage could restraint covers the exempt based on the 80/W81 9.21 not be obtained from examination area for Edition of the Code.

2 inches to 5-1/2 inches 3-1/2 inches of the L. 6-1/2 inches of total weld length.

I l-8C-2 dea-120-5 Surface exaetnation A permanent pipe None. This examination area is B-J Pipe-to-Reducer coverage,could not be restraint covers the exempt based on the 80/W81 59.21 obtained, examination area pre- Edition of the Code.

cluding surface exami-nation.

I 1-BC-2DBA-121-3 Complete surface examina- A permanent pipe None. This examination area is 8-J Valve-to-Pipe tion coverage could not restraint covers 2 inches exempt based on the 80/W31 39.21 he obtained from 1-1/2 of the approximately Edition of the Code.

inches to 3-1/2 inches L. 6-1/2 inches of total weld length.

I 1-BC-2DRA-121-4 Complete surface examina- A permanent pipe None. This examination area is 8-J Pipe-to-Reducer tion coverage could not restraint covers 2 inches exempt based .on the 80/W81 89.21 be obtained from 1-1/2 of the approstaately Edition of the Code.

inches to 3-1/2 inches L. 6-1/2 inches of total weld hagth.

NOTE: "L* denotes the measurement from the reference zero point established to map indication / limitation locations either around the circumference anJ/or along the length of a weld.

Table 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D)

SYSTEM: Reactor Water Clean Up Class Category Identtftcation of Item No. Examination Area 1, imitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks I l-BC-4DBA-Oll-01 Less that one-half of Due to the branch con- None. Complete surface examination 8-J Weldolet-to-Pipe the Code-required cover- nection configuration, coverage was obtained. 100%

89.11 age of the lower one- a complete scan cannot of the length of the weld was third examination volume be performed to provide accessible for scanning.

was not obtained. full coverage.

I l-BC-4CCA-012-1 tess than one-third of Due to the branch con- None. Complete surface examination B-J Weldotet-to-Pipe the Code-required cover- nection configuration, coverage was obtained. I00%

R9.11 age of the lower one- a complete scan cannot of the length of the weld was

' third examination volume be performed to provide accessible for scanning.

was not obtained. full coverage.

sa o

NOTE: "L" denotes the measurement from the reference zero point established to m p indication /11mitation locations either around the circumference anJ/or along the length of a weld.

Table 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D) .

SYSTEM: RHR Heat Exchanger Class

, category Identificatton of ,

Item No. Examination Area Limitation Basis for Relief Alternate Examinations Remarks 2 RHX1R2 Complete volumetric Due to the configuration None. None.

C-8 RtR Heat Exchanger 'A' examination coverage of of the M4 nozzle, com-C2.20 the N4 nozzle inner plate inner radius cover-radius was not obtained. age cannot be obtained from 4 inches to 33-13/16 inches L and 41-13/16 inches to 71-5/8 inches L.

2 RHXIR2 Complete volumetric Due'to the configuration None. None.

C-8 RHR Heat Exchanger '8' examination coverage of of the N4 nozzle, com-C2.20 the N4 nozzle inner plate inner radius cover-radius was not obtained. age cannot be obtained from 4 inches to a 33-13/16 inches L and l 41-11/16 inches to 71-5/8 inches L.

{ L' i

i

(

t i

i I

NOTE: "L" denotes the measurement from the reference zero point established to nip indication / limitation locations either around the circumference and/or along the length of a weld.

Tebla 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'D)

• SYTfDE: Core Spray Pumps Class Category Identification of Ites No. Euantnation Area Liettation Basis for Relief Alternate EtaeInstions Remarks 2 CSP-W1 Surface emanination This exaetaation area is None. None.

C-C Core Spray Pump 'A' coverage was not made inaccessible due to C6.10 obtained. the pump lower section being within a concrete pump pedestal.

2 CSP-W2 Complete surface exam- Only 22 Inches of the None. None.

C-C Core Spray Pump 'A' ination coverage was not weld length is accessible C6.lO obtaineJ. for exaetnation. The balance of the examina-tion area is esde inacces-sible by the concrete pump pedestal.

2 CSP-W5 Surface emanination Exastnation area is made None. This examination will be C-C Core Spray Pump 'A' coverage was not inaccessible by flange performed when the flange is C6.10 obtained. bolts. disassembled.

2 CSP-W1 Surface enastnation This exantastion area is None. None.

C-C Core Spray Pump 'B' coverage was eat made inaccessible due to y C6.10 obtained. the pump lower section being within a concrete pump pedestal.

2 CSP-W2 Complete surface exam- Only 22 inches of the Mone. None.

C-C Core Spray Pump 'B' inaf ton coverage was not veld length to accessible C6.10 obtained. for exantnation. The balance of the examina-tion area is esde inacces-sible by the concrete pump pedestal.

2 CSP-W5 Surface exaetnation Exastmation area is esde None. This exantnation will be C-C Core Spray Pump 'B' coverage was not inaccessible by flange performed when the flange is C6.10 obtained. bolts. disassembled.

2 CSP-W1 Surface exaetnation This examination area is None. None.

C-C Core Spray Pump 'C' coverage was not made inaccessible due to C6.10 obtat W . the pump lower section being within a concrete pump pedestal.

NOTE: *L" denotes the measurement from the reference raro point established to map Indication /11mitation locations either around the circumference and/or along the length of a weld.

• O U U U O U U U U t> j '

Tcble 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (C0h'r'D) .

SYSTet: Core Spray Pumps (Cant'd)

Class Category IJenttitcatton of Ites No. Examination Area Limitation Bastis for Relief Alternate Esaminations Remarks 2 CSP-W2 Complete surf ace esam- Only 22 inches of the None. None.

C-C Core Spray Pump 'C' ination coverage was not weld length is accessible C6.10 obtained. for cumination. The balance of the esamination area is made inaccessible by the concrete pump pedestal.

2 CSP-Ut Serface esamination This esamination area is None. None.

C-C Core Spray Pump 'D' coverage was not made inaccessible due to C6.10 obtained. the pump lower section being within a concrete pump pedestal.

2 CSP-412 Complete surface exam- Only 21 inches of the Mane. None.

C-C Core Spray Pump 'D' ination coverage was not veld length is accessible C6.10 obtained. for esamination. The balance of the esamination area is made inaccessible by the concrete pump y pedestal.

2 CSP-US Surface esamination Eaaminat tan area is made None. This esamination will be C-C Core Spray Pump 'D' coverage was not inaccessible by flange performed when the flange is C6.10 obtained. bolts. disassembled.

NOTE: Y denotes the measurement from the reference zero point established to amp indication /Ilmitattom locatinos either around the circumference and/or along the length of a weld.

U U U U U U U U U U {

Tcb12 1 COMPONENT AND FIPINC LIMITATIONS (CONT'C) .

SYST9t: Resideal Heat Re mval Pumps Class Categary IdentifIcattoe of Ites No. Euninat toe Area Limitation Easts for Rettef Alternate Examtmattoms Rema rk s 2 RitP-W1 Serface examinattaa This exantaattoa area is t3ome. None.

C-C Resideal Heat Removal coverage was not made lasccessible due to C4.10 resp 'A' obtataed. the pump tower section being within a concrete pump pedestal.

2 atItP-W2 Complete surf ace exae- Only 10 taches of the None. bne .

C-C Resideal Heat Reenval laatton coverage was not we1J 1ength is accessible C6.10 p= amp 'A' obtataed. for exaalaatles. The balance of the exaatmation area is asJe inaccessible .

by the concrete psmp pedestal.

2 RHP-W1 Surface exaatnation This esaetaatton area is None. None.

C-C RestJeal Beat Removal coverage was not made taaccessible due to C6.lO Peep 's' obtalmeJ. the peep lower secttoe belag withia a concrete pump pedestat.

$ 2 MP-U2 Complete surface exam- Only 11-1/2 taches of the hae . None.

C-C RestJeal IIeat Removat laatton coverage was not veld length is accessible C6.10 Pasp 's' obtataed. for eumination. The balance of the examinattaa area is anJe taaccessible by the concrete pump pedesta1. ,

2 RMP-U) Complete surface eus- Surface eustaattaa Mone. None.

C-C Restdeal Heat Re m val taatton coverace was not coverage is not obtained C6.10 Fump 's' obtataed. 13 taches to 80-l/8 laches L due ta the concrete pump pedestal encasement.

2 RHP-W1 Surface examtmatten This custaattoe area is bee . None.

C-C Res!Jeal 15 eat Removal coverage was not made laaccessible due to C6.10 rump 'C' obtatmeJ. the pump lower section l betag withle a concrete pump pedestat.

ETTE: T denotes the messarement from the reference zero potat established to nip ladicat toe /ttattation locat toes either around tt.e circumference samt/or along the tength of a weld.

O O O O O O O O O O O Tnble 1 COMPONENT AND PIPING LIMITATIONS (CONT'C) l STSrDt: RestJa.1 15 eat teorval rumps (Cont'd)

Class Category IJeatIfIcatIon of item No. Examtmatice Area Llattattae Easts for Relief Alternate Esaminattens Remarlts 2 R2P-tr2 Complete surface esam- caly % taches of the h=a . leone.

C-C RestJaat Beat Remowat taattom coverage eras not we1J Iength is accessible C6.10 rway *C' obtalmeJ. for en ataatten. The balance of the examtmattee area is made taaccessible by the concrete pump pedestal.

2 REP-4il Serface exaetaatton This eaaatmattaa area is hee . None.

C-C RestJ ul 15 eat Removal coverage was not made lanccessible due to C6.10 Pump 'D' obtataed. the pump tower section betag within a caecrete pump pedestal.

2 REP-ill Complete surface esaa- Serface esaetaattoe leone . Isome.

! C-C RestJaal IIcat Removat laat tam coverage was not coverage is eat obtataed I Ch.10 reap 'D' obtalmeJ. from 14 taches to 119 taches L due to the com-I crete pedestal encasement.

3 7 REP-id) Complete surface esaar- 5erface esamtmattom leone. Ilome.

C-C RestJeal Beat Reemvat teatten coverage was not coverage is not obtalmed Cb.10 Peep 'D' obtataeJ. from 15 taches to 80-114 taches L dee to time coe-crete peJestal encasement.

l m: T denotes the measurement from the reference rete p tat established to map latication/ttattation locations either around the ciremeference

• l an ifer alaes time lea th of a weld. ,

l

l. , _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ . - , . __ . - ___-. -- - - - - - -

f 1 i

G. .

l l

l O

9 l

l 9

l Table 2 t

REACTOR VESSEL EXAMINATION VOLUME COVERAGE

9 ,

1 i

iO f

I i

i t

!O l

9 9 .

9

v-

). .

Shut 1 Table 2 REACTOR VESSEL EXAMINATION VOLUME COVERAGE Weld Description Exas Forcent of Code Figure

) . asd.Vn14. h . _ . ensla. M use.Isasised h ..

RPVI-W3 45 80.65 1&4 Shell to Flasse 60 91.72 Circunferential Weld 0 58.00 -

45T 42.13 60r 42.15 Cumulative

• 91.72 RPV1-W4 45 49.06 1 Shell to Shell 60 92. 42 Circumfereattal Weld 0 74.71

) 45T 60r Cumulative 90.49 91.59 92.5 9 RFV1-W5 45 46.07 1 shell to shell 60 52.47 Circumferentist Wald 0 43.44

)

45T 45.42 60r 44.28 Custative 52.47 RFv1-W4 45 43.74 1 Shell to she11 60 51.51 Circumferential Weld 0 35.00

]

, 45T 44.69 l

60r 52.73 Cumulative 52.73 RPV1-W7 45 96 .3 0 2

) Shell to Shell 60 98.15 Circumferential Weld 0 77.20 45T 96.3 0 l 60T 98.15 l Cumuistive 98.15 RPV1-W8 45 77.02 2

) Lower Head To shell 60 84.15

Circumferential Wald 0 62.76 45T 89.58 60f 91.3 0 Cumulative 91.3 0

)

j RPV1-W11-1 14asitudinal Weld 45 60 M.30 98.15 1

j 0 30 Dog 0 77.78 45T  %.30 60r 98.15 Cumulaeive 98.15

)

• Cumulative Coverage is that percentage of the Code required exaalnation volume scanned with at least one angle beam.

l '

l 36 3

l

I Shnet 2 Table 2 4-REACTOR VESSEL EXAMINATION VOLUME COVERAGE (CONT'D)

Weld Description han Percent of Code Figure

~ ___ sad Vald Pen _ Angls Ys19ss..Exavined !s2_.

U RPV1-W11-2 45 96 .3 0 1 4

14nsitudinal Wald 60 97.3 5 8 150 Des 0 77.78 45T  %.30 6W 98.15 (O cumulative 98.15 RPv1-W11-3 45  %.30 1 14nsitudinal Weld 60 95.3 0 0 270 Des 0 77.78 45T 96 .3 0 "o 6W 98.15 Cumulative 98.15 R771-12-1 45 96 .3 0 1 longitudinal Weld 60 98.1 5 8 110 Des 0 90.77 45T 96.3 0 0 6W 98.15 Cumulative 98.15 .

RPVI-W12-2 45 84.26 1 14agitudinal Weld 60 80.31

! 8 230 Des 0 85.52 O .

45T 95.40 6W 97.23 Cumulative 97.23 RPV1-W12-3 45 96 .3 0 1 14agitudinal Weld 60 98.15 O 8 350 Des 0 87.87 45T 96.30 6W 98.15 Cumulative 98.15 RFV1-W13-1 45 78.93 1 0 !dagitudinal weld 60 77.73 8 35 Des 0 67.32 45T 72.79 6W 74.18 Cumulative 78.93 0, RPV1-W13-2 45 62.38 1 14nsitudinal Wald 60 63.58 8 155 Des 0 50.30 45T 59.82 6W 61.48 Cumulative 63.58 37

O

L '

• Sheet 3 Table 2 REACTOR VESSEL EXAMINATION, VOLUME COVERAGE (CONT'D)

Weld Description Exam Percent of Code Figure O and Enid Es- Ansle Vs19ss Exagiggd No.

RPV1-W13-3 45  %.30 1 Iongitudinal Weld 60 98.15

@ 275 Deg 0 77.69 45T  %.30 4g 60I 98.15 Cumulative 98.15 RPV1-W14-1 45  %.30 2 Iongitudinal Weld 60 98.15

@ 90 Deg 0 77.78 45T  %.30

O 60r 98.15 Cumulative 98.15 RPV1-W14-2 45  %.30 2 Longitudinal Weld 60 98.15

@ 210 Deg 0 77.78 0 45T  %.30 60r 98.15 Cumulative 98.15 RPV1-W14-3 45 91 . 91 2 Longitudinal Weld 60 93.6 7

O @ 330 Deg 0 74.23

- 45T 92.12 60r 93 . 80 Cumulative 93 . 80 RPVI-W15-1 45 64.31 2 L ngitudinal Weld 60 67.10 O 0 18 Deg 0 75.92 45T 79.55 60r 81.58 Cumulative 81.5 8 RPV1-W15-2 45  %.30 2

.O Longitudinal Weld 60 98.15 0 138 Deg 0 77.78 45T  %.30 60r 98.15 Cumulative 98.15

O RPv1-W15-3 45  %.30 2 Longitudinal Weld 60 98.15

@ 258 Deg 0 77.78 45T  %.30 60r 98.15 Cumulative 98.15

.O .

38

O

0. .

Sheet 4 Table 2 REACTOR VESSEL EXAMINATION VOLUME COVERAGE (CONT'D)

Weld Description Exam Percent of Code Figure Q ___ggd Weld _No. A_pgle Volume Examined No.

RPV1-W16-1 45 61.96 2 Lower Head 60 63.16 Meridional Weld 0 50.18

@ 22.5 Deg 45T 62.87 60r 64.88 0 Cumulative 64.88 RPV1-W16-2 45 59.61 2 Lower Head 60 62.69 Meridional Weld 0 50.43 0 67.5 Deg 45T 64.40 0 60r 64.40 Cumulative 64.40 RPVI-W16-3 45 62.27 2 Iower Head 60 63.46 Meridional 0 51.05

O @ 112.5 Des 45T 62.73 60r 65.18 Cumulative 65.18 RPV1-W16-4 45 62.27 2 Lower Head 60 63.46

.O Meridional Weld 0 51.05

@ 157.5 Deg 45T 62.73 60I 65.18 Cumulative 65.18 RPV1-W16-5 45 62.74 2

,9 Lower Head 60 63.94 Meridional Weld 0 51.43

@ 202.5 Deg 45T 63.64 60T 65.66 Cumulative 65.66 RPVI-W16-6 45 62.74 2 O Iower Head 60 63.94 Meridional Weld 0 51.43

@ 247.5 Deg 45T 63.64 60I 65.66 Cumulative 65.66 O RPV1-W16-7 45 62.74 2 Lower Head 60 63.94 Meridional Weld 0 51.43

@ 292.5 Deg 45T 63.64 60r 65.66 Cumulative 65.66

O 39 O

)*

• Sheet 5 Table 2 REACTOR VESSEL EXAMINATION VOLUME COVERAGE (CONT'D)

Weld Description Exam Percent of Code Figure and_ Weld No. Angle Y2]uge Examined No.

} _

RPV1-W16-8 45 62.74 2 lower Head 60 63.94 Meridional Weld 0 51.43 0 337.5 Deg 45T 63.64 .

60r 65.66

) Cumulative 65.66 RPVI-W9 45 94.46 2 Lower Head Dome 60 72.25 Circumferential Weld 0 78.98 45T  %.30 3 60r 98.15 Cumulative 98.15 RPVI-W20 45 80.0A 3 Closure Head to Flange Weld 60 88.45 0 48.34

] 45T 46.6 0 60r 47.50 Cumulative 88.45 RPV1-W22 45  %.30 NA Closure Head Dome 60 98.15 g Circumferential Weld 0 45T 77.78

%.30 60r 98.15 Cumulative 98.15 RPV1-W24A through 3 45  %.30 NA

- Closure Head 60 98.15 J Meridional Welds 0 77.78 45T  %.30 60r 98.15 Cumulative 98.15 RPV1-NIA 45 42.83 5 3 Nozzle to Shell Weld 60 55.62 0 20.14 Nozzle Inside Radius 24 & 34RL 85.72 RPVI-N1B 45 42.97 5 Nozzle to Shell Weld 60 56 .0 9 b Nozzle Inside Radius 0

24 & 34RL 17.61 85.72 RPVl-N2A.3.E.F.G.& K 45 59.45 6 Nozzle to Shell Welds 60 68.47

~

0 29.39 g Nozzle Inside Radius 18 & 23RL 100.00 l

40 L3 l

C) . .

Sheet 6 Table 2 REACTOR VESSEL EXAMINATION VOLUME COVERAGE-(CONT'D)

Weld Description Exam Percent of Code Figure L.) ___ggd _ We l d No . _ _ 43g13 Eglume _ Exggiged No.

RPV1-N2C & H 45 59.45 6 Nozzle to Shell Welds 60 68.30 0 29.39 Nozzle Inside Radius 18 & 23RL 100.00 0 59.45 6 RPV1-N2D & J 45 Nozzle to Shell Welds 60 68.37 0 29.39 Nozzle Inside Radius 18 & 23RL 100.00 RPV1-N3A.B.C.& D 45 37.03 7

()- Nozzle to Shell Welds 60 43.88 0 15.29 Nozzle Inside Radius 25RL 100.00 RPV1-N4A & E 45 43.36 8 Nozzle to Shell Welds 60 53.3 9 C) 0 23.3 8 Nozzle Inside Radius 19 & 26RL 100.00 RPVI-N4B & D 45 40.16 8 Nozzle to Shell Welds 60 48.45 0 19.12 C) Nozzle Inside Radius 19 & 26RL 100.00 RPV1-N4C & F 45 32.64 8 Nozzle to Shell Welds 60 40.18 0 17.61 Nozzle Inside Radius 19 & 26RL 88.75 O

RPV1-N5A & B 45 57.80 9 Nozzle to Shell Welds 60 66.87 0 25.97 Nozzle Inside Radius 17 & 22RL 100.00 q') RPV1-N6A & B 45 78.10 10 Nozzle to Shell Weld 60 83 . 5 8 0 37.94 Inside Radius Section 60 100.00 RPVI-N7 45 72.49 11

,, Nozzle to Shell Weld 60 77.40 id 0 64.06 Inside Radius Section 60 100.00 C3 41 C)

-0. .- sheet 7 Table 2 REACTOR VESSEL EXAMINATION VOLUME COVERAGE (CONT'D)

Weld Description Exam Percent of Code Figure

p and Weld _No. Angig 721 peg _ Examined No.

v RPY1-N8a & E 45 81.73 12 Nozzle to Shell Welds 60 87.27 0 59.54 Inside Radius Section 60 100.00

O RPVI-N9 45 81.73 12 Nozzle to Shell Weld 60 87.27 0 59.54 Inside Radius Section 60 100.00 RPVI-N17A.B.C. & D 43 56 .1 1 13

O Nozzle to Shell Weld 60 64.18 0 21.6 9 Inside Radius Section 18 & 23RL 100.00

!O

O

~O

O

!O

O 42

.O

..a w. ,a , c __d 2 - %...s - J 2A . A42_.., m.JJ< __, . . _. .2 s-..-.a __u u,A ._ a.

10 . .

f .

IO i

i i

i t

jo '

g

!O

!O Figures REACTOR VESSEL WELD ROLLOUT AND N0ZZLES

O .

4 f

10 o

O O

O

i e d n l a;

, , a ,'}4 3 $.  ?$ 4 $H@

, (

• a=

r n .: '

3 4i '

W

( g ,,

I i -

i'-

Q xl D  : >< . d s .  ;; > 1 k ,, .>

3 j w/ 7 s l

1 I @(

5 wj d n <

s%

x$

s N/

s Et h4 1

M q4.

D  ; e, 5~

% o e

s = b' (i T o L s'ri k u ( 4 4 M.

' y L. yf o D R y *'

a h nu D c, 4 w .

01 <<

oe y r c:

'1 *t V C y

=0 W

Q' l . ,

w

'4 i f a

, o

~ '

w , !o J oe

e

. e 4 g#

~ i O

fn -

ld*c] '

4 UA U

=

D 8 5 s=

> c

. C 1 c m j? e l

. '\ * .2

• i d 1 l

. v .

y (. l 5  %,

l 1

4, 7,

~

y f  ?

)

s

f e s 3 p 'l s M.!

, a.

2 i o 7 e 7,

I ns y

i N=

.$1 l

p  :, i ':'

G 6, i

s i

'i , @

N T^ .T'r n #

k'g

'4 E k he eh  % n.

1

• j 43 O

t - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4 O. .

4 E.

g y

n e.

T' N s $

b p<r s

s

. s

,i  !~s c$

$ 4 s

&~' k

?

O :1

%w 7i I

O'I  %

s s .1 3 $ i 5

)

• 0 v' ,$

} %y O 2li,

, s S Y i .

e S PJ '

N b N

E '

$. , ,. a l . e -

O y e bs. Yo$

. =

h- g j se c m'

% . O

% i9 ,,

L >

e I s'h kD Vc

.y x

MJ s* h k h*iN'$Sg

• / j, ,.

O ,

) n,

) j l (tQ Lv1 s G E ts a w i

a s l $E 2 e  %

)

i 4 I \  ;' >

T N

• 9 s  %

\ 'e

& k 's N 3 1 ,, N o

e 5 O 3 1

\

s 'J N

m

?

g

• , UN O*E s N i

o

?f./l 5:nL e .

S

• Q '

(d $ s

. k) b

, t m 5 ' h:

r />> .

3 i >

0 ,

\ i, &n Ele) .

\ /

1 t s

! \b f s

1 + y O

t 44 O

O. .

~___

O O $mh 5h8 l l 82 l 9e%a j o 5 !! $

as R4$

ia, a

=

x e x e e

.e R .z ~

o 444 y iii s E @@

L_. h $

2 3 ea c o cS a - a

=

=

% a

?e 9 i> s. .

FC ';S

~

o

}

h '

o w

ks o \ C I

\

O \ \

\ \

\ ,

O 45 O

O, .

in .

W .T

\ k O V 7 @,Ej

on2 I vC .%

O V W NO "

%" N o ,

e >

ad Q~W l $ 3 ~-

, w s s 2 C k

=

E c R$

m "

• k y '%v3 *U' O O I I I h7

-2 285 l- Eo D 3 J)E k O 9 y

- m e

/

/  %

1. ~ @

, - r o , <

O j

~ Ad

~q-Yi 'i D

u q -

3 a

. T

+c) sNI

'xN -

,s<ss y o abd ,

o I w I e i R I s

i O l v

O -

46 O

6 .

S _

W E

O /

R l

4 N -

N O I

A T D

/*

/

TAAP l

~ il L

N L O I

T O L A A L L NU S I

A AN R N T A

]

R/

Bl

' b: , T N2 O

I l

/g N 8

[

/

N- WEf L/ t a

/

I L l S H A.

l l O /

s l E A/

E

/ ?'> L A

', A I

I /

O D h f) !) # BANAN

/

N O

O I T

W T E

I EF l

l A

p Vb/E t /

E NN D., T L

O/ C, U E _

"B C ^ 5 Tl Ef B, O A f e Cb E 'AC R

. R r O S F> l l l U

u g

. lAl S' ollE R i F

aC l R A E

lfo1 i

COVN N

^

'{ 's\\

\\\b{ 9 r

O m

O 0

6 O '5 4

~

t

't t t

A e U A LE O E VD R O

S C A D

/

GE O t

/ Y

)

lB t

/R A DE HDE 4V NRI HO RC EU E T NQ N NE I R N IN O

O N

O

3. .

m aw e

s w V' k k >=

a s kk kk sw w

~ =m Q 3 N4 xx kb su

{s NT .

k SN b' om yk V DR  % $

]D hk 3

/ >E

% ~*

D*

iy ,

/

a-

/

5 4 3 \ y s

3 s

\'

p

\

s G= .;

b

%,'_ k i

<> e D,

m,k -

Wk vf x

M:  !

3 =

I l

j v I

. i l

e ,

I e j I 'c * '/

] j /

• _e / _

e D

E#E vn z e s 48 3

=.

i

\

i,

. C, 3, .

A

. FE 7

- OIV

- i c Wul L i l r u

g

- E IOi l

i _

VVE F _

T NbS

~

O'E

. TN I

/N

. Cf/

E E4 S

Dlv S

SE i

. Ob3 HO CCN

- N

_ OI T

A T

/

t s

h

. h t

- E C

A ;8 A; F

R U

S M

A E

N

, ^ -

\\7 l

c o

'5 s _

4

_ N r

/l ~-

N -

Ek S-U

/-

b AD REEHI R/A EUU NQL NlO IhV

l O. .

O

. E

% . l>

GE X - Cf F D, W O C, N E

/

W, B A

V E R IE V

O t-A 1

A R

N NU E A OL T TIOA f

wPL ~

C E Db Vw SEE

_ A SNE S/F O X OF RE4 CD N S

N N O O I

I T T O A A T

/ g 2 T

/ ~

l

/ - X 1 h

/ X- /

L b F L _

L (

A(

I B C C E 8 _

D 4 4 A e r

O RNN A F R u g

U -'

i S B 4 F R

E A

N

^

O \ \ l l

{ -

O

" ' 6( N 5 y 1-

\ \

)

y l ~ n E O D

+

EE RS1 H EuA/

lUU NbLQ NAOE l RVt/

O 8

O

! i .!

.! .lli\i l i

i, 6 ,'  ;.

ll  ;' l ! iI' i ,< (

(

(,

j c

t,

,41,

(

E y'I g Us iL

. yO Vy y

o f, Trf f U5 fy N go O ?g c I

aS T

A T

rN l

l A/

L E

C A

F 5 -

R U

S R O 7, 9 A

E 9 N e r

u g

i F

^

'*. , i

?

fc _

'O 0 ~

6 -

5 4

\ '

~

(

s D _

/

J_

m g

g

,f g

yp yq j

g g, S E

NIE E *U' Nl '

N I 'V us

,lilI il l .

1I!!i.

O .

N O

I T

O G 1 s 1

A

/

L E

C A

f R

x O U S

N R

A E C N

[

O B

c O

A W Q E

s E 0 1

f D, e r

O C, u y g A i F

E 1

A E F OUE L 4 1 L eA OZ

- U NVZ O

O oo b l Ib O

'5 l V TEN 4 b CN E/

Ah

< 06 RE SU8 bJ RIR SD(

EU SE4

- NQ OD l Oo NE i O p

?A CCN N

C O

o

+

~

O _

U O

\

O .

N O O

/

T TA

/

1 A

/

L e4' O E C

A F _

R _

U _

S R

O A E

N B  ; A C '

c\ \\ \\ .

9 O (

k -

• O 5

4 1 1

e r

u O g C ~

,E i

F b

E f

D, O E 1 C, h F B, SU UL OA

/O bV A

WE 1 RD E EA

/UE O RR VLL EU I

O7 Nf  ? NV Z NM ODO I

/

TEN CN F/T f O SEN S DE SE V OD7 RO C CN O

0 O

l l 1 1 l1,llllll 111 11

O. .

1T O

W E

I E

V f E S DD ,L NEC O ON.Z I

TF/ B,OZ N CEA EDE N O S E19 T

I SDhN SOU A

T

/

OCL(

RFO8 C 0VN I

O s I,

L E

C A

F H

u S

O R A .

E N

1B pt '

2 1

e r

u O '

' y i g

s \ .f F

C -

O '0 6

'O

'5 4

3

_/

f{ y v D ~

O _

g E

1E A

S UU I l DD t A

Rb l O RR I EU NQ NE

/R O _

y _

O -

,_+ -,.s>

l0. .

l t

c G

- O h4 u~

'O $$

s

> Wi~

e c "wY ecs A

2 kbN es~

q UCD O y b

v k

3 4

'>q go

!O Q V h to n

C

'g 10

,- 1- l4 y-

, /

O 1 5 10 @

D

~

E 10 3 E

=

4 O

55 O

_