ML20135H349

Forwards Request for Addl Info Re 850424 App R Alternate Shutdown Capability Rept.Response Requested within 45 Days of Ltr Date

ML20135H349
Person / Time
Site:	Brunswick
Issue date:	09/13/1985
From:	Vassallo D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Utley E CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 8509230077
Download: ML20135H349 (3)

Text

r a_ ,

w September 13, 1985 Docket Nos. 50-325/324 DISTRIBUTION 930HeTTIlei NRC PDR"' ~

Local PDR ORB #2 Reading Mr. E. E. Utley .

HThompson Senior Executive Vice President OELD Power Supply and Engineering & Construction SNorris Carolina Power & Light Company MGrotenhuis Post Office Box 1551 ELJordan Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 JPartlow BGrimes

Dear Mr. Utley:

ACRS(10)

Gray File

SUBJECT:

REVIEW 0F APPENDIX R V8enaroya

, RFerguson (5)

Re: Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2 By letter dated April 24, 1984, as supplemented on December 21, 1984, you i submitted an alternate shutdown capability report. Our review of that report is nearing completion. On August 6 and 7, 1985, the NRC staff conducted conference calls with your staff regarding the certain areas of the report. Your staff provided clarifications of that report and additional information to suppler'ent our review which should be reflected in a supplement to that report. On August 27, 1985 a meeting was held at the site to further help resolve the questions regarding the staff requirements and to lock at the areas in question. The specific information required is identified in the enclosure to this letter.

We request that you respond to this Request for Additional Information within 45 days from the date of the letter.

~

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements of this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is.not required under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely.

Original signed by/.

Domenic B. Vassallo, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #2 Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/ enclosure:

See next page_ $

! DL:0k8#2 DL:0RBf DE:CEBN D: RB#2 SN r s:ajs' MGrotenhuis V8enaroya DVassallo 09/II/85 09/gj/85 09/lL/85 09//3/85 l'

$bb4 Pm I

k. _ _ . . _b ._

Mr. E. E. Utley Carolina Power & Light Company Brunswick Steam Electric Plant; Units 1 and 2 cc:

Richard E. Jones, Esquire J. Nelson Grace Carolina Power & Light Company Regional Administrator 336 Fayetteville Street Region II Office t

< Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street Suite 3100 George F. Trowbridge, Esquire Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Shaw, Pittman, Pctts and Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. W. Dayne H. Brown, Chief Washington, D. C. 20036 Radiation Protection Branch Division of Facility Services Mr. Charles R. Dietz Department of Human Resources Plant Manager Post Office Box 12200

, Post Office Box 458 Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 4 -

Southport, North Carolina 28461 Mr. Franky Thomas, Chairman Board of Commissioners Post Office Box 249 Bolivia, North Carolina 28422 Mrs. Chrys Baggett

' State Clearinahouse Budget and Management 116 West Jones Street

. Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Star Route 1 Post Office Box 208 Southport, North Carolina 28461

/~

l l .'

+

1

+ a'- ' - - - -

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION APPENDIX R BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 The areas of concern and the specific information requests for each are as follows:

1. Separation of redundant functions, the sprinkler system, fire barriers and plume impingement shields in fire area DG-1.

a) Provide photographs of the area.

b) Provide drawings of the sprinkler system showing sprinkler head locations and heat collectors.

c) Provide a characterization of the separation of functions in fire area DG-1.

d) Provide additional information concerning the feasibility study for providing necessary modifications (reference p. 7-14 of the ASCA Report Volume I).

e) Provide dimensional sketches showing the location of the plume impingement shield and Kaowool wrap.

f) Provide dimensional sketches showing the arrangement of the rotofoam and your evaluation which justifies its use in a fire barrier.

2. Provide a sketch showing the arrangement of the water curtains in the reactor building.

, ,-