ML20134P224
| ML20134P224 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 08/29/1985 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20134P209 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8509060200 | |
| Download: ML20134P224 (2) | |
Text
-
a
.[
%'o, UNITED STATES 3'
' 'n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3
g WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 o
s...../
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NOS. 67 AND 53 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NOS. NPF-4 AND NPF-7 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE NORTH ANNA POWER STATION, UNITS NO. 1 AND N0. 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-338 AND 50-339
==
Introduction:==
By letter dated September 28, 1984, the Virginia Electric and Power Company (the licensee) requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TS) for the North Anna Power Station, Units No. I and No. 2 (NA-182). The proposed changes are administrative in nature and correct errors in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) provided in the licensee's previous submittals and which were approved by the NRC on May 5, 1983.
Discussion:
A proposed change to the NA-182 TS 4.11-2 would include the Containment Vacuum Steam Ejector (Hogger) as a gaseous release path that should be monitored. A containment air sample would be grab-sampled and have a minimum analysis fre.
quency of prior to each release for each ejector. The above release path was inadvertently left out of the licensee's RETS submittals of December 16, 1982 and February 25, 1983 which were subsequently approved by the NRC on May 5, 1983 as Amendments No. 48 and No. 31 for NA-182, respectively.
A proposed change to the NA-1&2 TS 5.1.2 would indicate that the low population zone is shown in Figure 5.1-2 instead of Figure 5.1-1.
Figure 5.1-2 was in-advertently deleted in the licensee's previous submittals.
The NA-182 TS Figure 5.1-1 would be revised to include the location of the Meteorology (MET) tower. The location of the MET tower was inadvertently left out of the licensee's previous submittals.
A proposed change to the NA-1 TS 4.11.2.5 would revise the table number that is referenced in the surveillance requirement. The table number should be revised to indicate Table 3.3-14 instead of Table 3.3-13.
8509060200 e50829 PDR ADOCK 05000338 P
~
i
.o
, Finally, Amendment No.11 was inadvertently left off the NA-2 TS 6.10.2n.
The proposed change to 6.10.2n would make the requirement read " Records of meetings of the System Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee to issuance of Amendment No.
11."
Evaluation:
The proposed changes are needed to correct the above stated administrative discrepancies inadvertently submitted by the licensee in the NA-182 RETS submittals and the subsequent issuance of Amendments No. 48 and No. 31 for NA-182, respectively. The proposed changes correct errors and provide con-sistency to the NA-1&2 TS, and on this basis, are therefore acceptable.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION These amendments involve a change in the installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.
The staff has determined that the amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously published a proposed finding that these amendments involve no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding. Accordingly, these amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 651.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR $51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of these amendments.
CONCLUSION We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Date: August 29, 1985 Principal Contributor:
Leon Engle
- - _ -