ML20134D282
| ML20134D282 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 08/13/1985 |
| From: | Paperiello C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Edelman M CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20134D285 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8508190174 | |
| Download: ML20134D282 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000440/1985042
Text
_____
__
'
AUG .t 3 3935
Docket No. 50-440
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating
Company
ATTN:
Mr. Murray R. Edelman
Vice President
Nuclear Group
Post Office Box 5000
Cleveland, OH 44101
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by D. E. Hills,
G. F. O'Dwyer, and R. D. Lanksbury of this office on June 22 through
August 2,1985, of activities at Perry Nuclear Power Plant authorized
by NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-148 and to the discussion of our
findings with Mr. M. D. Lyster and others of your staff at the conclusion
of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in non-
compliance with NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Appendix.
A written response is required.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter and the enclosures will be placed in the NRC's Public Document
Room.
The responses directed by this letter (and the accompanying Notice) are
not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and
Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
.CII0 n R Signed by J. J. II4FriSo4 w
~
i
4
8508190174 e50813
ADOCK 05000440
0
C. J. Paperiello, Director
Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix, Notice
of Violation
2.
Inspection Report
No. 50-440/85042(DRS)
See Attached List For Distribution
\\\\
fW
-
...
I i:r
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating
2
AUG 131985
. Company.
Distribution
cc w/ enclosures:
J.-J. Waldron,. Manager, Perry.
Plant Technical Department
M. D. Lyster, Manager, Perry Plant
-Operations Department
L.
0.~ Beck, General-Supervising
Engineer, Nuclear Licensing and
Fuel Management Section.
DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
desident' Inspector, RIII
~
Terry J. Lodge, Esq.
James W. Harris, State of Ohio
' Robert H.-Quillin, Ohio
Department of Health
9
.
tb
bh&kO'Dwyer % $cE, ,
h
- Hilld/kja
Lanksbury Rin
_nop
F r ison Paper 1ello
08/12/85-
6 l3
8 15
-
_
_ _ _
.
O
t
6
9
e
'
>
p.
I
e
l
t t
.
P"
k
\\
v
F
b
>
$
1
)
.g
9 r'
p
,^
+
-
. .
.
.
. ,
,
N
=
g
- f.*
-
,
-
m.
.
\\ .
,
'
lg -- I ( '_ &
g
6
-
'] %
,] e
(
b
- '
F
,
f
%
- *
, .
% , ,
a
.
' g
,
,
c
_ .
.
b
4
9
4
'-
6
+
,
s
4
6
e
f
f
n
'%
I<
$
-a
g
t.
I*
e
I . p'
1
I
- -
___ .._
W
.
,
Appendix
2
Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to establish adequate
measures to insure that the Shift Test Engineer was aware of the
status of his system, with respect to temporary alterations, while
it is undergoing testing and to thereby insure that the required
testing demonstrated that the structures, systems and components
will perform satisf actorily in service (440/85042-07(DRS)).
.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).
3.
10 CFR 50, Appendix D, Criterion XIV, as implemented through the
licensee's CNQAP, Section 1400, requires that measures be established
to indicate the status of individualitems of a nuclear power plant.
Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to establish and implement
adequate measures to indicate the jurisdictional status of equipment
within the Control Roorr..
Adequate controls had at one time existed,
but aue to a chance in an Operations administrative procedure, these
controis were negated (440/85042-06(DRS)).
Tnis is a Severity Levei V violation (Supplement II).
Pursuant to the Drovisions of 10 CFE 2.201, you are required to submit to
this office witnin thirty days of tne date of this Notice a written statement'
or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:
(1) cor-
rective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be
taken to avoid furtner noncompliance; and (3) the date wnen full compliance
will De achieved.
Consideration may be given to extending your response time
for good cause shown.
y
{' hfu ", '
\\
10
AUG 131985
Dated
C. J. Paperiellc, Director
Division of Reactor Safety