ML20134A705

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Radiological Aspects of Upper Head Injection Removal & Related Radiological Impacts on Plant Operations.Response Requested within 30 Days
ML20134A705
Person / Time
Site: McGuire, Mcguire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/04/1985
From: Adensam E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
References
NUDOCS 8511070548
Download: ML20134A705 (3)


Text

- -. -....

1 i

l November 4,1985 DIST31 ON:

\\J10cket Nos. 50-369/370 NRC PDR i

Docket Nos: 50-369 Local PDR l

and 50-370 PRC System i

LB #4 r/f l

EAdensam Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President MDuncan Nuclear Production Department DHood i

Duke Power Company ORothberg JPartlow l

422 South Church Street RSerbu BGrimes Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 DLangford EJordan FCongel ACRS (16)

Dear Mr. Tucker:

Attorney, OELD

Subject:

Request for Additional Information Regarding Radiological Aspects of UHI Deletion The NRC is reviewing your letters of May 9 and October 2 and 14,1985, proposing license amendments and Technical Specification revisions in support of deletion of the Upper Head Injection (UHI) systems at McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2.

We find that additional information identified in the enclosure is needed regarding the radiological aspects of UHI removal and related radiological impacts on plant operations.

Your response to the enclosure within 30 days of this letter is requested.

Contact our Project Manager, Darl Hood, at (301) 492-8408 if you have questions.

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect r

fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely.

l Original Signed by L. L. Kintner, for Elinor G. Adensam, Chief Licensing Branch No. 4 l

Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

l Request for Additional Information l

l cc: See next page l

l f'(

950 DL:LB #4 LA:pp B #4 L:LB #4 l

DHood/hmc MDdhca t EAdensam i

16/I/85 10/c /85 Jc'/,e//85 li n^

ll /

9

lF i

Mr. H. B. Tucker Duke Power Company McGuire Nuclear Station i

CC:

Mr. A. Carr Dr. John M. Barry Duke Power Company Department of Environmental Health P. O. Box 33189 Mecklenburg County 422 South Church Street 1200 Blythe Boulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 t

Mr. F. J. Twogood County Manager of Mecklenburg County Power Systems Division 720 East Fourth Street Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 1

P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Chairman, North Carolina Utilities Connission Mr. Robert Gill Dobbs Building Duke Power Company 430 North Salisbury Street Nuclear Production Department Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 P. O. Box 33189 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Mr. Dayne H. Brown, Chief Radiation Protection Branch J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.

Division of Facility Services Bishop, Libeman, Cook, Purcell Department of Human Resources and Reynolds P.O. Box 12200 1200 Seventeenth Street, N.W.

Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 Washington, D. C.

20036 Senior Resident Inspector c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission Route 4, Box 529 i

Hunterville, North Carolina 28078 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission, 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 L. L. Williams Operating Plants Projects Regional Manager Westinghouse Electric Corporation - R&D 701 P. O. Box 2728 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230

s ENCLOSURE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING RADIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF UHI REMOVAL 1.

Describe the actual hardware changes and activities that will be made to accomplish UHI removal.

Include those construction steps which result in radiological exposure to personnel or generate radioactive waste.

Identify differences, if any, in these changes and activities for the two McGuire units.

2.

Pruvide an estimate of the occupational radiation dose determined for the overall Upper Head Injection System removal project at McGuire I & 2.

This should include the following:

(a) doses and manpower for major subtasks (b) typical dose rates expected (c) maximum dose rates expected, and locations 3.

Provide a comparison of dose incurred during task performance and dose avoided (e.g., reduced operations, maintenance, ISI for system components, seismic restraints / snubbers) over plant life by removal of the UHIS.

4.

Identify measures to be taken to assure that doses to workers during task performance will be ALARA. This should cover, for example, task planning, special training, use of mockups, area and system decontamination and airborne radioactivity, efforts to minimize number of workers, and applica-tion of experience from similar efforts in the industry.

5.

Identify the types and volumes of radioactive waste which are expected to be generated (e.g., piping, components, insulation), and discuss disposal plans for these wastes.

6.

Identify and briefly discuss any special radiological problems which may be associated with this task (e.g., very high dose rates, very high contamina-tion levels, high radioiodine levels, need for multiple dosimetry).

.