ML20134A580

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 2 to AP600 Design Criteria Documents
ML20134A580
Person / Time
Site: 05200003
Issue date: 03/11/1994
From: Bruschi H
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20134A548 List:
References
AP-3.6, NUDOCS 9701290003
Download: ML20134A580 (5)
v • d • e


Text

_ _ _

AP 3.6 2 .

W Westinghouse Electric Corporation

" Advanced Technology Business Area AP600 Design Criteria Documents AP600 OW ygu n . . - ~ , .

H. . BruscN. General Manager 03-11 94 Program Operating Procedure goy,nc e 7,cnnoiogy go,,n,,, 4,,,

AUTHOR / COGNIZANT Contact Manager, AP600 Plant Engineering, on questions FUNCTION conceming this procedure.

PURPOSE This procedure establishes requirements for the preparation, review, approval and revision of Design Criteria Documents for the AP600.

SCOPE This procedure applies to all AP600 Design Criteria Documents prepared by Westinghouse. AP600 contractors will prepare Design Criteria Documents in accordance with their own procedures using a format similar to that defined in this '

procedure.

DEFINITIONS Desian Criteria Document - A document defining requirements for n design of specific aspects of the AP600. Typically these 4

(d' documents cover a single discipline or subdiscipline.

Desian Criteria Manual - A Manual that incorporates the top level Design Criteria Documents.

Responsible Manaaer - The individual who identifies the need for a Design Criteria Document and is responsible for its preparation in accordance with this procedure.

Responsible Enoineer - The engineer who is assigned to develop 4

the Design Criteria Document.

PROCEDURE General A. A Design Criteria Document is prepared to define criteria for use in subsequent design activities. It translates safety,

, licensing and contractual requirements into detail design requirements in order to assure a uniform design basis within all engineering activities.

B. Design Criteria Documents are intended to provide mandatory  ;

requiremeris for subsequent design activities. The I documer.ts can be supplemented as required by design l guides if guidance rather than mandatory requirements are to I be defined. i l

te2so.wptio(cusT)-os1484 Page 1 of 5 ooos.FRM 9701290003 970115 PDR ADOCK 05200003 A PDR

I

~

)

WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY OLASS 2 I AP 3.6 2 C. The iniSal issue and all subsequent revisions shall be precared in accordance with the detailed procedure described below.

D. A Design Criteria Manual will be compiled consisting of top level Design Criteria Documents. It willinclude documents 1 prepared by Westinghouse under this procedure as well as documents, prepared by other AP600 contractors, reviewed and approved for project use by Westinghouse. ,

l E. J.Thabetic revision symbols shall be used prior to placement of the criteria dccument under configuration control.

Thereafter, numeric revision symbols shall be used.

Revisions require change approval in accordance with the i change control procedure (AP 3.2). The design change l number shall be identified on the cover cheet. All technical l changes shall be listed on the Record of Changes Sheet and i shall be identified by a verticalline in the margin. The I complete document will be reissued for each revision.

F. Plant Engineering coordinates preparation and completion of I the Design Criteria, coordinates AP600 Contractor preparation and review of Design Criteria Documents and assists in l integration, review and approval cycles.

Responsibility Action Responsible Manager 1. Identifies need for a Design Criteria Document within his area of responsibility and define the scope of the document.

2. Assigns responsibility for the preparation of the Design Criteria Document.
3. Identifies interfacing organizations that will provide input, review and/or approve the Design Criteria Document.

Responsible Engineer 4. Prepares the Design Criteria Document utilizing the format and content guidelines identified in Appendix A.

5. Obtains a document number in accordance with the standard AP600 numbering system (GW GMP 005).
6. Ensures that all design inputs used in the preparation of the document are protected in accordance with the applicable records flow schedule.
7. Distributes copies of the draft document to reviewers and others, as required.

mm ., emum Page 2 of 5 rmaw io 1

WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 2 AP-3.6 2 y~\

V( Responsible Manager 8. Assigns an independent verifier to verify the document.

Independent Verifier 9. Reviews document for adequacy, correctness and completeness.

Interfacing Groups 10. Review and comment on the draft document.

Responsible Engineer 11. Resolves comments on the document generated during the review process.

12. Obtains required approval signatures on the cover and intemal review sheet, j Responsible Manager 13. Ensures that the Responsible Engineer has resolved l comments with the verifier and mandatory reviewers and has obtained approval signatures on the sign-off sheet.
14. Reviews, approves and signs-off the Design Criteria Document.

Responsible Engineer 15. Relesses the Design Criteria Document to Program Control and Contract Administration.

O Program Control and 16. Distributes the Design Criteria Document as specified h Contract Administration by the responsible engineer. Incorporates document in AP600 records.

Plant Engineering 17. Identifies the top level criteria documents to be included in the Design Criteria Manual and identifies the distribution list for  !

the Design Criteria Manual.

Program Control and 18. Distributes the Design Criteria Documents selected for Centract Administration inclusion in the Design criteria Manual to the controlled distribution.

REFERENCES 1

A. AP-3.2, Design Configuration Change Control for AP600 Program, Phase 2  !

l

  • l B. GW GMP 005, AP600 Document Numbering '

FORMS / EXHIBITS AP600 Document Cover Sheet Exhibit 10 AP600 Standard Intemal Review Sheet - Exhibit 17 AP600 Record of changes - Exhibit 16 V

imso .,iom a. Page 3 of 5 rmis e io o

e

~

'" ~

  • WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 2 APPENDICES Appendix A Design Criteria Format and Content 1

l l

' * * * "

  • Page 4 of 5 ,,,,,,,o 9

o

- - - - - . ~ . - _ _ - - - - - - - - . - - . - . . - - - . - - - - . -

t

. WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 2 4

AP.3.6 2 APPENDIX A j DESIGN CRITERIA FORMAT AND CONTENT

. The Design Criteria Document shall be prepared using the following forms: 1 I

4 AP600 Document Cover Sheet -in accordance with Exhibit 10  !

4 AP600 Standard Intemal Review Sheet - in accordance with Exhibit 17

AP600 Record of Changes - in accordance with Exhibit 16 2
Subsequent pages shall include "AP600 Design Cnteria Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2" in the header and the AP600 document number, revision number, page number and date in the footer.
The Design Criteria Document shall include a Table of Contents with the following sections

i Section 1.0 Introduction

1.1 Purpose and Scope

1.2 Background

1.3 Definitions and Acronyms '

Section 2.0 Codes and Standards Section 3.0 and subsequent section numbers may be selected by the author Section References shall be the last section Appendices The Design Criteria Document shall define the criteria in sufficient detail that design of the plant in accordance with the criteria will meet all technical and licensing requirements. The '

document shall consider the following design inputs:

a) Regulatory requirements. If the design criteria include any exceptions from Regulatory Guides, Standard Review Plans or other licensing documents, such exceptions shall also be documented in the 'AP600 Compliance with SRP Acceptance Criteria" (GW GL 001).

b) ALWR Utility Requirements. If the design criteria include any exceptions from the Utility Requirements Document, such exceptions shall also be documented in the " Comparison of AP600 Design with the Utilities Requirements Document".

Section 2.0 identifies the Codes and Standards imposed on the user of the criteria document, and is distinct from references which are provided in the last section to describe where requirements come from or to provide assistance to the user in understanding the criteria. In 1 general, Regulatory Guides, Standard Review Plan sections and ALWR sections should be  !

identified in the references and not in Section 2.0. AP600 requirements implementing the position should be incorporated in the body of the criteria document. Thus, any interpretation  !

of the Regulatory or URD requirements is done by the Responsible Engineer for the Design l Criteria Document and reviewed by all interfacing groups.

O nono ., comm Page 5 of 5 nww to

)

)

1

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20134A580&oldid=2876975"