ML20133Q035

Advises That Proposed Operations Acceptable

ML20133Q035
Person / Time
Site:	07000036
Issue date:	04/15/1958
From:	Beck C US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Johnson L US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20133G976	List: ML20133G999 ML20133H026 ML20133H053 ML20133H071 ML20133H111 ML20133H128 ML20133H160 ML20133H168 ML20133H186 ML20133H229 ML20133H299 ML20133H318 ML20133H326 ML20133H329 ML20133H342 ML20133H366 ML20133H375 ML20133H381 ML20133H398 ML20133H401 ML20133H417 ML20133H439 ML20133H445 ML20133H452 ML20133H455 ML20133H469 ML20133H475 ML20133H480 ML20133H501 ML20133H519 ML20133H532 ML20133H537 ML20133H564 ML20133H600 ML20133H624 ML20133H639 ML20133H646 ML20133H688 ML20133H705 ML20133H765 ML20133H774 ML20133H797 ML20133H805 ML20133H823 ML20133H828 ML20133H830 ML20133H832 ML20133H847 ML20133H858 ML20133H859 ... further results
References
FOIA-96-343 NUDOCS 9701270198
Download: ML20133Q035 (1)

Text

, _.

...+.u...

s.

Office Xemorandum ux1rso srirss covsaxuexr Lyall E. Johnson, C~aicf D ATE :

PTCject U70 To Licensing Branch Docket -/70-3d Clifford K. BeCh, Chief FROM g

Ha::ards Evaluation 3 ranch sunjecT: 1.LGLINCIC'I.DT CIE:ICAL 'dCPIS APPLICA?IE FCR A?GTIIZ;T OF S?.M-33 In reply to your memorandun of March 19,1958, we have reviowed the information (dated March 1h,1958) sulnitted by the applicant in reply to our earlier questions.

The subject amendment deals with four processes or operations:

1.

Felleting Process 2.

Hooded Grinding Operation 3.

All-Assay UO2 Pr duction Facility h.

UO F2 2 and UO (NO )2 Facility 2

3 If these operations and processes are carried out in accordance with the procedures and with the safeguards and limits outlined in the subject application and amendments, we see no reason, from the stand-point of nuclear safety, why the proposed operations are not acceptable.

i N

9701270198 970114 PDR FOIA FLOYD96-343 PDR

Lyall S. Johnsor., Chief Project #70 Licensin; Branch Docket #70-36 Clifford K. Beck, Chief Hazards Evaluation Ihanch MALLINCKPLDT CHE'IICAL WORKS APPLICATIr!' FG RC'U!ENT OF Sli?t-33 In reply to your memorandum of March 19,1958, we have reviewed the information (dated March 1h,1958) sulrtitted by the applicant in reply to our earlier questions.

1 The suhject amendment deals with four processes or operations:

1.

Pelleting Process 2.

Hooded Grinding Operation 3.

All-Assay UO2 Production Facility h.

UO F2 2 and UO (NO )2 Facility 2

3 If these operations and processes are carried out in accordance with the procedures and with the safeguards and limits outlined in the subject application and amendments, we see no reason, from the stand-point of nuclear safety, why the proposed operations are not acceptable.

4 11 O

I i

o h

i (LEh j

SURNA40E >

DATE >

3........._....._.,~.-

~~

~

~

+7cyzpeprg jp.