ML20133P701
| ML20133P701 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07000036 |
| Issue date: | 07/04/1956 |
| From: | Beck C US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Johnson L US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20133G976 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-96-343 NUDOCS 9701270064 | |
| Download: ML20133P701 (2) | |
Text
"c 5 L-
~.ema ?.
fMT G:.:2:9
- ~""*"A" l
Of] ice Memorandum. unruo srsrns
.,. -:: m : lnDATE! ' Cl.l '3 ' ;359 l
Lyall Johnson, Chief, Licensing Branch
'~
1 i
Division of Civilian Application To 7
- Clifford K. Beck, Acting Deputy Director j[7 0
Reactor Hazards Evaluation Staff, DCA PaoM ICENSE COMMENTS ON MALLINCKRODT CED4ICAL WORKS
SUBJECT:
SYMBOL:CA:RHES:CKB Comments on Material Presented in Apperdhr I_
the
- 1. After hydrolysis of the UF6 in a 5" diameter x 4' cylinder, 1
d batches subsequent processing vill be done "in 'always safe' sizeHov of 0 7 pounds of uranium."
pound quantities?
- 2. Ite hood in which hydrolysis is carried out is " curbed for dep hold of 4" and the curbed area vill have sufficient capacity toFor top enric j
the entire contents of the hydrolysis system."Is it made safe by batch ment this is not geometrically safe.
control? If so, how?
- 3. A 4" deep x 12" diameter filter is very close to a geomet Is some limits on batchcc can be made critical at top enrichment.
planned here? If so, what?
- 4. " Moist filter cakes vill be removed from the f f
containing 0 7 pounds..."
Comments on Appendix r
e k h
cipitate A
l Proposed discharge of*hydrolyzed material, and of t e pre slurry,. into "always safe" gecanetry slab tanks 4" x 4' x C'
questionable procedure.
l
- s. highly enriched materia.
than
.m
~ Bowever,15 the case in which s s' ingle batch containing not mor
.m E
l Y,y ::..
v.'.
v
%L,d'4ajaiindiesbe'that concentrationsinece
, t, "'.
i d pth would not be 3
' hy$ oven'1ry massniform*:aistiibutteeQl1@ teak,of.th s e
$Qfy als ;a?one: shot" procedure P
uq g J, ;1 w w $ ess' sis g o,1 % m A(.,,,t...f %
'g,? w[g,h "",,sibley therei%> rem;1sn%isihasis;tha e
. I.s 7
~ ted..'"
NE.
$#ifa 4s[Je s
fff.
f k'
Af {,ff!
t
'h.'
iQN
,,,4 c g..< e,.,
./
a CLASSIFICATION CAJECELLED
~
. M p.
et ", ' ' @ 70 gh4pWp,y.y,,3 e.
i.defingd y['merseted Ilda, W.
2.
" "" gGf igg
@eb
. 4, M,
M
.yp_
{& k'h". 8
'N**
6D.... kh b$ hk u. $"LrL% $ Q g,, tts m p f;. h 7._ 7'0 e '
^w wv?
~
- 'f s
9701270064 970114 pig E,
PDH FOIA
= ^ ^ -
FLOYD96-343 PDR
~ r ; f;.
3 lyall Johnson 2
f,: 6 n y: ~ u- 'e tyg
~,, ! X O O t t aid ii s General Comments:
- 1. There seems to be some misunderstanding of the term "always safe",
and where the concept it implies may be safely invoked. Where cer-tain supervision, bookkeeping, procedural controls or other limi-tations are necessary to insure safety at any point, "always safe" has'no meaning.
- 2. In these processes, where safety dependence is placed on control of batch size, the system of checks and balances intended to insure the necessary care should be further described.
Attachments:
Mallinckrodt Chemical Works Applications of Mayj5 and June 18, 1956, for SM4 License 4
5 lESh... -
'8
(' ' ' ' ~- T *, !4 tre: n *:31 N D d iM3 J 3 i
_,; yy g gy9 9 i
3R U'L*.it. T'st8 ft:1 s
_t
..),
~
~
1., f g ?
.