ML20133P701

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Comments on Mallinckrodt Chemical Works Application for SNM License
ML20133P701
Person / Time
Site: 07000036
Issue date: 07/04/1956
From: Beck C
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Johnson L
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20133G976 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-96-343 NUDOCS 9701270064
Download: ML20133P701 (2)


Text

"c 5 L-

~.ema ?.

fMT G:.:2:9

  • ~""*"A" l

Of] ice Memorandum. unruo srsrns

.,. -:: m : lnDATE! ' Cl.l '3 ' ;359 l

Lyall Johnson, Chief, Licensing Branch

'~

1 i

Division of Civilian Application To 7

Clifford K. Beck, Acting Deputy Director j[7 0

Reactor Hazards Evaluation Staff, DCA PaoM ICENSE COMMENTS ON MALLINCKRODT CED4ICAL WORKS

SUBJECT:

SYMBOL:CA:RHES:CKB Comments on Material Presented in Apperdhr I_

the

1. After hydrolysis of the UF6 in a 5" diameter x 4' cylinder, 1

d batches subsequent processing vill be done "in 'always safe' sizeHov of 0 7 pounds of uranium."

pound quantities?

2. Ite hood in which hydrolysis is carried out is " curbed for dep hold of 4" and the curbed area vill have sufficient capacity toFor top enric j

the entire contents of the hydrolysis system."Is it made safe by batch ment this is not geometrically safe.

control? If so, how?

3. A 4" deep x 12" diameter filter is very close to a geomet Is some limits on batchcc can be made critical at top enrichment.

planned here? If so, what?

4. " Moist filter cakes vill be removed from the f f

containing 0 7 pounds..."

Comments on Appendix r

e k h

cipitate A

l Proposed discharge of*hydrolyzed material, and of t e pre slurry,. into "always safe" gecanetry slab tanks 4" x 4' x C'

questionable procedure.

l

s. highly enriched materia.

than

.m

~ Bowever,15 the case in which s s' ingle batch containing not mor

.m E

l Y,y ::..

v.'.

v

%L,d'4ajaiindiesbe'that concentrationsinece

, t, "'.

i d pth would not be 3

' hy$ oven'1ry massniform*:aistiibutteeQl1@ teak,of.th s e

$Qfy als ;a?one: shot" procedure P

uq g J, ;1 w w $ ess' sis g o,1 % m A(.,,,t...f %

'g,? w[g,h "",,sibley therei%> rem;1sn%isihasis;tha e

. I.s 7

~ ted..'"

NE.

$#ifa 4s[Je s

fff.

f k'

Af {,ff!

t

'h.'

iQN

,,,4 c g..< e,.,

./

a CLASSIFICATION CAJECELLED

~

. M p.

et ", ' ' @ 70 gh4pWp,y.y,,3 e.

i.defingd y['merseted Ilda, W.

2.

" "" gGf igg

@eb

. 4, M,

M

.yp_

{& k'h". 8

'N**

6D.... kh b$ hk u. $"LrL% $ Q g,, tts m p f;. h 7._ 7'0 e '

^w wv?

~

'f s

9701270064 970114 pig E,

PDH FOIA

= ^ ^ -

FLOYD96-343 PDR

~ r ; f;.

3 lyall Johnson 2

f,: 6 n y: ~ u- 'e tyg

~,, ! X O O t t aid ii s General Comments:

1. There seems to be some misunderstanding of the term "always safe",

and where the concept it implies may be safely invoked. Where cer-tain supervision, bookkeeping, procedural controls or other limi-tations are necessary to insure safety at any point, "always safe" has'no meaning.

2. In these processes, where safety dependence is placed on control of batch size, the system of checks and balances intended to insure the necessary care should be further described.

Attachments:

Mallinckrodt Chemical Works Applications of Mayj5 and June 18, 1956, for SM4 License 4

5 lESh... -

'8

(' ' ' ' ~- T *, !4 tre: n *:31 N D d iM3 J 3 i

_,; yy g gy9 9 i

3R U'L*.it. T'st8 ft:1 s

_t

..),

~

~

1., f g ?

.