ML20133H526
| ML20133H526 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/09/1977 |
| From: | Case E NRC - REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW COMMITTEE |
| To: | Gossick L NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20133H510 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-628, RTR-REGGD-01.106, RTR-REGGD-1.106 NUDOCS 8510170443 | |
| Download: ML20133H526 (3) | |
Text
_ _ _.
, y O
O February 9, 1977 1
I4C!OM20H FOR:
Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations FROM:
E. G. Case, Clairman, Regulatory Requirements hview Connittee SUa7ECT:
SUID'ARY OF REGUIATORY REQUIPDERS REVIEii COFt!Im MEETING NO. 50, JNJUARY 28, 1977 The Co:nittee reviewed:
1.
PROPOSED REVISTai 1 'IO REGUIRIORY GUIDE 1.106, " THERMAL OVERIIRD Piulu;2Idi
\\,
OR ELECTRIC fDIORS ON !OIOR-OPERATED VALVES" and recomended accroval.
'Ibe Cor.nittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No backfit.
2.
PROPOSED REGUIAIORY GUIDE 1.XX, "INSTALIATION DESIGN NID INSTALIATION OF IMGE LEAD S'IOPAGE BATTERIES FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLNiTS" and reco::mnded approval with the following cot: ment.
Although the Comittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No i
a.
backfit, it recomended that the Office of Inspection and Enforcement give added emphasis in its inspection of existing facilities to w'
the hydrogen explosion potential of large lead sealed cell storage 1
batteries.
?
3.
PROPOSED REVISIOi 1 'IO RIBULb"ORY GUIDE 1.97, "INSTRUMENTATIQ1 FOR LIGIC-iri%TER-CCDLED NUCLEAR POWER PIRITS 'IO ASSESS PIRrl' CGIDITIGG DUPlNG AND FOLIIMING AN ACCIDE!C" and returned it to the staff for q
~I rework and resubmittal in accordance with Committee conraents,
,I including:
..J a.
Justification of the specific valves chosen for the ranges of the
.t instruments listed in paragraph C-3.
1 b.
Consiceration of the environmental (including seismic) qualifications for these instruments listed in paragraph C-3.
/
+-
Consideration of the coments on this guide from the Division of /h j
Operating Reactors (Environmental Evaluation Branch).
I h
c.
v 3
g I
-_j._
8510170443 851008 or r.c.,
oats,
Fura AEC 318 (Rev. 9 53) M 0240 W u. e.sovsanuswr paswrine opricas eers.sae.coe
' ': Wu ~
j:s.".-
hxin >
2&MSMidfifjy?p4wg5%{GJ'QjQy ',
- 'l.
. :. l.?,')...:
- l lI
, a &:"'; : (
hj~l.R
. ~
- ,: 9 ; >; ";, ~<;; p '
L
,; y -
v-
~
~~
v y
$1_
M y /y' Lee V. Gossick '
Tne Corxaittee has characterized this guide as Category 3 - Backfit required -
for all apolications in review for which the Q-2 questions to the applicant have not yet been sent; and Category 2 - Further staff consideration of individual cases required in order to determine the need for backfitting -
for all operating reactors.
4.
PEPOSED P1HILMORY GUIDE 1.XX, "DESIG'i REC /UITd2iEliTS FOR FUEL OIL SYSTEMS EDR STNIDBY DIESEL GENEREORS" and returned it to the staff for rework and resurmittal in accordance with Coccittee cosaents, including:
l
=
a.
Consideration of the,tporcpriate number of fuel oil tanks for a l
facility with one unit and two units; the tank interconnection philosophy and safety and safeguards requirements and the quality assurance requirements for such installations.
The remaining item on the agenda was deferred by staff request to a later l
meeting.
' Dynal Signed St.
I E. G. Case E. G. Case, Chairman Ibgulatory Tisquirements Review Comaittee
~
DISTRIBUTION:
Central files LWR-4 Reading Additional Distribution on Following page n
OFFtC =
- R
/
r z$ se DATE M Forum AEC-518 (Rev. 9 53$ ABCM 0240 "k u. s. eovsanuswr rainisme orrecas sers.sae-see
-r. s ;
/-
/
/
.. ~
C
{
{/
DISTRIBUTION:
L. V. Gossick B. Rusche E. Case R. Boyd B. H. Grier R. B. Minogue !.
E. Volgenau 3-T. Murley i
R. Heineman k_ j V. Stello H. Denton S. Levine F. Schroeder M
M. Grossman f
S. H. Hanauer T. Rehm
.{,
John B. Martin 1
L. Rouse t
W. Minners A. A. Johnson D. B. Vassallo,
R. P. Denise
__7 D. J. Skovholt Karl Goller D. Eisenhut j
J. P'~ Knight
-)-
D. F. Ross R. L. Tedesco M. Ernst a
V. A. Moore
.W. P. Ganmill 7..,
Sue Gagner
.l
[; 'o j.,8 L '..]
9 i
<,.4j' 7
u t
4 6
w 1
i i
I
--.y,.,..
y O
e
~
DISTRIBUTION:
April 12,1977
/CentralFiles i
a t
l I'.DORNIDUM EOR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations E. G. Case, Cnairman, Regulatory Recuiremnts E"rGi kview Comittee
?-
3 SUMMRY OF REGUIATORY REQUIRD.ENTS RE. IEW COW.IITEE V
SUllTD3 MEETING 10. 60, MABCH 22,1977
'Ihe Cotnittee revieweds.
1.
Proposed Begulatory Guide 1.XX, " MEDICAL CERTIFICATIOJ AND lOtfrIORING OF PERSO1NEL REQUIRING OPERAIOR LICENSES" dated February 11, 1977, and recomended approval subject to the i
following coments A statement should be included in paragraph C, Regulatory a.
Fosition, to clearly limit the information to be provided on each e:::ployee referred for a reactor operator medical exami-
^
nation to that necessary for the designated r.edical examiner to complete the appropriate form.
I The Ctomittee characterized this guide as Category 1 -
No backfit.
2.
Proposed hvision 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.115, "PICIECTICH AGAINST IIM TRMECIORY 'IURBINE MISSILES" dated February 1,1977, and recommended apprcval, with the coment that the Turbine Missile Task Force should expedite its work on the remaining aspects of the r
turbine missile issue.
(
(I The Comittee noted that consideration should be given to the preparation of a regulatory guide addressing other turbines i
besides the large steam turbines which form a part of the main turbine-generator set.
The Committee res.3ed that the provisions of this guide be effective imediately for all construction permits docketed after Nove::ber 15, 1976. For all other applications and operating gl' reactors, the Committee characterized this guide as Category 2 -
Further staff consideration of individual cases r fred to determine k'
U, h
the need for backfitting.
2O 4
,,f ' - m _ - u 2w - # J-(
~ ~
~.
~~
RRC R
C orrec. >
ECh ' D i
.o I
4/12/77 2/77 l
m c,e m m - m m m
- m
- m n
~
. u
w; ww..a mm.n ~
r- ~ wn...
?
'
- T -- # g
'7 aa-
%w ^=
p.p> Q+,l..
.___..__W
'v
.n 1'
+,e.
/.
3.
Proposed Bevision 1 to Regulatory Guide 1.63, "CIECTRIC PEdL7 RATIO 3 ASSEMBLIES IN CGCAINMI21T STRUCIURES FOR LIGIT HATER COOLED ITJCLEAR POWER PLAhTS" dated January 13, 1977, and re e nded approval subject to the following cocoents:
a.' he guide should be returned for Occraittee consideration af ter expiration of p:blic cocoent period (even if no corrents are received).
b.
All NRC personnel with past or current interest in the subject matter of this guide should be invited to attend the Coccittee meeting that next discusses this guide.
- c. ' The guide should' reference the applicable industry standard frem which the x/R ratios were taken.
d.
In Section C, paragra;h 3 of the Begulatory Position, duration times should be included for both molded-case and air current'
' breakers.
Se Coccittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No backfit for all plants and applications evaluated on the basis of Revision O of this guide; and for all others as Category 2 -
Further staff consideration of individual cases required to jy -, y determine the need for backfitting. '
u,.
~.
x, 3
~
Y:.. k 7 n,;-('
Yf;*. *,,., '
- ,'T
- ,,&j,,
,;G +y _
lp-
~
., rg
~.
m, 3, 3. ; y gg gg m
E. G. Case e-E. G. Case, Chairman Begulatory Requirements Review Connittee
~
~
r.,
-f;.. See next page
.. ~
,?.
+
s v:.
,V j
%l;;,
v
['!,:d :
E%k,
- ~,
4 A,- '
.,a'
?,
.x; q:y,. 1 U,
[-
t-e.
~
- y,
a 7,y,
c a.,
'~"'
.l.
rs Y,.
suana u s *
'*f '
v
=s
~
cats
- NRC FORM 318 (9 76f NRCM 0240 W u. s. eov8RNMSNT PRINTING OFFICEa 9979 = S$$444 7
s;-
.{
g*
DISTRIBUTION:
)
n a
s February 28, 1977 i
l l
H l
PD ORANDUti FOR: Ice V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations FE".:
E. G. Case, Chairman, Regulatory Requirements I
Review Comnittee I
SUSJECT:
SUMMARY
OF REGULMORY REQUIRDUCS REVIEW COittITIEE 1
MEETING NO. 59, FEBRUARY 18, 1977 4
'Ihe Cmunittee reviewed:.
J 1.
Backfit Recausnandations on Proposed Regulatory Guide 4.12, "HYDROIDGIC DESIGN CRITERIA FOR WATE3K0tCROL STRUCIURES NOT REIATED TO RADIO-IDGICAL SAFETY AND CONSTRUCFED FOR NUCIEAR POWER' PIAN 15" dated November 3,1976, and recommended approval.
2.
PIQUEST FOR RTGC REVIDi OF HYDROIDGY-METEOf0IDGY BRANCH POSITION ON ACCIDENT METD3ROIDGY ASSESSMENTS, dated Dececiber 10, 1976, and recc ernded disapproval in its present form with the further j
recomunendation that the proposed position be prepared as a regulatory i
guide to be issued for comment, and returned for Constittee review..
4 3.
Proposed Regulatory Guide 1.XX, 'MAINTBIANCE, TESTING AND REPIACEMarr OF IARGE LEAD STORAGE BATTERIES FOR NUCIJER POWER PIANIS* dated.
a nar==*=c 20,1976, and rM approval with the comment that test interval requirements are already covered in Regulatory aside 1.32 and should be deleted from this proposed guide.
i The Cannittee characterized this guide as Category I - no backfit.
4.
PROGOSED REVISIONS TO CATEGORY DEFINITICBIS UrILIZED BY THE CDMGTTEE i
IN CHARACTERIZING BACKFIT POTENTIAL OF REGULA20RY GUIDES, and after considerable discussion, the Chairman requested all members to suhait written comments to liin prior to the next meeting (presently
]
acheduled for March 18, 1977).
.f l
Orichst stped 4' b
E.G.
1 E. G. Case, Chairman Regulatory aequirements Review Comunittee M.
e i
terica p. (RRRQf, t a, f.
m i
.m 7 W gh/mw q EC a)k i
W /77 2 M /77 p vo m. m. m.m W. -. _ h. = ~~r u~,~ = ~ vm.. -
o
~n.
D kr DISTRIBUTION:
April 26,1977 Central Files
\\
HEFOIWCUM FOR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations FIOf1 E. G. Case, Chaircan, Regulatory Require.ents Review Comittee SUR7ECT
- SUINA.RY OF REGULA'IORY REQUIRE:CTIS REVIDd CO:HITIT.E MEETING 10. 61, APRIL 13,1977 The Cocznittee reviewed:
s, s
1.
Proposed regulatory Guide 2.X (RS 620-5) " QUALITY ASSURMCE PIOGE!
REQUIRE:GTPS FOR RESEARCH REACIORS", dated February 15, 1977, and recotr: ended approval subject to the following coment:
a.
The Implementation Section should indicate that for operating research reactors, the provisions of this guide will apply to applicable proposed licensing actions subtaitted to the Omission after issuance of this guide.
The Cor.raittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - tio backfit, except as modified above.
2.
Propsed Technical Position for RRRC Consideration on PMR Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping, dated Februa y 22, 1977, and recocuended approval of the propsed Branch Technical Position (BrP) with the following comment:
I a.
A revision to Wulatory Guide 1.44 should be prepared which incorporates the provisions of the Branch Technical Position.
l The Cccinittee recomcaended that the provisions of this BTP '
be effective inmediately for new construction permit applications. For all other applications and for operating l
reactors, the Comittee characterized this BrP as Category 2 -
l Further staff consideration of individual cases required to determine the need for backfitting.
/
}'Y G n tl pri s y r.
- >n
~
'G
" ff-O p V.,* p I i*' " ' l ff -..
f RRRC IWSC( /
orrec s,
l dar/dV EC Se 1
~ ~ ~ ~
e....,
4/ b 7 4/26/77'
.us,
l' NRC FORM SIS (9 76) NRCM 0240 M u. e. eovannesEnv reenvin's arreces sore-ese eaa
eM
- ,r-l=
4;;gmes_-sm -%w.un;.uss.g e., _, -ym,'L&::
..:. ~ 3 m
s.-
W4
- '[
. y
_y 3.
Proposed Ibvision I to Regulatory Guide 1.118, "PI:RIODIC TESTING OF ELECTRIC PCEER AND PfunxnON SYSTEMS", dated February 28, 1977, and recomended approval.
'Ihe Cocnittee recomended that the provisions of this proposed revision be applied to new construction permit applications docketed after the date of issuance of this revision. Ebr all other applications and operating reactors, the Committee characterized this guide as Category l'- No backfit of those provisions of the guide beyond those requirements currently v
included in the Standard '&chnical Specifications.
,i Item 3 of the agenda was deferred to a later meeting.
f Original Signed 81 E. G. Case i
E. G. Casa, Chairman 5
Pegulatory Requirements Review Co:mlittee See next page
/
3, m
.~h. -r
.... 's 1;.n%. ~~; x.
-: n
- ' 5
. ~lt.1.-:%,
_., 7,. '.
(
..m.
,,-y"...
.M,**=,.
- r.
e s'- >'
e n
..g~
u,'Ql *.T.'? ;, *, ? ' '..,s.'.,. l ,'
e, n..,.Y.~. ' < * '.}'
~*' Y$
,?
.'e
..-g,_,. - -' ^l _ -
s g
y
?,
- ,., y : "..; 9 s ' * =,
.* : - ;g - -
- g '
- }9 4
.. s y ;;.
_, j_ *
.s
. x, c.-
,3s,.
Y. -
a.
l n..
t.
l
?
,d;~
t i
J 1
3 t
y s
,i e.
' s l.
w.
r
.4 i
, i.
~l'-'
r y
~~9 y
, s y
j,y
..?
=
O'
. -fi e
e i-oFF0C E P V.
> eunun us k DATE >
NZC PORM 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240 W un s.eovsanutwf Parwrine orricas sere eae.es4
.I' in7,.y MW 9
}
t zc
/
?" V 2
DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files Hay 31, 1977 Ph%h%:iDUM FOR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations FRON E. G. Case, Cnairman, Regulatory Requirements Review Comittee SUL7ECT
- SUMiARY OF REGULAIURY REQUIRI? Sirs REVIC.i CD:HITIEC MEETING to. 63, mY 25,1977 The Comittee reviewed:
1.
Proposed Regulatory, Guide 1.xx (RS 050-2), " QUALIFICATION TESTS OF FT.FfTRIC CABLES, FIELD SPLICES AtID OMtiECTIGIS FOR LIGIT WATER COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PIMIS," dated April 5,1977, and recos:: rended approval subject to the following coments:
a.
W e guide should incorporate language that o ghasizes that the j
most severe postulated environmental conditions that result from the entire spectrum of design bases events should be used as test bases rather than those conditions that result from tne IDCA alone, b.
Dr. Hanauer will provide a suggested write-up to the Director, Office of Standards Development, which suitably incorporates and satisfies Dr. Hanauer's concerns about the limitations that should be placed on the intent and use of the guide.
s ne Cmmittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No backfit, recognizing that the backfit of the fire protection aspects of this guide are controlled by Appendix A to Branen Technical Position 9.5-1.
2.
Draft 10, Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.90, " INSERVICE INSPECTION OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES WrIU GIOUTED TENDOtiS" dated April 6,1977, and re-nded approval.
2e Conclittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No backfit.
We remnittee discussed the extent to which reporting requirements as outlined in the revised Licensee Event Report Instruction Manual (dated
()
April 26,1977) imposes requirements which duplicate those of existing i
regulatory guides, and whether such duplication is justified (Item 3 g,
r k
') ku, of the agenda) and conc W that the duplication is minimal and is I
justified by the benefits accrued.
F
, (
\\
.)
')b V
ontvngism yty yvy :ygh. - '
l RRRC.
E. d'. Case, Chairman
.tgulatery-Requifemente-ic'/iew Cc-itLee W'7ECase ces: Eq$4dstl page y,,u,m y,i gi, --
' NRC FORM 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240
@ u. o. eovenmuswr Paswisme orricas e ore -ess-eaa Q -.,., - +
_ c m nm-,
~. -
- -,.. - - ~
j
aw-mmn.. o...
.n.
O 4..
l f
DISTRIBUTION:
Central File August 1,1977 I
HEdORANDtM FOR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations E. G. Case, Chairman, Regulatory Requirements FR04-Review Comittee l
StM4ARY OF REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW C0Hr41TTEE SUBJECT MEETING N0. 64 JUNE 14,1977 The Comittee reviewed:
1.
Proposed Revision.1 to Regulatory Guide 1.100 "SEIS41C QUALIFICATION 0F ELECTRIC EQUIPdENT FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS", dated April 22, 1977, and reconnended approval.
The Comraittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No backfit.
2.
Proposed Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 1.108, " PERIODIC TESTING OF l
DIESEL GENERATOR UNITS USED AS ONSITE ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS", dated April 27, 1977, and recomended approval subject to the following coment:
The wording of Section C.2.a. should be revised to be consistent a.
with the requirements and language of the Standard Technical Specifications.
The Committee characterized this guide as Category 2 - Further staff consideration of individual cases required in order s
to determine the need for backfitting - with the observation that the backfit considerations outlined in the value-impact assessment accompanying this guide represent an acceptable approach except that all provisions of the guide should be included in these considerations.
3.
Proposed Regulatory Guide 1.XXX(SC-523-4), " LOOSE PART DETECTION PROGRAM FOR THE PRIMARY SYSTEM OF LIGHT WATER COOLED REACTORS",
/
l dated May 3,1977, and recomended approval with the following coments:
q/
A discussion should be included to describe an acceptab e a.
jl procedure to satisfy the off-line calibration requireep referred to in paragraph C.l.f. of the proposed guide.
Q l
i b.
No backfit recomendation is made at this time. After receipt nd review of public comments, the staff's backfit recommendation
/should be-submitted for Cnemittop rsview.
f RRC f &R
[$'YjfB 9 ;).y3, a re,e n,-
sc gh :
[
Ava afnm
. 8/ /77
' 8L /1
)C PORM 313 (p.76) NRCM 0240 Tr us s. ooveamasswv paintine orricas sore -ese.es4 4
a n~ U+ f 144gg.g;
.. am y..
4
.: A. n..u y -
x.
~ :r
. c,-
s.
e
%.r h
\\
s7 o
O
.v
~
.F 4.
Branch Technical Position DDR-1, " GUIDANCE FOR RELOAD SUBi41TTALS",
dated May 5,1977, and after considerable discussion referred it back to the staff for resubmittal with the following cocuents:
a.
The inforuation being requested of licensees in the proposed Branch Technical Position should be compared for consistency witn the information requirements of the Standard Format appropriate to the operating license stage.
b.
The impact /value assessment should be reviewed for appropriate amplification.
Tne Comittee noted in passing that it would be helpful,to include in tne forwarding memo that transmits material for Comittee review, any appropriate previous Committee coments on the matter that might bear on curre.nt deliberations and the disposition of same.
(
Original Sip E.G.Can < q Edson G. Case, Chairman Regulatory Requirements Review Comittee
,1
..f CCs(d:,...
'y _
V '
~, r. w
'*w..
~%.
e Ii[.\\'
$ggeX% page'.
^ '
'?'
n f
. p:
'../**'
s
, x ;?, c,"
^.-
/
<y
~,
',, ' y',
p, 7A;y q,
- n?- w
- s...
-'Q' y..
.,e, j,, -.
r
-e
,1
, : ;.x j[... )
<f ',b e
l',
~ '. _ '
.' ~
- ),
?,%
~ 3.,
ve 9,
s
?-
. /,
Wc 4,
w.
,. j r
..( * <
-,,p.,
s y.,
'e'-
v.
',j/ i + 1 /,,,.
1
+.
- . 6 ' ' s" %
, s[
~
- b., ', *. ?'l',. k ;s i.
_ + ' ',
s' s
O
~
. m 3-a :n r
d
.i s -
=*
~
N
/
orric s >
' '. U '
t
- a
~
1 summaus >
a C FORM 313 (9 76) NRCM 0240 D u. o. oovsanusm? reentime orric es e,te-essene b
(
I DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files August 1,1977 s
HD10RANDtJ4 FOR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations FR0t4 E. G. Case, Chainaan, Regulatory Requirements Review Comittee SUBJECT
- StHMARY OF REGULATORY 1tEQUIREMENTS REVIEW C0HKITTEE MEETING NO. 65, JULY 12,1977 Tne Comittee reviewed:
1.
Request for RRRC Review of Regulatory Guide 'NORi4AL WATER LEVEL AND DISCHARGE AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS *, dated May 6,1977, and recosusended approval.
The Comittee characterizec this guide as Category 1 - No backfit.
2.
Proposed Revision 2 Regulatory Guide 1.39, " HOUSEKEEPING REQUIREMENTS
~
FOR WATER COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS", dated May 6,1977, and recomended approval subject to the following comment:
a.
Section C.2 of the proposed revision should indicate that the guide does not rely on Subdivision 3.2.3 of ANSI N45.2.3-1973 c
.g and the reference to Subdivision 3.2.3 in the discussion section
'y of the proposed revision should be deleted.
l The Cosenittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No backfit.
3.
Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position Regarding RADIOLOGICAL ENVIROWENTAL MONITORING dated June 9,1977, and recommended approval of the Branch Technical Position and the proposed
. implementation.
The Committee suggested that the Environmental Protection Agency be j
informed of our actions in this matter.
The first item of the agenda was deferred to a later meeting.
g/;dg73 ig, originnt sgnal Dr n
E.G.Can,
w Edson G. Case, Chairman lh Regulatory Requirements Review Comuni n
09FIC yQg
\\ !Wa[g//ms EGfdse o,,,,,,,,
D7 8/1/77 N
>c'? WJYtm =c'.t.-
~ ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ ~ ~;"" " - ~ ~
(O s
g-
_)
DISTRIBUTION:
Septenber 30, 1977 Central Piles
!O1CRANIXIM EDR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations FROtt C. G. Case, Chairman, Regulatory Regairements kview Comittee SUILTDCT
- SUtNARY OF REX 7JIMORY RECUIRCMDTIS REVIDi COPt!1TIEE MIrrING NO. 66, AUGU Q 31, 1977 he Connittee reviewed:
1.
Proposed Begulatory Guide 1.XXX (RS 618-4) "REPORIDG SIGNIFICANT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DEFICID4CIES", dated June 2,1977, and returned it to the staff for rework and resuinittal taking into account Ctaciittee connents, including:
a.
A mendix A of the proposed guide should be reviewed for appropriate clarification, and internal staff review of A;pendix A should be verified.
b.
W.e procedures and technical content of the proposed guide should be reviewed for consistency with the requirements of Put 3.
t :. t '
i
^..
c.
As appropriate, the results of the regional meetings with industry on Part 21 should be factored into the rework of the guide.
l l
2.
Proposed Regulatory Guide 1.XX, "EESIQi LIMITS AND I/ADING COMBINATIONS ECR CLASS 1 PLATE AND ml TYPE OEPONDIT SUPPORPS", dated June 14, 1977, from the standpoint of categorization only. This guide was previously reviewed and approved by the Comittee on August 31, 1976.
%e Comittee reaffirmed its previous recu.usuation of category 2 -
Further staff consideration of individual cases required in order. to l
determine the need for backfitting.
3.
Draf t Regulatory Guide 1.XXX, " MATERIAL POR OCHCRETE COiTAINMDTIS (Draf t 3, dated July 13, 1977)," dated July 27, 1977, and re n cded approval subject to the following comments
/
&?5&llA 'O,"
?
RRRCj (RRRCf o,r..
- u QVj(@a/mws cGC fe 9/)%/77 9/16/77
~
k NRC FORM 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240 W u. s. oovannwswe enewnwo orre.se sore - ese-se4 I 1,% Y. Q ;;7 s(~,.,' k,cg g 'd 1e..-
WI X< :
ei
'. o :%, ; ; ;; g g ;;
-t -
(
(
a.
The guide should include come indication of the present NEC views concerning the ASMC Section III, Division 2 i
document and the limitations in our approach of referencing j
and/or crdorsing portions of Division 2 via regulatory guides.
\\
me Comittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No backfit.
4.
F5gulatory Guide 1.124, "SERVICC LIMITS AND LCADING CCzGItaTICNS NR CLASS 1 LINI:AR 'NPE CCX4PONDTP SUPPORTS," (Proposed revision 1 dated July 15,1977), dated August 3,1977, and reconnended approval subject to the following comments Regulatory position C.7 concerning the conbination of loads a.
should be clarified regarding consideration of load time-histories.
N Comittee characterized this guide as Catetory 2 - Further staff consideration of individual cases required in order to determine tne need for backfitting.
I i
Originst Siped By E. G. Ca e Edson G. Case, Chairman i
Begulatory Requirements review Comittee c=st See next page l
orreczm>
I l
e u namena=>
omnsee-N
.PORM Staf (9-76) NRCH 0240 W uie, eovannuawt pnownne orrecs sore-ese4a4
m O
O DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files Septer.ter 30, 1977 MI210iWIDUM FOR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations FROM E. G. Case, Chairman, Regulatory Requirements Review Cornittee SUBJELT StPHARY OF REGULMORY REQUIRDiDT2S REVIEW COfMITTEE HEETING NO. 67, SEP m iBER 27, 1977
'Ibe Cocnittee reviewed:;
k t
1.
Proposed Change to Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 1.118, " PERIODIC b
TESTING OF ELDCTRIC POWER AND PMJm; DON SYSIDG", dated July 14, 1977.
h
'Ibe original proposed revision 1, dated February 28, 1977, was reviewed t
by the Cos:nittee at Meeting No. 61, April 13,1977, and recocuended for approval, with a Category 1 - No backfit characterization.
Further staff discussion has resulted in a change to the original proposed revision, and a new proposed revision dated July 14, 1977 was referred back for Cocnittee consideration. 'Ihe proposed revision 1, dated July 14, 1977, was reviewe3 and reconnended for approval by the Cormittee with the following cournent,:
['
a.
C:phasis should be added to the caution in C.7 concerning the use of simulated algnals to preclude any adverse safety imtw-t of such simulated perturbations.
" " D W 71 4
h Cocnittee reaffirmed its previous categorization of this proposed p
revision as Category 1 - No backfit.
g 2.
Proposed Begulatory Guide 1.XX (RS-070-4) " DIESEL GDJERAIOR FUEL OIL SYSTDiS*, dated July 19, 1977, and recormended approval.
b h Cennittee characterized this proposed regulatory guide as follows:
I Category 1 - Porward fit of all provisions of the guide for all new CP applications docketed af ter iz:plerentation date shown in published guide.
J Category 2 - Further staff consideration of individual casen requiredM order to determine the need for backfitting oft b g l,
hegulatory Position C.1 for all CP cases under review SER has not been issued as of inplementation date shown in the published /
g AIR 5k,b hRC dh,[/)
r, SMud/mws EGC [
k[)
.4 7. >.hk77
_9/N/77 F
NRC PORM 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240 D u. s. eove mmasswv paennme o,,,cse sete - ese.esa MhkjZ b r/
MME n,
J',-J~;'*"'kj.;
- . m.,. g y y;.,,g, e @, x g a y U"
~
,..jpl
.s m
.n
/
o o
Regulatory Position C.2 for all Operating Beactr rs t
operating License Applications A
CP casas under review whose SERs are ceapleted as of the inplementation date shown on the piblished guide, including j
PDAS-A I
Category 3 - Backfit required for Regulatory Fosition C.2 for all CP cases under review whose SER has not yet been pub 1'iched as of the icplementation dato shown in the published guide.
3.
Proposed Addition to the Standard Review Plant Section 1.8, "DTTERFACES FOR STNCARD DESIGNS", dated July 19, 1977, and recc::nonded approval of
(
the proposed new SRP including the publication of NUREG-0102 dated May 1977, as an appgndix to aegulatory Guide 1.70, Rev. 2, when
[
next the guide is updated (estimated for early 1978).
c,
'me Conraittee characterized this proposed new SRP as Category 1 - No bacxfit.
[
Ite::n 1 and 2 of the agenda were deferred to a later meeting.
.patsgnedB1
- t. c. ca
?
4 Edson G. Case, Chairman Regulatory Requirements Review Ceaus).etee CCs!
See next page k
B 4
' carecs >
evnaaess >
oava >
[ NRCPORM 313 (9 74) NROI 0240 TT us s. novea==ew? Pas =Tsas errects tote ese eee
.,,y"
- a z, w.,
n,,. ;,,.,; y
---r s; ;;
g 16 j,
,,,... +
j, s
' d
/
i WE6WWWuncaQ%awq p e.-
.j O
O DISTRIBUTION:
CENTRAL FILES Deccinber 6,1977 9
HEMORA:lDUM F0k: Lee V. Gossick, Executive 61 rector for Operations E. G. Case, Chairv.an, Regulatory Requirements FR0rt Review Comitte?
SUMARY OF REGULATORY REQUldEMENTS REVIEW COMITTEE SUBJECT MEETING NO. 68, A0VEMBER 15, 1977 l
The Coussittee reviewed:
1.
Request for RRRC Review of Regulatory Guide " LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING AllALYSIS AND DESIGN OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS",
cateo July 21, 1977, and recor.nenced approval suoject to the following corxaents:
In paragrapn C.l.a of the proposed guide (page 1.XX-19 uf the a.
June 1977 draf t), the statement concerning "... experienced professional engineers and geologists..." should be replaced with
"... engineers and geologist of cemonstrated qualifications...",
or. other such suitable wordi.ng. :...w..
- z. u
.. c. 1, *: t ~:.
..it In paragraph' C.I.d (page 1.XX-20 for tests where standard procedures D.
l are not utilized, in addition to the requirements listed. a require-ment should be included for; describing the bases for deviations from standard procedures.
~
The Coosaittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No backfit..
2.
Proposed Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.122, " DEVELOPMENT OF FLOOR DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR SEISHIC DESIGN OF FLOOR SUPPORTED EQUIPMENT OR COMPONENTS", dated July 27,1977, and recounsended approval.
The Committee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No backfit.
3.
Joint Branch Position and Regulatory Guide on PERMANENT DEWATERING SYSTEMS",
dated August 9,1977, and recommended approval subject to the f 11 coments.
,, (.,, g
~
In Section IV, paragraph (a), and'aCober citat1ons where i
a.
appropriate, alternate language should be used to indicate (w safety significance of the system rather than using the designation "Cet w,j l' RRRC yC
(
o,,ie s,
.u....* _Ta ECase j
_12 3/77 12/8/77__
I'ihSIMI
..n *
- ve e..ovsa==ene rainvia. carica. ieve -
4a.
b, tac ronx 3:e (976) Nacu 024o e
/
O w
a*
.w e
s
/ c
/
r b.
Additional emphasis should be given to requiring either the capability of tne system to survive design-oasis events (or an appropriate backup capability) or to snow that failure does not result in a safety concern.
c.
Incidental issues, as discussed, will be jointly resolved by the Director, Division of Site Safety, and the Director, Division of Systems Safety, ana will not require return to tne Committee.
The Couuittee recomended further staff, consideration of the long-term iraplications of this position; for example, its impact on cecocnissioning.
Tne Co.mittee recocuends preparation of a regulatory guide on this position.
The Co.mittee characterized this position as Category 1 - No backfit.
4.
Working Paper "D" Regulatory Guide 1.91, Rev.1. " EVALUATIONS OF t
EXPLOSIONS POSTULATED TO OCCUR ON TRANSPORTATION ROUTES NEAR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS", dated Septemoer 12, 1977, and recoortended approval subject to tne following comments:
a.
In Paragraphs C.1 and C.3 of the Regulatory Position language should e
be incluced to allow tne use of specific blast equivalency when properly justified in lieu of the envelope blast requirements.
b.
.The Implementation Section should indicate that the guide is effective insaediately on publication.
z 4
4a e
The Committee characterized this guide as Category 2 - Further staff 5
consideration of individual cases required in order to determine the need for backfitting.
5 5.
Draft Regulatory Guide 1.72. Revision 1
" SPRAY POND PLASTIC PIPING (Draft B, September 1977)", dated September 19, 1917, and reconnended approval.
The Committee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No backfit.
L
~
Original Signed By E. G. Case a.
Edson G. Case, Chairman i
Regulatory Requirements Review Committee
~
r s
Ccs*
See next oaae
+
orreca p tummame >
Y cate >
NRC PORM 313 (9 76) NRCM 0240 W u. e. eovsamment reintime orreces sete-ese.ese
,, y s - '. ' ~
4_h M"'? '2, < ?:
y
~
- r73,
- jp. '
g q:4.% mg.,
er 1 w
..;. 2 a w w,.",~ ~ -
m,,, y. 3,. _;; p g i p w,.
m.. _ _
._w-
- ~,x.
0 0
, /
DistriDution:
L. V. Gossick, 6209 MNBB E. G. Case, P-428 J. D. Saltzman, P-416 R. S. Boyd, 278 R. C. DeYoung, 278 L. P. Crocker, 278 D. B. Vassallo,110 J. F. Stolz,144 K. Kniel,147 U. D. Parr,128 S. A. Varga, 116 R. P. Denise, 266 T. P. Speis, 268 D. J. Skovholt, 266 C. J. Hel temes, P-320 R. d. Houston, 242 P. F. Collins, 357 V. Stello, S28 J. W. Reece, 528 L. R. Nicnols, 528 J. T. Telford, 528 K. R. Goller, 340 A. Schwencer, 316 D. L. Ziemann, $42 G. Lear, 338 R. W. Reid, 330 J. R. M111er, 216 R. A. Clark, 228
^
J. M. Elliott, 216 U. G. Eisennut, 642 W. Butler, 416 R. Baer, 516 B. K. Grimes, 238 L. C. Snao, 440 R. J. Mattson, P-1102 F. Scnroeder, P-1102 W. Minners, P-1102 W. Haass, P-1102 J. P. Knight, P-530 R. J. Bosnak, P-924 S. S. Pawlicki, P-1000
- 1. Sihweil, P-1022 R. L. Tedesco, P-822 J. C. Glynn, P-822 C. G. Long, P-822 V. Benaroya, P-822 (continued)
E,MhrIM6Ml' u9 -
=-e m WA :r e e.%#'
+ - _-
'9
~
~.
O O
' Distribution (continued)
- 6. Lainas, P-904 T. A. Ippolito, P-722 F. Rosa, P-822 7
- 0. F. Ross, P-1030 f
R. E. Ireland, P-1030 Z. R. Rosztoczy, P-1030 P. S. Check, P-lll4 l
T. M. Novak, P-1132 H. R. Denton, P-202
- b. H. Muller, P=2-2 F. Mi raglia, P=2-2 1
W. P. Gammill, P-328
-i J. C. Stepp, P-314 k!
L. G. Hulman, P-214 W. E. Kreger, P-712 M. L. Ernst, P-302 B. J. Youngblood, P-302 R. L. Ballard, P-234 R. H. Vollmer, P-514
- 0. F. Bunch, P-008 J. Collins, P-730 f
V. A. Moore, P-518
- 6. W. Knighton, P-528 i
W. H. Regan, P-522 T. E. Murley, 113055 r
N. C. Moseley, EW-359 H. O. Thornburg, EW-359 E. Volgenau, EW-359
(
S. Levine, 113055 M. Grossman, 9604 MNBB S. H. Hanauer, 6211, MNBB t
T. Rehm, 6209 MNBB R. Cudlin, 642 S. Gagner, NL-S650 A. A. Johnson D. P. Allison, 144 J. Angelo,144 H. E. Chakoff, 144 f
L. Engle,144 L. L. Kintner, 144 R. E. Martin,144 I. A. Peltier,144 C. Inomas, 144 R. A. Birkel, 148 v
R. A. Benedict,148 f
.5 G
l l
(E
\\
(
.n g-, ; <., 3 a e, m----
- - a. -
g..
o o
9 Distribution (continued)
S. 8. Burwell, 147 i
M. M. Miynczak,147 H. Rood,147 J.* C. Snell, 147 U. L. Tibbitts,147 A. Bournia, 120 T. H. Cox, 128 A. W. Uromerick,128 E. A. Licitra,128 S. Miner, 128 R. Stright,128 W. Pike, 128 W. F. Kane, 116
- h. D. Lynch,116 l r,,
C. W. Moon,116
~
H. Silver,116 C. R. Stanle, 116 J. N. Wilson,116
- 0. S. Hood, lib 4
I 1
~
~
- ~. -.
0 l~'
O E
DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files Deccooer 8. 1977 I
a nEnudAN00M FUR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations I
FRod E. G. Case, Cnairuan, Regulatory Requirements Review Connittec SUBJECT
SUMMARY
OF REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW C0lvilTTEE MEETI4G NO. 69. NOVEMBER 29, 1977 The Comittee reviewed:
1 1.
Proposed Regulatory Guide 1.ZZ, " DESIGN, TESTlHG, AND HAINTENANCE
.I Cd1TERIA FOR NORMAL VENTILATION EXuAUST SYSTEM AIR FILTRATION AND A0 SORPTION UNITS OF Ll6tti WALER C00 LEO huCLEAR POWER PLAhTS,' (Draf t dated July 1977), dated June 23, 1977, and recocraended approval.
l The Comittee characterized tne proposed guide as Category 1 - No backfit.
2.
Proposed Revision 2 to Regulatory Guide 1.62. " DESIGN, TESTING, /.'C.
MAINTENANCE CRITERIA FOR ENGINEEREU-SAFETY-FEATURE ATHOSPliERE CLEANUP SYSTEM AIR FILTRATION AhD ADSORPTION UWITS OF LIGHT WATER C00 LED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS."(draf t dated July 1977), dated June 23, 1977, and recosseended approval.
In an earlier meeting (No. 43, January 9,1976), the Comaittee characterized Revision 1 of this guide as Category _2.
This present Revision 2 is cnaracterized by the Coanittee as Category 1 - No backfit.
It is the intent of the Comittee that tnose actions underway as a result of Conmittee action on Revision 1 need not be disturDed oy Revision 2, althougn Revision 2 sody be used in those actions if so desired.
3.
Reg. Guide 1.127. "!NSPECTION OF WATER CONTROL STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED' WITH NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS" (Proposed Rev.1, September 1977), dated Septemoor 23, 1977, and recomended approval subject to the to110 wing consents:
a.
In the introductory paragraph under Section C, Regulatory Position, a s
discussion should be included concerning the role of the Syte in f.
tne inspection of water control structures.
ch h
nh ' -).-
RRRC1#
oee.c = e-12.1
/77 12 7
. m,.
% us.ove.~~.e ~~~ orrm em-**~u ~% N 'lj j :ll,3 M,
mc ronu ne tom uncu ouo
- .,..n?,
}.
L,}Y3i.]
[.... s..
'/
4
,/ b.
In Paragraph C.6 (page 1.127-8 of the proposed revision) the words
... registered professional engineer..." should be replaced with
".. engineers of derconstrated qualifications..." or other such suitable wording c.
Tne wording to be used in the guide concerning the ninintna reservoir oepth will be resolved by the Director gf Standards Development and the Director of Site Satety.
Tne Comittee characterized this guide as Category 3 - Backfit required.
4.
Proposed Regulatory Guide 1.28, Revision 1 (RS 707-5) " QUALITY ASSURANCE PK0 GRAM REQUIREMENTS (DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION)" dated September 23,1977, and recocraended approval.
The Comittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No backfp.
5.
Regulatory Guide 1.43 " CONTROL OF STAINLESS STEEL WELD CLADDING OF LOW-ALLOY STEEL COMPONENTS" dated September 26, 1977, and af ter considerable utscussion, referred it back to the staf f for resubmittal if additional justification as to the necessity for such a guide can be developed.
c.
Proposed Revision to Standard Revleit Plan 5.4.7, " RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEH", dated November 8,1977, and while concurring with the technical content of the proposed revision, deferred Comnittee action pending further discussions on implementation to be held at the next meeting.
i Original Signed By E.G.Can Edson G. Case, Chairman Regulatory Requirements Review Committee ccs:
See next page
.,,,e s Cummaase >
- 's>
NIC FORM 310 (9 74) NRCM 0240 D u. e. eovenoement paintene opeses, sore.ess4em D*7 --* - -
I
, u us..~:u,a - ~.n-=
- w-u :ww.. _
_e,~-
o Utstrioution:
L. V. Gossick, 6209 MNB8 E. G. Case, P-428 J. D. Saltzman, P-416 R'. S. Boyd, 278 R. C. DeYoung, 278 L. P. Crocker, 278 D. B. Vassallo,110 J. F. Stolz, 144 K. Kniel, 147 O. U. Parr, 128 S. A. Varga, 116 R. P. Denise, 266
,i T. P. Speis, 268 D. J. Skovholt, 266 C. J. Heltemes, P-320 R. W. Houston, 242 P. F. Collins, 357 V. Stello, b28 J. t. Reece, S28 L. R. Nichols, 528 I,
J. T. Telford, 528 K. R. Goller, J40
'l A. Schwencer, 310 lj D. L. Ziemann, 642 G. Lear, 338 R. W. Reid, 330 7
J. R. Miller, 216 R. A. Clark, 228 J. H. Elliott, 216 U. G. Eisennut, b42 W. Butler, 41b i
P.. Llaer, bl6 9
B. K. Grimes, 238 L. C. Snao, 440 o
R. J. Mattson, P-1102 F. Scnroeder, P-Il02 0
W. Minners, P-1102
')
W. Haass, P-1102 J. P. Knight, P-530 R. J. Bosnak, P-924 S. S. Pawlicki, P-1000
[
- 1. Sibweil, P-1022
.i R. L. Tedesco, P-822'
'j J. C. Glynn, P-822 r
C. G. Long, P-822
,h V. Benaroya, P-822 (continued)
--_.-..y
- ~ _
(,
Distribution (continued)
I G. Lainas, P-904 T. A. Ippolito, P-722 F. Rosa, P-822 0, F. Ross, P-1030 i
R. E. Ireland, P-1030 Z. R. Rosztoczy, P-1030 P. 5. Check, P-ill4 T. M. Novak, P-Il32 H. R. Denton, P-202 D. M. Muller, P=2-2 F. Miraglia, P=2-2 W. P. Gammill, P-328 J. C. Stepp, P-314
=
L. G. Hulman, P-214 1
W. E. Kreger, P-712 M. L. Ernst, P-302 B. J. YoungDlood, P-302 R. L. Ballard, P-234 R. H. Vollmer, P-514
- 0. F. Bunch, P-008 u
J. Collins, P-730 V. A. Moore, P-516
- u. W. Knighton, P-528 W. H. Regan, P-522 T. E. Hurley,11305S N. C. Moseley, EW-359 H. O. Thornburg, EW-359 E. Volgenau, EW-359 S. Levine,1130SS M. Grossman, 9004 MNBB S. H. Hanauer, 6211, MNBB
~,'
T. Rehm, 6209 MNBB R. Cudlin, 542 S. Gagner, NL-S650
(
A. A. Johnson I
- 0. P. Allison, 144 J. Angelo,144 H. E. Chakoff, 144 L. Engle, 144 L. L. Kintner, 144 R. E. Martin,144
- 1. A. Peltier,144 C. Inomas, 144 i
R. A. Birkel,148 R. A. denedict,148 l
4
TCM-c -
~
O O
1 5-D'istribution (continued)
S. B. Burwell, 147 M. M. M1ynczak, 147 H. Rood,147
~
J.' C. Snell, 147 D. L. Tibbitts,147 A. Bournia, 120 T. H. Cox,128 l
A. W. Uromerick, 128 E. A. Licitra, 126 l.
S. Miner, 128 t
R. Stright,128
+
W. Pike, 128 W. F. Kane,116 0
M. D. Lynch, 116
~
C. W. Moon,116 H. Silver,116 C. R. Stanie, 116 J. N. Wilson,116
- 0. S. Hood, llb i.
?
i F.
e.
l
(
?
b IT.
b l
r-
)
a t.
L4
'5/
r, r.'
__"*__,_,..._____.._-.~.__7,-
.__._-.._p..
F E
-eK,
- T 7,
_7A 7
7 g
_6 g
c (e
(
n.-
DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files February 16, 1978 l
i HEf0RANDuol FOR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations FROM E. G. Case, Chairman, Regulatbry Requirements b
Review Comittee SUBJECT
SUMMARY
OF REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW COMMITTEE NEETING N0. 70, DECEMBER 20, 1977 j
I The Comittee reviewed:
l 1.
Regulatory Guide "ATHOSPHERIC DISPERSION N0DELS FOR POTENTIAL ACCIDENT CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENTS AT WUCLEAR POWER PLANTS" (Draf t dated 9/13/77),
1 dated September 28, 1977, -and memo dated October 18, 1977, and af ter i
considerable discussion retWned it to the staff for consideration of Corraittee corments and resutunittal.
i 2.
Proposed Revision 1-to Regulatory Guide 1.117, " TORNADO DESIGN CLASSIFI-CATION", dated October 3,1977, and recommended approval subject to the following comments:
i a.
Clarification should be made in the Discussion (Section B) that i
equipment used to provide long-term emergency core cooling should j
be'both redundant and protected.
. y,
,m.,
b.
The use of the phrase "well within" in connection with offsite doses and 10 CFR Part 100 should be eliminated and replaced with l
the numerical guidance indicated in the footnote on page 4 of the l
proposed revision.
l The Connittee characterized this guide as Category 2 - Further staff l
consideration of individual cases required in order to detemine the I
need for backfitting.,
3.
Petition for Rule' Making PRM 50-17 "N0 SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION",
l dated October 20. 1977 and concurred in the content of the proposed Commission staff paper and the notice of proposed rule making (Enclosure A to the staff paper).,
~~'
&YSll}%I.- Hpg.
)
?h Edson G. Case, Chairman i
Regulatory Requirements Review Committee, e s
.A;;;s;.
See next pago RRRC D
b ~ /ms
~
l EC i
__r 2/
/J8 2./.16/28.
om unc tonx 3:e e,.763 nacx o 4o u.........,.=via.............
. g.r
- /
(g
'g l
.. Distribution:
[
L. V. Gossick, 6209 MNBB E. G. Case, P-428 J. D. Sal tzman, P-415 R. S. Boyd, 278 R. C.'DeYoung, 278 L. P. Crocker, 278 D. B.-Vassallo, 110 J. F. Stolz, 144 K. Kniel, 147 O. D. Parr,128 S. A. Varga, 116 R. P. Denise, 266 T. P. Speis, 268 D. J. Skovholt, 266 C. J. Hel temes, P-320 R. W. Houston, 242-P. F. Collins, 357 V. Stello, 528 J. W. Reece, 528 L. R. Nichols, 528 J. T. Telford, 528 K. R. Goller, 340 A. Schwencer, 316 D. L. Ziemann, 542 r
G. Lear, 338 R. W. Reid, 330 J. R. Miller, 216 R. A. Clark, 228 J. M. Elliott, 216 D. G. Eisenhut, 542 W. Butler, 416 R. Baer, 516 B. K. Grimes, 238 L. C. Shao, 440 R. J. Mattson, P-1102 F. Schroeder, P-1102 W. Minners, P-1102 W. Haass, P-1102 J. P. Knight, P-530 R. J. Bosnak, P-924 S. S. Pawlicki, P-1000 I. Sihweil, P-1022 R. L. Tedesco, P-822 J. C. Glynn, P-822 C. G. Long, P-022 V. Benaroya, P-822 l
, _ "S,"<?Wy%.k$.
.- nt s.
- <bj na w y.g <~
,7 _
+
- (.. 3_ -_-
h 8
e
. i,I
'I-Distribution (continued)
G. Lainas, P-904 T. A. Ippolito, P.722 F. Rosa, P-822 0', F. Ross, P-1030 R. E. Ireland, P-1030 Z. R. Rosztoczy, P-1030 P. S. Check, P-1114 T. M. Novak, P-ll32 H. R. Denton, P-202 D. M. Muller, P-202 f.
F. Miraglia, P-202 W. P. Gamill, P-328 J. C. Stepp, P-314 L. G. Hulman, P-214 W. E. Kreger, P-712 M. L. Ernst, P-302 B. J. Youngblood, P-302 R. L. Ballard, P-234 R. H. Vollmer, P-514
- 0. F. Bunch, P-608 J. Collins, P-730 V. A. Moore, P-518 G. W. Knighton, P-528 W. H. Regan, P-522 T. E. Murley,11305S N. C. Moseley, EW-359 H. D. Thornburg, EW-359 E. Volgenau, EW-359 q
S. Levine,1130SS M. Grossman, 9604 MNBB S. H. Hanauer, 6211, MNBB T. Rehm, 6209 MNBB 1
R. Cudlin, 542 0
E. Hill, NL-5650 9
D. P. Allison,144 l
J. Angelo,144 H. E. Chakoff,144 L. Engle,144 L. L. Kintner,144 R. E. Martin,.144
- 1. A. Peltier,144 C. Thomas, 144 R. A. Birkel, 147 R. A. Benedict, 147
7 K i.;iy a -a w y;c>;;e, ~
- v..
-M
' ~ ;'
N t,
O' O
ai N h j1,p I
l Distribution (continued) g S. B. Burwell,147 l"
M. M. Mlynczak, 147 k
H. Rood,147 J. C. Snell, 147
['
D. L. Tibbitts,147 A. Bournia, 128 T. H. Cox,128 A. W. Dromerick,128 E. A. Licitra, 128 S. Miner,128 R. Stright,128 7
W. Pike, 128 h-W. F. Kane,116 t*
M. D. Lynch, 116 i
C. W. Moon,116 e
H. Silver,116 C. R. Stable, 116 t
J. N. Wilson,116 D. S. Hood,116 J. Riesland, EW-359 A. A. Johnson r
f b
4.
1 J
t'
?.'
k.
Iy w
A t
9 9
ee L-
-m z.=
,p-._____.
(j DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files i
February 16, 1978 L
KEMORANDUM FOR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Oper'3Bs FROM E. G. Case, Chairman, Regulatory RequirerN Review Comittee
SUMMARY
OF REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW COlti c SUBJECT MEETING NO. 71, JANUARY 31, 1978 The Comittee reviewed:
1.
Draft Ef fective Rule $50.44, " STANDARDS FOR COMBUSTIBLE GAS CONTROL SYSTEMS", and Amendment to General Design Criteria 50 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, " CONTAINMENT DESIGN BASIS", and Revision 2 of R.G.1.7, " CONTROL OF COMBUSTIBLE GAS CONCENTRATIONS IN CONTAINMENT F0LLOWIkG A LOSS-0F-COOLANT ACCIDENT", dated October 14,1977. and j
recocraended approval.
l l
The Committee characterized proposed Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.7 as Category 1 - Wo backfit.
s
.,. ( c
.,<j-s 2.
Branch Technical Position 00R-1, " GUIDANCE FOR RELOAD SUBMITTALS", dated.
October 28, 1977, and recommended approval.
em.
- sy 0
- ittec o
3.
Position for Review and Acceptance of " SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND HANDLING APPLICATIONS", dated November 11, 1977, and recommended approval.
i The Comittee noted that this proposed position is intended for use in the review of applications for increasing spent fuel storage capacity at operating reactors and does not conflict with the intent j
of existing Standard Review Plans and Regulatory Guides governing spent fuel storage provisions for CP and OL applications. The Consmittee further noted that consideration should be given whether additional j
guidance concerning the mix of stored fuel would be helpful..
m.
In the context.of Operating Reactor applications for increasing spent I
fuel storage capacity, the Cosmiittee characterized this guide as I
Category 1 - No backfit., i
?>
- . n
'a f
4.
Working Paper "D" Regulatory Guide 1.XXX, " SAFETY RELATED CONCRETE STRUCTURES", dated November 9, $377, and reconmended apprmra h*1 r
7v9p9 r. m fP-
,; 9
~.
anny
'yNr da6al/ms eMe om
- 2 78 2/h/78 w
[
jeg n..
f 1 q..
R 9
l
+.(a G
l The Comittee characterized this guide as Cateoory 1 - No backfit, noting that applications docketed af ter the effective cate of the guide (approximately 8 months af ter publication) which reference a current PDA will be exempt from the guide provisions.
5.
Proposed Regulatory Guide 1.XXX, " CONTAINMENT ISOLATION PROVISIONS FOR FLulD SYSTEMS", dated Hovember 16, 1977, and recocraended approval.
The Comittee characterized this guide as:
Cateaory 2 - Further staff consideration of individual cases required in order to deteanine the need for backfitting for:
All Operating Resctors and OL reviews.
All CP and PDA reviews for which round Q-2 questions have taken place as of the date of guide public'ation for coment.
Catecory 3 - Backfit required for:
All other CP and PDA applications in review.
6.
Revised Implementation Schedule of Proposed Revision to SRP 5.4.7, Residual Heat Removal System, and recomended approval. The l
Comittee in Heeting No. 69 had recommended approval of the technical i
content of the proposed revision to SRP 5.4.7 but requested the staff j
to return after a review by the staff of the ther,-proposed implementation schedule. The revised implementation schedule considered by the Comittee is outlined in a memorandtn of January 19, 1978 f rom R. J. Mattson to E. G. Case, subject: Revised Implementation Schedule of Task A-31, RHR Shutdown Requirements. The details of this memorandta (which the Cotraittee recomends be used by the staff for specific guidance) s is generally characterized by the Committee as follows:
Category 2 - Further staff consideration of individual cases required I
in order to determine the need for backfitting for:
l All Operating Reactors and all other plants (custom or standard) l for which the issuance of the OL is expected before January 1, 1979.
Category 3 - Backfit required of certain specific provisions (as outlined in the January 19, 1978 memorandum, Mattson to Case, referred to above) for:
All plants (custom or standard) for which CP or PDA applications were docketed before Januaryl,1978, and for which OL issuance is expected after January 1,1979.
orrecap suwwaws k
f4
~4
/
/
_3 The Comittee concurred in the recocnendation that provisions of the
[
pos.ition apply to CP or PDA applications docketed on or after January 1, 1978.
l r
Edson G. Case, Chaiman
- )
_ c.-
Regulatory Requirements Review Cossaittee O
ccs:
See next page 1
1 l
l l
1
=
l
.e 1
?s
[:8 1
1 s
c
' tt. 2M
. '...> r. :.
~
.2-7.
r.u s:
e s.
P..
's. t
- :c 5:v. F -s.
C L - r,'i ';
l
^
or rsc s >
oummaus >
D Af s >
NRC FORM 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240 W u. e. novsanusm? reinvene orrecte este -escase
r
/
a 4
Distribution:
L. V. Gossick, 6209 MNBB E. G. Case, P-428 J. D. Saltzman, P-415 R. S. Boyd, 278 R. C. DeYoung, 278 L. P. Crocker, 278 D. B. Vassallo, 110 J. F. Stolz, 144 K. Kniel,147
- 0. D. Parr,128 S. A. Varga,116 R. P. Denise, 266 T. P. Speis, 168 D. J. Skovholt, 266 C. J. Heltemes, P-320 R. W. Houston, 242 P. F. Collins, 357 V. Stello, 528 J. W. Reece, 528 L. R. Nichols, 528 J. T. Telford, 528 K. R. Goller, 340 A. Schwencer, 316
- 0. L. Ziemann, 542 G. Lear, 338 R. W. Reid, 330 J. R. Miller, 216 R. A. Clark, 228 J. M. Elliott, 216 D. G. Eisenhut, 542 W. Butler, 416 R. Baer, 516
- 8. K. Grimes, 238 L. C. Shao, 440 R'. J. Mattson, P-1102 F. Schroeder, P-1102 W. Minners, P-1102 W. Haass, P-1102 J. ~ P. Knight, P-530 R. J. Bosnak, P-924 S. S. Pawlicki, P-1000 I. Sibweil, P-1022 R. L. Tedesco, P-822 J. C. Glynn, P-822 C. G. Long, P-822 V. Benaroya, P-822 (continued)
a i
-lMi*
ll i
e O
O 1;
p
} ;,. i I
Distribution (continued)
G. Lainas, P-904 i
T. A.-Ippolito, P-722 1:
F. Rosa, P-822 D. F. Ross, P-1030 R. E. Ireland, P-1030 Z. R. Rosztoczy, P-1030 P. S. Check, P-1114 T. M. Novak, P-ll32 H. R. Denton, P-202 l
- 0. M. Muller, P-202 F. Miraglia, P-202 W. P. Ga.anill, P-328 l
J. C. Stepp, P-314, i
L. G. Hulman, P-214 W. E. Kreger, P-712 M. L. Ernst, P-302 B. J. Youngblood, P-302 R. L. Ballard, P-234 R. H. Vollmer, P-514 D. F. Bunch, P-608 J. Collins, P-730 V. A. Moore, P-518 G. W. Knighton, P-528 W. H. Regan, P-522 i
T. E. Murley,1130SS l
N. C. Moseley, EW-359 H. D. Thornburg, EW-359 E. Volgenau, EW-359 S. Levine, 1130SS M. Grossman, 9604 MNBB S. H. Hanauer, 6211, MNBB T. Rehm, 6209 MNBB R. Cudlin, 542 i
E. Hill, NL-5650 i
D. P. Allison,144 J. Angelo,144 H. E. Chakoff,144 L. Engle,144 L. L. Kintner,144 R. E. Martin, 144 I. A. Peltier,144 C. Thomas, 144 R. A. Birkel, 147 R. A. Benedict, 147
\\
f = - :--l xa,. 7-g.,
m.,
,;{.l,,;
g,.,
l '
=v 1
g y
. Distribution (continued)
S. B. Burwell,147 M. M. Mlynczak,147 H. Rood,147
.J. C. Snell,147 D. L. Tibbitts,147 A. Bournia,128 T. H. Cox,128 A. W. Dromerick,128 E. A. Licitra,128 S. Miner, 128 R. Stright,128 i
W. Pike, 128 W. F. Kane,116 M. D. Lynch,116 C. W. Moon,116 H. Silver,116 C. R. Stahle,116 l
J. N. Wilson,116 D. S. Hood,116 J. Riesland, EW-359 L _.
A. A. Johnson l
=
m.
__.-m u --..
s_.-----
D O
j DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files Apr il 10,1978 tEeJnieCJA fur: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations RCi L. G. Case, Chairman, Regulatory Requirements Review Co::raittee SUBJEI.T
- SOMtEY OF IEGULtGORY REQUIREtErm RrNIEW COWsITdt:
PI.ETIWG 10. 72, n%31 14,197d
[
Ihe Comittee reviewed:
1.
Proposed Revision 2 to Regulatory Guide 1.63, "CLSCIRIC PfliLTRATION ASSL%LIL3 IN CCtEAINFSIT STWCIURES FOR LIGIT,iATCR COOLED 1RY'. LEAR R7.ER PL?aiTS" dated liovecber 23, 1977, and recocreended approval suo3ect L
to tne following co:: cents:
t Tne wording in Section C.4 allowing analysis as a substitute for L
a.
the test should be deleted pending public coinaent. It is left to the staff to consider reinstatement after evaluation of such ccc:aent.
L The Co:anittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - IR) nackfit to all applications which n=d eitner Revision 0 or aevision 1 of this guide; and for all others as Category 2 - Further staff con-
?
sioeration of individual cases required in order to determine the 7
need for backfitting.
3
(
2.
Proposed Regulatory Guide "CCCUPATIOliAL RADIATIOt3 D33C ASECM2iT AT LiiR'S - CESIQi STAGE MAN-REM ESTDaTES" dated Nove:nber 21, 1977, and recocraenced approval subject to the following m=nts:
I a.
In tne fourth paragraph under section C, aegulatory Position, 2
second sentence, the words "and inservice inspection" should be acoed to now read' "... this dose assessment include steam generator tube plugging and maintenance, repairs, replacement of pumps, valves, and gaskets, and inservice inspection."
il b.
This guide applies to both CP and OL, applications. Appropriate wording snould be incluoed in Section D, Irplementation, con-4 cerning the intended inplementation at the CP versus the OL stage.
The Comittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No backfit.
O f%W S f f1fv p
- s'f__
l w~~w a'wg 3l
^
RRRC II RC g
orrecE P
,. _ EQ g Sprq
-y s
4 i
f i
$URM aM F M 8
4/10/78
.oavEm NRC FORM 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240
- e.e s. eOVERMBIENT PRIMMMe OFFICES 997e s.See484
'^
'~V'
~ -~ ~ : mac,,3,.%"QZQV39.q:17.3
%, w "'*-? W"
~
Mh ~ ~
f
,..."y4 i
3.
Proposed Ecgulatory Guice 1.XXA(fG 618-4) "RLPoiCIM OF SICJIFICMT OF.JIGN AND C061'f0Cfl0N DEFICIENCIES", Draf t 7, (11/7/77) dated Decenaer 5,1977, and after considerable discussion referred it back l
to the staff for reconsioeration in light of Coccittee cor.nents,
, including:
~
I T
a.
Recent cctivities within IGC concerning ASLB ard A5 LAB notifica-i
. tions and the criteria and procedures to be useo in such
.l rctifications nave focused a great deal of attention to this
- i entire n.atter, particularly the necessity for consistency 1
Detween Part 21 notification,10 CPR 550.55(e) notifications, e
and Board notifications. It appears that a cocprenensive review of all NNC activities in this area is required ana the result well may be in a form other than a regulatory guide.
4.
Request for RIGC Revi,ew of Proposed Beactor Systems Branch Technical Position on " REACTOR COOIMf SYSTEM OVERPRESSURE PRO'fECfl01" dated Deceaner 20, 1977, and recomended approval subject to the following P
counents:
Cw a.
Credit should be allowed for operator action as in the current i
criteria rather than going to automatic actuation as proposed.
o b.
Equipment for overpressure protection should be non-seismic 3
~
Category 1 as proposed, but should be oesignated to witnstand the operating basis earthquake (ode) ground motion.
u
, hc...T She Coneittee characterized this proposed Branch Technical Position y
.,C..
as l};%.*,W '..
^
.'. t b.:
Ed Category 1. No backfit for OLs issued prior to March 14, 1978.*<.
Cateoory 3 - Backfit required for all others.
f
[-
, ;.p.j, ~ V
. Where the OL is' expected to be issued 12 nonths or less P
~'
from March 14, 1978, the position should be inplemented 3
3-by the first refueling.
~
Where the OL,is expected to be issued more than 12 months t
after March 14, 1978, the position should be inplemented h
~
.it start-up.
4.,.
. g Items 5 ard 6 were deferred.to a later meeting.
~ '[ M
' f}.,
p
. Original Signed By '
,, ;/
,...a x P'
l x
.E.G. Case
~;
3-
,' ~
F' Edson G. Case, Chairman f* l
. reguiawry nequire.aents mview muiu w y
ces: See next page 2.
4
')
oWRN Abf E M*
cata p-NRC FORM 518 (9 76) NRCM 0240 W us o. oovannesswr eninnne orreces sore -eso4a4
. _ _ _.m - _.
Y g*.
j ff f
o 'h$ m N
l e,
(%
(3 l
DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files l
May 12,- 1978 l
l t2.JDi?.i DUM POR: Lee V. Gossick, ExecJtive Director for Operations.
FR3il E. G. Case, Chairraan, Regulatory Reqsirements Peview Cottnittee SUtDIrr
- Gut %RY OF RIOJLA':ORY REQUIREMO.'IG REVIE.v COffiII'IEE l
T.EETING IJO. 73, MAY 2, 1978.
.o
'Ute Co::nittee reviewed:'
{
1.
Draft Regulatory Guide, "A'nCSPEERIC DISPERSIO1 iCDELS FOR POTCEIAL ACCIDDR CQ4SEQUDJCE ASSESS!ECS AT NUCLEAR POnTR PIMTS" dated February 3, 1978, and b
AMXIPiiERIC DISPFAZ,IQi 3] DEL FOR ACCIDDR EVAUJtJIOtLS dated April 18, 1976.
Ibe Cc::nittee recocraended that the Director, Office of Standards Develo;r.c.nt prepare on an expedited senedule an Inforration Pa;:ct for the C = L" ion. Tnis Information Paper should discuss the new model, J. t:
compare.it to the current model, outline various alternatives, and
}
indicate our intentions concerning the' use of the new codel.
L
.c
<t, s, m - -
u.,
- 3. n Fending the preparation and RRRC review of this Information Paper, r.
the Cocmittee recor: mended that in the interim:
m.
a.
The staff should alloV Applicants to use either the current o
'. i. c s.: n model or tne proposed new model, '
e
,;. n:.
.I.
- b..'Ibe proposed new model should have specific language added to L:
n.
indicate that the selected x/Q value will be equalled or exceeded
[
c less than a total of 5 percent of the time around the site
[.
. boundary.
' - ^-
g 3,
a.
Item 2 of the agenda was deferred to a later meeting,
[
j I
t V. L.
w % "1 0Y
' :': r >.
~
Mplnvha
? p.-
$]
i
. s.<
Edson c. Case, Chairman i
[
I.
Regulatory Requirements Revie's Consnittec
/7 ces:
R-4 g LJCl-4 erricSPe next-page--
n - >.
-ga/M EC}
S r
a
../. ' /7 8 5/12/78
\\
DATs Da
.. ~'
v v.
NRC FORM 318 (9-76) NRCM 0240 fr v. e. oovannesswy enenvine orrec s. s ete - eas see
W!$r$NONhhk?
?Y ff ' #%.Y.
a
. +f
$N e
9 7
/
Distribution:
I L. V. Gossick, 6209 trJBB Z. R. Rosztoczy, P-1030 H. Vi11alva,128 P. S. Check, P-1114 S. itiner, 128 E. G. Case, P-428 T. M. Novak, P-1132 R. Stright, 128 J. D. Saltzman, P-415 H. R. Denton, P-202 W. F, Kane, 116 R. S. Boyd, 278 D. cl. [1u11er, P-202 fl. D. Lynch, 110 R. C. DeYoung, 278 F. Miraglia, P-202 C. U. floon,116 L. P. Crocker, 278 W. P. Gamill, P-328 H. Silver,116 D. B. Vassallo, 110 J. F. Stolz,144 J. C. Stepp, P-314 C. R. Stahle,116 K. Kniel, 147 L. G. Ilulman, P-214 J. N. Wilson,116 O. D. Parr,128 Li. E. Kreger, P-712 D. S. Hood, 116 M. L. Ernst, P-302 R. Naventi,116 S. A. Varga, 116 R. P. Denise, 2C6 B. J. Youngblood, P-302 J. Riesland, EW-359 R. L. Ballard, P-234 E. Hill. NL-5650 T.' P. Speis, 268 R. H. Vollmer, P-514 A. A. Johnson D. J. Skovholt, 266 D. F. Bunch, P-608 N
C. J. Heltemes, P-320
, J. Collins, P-730 R. W. tiouston, 242 P. F. Collins, 357 V. A. M ore, P-518 V. Stello, 528 G. W. Knighton, P-528 J. W. Reece, 528 W. H. Regan, P-522 L. R. Nichols, 528 T. E. Ilurley,1130SS J. T. Telford, 528 ti. C. fioscley, EW-359 B. Grimes, 340 H. D. Thornburg, EW-359 L
A. Schwencer, 316 C. V 1genau, EU-359 1;
D. L. Ziemann, 542 S. Levine,1130SS G. Lear, 373 R. B. Minogue, NL-5650 R. W. Reid, 330 C. A. Ac1 tto, NL-5650
].
J. R.11 iller, 216 fi. Kehnemuyl, NL-5650
'3 R. A. Clark, 22d R. ti Bernero, NL-5650 J. M. Elliott, 216 R. G. Smith, Nr.r-5650 D. G. Eisenhut, 542 T. C. Roberts, NL-5650 W. Butler, 416 M. Gr ssman, 9604 MdBB R. Baer, 516 S. H. Hanauer, 6211,it1BB r
T. Rehm, 6209 telBB L. C. Shao, 440 R.~ J. Mattson, P-1102 D. P. Allis n, 144
'*/
F. Schroeder, P-1102 U ^"9010'144 W. Minners, P-1102 L. Engle, 144 p".,
W. Haass,'P-1102 L. L. Kintner,144
(,
- J. P. Knight, P-530 I. A. Peltier, 144 y
C. Thomas, 144 n
R. J. Bosnak~, P-924 R. A. Birkel, 147 S. S. Pawlicki, P-1000 R. A. Benedict,147 I. Sibweil, P-1022 S. B. Burwell, 147 R. L. Tedesco, P-822 J. C. Glynn, P-822 f-1. M. M1ynczak, 147
['
- 11. Rood, 147 C. G. Long, P-822 J. C. Snell, 147 V. Benaroya, P-822 D. L. Tibbitts,147 e
G. Iainas, P-904 A. Bournia, 128 g
T. A. Ippolito, P-722 T. H. Cox, 128 G
F. Basa, P-822 A. W. Dromerick,128 3;
D. f. Ross, P-1030 E. A. Licitra, 128 6,i R. il, Ireland, P-1030
[
h r3 EE M IM M eME
f D
O'
~
DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files June 5, 1978 11LIDF/CDJtt fDR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations FPGl E. G. Case, Chairman, Regulatory f<equirenants Review Co mittec SUSJECT
- SUtnW OF RMJLA'IURY RECOIREEIE:.T5 RINIDf COMITPEE FILTIuG HO. 74, MY 16,1978 he Cccuittee reviewed:
1.
Proposed Revision 1 to Ibgulatory Guide 1.68.2 " INITIAL STARIUP TEST PRC3PRI TO DEPQbME RDUIE SHUIUkW CAPABILITY FOR WATSR CO3 LED NUCLEAR P0n~dR PIATI3" dated Decerber 23, 1977, and recocnended approval.
Se Cornittee reaffirmed for this proposed revision its previous categorization (see Meeting No. 54) of the January 1977 version of tlas guide as follows:
Catecory 3 - Backfit recuired for ooerating license aoplications now
(_
unaer review.
l l
Category 2 - Further staff consideration of individual cases required l
in oroer to determine the need for backfitting for all operating reactors.
A 2.
Proposed SPANDARD RADIOID3ICAL EFFIUDTP TEQiNICAL SPECIFICATIONS for Sn'Rs and PWRs dated January 31, 1978, and recocnended approval subject to the following cocments:
a.
me model technical specifications should be revised to include guidance in implementing 40 CFR Part 190.
b.
We AIF Task Pcree and other merbers of the punlic should be provided with copies of the proposed technical specifications and cernants invited.
q c.
All operating reactors should be assessed against these proposed
/(
technical specifications on a schedule to be established by the staff.
g d.
ne proposed technical specifications should be used for operath license reviews beginning with ficGuire Unit 1 scheduled for ch g in Decercer 19 A
-}
RRRC RRRC
-~
o
>c =
- e Svarga/m E
e
~
6/5/7 6/5/78
~ ~ '
NRC FORM 318 (p.76) NRCM 0240 W u. s. aovannwswv enswv we orrica iers -eas.eae
][htkh 3 p ^
m
.n-
~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - -
,,wfs 4
n:M.;&a$ijpf'+6 "; *... ?.,. ~~ 3 ;%:.
, e-i m.,,.
M:;
- -T,.
0:.hsl '
l
- g.:;u,n~
/
Q
- 4 I
A7.G, anc will continue discumsions at Meeting flo. 75.
4.
Proposed Regulatory Guido 1.68.X (RS 709-4) "Pid:OPEFATIO AL TESTIliG OF INSTIGEt4T N3D CGmOL AIR SY572DG" date51 January 19, 1978, and referred it back to the staff for additional considerations concerning the proposed implesentation.
y Tne Comittee rude specific note of the need for icerove:ents in the general quality of inpact/value assess:aents with
}
particular need for clarity and consistency in iglementation reco:rondations.
Draft Regulatory Guide 1.56 "MdNrENNiC5 OP h'ATER PURITY IN BOILI?G 5.
h". DER PEA T.RS", Ret 1, dated January 26, 1978, and recomerded approval.
h Comittee chsracteri::ed this draft guido as Category 3 - Backfit required for plants in operating license review ano tor operating reactors.
W Ccra:iittee eq;tasized its previous point of i:: proving tne quality of value/i::: pact and ir:cler.entation assessments.
Item 2 of the agenda was withdrawn by tne originator.
~~
,,,1 g d B1' j
.'G W Edson G. Case, Chairman gyI'[e' Regulatory Requirements Review Conraittee
,g
.c v1 CCS:
See next page
?s b
=
d
- )
~
-4 d
4 e
+-
6 i 6
6 2
s11.
..e-
.A'[A 1Ci M,
a,
i i i:
- y ~:..
9 l'
t' i
A S
SURNAME F SATE M VRC FORM D80 N 7@
---A-
m.--_
/_
/
a[
shuQ L. V. Gossick, o209 tNBd Z. R. Rosztoczy, P-1030 N. Villalva,128 E. G. Case, P-428 P. S. Check, P-1114 S. Miner,128 J. D. Saltzman', P-415 T. M. N vak, P-ll32 R. Stright,128 R. S. Boyd, 278 H. R. Denton, P-202 W. F. Kane, 116 R. C. DeYoung, 278 D. M. Muller, P-202 M. D. Lynch, 116 L. P. Crocker, 278 F. Miraglia, P-202 C. W. Moon, 116
~
D. B. Vassallo, 110 W. P. Ga:m1111, P-328 H. Silver,116 l
J. F. Stolz,144 J. C. Stepp, P-314 C. R. Stahle, 116 K. Kniel, 147 L. G. Hulman, P-214 J. N. Wilson,116 I
O. D. Parr, 128 W. E. Kreger, P-712 D. S. Hood, 116 S. A. Varga, 116 M. L. Ernst, P-302 R. Naventi,116 R. P. Denise, 266 B. J. Youngblood, P-302 J. Riesland, EW-359 T. P. Speis, 268 R. L. Ballard P-234 E. Hill, NL-5650 D. J. Skovholt, 266 R. H. Vollmer,, P-514 A. A. Johnson C. J. Heltemes, P-320 D. F. Bunch, P-608 R. W. Houston, 242 J. Collins, P-730 P. F. Collins, 357 V. A. Moore, P-518 V. Stello, 528 G. W. Knighton, P-528 J. W. Reece, 528 W. H. Regan, P-522 L. R. Nichols, 528 T. E. Murley, 1130SS J. T. Telford, 528 N. C. Moseley, EW-359 B. Grimes, 340 H. D. Thornburg, EW-359
~
A. Schwencer, 316 E. Volgenau, EW-359 D. L. Ziemann, 542 S. Levine, ll30SS G. Lear, 338 R. B. Minogue, NL-5650 R. W. Reid, 330 G. A. Arlotto, NL-5650 J. R. tliller, 216 M. Kehnemuyi, NL-5650 R. A. Clark, 22d R. M. Bernero, NIe5650 J. M. Elliott, 216 R. G. Smith, NL-5650 D. G. Eisenhut, 542 T. C. Roberts, NL-5650 W. Butler, 416 M. Grossrun, 9604 MNBB R. Baer, 516 S. H. Hanauer, 6211, MNBB L. C. Shao, 440 T. Rehm, 6209 MNBB R. J. Mattson, P-1102 D. P. Allison, 144 F. Schroeder, P-1102 J* ^"9810'144 W. Minners, P-1102 L. Engle, 144 W. Haass, P-1102 L. L. Kintner,144 J. P. Knight, P-530 I. A. Peltier, 144 R. J. Bosnak, P-924 C. Thomas, 144 S. S. Pawlicki, P-1000 R. A. Birkel, 147 I. Sihweil, P-1022 R. A. Benedict,147 R. L. Tedesco, P-822 S. B. Burwell, 147 J. C. Glynn, P-822 M. M. Mlynczak, 147 C. G. Long, P-822 H. Rood, 147 V. Benaroya, P-822 J. C. Snell,147 G. Lainas, P-904 D. L. Tibbitts, 147 T. A. Ippolito, P-722 A. Bournia,128 F. Rosa, P-822 T. H. Cox, 128 D. F. Ross, P-1030 A. W. Dromerick,128 R. E. Ireland, P-1030 E. A. Licitra, 128 E. G. Adensam, 238 l
er*
DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files August 24, 1978 l
MEMORANDUM FOR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations FROM E. G. Case, Chairman, Regulat,ory Requirements Review Cocnittee SUBJECT
- SumARY OF REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW COMITTEE PIETING NO. 77, AUGUST 2,1978.
l The Cocnittee reviewed:
l 1.
ATWS, and while generally concurring with the staff's_ technical assessment cf this issue, requested additional specificity with regard to the implementation reconnendations proposed by the staff (both backfit and I
frontfit) before a Comittee recocnendation is made. In paPticular, the i
Connittee suggested that serious consideration be given to a two-phase (i.e. short term and long tem) implementation plan and schedule.
The Cocnittee also suggested that consideration be given to augmentation f
of the value-impact analysis in support of the revised implementation re::ocnendations.
l 2.
Proposed Amendment to 10 CFR Part 50.55a
" CODES AND STANDARDS" dated I
June 22, 1978, and reconenended approval.
~
The third item on the agenda was deferred to the next meeting.
The fourth item on the agenda was wit $ drawn tiy the originator.
Origiulsped W L L Sue.
Edson G. Case, Chairman
/
Regulatory Requirements Review Comunittee
')}pf 0v cCs:
See next page 3
34 nane anac
. r,.. s.
~
.m a. s,. _ 3/a/ms ECase
/
(78 8/24/78 oavs>
NRCPORM 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240 W un s. oovanmuswv paswvine orre.as sore-essend
[
l
_~ n -
e m
~
(
k.
k'2,,,o Q
.7 Y
DISTRIBUTION:
\\
/ "
,s.
Central Files I
MEMORANDUM FOR: Lae V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations
(
FROM:
E. G. Case, Chairman, Regulatory Requirements Review Comittee d
SUBJECTi SumARY OF REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NO. 79, OCTOBER 19, 1978 The Comittee reviewed:
1.
Draft R.G. 1.XXX, " CRITERIA FOR ELECTRIC, INSTRU ENTATION & CONTROL PORTIONS OF SAFETY SYSTEMS" (SD TASK RS 609-5) dated April 11, 1978, and Supplementary Information dated July 24, 1978, and returned it to the staff for rework and resubmittal with the following comments:
a.
The recommendation for implementation should be considerably more explicit and definitive than presented. The Committee emphasized that backfit recomendations must consider and be '
appropriately tailored to the various classes of plants and applications (i.e. operating reactors, post CP plants, and CP and OL application in review as well as standard plant designs) and must be accompanied by supportive value/ impact analyses.
~
b.
The Committee. believes the new procedures for public coment should be followed prior to the return of this draft proposed guide for Comittee _ review..
~
f 2.
Proposed Revision to the Standard Review Plan:
Section 13.1 & 13.4 a
- MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT ORGANIZATION".and "0PERATIONAL i
REVIEW" dated May 12, 1978, and recomended approval with the following comments.
a.
The manpower estimates of paragraphs I.C and I.C.2 of the value/
impact statement should be clarified as well as the last sentence of paragraph I.C.2.
The revised value/ impact statement is to be ~
. included with the agenda material to be made publicly available.
b.
The implementation schedule should be included in the revision
/
I to the Standard Review Plan. The Comittee characterized this j
~
Category 1 - No backfit.
f n 4 -.. < a,,.
n e-
-i,ym i p wa ch{
(
- '>J t
ornes >
o DATE M
- = *7 mc posu m (9.m mcw 02a
--'a=***'=
E,..h
_ w;iM@3digpgmr3p%gv p:
an y-7,~ +r, 6 w
$b a b
.g.':7;a :
rg
'g;r Q
kV
- ~ - -
c s
Lee V. Gossick 3.
Proposed R.G.1 XX (RS 035-2), " AUDITING 0F QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAP.S FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS" dated May 26, 1978, and recomended approval.
The Comittee characterized this guide as:
Catecory 1 - No backfit.
4.
Req'uest for Review of Proposed Branch Technical Position, ETSB 11-4, dated June 13, 1978, and recomended approval subject to the following coments:
In Table 1 of the proposed BTP, the design criteria for Group A a.
items should be clarified and.the specific engineered safety features (ESF) requiring actuation should be itemized and their design criteria appropriately referenced.
b.
Consideration should be ~given to publishing thJs guidance as an Appendix to the appropriate SRP rather than as a BTP.
Consistent with the Comittee characterization of this proposed c.
BTP as:
rL Category 1 - No backfit, the specific implementation schedule for future applicability should be included in the i
position as published in the SRP.
d.
The value/ impact assessment should be strengthened as discussed,.'
and the amended assessment furnished to the Comittee for distibution
. with the agenda material.
../
~
!.p 7
l 5.
Draft C, R'e'v71 of R.G.1.132, " SITE INVESTIGATIONS FOR FOUNDATIONS :
i 0F NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
- dated July 18,1978, and reconsnended approval.
The Comittee characterized this guide as:
\\
Category 1 - No backfit, recognizing' that the provisions of this guide
\\
will also be applicable to any new investigations perfomed after the effective date of the guide at sites where construction (2 permits have already been granted.
@ gped B1 E. G. Can /
Edson G. Case, Chairman Regulatory Requirements Review Committee cc: See attached page n
..RRR DI
. ~. -
[.. '. gc : t.1..b.......E
.1../...8..........
.1.1../.*./..78........'....~.....'..............................,...... '...............
3 enc samu 3as (s.u[reu:u 02m
- u. '.* =- :
n.= sun
-n.
(
?
(
g, m.,
zp Q"
W c'
es DISTRIBUTI'ON:
i Central Files Decinber 13, 1978 MEMORANDUM FOR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations FROM E. G. Case, Chairman, Regulatory Requirements Review Comittee x
SUBJECT
- SUM 4ARY OF REGULATORY REQUIREENTS REVIEW COM1ITTEE 9'-
MEETING $0. 80, NOVEMBER 21, 1978
- ~
The Comittee reviewed:
l.
Draft 1 of R.G. 8.JB, " RADIATION SAFETY TRAINING AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS" dated July 20, 1978, and while generally co'ncurring with the provisions of the proposed guide, referred it back to the staff for resubmittai with the following comments:
a.
The new procedures should be followed concerning solicitation and resolution of public coments prior to submittal to the Comittee.
b.
This -and all items submitted for. Comittee review'must be accompanied by backfit-reconnendations and supportive'value/ _.
impact analyses for the various clas~ses of. plants and applications, i.e. CP and OL reviews, post CP plants, and operating reactors. Particular attention should be given to recommendations concerning the applicability of the proposed-
,a,
guide to PDAs, PDAs in review, and applications referencing various standardization options. Where appropriate, the implementation section of guides.should indicate how standardized designs and applications referencing a standardized option are to be treated.
2.
DRAFT 1, REV.1 TO R.G.1.134,. "HEDICAL EVALUATION OF PERSONNEL REQUIRING OPERATOR LICENSES". dated October 18, 1978, and recommended approval.
o<
~
The Comittee categorized this proposed revision as Category 1 -
j No backfit, noting that the effective date shown in tfiFpi6pMed jl revision should be three months from the date of issuance of the i
guide..
fQ l
..t pi W Ul m E p 1
3 48 I
t,
.....n..a.5.y z, !
pc
.. a..
. ;.E.c
~........:..... '............. '.....
.y a.g.s...
1.1
..Q.8..
. 1 2 N.1 3 D.8.:
d........ :
...\\...........
.- e.
! mac roms ne o.u) us"cm ano v'
'an~*
==""*
a*
. I.
_m
/
i
(
T
(
X,
~
~
y g
g
- 3.
Draft 2 of R.G.1.104, Rev.1., "0VERHEAD CRANE HANDLING SYSTEMS FOR N'JCLEAR POWER PLANTS" dated August 30, 1978, and after extensive discussion, referred it back to the staff with the recomendation
. that the guide be withdrawn and the material issued as a NUREG.
information document.
4.
Proposed R.G.1.1XX, " FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION OF SAFETY-RELATED VALVE ASSEMBLIES IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS" dated September 11, 1978, and referred it back to the staff for resubmittal in accordance with the new procedures concerning public comments.
The Committee again emphasized the comment made in iten 1 above, concerning the need for backfit recommendations for the various classes-of plants and applications including the various standardization options.
c._
5.
Draft 2, Revision 2 to R.G.1.28 " QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM REQUIREf1ENTS (DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION)" dated Septenber 20, 1978, and recomended approval subject to the following comment:
-The implementation section should identify the appropriate exemptions a.
from the guide positions for standardized designs and applications referencing the various standardized options.
6.
Draft 1, Revision 3 of R.G.1.35, " INSERVICE INSPECTION OF UNGR00TED TENDONS IN PRESTRESED CONCRETE CONTAINENTS", and Draft 1, R.G.1.35.1, " DETERMINATION OF PRESTRESSING FORCES FOR INSPECTION OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CONTAINENTS" dated Septenber 26, 1978, and referred it back to the staff for resubmittal in accordance with the new procedures. Again the Comittee noted the need for backfit recommendations. and supporting value/ impact analyses for the various classes of plants including standardized designs and applications referencing various standardization options. Where appropriate, the implementation section of guides should indicate how standardized designs and applications referencing a standardized option are to be treated.
The Committee discussed the following items as to whether the changes
~
to these documents were such as to require full Comittee review:
7.
Proposed P.evisions to the Standard Review Plan:
Sections 17.1, " QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES," and 17.2, " QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING THE OPERATIONS PHASE", dated Septecter 15,1978, and concluded that the changes proposed were not substantive and did not require Committee review.
~
?
omcE *.
......................\\..
- /***.
SURMA MS P
...........g..
DATE M m
3 iac roux na o.m scu ouo' l
- J. =...
~ p= -" '= " " - ' " - ".
j g
./'
0:w~g.
w o
.../
q
- y. -.
8.
Proposed Revisions to the Standard Review Plan: Sections 14.1, 14.2, and 14.3 dated September 21, 1978, and concluded that with the exception of one item, personnel qualifications, the proposed changes were not' substantive and did not require Committee review.
It was left to the staff to determine what course of action to pursue to obtain full Committee review of the one substantive item proposed.
g 3iginal Sisd %'
L G. Cast /
Edson G. Case, Chairman Regulatory Requirements Review Committee i
CCs:
See next page i
a
~
s
. x.:.
._ e
.; 7 g _
,s e,
d n
9
.,rie s *
.u.==>
.....3,
..'.U.........
..rs >
....c..
unc ronu ne o.nyuncu oua,.
k u.........,., :..'...............
,,.; ?.
~
3.
o S
orsrp&n 3py 1 g 3979 ural Files Rdg Files MDt0RANDCUt FOR: Lee V. Gossicke Executive Director for Operations FRON:
Edson C. Case, Chairman Regulatory Requirements Review Cdamittee S02L7BCT:
StDGtART OF REGUZATORY REO[1ERDG3tTS REVIN COMMITTEE MEETING NO. 81, JANUARY 2, 1979 The rnamittee continue) its review of ANS, particularly Voltane 3 to MUREG 0460 dated December 1978, and reached the following
~
conclusions and recommandatfonst.
a..
The t%m=4ttee concurred in the overall approach used for developing staff remmannalations for resolving the ANS issue as set for*h in Etinc' 0460, Volums 3.
In particular, the rnamittee agreed with the use of enginmering judgment as the primary basis for rear htnst decisions on the ANS issue, with quantitative risk asseenennt used in a
~
supportive role.
,m. :..
- ,r.
.Ws!
.~ >
v o ;.,..f f,, b.,,...~ The Cbanittee rammmereen that,the following general
- a v. I, gX *,
,'., requiremente for ANS protection of LWR's he eetahl1mbed ME.g-%.a
~
- Qb,g ; gA
.by a motfoe"and 'comunat zu1==d'f arr
-+r ".f=< tEariy Operating Plants L )8;Q"*+y.;3"f: y;; '
,-p nd "i
.).
., ^
g, m,;, q,e
... m,. e c 7.
'qi~.,:c'.
w o
.Q.
- c '. g*
a n re t-f i = F"~.9 s
- L;'
- q. '.'
- .w q. s.s M2 i,
(1) '
-~
'. s.,
M 4--
D.
.e,..
.l'
_' f
- 4
.<y..pr.,
Provide as a minimum the modifloations of Alternative 2
- y
,",E,$,7. ~ i ~ y c,
., of EURBG 0460, Volume 3." a== of the unique -
..C 1
W s. T
".5} 'N. '.:
characteris' tics of these older 'and genera 11g==a11er facL11tieer plant unique an=1geen and revieuw should lOM,: ;
. be performed to determian the moeded additionaal ANS
/
4' preventica or mitigation festTree that ass'chet"
'I',... '.?
effective for. tbene plante La the context of the overal.1 s
- 0 f.;; $;', ~
. safety of thane' facilitise.
l-
'f e a:,s '+f(2)
.h>, $:
5-
)a
- ~
Other Operating Plants And Plants With Construction Pezmits L.o:: - u I/V
.s.
X..., a), ',... :.y,-
Issued Prior SO January le 1978 v~
P e
u~
p., 4..
,r,r, 2,r.%
}
J Provide.the dfismtimme of Alternative 3 of M 460, a.
o :
.:.( ul lH
- w l n d y 4 961ame 3a for al1 Tother operating plants vitb OL*a
. M
- s. ~T y
o p
. c,m F r r y 1+':,-PP. issued on or.before the 'effoctive date of the raie- &
j<
E g
%x*w., hv4 pf k.
_j
- g
- ss t
X 1
l$$N W,
.y ; ;;, n 0.e x.,h4 j j r* d h
y.h W er J ~ ~
3#
..n/k M..,.,1 ;= ~
- d. & W N t
w r
$q[?w 6 hfr?l
% h,cq
& :" *3 ? ",* %.. F. MN,,.
?.
.wI
' A
,T4 s
v#-
> ;3 -h+ m..
w ~ w " "* * *<.7 y,. : w r
["., ;) 'j,.p., W, 5. w.%v 1_ m w.~b;',
N'#M h '
(?
- s f
'. W b '
).*,,
rw
?
t
. ;. m v.
~
v
~
mgr{ ~l'<~;t~hk y'~ D:
3 s
~ - -
40 '2':2_ A
<~&-
If,
I 5
Zee V. Gossick
~2-(estimated to be January la 1980). A reasonable amount of time to accomplish the modifications should be allowed so as to ninimize down time.
It appears that 2 years should be sufficient.
b.
Provide the modifications of Alternative 3 of NUREG 0460, Volume 3, for plants currently under construction with CP's issued prior to January lo 1978. A reasonable amount of time to accomplish the modifications should be allowed. It appears that.2 years after the effective date of the rule o or before issuance of an operating license whichever r
is later shotid be aufficient.
s.
o (3)
Plants With Construction Permits Issued on Or After January 1,1978, New Plantm And Stn_Mant Plant Design o
~
Approvals
+'
a.
Provide the ac.difications of Alternative 4 of RUREG 0460, Volume 3o for plants with CP's issued
- on or after January 1,1978, but before the effective date of the rule. Based on the premise that the effective date of the rule will be no fy.:
~
1ater than January.1,1980, the modifications should -
+
.g be completed before theee' plants are issued an OL.'
d'h;[ ;?.4.'I N..
~
.',^ k!f M,.I[J.}( '-i.sd @
%i ','.with regard [to,those plaats wich CP,'s, issued oo ~ or;.'
s q.
',. f. -"
-@isi,T*'.i~;$.
r x.:.,'
after January lo 1978o' bat-which reference a stanmotan'd r
y,,
j'(h"
' f.*R or duplicate or which replicate a haee plant design.
approved prior to that date the Coannittee was evenly r
f...,f,,.
divided as to whether such^ plants should_ be required a
v'
- R.
to provide modifications of Alternative 3 or
? ;.,.
,. g.
Alternative 4 of,RURRG 0460, Volone. 3.
The Connaittee r m M=rt that the Directoro Office of Nuclear,. ;;
WY
.w;..
Reactor Regulation decide.this question.
s
.an.7
~.
, ]. 5 :
h.
Provide the modificatican of' Alternative 4 of RURBC 0460o 9\\olume 3r 1%i aew plants with CP's
- Mir -
' issued on or after the effective date of the rule.'
. V,'.*.R.
^
The modifications should be completed belfore thene u
- w..
- J..%...
plants are issued an OL. #._
^.
h[.;;q,. '.(>.'
- ~ -
9;[
_ 6,
. $. 9 3.,
,,..f
. V j,
a-*a.
5' h
AN
?*
w 9. ?
m p;,' ::vs,&s%, s 3,,
k,y4 cp-. %-
q o
n
,.<a i
c....
t 9"s jjsp y el --. f
. J y,p.'f c
.w y.d.>,
- w.a,,vy. T d
j 4
- mf,.
. 1i
.% ph
- h. 9 y!
- 6's,- ?.*g,+p
.]s e d,.
~
,g.
2n
% % ;T
.y s i
fM
.o. @ h L p.7'M.S@OSFm :3*,* R ~ k. C [-
b,I..
l
.>-a u* *
,4*J
,e ed,. c *E 4 r t ; 2 P-i, ? ' ?:f
.Y_
W
- ??,[ 'c.?l'*?
W TLN.^ NY W.
'\\
_., dL,, _ ~ ""~;T '( C'ty_* qt.yy' ' f_.5."'~.."***. 2
,6 t
s
+hy fsQ_44,f&__
~
O~
r..~.~
+
-f_
b
, e --- - -
Lee V. Gossick
~3-l c.
Standard Plant Design Approvals Provide the modifications of Alternative 4 of NUREG 0460, Volume 3, by amendment of all currently effective prn_14m4~ry reference design approvals.
Based ou the promise that the effective date of the L
rule wall be no later than January is 1980, the sodifications of all plants that reference these l
amended preifminary design approvals should be completed before these plants are issued an OL.
Provide-the modifications of Alternative 4 of
^
MUREG 0460o Voluee 3o for all new prel4atnary referonce design approvalsa for all final referarum design approvals that can be referenced in construction permit applications or that are associated with pre 11ssinary reference design approvals amended to provide the modifications of Alternative 4, for all preliminary duplicate plant e
design approvals and final duplicate plant design -
approvals that can be referenced in construction r.
permit applications and for all manufacturing licenses o
bj.
issued before the effective date of tho rule.
naman z, EQW
- on the punise that the effective date of the rule -
b Q*Ei:lJ'.....,
, will be no. inter,than asnaary la 1980s the sedifications
'%: TQ-W.
~.:P 3.. :
of all plants that reference these stanAnre plant';
'~~i Qp,~;S[ c 3. ~ ~ # ' design' appiovels should be ' completed before thees.P
~.
W.
~
plants"are issood an OLO '
~'
y n:W; < '
'=n-
> v.-
a.,,,
a
..,,s
.e
~. -
- -h J provide the modificatibas of Alternative 4 for-
\\
. ?..* 3
<y..
preiteinary reference design approvals and final
- p w
e
- ~ - ?*
~
f
.re erence design approvals that can be referenced in
^
construction permit appilaations, pr=14=4n=ry duplicate y^ ' '..,G
~ ~ plant design approvals and final duplicate plant designs 7;.
'J that can be referenced in,' construction permit applications,
.j;
~
'. ' ~
yw and manufacturing licenses issued on or after the J.
Q',
etfactive date of the rule." The modifications of all
\\,=,
plants that reference these_ standard plant design a
i.,4 h;Li, * *.Q approvals should be_ completed before thene plants are V
=
..,,, ~. ;.. F V 7
- issued an.' OL. ? 7",, &.,r&. N.
.v+,.a s.
e ;.,
~.'f, ~ &,' e h
%t;.h.O.i
%::2 l'
~
',-'i -
'J~;
4:
?
. 4.
.;. Og.x i 7,
s~->
.,s
- A s
f,,Edson Gj'Caseo Chairman
- mnegulatory Requirements Review
- * ' ^
.y M gggg~
m,, _ _
___o.-_
orrics >
- 1, - '%
'gggggg;gy.,
l; l
f4
~
~
- sunwaws >
_1/16/79 D ATa b
~
33 NRCFORM 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240
- us a. aovannwswv raswrime orricas sete = ese4a4 Y $5
_ = - -
,/ ' '
f O
s DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files
[
February 23, 1979 d
PEMORANDUM FOR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations
{
FROM E. G. Case, Chaiman, Regulatory Requirements I
Review Cocatttee SUBJECT
SUMMARY
OF REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW COMMITTEE 4
MEETING NO. 82, FEBRUARY 13, 1979 r
\\
The Cognittee reviewed:
s 1.
Information Paper for the Comnission on ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION MODELS FOR r
POTENTIAL ACCIDENT CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENTS AT NUCLEAR. POWER PLANTS dated l
November 29, 1978, and had the following comments:
The Committee reconnended approval of the proposed draft Regulatory a.
f Guide, " Atmospheric. Dispersion Model for Potential Accident Consequcnce i
Assessments at Nuclear Power Plants", included as Enclosure 1 to the t
infomation paper, subject to the following:
In Section D, Implementation:
(1) In the second paragraph on page 1.XXX-15 of the proposed Guide, f
the correct date of issuance of Standard Review Plan Section 2.3.4 should be used.
' ~ ~. '
g (2) The sentences beginning in line.360 and ena1.1g in line 365 should be deleted.
a u - >. r.
p n.,...,-
i (3) The same implementation requirements should be applied to u.
operating reactors as are applied to construction permit s
'm-1.,
~
applications tendered before the implementation date of the Guide and-to operating license applications whose con.
struction permits preceded the implementation date.
(4) The Division of Project Managewint should review this section
/
to assure consistency with the standardization policy and y,
i propose clarification, if appropriate.
pq
<)Oric W rM %' "g, 1
n l
~yav
- g 6,a :
1 1
orrecr y F'
SVarga/ms ECay 2/23/79 2/23/79 d
NRC F03U4 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240 A us s.oovenwissne r'aiwvins orrices sove ees.ead
' #6", %. agg,.
y;g.jp j. ;qy,
j
- 4. -
s--.
..n
.. ~_.
- l -
TE D
[~
'e f.l?
pg 2
d
, b.
Comittee concurrence on the information paper is not required nor appropriate. However, the information paper may indicate that the
+
I Comittee recomended approval of the proposed Guide subject to i
?
l,
. comments.
\\
~,
2.
The Comittee heard a presentation by members of the Division of Systems 5
Safety regarding a new method of considering common-mode failures, diversity, and defense-in-depth in the review of electrical and instru:aantation systems which was developed in the review of the integrated protection system for RESAR-414 and is being considered for generic application to other novel designs of this type. The Cocynittee comended the staff for its excellent presentation and for its l
initiative in explori~ng possible new regulatory approaches that can F
improve both safety and efficiency as the technology advances.
~
The Director, Division of System's Safety noted that before the new approach would be implemented as standard practice or applied to other than novel system designs, a formal reconsnendation would be sought t
from tiie Comittee.
(
A copy of the viewgraphs presented during the discussion will be distributed to
(
supplement the agenda material.
).. [:.[ ^ '
crip:15P4 y/
Edson G. Case, Chairman
.a > -
Regulatory Requirements Review Committee ces:
E See next page b
_f p
g ernc= *
.. = =
- 1
..r= >
Nec roux ns (9.m nacw oza
=
' = = " " - ' " ".
h
2rw a.
m u a_ a
~*
- s.-_..~
/'
o o
'/
F Di stribution:
S. H. Hanauer, P-822 A. W. Dromerick,128 L. V. Gossick, 6209 MNBB R. Satterfield, P-822 E. A. Licitra, 128 E. G. Case, P-428 D. F. Bunch, P-428 R. Trevino, 128 J. D. Saltzman, P-415 L. Rubenstein, P-428 R. Capra,128 1
R. S. Boyd, 278 D. F. Ross, 278 S. Miner,128 I
V. Stello, 528 R. J. Mattson, P-1102 R. E. Ireland, P-1030 R. Stright,128 Z. R. Rosztoczy, P-1030 S. A. Varga,116 T. E. Murley,1130 SS K. Kniel, P-lll4 M. D. Lynch, 116 N. C. Moseley,,EW-359 T. M. Novak, P-ll32, C. W. Moon, 116 H. D. Thornburg, EW-359 D. M. Muller, P-202 H. Sil ver,116 R. C. DeYoung, P-202 F. Mi raglia, P-202 C. R. Stahle, 116 L. P. Crocker, 278 W. P. Gamill, 266 J. N. Wilson, 116 D. B. Vassallo,110 J. C. Stepp, P-314 D. S. Hood, 116 R. P. Denise, P-328 L. G. Hulman, P-214 C. J. Heltemes, 242 T. P. Speis, 268 W. E. Kreger, P-712 W. P. Kane, 242 D. J. Skovholt, 266 M. L. Ernst, P-302 J. C. Snell, 242
+
W. P. Haass, P-320
- 3. J. Youngblood, P-302 N. Villalva, 242 l'.
R. W. Houston, 242 R. L. Ballard, P-530 T. Cox, 242 P. F.. Collins, 357 R. H. Vollmer, P-514 P. O 'Reilly, 242 J. W. Reece, 528 J. G. Davis, EW-359 J. Conran, 242 L. R. Nichol s, 528 J. Collins, P-730 J. Riesland, EW-359 J. T. Telford, 528 V. A. Moore, P-518 E. Hill, NL-5650 t
B. K. Grimes, 340 A. Schwencer, 316 W. H. Regan, P-522 NRC PDR S. Levine,1130S5 D. L. Ziemann, 542 R. B. Minogue, NL-5650
^
G. Lear, P-338 G. A. Arlotto, NL-5650
- G. W. Knighton, 238 W. F. Anderson, NL-5650 R. W. Reid, 330 E. M. Morrison, NL-5650 V. Noonan, 440 J. R. Miller, P-216 J. A. Norberg, NL-5650 E. S. Christenbury, 9604 MNBB R. A. C1 ark, 228 h;-
D. G. Eisenhut, 542 T. Rehm, 6209 MNBB W. Butler, P-904 J. F. Stolz,144 g
L. 'C. Shao,1130 SS
- 0. P. Allison, 144 g,.; )
F. Schroeder, P-1102 J. Angelo,144 4
W. Minners, P-1102 L. Engle,144 L. L. Kintner, 144
[
J. P. Kr.ight, P-932
- 1. A. Peltier, 144 R. J. Bosnak, P-924 S. S. Pawlicki, P-1000 C. Thor,a s, 144 R. L. Baer,147 I. Sihweil, P-1022 i:
R. A. Birkel,147 R. L. Tedesco,P-1030 R. A. Benedict,147 J. C. Glynn, P-822 S. B. Burwell,147 r.
C. G. Long, P-822 H. Rood,147 V. Benaroya, P-822 D. L. Tibbitts, 147 j
G. Lainas, 416
- 0. D. Parr,128 T. A. Ippolito, 338 A. Bournia,128 F. Rosa, P-822 I'.
I.
A 44,mp".
j
{
g 3
8 "4