ML20133F997
| ML20133F997 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/22/1985 |
| From: | James Shea NRC OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS (OIP) |
| To: | Thorne C ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20133F967 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-96-398 NUDOCS 9701150091 | |
| Download: ML20133F997 (1) | |
Text
_ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . . _ . . . _ . . _ _ _ _. . - _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . . . _ - _ . _ _
- & La%q >
4 UNITED STATES N NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{ ,I
, WASHINGTON, D, C. 20555
- "%,..../
l J
Mr. Carl Thorne, Director Division of Politico-Military Security Affairs Office of International Security Affairs U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585
Dear Mr. Thorne:
With reference to the various communications between the NRC and DOE staffs concerning the proposed transfers of U.S.-origin nuclear power plant technology to the People's Republic of China pursuant to 10 CFR Part 810, this 1 is to advise you that the Commission notes, without objection, DOE's staff's 4
plan (with the concurrence of the Department of State) to recomend that the
-Secretary of Energy authorize the transfers identified in the attachment to ,
) State's August 2 letter to you. l 0
l l Commissioner Asselstine notes that the Executive Branch has failed to provide the NRC with a written statement of overall U.S. policy guidelines with ,
respect to proposed transfers to the People's Republic of China of 1
( non-sensitive U.S.-origin nuclear power technology pursuant to 10 CFR Part i 810. He believes that such transfers should not be approved until i Congressional consideration of the proposed U.S./PRC Agreement for Cooperation
} is completed and that Agreement becomes effective.
Sincerely,
-AL h k &
) mes R. Shea, Director Office of International Programs I
4 1
i 9701150091 970103 /J PDR FOIA 77 STROBEL96-398 PDR
S Unplanned Auto Scrams / 7000 Hrs Performance Indicator is a 3 Year Rolling Average 4 ,
- Median = 0.9 (9/96) 3 -
- Unit 1 = 1.75 (9/96) j -
l Unit 2 = 0.60 (9/96) 8 :
k s2 -
i
-+ -e
{ f E .N l
0 S -
A x
- A 1 - --
. ,++o 0
6/93 9/93 12/93 3/94 6/94 9/94 12/94 3/95 6/95 9/95 12/95 3/96 6/96 9/96 12/96 Indicator-3 Year Rolling Average ,
Ind. Median Unit 1 Unit 2 6
h lo m 2 ,,,,,,,,_
P Unplanned Auto Scrams -
Unit 1 i
A 3 .
. r i
. l
- 2 -
l Ei i
.o ; <
E i
- s :
z :
i l
1 t
i
- i
- i
, . i , . , , i i , i i , ; i . , , , . ! , , ! , i o
6/93 9/93 12/93 3/94 6/94 9/94 12/94 3/95 6/95 9/95 12/95 3/96 6/96 9/96 12/96 Monthly Values l
E Automatic Scrams l i Enclosure 2 ,
e Unplanned Capability Loss Factor Performance Indicator is a 3 Year Rolling Average t
l 30 .
Median = 6.0 (9/96) : Year End Performance 25 -
Unit 1 = 5.6 (9/96) : 5.8 (1995) i 20 -
Unit 2 = 9.0 (9/96) l 4.4 (1996)
C :
as 8 15 i
E ? ? ?
10 -
~
. 4$ Q
= ~ . ~ C 5 __. . -
- -e 0
6/93 9/93 12/93 3/94 6/94 9/94 12/94 3/95 6/95 9/95 12/95 3/96 6/96 9/96 12/96 Indicator - 3 Year Rolling Average Ind. Median Unit 1 Unit 2
- ?
l Enclosure 2 ...-.---
Non-Outage Corrective MWO's 1000 900 -
p 800 s
g 700 600 -
o y 445 N 400 -
377 2 341 327 321 0 300 -
45 0
12/95 1/96 2/96 3/96 4/96 5/96 6/96 7/96 8/96 9/96 10/96 11/96 Monthly Values for Last 12 Months E Open MWOs B Available for Work D1 closure 2
Overdue Preventative MWO's Periodic / Planned / Predictive Maintenance 5
4 -
8 s:
1 23 -
E s 2 -
0 o
1 0
12/95 1/96 2/96 3/96 4/96 5/96 6/96 7/96 8/96 9/9G 10/96 11/96 Monthly Valcas for Last 12 Months PMs are considered overdue if they are not completed within the grace period of the originally scheduled date.
Enclosure 2 --
Unplanned Auto Scrams -
Unit 2 i
3 . ;
2 -
b !
.o : .
- E
6 :s .
i l Z .
i
! 1 l !
- i
- i l
g i . , , , i . . ! , , i , . i . : ii..i. . .
. . . . i ;
6/93 9/93 12/93 3/94 6/94 9/94 12/94 3/95 6/95 9/95 12/95 3/96 6/96 9/96 12/96 [
Monthly Values t
E Automatic Scrams l Enclosure 2
-..-..--