ML20133F997
| ML20133F997 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/22/1985 |
| From: | James Shea NRC OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS (OIP) |
| To: | Thorne C ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20133F967 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-96-398 NUDOCS 9701150091 | |
| Download: ML20133F997 (1) | |
Text
_ _ _. _ _ _. _.
& La%q 4
UNITED STATES N
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{
,I WASHINGTON, D, C. 20555
"%,..../
l J
Mr. Carl Thorne, Director Division of Politico-Military Security Affairs Office of International Security Affairs U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585
Dear Mr. Thorne:
With reference to the various communications between the NRC and DOE staffs concerning the proposed transfers of U.S.-origin nuclear power plant technology to the People's Republic of China pursuant to 10 CFR Part 810, this 1
is to advise you that the Commission notes, without objection, DOE's staff's plan (with the concurrence of the Department of State) to recomend that the 4
-Secretary of Energy authorize the transfers identified in the attachment to
)
State's August 2 letter to you.
0 l
l Commissioner Asselstine notes that the Executive Branch has failed to provide the NRC with a written statement of overall U.S. policy guidelines with respect to proposed transfers to the People's Republic of China of 1
(
non-sensitive U.S.-origin nuclear power technology pursuant to 10 CFR Part i
810. He believes that such transfers should not be approved until i
Congressional consideration of the proposed U.S./PRC Agreement for Cooperation
}
is completed and that Agreement becomes effective.
Sincerely,
-AL h k &
)
mes R. Shea, Director Office of International Programs I
4 1
i 9701150091 970103
/J PDR FOIA 77 STROBEL96-398 PDR
S i
Unplanned Auto Scrams / 7000 Hrs l
Performance Indicator is a 3 Year Rolling Average 4
Median = 0.9 (9/96)
Unit 1 = 1.75 (9/96) 3 j
l Unit 2 = 0.60 (9/96) 8 k
i s2
{
f
-+ -e E
.N.
l 0
S x
A 1
A
,++o 0
6/93 9/93 12/93 3/94 6/94 9/94 12/94 3/95 6/95 9/95 12/95 3/96 6/96 9/96 12/96 Indicator-3 Year Rolling Average Ind. Median Unit 1 Unit 2 l
6 h lo m 2
P Unplanned Auto Scrams
- Unit 1 i
A I
3 I
r i
l 2
l Ei i
.o E
i
- s z
i 1
l t
i l
i i
i i
i i
- i.,
o
. i i
6/93 9/93 12/93 3/94 6/94 9/94 12/94 3/95 6/95 9/95 12/95 3/96 6/96 9/96 12/96 Monthly Values i
l E Automatic Scrams l i
e Unplanned Capability Loss Factor Performance Indicator is a 3 Year Rolling Average t
l 30 Median = 6.0 (9/96)
Year End Performance 25 Unit 1 = 5.6 (9/96) 5.8 (1995) i 20 Unit 2 = 9.0 (9/96) l 4.4 (1996)
C as 8 15 i
E
?
?
?
10 4$ Q C
~
=
~
~
5
- -e 0
6/93 9/93 12/93 3/94 6/94 9/94 12/94 3/95 6/95 9/95 12/95 3/96 6/96 9/96 12/96 Indicator - 3 Year Rolling Average Ind. Median Unit 1 Unit 2
?
l
Non-Outage Corrective MWO's j
1000 900 p 800 s
g 700 600 o
y 445 N 400 377 2
341 327 321 0 300 45 0
12/95 1/96 2/96 3/96 4/96 5/96 6/96 7/96 8/96 9/96 10/96 11/96 Monthly Values for Last 12 Months E Open MWOs B Available for Work D1 closure 2
t Overdue Preventative MWO's Periodic / Planned / Predictive Maintenance 5
4 8
s:1 23 E
s 2
0 o
i 1
0 12/95 1/96 2/96 3/96 4/96 5/96 6/96 7/96 8/96 9/9G 10/96 11/96 Monthly Valcas for Last 12 Months PMs are considered overdue if they are not completed within the grace period of the originally scheduled date. --
Unplanned Auto Scrams
- Unit 2 i
3 2
b
.o E
6
- s i
l Z
i 1
l i
i l
i i
i i
ii..i.
. i g
6/93 9/93 12/93 3/94 6/94 9/94 12/94 3/95 6/95 9/95 12/95 3/96 6/96 9/96 12/96
[
Monthly Values i
t E Automatic Scrams l f
-..-..--