ML20133B271

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Monthly Trend Rept for Oct 1996
ML20133B271
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River 
Issue date: 10/31/1996
From:
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20133B275 List:
References
NUDOCS 9701030064
Download: ML20133B271 (27)
v • d • e


Text

.

.i "i

I i

i Crystal River Unit 3 i

i Monthly Trend Report 1

October 1996 i

i

'M' 288M 3%a88ao2 l

R l

eon

_ _ - ~_

v MONTHLY TREND REPORT Table of Contents t

Title Page

SUMMARY

HUMAN PERFORMANCE Human Performance Success Index.........................................

1 Precursors Awaiting Resolution...........................................

2 Component not in Expected Position........................................

3 Comments Awaiting Procedure Revision 4

Problem Report Corrective Action Steps.....................................

5 i

NOE Open REA's 6

NPTS Open REA's 7

REGULATORY PERFORMANCE CR-3 Violatio ns vs. Region II............................................. 8 Ra tio o f NCV's to To tal Viola tions..........................................

9 Licensee Event Reports (LER's)...........................................

10 t

PL ANT PRODUCTION AND RELIABILITY Thermal Perfo rma nc e................................................ 11 Contaminated External Leakers........................................... 12 l

Core Contaminated Floor Space........................................... 13 Total Radioactive Waste Generated......................................... 14 l

Degraded Equipment Work Request Backlog...................................

15

(

Corrective Maintenance Work Request Backlog................................... 16 Repea t Mai ntena nc e................................................

17 Overdue Control Sheets (CS) & Instrument Calibrations (IC)............................

18 Te mpo ra ry Mo difica tio ns.............................................. 19 MAR Clo s u re s.................................................... 20 1

1 r

SUMMARY

\\

The CR-3 MonthlyTrend Report for October is attached. This summary contains comments on various charts, such as sudden changes, i

adverse trends, positive comments, and additions or deletions. If you have any comments or suggestions, please contact Rodney Thompson at extension 3396.

Page 1 (Human Performance Success Index) - The index rose due to the decrease in the number of" occurrences"(Problem Reports

& Precursor Cards) and an increase in the number of opportunities (hours worked) during October. NSAT will be evaluating this indicator i

and revising it as necessary to reflect the new corrective action process now in place. The past indicators showing causes and condition codes have been dropped. New indicators will be considered as sufficient coding data is collected under the new process.

i Page 2 (Precursors Awaiting Resolution)-The backlog showed a significant decrease in October due to a strong focused effort by all departments to close precursor cards, especially Engineering. A list of open Precursor Cards was mailed with a cover memo to all affected Directors, Managers, and Supervisors on 9/6/96 in order to raise the level of awareness towards this trend. This appears to have been effective, but a strong effort must still be made to address the older Precursor Cards.

I Page 3 (Component Not in Expected Position)- There were ZERO instances of components found in an unexpected position during the month of October. This improvement is directly attributed to the recent implementation of concurrent verification for all manipulations.

[

Other contributing factors are procedure writers watching for conflicts in valve positions between procedures, and the increased l

accountability for use or non-use of STAR by individuals.

i Page 5 (Problem Report Corrective Action Steps)- 1 his indicator has been revised to track the number of steps overdue at the end of i

the month as well as the number of steps extended during the month. The goal for overdue steps is zero. The numbers have increased

)

significantly. A strong effort must be made to address the open steps on past Problem Reports as we transition to the new corrective action process.

Page 7 (NPTS Open REA's)- This indicator was added by Engineering to reflect the trend of REA's for which NPTS is responsible. This i

was not captured in the past REA indicator which only reflected those REA's residing with the design engineering group.

i t

. [

i i

r' Page 17 (Repeat Maintenance) - A new data point trended on this indicator shows the percentage of work requests that planners have identified as " degraded" that are also identified as Repeat Maintenance. This indicator is not the same as repetitive failures under the Maintenance Rule. This indicator is more broad based, looking at component level rework. Repetitive failures under the Maintenance i

Rule are only those failures that result in a loss of system or train level function. NSAT is working with Engineering to develop

[

performance indicators related to the Maintenance Rule.

Maintenance Shop Schedule Performance Indicator-This indicator has been discontinued until startup. It is currently being redefined i

due to changes in the preparation and implementation of the work process at CR-3. New indicators are being developed and are i

expected to be in the 1997 trend reports.

J. S. Baumstark l

I 1

e

[

t I

r l

t

--.m.

m

.m-

-'"-+-

_r-.r.,_,

g

.we+

a a

u.

4 4

~

u

-a'.

5.*-A a-+1 A

A 9

1 1

s j

I l

I f

e a

j 3

1

f...

9 8

k I

t J.

i.,'

t'

?

i

,'e' r..u.,

e.-

,,+" ' i^

,j,d,,,,

s 4

T 1

i

(

J f

d J

-. - -.... -. -. - _. -. -.. -. ~...

i

. CR-3 RAonthly Perfonnance Trend - October 1998 <

- ~w

~

I" **

. Human Performance Success Index f

Jan. - 8.836

~

Feb. - 8.846 ea Mar. - B.591 9e Apr. - 9.118

,4 May - 9.318 i

Jun. - 8.967 9.2 7,,,,,,,,,

Jul. - 8.739

'8 Aug.- 8.277 l

8*i Sep. - 8.728 l

~

Oct. - 9.560 l

8.6.

4

~

Nov.

l

,,~

Dec.

i j

8.2 '

.- 8 '

---+---------a w

. p e,

. umr '

.p

% 1 M

g E' 4 sep!

fout1

' n.

' Dec L.

l Dennison of Ste Perfonstance Indicator This indicator is a measure of the number of human performance events (Problem Reports and Precursor Cards with cause/ condition codes that fall into the human

[

, performance category), divided by the numt:er of opportunities for events to occur (number of hours worked), and normalized to fit a 1 - 10 scale on the chart.

i e

Personsionee esseeurement / Goal.-

7 The target is to achieve and maintain the success index > 9.

AnotyeioISummary During October, there were 61 occurrences designated as " Human Performance"(down from 107 !ast month), of which 19 were Problem Reports (down from 29 last i

month). The index rose due to the decrease in the number of " occurrences" (Problem Reports & Precursor Cards) and an increase in the number of opportunities (hours f

worked) during October. There were no Problem Reports under Human Performance in October with a Severity Level assigned.

I

' NSAT wit be looking closely at this indicator to determine how to best trend " Human Performance"in 1997, now that the new procedure (CP-111) has been issued and f

the new corrective action process has been implemented. The old chart for " human performance condition codes" has been dropped. As the new system of coding l

progresses and sufficient data is received, new trending charts will be considered.

t l

Responsible:

R. L Thompson, Senior Mh QA Engineer Page:

1-l Data Collected By:

Gayle Widell, Sesoty Aeosssment W J

- CR-3 Monthly Perforrnance Trend - October 1998 l

c-I Backloa

. Precursors Awaiting Resolution a

senued i-- 1 chie.d open necedog A^

Jan. - 457 Feb.- 584 Mar. - 751 1000 Apr. - 880 l

900 -

'744 ' ~

800-May - 839 l

700 Jun.- 814 600 Jul. - 857 I

r 400 m

[

Aug. - 908 500

~~-

t w

Sep. - 952 g.

~

Oct. - 744 200-

-=

100.

=

Nov.

~

Dec.

0-

~

l

'Dec Jan

'Feb.

- Mer

~ Apr ;

Mey; lJun1 1J61 ?

-Aug~

Sep?

Oct -

Novf Deci Dennidon of tie Perfonnance indsetor rt This indicator tracks the number of Precursor Cards issued each month, the number of cards closed each month, and the number of open " backlog" cards. It also shows the number of open Precursor Cards greater than 30 days old in the " Analysis /Sumraary" below.

p Perfannonce Reseenarennent/ Goal -

An open backlog target of < 300 has been established for 1996. The target was chosen based on average number of precursor cards issued per month in 1995.

Analysie / Surnanary x

Tha backlog showed a significant decrease in October due to a strong focused effort by all departments to close their precursor cards, especially Engineering. The number of PC's greater than 30 days old rose to 75% of the total. 74% of these (394) are in the Engineering area. A list of open Precursor Cards was mailed with a cover memo to all affected Directors, Managers, and Supervisors on 9/6/96 in order to raise the level of awareness towards this trend. This appears to have been

[

effective, but a strong effort must still be made to address the older Precursor Cards.

OPEN BACKLOG THAT IS GREATER THAN 30 DAYS OLD:

l L

(

January-208 of 457 = 46%

July,

531 of 857 = 62%

February - 256 of 584 = 44%

August 592 of 908 = 65%

t March 314 of 751 = 42%

September - 582 of 952 = 61%

i April 525 of 880 = 60%

October - 538 of 714 = 75%

l May 532 of 839 = 64%

l June 644 of 814 = 79%

f i

i Responsible:

R. L Thompson, Senior Nuclear QA Engineer Page: - 2.

onta ceaiected By:

Geyle Widou, Safety Aseeeement W l

l

CR-3 Monthly Performance Trond - October 1996 :

Instances

'j Component Not in Expected Posit.

um u

f Jan. - 0 l

Feb. - 1 5

Mar. - 1 Apr. - 2 4

~

~ "

3 4.

May - 2 Jun. - 1 I

3 Jul. - 2 gl

.i( 2

- f Aug.- 3 3,

Sep.- 3 Oct. - 0 1

1.

- - - = - -

Nov.

V0',.

Dec.

  • 0'2 j

~e f

Apr[k Mayf

' Jun,

. Jul.

Aug Sepi lOct.

Nov-EDec JJan

.Feb_,

Mar.

g Definition of the Performance Indicator This indicator is derived by reviewir g all Problem Reports and Precursor Cards for those addressing components found in an unexpected position.

l Pedormance teeseurementITarget P

Tha target is to have zero events, but there is no specific goal set, as this is a type of" precursor" trend to avoid an event that would affect plant operation. For example, an increasing slope would be an indication that the probability of a more significant problem has increased.

7 i

Analysis / Summary I

x L

There were ZERO instances of components found in an unexpected position during the month of October.

l t

i This improvement is directly attributed to the recent implementation of concurrent verification for all manipulations. Other contributing factors are procedure writers watching for conflicts in valve positions between procedures, and increased accountability for use or non-use of STAR by individuals.

[

I l

t l

Responsible:

- R. W. Devis, Assistant Plant Director Operations & Chemistry

~.Page:

3 Data castected By:

R. L Thompson, Senior Nucieer Queuty Assurance Er.gineer b

CR-3 Monthly M~ Trend -October 1996 Tow Comments Awsiting Procedure Revision e

Jun. - 1110

_Q

-- m z-Jul. - 1183

, or, E

E E

Aug.- 1260 700 E

E E~

650 E

5 1

~E2 E

'E E

E-Sep.- 1309 600 E i E

E E

E~

m Ap*

Oct. - 1286 550 E'~

E E

E E

Nov.

m

'a e

m

.m

. = 500 d

M

-m m-E']

m C EOPs 2 Dec.

m

"E m

a m

1: 350 j? 300 Fiew Trend M --

a m

m m

  1. E E

E E

E E 250

'No Data) a r-m r-m F-m F-m -.

F-2' : 200 E d E'E E

E-E E E E 150 E

E' E

E-E E E E E E 100 I

Jan Feb Mar Apr

' May Jun.

Jul Aug Sep-Oct Nov Dec-Definition of the Perfomience Indicator This indicator tracks the number of open items that require a revision to Operating Procedures (OP's), Annunciator Response Procedures, (AR's), Abnormal Procedures (AP's), and Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP's).

Performance Measurementi Goal The goal is a continuing downward trend. The desired me.aenance" level of open items is to be determined as the 2 year action plan begins to reach conclusion.

Analysis / Summary -

The number of open commente requesting a procedure revision is high at this time. Many here been addressed and are awaiting tv..uw and approval from the Plant Review Committee (PRC). EOP's will drop in Open items November, as PRC is scheduled at the end cf the month to review many completed changes. A plan is being O P's A R's AP's EOP's developed to eliminate AP comments in 1997.

June 644 74 167 225 Efforts are currently underway to reduce the backlog of comments for OP's and AR's. The numbers had been July 669 78 198 238 rising due to focused efforts to extract coraments from other areas (such as desk folders, etc.), and to place all Aug.

748 71 200 241 comments into NUPOST for ease of tracking and trending. The drop in numbers this month can be attributed Sep.

791 77 200 241 Oct.

767 78 200 241 to the completion of that effort and the approval of procedure revisions.

Nov.

Dec.

Responsible:

R. W. Deves, Assistant Plant Director Operations & Chemistry Page:

_4-Data Collected By:

R. L Thompson, Senior Nur: leer Quality Aeourance Erryneer 7

~

CR-3 Monthly Performance Trond - Ocicu=r 1998 Overdue

- Problem Report Corrective Action Steps Jan. - N/A l

5 Ermnow 5 ovensuo Feb. - N/A Goal = ZERO Overdue Stepe '

Mar. - N/A 80 Apr. - N/A i 70 May - 23 Jon Feb Mer Apr May -

Jun

'Jul

~Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -

i Definition of the Performance Indicator l

This indcator shows the number of corrective action steps in Problem f.eports that are extended during the month and the number of steps that were overdue at the end of the month.

Performance IAmesurementi Goal The first goal is to maintain the percent of steps extended to < 5% of the total number of open corrective action steps.

The second goalis to have zero steps overdue at the end of the month. The table below shows the percent &ges of the number of extensions and overdue steps.

Analysis 1 -- - : i-This indicator has been revised to show extensions during the month PROBLEM REPORT CORRECTIVE ACTION STEP STATUS - NOVEMBER 12t5 cnd the number of steps overdue at the end of the month, broken down by department. The number of steps overdue is a dynamic number that changes from day to day. The data will be collected about one DEPARTMENT Steps Extensions

% Extensions Overdue

% Overdue week into the following month for consistency.

Materials & Controls 7

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

Nudear Operations 121 9

7.4 %

2 1.7%

- There were 60 out of 887 steps (6.8%) extended in October.

Nuclear Operations Training 21 0

0.0%

0 0.0%

- There were 58 out of 887 steps (6.5%) overdue at the end of the Quality Programs 27 2

0.0%

2 7.4%

l month.

Nuclear Plant Tech Support 214 12 5.6%

18 8.4%

l Nuclear Engineering Programs 37 4

10.8 %

0 0.0%

- Of 887 open steps, Engineering / Projects /NPTS are responsible for Nuclear Operations Engineering 249 16 6.4 %

29 11.6 %

7 500 steps (56%) and Operations /Maintenar5ce/D

'ontrois are Site Support

'/0 5

7.1%

5 7.1%

responsible for 262 steps (30%).

Maintenance 84 S

6.0%

1 1.2%

Work Controls / Outages 57 7

12.3%

1 1.8*4 PR-96-0337. Untimely Resolution of Problem Reports. was issued to TOTAL 887 60 6.8%

58 6.5%

address the concem of numerous overdue steps.

-4ble

D. T. Wilder, Manager Nuclear Sofety Asseeement Team Page. 5 i

y Data Collected By:

' R. L Thompson. Senior Nudeer QA Engineer

CR4 Isenedy Performance Trond - October 1998 e

Total

' Nuclear Operations Engineering Open REA's Jan.- 559 eac e.ciriese i. i ni.ohereesi m serweiurai T eet

'Feb.- 528 Me - 526 Apr. - 518 000 May-481

op.,, seio, o < 200 ?

==500 Jun. - 432 7 -- -

1302 Jul. - 431 g

ac ; 400

~

Aug -435 Sep. - 426 l

};300 j;y Oct. -392 100 De o

Jan ~

Feb-Mar '

Apr May

-Jun fJed

('am -

Esp.

. Oct =

Nov' Dec:

OeAnluon of Wie Performance Indiostor This indicator provides data that is intended to reflect the backlog of Requests for Engineering Assistance (REA's)in Nuclear Engineering Design in a particular month.

This indicator provides a measurement of the effectiveness of Nuclear Engineering Design to respond to technical questions, requests for information/ assistance, and suggestions / requests for plant modifications.

Performance IIsoeurementi Goal i

The 1996 target is an open backlog of < 200 REA's.

Analystei"zz i The backlog is large at this time due to ongoing engineering activities that require significant resources. The trend continues to move toward the goal. Additional management oversight will be I&C ELEC MECH STRUCT TOTAL required to continue this downward trend.

Jan 177 193 95 90 559 Feb 168 187 89 84 528 Mar 157 181 92 96 526 Apr 148 175 102 93 518 May 143 174 76 88 481 Jun 124 159 77 72 432 Jul 126 172 57 76 431 Aug 125 171 61 78 435 Sep 121 169 57 79 426 Oct 101 165 58 68 392 Nov Dec Roeponsible:

F. X. Sulltven, Manager Nuclear Engineering Design Page:

6 Date Can=etad By:

A. Blanchard, Admin. Clerk

- CR4 Monthly Performance Trond - October 1998 -

Nuclear Plant Technical Support Open REA's Jan. - 115 Feb. - 120 im.co se.ve.,.ame umuus w T

im muusu e a e memo ei.e.ic.

Mar. - 118 Apr. - 117 200 g

y,y, gig op.a n.ekias

< es Jun. - 103 o

g 1eo JI Jul. - 103 Aug. - 89 95.

Sep. - 99 i

go Oct. - 95 Nov.

l $$ 1 r- -

- =

'-_T

~

h E

1 Jon Feb hier Apr May Jun Jul Ade -

. esp Oct.

Itov -

Dec DeAnttien of the Performance Indicator This indicator provides data that is intended to reflect the backlog of Requests for Engineering Assistance (REA's) in Nuclear Plant Technical Support (NPTS) in a particular month. This indicator provides a measurement of the effectiveness of NPTS to respond to technical questions, requests for information/ assistance, and suggestions / requests for plant modifications.

Performance RIsoeurementi Goal Tne 1996 target is an open backlog of < 60 REA's.

Analysie / O -. : i The NPTS backlog reduction effort continues, with a goal of reducing the total number of REA's assigned to NPTS to < 60 by the end of 1996. This also includes ZERO open REA's initiated prior to I&C Elect Mech RR Total 1995.

Jan 48 15 52 0

115 Feb 49 16 55 0

120 Mar 50 14 54 0

118 Apr 48 15 54 0

117 May 49 14 48 0

111 Jun 48 13 42 0

103_

JJ 39 17 43 4

103 l

Aug 33 10 40 6

89 Sep 38 10 43 8

99 Oct 36 9

37 13 95 Nov Dec Responelble:

.~

. J. H. Tony, Meneger Nuclear Plant Technical Support Pege:- 7 Data Collected By:

W. L Peruche, Department Support Sp=a= bat

A v

w+-H

+-

k-aA w

a 3

a.

A-2 AJ--e---A--s

-ua.-J sLA--

A

'-m-~Ja-a-A,-

A.

A-

--=-

-G

-A-JL--

s s

i 1

l 1

1 i

.0Cm b

O

%h-i i

S g.

l

>m O

W 4

I e-K a

i h

CR-3 Wlonthly Trond Report - October 19961

-Total CR-3 Violations vs. Region il

,E

%g aimin im en.a.cna

- i m mone n.a.ca.s

im varow-en4 --.- n.eion 2 =e. tew Jan.-0 Feb. - 0 20 Mar. - 0 y

Apr. - O f

May - 9 g

Jun. - 1 8

f Jul. - 9 f

$ 12

/

Aug.- 0 i

/

5

~~

j8,Zero's from JanuaryMprii

/

Nov.

I Dec.

0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Definition of tite Perforssience insticator

'I This indicator trends cited and non-cited NRC violations as they are identified in formal NRC inspection reports. This trend will be for violations resulting from 1996 activities only.

The Region 2 average comes from data supplied by International Energy Services. The data is obtained from formal Inspection Reports that have been electronically recorded in the NRC public document room. It is the average per " site" (there are 33 plants at 18 plant sites in Region 2).

Performance MeasusententIGoel-Maintain the number of cited violations,"resulting from 1996 work activities", below the Region 2 average.

AnalysteiSuenniery There were two NRC Inspection Reports received in October. They were; Annual Performacce Summary f

- Inspechon Report 96 This NRC integrated inspection covered a four week period from 8/11/96 - 9/07/96

[

end identified seven Severity Level IV violations. Five (5) of these violations resulted from 1996 work activities.

l """ " *""

-*- "'*" '

  • l I

(

40

- Inspection Report 96 This was a Special NRC Inspection to review the adequacy of the licensee j

3 investigation of the potential tampering event from 09/19/96. Wrthin the scope of the inspechon, there were no j

violations identified.

5 j

10 S

u n

1992 1993 1994 1995 Year Enaine 1

Responsitde:

G. H. Heinon, Manager Nuclear Plant Operellons Page: ;8 IDete Collected By:

R. L McLaughlin, Nuclear Reguistory Specselet

+-

e?

CR-3 RAonthly Trend Report = -: October 1998 ;

i percent i

Ratio of Non-Cited Violations / Total Violations Jan. - 0%

100 Feb. - 0%

Mar. - 0%

A Apr. - 0%

go May - 33.3%

L--------------------------------------------g,,

Jun. - 40%

1; so Jul. - 37%

E Aug.- 37%

i E 40 Sep. - 32%

~

26 %

Oct. - 26%

Nov.

20 Dec.

Zero percent through April 0:

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l

Dellnition of die Perfennonce truficatsw This indicator is the ratio of non-cited violations (NCV's) to the total number of violations. This trend will be for violations resulting from 1996 activities only.

I Perfonnance AAsseuresnentiGoal e improve the ratio of non-cited (i.e., self-identified) violations to total violations to > 67%.

l l

. +.

i i

There were two NRC Inspection Reports received in October. They were:

Annual Performance Summary

- Inspection Report 96 This NRC integrated inspection, covering a four week penod from 8/11/96 -

"/

c" 9!07/96, identified seven Severity Level IV violations. Five (5) of these violations resulted from 1996 f

work activities.

L""

f

/

/

1 so

- Inspection Report 96 This was a Special NRC Inspection to review the adequacy of the licensee 20 f

investigation of the potential tampering event from 09/19/96. Within the scope of the inspection, there

'O

[

were no violations identified.

0-1992 1993 1994 1995 i

Therefore, the ratio declined to seven non-cited violations to twenty-seven total for the year-to-date, or 26 percent.

i Page:

9 Responsible:

G. H. Heinon, Manager Nudeer Plant Operemons _

~

s..

Data Collected By: -

R. L McLaughlin, Nucteer Regulatory Armaanse B

j i

i

- ~ - -

CR-3 Monthly Perfornience Trend - October 1996 LER's l-Licensee Event Reports (LER's) - CR-3 issued 1996 LER Occurrences - CR-3 I

d 1996 Supplomonte - CR-3 Z

YTD (LER's leeued) - CR-3

+ Region 2 Avg. ILER's Received by g,7 NRC)

Feb. - 6 23 Mar. - 1 24 22 Apr. - 2 i

it 20

~#

May-7 U 16 p'

i2.5 Jun. - 0 I

/

r Jul. - 3

} @

Aug.- 0 i

E 6 SeE' - 0 3

4

/

~

t 2

i b

U i

'O I

i u-0 Nov.

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec g

i DeAnition of the Performance Indicolor a

LER's are reported based on the "date of occurrence" so that the most recent information is available for trer ding. Some events may have occurred during the month but their LERt are not " issued" until the beginning of the subsequent month. The Year-to-Date reflects the total number actually issued. Supplements are reported based on l

the date of " data submittal".

The Region 2 average comes from data supplied by Intemational Energy Services. It comes from the number received by the NRC and electronically recorded in the NRC y

public document room The number will show the trend for LER's received from the 18 Region 11 sites, but is behind at least one month for " occurrences" sirace there are 30 days from the occurrence until an LER inust be issued.

Performance messeurement/ Goel The # of LER's is one of 11 indicators that makes up the Regulatory Index which has an overall goal of > 7.5.

Analyele / Summary There were FOUR occurrences in October, which brings the year-to-date total to twenty-eight.

Annuet Performance There were TWO LER's issued in October, which brir.gs the year-to-date total to twenty-three.

Summary There were ZERO supplements submitted in October, leaving the year-to-date total at eighteen.

,k 20 The Region ll average is 12.5 LER's received through October.

_g__g__

_Z p_

1992 1993 1994 1995

+

i Rooponsible:

B. Gutherman, Menegos Mu4aar Licensing

, Page:.10 Data Collected Byf T. W. Catchpole, Senior Nucteer Uconsing Engineer

i e

i a

i i

.l 4

1-

' 3 >n ;. '.. * ' -.

'6 ',@,-

' ' a1,5 '-,, v;l.. 9 nr. cy?,y : c

... )?,.

.s

,;p.. _-l.i

^

l

,9

4,.,..'r.,'-

),....

8,

' ;- j.. -h,.,F t- '..;.. ;

... /.. q

'{..

..e v

.p g

p.., 4..... l '. M',. ' ' }a.i
. J

.,.r

't

  • ....E,i.

'i,,'

(.'

,)

.,....[.=p',-

..'.,gi

.e'..54l..

,I.

.,lV

'-., q:..[4

./".. -. '

. i. j.4

,{j '.., F. y.' -.,

' I

,.s H,r.

'sW.., :,..

74 (

s i- *. ? i' -'

( l,

\\.-... e, n

1.

,.',M*

',s' t

  • * ' ' ' [

'.e g^.

I:

e.

i '<

r'

' i.

,.ie

j N'

.sy. j.'

,l.-

.d.,- (.

.: - u,'.",

- q r j,,'-

.n..

'l..',.,,

s, '.,

'4,

't.c.,g-.'... -.'.:.,

...7 e

.,.. :'. 4 l

f..,.,.i 5 -

ee 1

5 " 9, jj 9,;.: ;

s hr v

...~:,

g+ fp.}x.9...r,\\c [, ;.gn. j

-gv::,.,..

..n...4

  • 5.[ h* $ hl, k>m n....,

+s,,a N,ffwAg ih. 4 mn.a n n c

( -

CR-3 Monthly Performance Trond - October 1996 :

Percent g

Jan. - 99.56 100 Feb. - 10R E0 Mar. - 10R Targe.2 = >99.5%

99.6

____l______________

Apr. - 10R 99.4 May - 99.46 y 99.2 Jun. - 99.68 k 98.8 Jul. - 99.71 3

gg Aug.- 99.66 Sep.- N/A

'8 ~ 8 Refdel~10 Extended Shiitdown

. 98.4

~

Oct. - N/A m

Nov.

98.2 Dec.

96 Jan-Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug.

.Sep^

Oct '

Nov Dec DeAnluon of the Performance Indicator The ratio of the design gross heat rate (corrected) to the adjusted actual gross heat rate, expressed as a percentage. The design gross heat rate is the initial plant design gross heat rate corrected for modificatic>ns. The actual gross heat rate is the gross heat rate at which the plant actually operates, adjusted for circulating water inlet temperatures, differences from design values, and the use of steam driven feedwater pumps. Actual gross heat rate data is collected during one 24-hour period each month with equipment in normal lineup and power level greater than 80 percent. Indicator values are not expected to be significantly below 100 percent.

Performance MeasurementiTerget Achieve a Thermal Performance target of greater than 99.5 percent.

Analysis I t..._.;y This indicator will have no data until CR-3 retums to service in the spring of 1997.

f CR-3 replaced the low pressure turbine during the 10R refuel outage. The expected generation gain is approximately 13 MWe. Therefore, the estimated new f

design heat rate is approximately 9680 BTU /KWH. This chart will show a TPI based on the estimated new Gross Maximum Capacity and estimated Design

[

Gross Heat Rate.

I Testing to determine new unit rating and design heat rate was in progress during the 3rd quarter. Necessary corrections will be made when the data analysis is completed in the 4th quarter.

1 Responsible:

J. H. Terry, Mene0er Nuclear Plant Technical Support,

Page:

11-Dato consected By:

T. V. Deo, Nuclear Project Engeneer

(

1 l

J

CR-3 Monthly Performance Trond - October 1996 e Total Contaminated External Leakers Aux. Bida. -

E an. ewe.

E Aux.eus.

E Asmonoueno. O Asoueme.

E o m ese=

Jan.- 67 Feb. - 10R 70 Mar. - 10R 60 - --

Apr. - 10R May - 44 50 Jun.-42

  1. I

~

~

Jul. - 41 Aug. - 45 10

]

Dec.

Jan.

Feb

. Mar Apr May Jun-

' ' Jul

.LAug

.Sep:

Oct Nov.

Dec Definitlen of the Performance indicator This performance indicator concentrates on " contaminated" leakers. It tracks the number of work requests with identified extemal contaminated fluid leaks. They are

{

broken down into those located in the Reactor Building (RB) and Aux. Building (AB). They are further subdivided into whnther they can be worked on-line or in ca cutage mode. This is an aggressive attempt to focus our efforts on elimination of contaminated area, reduction of Dry Active Waste generated, and the reduction of liquid waste.

Performance MeasurementiTarget i

The target is to eliminate leakers that can be repaired on-line.

l Analysis f i--- - rj.

The overali number of identified contaminated leakers throughout the plant currently stands at 83. Of these, there are 65 located in the Aux. Building. Work Controls is preparing to repair as many as possible during the current plant shutdown. As of mid-November, the status of the 65 leakers in the Aux. Building is:

12 complete and awaiting Post Maintenance Testing (PMT) after startup.

8 on the current schedule for repair.

19 on the list of valves to be assigned to NNI for repairs.

6 on the list to be assigned to the machine shop for repairs 22 remaining to be scheduled at a later date.

[

Responelble:

TJ. W. Campbell, Assaient Drector Maint. & Radiation Protection Page:

12 Data Collec*ed By:

S. G. Rushion, Nuclear Planning Coordinator

- CR-3 Monthly Performance Trond - October 1996 x

- 1996 Core Contaminated Floor Aree Unluel = 435 % It.) -

Souare Feet l

Jan. - 435 500 Feb. - 435 i

450 Mar. R 400 N.

Apr. R May - 140 350-

~

s

)g N

Jun. - 140

_ _ N Jul. - 140

]

Aug.- 140 Goal = Zero sq. ft.

Sep. - 0 150 in Auxqq c.-0 100 R E F U E L 10 Nes.

~

Dec.

50 -

s

,O, w

O-Jon Feb Mar.

Apr May Jun

~. Jul Aug-Sep Oct '

Nov Dec i

Definition of the Perfonnance indicator This goal tracks the core area of contaminated floor surface that is targeted for permanent decontamination in 1996. This does not include the reactor building.

Perfonnance RAmesurement / Target The goal for this indicator is to reduce the remaining " core" area of 435 sq. ft. in the Aux. Building to zero by the end of the year.

AnalysisiSummary The decontamination and recoating of the Post Filter Room and Valve Alley was completed on September 20th, bringing '? conclusion the two and one-half year Auxiliary Building Zero Core Contaminated Floor Space Decontamination Project at CR-3. This project began in May of 1994, after Refuel 9.

The next step in the process is "real time" decontamination of con *-- =ted areas generated from Maintenance activities, leaks, and spills. This means that these arcas wiil be decontaminated as a step in the overall work controls pr ' orevent a backlog of contaminated areas as existed prior to May,1994.

This indicator will be carried as part of the quarterly performance indicator report through the end of the year. The responsible organization will determine what the goals are for 1997 and what parameters to trend.

i f

l Responsible:

- J. W. Campbell, Assistant Drector Maint.~ & Parnaman Protocelon Page: :13 Date Cossected By:

G. H. CadweN, Supervisor Nuclear Faciuty Services

^

t i

l

. CR-3 Monthly Performance Trond

  • October 1998 -

Total Radioactive Weste Generated a

Cubic Feet (Instados essendary & Piemory nomine, umsene Presseeks IAndle, Petus, OIL eledge, EAmente, and Dry Angue wheemp.'

Jan - 2530.5 i

End of Year Terget < 11054 cu. ft.

Feb - 566.8 10000 E

W Mar -1504.7 Year-to-Date

.4 Apr - 1780.4 f

8000 May - 824.0 Jun -7443.9 j

7ago Jul - 7645.4 6000 Aug - 7979 4 f 5000 Sep - 8035 4 l

u Oct -8043.4 l

a Nov l

3000 Dec L

2000 --

1000 --

t t

0 i

Jon Feb

. Mar Apr :

May

.Jun

. Jul Aug iSep.

Oct

. Novo I Dec '.

DeAnillen of the Perforutense tsuScotor P

This indicator measures the combined volumes of secondary and primary resins, waste processing media, filters, oil, sludge, metals, and dry active waste generated at CR-3.

This is prior to being sent to an off-site processor for volume reduction and disposal.

[

I l

l Perfennonce IAsemurementi Terget l

The 1996 end of year target is < 11.054 cubic fact. This is the summation of two targets; < 6667 cu. ft. for the 10R outage and < 4387 cu. ft. for the remaining portion of the year.

j

\\

Analysis / Sam The following waste v.as generated during October for a monthly total of 208 ft*:

f 1

r DAW - 80 ft* generated (Normal workload)

Filters - 32 ft' generated (Regular filter changeout)

Metals - 96 ft* generated (This is outage cleanup from 10R) i 1'

l I

Responeltslo:

J. W. CampbeA, Aeoistent Plant Director Maint. & Radiation Protection

.Page:

.14 -

j Data C, elected By:

J.D. GRiert, Chemistry & Radiation Protosson Speclaget

~

' 1 - L_

i i

- CR-3 Monthly Performance Trond - October 1998 (

Total Dooraded Degraded Eq_tx% Backlog Non-Ouhige Outage Jan.-

198 412 Es**

Feb.- 227 422 E nonouses.

E oueno.

r Mar. - 261 46 9 500 Apr. - 322 318 450 May-471 330 Jun.- 429 270 j 32'-

Refuel 10 E

e E

outage Tew V Jul. - 373 236 Aug.- 397 260 g

Sep. - 381 246 g 300 -

" 250 -

"* W -

Oct. - 381 274 g

'7 Nov.

1 150 Dec.

1C")

w,

O l-r

. Jan -

Feb-Mer -

Apr

. May Jun L Jul >

Aug.

S*P

. Oct Nov Doc'_

Definition of the Performance indioetor Degraded equipment is " equipment that is in a condition or state which is less than the original specification" (i.e., valves with a seat leak, instrumentation reading incorrectly, frayed electrical wires, etc.). This trend includes all shops.

Performenos Measurement 1 Target

+

The target for this indicator will be a cycle 11 target equal to the number of open work requests identified as " degraded" at the beginning of 10R. This was 227 for non-outage and 422 for outage. After 10R, the trend will be monitored to ensure goals are not exceeded during opstational cycle 11.

Analyelo1 Summary As CR-3 continues in its current shutdown, emphasis will focus on scheduling and working outage work, while continuing the attention necessary to address the non-outage work requests. The data reflecting this is in the upper right corner of this indicator. There are also 112 work requests that are " priority 4", requiring a

" system outage. Management is focusing their efforts to address this backlog during the current plant shutdown.

Responalbio:

J. W. Campbell, Aeoistent Plant Director Maint. & Rediethn Protechona-

_ Page:

15 Data Collected By:

R. L Thompson, Semor Nuclear QA Engineer

, -. - ~.... -. -. - -

CR-3 Monthly 7.A

.:: Trend - October 1996 -

Total CM's l

Corrective Maintenance (CM) Backlog _

Non.outoge outage E ouise.Taisi.

(Completed VMt's are Cars closed in the poet 30 daya)

E weToise.

Jan.-

25 23 100 Feb.-

28 22 7

Mar. -

51 37 90 Refuel 10 Apr. -

80 28 May -

55 10 70 Jun.-

46 10 80 Jul. -

50 10 50 Aug.-

89 13 Sep.-

52 6

y Oct. - 49 8

V Nov.

Dec.

outage Target y Jon

.Feb

_ Mar Apr.

- May ;

Jun~

~ Jul '

Aug~

Sep.

. Oct Nov-

~ Dec -

i Dennition of the Perfonnance Indicator Work requests identified in MACS as " Corrective Maintenance" (CM) items are those equipment that are out-of-service (Broken). This is a count of open work

[

requests, designated as CM, reported on the 12th of the month.

This is a " subset" of those work requests identified in MACS as " degrade f".

Perfonnance RAooeurement / Target l

The target for this indicator will be a cycle 11 target equal to the number of open work requcsts identified as " corrective maintenance" at the beginning of 10R. This

[

was 37 for non-outage (includes those system outage WR's that can be done on-line) and 22 for outage (requires the plant to be off-line).

l l

Analysis iSumenary:

It is in the planning stage of the work controls process that work classes, such as CM, are identified. Reductions in September and October are reflective of the aggressive scheduling of maintenance, especially on control board deficiencies. The data in the upper right comer of this indicator now shows the number of I

actidies each month, both outage and non-outage. There are also two work requests that require a " system outage". Continued emphasis will be placed on the elimination of outage leakers and control board deficiencies.

j i

Rooponsible:

J. W. Campbell, Assistent Plant Director Mont. & Radiabon Pmtection 4

Page: L16 Data Collected By:

R. L Thompson, Sensor Nuclear QA Engineer j

I CR-3 MontMy Performance Trend - October 1996 ~

Total Repeat Maintenance Jan = 12 50 g aos.

Feb = 20 g

45 0.05 '

Mar = 22 I

g 40 0.04-Apr = 28 35 o 04 May =28 h[ 20 g

/

=

0.02 g Aug = 19 15

.o 02 Sep = 21 s

10 -

. o 01 Oct = 16

[

a:

5 a01 Nov 0

s o'

Dec Jan Feb

_ Mar Apr.

May =

Jun

'Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

~ Decl

~

Definition of the Performance indiceter This data is the number of work requests that fall under the classification " Repeat Maintenance", and is compiled by evaluating the work history downloaded from MACS. The chart also shows the percentage of work requests that planners have identified as " degraded" in MACS that are repeat maintenance (red on a specific component /part which occurs within a 24 month period of time).

PerfonnenseIAsseurementIGoal-This is a new trend. It is being tracked in order to support shop efficiency goals, and to aide System Engineers in the evaluation of repetitive and/or functional failure concems relating to the Maintenance Rule.

Analysio 1i-... i The number of work requests identified as repeat maintenance (16) are those work evolutions which are similar in scope, that needed rework due to a failure to correct the problem initially. The 2.1% is the percentage of work requests identified by the planner as repeat maintenance compared to the total j

number of work requests that the planner identified as degraded (767). Degraded equipment is " equipment that is in a condition or state which is less than the original specification", including out-of-service (broken) equipment (See rage 15 of this report.).

l t

Responsitne:

. J. W. Campbes, Assistent Plant Director Memt. & Redsabon Protechon Page:

17 l

Date Collected By:

R. L Thompeen Sensor Nuclear QA En0 sneer -

[

CR-3 Monthly Perfonnance Trend - October 1996 -

l Overdue Preventive Maintenance Control Sheets (CS)

~

Non-Outane

' (>25% Past Due Dete)

Total (CS & IC) 100 Jan.-23 80 e om ics' Feb. - 31 h [ _ _ _ _

__C_

ZMetoeL10,

' "**** ' 'C8 8 Mar. - 37

= a: 20 E

E O

  • ome.tes:

Apr. - 59

- :-g 2

0

~'

~

~

~'

May -63 Jan Feb Mer Apr.

May-

-Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct -

' Nov Dec -

Jun. - 58 Jul. - 34 Overdue Preventive Maintenance Instnanent Calibrations (IC)

Aug. - 38

(> 25% Past Due Dete)

Sep. - 35 Oct. - 39 L

g p5 10 a n.aome.pei 5

+

- - -N 15 { 1 E

E l e" 21 Jan Feb Mar Apr May

-Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct _-

Now Dec Defintilon of the Performance Indicator This indicator is a count taken at mid-month, of work requests designated as " Preventive Maintenance" which are greater than 25% overdue. These are separated into Control Sheets (CS) and instroment Calibrations (IC) and further divided into non-outage, system outage, and unit outage.

Performance RAsesurementi Goal-The goal is to have no non-outage PM control sheets or instrument calibrations past their due date by more than 25%.

Analyste i Summary Most of the categories belew have increased during October. Overall the non-outage items decreased after 10R, though slowly because scheduling priorities place these PM's low on the list. The Manager, Nuclear Outage has a list of all PM's due between now and June 1997 (which includes those > 25% overdue). His l

intentions are to address this issue and come out of the current plant shutdown with zero overdue PM's.

Below is a breakdown of those > 25% overdue at the end of October.

I CONTROL SHEETS:

IC CALIBRATIONS:

l

- Outage PM's > 25% overdue = 14

- Outage PM's >25% overdue = 2

- Non-Outage PM's > 25% overdue = 20

- Non-cutage PM's > 25% overdue = 19

- System outage PM's > 25% overdue = 22

- System outage PM's > 25% overdue = 4 i

Responsitde:

. J. W. Campbell, Assistant Director Maint. & R=re=Han Protection

~~. Page:

18 t

Data Collected By:

L A Gen 3 tine, Nuclear Projects Specialist 1

CR-3 Monthly Perfonnance Trond - October 1998 ;

-Temporary 1996 Ternporary Modifications Maddications

Total Jan. - 22 Leek-Repair MAR's Other Temp. MAR's Feb. - 23 ar.- 0 25 Apr. - 8 May - 9 l

,. 20 k

Jun. - 9 l 15 -

Jul. - 10

^"9

} 10.

Goal = < 5 "Other Temp. MAR's" S*P - 7 j

b l

=

=~

Oct. - 8

^

o w

w

~Feb' Mar.

Apr..

May Jun

.- Jul

- Aug.

-Sep-Oct.

Nov:

Dec-h Jan Definition of the Performance indicator j

This indicator shows the number of installed temporary modifications, induding those resulting from Leak Repairs.

l The " table" under Analysis / Summary below shows the age of the modifications.

t t

Pedonnance RAmesurement1 Goal a) The target is to have < 5 temporary modifications in place (excluding " Leak Repair" modifications) f b) There should be no T-MAR's older than one fuel cycle.

? -r,21 "-

-y l

The total number of installed temporary modifications is eight (8). Seven (7) are not Leak i

Repair items. The one Leak Repair item still open is the H. P. turbine flange repair. This Annual Performance Summary requires machining to restore its condition and is currently scheduled for Refuel 11.

40 as D

35

+

July Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

g 3a l

< 6 months 4

5 1

2 g,. 25 6 - 12 months 2

1 2

2 e 8C 20 12 - 18 months 0

1 1

1

}

15 18 - 24 months O

O O

O j

[

> 24 months 4

3 3

3 o.

l Total 10 10 7

8 1993 1994 1995 i

Year Ending t

i Responsible:

K.F. Lancaster, Manager Nudeer Projects 1 ' =~

~

Page:.19 Data Collected By:

O. M.'LayoiProjects E.rp _ ;. Technician

I 1CR-3 Monthly Performance Trond - October 1996. -

1-

[

. MAR Closures Total l

l

> S Months 120 Goal = Close e5 MAR's > 6 months old oe e 110 Jan.- 3

.100 m a - 12 months Feb. - 7 i

$ 90 - c

.i 32,,,,,n,3,

Mar. - 2

[

l. 80 Apr. - 3 7

70 May-8 p

J"".- 8

- 60 m > 24 months E

Jul - 5 l

- 50

_ =>

E

' 40 Aug. - 6

~30 Sep. - 7 Oct. - 4 20 g

10 j l

Nov.

g 0

N Dec.

Jan.

Feb Mar Apr May TJun

= Jul -

'Aug Sep.

Oct i

- Nov Dec I

I DeAnigen of See Perfennanes insilceter To assure timeliness of modification (MAR) closures, particularly outage MARS, Nuclear Engineering has implemented improved controls over the closure process f'

including specific time frames for completing closures. This performance indicator reflects the number of modifications completed, retumed to service, and waiting for final package review and resolution of open items.

t Perfennenee RAmesurennentiTarget s

+

I Complete the modification closure process within 180 days (six months) of the modification tumover or retum to service.

The goal is to have ZERO open packages greater than six months old.

i AnalysieiSusantary There are currently 66 modifications complete and in the closure process. Of those, four (4) are beyond the targeted duration of 180 days. They are waiting on procedure revisions.

July Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

< 6 months 93 90 69 62 L

6 - 12 months 4

5 7

4 12 - 18 months 0

0 0

0 18 - 24 months 0

0 0

0

> 24 months 1

1 1. O l Total 98 96 77 l 66 f

L Responsible:

K. F. Lancealer, Manager Nucteer Projects Page: 20 Dataem By:

O. M. Lavo, Progects Engineering Technician t

- -

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20133B271&oldid=4243145"