ML20132C638

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Sser on FSAR Rev Re Structural Steel Welding.Rev Acceptable
ML20132C638
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek, 05000000
Issue date: 12/26/1984
From: Lear G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Youngblood B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20132C642 List:
References
FOIA-85-161 NUDOCS 8501100018
Download: ML20132C638 (2)


Text

((

'o, UNITED STATES 3

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I

g y

E.

E CASHINGTC N,0. C. 20555 k.... '.'.

DQ,,,,,,

MEMORANDUM FOR:

B. J. Youngblood, Chief Licensing Branch No. 1 Di ision of Licensing i

FROM:

George Lear, Chief Structural and Geotechnical Engineering Branch Division of Engineering

SUBJECT:

FSAR REVISION RELATED TO STRUCTURAL STEEL WELDING

Reference:

Letter from B..J. Youngblood to B. D. Liaw, dated December 13, 1984.

A In accordance with your request contained in the referenced memos the structural and Geotechnical Engineering Branch has reviewed the information contained in the attachments to the referenced memo, and our safety evaluation report is contained in the enclosure. The review is performed by C. P. Tan of Structural Engineering S ction B of SGEB.

wf y

W George u r, Chief Structural and Geotechnical EngineeMng Branch Division of Engineering

Enclosure:

As stated cc:

J. Knight T. Novak

~

B. Liaw P. Kuo C. Tan CONTACT:

C. P. Tan, x28424 E

<z01100G W

\\

3 o

4

'N

)

I

1 ENCLOSURE STRUCTURAL AND GE0 TECHNICAL ENGINEERING BRANCH SUPPLEMENT TO SER WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-482 3.8.3 Other Seismfc Category I Structures The applicant proposed an addition to Section 3.8.3.6.3.3 of the SNUPPS FSAR in forthcoming revision which is applicable to Wolf Creek, as follows:

A "2) Fillet welds need not satisfy the convexity limitations of Section 3.6.1 provided that all other parameters of acceptable weld profile are maintained."

The applicant justified the change on the basis that convexity has detrimental effect on the structural capacity of the weld if no other weld parameters are maintained. The staff has reviewed the change and has the following observation It is well known that a e

convex fillet weld has less tendency to crack as a result of shrinking While cooling, and it is relatively free from undercut.

Even though it may result in excess weld metal, it will not affect the allowable strength of weld determined on the basis of the weld leg size.

As a result of the above observation, the staff concluded that the proposed change to the SNUPPS FSAR Section 3.8.3.6.3.3, applicable to Wolf Creek, is acceptable.

__t

me t.

r n uoa w,t:

n t...:a,. e u.:,.

..m:.

e s i 4; e.

RLCLIVIP G D3 ie' i Docket Number til applicot,,Is}

1. Facilitylles) Involved; the mel

" 7 )n'e'6g*Ntsuci b*

b**M O F O

O O # 6 2-p l

ll ll IIII I

I

2. Functional Arests) Involved:

sched app opnete boiteell operations onsite health and safety

_b construction offsite health and safety safeguards emergency prepar'edness ether tspecify1 IGIEIMICIMl4lLI thiL>IllEIGlh lil llOINIsl IRlRl6l4l4l 3.

Description:

lol f lulc,I I Rl d $1El 14 Islol lolol A lt,I s l ii vl I Fli le l IrlTI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

4. Source of Allegation:

tcheck app opsie boni contractor employee security guard licensee employee news media NRC employee

, private citizen I organization tspecity)

$ otheraspeeffy1 NtMt( E =~ rle u e 4L-d MM DD YY

5. Date Allegation Received:

A.

Arec[4t i

6. Name of Individual tr.rst two initi is one init nom.1 Receiving Allegation:
7. Office:

g g y ACTION OFFICE

' b' I

CMM

8. Action Office

Contact:

(F. si twc, intiie's and test nomei S. FTS Telephone Number:

7 p 7 g, g

10. t us Open,if followup actions are pending or in progress Closed,if followup actions are completed MM DD YY
11. Date Closed:

l l

l

[0

22. Re=='k=:

1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII (Limit to 50 che ectml I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l' Office veer hmber l

13. Allegation Number:

g

,