ML20132B031
| ML20132B031 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 09/20/1985 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20132B015 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-85-32, 50-364-85-32, NUDOCS 8509260081 | |
| Download: ML20132B031 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000729/2008002
Text
r
.N
.
.
ENCLOSURE 1
tj0TICE OF VIOLATION
Alabama Power Company
Docket Nos. 50-343 and 50-364
Farley Units 1 and 2
License Nos. NPF-2 and NPF-S
The follcwing violations were identified during an inspection conducted on
July 29 - August 2, 1953. The Severity Levels were assigned in accorcance with
the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C).
1.
Technical Specification (TS) 6. 5. 3.1.b requires that proposed modifica-
tions to plant nuclear safety-related structures, systems, and components
be approved by the Plant Manager prior to implementation. 10 CFR 50,
Aopendix B, Criterion III and the accepted Quality Assurance (QA) Program
(Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 17.2.3) collectively require that
desigm _ changes , including field changes to be subjected to design control
measu :s commensurate with those applied to the original design, and be
approved by the organization that performed the original design, unless the
licensee designates another responsible organization.
The accepted QA
program also requires that design changes and/or modifications will be
,
handled in a manner which will comply with the requirements of ANSI
N45.2.11-1974Property "ANSI code" (as page type) with input value "ANSI</br></br>N45.2.11-1974" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process..
Contrary to the above,. the licensee has failed to establish measures which
ensure the implementation of TS 6.5.3.1.b; 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion
III; the accepted QA program; and, ANSI N45.2.11-1974 in that procedure
FNP-0-AP-8, Design Modification Control, Revision 10 does not require that
minor departure from designs be approved by the plant manager prior to
implementation, and be controlled in a manner commensurate with the original
design.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I.)
2.
Technical Speci fication 6.5.3.1.c requires that proposed tests and experi
ments which affect plant nuclear safety, and are not addressed in the Final
.
Safety Analysis Report be approved by the plant manager before implementation.
'
,
Contrary to the above, measures have not been established to ensure that the
requirements of TS 6.5.3.1.c are implemented in that procedure FNP-0-AP-1,
Development, Review and Approval of Plant Procedures, Revision 17 does
not address that the plant manager has to approve proposed tests and
experiments before implementation.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement 1).
8509260081 850920
l
ADOCK 05000348
i
G
l
l
l
I
..
.
.
.
Alabama Power Company
Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364
Farley Units 1 and 2
2
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within 30
days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply,
including:
(1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons
for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken
and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid
further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Security or safeguards information should be submitted as an enclosure to
facilitate withholding it from public disclosure as required by 10 CFR 2.790(d)
or 10 CFR 73.21.
Date:
September 20, 1985
,
,
I
k