ML20129C584
| ML20129C584 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 06/27/1985 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20129C587 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8507160261 | |
| Download: ML20129C584 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000456/1985006
Text
.
_-
__
_
_
_
__.
_
_ _ ___
.
-
JUN 2 7 1985
Docket No. 50-456
Docket No. 50-457
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed
Vice President
Post Office Box 767
Chicago, IL. 60690
Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter dated May 6,1985, informing us of the steps you
have taken to correct the items of noncompliance which we brought to your
attention in Inspection Report Nos. 50-456/85006 and 50-457/85006 forwarded
by our letter dated March 8,1985.
Your response to Item 1 of the' Notice of Violation stated that you do not agree
that this is a violation of your commitment to the requirements of ANSI
N45.2.6-1978Property "ANSI code" (as page type) with input value "ANSI</br></br>N45.2.6-1978" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.. We are referring this to NRC Headquarters for guidance on this
matter and will contact you later as to our decision.
Regarding your response to Item 2.a of the Notice of Violation, we agree that
this is not an exanple of noncompliance (and we will remove it from our records).
The information presented in your response was not known to the NRC inspector
at the time of the inspection.
Regarding your response to Item 2.b of the Notice of Violation, we have
reviewed the information in your response and still believe this is an example
of noncompliance. This matter was discussed with members of your staff during
a meeting on May 17, 1985. During this meeting your staff stated that the
following actions had been initiated in regards to invalidated observations /
discrepancies:
1.
BCAP QA has established mandatory Hold Points during the
processing of invalidated observations / discrepancies to allow
QA to review the justification for invalidation.
2.
BCAP QA would review previously invalidated observations /
discrepancies to ensure that sufficient justification for
the invalidations exists.
8507160261 850627
ADOCK 05000456
/
lll
G
,
_
_
- - -
.
.
-.
I
.
.
Commonwealth Edison Company
2
g,
All of the above were discussed in a meeting with your Braidwood staff on
May 17, 1985. Based on the actions described above and in your response no
further response to this item of noncompliance is required. We will review
these actions in a future inspection.
Your cooperation with us is appreciated.
Sincerely,
n07{g59thd by E.Mf00ftf!!d
C. E. Norelius, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
cc: D. L. Farrar, Director
of Nuclear Licensing
M. Wallace, Project Manager
D. Shamblin, Construction
Superintendent
J. F. Gudac, Station
Superintendent
C. W. Schroeder, Licensing and
Compliance Superintendent
DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII
Braidwood
Resident Inspector, RIII Byron
Phyllis Dunton, Attorney
General's Office Environmental
Control Division
D. W. Cassel , Jr. , Esq.
J. W. McCaffrey, Chief, Public
Utilities Division
H. S. Taylor, Quality Assurance
Division
E. Chan, ELD
J. Stevens, LPM
e
.
[/
/urener/ls
a der
' g ike
Norelius
ti tl
06/27/85
f
-