ML20129A640

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Pertinent Info That Supports Recommendation for Initiation of Revs to 10CFR25 & 95 to Implement New Natl Security Policy Directives
ML20129A640
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/26/1995
From: Norry P
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
Shared Package
ML20129A586 List:
References
FRN-61FR40555, FRN-64FR40555, RULE-PR-25, RULE-PR-95 AF37-1-002, AF37-1-2, NUDOCS 9610220207
Download: ML20129A640 (9)


Text

,

pu CKF37-L7 g & UNITED STATES g

j t

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

%*****# April 26, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: James M. Taylor Executive Director for Operations FROM: Patricia G. Norry, Director *~

/

Office of Administration g/

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDATION FOR PROMULGATING A RULE: REVISIONS TO 10 CFR PARTS 10, 25 AND 95 TO IMPLEMENT NEW NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY DIRECTIVES In response to the February 13, 1984, memorandum, " Control of NRC Rulemakings by Offices Reporting to the EDO," I have attached pertinent information that supports my recommendation for initiation of the subject rule amendments.

~

The following three national security initiatives serve as the y

basic for this recommendation:

1.

On October 31, 1994, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, acting as the Executive Program Agent for the National Industrial Security (NISP), approved the NISP Operating Manual (NISPOM).

The NISPOM establishes government-wide requirements for the protection of classified National Security Information and Restricted Data at industrial facilities, including NRC contractors, requirements, NRC licensees and certificate holders.and to the extent feasible w 2.

On April 17, 1995, the President signed Executive Order 12958, " Classified National Security Information." The revised requirements information for handling and protecting classified apply to licensees.

3.

A proposed Executive Order, " Access to Classified Information," has been circulated in April by.OMB to agencies for final review. The new requirements for access to classified information will also apply to licensees.

The effect of the new Executive Orders and the NISPOM is that 10 CFR Part 10, " Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Restricted Data or National Security Information or an Employment Clearance," 10 CFR Part 25, " Access Authorization for Licensee Personnel," and 10 CFR Part 95,

" Security Facility Approval and Safeguarding of National Security Information national and Restricted security Data,"

policies and will no longer be consistent with directives. Some examples are revised accountability requirements for Secret information, revised requirements for review of Foreign Ownership and Control considerations, new locking mechanism requirements, etc.

9610220207 961017 I hh61FR40555 PDR

e .

l l

l Accordingly, I recommend that the current regulations, 10 CFR Parts 10, 25 and 95, be amended to reflect current national I l security policy. Further, I recommend that this action be a final rulemaking effective 30 days after publication under the exception to the Administrative Procedures Act for rules when public notice and comment are impracticable and unnecessary since this will be an implementation of existing National Security Policies which NRC does not have the authority to modify.

Attachments: l

1. Regulatory Agenda Entry
2. Results of Preliminary i Office Review of Rulemaking
3. Preliminary Regulatory l Analysis DISTRIBUTION:

SCF: LRD 3.00.03 [

LRD 3.00.09r R. L. Spessard, NRR

f. LRD 3.00.17 R. F. Burnett, NMSS D/SEC R/F H. L. Thompson, Jr., DEDS Originalsigned by P. G. Norry, ADM J8mes M. Taylor F. A. Costanzi, RES C. M. Holzle, OGC Approved: James M. Taylor B. J. Shelton, IRM Exeuctive Director for Operations D. L. Meyer, RPB d1 J. J. Dunleavy, PERSEC Date: 5 / / /f6~ 1 D. A. Dittmeier, FACSEC I A. L. Silvious, INFOSEC ADM R/F E. L. Halman, DC ED0 R/F Document Name: CFRREV *See attached email concurrences
    • See attached concurrences (CIRCLE the "C" to receive a copy of this document without enclosures; CIRCLE the "E" to receive a copy with enclosures)

OFFICE SEC ** CE PERSEC** CE FACSEC** C INFOSEC** CE DD S C@

NAME DGKidd JJDunleavy DADittmeier ALSilvious RADopp )

DATE 4/12/95 4/13/95 4/ 13/95 , 4/17 /95 4/Jf/95 OFFICE D/ CE RRDB* CE D/AD C I Cg NRR* CE NAME MJBrady MTLesar PGNorry BJSheltonh)00/6 RLSpessard DATE A /j.l/95 3/24/95 4 /J)//95 4 /lD/95 VM 4/4/95 OFFICE NMSS* CE RES* CE OGC* C DEDS, CE CE E h NAME RFBurnett FACostanzi CMHolzle HLTfrompson, Jr DATE 4/4/95 4/5/95 3/23/95 4/3$/95 4/ /95 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

e .

-2 -

Accordingly, I recommend that the current regulations, 10 CFR Parts 10, 25 and 95, be amended to reflect current national security policy. Further, I recommend that this action be a final rulemaking effective 30 days after publication under the exception to the Administrative Procedures Act for rules when pub c notice and comment are impracticable and unnecessary since th s will be an implementation of existing National Security Poli es which NRC does not have the authority to modify.

Attachments:

1. Regulatory Agenda Entry
2. Results of Preliminary Office Review of Rulemaking
3. Preliminary Regulatory Analysis DISTRIBUTIQH:

SCF: LRD 3.00.03 LRD 3.00.09 R. L. pesnard, NRR 7 LRD 3.00.17 R. F Burnett, NMSS D/SEC R/F H. L. Thompson, Jr., DEDS P. G. Norry, ADM F. A. Costanzi, RES C. M. Holzle, OGC B. J. Shelton, IRM D. L. Meyer, RPB J. J. Dunleavy, PERSEC D. A. Dittmeier, FACSEC A. L. Silvious, INFOSE ADM R/F E. L. Halman, DC Document Name: C RREV *See attached email concurrences (CIRCLE the "C" to receive a copy f this docunent without enct rf IIRCLE the "E" to receive a copy with enclosures)

OFFICE SEC E CE FA C INFOSEC CE DD/SEC CEl

'{

, NAME DGKidd / f6AJJDunleavy DADittmeier ALS(JV,ious RADopp DATE 4 //.3/ 95 4/\% /95 4//kf65 4/ D/95 / / 4/ /95 OFFICE D/SEC / CE RRDB* CE D/ADM C IRM CE NRR* CE NAME RJBrady MTLesar PGNorry BJShelton RLSpessard DATE 4/ /95 3/24/95 4/ /95 4/ /95 4/4/95 OFFICE NMSS* CE RES* CE OGC* C DEDS CE CE E

NAME RFBurnett FACostanzi CMHolzle HLThompson, Jr DATE 4/4/95 4/5/95 3/28/95 4/ /95 4/ /95 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Attachment 1 REGULATORY AGENDA ENTRY TITLE:

Protection of and Access to Classified Information for Licensee, Certificate Holder and other Personnel CFR CITATION:  !

10 CFR Part 10, 10 CFR Part 25 and 10 CFR Part 95 l

ABSTRACT:

The final rule would amend the Commission's regulations by conforming NRC policy for access to and protection of National Security Information and Restricted Data to new national policies for the protection of such information.

The existing regulations were promulgated before the October 31, 1994, approval of the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) by the Deputy Secretary of Defense and the April 17, 1995 approval of Executive Order 12958 " Classified National Security Information" by the President. The NISPOM establishes a uniform Government policy for the protection of classified National Security Information and Restricted Data within industrial facilities under a contractual or other (e.g.,

license) legal relationship with the Government. Executive i Order 12958 revises the government-wide requirements for classification and protection of National Security Information. President Clinton is also in the process of approving another new Executive Order, " Access to Classified l Information," which revises the government-wide requirements for access to National Security Information. The current 10 CFR Parts 10, 25 and 95 are not fully compliant with the requirements of the NISPOM and the new Executive Orders.

Some examples are revised accountability requirements for Secret information, revised requirements for review of Foreign Ownership and Control considerations, new locking mechanism requirements, etc. It is, therefore, necessary to revise these regulations to ensure their consistency with established national policy for the protection of classified information.

TIMETABLE:

Proposed Action for Division Review: Within 45 days of issuance of the Access to Classified Information Executive Order.

Office Concurrence on Proposed Action Completed: Within 90 days of issuance of the Access to Classified Information Executive Order.

Proposed Action to EDO: Within 110 days of issuance of the Access to Classified Information Executive Order.

Proposed Action Published: Within 140 days of issuance of the Access to Classified Information Executive Order.

LEGAL AUTHORITY:

42 U.S.C. 2165; 42 U.S.C. 2201; 42 U.S.C. 2273; 42 U.S.C.

5841; E.O. 12829; E.O. 12958; EFOM10'865E soph Clas#sEdadBih%wh6fd@iotRE.OE).Minlpartdyshdin.e@

sifiedgnformat AcldeiEM $ ~ ^^ ~

. - _ _ ..._ . _.-._ _ ___ _.= . _ _ _ .. . _ __._ ._ _ _ ... .._ m.._. . _ . . _ . . _ _ . . . _ . _ _ _ - . . . . _ . _ ,

EFFECT'ON SMALL BUSINESS AND OTHER ENTITIES: None *

' AGENCY CONTACT:

Duane G. Kidd U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Administration Washington, DC 20555 (301) 415-7403 l

l I

^

l l

l l

l 6-i r

l 1

l I

l b

h.

i l

l' .

f Attachment 2 4

Results of Preliminary Office Review of Rulemaking Entitled

" Protection of and Access to Classified Information for Licensee, '

Certificate Holder and other Personnel."

Issue to be Addressed The Office of Administration (ADM) seeks approval to amend 10 CFR Part 10, " Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Restricted Data or National Security Information or an Employment Clearance," 10 CFR Part 25, " Access Authorization for Licensee Personnel," and 10 CFR Part 95,

" Security Facility Approval and Safeguarding of National Security l

Information and Restricted Data," to conform to the requirements of new national security policies. Specifically, the policies include the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), and two new Executive Orders, " Access to Classified Information" and " Classified National Security Information." ADM also proposes to issue these amendments as a final rulemaking effective 30 days after publication under the exception to the Administrative Procedure Act for rules where public notice and comment are impracticable and unnecessary since this will be an implementation of existing National Security Policies which NRC does not have the authority to modify.

I Need for Addressing the Issue Under established procedures for protecting classified National Security Information and Restricted Data under applicable statutory authority, the NRC is obligated to conform its rules to implement changes in national policy imposed as a result of pertinent Executive Orders, among other things. Because these policies for the protection of this information have been revised, it is necessary that NRC conform to the new policies.

Alternatives to Rulemaking ADM sees no alternative to amending these regulations that would be more effective and use fewer NRC resources.

How Issues will be Addressed by Rulemaking The final rule would amend 10 CFR Parts 10, 25 and 95 to conform to new national policies.

How the Public. Industry and NRC will be Affected A negligible effect is predicted for the general public since this rulemaking activity applies only to those licensees and others who need to generate, receive, safeguard and store National Security Information or Restricted Data (as defined in 10 CFR Parts 10, 25 and 95). Approximately 20 NRC licensees and other interests will be affected. In most cases, the effect will consist of minor revisions to Facility Security Plans to conform to new or revised requirements for access to or protection of classified information. Individuals who have already been cleared for access to classified information will be not be required to prepare additional or revised paperwork except perhaps at the time of a

l regularly scheduled reinvestigation. In some cases there may be a reduction in administrative requirements because of the  !

standardization of security requirements under the NISPOM when more than one~ government. agency has a security interest at the facility. ADM views these amendments as a necessity.

t 1

1 e

1 l

l 1

1 I

l Attachment 3 PRELIMINARY REGULATORY ANALYSIS

1. Statement of Problem On October 31, 1994, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, acting as the Executive Agent for the National Industrial Security

' Program approved the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) which established a uniform government policy for the protection of classified National Security Information and Restricted Data at industrial I

facilities possessing classified information under a legal )

(e.g., contract or license) relationship with the government.

4 On AIAIJ 17, 1995 The President signed Executive Order 12958,

" Classif'ied National Security Information," revising the 1

' requirements for classification and protection of National Security Information. Also in April 1995, the Office of Management and Budget circulated the Executive Order, " Access 1

' to Classified Information," that will revise government policies for access to such information. The NRC regulations, 10 CFR Parts 10, 25 and 95, which apply to

- licensees and certificate holders (Part 95 only), were promulgated prior to these new national policies and are not 4

~

fully consistent with them. It is, therefore, necessary for J

NRC to bring its regulations into conformance with current

g national policy.
2. Obiective i

The objective of this regulatory initiative is to bring NRC j regulations into conformance with national policy.

I

3. Alternatives i

There is no reasonable alternative to the revision of these regulations that would achieve the desired result.

i 4. Consecuences

! There are approximately 20 affected entities licensed by or certificate holders of the NRC. In most cases, there will be minor revisions to Facility Security Plans required to conform to new or revised requirements for access to or

protection of classified information. Individuals who.have

! already been cleared for access to classified information 4 will not be required to prepare additional or revised j paperwork except perhaps at the time of a regularly scheduled reinvestigation. In some cases there may be a reduction in j administrative requirements because of the standardization of security requirements under the NISPOM when more than one government agency has a security interest at the facility.

i

1 I

I I

l 4

1 1

. .s.

t

5. Decision Rationale The only available method of imposing these requirements is to revise 10 CFR Parts 10, 25 and 95. Other avenues would lack the requisite formality and legality necessary to require all affected NRC licensees to comply with revised national security policies.
6. Implementation The Division of Security intends to publish the final rule amending 10 CFR Parts 10, 25 and 95 within 140 days of the issuance of the new Executive Order on access to classified information.

.