ML20128P282

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Oecd/Committee on Safety of Nuclear Installation Group of Experts on Source Term, Per K Araj Request Rept Sen/Sin (84)50.Viewgraphs Encl.W/O Rept
ML20128P282
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/29/1984
From: Ryder C
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
To: Goren S
CALIFORNIA, UNIV. OF, BERKELEY, CA
Shared Package
ML20127A894 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-110 NUDOCS 8507130241
Download: ML20128P282 (8)


Text

_ _ _

s Distribution:

Suoj Circ Chron Branch r/f CRyder CRyder r/f

- Es.

MSilberberg ir. Sison Goren 2.2 F. Gilman Lepart;. eat of Cier.ical tic ;incerin.;

cniversit,y of Califor.:it.

.e.rkele.s, CA.!!72G Lear Dr. 6crer,:
st. the re;aest of a...cl i.rcj, I M.vc enclosec ti.e OECD/CS
:I rcDort 5:!./'.;I., (C4) 17., Group of Exoert: on the Source Te - Gre d.

Sir.cerely, Christoaher hyact 6

necice:n Scur:c icr. Progret. Offict Office of tiuclear f.egulatory itesear:r.

Er:clusure: /.s stated

,o/

f I

I 4

I 8507130241 850415 PDR FOIA T

ALVAREZB5-110 PDR a t$-

e med RES:ASTP0 RES:ASTP0

  • " ~ ' * ';..R..yd. e.r :m.d

.. S i l. berber..g.....

"* 11/29/84.., _11/,,,L8.4.,,_.

i c.

wn: acav :ta.;ae se.:. ::.:

OFFiO't L RECORD CO:V

/

st PARTICIPANTS l-STEAM EXPLOSION REVIEW MEETItiG NOVEMBER 27-28, 1984 l

G. BANC0FF NORTH WESTERN M. BERMAN SNL W.' B0HL LANL A. BRIGGS WIf1 FRITH T. BUTLER LANL I. CATTON UCLA D. CHO ANL l

M. CORRADINE (1)

WISCONSON P. CYBULSKIS BCL H. FAUSKE FAUSKE ASSOC.

l T. GINSBERG (1)

BNL F. MAYINGER (2)

FRG D. SQUARER W

T. THE0 FAN 00S PURDUE (1)

Co-CHAIR PERSON (2)

WRITTEN RESPONSES ONLY, MUNICH IECHNICAL UNIVERSITY 6

r a /4 j

I DELPHI EXERCISE QUESTION #1 WHAT, IN YOUR JUDGMENT, IS THE BEST ESTIMATE VALUE FOR THE 1

PROBABILITY OF CONTAINMENT FAILURE ARISING FROM A STEAM EXPL0SION, GIVEN A CORE MELT, THAT WE SHOULD BE USING IN THE SEVERE ACCIDENT PROGRAM.

AS PART OF YOUR RESPONSE, PLEASE PROVIDE THE BASES (EXPERIMENTAL AND/0R ANALYTICAL) AND THE APPROACH USED IN REACHING YOUR CONCLUSIONS.

QUESTION #2 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS ON THE SANDIA STUDY DESCRIBED IN NUREG/CR-3369 AND ANY ADDITIONAL INPUTS AND ANALYSES WHICH YOU FEEL ARE RELEVANT TO THIS STUDY.

AS POINTED OUT i:

AB0VE THE SNL REPORT IS BASED ON ASSUMED UNIFORM DISTRIBUTIONS

)

AND SOME ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS, ASSUMING OTHER DISTRIBUTIONS, MAY BE REQUIRED.

lF

,j QUESTION #3 I'

COMMENTS ON STEAM EXPLOSION RESEARCH PROGRAM...

i e

j-i I

i'

\\

i PRELIMINARY IfWESTIGATOR FAli_URE PROBAEILITY BEST ESTIf1 ATE UPPER LIMIT B0liL/3 UTTER 3 x 104

,1

~

l BRIGGS

< 10-2 l

CATTON 5 x 10-5

~

~

Cl-l0 VERY UNLIKELY CORRADINI 10-4 10-2 L

~

FAUSKE WILL NOT OCCUR

~

GINSBERG 4 x 10-3 4 x 10-2 MAYINGER INTEGRITY OF GERMAN PWR WOULD NOT BE ENDANGERED SQUARER 10-4 10-6 10-4 Tile 0 FAN 00S L

BERI1AN 1

S l

L

i

~

e ENERGY IMPARTED TO STRUCTURE FOR ALPHA FAILURE

.5GJ MISSILE KIrlETIC ENERGY 120MJ ENERGY TO FRACTURE BOTTS 150MJ ENERGY TO RUSH INTERNALS 250MJ e

EXPLOSIVE ENERGY (T0 SLUG) 1-2GJ e

TOTAL THERMAL ENERGY AVAILABLE

~100GJ l

e CONVERSION RATIO 3-15%

e ALL INVESTIGATORS PRESENT LIMIT TO MIXING OR C0HERENT PARTICIPATION ARGUMENTS e

INVESTIGATORS ANALYZED MELT PARTICIPATION PROCESS AND CONCLUDED THAT SEVERAL 1000KG COULD INTERACT C0HERENTLY WITH EFFICIENCIES UP TO 15% TO PROVIDE l,

ESTIMATES OF EXPLOSIVE YIELDS LESS THAN 500MJ l

y

?

l t

l l

l TASK II INDEPENDENT AUDIT l

l e

BNL, T. PRATT, G. GREEN, ET AL e

SURRYTMLB'-Y j,

~

e INDEPENDENT APPLICATION OF CODE SUITE INPUT / BOUNDARY CONDITIONS OBTAINED FROM BCL i

l MODELLING/N0 DING / DATA TRANSFER INDEPENDENT l

MARCH, MERGE, CORS0R, TRAPMELT, CORCON, VANESSA, flAUA i

j e

OBJECTIVE SHOW LIKE VALUES OF AIRBORNE CONCENTRATION i

WITHIN CONTAINMENT VS, TIME DEMONSTRATE TRANSFERABILITY l

l-1

-,4.

.. - _,. ~. _. -. _.. _ _.. - _ _ - _ - _, _ _,, _ - -... _ - - -. - -.

l 9

i l

L l

GESSAR e

GE STANDARD PLANT-APPLICATION BWR-6, MARK III i

e NEW METHODS EMPLOYED L!

i e

RANGE OF VALUES OF RELEASE FRACTIONS REPORTED

.. !o

~

l REFLECT DECADES UNCERTAINTY FOR SOME NUCLIDES o

CENTRAL ISSUE FOR THIS DESIGN IS P0OL SCRUBBING l

AND P0OL BYPASS e

STAFF ABLE TO MAKE DECISIONS l.

e COST / BENEFIT ANALYSES USED AS A SCREENING TOOL l

FOR POTENTIAL DESIGN ENHANCEMENTS, BECAUSE UNCERTAINTIES LARGE COST / BENEFIT CANNOT BE USED FOR FINE DISCRIMINATION e

HYDR 0 GEN CONTROL SYSTEMS REQUIRED BASED ON DEFENSE IN DEPTH AND UNCERTAINTY OF PHENOMEN0 LOGY i

{

l, t

'4 i

e

L NRR APPLICATION 1

i e

MUST RELY ON INFORMED USERS QUESTIONING UNDERLYING l

PHYSICAL UNDERSTANDING SUPPORTING BOTTOM LINE NUMBERS l

e SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS OF NECESSITY MORE DELIBERATE NATURE THAN DEVELOPMENTAL NATURE OF BMI-2104 e

IN ANY SPECIFIC APPLICATION WE WILL STRESS IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF PROBLEM AT HAND (FCI, CCI, FAILURE MODES AND LOCATION) e WORK TO BE COMMENSURATE WITH IMPORTANCE TO SAFETY (GDC-1)

CODE V8V TRACEABILITY OF CODE AND CODE MOD STANDARDIZED MODELING QC 0F IMPUT e

CHECKS APPLICANT / LICENSEE WORK SUBJECT TO 0/A PROCESS NRR REVIEWS APPLICANTS WORK AND APPLICAtlT REVIEWS NRR SPONSORED INDEPENDENT CALCULATIONS WORK SUBJECT TO SCRUTINY OF HEARING PROCESS AND ACRS t

9