ML20128M671
| ML20128M671 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 10/11/1996 |
| From: | Brockman K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Ray H SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9610160146 | |
| Download: ML20128M671 (20) | |
Text
_ _ -...
~ - -
- ~..,. - _ _
...-__..---__.,_..-~..~.-,__.-.~_a._.-.-...
l.
)
t>""' %,
UNIT ED STATES
- p NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION k
REGloN IV b
611 RYAN PLAZA oRIVE, SulTE 400 AR LINGToN, T E xAS 76011 8064 9
l OCT I i 1996 l
1 i
Harold B. Ray, Executive Vice President Southern California Edison Co.
]
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 128 j
San Clemente, California 92674-0128 i
SUBJECT:
ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT MEETING i
Dear Mr. Ray:
)
i l
This refers to the meeting conducted in the Region IV office on October 7,1996. This meeting related to the status of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report review process at your San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. Enclosure 1 lists the personnelin attendance i
at the meeting. Enclosure 2 is a brief outline of the presentation.
)
i i
i The nuclear engineering design manager, licensing manager, and other personnel from these organizations presented the status of their upgrade program. We found this meeting i
to be beneficial by providing us with the scope, plans, and current progress for the l
completion of this effort.
2 l
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them l
with you.
Sincerely,
/
f c
/enneth w
~
Br km, Acting Director Division of eactor Safety l
Attachments:
- 1. Attendance List
- 2. Licensee Presentation s
Docket Nos.: 50-361,50-362 License Nos.. NPF-10, NPF-15 4
i 9610160146 961011 PDR ADOCK 05000361 P
,y 7,
7 m _.,. _
_ww,..
.-c
. =..
~
n e
..,1
Southern Calfrornia Edison Co. !
CC:
Chairman, Board of Supervisors County of San Diego 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 335 San Diego, California 92101 Alan R. Watts, Esq.
Rourke & Woodruff 701 S. Parker St. No. 7000 Orange, California 92668-4702 Sherwin Harris, Resource Project Manager Public Utilities Department City of Riverside 3900 Main Street Riverside, California 92522 R. W. Krieger, Vice President Southern California Edison Company San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, California 92674-0128 Dr. Harvey Collins, Chief Division of Drinking Water and Environmental Management California Department of Health Services P.O. Box 942732 Sacramento, California 94234-7320 Richard Krumvieda, Manager Nuclear Department San Diego Gas & Electric Company P.O. Box 1831 San Diego, California 92112 Mr. Steve Hsu Radiological Health Branch State Department of Health Services P.O. Box 942732 Sacramento, California 94234
)
t
1 1
e Southern California Edison Co. I I
Mayor City of San Clemente 100 Avenida Presidio San Clemente, California 92672 Mr. Truman Burns \\Mr. Robert Kinosian California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness, Rm. 4102 San Francisco, California 94102 i
t
1 Southern California Edison Co. @](DMBl(IE45)~~TJ bec distrib. by RIV:
L. J. Callan Resident inspector DRP Director DRS-PSB Branch Chief (DRP/F, WCFO)
MIS System Senior Project inspector (DRP/F, WCFO) RIV File Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)
M. Hammond (PAO, WCFO)
Leah Tremper (OC/LFDCB, MS: TWFN 9E10) j i
1
' Qkch of documetst, indicate in box: "C" = Copy weout enclosures "E" = Copy with erplosures "N" = No copy RIV:SRl:EB E
C:EB E
D:DRFJgo AD:DRPp _ (V TStetka
$b CVanDenb ygh JDyer " 'y KBrockmanl f 10/9/96 10/q/96 ' e 10/IO/96 10/;l/96 V
~
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY I
l Southern California Edison Co.
-4 bec to DMB (IE45) bec distrib. by RIV:
i L. J. Callan Resident inspector DRP Director DRS-PSB Branch Chief (DRP/F, WCFO)
MIS System Senior Project Inspector (DRP/F, WCFO) RIV File Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)
M. Hammond (PAO, WCFO)
Leah Tremper (OC/LFDCB, MS: TWFN 9E10)
To receive copy of document, Indicate in box: "C" = Copy wthout enclosures "E" = Copy wth er)k:losures "N" = No copy AD:DRPg
.(V RIV: SRI:EB E
C:EB E
D:DRPjfo TStetka
$b CVanDenb ggh JDyeP 'V KBrockman { f 10/9/96 10/9/96 'A 10A0/96 10/gl/96 V
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
ENCLOSURE 1 MEETING: SAN ONOFRE ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT MEETING
SUBJECT:
STATUS OF UFSAR REVIEW PROCESS DATE: October 7,1996 ATTENDANCE LIST NAME ORGANIZATION POSITION TITLE W. Ang (by telecon)
NRC - Walnut Creek Field Senior inspector Office D. Chamberlain NRC - Region IV Acting Deputy Director-DRP M. Fields (by telecon)
NRC-NRR Project Manager J. Sloan NRC - Region IV Senior Resident inspector T. Stetka NRC - Region IV Acting Branch Chief A. Kaneko SCE - Nuclear Engineering UFSAR Review Proiect Design Manager G. Plumlee, ll1 SCE - Nuclear Regulatory Supervisor, Regulatory Affairs Compliance J. Rainsberry SCE - Nuclear Regulatory Plant Licensing Manager Affairs M. Wharton SEC - Nuclear Engineering Manager, Nuclear Design Organization Engineering Design l
l
1 o
ENCLOSURE 2 Licensee Presentation j
a l
i l
o j
i l
1 l
i i
UFSAR REVIEW PROJECT s
FOR THE i
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR t
GENERATING STATION l
s L
1 I
t I
E 1
i l
i i
i UFSAR REVIEW PROJECT I
Background
e t
e Review Plan Scope s
Organization Purpose Methodology Schedule & Resources i
e Current Status Summary e
2 i
t
BACKGROUND e
NRC Focus u
Refueling Practice Review s
NRC Review of UFSAR i
i e
Review of SONGS UFSAR NOV 361(362)/9526-01 SCE Pilot Review SCE April 22,1996, Letter
SCOPE UFSAR Chapters included in Current Review:
e Ch.1 Introduction and General Description of Plant u.
Ch.2 Site Characteristics s
Ch.3 Design of Structures, Components, Equipment, and Systems Ch.4 Reactor Ch.5 Reactor Coolant System and Connected Systems Ch.6 Engineered Safety Features Ch.7 Instrumentation and Controls Ch. 8 Electric Power l
Ch. 9 Auxiliary Systems i
f-
i SCOPE l
UFSAR Chapters included in Current Review (cont.):
e Ch.10 Steam and Power Conversion System Ch.11 Radioactive Waste Management Ch.12 Radiation Protection t
Ch.15 Accident Analyses UFSAR Chapters Not included in Current Review e
Ch.13 Conduct of Operations Ch.14 Initial Test Program Ch.16 Technical Specifications j
Ch.17 Quality Assurance j
s l
. m.
i ORGANIZATION Project Manager s
Overall Coordination and Direction i
Nuclear Engineering Design
\\ Design and Safety Evaluations Chapter and Section Leads System Design Engineers Integrated Plant Review Engineer Nuclear Fuel Management Safety Analysis Station Technical Division Operation, Maintenance, and Testing Plant Licensing Guidance and UFSAR Processing l
i t
j i
i i
i N
PURPOSE r
Primary Purpose to Validate Accuracy e
Maintain Existing Format and Level of Detail I
i t
t
[
i
4 METHODOLOGY Existing Programs o
UFSAR Update Procedure l
s Action Request Procedure s
Supplemental Project Guidance e
Comparison With Source Documents Preparation of Section Markup Generation of Action Requests Periodic Review of Progress and Results Independent Review by IPRE Preparation of UFSAR Change Package and 50.59 Incorporate Changes and Submit UFSAR Revision L
8 m.
. -. -.. ~
~...
- ~. - - -.
i ID
' start Finish duration duration quantity
. } WO'l N 1 D I J I F i M l A 1 MTJ l'7JMSM i D i J l F I MT_A_LMIEJM 1996 1
199 1
1998
- Activity '
Early Early Original Remaining Budgeted fRESP r
MILESTONES? ' M A M.W
> %%i WC !% ~
...a on,
t..
o...
..o.o
, %m. m m.,,
,,,o...
,,,,,g mmm 1
CHAPTER COMPLETION 3 FSARM9000 03JUN96A 0
0 0 00 KANEKO PL/ NISS JEC l
F5IRM59015 05DEC96 0
0 0.00 ANDERSON CHAPTliR t REVIEWED & S JBNITTE:D TD LICENSIN
[
F55I MS9000 1765655~
O O
0.00 ROOT CHAPTER 1REVIE'WED& SUB MITRED TO:JCF,NSi!OG R
(
l b
FSARMS9020 31DEC96 0
0 0.00 ANDERSON CHA PTE R S REVIEWED &SUBM TTED TO LICENSINC.
I FSARMS9035 13JAN97 0
0 0 00 BERKSHIRE g
HAPFER 8 REVIEWED & SUBJITl ED TO I;lCE1 SING l
l 1
1 l
F5A M '590 5 14JAN97 0
0 0 00 ANDERSON CHAP FER 6 iilEVIEnVED& SUB JITTED TO t.lCE 1 SING N
FSARMS9010 27JAN97 0
0 0 00 OSBORNE CHA PTER3 REME%1ED 6 SUBMITTED TO LICENSING l
l l
l CHAP"ER 2 Rl!VIELVED & SUBMITTED TO LICENSING b
FSARMS9005 12FEB97 0
0 0.00 OSBORNE
}
FSARMS9030 E5FEB97-0 0
0.00 BOCKHORST CHAPTER 7iREV EWED 6 SUBMITTED TC LIC ENS ING 9
f I
F5 FiiUi55055 I
O7 MAR 97 0
0 0 00 CONKLIN ICHAPTER 1 2 RlEVIE WED& SUBWT"ED TO 1.lCENSING l
FSARMS9045 24 MAR 97 0
0 0.00 HOJATl CHAPTER 10 REVIEWED 5 SUBM TTED TO LICEN3tNG I
~
BHA FS' FlidS9040 28 MAR 9'7 0
0 0 00 BARONE STER 9'REVEWED 6 SUt3MirTED TC LICENSING i
N I
FSARMS9050 16MAY97 0
0 0 00 HOJATI CHAPFER 11 F EVIEWi[D 8 SUllMilTED TO LICENSlNG
.b FSARMS9060 28JUL97 0
0 0.00 THOMSEN CH 15 RiiV!EWED BY NEDO/GUBMITTEDTO t ICE 1SI i
LICENSING SUBMITTAL FSARMS9080 31 MAR 97 0
0 0.00 LICENSING 3EGIN LFSA R R EV.
3S OF,E IDENTIFICATION I
O l
FSARMS9070 22OCT97 0
0 0.00 LICENSING LFSA R R EV. 13 DEVELOF ED.L AFPRQV l
_ _ f_
f i
w f,
'm w =~* m--a e n-021X 7301 (WBC BY CHAPTER)
- ~
/A M.. _ _ _ _ _e m,
g j
FSAR REVIEW PROJECT PRIORITY = HIGH 4--~
I EARLY EARLY ORIG REM BUDGET i
1996 19 9 ACTIVITY lO RESPONSIBILITY START FINISH DUR DUR QUAN.
APRMA4RJNh sthif)CT)JO4ECJANj F lM Af(APRV A(IUN!JUL %Ur75EW)CT1 N CH. 8 - ELECTRIC POWER (REB) WBC=SA08 CHAPTER SECTI,ON 8.2 (HARA)
REVIEW APPENDICES 8 2A/B FSAR08405 HARA 10JUN96A 290CT96 89 30 64 use.revosw n s I
REVIEW 8.2 - OFFSITE POWER SYSTEM FSAR08403 STEC 3SEP96A 150CT96 30 20 0
%3 4
CHAPTER SECTION 8.3 (BASU) i I
l REVIEW 8 3 + ONSITE POWER SYSTEM l
FSAR06410 DESIN 28MAY96A 30AUG%A 68 0
25 REVIEW 8 3 -ONSITE POWER SYSTEM FSAR08409 WRIGHT 10JUN96A 150CT96 89 20
\\ 24 I
REVIEW 8 3 -ONSITE PCWER SYSTEM FSAR08412 BISWAS 10JUN96A 150CT96 89 20 300 I
REVIEW 8 3 - ONSITE POWER SYSTEM I
FSAR08407 THIND 8)UL96A 150CT96 73 20 160 REVIEW 8.3 - ONSITE POWER SYSTEM FSAR08411 BASU 8JUL96A 150CT96 70 20 200 I
Rt: VIEW 8 3 -ONSITE POWER SYSTEM FSAR08414 UOSLEY 8JUL96A 150C196 70..
20 136 REVIEW 8.3 - ONSITE POWER SYSTEM FSAR08413 HARA 1 AUG96A 150CT96 52 20 100 W
REVIEW 8.3 - ONSITE POWER SYSTEM
[
FSAR08408 RICHTER 3SEP96A 30SEP96 20 10 20 REVIEW 8 3 - ONSITE POWER SYSTEM FSAR08415 STEC 3SEP96A 150CT96 30 20 0
I CHAPTER 8 PACKAGE COMPLETION & APPROVAL l
PREP SECTION CHANGE PACKA 3ES & RESOLVE ISSUES
- I FSAR08418 BARONE 18JUN96A 150CT96 62 20 5
17sEPes. CPL aEJC nsress to isoc?se I
PREP SECTION CHANGE PACKAGES & RESOLVE ISSUES FSAR08416 BERKSHIRE 1JUL96A 12NOV96 84 39 189 I
I 173EP90. CPL REJC 200C754 TO SJNOv98 6
YoE.
NN
= = n a ca.
PRl*H 021X 7301 (WBC BY CHAPTER)
D IU Er FSAR REVIEW PROJECT (DETAILED)
FROM START DATE TO FINISH DATE m e,- s,- w In
Son Onofrg 2&3 FSAR Updated ONSITE POWER SYSTEMS O
[ successfully reject rated lea p ej u,cp A
. letion of the
^$
following test sequence is reqw r;de v u /uhe/ :
//d,i. I s :
';' d 1.
Carry the continuous rated load for 22 hours2.546296e-4 days <br />0.00611 hours <br />3.637566e-5 weeks <br />8.371e-6 months <br /> after the time
,g required to reach engine temperature equilibrium.
+0 2.
Carry the rated short-time load for an additional 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> following step 1 above.
~
s.
q
~
%d
- 3. ['fteduee-lead-to the-continueu.
M D378881 ret-in;b; l:'cject,-continuous-lea d reje tNo the u,% o n e
The appropriate test loads, test durations, and test acceptance criteria are identified in the applicable test procedure.
B.
Start and Load Acceptance Qualification
[Thistestestablishesthecapabilityofthedieselgeneratorto start and accept load within the period of time to satisfy the plant design requirements.
At least 270 of these tests are performed with the diesel generator set initially at " warm-standby".
Thirty more tests are perfomed with the engine initially at normal operating temperatures.
The 300 tests are M
performed with no more than three failures.
The start and load N R g, tests are connected as follows:
s.
Ds 1.
Engine cranking begins upon receipt of the start signal and 3
d $.j the diesel-generator set accelerates to specified frequency y ?,'
and voltage within 10 seconds.
,y I
2.
Immediately after reaching specified frequency and voltage, 2 f'j m
the diesel-generator set accepts a single resistive stap 5
load equal to 507. of the nameplate continuous rating.
Voltage and frequency stabilize to within specified limits within the required time interval.
Start and load acceptance qualification is achieved by reference to the test performed on the diesel-generator set for Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS) Nuclear Project No. 2.
The results of this test are provided as supplementary data as listed (in table 1.8-7.
A comparison of the WPPSS and San Onofre Units 2 and 3 test and equipment is presented in table 8.3-6.
The diesel-generator set manufactured for WPPSS is identical to en bE gge that manufactured for San Onofre Units 2 and 3, with the excep-l g,..t."
tion that the generator vendors are different and that one of the
. tandem diesels in the San Onofre set has four less cylinders.
ptid'g.tH[Thecylindersofthe16-and20-cylinderenginesareidentical I
,both in size (645 cubic inches) and arrangement of fuel injection i equipment.
As noted in table 8.3-6, the San Onofre diesel i
, p,,q generator uses the same size and number of starting motors for a
g,, g f. ] -
$80' ach start, thereby producing the same starting torque. g.e F/
The San Onof re 16-by 20-cylinder tandem diesel-generator set as e
rSt.
i CURRENT STATUS
\\
Engineering Reviews About 30-35% Complete e
Errors ke Being Identified No Operability or Reportability issues To Date i
I i
1 i
b 12 t
SUMMARY
UFSAR Accuracy is important e
e Effort is Successful Apparent Cause e
Lack of Attention to Detail Errors in Judgement Non Standardized Terminology Failure to Update FSAR Open issues e
Mechanism to Ensure Accuracy Maintained In-depth Root Cause Evaluation 13
.. -