ML20128L307

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-269/85-11,50-270/85-11 & 50-287/85-11.Corrective Actions: Annual Rept Re Nuclear Station Mods Prepared & Submitted. Personnel Involved Counseled Re NRC Rept Requirements
ML20128L307
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/19/1985
From: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
NUDOCS 8507110309
Download: ML20128L307 (2)


Text

_ -

s.

g

,;)

s. -

DUKE PowEn GOMPANY 18.0. Isox 33180 CifAHIAYITE, N.O. 28242 Of*

TE11 PHONE IIAI, II. TUCKI?H d O j% 4'i

//ti e.

(704) 07:F4 S:11 w a r.

, =,

June 19, 1985 n g '. 3 mm.

.mm.

3 Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323

Subject:

Oconee Nuclear Station IE Inspection Report 50-269/85-11 50-270/85-11 50-287/85-11

Dear Sir:

In response to your letter dated May 20, 1985 which transmitted the subject Inspection Report, the attached response to the cited items of non-compliance is provided.

Very truly yours, f

iia 1 B. Tucker PFG: sib Attachment cc:

Mr. J. C. Bryant NRC Resident Inspector Oconee Nuclear Station 9

711 9

50619 MhSOOO269 A

G PDR

\\\\

Ze o/

e 45 T'.

Violation 10 CFR 50.59(b) requires that the licensee shall maintain records of changes in the facilit'y and of changes in procedures made pursuant to this section, to the extent that such changes constitute changes in the facility as described in the safety analysis report or constitute changes in procedures as described in the safety analysis report. These records shall include a written safety evaluation which provides the bases that the change does not involve an unreviewedLsafety question. The licensee shall furnish annually to the NRC.a report containing a brief description of such changes including a summary of the safety evaluation of each.

Additionally, 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4) requires that the submittal changes made under the provision of 10 CFR 50.59 shall reflect all changes up to a maximum of 6 months prior to the date of filing.

Contrary to the above, the annual report for nuclear station modifications completed between January 1 and December 31, 1983 was submitted on March 7, 1985.

This is a Severit y Level IV violation (Supplement 1).

Response

(1) Admission or denial of the alleged violations:

This violation is admitted.

(2) Reasons for the violation:

This violation resulted from Personnel Error. The personnel involved in the preparation, review and submittal of the report failed to submit the report as required by 10 CFR 50.59(b).

(3) Corrective actions.taken and results:

A report was prepared and submitted upon discovery that no annual report for nuclear station modifications completed between January 1 and December 31, 1983 was submitted. This incident is considered to be an isolated case and of minor significance.

The personnel involved in this incident have been counseled concerning the Regulatory Requirements for the preparation and submittal of future reports.

(4) Corrective action taken to avoid further violations:

No additional corrective actions are necessary.

(5) Date.when full compliance will be achieved:

Not applicable.

I y

9 e

A y

-')

t