ML20128G923

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to Procedure EDP-16, Procedure for Technical Review of Procurement Documents
ML20128G923
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/19/1985
From: Hansen M, Johnston L, Walz V
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To:
Shared Package
ML20128G886 List:
References
EDP-16, NUDOCS 8507090357
Download: ML20128G923 (18)


Text

. .

ATTACHMENT 4 TO JPN-85-55 Engineering Design Procedure 16 Procedure for Technical Review of Procurement Documents l

l l

New York Power Authority 1 James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant )

l Docket No. 50-333 1 8507090357 850702 PDR ADOCK 05000333 P PDR L d

. , p e

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY JAMES A.*FITZPATRICK NUCLEAll POWER PLANT

) ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE

%J ,

/ TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 0F PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS S

Q

  • PREPARED BY: VICTOR M. WALZ/MOG NS HANSEN DATE 6///[/[

TITLE: SENIOR PLANT ENGINEER / PLANT ENGINEER

) .

APPROVED BY:

7/(t/Tiv 'O[. 4 4T Sub TECHNICAL SERVICE 8 SlWr.

DATE CONCURRED BY: ;C, ,

QUALITY ASS @ NCE SUPT.

k' ATE h//7[8['

O APER 0vED BY: 6 y de- I b DarE c//f/tr RESIDENT MANAGER 4

Page No.:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Rev. No.:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page No.: 12 13 14 15 16 17 Rev. No.- 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD c he e e m Ts.' ^g1 pM s m.

u s ot py 1 .

)  %

Rev. No. O Date 0//f//J~ Page 1 of 17

. _____-__-_-__O

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY

,-s s JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

( ) ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE LJ TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 0F PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 To provide instructions and guidance for performing and documenting technical reviews of procurement documents for Quality Assurance Category I and M material. This procedure may also be used for review of QA Category II and III procurement documents at the discretion of plant management.

1.2 To provide instructions for evaluating the acceptabil-icy of Commercial Grade Items (CGI) for use as spare and replacement components and parts in QA Category I and M applications.

1.3 To provide instructions for review and update, as required, for the warehouse stock records system parts description.

(~} 1.4 To provide a mechanism for initiating the appropriate K/ engineering support activities, such as modifications and nuclear safety evaluations, when original part numbers and designs are obsolete, superseded or components are upgraded.

2.0 REFERENCES

2.1 Work Activity Control Procedure 10.1.4 (latest re-

. vision) - Procurement of Materials and Services 2.2 Quality Assurance Procedure (QAP) 4.1 (latest revision)

- Procurement Document Review

-2.3 Quality Assurance Instruction (QAI) 6.1 (latest re-vision) - Procurement Document Review 2.4 Engineering and Design Procedure (EDP) 12 (latest revision) - Procedure for Establishing Quality Assur-ance Category Classifications 2.5 Work Activity Control Procedure 10.1.6 (latest re-vision) - Control of Modifications, Component Changes, and Safety and Environmental Impact Evaluation Reports 2.6 Code of Federal Regulations, 10CFR50, Appendix B and fw 10CFR21

( l g.a Rev. No. O Date '/h S/h3' Page 2 of 17 j

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (em) ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 OF PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS 2.7 ANSI Standard N45.2.11 (1974) -

Quality Assurance Requirements for the Design of Nuclear Power Plants 2.8 USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.64 (Oct. 1973) -

Quality Assurance Requirements for the Design of Nuclear Power Plants 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Qualified Technical Reviewer -

Personnel who by experience and/or training, are competent in the technical design requirements of nuclear power plant system design, component design, plant design criteria, materials, and equipment qualification.

3.2 Commercial Grade Item (CGI) -

A component or material item which is to be used in plant QA Category I appli-cations and is to be ordered from the manufactur-(~)

(>

er/ supplier on the basis of specifications set forth in the manufacturer's published product description (e.g.

. catalog). CGI material is not normally fabricated to a QA program meeting the requirements of 10CFR50, Appen-dix B or ANSI N45.2 and the reporting requirements for 3 defects of 10CFR21 do not apply. In order to use CGI components in QA Category I or M applications, a technical review must be conducted to ensure that technical requirements are met and the item can be dedicated for a specific system / component application.

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 Technical Services Superintendent 4.1.1 Responsible for the technical review of all QA Category I and M procurement documents for plant equipment and services per this proce-dure. These procurement documents may include the requisitions for the following:

a. Warehouse stock material
b. Direct turnover material for modifica-tions, if specifications are not pro-vided by the responsible design orga-

% nization.

s)

Rev. No. O

~

Date 6dF/#J Page 3 of 17 l

_]

s NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY n JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

() ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 0F PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS

c. Direct turnover material requisitioned by the applicable department superintendent (Maint., I&C, and RES).

4.1.2 Responsible for initiating and preparing modifications per reference 2.5 should the procurement process- result in design and document changes which are defined as a modification.

4.1.3 Responsible for initiating, authorizing, and verifying changes to the technical descrip-tion for stock items in the warehouse stock data base. The changes will include the additions and deletions of technical require-ments based on the design requirements for the material being ordered.

4.1.4 Responsible for the filing and retention of

(]-

procurement document technical reviews.

4.2 Department Superintendents 4.2.1 All Department Superintendents who authorize the procurement of QA Category I and M plant equipment and services are responsible for ensuring that the technical review defined in this procedure is correctly performed by a qualified technical reviewer or that the Technical Services Department is requested to perform this review.

4.2.2 Responsible for forwarding completed procure-ment document technical reviews to the Technical Services Department for approval.

4.3 Site ~ Manager of Finance 4.3.1 Responsible for the updating of technical re-quirements in the warehouse stock records data base upon receiving authorization from the Technical Services Department and the Quality Assurance Department.

,: s f h

%J Rev. No. O Date /r/d/ ~

Page 4 of 17

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY s JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT i

's ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE J

TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 0F PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS 4.3.2 Maintaining the required security for stock item component descriptions to ensure that only properly reviewed and authorized changes are made.

4.4 Quality Assurance Superintendent 4.4.1 Resaonsible for the review of and concurrence witi procurement document technical review.

5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Perform a technical review of procurement documentation (purchase requisitions or purchase orders) using the Enclosure 6.1 (Part I) titled: " Procurement Document Technical Review Summary". Obtain a serial number for the review from the Technical Services Department.

O V

5.2 Perform the technical review based on the technical requirements for the components as established by the existing plant documentation which may include, but not be limited to, the following:

5.2.1 Plant design drawings (controlled) 5.2.2 Vendor equipment / component technical manuals 5.2.3 Environmental and seismic qualification test reports and evaluation sheets 5.2.4 Original plant design and procurement speci-fication (AP, APO, GE Specification, etc.)

5.2.5 New or revised plant design and procurement specifications 5.2.6 JAFNPP Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) 5.2.7 other plant design documents, as necessary 5.2.8 JAFNPP Component QA Category List 5.2.9 JAFNPP Modification Packages

,m 5.2.10 Piping and pressure vessel design codes (j

Rev. No. O Date /F 7 Page 5 of 17

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY

,s JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (v) ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 0F PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS 5.2.11 JAFNPP Technical Specification 5.2.12 Previous purchasing documentation 5.2.13 Other known regulatory requirements.

5.3 Confirm the system and component applicability as stated on the procurement documents. If additional system and component applications are known or are determined during the technical review, add these to the procurement document and the Enclosure 6.1 (Part A) form.

5.4 Verify that the quality assurance category is as stated on the component QA Category List. If the QA Category is not known or if there is any question relative to the correct category, perform a QA classification evaluation per reference 2.4.

n v 5.5 Procurement requirements consist of all technical and quality assurance requirements which the item being ordered must meet in order to be used in the plant.

These requirements must be included on the purchase order.

Verify that the component description and any required technical and quality requirements resulting from the Enclosure 6.1 technical review are clearly stated on the procurement document. All design requirements, part numbers, test requirements, etc. should be stated as part of the description of the item being procured.

Refer to reference 2.1 for the proper format for the material descriptions. Ensure that all seismic, environmental, hydrostatic, material, and examination (NDT) test requirements are specifically stated or the -

governing specification is stated.

5.6 Commercial Grade Items 5.6.1 Commercial Grade Items (CGI) may be utilized in QA Category I and M applications provided they meet all of the ap?licable technical requirements. To establisa if CGI equipment is acceptable for use in QA Category I cr M (q

g applications, perform a technical evaluation using the Enclosure 6.1 (Part II) form Rev. No. O Date f/#f~ Page 6 of 17

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY s JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (s }) ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 0F PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS titled: " Evaluation and Dedication of Commercial Grade Items for Safety-Related Applications".

This evaluation form may be used for procurement purposes or for dedication of existing warehouse stock.

5.6.2 Perform the Part II evaluation for the acceptability of using a CGI based on a technical review of the plant design documen-tation listed in Section 5.2 of this proce-dure.

5.6.3 If the Part II evaluation confirms the acceptability of the use of a CGI for the specified system and component application,

^

complete the appropriate spaces on the form and sign including name, date, and title, (d

5.7 Prepare changes to the procurement documents, which are now required based on the completed technical review.

5.7.1 Stock Items -

initiate a change to the warehouse stock system data base per refer-ence 2.1.

5.7.2 Purchase Requisition -

initiate a revised purchase requisition.

5.8 Forward the completed Procurement Document Technical Review Summary (Parts I and II) and Attachments (original or revised procurement documents) to Quality Assurance for concurrence. Following concurrence and signing, the summary is returned to the Technical Services Department.

5.9 If during the procurement document technical review process, it is determined that the material being procured is no longer available, obsolete, or has been upgraded by the vendor, initiate and complete appropriate modification documentation per reference 2.5 in parallel with changing the stock records or revising the purchase requisition.

n

(') 5.10 Completed procurement document technical reviews shall be retained and filed in the Technical Services Department.

Rev. No. O Date $!/ // d'J " Page 7 of 17 i

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

()F ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 OF PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS 6.0 ENCLOSURES 6.1 Procurement Document Technical Review Summary Part I - Technical Description and Component Appli-cability Part II - Evaluation and Dedication of Commercial Grade Items (CGI) for Safety-Related Applications l')

t-

-l Rev. No. O Date #// // #J" Page 8 of 17 j

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

(])_ ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 0F PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS ENCLOSURE 6.1 Review No.

PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW

SUMMARY

Part I - Technical Description and Component Applicability A. General

1. Purchase Req. No. 2. Item No.(s)
3. Stock No.(s) 4. QA Cat.
5. Material Description (attach additional info. by item number if necessary.)

D Y

B. Component Applicability

1. System (s):
2. Component ID(s):

(Attach List if Necessary)

3. Environment Harsh (lEH) YES/NO Mild (IEM) YES/NO
4. Seismic Design Requirements YES/NO C. Specifications / Design Requirements
1. Original Plant Specification (AP, APO, CWO, GE, etc.)

O Rev. No. O Date #hA/

/ #J' Page 9 of 17 i

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

[ ') ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE w/

TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 0F PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS ENCLOSURE 6.1 Review No.

PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW

SUMMARY

(contd.)

Part I - Technical Description and Component Applicability C. (Cont'd.)

'2. Previous Order No.

3. Applicable Plant Dwgs.
4. Applicable Technical Manual D. Technical Requirements Evaluation (Circle Correct Response)

(")

(_/

1. Material technical description is complete / accurate. YES/N0/NA
2. Complete item part number / drawing is specified including revision. YES/N0/NA
3. Seismic design requirements apply. YES/NO
a. Seismic testing / qualification specified or specification invoked. YES/N0/NA
b. Seismic analysis performed and available. YES/N0/NA 4 Environmental qualification requirements for harsh environments (IEH) apply. YES/NO
a. EQ testing / qualification requirements specified or specification invoked. YES/N0/NA
b. EQ test report on file and reviewed. YES/N0/NA State title or EQ File Reference No.:

n NA Rev. No. O Date '[/ 'J/ d'f' Page 10 of 17 J

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

(_3 ) ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 0F PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS ENCLOSURE 6.1 Review No.

PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW

SUMMARY

(contd.)

Part I - Technical Description and Component Applicability D. (contd.)

5. Applicable design and/or material codes and standards are specified or specification invoked. YES/N0/NA
6. Non-destructive testing requirements are specified for pressure boundary parts, i.e. RT, UT, MT, and PT or specifi-cation invoked. YES/N0/NA
7. Hydrostatic or pneumatic test requirements are specified or specification invoked. YES/N0/NA

(])

8. Material traceability requirements are specified,'i.e. CMTR.' YES/N0/NA
9. Applicable packing / shipping requirements are specified or invoked by specification. YES/N0/NA
10. JAFNPP warehouse storage requirements are specified. YES/NO
11. Material post-fabrication functional or -

operability testing specified or invoked by specification. YES/N0/NA

12. Calibration requirements specified or invoked by specification. YES/N0/NA
13. For radiation area applications, non-metallic materials are suitable for the specified application. YES/N0/NA
14. Non-metallic materials reviewed to ensure adequate shelf-life and operational life times. YES/N0/NA Shelf Life (if multiple items, m attach list.)

Rev. No. O Date ///#J' Page 11 of 17 1

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

{} ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 0F PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS ENCLOSURE 6.1 Review No.

PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW

SUMMARY

(contd.)

Part I - Technical Description and Component Applicability D. (contd.) .

JS. Additional technical requirements or discussion:

r- E. -Quality Assurance Requirements Evaluation (Circle correct (s) response - if item is N/A - must complete Part II)

1. Vendor QA program meets 10CFR50, App. B and ANSI N45.2. YES/N0/NA
a. QA program reviewed by NYPA/ Case Register /or other evidence of an approved QA Program. YES/N0/NA
b. QA program requirements specified or invoked by specification. YES/N0/NA
2. 10CFR21 invoked by QA program or by procurement documents. YES/N0/NA
3. Additional quality assurance requirements / comments t}

Rev. No. O Date '//X/d7~ Page 12 of 17 i j

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

() ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 0F PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS ENCLOSURE 6.1 Review No.

PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW

SUMMARY

Part I - Technical Description and Component Applicability (contd.)

F. Documentation Requirements Evaluation

1. Certificates of conformance or compliance for the following areas are specified or invoked-by specification as applicable:
a. QA program requirements. YES/N0/NA b, Material code certifications (CMTR, if applicable). YES/N0/NA

/~ c. Procurement specification technical

(-)s requirements including environmental qualification and seismic. YES/N0/NA

2. Post-fabrication functional, operational, hydrostatic, or calibration test reports are.specified or invoked by specification, as applicable. YES/N0/NA
3. Additional documentation requirements O

Rev. No. O Date k[/ L!d'J ' Page 13 of 17 J

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

( ); ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 0F PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS ENCLOSURE 6.1 Review No.

PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW

SUMMARY

Part I - Technical Description and Component Applicability (contd.)

Prepared by: Date

Title:

Concurred by: Date QA Superintendent Approved by: Date

{} Technical Services Supt.

Attachments

1. Attach reviewed / updated procurement description requirements or revised purchase requisition to this review form.
2. Attach any supporting technical information used as a basis for this evaluation which is not readily available in the plant's document / drawing retrieval systems. This should include vendor letters, telecons, memos, etc.

O Rev. No. O Date /9!d)J' Page 14 of 17 3

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

() ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCEDURE TITLE: PROCEDURE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW PROC. NO.: EDP-16 OF PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS ENCLOSURE 6.1 Review No.

PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW

SUMMARY

Part II - Evaluation and Dedication of Commercial Grade Items (CGI) for Safety-Related Applications A. General

1. Purchase Req. No. 2. Item No.(s)
3. Stock No.(s) 4. QA Cat.

(original P.O. it --

applicable) 1

5. Material Description (attach additional info. by item number if necessary.)

)

v 3

Refer to Part I for reference drawings and other design documents or attach list, if Part I not required.

B. Component Applicability

1. System (s):
2. Component ID(s):

C. Evaluation (circle correct response)

, 1. The item is not unique to facilities or activities licensed by the NRC. YES/NO

2. The item is a replacement-in-kind for the original or existing item, i.e. no mod fication is required. YES/NO

Ik(' . Page 17 of 17 J