ML20128A266
| ML20128A266 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 01/22/1993 |
| From: | Merschoff E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Watson R CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9302020174 | |
| Download: ML20128A266 (55) | |
Text
C
(
-e
]
\\p/
JAN 2 2 1993 i
2V Docket Nos. 50-325,-50-324 License Nos. DPR-71, DPR-62 Carolina Power and Light Company ATTN: Mr. R. A. Watson Senior Vice President Nucledr Generation P. O. Box 1551 Raleigh. NC 27602 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
- BRUNSWICK This refers to the management meeting conducted at NRC's request in the Region II Office on January 6, 1992.
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss restart issues at Brunswick.
A list of attendees, a summary, and copy of your slides are enclosed.
It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial in understanding the status of implementing your improvement programs. As mutually agreed, another such meeting (tentatively scheduled for February 4, 1993) will be confirmed under separate correspondence.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclo-sures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact us.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
Jon R. Johnson /for Ellis W. Merschoff, Director-Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosures:
1.
List of Attendees 2.
Meeting Summary 3.
Licensee Slides cc w/encls:
(See page 2) 1 9302020174 930122 PDR ADOCK 05000324 P
\\
ZE01
(
9.
JAN 2 2 1993:
Carolina Power and Light Company 2
cc w/encls:
R. A. Anderson Vice President Brunswick Nuclear Project P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 R. E. Morgan P1 ant Manager. Unit 1-Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 H. Brown Plant Manager Unit 2 Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461
- 11. Ray Starling Vice President - Legal Department Carolina Power and Light Co.
P. O. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC-27602 Kelly lloiden Board of Commissioners P, 0. Box 249 Bolivia, NC 28422 l
Chrys Baggett State Clearinghouse Budget and Management 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603 Dayne 11. Brown, Director Division of Radiation Protection N. C. Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources P. 0. Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611-7687 H. A. Cole Special' Deputy Attorney General State of North Carolina-P. O. Box 629 Raleigh, NC -27602.
(cc w/encls cont'd - See page 3)
'l
K ze; Carolina Power and Light Company-3
'JAti 2 2 1993 (cc w/encls cont'd)
Robert P.-Gruber-Executive Director:
Public. Staff - NCVC P. O. Box 29520 Raleigh, - NC 27626-0520 Ms. Gayle B. Nichols Staff Counsel SC Public Service Commission P. O. Box 11649-Columbia, SC 29211 bec w/ enc 1S:
Document Control Desk H. Christensen, RII-R. Lo, NRR-kr flue o, too NRC Resident lospector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Star Route 1, Box 208 Southport, NC.28461
- l l:
i.
/
I RII Ril RIl-RI DRP
- sy
- tj HCh stensen' DVerrelii J hjson 01
/93 01/U/93 Olt// /93 Olg/93-i~
(.
4 ENCLOSbRE I-1 List of Attendees-Carolina Power and Licht W. Cavanaugh III, President and Chief Operating Officer R. A. Watson, Senior Vice President, Nuclear Operationt _
A. M. Lucas, Vice President,-Nuclear Engineering Department..-
R. A. Anderson,:Vice President, Brunswick Nuclear Project (BNP)
J. A. Dobbs, Special Assistant to Vice President, BNP J. M. Brown, P1 ant Manager, Brunswick Unit'2-J. P. Cowan, Manager, Technical and Regulatory Support D. C. McCarthy, Manager, Nuclear Licensing L. I. Loflin, Manager, Nuclear Assessment Department M. D. Bradley, Manager, Brunswick Project Assessment E. M. Bean, Public Relations Luclear Regulatory Commission S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II _ (RII)
S. A. Varga, Director, Division of Reactor Projects I/II, Office of Nuclear-Reactor Regulation (NRR)-
L. A. Reyes, Deputy Regional Administrator, RII _ _
A. F. Gibson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety.(DRS), RII J. R. Johnson, Deputy Director, Division of: Reactor. Projects (DRP), RII-E. G. Adensam, Director, Project Directorate (PD) 11-1, NRR D. M. Verrelli, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch I,.DRP, RII' H. O. Christensen,' Chief, Reactor Projects Section IA,. DRP, RII R. L. Prevatte, Senior-Resident Inspector - Brunswick P. D. Milano, Project Manager, PD II-I, NRR R. E. Carroll, Project Engineer, DRP, RII-J. J. Lenahan, Reactor Inspector, Materials and Processes Section,'DRS, RII K.
M.- Clark, Public Affairs, RII
l l
4 ENCLOSURE 2 Meeting Summary The licensee began their presentation with a brief status of short-term actions and emergency diesel generator (EDG) 1.
After confirming their intent to address EDG 1 operability in a submittal to NRC by January 22, 1993, the licensee presented their backlog strategy.
CP&L characterized Brunswick's backlog as falling under one of four types:
corrective maintenance; key operational items (i.e., temporary conditions, control room indicators out-of-service, and caution tags); engineering work / evaluation requests; and administrative support. Though not specifically captured by one of the above backlog types, CF&L confirmed that adverse condition reports were being reviewed for restart applicability. With the present influx of identified work items, the license indicated that more are coming in than are being worked. A characterization of the total integrated backlog as of January 4,1993, was presented to be:
5509 pre-startup items; 4648 post-startup items; and 1640 items awaiting screening / classification.
The approximate unit breakdown of this backlog was indicated to be 37 percent (Unit 1), 48 percent (Unit 2), and 15 percent (other).
With regard to backlog management, CP&L stated that the highest management focus was being placed on priority 1-4 items for the 19 systems identified to be important to plant safety / reliability, priority 1-3 items for all systems, and key operational items.
The presented open item strategy includes:
system engineer involvement; work scheduling based on system priority, age, required plant conditions and related work; implementation of programs to reduce the -
number of future items (e.g., corrosion and recurring equipment failure programs); and improved work processes (e.g., minor maintenance program and work control process improvements).
As indicated, targets / standards are to be identified by January 31, 1993, for high focus categories and by February 28, 1993, for the others.
The related vision was presented as having no key operational items older than one cycle and eliminating the excess of other backlog categories over the next three years.
Focusing more specifically on material condition improvement, the licensee indicated that 22 plant areas had been identified for further walkdowns prior to restart, Giving completion dates of February 1,1993 (Unit 2) and April 1, 1993 (Unit 1) for these area walkdowns, the licensee also indicated their plans for hot / pressurized inspections, as well as management field walkdowns and startup inspections.
With respect to assessing startup readiness, line management and the Nuclear Assessment Department (NAD) were identified as having major roles.
As presented, line manage")ent self-assessment has a three element approach consisting of:
(1) functional area assessments involving issues specific to one organizational unit (e.g., configuration control by Operations);-(2) plant issue assessments involving areas of needed improvement applicable to more than one organizational unit (e.g., corrective action effectiveness); and (3) assessments of current performance issues (e.g., component / system opera-bilii.y deiermin.tions).
Similarly, NAD's independent assessment was presented as having three phases.
phase I (November 2, 1992 - January 31, 1993) focuses on plant material condition, personnel / program readiness and resolution of i
1
l 2
NRC/NAD issues. Targeting plant material condition, people and proce-dures/ processes, Phase-II (February 1-12,1993) assesses operations, surveil-lance and testing, plant self-assessment activities, management organization, maintenance, startup test program, and engineering / technical support.
Phase
!!! (February 13, 1993 - startup) involves issue followup, emergent issue resolution, and monitoring of startup activities.
In addition to the above assessments, CP&L indicated that there would be a full-scope INP0 evaluation January 11-22, 1993, and also revealed their plans for INP0 to perform a sample system readiness review.
Furthermore, the licensee stated that there would be special controls and oversight established during startup and power ascension through the existence of plant management on-shif t; augmentation of normal startup readiness checklists with special pre-requisites, inspections and area closecuts; and augmentation of normal startup and operating procedures with special testing and hold-point assess-ment.
At the meeting's end, NRC and CP&L tentatively agreed to February 4, 1993, as the date of the next startup meeting. Additionally, CP&L confirmed that they would:
(1) provide NRC with a conceptual diagram of plateaus / hold points planned for Unit 2 startup/ power ascension; (2) identify who will perform the line management self-assessments; and (3) inform NRC of the findings from the-full-scope INPO evaluation.
c ENCLOSURE-3 h
AGENDA CP&L/NRC Public Meeting (Region ll)
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Outage Progress Report Wednesday, January 6,1993 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 pm I. Opening Remarks S.D. Ebneter R.A. Anderson ll. Unit 2 Outage Status J.M. Brown:
Diesel Generators
- (7/23/92) Status Ill. Backlog Strategy J.P. Cowan i
Characterization Goals and Standards IV. Material Condition Inspections:
J.P. Cowan n
a V. Startup Readiness Review J.A. Dobbs 1
M.D. Bradley VI. Closing Remarks R.A. Anderson:
_l
- S.D. Ebneter ACEN,9 -'
Li' o
UNIT 2 INTEGRA TED STARTUP SCHEDULE CRITICAL PA TH REMAINING DURA TIONS AS OF JANUARY 04,1993
- DIESEL INSPECTIONS 34 DA YS
- 4160V BUS / BREAKER WORK 3 DA YS
- SWITCHYARD WORK 5 DA YS
- ILRT 5 DA YS
- SYSTEM CLOSEOUT / LINEUPS 21 DA YS
- unssa,
.4
(-
DIESEL GENERA TOR
SUMMARY
- DIESEL #1
- REPAIRED FLEX DRIVE GEAR
- COMPLETED " BREAK-IN" RUNS
- COMPLETED OPERABILITY TESTS
- PRELIMINARY MAIN SHAFT ANAL YSIS COMPLETED
- FUNCTIONAL ON DECEMBER 31,1992
- DIESEL #4
- INSPECTIONIN PROGRESS o TEAR DOWN INSPECTIONS - 18 MONTH o BEARINGS o FLEXDRIVE
- THRUSTRINGS
- . PLANNED INSPECTIONS DIESELS #2 AND #3 BEARINGS
- THRUSTRINGS
- FLEX DRIVE (#3)
- TEAR DOWN INSPECTIONS - 18 MONTH (#3)
UNIT 2 INTEGRA TED STARTUP SCHEDULE NEAR CRITICAL PA TH REMAINING DURA TIONS AS OF JANUARY 04,1993
- (MISCELLANEOUS STEEL 37 DA YS)
- SYSTEM CLOSEOUT / LINEUPS 21 DA YS
- STARTUP / SVNCHRONIZA TION 6 DA YS_
TOTAL 81 DA YS U23SSNCP
UNIT 2 INTEGRA TED STARTUP SCHEDULE MAJOR PROJECTS REMAINING DURA TIONS AS OF JANUARY 04,1993
- MISCELLANEOUS STEEL 37 DA YS
- WALLS 6 DA YS
- INSTRUMENT RACKS 51 DA YS
- HARDENED WET WELL VENT 47 DA YS
- MAIN TURBINE 38 DA YS
- LOCAL LEAK RATE TESTING 40 DA YS U2]SSMPR l
i SHORT TERM ACTIONS ENCLOSURE 3 TO JUL Y 23,1992, LETTER.
i EQUIPMENT CORROSION PROBLEMS
?
- 2 WORK COMPLETE
- 1 IN PROGRESS
.)
DEFERRED EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS
\\
- 110F 11 WORK COMPLETE POTENTIAL STRUCTURAL DEFICIENCIES
- 10 WORK COMPLETE
- 5IN PROGRESS BACKLOGS OF TEMPORARY CONDITIONS i
AND OPERATOR WORKAROUNDS
- 6IN PROGRESS
^
l EQUIPMENT DEFICIENCIES DISCO VERED '
i l
DURING WALKDOWN
- 2 IN PROGRESS OTHER
- 3 WORK COMPLETE i
-- 1 IN PROGRESS
SUMMARY
- 26 WORK COMPLETE
- 14 IN PROGRESS m
a e
.f n.
r c..s
... ~..
._.. ;. _,. _ - ~. _
...;_......-.........-.,...-,...-.2,...,..__,...-._._...u..-..__
Y us.~,-.=ss.ua-..=r a,..ua e s s_
_4 t
i 6
t i
I BACKLOG MANAGEMENT l
r o
PROGRESS l
i e
CHARACTERilA110N I
t e
MANAGEMENTAPPROACH
- STRATEGY ESTABLISHMENT OF TARGETS, GOALS, OR STANDARDS
~
b 1
l 1
i.
l:
l-N 1J pwayeiy-ef vq-ygi e-way-*-g-q-iywr-
--wya.-
,-w--u y
y wrm.%.y-7-
w+
9 ee,vsc-y y
- ,w.s-y-
s-e
.g w
q-g
-,+vy-*r=
BACKLOG MANAGEMENT PROGRESS e
IDENTIFICATION OFMATERIAL CONDITION DEFICIENCIES e
CLOSURE OF BACKLOG ITEMS e
BACKLOG (OPEN ITEM) MANAGEMENT
- CATALOGED
- CATEGORIZED
- DEVELOPED STRATEGY BM1
._.a_
_-.----...A
BACKLOG MANAGEMENT BACKLOG CHARACTERIZATION e
BACKLOG REMAINING AFTER STARTUP e
SYSTEMS IMPORTANT TO SAFETY /REUABlUTY e
TYPES OF BACKLOG ITEMS e
PRIORITY e
AGE aus u-l
.......m...
___i__.__.______..______.__.___.__._
CM BACKLOG Thousands
-14 I i
12 10 8
s s J
M
%f
{
..................................'F
..aw%.w.
.,w........
~
,f' i
m
----- -, ~ -- --------------
2 0:
4/21 5/21 6/21 7/21 8/21 9/21 10/21 11/21 12/21 1
i l
i INITIATED
! COMPLETED
- TOTAL + PRE 4/21 L
.,. ~
,w..
-L i
4 i
BACKLOG MANAGEMENT i
BACKLOG CHARACTERIZATION l
^
SYSTEMS IMPORTANT TO SAFETY /REUABlUTY 1.
EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATORS (EDG)
N 2.
DIESEL GENERA TOR EMERGENCY POWER (DGEP) t 3.
SWITCHYARD (SWYD) 4.
INSTRUMENTAIR/ NITROGEN (IA/N) a 6.
REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM (RPS)
{
r 6.
RESIDUAL HEATREMOVAL SYSTEM (RHR) 7.
CONTAINMENT A TMOSPHERIC CONTROL (CA C) (VENTING) 8.
SERVICE WATER (SW) i 9.
PLANTELECTRICAL-(AC) l 11.
PRIMARY CONTAINMENT ISOLA TION SYSTEM (PCIS)
^
- 12. = MAIN STEAM /ELECTROHYDRAUUC CONTROL (MS/ ENC) a 13.
CONDENSATEAND FEEDWATER (C&F) 14.
FIRE SUPPRESSION / DETECTION (FS/D) 15.
HIGH PRESSURE COOLANTINJECTION (HPCI) 16.
TURBINE BUILDING COMPONENT C00UNG WA TER (TBCCW) 17.
REACTOR COREINJECTION C00UNG (RCIC) 18.
AUTOMA TIC DEPRESSURIZA TION SYSTEM / SAFETY REUEF VALVES (ADS /SRV) 19.
STANDBY GAS TREATMENT (SBGT) mm a
=...
BACKLOG MANAGEMENT i
BACKLOG CHARACTERIZATION i
TYPES OF BACKLOG e
CORRECTIVEMAINTENANCE KEY OPERATIONAL ITEMS
- TEWORARY CONDITIONS
- CONTROL ROOM INDICA TORS OUT OF SERVICE (00S)
CAUTION TAGS ENGINEERING WORK /EVALUA TION REQUESTS (EWR/EER) e ADMINISTRA TIVE/ SUPPORT 1
)'
t WORK ACTIVITY PRIORITY TABLE nuGRTTY_
WORK ITEM CATEGORY A. ACTION TO COftRECT AN EXtsTING OR tMMINENT CONDITION INVOLVING NUCLE AR S AFETY WHICH WEL PRESERVE THE HE ALTH AND S ATE TV OF THE PutuIC OR PLANT ET8tSONNEL a
j ACTION TO CORRECT AN Ex! STING COND8 TION WHERE A THREAT OF PERSONNEL NJURY IS IMMINENT.
8.
C. ACTION TO CORRECT AN EXfsTING CONDeflON WHERE A THREAT OF ACUTE R ADtATtON ERPOSURE >5 REM TO AN INotvsOUAL IS SMMENENT.
ACTION TO CORRECT A CONDITIbH WillCH IS M Viot ATION OF A REGtA ATORY REQUIREMENT AND FOR WH3CH COMPENS ATORY ACTION CANNOT BE A.
PROVIDE D.
2 ACTION TO CORRECT A CONolTION WHICH.1F HOT CORRECTED, WILL RESULT IN NEAR TERM l<T DAYSt VIOL ATION OF A REGLA ATORY fttoUeREutNT f oR 8.
wtsCH COMPENSATORY ACTION CANNOT BE PRCVIDED.
C sCTlON REOtMRED TO CORRECT A CONOsitON wesCH SEvtRtY Hp40ERS APPROeRiaTE RESPONSE TO ACCiotNT OR OrtRaTeoNat iRaNsrENTS A. ACTION TO CORRECT A CONDITION WHICH WRL REOutRE IMutDtATE OR NE AR TERM (<7 C AYS) UNET SHUTDOWN OR 56GhiFIC ANT ftEDUCTION EN C APACITY tz 50 MWel.
- ^ c" " " c ""'c' ^ c " "' " **c"
^ '5 5 " " ""
""E***
- 5'"*'-
3 C.
ACTION TO SUPPORT EVAIUAitON OF A CONDITION WH4CH [,4ay SECOME A PRIORITY I ITEM OJ TO CORRECT A CONDIT60N WlftCH N Oft G Em EI Y T O 4
BECout A PRf0RITY 1 ITEM IF NOT ADORESSED A.
ACTION TO St#PPORT EVAtif A flON OF A CONDITBON WHICH [441 SECOME A PRIORITY 2 ITEM M TO CORRICT A CONDf TFON WIstCit M OR g QEE TO BECOML A PHIORITY 2 ITEM IF NOT ADDRESSED.
8 ACTION REQUIRED TO MEET AN EAPitCIT COMMITMENT TO A REGut ATORY AGENCY.
C. ACTION REOutRED TO SUPPORE A PT OR ST.
O. ACTION REOutRED TO MEIT AN EXPtsCIT INPO COMMITMENT.
E.
ACTION MOUfRED TO SUPPORT A PM f N S AFETY RE. ATED EQUIPMENT.
A. ACTION TO SUPPORT EVAtuATION OF A CONOtTION WHICH M4Y BECOME A PRf0RtTV 3A OR 38 8 TEM g TO CORRECT A CONO TION WHtCH g OR Q LE1H TO BECOME A PRIORITY 3 A OR 38 ITEM IF NO F ADDREEMD.
- a. ACTION TO CORRECT A CONDITION WHICH IS CAUSING OR WILL CAUSE OR RESULT IN A NEAR TERA.s g<7 DAYSI UNIT POWER REDUCTaON 25 Mwe.
5 c ^ c " " ' '"'" v5 ""^'"'^"'""^v^*""'"c'"'"'"'"^'"""'"""
"c'""'""'""-
D. ACisON REQu1 RED TO SUPPORT NONREGULATORY REQU: RED TESTING OF POWER PRODUCW,a EOutPMENT.
E.
ACTION REQUIRED TO aurROvf OR MaWTAM UNIT CAPACtTY (INC1UOtNG EFFICIENCY OF POWER PftOOa C*sc totarurNO A. ACTION TO MAMTAIN THE PLANT *$ HARDWARE OR SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION St ACCOROANCE WITH LICENSE REOtMIEMENTS.
6
, ACnO., uOU, RED TO ueET W=TTE, MANAGEufMT TA DARDs OP nRFORMA CE.
7 A, ACTIO80 REQUIRED TO REDUCE CHRONIC RADEATIO88 EXPOSURE TO PERSOessEt 8 ACTiott ItEOutRED TO REDUCE THE POTENTlat FOft R THRE AT TO PERSO8eNEL 5 AFETY.
A. ACTIOff REQUIRED TO SUPPORT A PM 988 acONSAFETY RELATED EQUIPMEstT.
b 8 ACTION REQUsRED TO SUPPOftT NONREGUE ATOPY PEOueRED TESTING OF 980*sPOWE9 PROOUCtNG EOU:PufNT.
A. ANY OTHER ACTION WHtCH HAS SENEFIT.
g
i e
BACKLOG MANAGEMENT BACKLOG CHARACTERIZATION
.I e
APPROXIMATE UNITBREAKDOWN ~
-37%
UNIT 1
- 48%
UNIT 2 l
- 1,5 %
OTHER e
OTHER GENERAL CHARACTERIZATIONS
- 70% CAN BE WORKED DURING OPERATION 1
t I
- 50% OF CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE 'CAN BE ACCOMPL/SHED IN LESS THAN FOUR HOURS
- 20% ARE MINOR MAINTENANCE'
- 20% ARE " SUPPORT" TICKETS a
i T
C
e BACKLOG CHARACTERIZA TION - U1/U2 SYSTEMS (19)IMPORTANT TO SAFETY /REllABILITY (1456)
'*fs ""
umras
~d j
m:-
//
x x
oma
- wgo, v
u t-
BACKLOG CHARACTERIZATION TOTAL INTEGRA TED BACKLOG SAFETY /REUABlUTY SYSTEMS 1456 OTHER SYSTEMS 2647
\\
- s UNCLASSN1ED PRE-STARTUP 1640 5509 ADMINMUPP
-645 L
6C13 i
i L
TEMPORARY CONDITIONS
$YSTEMS IMP 0ftTANT TO SAFETY / RELIABILITY f
Diesel Generator Emergency Power 2
2 EER Temp Change (2) No f
Instrument Air / Nitrogen 1
1 - Clearance > 3 mo.
- (1) No RPS 1
1 EER Temp. Change (1) No RHR 4
1 - Dia. Annunciator (1)Yes 2 - EER Temp. Change (2) No 1
Jumper / Lifted Wire (1) Yes-
=
CAC (venting) 3 3 - EER Tepp Change (3) No Service Water 3
2 EER _dap. Change (2) No 1 - Clearance > 3 me.
(1) No i
DC Power 2
- 2 EER Temp.' Change (1)Yes-(1) No Plant Electrical 22 18'. Temporary Poeer-
l Main Steam /EHC 0
Condensate and Feedwater 0
Fire Suppression / Detection 1
1 - EER Temp. Change-(1) Yes.
HPCI i
1 - EER Temp. Change
_ (1) No-TBCCV-0 RCIC 1-1 - EER Temp.' Change-(1) No ADS /SRV
-5 2 - LCO's > 3 months.
. (2) No 3
EER Temp. Change-(3) No1
-i SBCT 0
L r
r se e
w' w tr w+,-**w vr
",e
--ev--m+-
te
,ewmem
+,m
-r tm*-w9--
+y-~
t
" vw., -,
re-r^
=
A.w 4m Ame*
__m.
ma, A hm m. A m mmh h hB.4_Mm A d m W hh -'
hhe.1
--%ea. -a m-r-wam - aw y--w-pw,,m-.-m-,-y------_wy----
e r
D Ov.,s Y,.
e o
g
.s
- r.,
j r
e
.z
/
/
..jg 7
',g 4
/
n" b
y s
/
e g
p
,/
8
[;;
/
9 s;.1 9
e h
f-
/
g n,,g s A
j p
'///
f.1
^
f j
?
/
I
[
'N N,
\\
N s
's
\\'s, s
\\
\\
\\
x.s N
\\
\\
's
\\
\\
\\
h.
\\
\\s
4 BACKl.OG CHARACTERIZA TION AGE VERSUS PRIORITY (SYSTEMS IMPORTANT TO SAFETY / RELIABILITY) t I
i 250 ze 150 100
$0 0
%3 4
v Q
-..,,, -,...,. - - -...,,, - ~, -,., - - -,..,.,
~
., -, -. - ~. - -,,.., - ~ -. - -
l BACKLOG MANAGEMENT OPEN ITEM STRATEGY e
HIGHEST MANAGEMENT FOCUS ON INDIVIDUAL BACKLOG ITEMS FOR THE FOLLOWING CA TEGORIES:
PRIORITY 1-4 ITEMS FOR SYSTEMS IMPORTANT TO SAFETY /REllABILITY HIGH PRIORITY (1,2, or 3) ITEMS FOR ALL SYSTEMS KEi'(TEMS o
TEMPORARY CONDITIONS o
CONTROL ROOM INDICA TORS OUT OF SERVICE o
CAUTION TAGS sus
_____________.__________.____________________________________________.__.___.__________________________m
h
- \\
BACKLOG MANAGEMENT i
OPENITEM STRATEGY I
i e
APPROACH FOR ALL MCKLOGITEMS MANAGENEWITEMSIDENilflED USE SYSTEM ENGINEERS SCHEDULE BASED ON i
o SYSTEM o
PRIORITY o
AGE' o
REQUIRED PLANT CONDITIONS o-RELATED WORK IMPLEMENTPROGRAMS TO REDUCENUMBER OFNEWITEMS o
CORROSION PROBLEM o
MATERIAL CONDITIONINSPECT10NR o
RECURRING EQUIPMENT FAILURE PROGRAM IMPROVE WORK PROCESS EFFICIENCY-o MINOR MAINTENANCE o
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING o
WORK CONTROL PROCESS -
ENHANCE ABILITY TO TRACK AND REPORTITEMS i
aus '
...p
~ ^ ^
-m
..E v-
.m.re,i mwi
l l
BACKLOG MANAGEMENT ESTABLISHMENT OF TARGETS, GOALS, OR STANDARDS L
THE TYPES OF TARGET, GOALS, OR STANDARDS BEING CONSIDERED ARE:
e ABSOLUTENUMBER OFITEMS e
NUMBER OFITEMS BASED ON:
SYSTEMIMPORTANCE
- 14tf0RITY i
- AGE WORK GROUP e
AGELIMITS e
TARGET CURVES
'i (NUMBER vs AGE) 1 P
+
.-....a.-
,. _..,, :_..'..~.-.,
4 1
v BACKLOG MANAGEMENT i
ESTABLISHMENT OF TARGETS, GOALS, OR STANDARDS --
e THE 3 YEAR PLAN INITIA TIVE MILESTONES ARE:
1
- TARGET /STANDARDSIDENTFIED BY 1/31/93 FOR HIGHESTFOCUS CATEG0KIES
- TARGETS / STANDARDS IDENTiffED BY 2/28/93 FOR
. t OTHER CATEGORIES e
THE Vis/0NIS:
TO HA VE NO KEY OPERA TIONAL ITEMS OLDER.
THAN ONE CYCLE TO MANAGE THE HIGHEST FOCUS CATEGORYiTEMS TO STANDARDS BEGINNINGIMMEDIATELY TO ELIMINA TE THE EXCESS OF OTHB BACKLOGI CA TEGORIES OVER THE NEXT THREE YEARS _
}
i
-]1?
f 9
p Pdrt k
w P Fp 4-es
++v;hTy
=ri-ey(y
>,wp+-'pwrp-wq mai' M--rP'S w-r+w-re p
,+ se e.
'tu
-- *t e m se etM m
-*f 9*W9
-1 4
-'+'ht-'9-"w--m' rw 4-ew 1 W s
BNP IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- MA TERIAL CONDITION
- RELATED ACTIVITIES e APPROACH e PROGRESS AND PLANS e RESULTS l
l
BNP IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- MATERIAL CONDITION e
RELATED ACTIVITIES
- PREVIOUS HOTSIDE/COLDSIDE WALKDOWNS
- ESTABLISHMENT OF MODEL ROOMS
- PN-30 PROCESS
- SYSTEMREVIEWS
- OUTAGE SCOPE MANAGEMENT
- BACKLOG MANAGEMENT
- CORPORATEINITIATIVES 11 AND 12
- BACKLOG REDUCTION, MATERIAL CGNDITION 89MC11
.5 BNP IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- MA TERIAL CONDITION e
APPROACH 1
- DISCIPLINED TEAMS WELL-TRAINED MULTI-DISCIPLINED
- IDENTIFY /CORRECTMINOR MAINTENANCEITEMS
- IDENTIFYPROCESSIMPROVEMENTS
- INSPECT WITH CONSIST?NTHIGH STANDARDS armera
=
0, i
BNP IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- MA TERIAL CONDITION i
e PROGRESS AND PLANS 1
\\
- WORK PLAN-COMPLETE UNIT 2 BY FEBRUARY 1,1993
- COMPLETE UNIT 1 BY april 1,1993
?
- PLAN FOR REMAINING AREAS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES
- A 46, INSPECTIONS (SEISMIC QUALIFICATIONS y
UTILITY GROUP CRITERIA)-
l
- Al-96, DRYWELL INSPECTION AND STARTUP CHECKLIST
- Al-114, MANAGEMENTFIELD WALKDOWNS
- MANAGEMENTINSPECTIONS DURING STARTUP'
- HOT / PRESSURIZED INSPECTIONS o
k DY apeses r t
4,.
I o
j 12/14 12/21 12/28 1/4 1/11 1/18 1/25 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIil Control Room' l--!
RWCU Pump Room B l---l RWCU Pu=p Room A I---l SJAE Room A l----l U2 Main Steam Line Tunnel l-l U2 TIP Roon l-l U2 Torus.
l-l SJAE Room B l---l U2 Condensate Booster Pump Room l---l U2 Condensate Pit I---l I-----I U2 Condenser 20' & 45' l---!
U2 Drywell I-----I Feed Pump Room A
.l-----I Feed Pump Room B l-----l U2 20' Mini Steam Tunnel l-l U2 77' Pump & Valve Room l----l U2 Heater Drain Pump Rooms l------l U2 50MSIY Pit l--[
U2 RUCU Heat Exchanger I---!
U2 Spent Fuel Fool Cooling heat l---l Exchanger i
Feedwater Hester Room A l-----l Feedwater Heater Room B l-----l
.l WLKDOWNS,JPC 4,
C
=-
BNP IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- MA TERIAL CONDITION e
RESULTS
- NO OPERABillTYISSUES
- 1594 SUBSTANDARD CONDITIONS
- 14 ENGINEERING WORK REQUESTS UNDER 14-DA Y REVIEW amcu L
4
..m.
e l
(
RESUL TS j
TOTAL ITEMS: 1594 MINOR MAINTENANCE 63 %
WORK REQ / JOB ORDERS 16 %
ENG WORK REQUESTS 21%
.v.
y O
RESUL TS
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,c, 7
uan - a ouanino n
/,
/
/
HARDWARE 26%
76 hNNNNNNNNNI c-ss M
macuvAcsnus s>
(NN
~~'~
- - nous-
~ -.
^
r RESULTS 1
i fs
\\
\\
v HARDWARE 32%
4.
EWRs 21%'
HOUSEKEEPnfG 8%
lllllll/
HVACSUPPORT 5%
- may, 16 %
P1FmfG SUFFORT 13%
~
uwoRmAmEmace c
.s3%
ELECTRXAl 23%
\\
'orneR 1s%
- WORK REQUESTS / JOB ORDERS 1
JW30E72 i.. '
e s
.,y-.
4.,
.. ~, --,.
~~.
,,...,w~
.,.. ~ _.., _ _. _
s 4
4 4
Startup Readiness Review:
7 4
Y Satisfy Startup Criteria
-- Line management self-assessment l
L
- Independent Assessment (NAD)
]
Y Confirm Startup' Readiness in a meeting with NRC management l
=
Special Control and 0versight Processfor startup
/andpower ascension' l
l t
~I i
}.e t
4
{
16errvw.ere -
3F
~
s
+ l ?n e +
,---s mane -
w r
- '., -a cNd m
+-,-,--4.
.,5 e,
r
,c, e, -,. - - - - - -,.- -,, -,4
0 9
Startup Readiness Review Brunswick' Unit 2 Startup Criteria:
I. CAL Items
- Enclosure 3 (7/23/92)
- Diesel Generator Repairs and Testing II. System Reviews
- Operability /ReliabilityImpact
- Complete Unit 2 Stanup Required Work IV. Operator Training
- Plant Modificaticas
- Augmented Startup Procedures
- Approach to Criticality
- Power Operation and Emergency Response III. Special Controls and Increased Oversight
- Infrequent Evolution Controls
- Augmented Startup Checklists
- Augmented General Operating Procedures -
- Management On-Shift 16crb4.ar
w l-Startup Readiness ' Review.
Brunswick ' Unit 2 Line Management Self-Assessment How it will be done:
Three-Element Approach to Self-Assessment and Accountability:-
- 1. Functional Area Assessments-1
- 2. Plant Issues Assessments
- 3. Assessments of Current Performance 16sel2A.str 4-y 9
<' ~
r-4,
Bnmswick Unit 2 Startup Readiness Review Line Managernent Self-Assessment How it wit' he done: (cont'd)
- 1. Functional Area Assessments Issues specific to one organizational unit that are either normally evaluated prior to startup or have been identined as an area needing i
r i
l improvement.
l l
Example performance issues:
q Operations
" control of component position" i
Maintenance
" supervisory development and oversight" Technical Support
" support for upgrade of f
plant material condition" j
i 16 sal 25.sn I
L
Brunswick Unit 2 Startup Readiness Review Line Management Self-Assessment t
How it will be done: (cont'd) l
(
l
- 2. Plant Issue Assessments Issues that have been identified as needing improvement applicable to more than one organizational unit.
1 Example plant issues:
" Corrective Action Effectiveness"
" Material Condition Standards"
" Effective teamwork and productivity" i
t I
16anc.m l
l l
O -
. I,o' ;
i Startup Readiness Review Brunswick Unit 2 Line Management Self-Assessment How it will.be done: (cont'd)
- 3. Assessments of Current Performance -
Contemporary issues that provide the opportunity to evaluate current performance to determine future performance capability.
Example current performance issues:
" Safe Shutdown Risk management and execution"
" Effectiveness of Correcting Emerging Problems"
" Component / System Operability Determinations" 16 sal 2d arr :
4
r Startup Readiness Review Brunswick Unit 2 INPO First Visit-
-L PN-30 System Review Process
- Schedule Review Second Visit
-- Implementation of PN-30
-Return Visit (Planned)
- Sample System Review for Readiness Full-Scope INPO Evaluation-
- Scheduled January 11 - 22 16inpo.srt
'U^
q
.+,4
-g
Startup Readiness Review Bninswick Unit 2 Special Control and Oversight During Startup and Power Ascension Infrequent Evolution - INPO 91-1 Plant Management On-Shift Augmented Normal Startup Readiness Checklists
=
- Special Pre-Requisites
- SpecialInspections and Area Closecuts
" People / Program Readiness Issue" Completion Augmented Normal Startup and Operating Procedures
- Special Testing
- Assessment Hold-Points 16 epa.wr
q BRONSWICKINAD STARTUP READINESS ASSESSMENT
- PURPOSE ADVISE THE SENIOR V. P. NUCLEAR AND CP&L CORPORATE SENIOR MANAGEMENT OF THE READINESS OF BNP TO 5
RESTART 4
- HOW
- ASSESSMENTPLAN TARGETED TO ADDRESS PROBLEM:
AREAS AND PLANT OPERATIONS
- USEPERSONNEL WITH EXTENSIVENUCLEAR' EXPERIENCE
~
l i
i i-
. myst4
~
-. k
.+
r n
BRUNSWICK NAD STARTUP READINESS ASSESSMENT e INVOI.VEMENT.
- MAJOR ONG0 LNG NAD EFFORT FOCUSSED ON BNP
- EXPERIENCED NAD READINESS ASSESSMENT TEAM
- TEAM LEADERSHIP.
LOFUN/BRADLEY
- FIVE NON CP&L 0 NRC, INPD, PLANT MANAGEMENT
- TEN CP&L 0 SEVEN SRO O OPERA TIONS MGT, MAINTENANCE MGT, ENG. MGT
=
BNSRAP4
BRUNSWICK NAD STARTUP READINESS ASSESSMENT e PHASEI. NOVEMBER 2,1992 TO JANUARY 31,1993 TARGETAREAS:
PLANTMATERIAL CONDITION PERSONNEUPROGRAM READINESS NRC/NAD ISSUES e PHASEII. FEBRUARY 1,1993 TO FEBRUARY 12, 1993 TARGETAREAS:
PLANTMATERIAL CONDITION.
PEOPLE PROCEDURES / PROCESSES e PHASEIll. FEBRUARY 13,1993 TO STARTUP TARGETAREAS:
ISSUE FOLLOW-UP
[
l
BRUNSWICK NAD STARTUP READINESS ASSES-MENT S
- PHASEI.
MATERIAL CONDITION 1.
BACKLOG CATEGORIZATION ll.
NED/CIVIUSTRUCTURAL lit. SYSTEMS WALKDOWNS IV.
OPERATOR WORK-AROUNDS l
V.
TEMPORARY CONDITIONS VI. WELDING ASSESSMENT l
l BNSRAP1 l
BRUNSWICK NAD STARTUP READINESS ASSESSMENT e PHASEI. (Cont):
PERSONNEUPROGRAM READINESS 1.
TRAINING ASSESSMENT l1.
SIMULA TOR OBSERVA TIONS.
Ill.
EP ASSESSMENT IV.
PROGRAM REVIEWS-V.
SHUTDOWN RISK MANAGEMENT NRC/NAD ISSUES
'FOR UNRESOLVED ISSUES, ASSESS ADEQUACY.
OF THE 3 YEAR PLANINITIATIVES avsn m x
~
4 BRUNSWICK NAD STARTUP READINESS ASSESSMENT e PHASEII.
l.
OPERA TIONS
- 11. SURVELLLANCEAND TESTING ll1.
PLANT SELF-ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES IV.
MANAGEMENT ORGANIZA TION V.
MAINTENANCE VI. STARTUP TESTPROGRAM Vll. ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT l
" " "'* I g
o BRUNSWICK NAD STARTUP READINESS ASSESSMENT e PHASE 111.
1.
ISSUE FOLLOW-UP ll.
EMERGENTISSUE RESOLUTION ll1.
MONITORING OF STARTUP ACTIVITIES avswa
INDEPENDENT ADVICE
- NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW COMMITTEE
- ADVISES SITE V. P.
- PLANT, CORPORATE, EXTERNAL REPRESENTATION
- FUNCTIONAL FEBRUARY 5,1993
- NUCLEAR SAFETY OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
- ADVISES CP&L PRESIDENT
- EXTERNAL REPRESENTATION
- FUNCTIONAL MARCH,1993
- NUCLEAR ASSESSMENTDEPARTMENT
- ADVISES SENIOR V. P. NUCLEAR & CORPORATE SENIOR MANAGEMENT
- PERMANENT STAFF, SUPPLEMENTED WITH EXTERNAL EXPERIENCE msw
?'
. s -.
.9x Schedulefor Startup Readiness January i
6Jan Startup Pandmana Review Plan 11Jan INPO &had"1~I Evaluation Begins Senior Management 22Jan INPO Ev=h2=rie= Debrief Review Meeting (System Reedmess)
Self-A===r3/Ar==*W1ity 26Jan
=
PlantIssues Cunad Performance MP Raults/Ah February
, y,,
5Feb Pmposed NRC Pmgms: Meeting 10Feb INPO Exit 12Feb NAD Phase IIDebrief Senior Management Review Meeting Self-A -tA--Mity
=
Pime*wmal Area Plant Issues -
21Feb NRC TW Begins w w.-
25Feb Area Closeuut/ Valve Imeups Begin MPO/NAD Results/Adoes March Senior Management.
Review Meeting (18 Mar) ^"* Cl "* "8/Y"IV* % C '"P ***
Self-A "a'""dA """*t7 I
Functional Ana (19 Mar) NRC Meeting - Reg. II Concurrence PlantIssues -
- I"I""
L' 21 Mar Initial Criticality INPO/NAD Results/ Actions
-tg L
April p
3Apr FullPower i
"E k
4
.