ML20127G137
| ML20127G137 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/19/1985 |
| From: | Zwolinski J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Vandewalle D CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| References | |
| LSO5-85-06-023, LSO5-85-6-23, NUDOCS 8506250363 | |
| Download: ML20127G137 (8) | |
Text
r-
' UNITED STATES 8
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
- p WASHING 10N, D. C. 20555
%,,, g #
June 19, 1985 Docket No. 50-155 LS05-85-06-023 Pr. Devid J. VandeValle Director, Nuclear Licensing Consumers Power Company 1945 West Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201
Dear Mr. VandeWalle:
SUBJECT:
IN PROGRESS AUDIT PLAN FOR THE DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW (DCRDR)
Re:
Big Rock Point We are in receipt of your letter dated May 31, 1985, Big Rock Point Plant -
Control Room Design Review Schedule Update - Integrated Plan Issue 5.
This letter serves to notify you that the Human Factors Engineering Branch staff plans an in-progress audit of the Big Rock Point Control Room. The aurpose of this audit is to clarify portions of the review process and to confirm the review is being conducted appropriately via an evaluation of the results of the review to date.
Based on the scheduled refueling shutdown date of September 1,1985, the audit will be conducted during the dates of September 16-19, 1985.
The staff will audit your efforts related to your Detailed Control Room Design Review and the Safety Parameter Display Systen. The staff will conduct the audit in the sequence described in the enclosed plan.
In preparation for the audit, please make the following arrangements:
1.
Make available any DCRDR team personnel for a discussion or responses to NRC Audit Team questions during the audit.
2.
Provide documentation of the review results to date, including HEDs identified, and all results from review products (surveys, data collection forms, analyses, etc.).
3.
Provide control room access for the NRC staff and its contractors.
The NRC also requests clearance for camera equipment to be brought on-site. The equipment will be used to take photographs in the control room and other areas which may assist in the evaluation and documentation of the DCRDR.
4 Provide the NRC Audit Team with a conference' room / office space for private meetings s well as meetings with plant staff, f5,fl{h
r Mr. David J. VandeWalle o Because of the scope of the audit, the FPC anticipates it will require four full days of effort.
If you should have any questions regarding this request or the general contents o' the Audit, please contact Mr. T. S.
Rotella, Pro.iect Panager, Big Rock Point Plant, or me.
Sincerely, 4
John
. Zwolinski, Chief Operatino Reactors Branch No. 5 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc W/ enclosure:
See next page I
F Mr. David J. VandeWalle Big Rock Point Plant Consumers Power Company cc Mr. Thomas A. McMish, Secretary Cersurers Power Company Pl? West Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49.701
-Judd L. Bacon, Esquire Consumers Power Company 212 West Michipan Avenue Jackscn, Michigan 49201 Bic Rock Point Plant ATTN: Mr. Dave Hoffnan Plant Superintendent Charlevoix, Michfoan 497?O Mr. I. Lee Moerland Chairman, Poard of Commissioners P. O. Rox 218 Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Office of the Governor Poon 1 - Capitol Building Lansing, Michigan 48913 Regional Adninis+ratnr Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section Office Division of Radiological Health P. O. Box 30035 Lensing, Michigan 48909 Pesident Inspector Pig Rock Point Plant c/n U.S. URC PP #3, Pcx 600 Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 0
L_
r AUDIT PLAN DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW IN-PROGRESS AUDIT BIG ROCK POINT A.
ENTRY BRIEFING:
1.
NRC a.
Provide background for audit:
State NRC requirements Restate staff comment on Program Plan a
b.
Define and discuss agenda c.
Discuss reporting of audit results.
2.
Big Dock Point
~4 a.
Provide status of DCRDR b.
Define modifications to Program Plan, if any c.
Define and discuss audit schedule.
B.
CONTROL ROOM ORIENTATION (Conducted by licensee) 1.
Brief tour of control room for NRC Audit Team 2.
Definition and location of engineered safeguard systems, including controls and instrumentation 3.
Definition and location of instruments to monitor the following critical safety functions:
a.
Reactivity Control, b.
Reactor core cooling and heat removal to the isolation condensers, c.
Reactor core coolant system integrity, d.
Radioactivity control, e.
Containment conditions.
L
F 4
2 4.
Definition and location of instruments used to monitor entry symptoms to emergency operation procedures C.
AUDIT ELEMENTS OF DCRDR 1.
Evaluate the DCRDR Team qualifications and the DCRDR Program a.
Qualifications of members of the review team b.
Need for formal program of HF orientation and training for non-HF specialists c.
The role, responsibilities, and level of effort of the human factors specialists, and for other team members d.
Documentation and document control 2.
Audit methods used in the Function and Task Analyses:
a.
Detailed description and discussion of how the operator's information and control needs and their associated characteristics are determined b.
Evaluate records and documents associated with (a) 3.
Control Room Inventory:
Evaluate methodology for comparing existing control room instrumentation with required display and control characteristics 4
Audit Control Room Survey:
a.
Evaluate survey lists and checklists b.
Evaluate survey procedures c.
Evaluate survey team d.
Evaluate review of Remote Shutdown Panel 5.
Audit HED Assessment:
a.
Reviewmethodology, criteria,andguidelinesusepin assessment process.
b.
Evaluate results from assessment process c.
Evaluate schedule of HED corrective actions u
I~
3 6.
Audit Selection of Design Improvements:
a.
Review methodology used to identify design improvements b.
Audit specific design improvements c.
Evaluate role of human factors specialist in the design improvements process 7.
Audit Verification Activities that Illustrate HEDs are Corrected:
a.
Evaluate methodology used b.
Evaluate results from verification activities 8.
Audit Verification Activities Which Illustrate that Improvements Do Not Introduce New HEDs:
a.
Evaluate methodology used b.
Evaluate results which illustrate that improvements do not introduce new HEDs 9.
Audit Coordination of the DCRDR With Other Supplement 1. NUREG-0737 Initiatives:
a.
Evaluate coordination methodology b.
Evaluate results from coordination effort
- 10. NRC Audit Team Evaluation of One or More Panels in the Big Rock Point Control Room:
a.
Conduct a benchmark evaluation of licensee's review process by independently identifying HEDs b.
Request Big Rock Point to show where HEDs defined in Step (a) were found in the DCRDR
- 11. Review of Activities Which Impact DCRDR:
a.
Results from Probabilistic Risk Assessment b.
Results from operator survey (if applicable)
L
_4 12.
Review Big Rock Point's Results on the Need for a Safety Parameter Display System:
a.
Evaluate methodology used b.
Evaluate results in terms of the physical location of instruments within the control room D.
EXIT BRIEFING 1.
NRC Audit Team:
a.
State preliminary findings from audit b.
Discuss reporting of Audit Results 2.
Big Rock Point:
a.
Comments on preliminary findings.
9 i
L_
r Mr. David J. VandeWalle June 19, 1985 Because of the scope of the audit, the NRC anticipates it will require four full deys of effort.
If you should have any questions regarding this request or the general contents of the Audit, please contact Mr. T. S.
Rotella, Project Manager, Big Rock Point Plant, or me.
Sincerely.
Original signed by John A. Zwolinski, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 Division of Licensing Enclesure:
As stated cc w/ enclosure:
See next page DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC PDR Local PDR ORBf5 Reading HThompson OELD Edordan RGrimes JPartlow TRotella CJamerson WRegan SWeiss LBeltracchi ACRS (10) 1 DL:0RB#5
/ DL:0RB#5 s%k DL:0RB#5 CJamerson TRotella:tm JZwolinski 06/g/85 06//$/85 06/(d/85
~-
. - _ _