ML20127C646
| ML20127C646 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/28/1985 |
| From: | Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Dircks W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127C643 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-292 NUDOCS 8504100663 | |
| Download: ML20127C646 (1) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _
i
'o UNITED STATES 8,
A NUCLEAR RESULATORY COMMISSION s
I wassimoyow. o. C. acess February 28, 1985 CHAIRMAN MEMORANDUM FOR:
U211iam J.
Dircks Executive Director for Operdtions 7
7 FROM:
Nunzio J.
Palladino
[
SUBJECT:
JANUARY 4, 1985 MEMORANDUd FROM THE PRESIDENT ON REGULATORY PROGRAMS I understand that this was assigned to you for appropriate l
action.
Please let me know what is your proposed course of l
l action for the Commission.
l cc:
Commissioner Roberts Cor.1ssioner Asselstine Commissioner Berr. thal Com.issioner Zech SECY OGC l
OPE j
l lis:'c Off. EDO D t e....'.. 7...'.,,.,===
lime......ifi....:mee c gpL-(i)b 1
O EDO --- 03n395
3 f
- /
\\
UNITED STATES
!{
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION waseu= crow.o.c.nsas k.CW September 21, 1981 The Honorable George Bush Vice President of the United States Washington, D.C.
20501 I
Dear Mr. Vice President:
Igresponding to your March 25. 1981 letter to former Chairman Hendrie.
You asked that NRC comply with the spirit of Executive Order 12291 and adhere voluntarily to Sections 2 and 3 of the Order for upcoming major regulations.
We support the purposes and objectives of the Order.
We agree that there is a need for a better understanding of the benefits and costs of regulatory requirements.
We have asked our staff to conduct a study to identify particular changes that, consistent with our responsibilities under the Atomic Energy Act, would bring our procedures and practices more in line with
,c Sections 2 and 3 of the Order.
of this study.
I will keep you informed of the results Because of MRC's status as an independent agency, we believe that submitting rules and regulatory analyses to DMS for review prior to publication would not be appropriate.
As an alternative to prepublica-tion clearance, we note that OMB is free to review and coment on any public NRC rulemaking action.
We will consider DMB views, as we have in the past, along with other public comments and agency views.
Sincerely.
DbR 1
Nunzio J. Palladino
,f
)
{
'i',?_)UU I
ENCi.0SURE C
)