ML20126M823

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That Interim Review of Westinghouse Owners Group Submittal Re Action Plan Item I.C.1, Guidance for Evaluation & Development of Procedures for Transients & Accidents, Is Complete.Further Work Necessary
ML20126M823
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 06/11/1981
From: Youngblood B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Counsil W
NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO.
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-1.C.1, TASK-TM NUDOCS 8106220254
Download: ML20126M823 (2)


Text

g * '-

3 7-

>p

-n. y

=q

-mpy.

y y

,37 gy y e..

.r,y et g;

y s.

p Dist.

w g g g-x 3 11381 LB#1 Rdg bec:

DEisenhut TERA BJYoungblood

'NRC/PDR JGrant L/PDR MRushbrook NSIC Docket No.:

50 423 RTedesco TIC RVoller ACRS (16)

TMurley

u. W. G. Coursil RMattson r

Vice President Nuclear Encineerina RMattson and Operations

~

~

WJohnston Mortheast Huclear Eneroy Company OELD 00st Office Box 270 0IE (3)

Hartford, Connecticut 06101

Dear Mr. Counsil:

Subject:

Staff Evaluation of Iten I.C.1 for Westinghcu:e Facilities We have_ completed our interim review of the Westinghouse Owners Group submittal for Action Plan iten I.C.1, Guidance for the Evaluation and Development of Procedures for Transients and Accidents. A cocy of Mr. Eisenhut's flay 23, 1981 letter to !!r. Jurgensen, Chairman, Westing-house Owners Group is enclosed for your information. As indicated in the enclosure, further work will be necessary in order to produce a decurent which satisfies the staff positions in a timely matter.

Sincerely, Ned by I* 7.Youngblood G. J. Youncblood, Chief Licensing Branch No.1

,c i

,,;\\v Division of Licensing g

?m Q

Q c/ v t /.. W \\Y\\

r

Enclosure:

ff*

As' stated b-bl/

(9)

G U UN j'g IO87 t*,..

((!%

cc:

See next page f

5 4.

%+=@g $

Q."7mf MGUMIDR'l DOChi BlCC?'l

  • See previous yellow.

~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~~~~~

DETLB F1-- ~~DDEB? f7

  • JGrant/ys, BJYo'ungblood 6/ /81 6/ /81 a.

n.

u._

~ -.. ~: r q~~ ~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~ -

~

b 8106 22 n0Yl NN

~

r Mr. W. G. Counsil cc: Mr. John 'J. Xorkosz, Manager Mr. H. R. Nims, Manager City of Chicopee Electric Nuclear Products Light Department Northeast Utilities Service Company 725 Front Street P. O. Box 270 Chicopee, Massachusetts 01014 Hartford, Connecticut 06101

. Mr. James E. Tribble Mr. James R. Himmelwright Assistant.to the President Northeast Utilities Service Company New England Electric System P. O. Box 270 20 Turnpike Road.

- Hartford, Connecticut 06101 Westborough, Massachusetts 06508 Resident Inspector / Millstone NPS Mr. Bruce R. Garlick c/o V. S. NRC Manager, Energy Supply P. O. Drawer KK Fitchburg Gas and Electric ~

Niantic, Connecticut 06357

~ Light Company 655 Main Street Fitchburg, Massachusetts 01421 Mr. Wardman K. Brooksbank, Manager Town of South Hadley Electric Light Department 85 Main Street South Hadley, Massachusetts 01075 Mr. Ralph'H Wood General Counsel Public Service Company of New Hampshire 1000 Elm Street Manchester, New Hampshire 03101 William H. Cuddy, Esq.

Day, Barry & Howard One Constitution Plaza Hartford, Connecticut 06103 John D. Fassett, Vice President The United Illuminating Company 80 Temple Street New Haven, Connecticut 06508 e

t

,,,m

~,.,,,r--'r 9

rw = m -

v*-~t' w--+w-&+-e1---*

    • m'*<-'-**'e-+-
  • -r+-+

--e*+'w--****v'--*+-+-+-**--='***r--*a

~~~'--'*-~~+--+r--

~ * " * * ' ' * ' ~ '

N $l$No ? O Y 4

NUC L E AR R E GULA TOiw CC,'.".*lSSION l,

ls f (*y,.. J ';

v. ASHINGTON. O. C M55
,l,4, b, 5 2
vj - w /

=,,, a.N.

  • p r, FAY 2 8 1931 g".....*

Robert W, Jurgensen, Chairman Westincnouse Csners Group American Electric Power Service Corporation 2 Broadway

!!es York, !?ew York 10004

Dear Mr. Jurgensen:

18,1981 (CE-54), you su=arized a meetinc In your letter dated Marchbetween representatives of the t;RC staff, held on February 20, 1981 Tne purocse Westinghouse C"aners, and Westingnouse Electric Corocration.

of tne meeting' was to discuss the Westingneuse Craners Group.(WO3) activities in response to t?UREG-0737, Clarification of TMI Action Plan Re:uirements. Item I.C.1, Guidance for the Evaluation and Develop-Foli wing the mening ment of Procedures for Transients and Accidents. summary tne program described in the meeting.

As indicated in a meeting witn Tem Anderson, of Westinghcuse, on April 1931, we nave concerns about tne acceptaoiiity of the WOG Ina:ect. ate C re Cooiing Guidelines, recuired tne coerator program.

Subse:uent failures were, essentially, adcressed oy entry in::

a soecifi:

e ~. e n As indi;ated in the lines.

one of the inace:uate core cooling guidelines.

orovice smootn transitions from the event crocedures t This operator if subsecuent multiple or c:nsecuential f ailures o Furtnerm:re, tne inadeouate Core Cooling Guidelines are reached.

guidelines co not adcress suosecuent reevaluation of plant condi icns to ensure that tne expected plant resconse is occurring.

Our second concern is your proposec schedule for comole:ing the program recocnizing that development of emergency operating crocedures is aHowev cynamic process with no aosolute end point.

that continual, major rewriting of emergency coerating procedures is a burden on plant operating staffs and confusing to tne ocerators who In the February meeting, WOG representa-must reiearn the procedures.

tives indicated thay tney expect to have the initial deveicoment chase of tne guidelines cor.aleted in July 1931, and would not ex:ect major cnanges.o tne guidelines to resuit f r:m tne tuses te be ccn:leted in You also sta:e in your iet.er that tne January 1932 and July 1982.adcress over 95 cer:ent of tne total risk.

However, we were also told in tne meeting that tne guidelines t initial onase will Consicering our concerns with tne existing guidelines, as addressec acave, we do not see hcw the July submittai can ce res::nsive to

~

We relieve that tWREG-0737, Item I.C.1 wi thout sicnifi cant chance.

~

additional w;rk is necessary.

f U

g od(0Y

- MAY 2 s 10 s:

Ine staff has not completed its review of WCAP 969i or the probability estimates cresented in the February meeting, and the Owners Group nas not addressed the broad range of initiating events, in:1uding natural enenomena such as earthquakes, in the analysis cresented to date.

Inerefore, we cannot assess tne overall adequacy of the proo sed Uniess our concerns, as stated herein, are satisfied, the program.

ability of licensees to meet the schedule for revising their procedures may ce ccmcromisec.

As indicated in tne April 8,1981 meeting, we nave serious coubts that tne full range of initiating events and suosecuent failures can ce adcressed within the event soecific f ramework adooted by tne Westing-house Owners Grouo.

If your additional work to date crovices nore insight into. resolution of these concerns, we would be available to meet witn you at your convenience.

By cc:y of this letter, each licensee and apolicant.cf-a Westinghause-type 013nt, is being advised of our evaluation of jour submittal.

Sincerely, LlR'

& & )) (_iser. hut, Director

.]b

'o Carrell G.

Division of Licersing cc:

E. 'br;ny W Licensees 2 Applicants e

l

. ~,

.