ML20126F553

IE Insp Rept 50-344/81-01 on 810105-08.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint,Surveillance,Design, Design Changes & Mods,Response to IE Bulletins & Circulars & Followup on Previous Insp Items

ML20126F553
Person / Time
Site:	Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date:	01/29/1981
From:	Carlson J, Andrea Johnson, Sternberg D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20126F550	List: ML20126F549 ML20126F553
References
50-344-81-01, 50-344-81-1, NUDOCS 8103180913
Download: ML20126F553 (5)

See also: IR 05000344/1981001

Text

.

.

U. 5. !;CCLEAR RECUL\ TORY CO!'MISSIC t

CETIcF OF I::SPECTICl? Al?D E!:Fo?.CE!'E!TE

RECIo:t v

Report lio. 50-344/81-01

Docket !!o . 50-344 License no. NPF-1 safeguards Group

Licensee: Portland General Electric Company

121 S. W. Salmon Street

Portland, Oregon 97204 .

Facility !!ame: Trojan

Inspection at: Rainier, Oregon

Inspection conducted: January 5-8, 1981

W DrN/ <, l.,,s. /n hCrh 'O j/

Inspectors: _

'

Ac7

,

J. D. Carlson, , Reactor Inspector ' bate Signed

/'b i , sn.s., -

1l7, lg

/ '/Date Signed

~

A. D. Jchnson,' Reactor Inspector

,,

~

Date Signed

O / ,V j

g/l % [CxC}4,vv 4,-

,

s. j

Approved 3y: '

'

A9/P/

D. :: Sternberg, Chief, Reactpf' Project :,ection 1 Date signed

.

Reactcr Operations and iluclear Support dranch

Instnction on January ~-C, 1981 (Recort No. 50-344/81-01)

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of maintenance; surveillance;

cesign, design changes, and modifications; response to IE Bulletins and Circulars

and followup on previous inspection items; also included independent inspection

effo rt. The inspection involved 40 inspector hours onsite by two !!RC inspectors.

Results: No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.

.

.

a.

'

RV F rm 219 (2)

0%3

.

.

. . - - . - - - - - - ,

.-

.

DETAILS -

-

1. ' Persons Contacted-

C.- P. Yundt, General Manager '

• C. A. Olmstead, Manager, Technical Services -

• R. P. Barkhurst, Manager, Operations and Maintenance

• J. D. Reid, Manager, Plant Services

R. P. Schmitt, Engineering Supervisor

• M. R. Snook, OA Supervisor (Acting) ,

• R. Susee, Training Supervisor

"

• D. L. Bennett, Control & Electrical Supervisor - t

• R. L. Steele, Manager, Nuclear Project Eng.

'

.

• S. E. Hoag, Nuc. Proj. Eng. ,

'

• A. S. Cahlmeyer, Nuc. Plant Engineer r

The inspectors also interviewed other licensee employees during the-

course of their inspection. These included corporate and plant' staff,

engineers, and licensed operators. 7

'

• Present at Exit Interview.

2. Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findinas

(80-09-03 Closed) Problem with the width of the Source Range Monitor- i

t

(SPJ1) anode voltage curve plateau. Westinghouse provided resolution.

(PJ 01-28 Open) Westinghouse-Part 21 report on ECCS Reset / Block Function:

The inspector reviewed changes to Periodic Instrument and Control Test .  :

(PICT) 10-1 and 22-3 for periodic testing of the P-4 relay contacts during

operation; however, action on Westinghouse recommendation to test contacts <

after each cycling of reactor trip breakers remains outstanding.

2 (PJ 08-16 Open) Eisenhut Letter resarding Interim Criteria for Shift

'- Staffing: The inspector reviewed Administrative Order 3-1, Shift complement,

for on-shift staffing and work hour criteria. The inspector commented

that Shift Technical Advisor (STA) coverage was not addressed and Control

Operator (CO) work hours were not specified in paragraph V.A.4. The

licensee agreed to incorporate the above comments in the Administrative Order.

3. IE Bulletin / Circular Folicwuo

The inspection included followup on licensee actions related to recent

IE Bulletins and Circulars. The Bulletins and Circulars had been forwarded

to and reviewed by cognizant members of the licensee's organization.

Inspection findings relating to the Bulletins and Circulars reviewed

during the inspection were as follows:

l

,

P00RON,.-h-

.

.e-0=w"m~*,m-w+-&~++www ,4m n < mom. e m ,,-w.,,,.,,,,,,_y, _,, __ , ____

.

-2-

IE Bulletin 80-06, ESF Reset Controls (0 pen): The licensee's response

to the bulletin ecmmitted to performing a test to verify installed instrumentation

and controls are consistent with the review of the schematic diagrams

end demonstrate all equipment remains in its emergency mode upon removal

or manual resetting of the actuation signal. The inspector reviewed

the licensee's test pMcedure for testing the ESF relays during the

upccming outage. The inspector had no comments on the procedure content.

IE Eulletin 80-12, DHR System Operability (Closed): The inspector verified

the licensee's actions were completed satisfactorily.

IE Bulletin 80-15, Possible Loss of ENS with Loss of Offsite Power (Closed):

The inscector reviewed the licensee's resubmittal and completed actions.

IE Eulietin 80-18, Maintenance of Minimum Flow thru CCP'S Following

Secon w y Side Line Ruoture (0 pen): The inroector reviewed the completed

desian change package for: 1) aligning the CCP miniflow to the VCT

and isolating the return to Ine pump suction; and 2) removing the SI

initiation automatic closure signal from the CCP miniflow isolation valves.

The inspector reviewed operator instructions existed to close the CCP

niniflow isolation valves wnen RCS pressure drops below 1550 psig. and

subsequently reopen the miniflow isolation valves when RCS pressure

rises above 2000 psig. The inspector reviewed the flow verification

tests perfonoed by the licensee on the miniflow recirc lines to ensure

the cesign ficwrate of 60 gpm minimum is met for each pump. The inspector

noted that one pump did not meet the minimum specified. The licensee

had been in contact with klestinghouse who had verbally accepted the

conditica. The inspector requested the licensee resubmit a response to

the bulletin with an analysi:; of the condition. This was agreed to by

the licensee's licensing engineer subsequent to the exit interview.

IE Sulieun 50-21, Vsive Yokes Supplied by Malcolm Foundry Co. (Closed):

The licensee confirmed that no valve yokes manufactured by lialcolm Foundry

were inst;l led at Trojan.

IE Bulletin 80-23, Failures of Solenoid Valves by Valcor Engineering

Company (C% sed): The licensee determincd no Valcor Engineering Solenoid

'! lves were installed at Trojan.

IE Circular 79-22, Stroke Times for Power Cperated Relief Valves (0 pen):

TFe licensee's engineering supervisor committed to add stroke times

to Periodic Instrumentation and Control Test (PICT) 17-1 and 17-2. ,

i

IE Circular 20-21, Regulation of Refueling Crews (Closed): The inspector j

determined the licensee had taken action regarding this item.

IE Circular 80-23, Potential Defects in Beloit Emergency Generators '

(Closed): The licensee does not have this type of equipment at Trojan.

,

l

i

- ,

- . - - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ .

$

-3-

4 Survrillance Testino

The inspector examined the procedures and records pertaining to the

following Periodic Engineering Tests (PET) and Periodic Instrument and '

Control Tests:

PET-11-1 - Fire Protection System - Fire Pain Loop Flow Test

PET-7-4 - Reactor Coolant System Total Flcw Rate Measurement

PET-3 - Core Power Distribution

l

l FET-2 - Incore/Excore Detector Calibration

l

l POT-20-1 - Control Room Ventilation System

PICT-16-1- Hot Control Rod Drop Time Measurements

l

l PICT 9-3 - Alarm and Trip Setpoints of Containment Prassure

PICT-8-1 - Steam Line Pressure - Protection Set III

l

PICT-10-1- Reactor Protection System

Mo items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

1

S. "31ntenance

The inscec w r exa.ninec the liccasee's Maintenance Work Request Procedure

(Adninistrative Order, AC-3-9); Safety Related Equipment Outages Procedure

(Mainistrative Order, AC-3-14); Routine Lubrication Procedure (Administrative

Order, A0-:-10); Mechanical and Electric FrevenLative Faintenance Procedure

(Maintenance Procedure, MP-3-3) and the Vendor Manuals for the Boron

Injection Pump and the Diesel Driven Fire Pump. In addition, the inspector

examired the documentation relating to the following maintenance activities:

1

a. V1Srnien of the Baron Rec 1...latica Pump Motor,

b. Sai ceplaccrent of Baron Recirculation Pump.

c. 5 p r maintenance inscection of the Diesel Driven Fire Pump,

d. Insta:2ation of new suction and discharge valves for the positive

dirplacement reactor coolant system makeup pump and performance

of routine pump inspection and maintenance.

e. Peplacement of diaphram and gasket ire the suction valve to the

Boron Injection Recirculation Pump.

- - . .

_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.

.. . . .

.-

_a_

During e.uMnation of tne above raintenance activities, the inspector

observed tMt the /dministrative Controls permit maintenance to be performed

in accordance with instructions written and approved by the Maintenance

Supervisor without either prior to or subsequent independent review

by any other persons except for those performing the work. However,

in actual nractice, raintenance activities received independent reviews

by both a raintenance engineer and a OA engineer. These reviews serve

as an indeoendent check to preclude unauthorized changes tc the plant

without first receivina the recuired reviews and approvals. The licensee

representative stated that the possibility of unintentional and unauthorized i

changes had been raised during an independent audit of the program and

that the administrative controls would be amended to assure that work

recuests are evaluated for ootential chanaes which reouire additional

safety reviews.

1

?!o items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

6. t sien, cesian Chances, ano Modifications

As part or iiRC's Systematic Assessment of Licensee's Performance (SALP)

Program, the inspector continueu to review the licensee's program for

hanaling Cosign Changes and Modifications. The inspector reviewed two

Design Change Packages with the associated construction packages for

upcoming iMI modifications during tne scneduled spring outage. The

redifications reviewed were THI Action Items II.B.1 - Reactor Vessel

Head Vent System and II.E.'.1 - Auxiliary Feedwater System Upgrade. .

':0 ite:rs of ncaccmpliance or Levi:tions were identified.

7. Exit Interview

'ha inspectors cet .ith licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1)

at the conclusien cf the inspection on January 8,1981. The scope ani

"indings Of the inspection were discussed, as presented in paragraph

2 through 3.

~ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _