ML20126F553
| ML20126F553 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 01/29/1981 |
| From: | Carlson J, Andrea Johnson, Sternberg D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20126F550 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-344-81-01, 50-344-81-1, NUDOCS 8103180913 | |
| Download: ML20126F553 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000344/1981001
Text
.
.
U.
5. !;CCLEAR RECUL\\ TORY CO!'MISSIC t
CETIcF OF I::SPECTICl? Al?D E!:Fo?.CE!'E!TE
RECIo:t v
Report lio. 50-344/81-01
Docket !!o . 50-344
License no. NPF-1
safeguards Group
Licensee:
Portland General Electric Company
121 S. W. Salmon Street
Portland, Oregon 97204
.
Facility !!ame: Trojan
Inspection at: Rainier, Oregon
Inspection conducted: January 5-8, 1981
W Dr
l.,,s.
n
'O
j/
/ hCrh
Ac7
Inspectors: _
N/ <,
J. D. Carlson, , Reactor Inspector
' bate Signed
'
,
1l7, lg
/'b
, sn.s.,
-
i
A. D. Jchnson,' Reactor Inspector
/ '/Date Signed
~
Date Signed
,,
~
g/l %
[CxC}4,vv
O
s.
/
,V
j
j
,
4,-
A9/P/
Approved 3y:
'
D. :: Sternberg, Chief, Reactpf' Project :,ection 1
Date signed
'
.
Reactcr Operations and iluclear Support dranch
Instnction on January ~-C, 1981 (Recort No. 50-344/81-01)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of maintenance; surveillance;
cesign, design changes, and modifications; response to IE Bulletins and Circulars
and followup on previous inspection items; also included independent inspection
effo rt.
The inspection involved 40 inspector hours onsite by two !!RC inspectors.
Results: No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.
.
.
a.
'
RV F rm 219 (2)
0%3
.
.
. . - - . - -
- -
-
-
,
.-
.
DETAILS
--
1.
' Persons Contacted-
C.- P. Yundt, General Manager
'
- C. A. Olmstead, Manager, Technical Services -
- R. P. Barkhurst, Manager, Operations and Maintenance
- J. D. Reid, Manager, Plant Services
R. P. Schmitt, Engineering Supervisor
- M. R. Snook, OA Supervisor (Acting)
,
- R. Susee, Training Supervisor
- D. L. Bennett, Control & Electrical Supervisor -
"
t
- R. L. Steele, Manager, Nuclear Project Eng.
'
.
- S. E. Hoag, Nuc. Proj. Eng.
'
,
- A. S. Cahlmeyer, Nuc. Plant Engineer
r
The inspectors also interviewed other licensee employees during the-
course of their inspection. These included corporate and plant' staff,
engineers, and licensed operators.
7
'
- Present at Exit Interview.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findinas
(80-09-03 Closed) Problem with the width of the Source Range Monitor-
t
i
(SPJ1) anode voltage curve plateau. Westinghouse provided resolution.
(PJ 01-28 Open) Westinghouse-Part 21 report on ECCS Reset / Block Function:
The inspector reviewed changes to Periodic Instrument and Control Test .
(PICT) 10-1 and 22-3 for periodic testing of the P-4 relay contacts during
operation; however, action on Westinghouse recommendation to test contacts
<
after each cycling of reactor trip breakers remains outstanding.
(PJ 08-16 Open) Eisenhut Letter resarding Interim Criteria for Shift
2
Staffing: The inspector reviewed Administrative Order 3-1, Shift complement,
'-
for on-shift staffing and work hour criteria.
The inspector commented
that Shift Technical Advisor (STA) coverage was not addressed and Control
Operator (CO) work hours were not specified in paragraph V.A.4.
The
licensee agreed to incorporate the above comments in the Administrative Order.
3.
IE Bulletin / Circular Folicwuo
The inspection included followup on licensee actions related to recent
IE Bulletins and Circulars.
The Bulletins and Circulars had been forwarded
to and reviewed by cognizant members of the licensee's organization.
Inspection findings relating to the Bulletins and Circulars reviewed
during the inspection were as follows:
,
P00RON,.-h-
.
.e-0=w"m~*,m-w+-&~++www ,4m n < mom. e m
,,-w.,,,.,,,,,,_y,
_,, __ , ____
.
-2-
IE Bulletin 80-06, ESF Reset Controls (0 pen): The licensee's response
to the bulletin ecmmitted to performing a test to verify installed instrumentation
and controls are consistent with the review of the schematic diagrams
end demonstrate all equipment remains in its emergency mode upon removal
or manual resetting of the actuation signal.
The inspector reviewed
the licensee's test pMcedure for testing the ESF relays during the
upccming outage. The inspector had no comments on the procedure content.
IE Eulletin 80-12, DHR System Operability (Closed): The inspector verified
the licensee's actions were completed satisfactorily.
IE Bulletin 80-15, Possible Loss of ENS with Loss of Offsite Power (Closed):
The inscector reviewed the licensee's resubmittal and completed actions.
IE Eulietin 80-18, Maintenance of Minimum Flow thru CCP'S Following
Secon w y Side Line Ruoture (0 pen): The inroector reviewed the completed
desian change package for: 1) aligning the CCP miniflow to the VCT
and isolating the return to Ine pump suction; and 2) removing the SI
initiation automatic closure signal from the CCP miniflow isolation valves.
The inspector reviewed operator instructions existed to close the CCP
niniflow isolation valves wnen RCS pressure drops below 1550 psig. and
subsequently reopen the miniflow isolation valves when RCS pressure
rises above 2000 psig.
The inspector reviewed the flow verification
tests perfonoed by the licensee on the miniflow recirc lines to ensure
the cesign ficwrate of 60 gpm minimum is met for each pump. The inspector
noted that one pump did not meet the minimum specified. The licensee
had been in contact with klestinghouse who had verbally accepted the
conditica. The inspector requested the licensee resubmit a response to
the bulletin with an analysi:; of the condition. This was agreed to by
the licensee's licensing engineer subsequent to the exit interview.
IE Sulieun 50-21, Vsive Yokes Supplied by Malcolm Foundry Co. (Closed):
The licensee confirmed that no valve yokes manufactured by lialcolm Foundry
were inst;l led at Trojan.
IE Bulletin 80-23, Failures of Solenoid Valves by Valcor Engineering
Company (C% sed): The licensee determincd no Valcor Engineering Solenoid
'! lves were installed at Trojan.
IE Circular 79-22, Stroke Times for Power Cperated Relief Valves (0 pen):
TFe licensee's engineering supervisor committed to add stroke times
to Periodic Instrumentation and Control Test (PICT) 17-1 and 17-2.
,
i
IE Circular 20-21, Regulation of Refueling Crews (Closed): The inspector
j
determined the licensee had taken action regarding this item.
IE Circular 80-23, Potential Defects in Beloit Emergency Generators
'
(Closed): The licensee does not have this type of equipment at Trojan.
,
l
i
- ,
-
.
- - _ _
_ - - _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ .
$
-3-
4
Survrillance Testino
The inspector examined the procedures and records pertaining to the
following Periodic Engineering Tests (PET) and Periodic Instrument and
'
Control Tests:
PET-11-1 - Fire Protection System - Fire Pain Loop Flow Test
PET-7-4 - Reactor Coolant System Total Flcw Rate Measurement
PET-3
- Core Power Distribution
l
l
FET-2
- Incore/Excore Detector Calibration
l
l
POT-20-1 - Control Room Ventilation System
PICT-16-1- Hot Control Rod Drop Time Measurements
l
l
PICT 9-3 - Alarm and Trip Setpoints of Containment Prassure
PICT-8-1 - Steam Line Pressure - Protection Set III
l
PICT-10-1- Reactor Protection System
Mo items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
1
S.
"31ntenance
The inscec w r exa.ninec the liccasee's Maintenance Work Request Procedure
(Adninistrative Order, AC-3-9); Safety Related Equipment Outages Procedure
(Mainistrative Order, AC-3-14); Routine Lubrication Procedure (Administrative
Order, A0-:-10); Mechanical and Electric FrevenLative Faintenance Procedure
(Maintenance Procedure, MP-3-3) and the Vendor Manuals for the Boron
Injection Pump and the Diesel Driven Fire Pump.
In addition, the inspector
examired the documentation relating to the following maintenance activities:
1
a.
V1Srnien of the Baron Rec 1...latica Pump Motor,
b.
Sai ceplaccrent of Baron Recirculation Pump.
c.
5 p r maintenance inscection of the Diesel Driven Fire Pump,
d.
Insta:2ation of new suction and discharge valves for the positive
dirplacement reactor coolant system makeup pump and performance
of routine pump inspection and maintenance.
e.
Peplacement of diaphram and gasket ire the suction valve to the
Boron Injection Recirculation Pump.
- - .
.
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
..
.
.
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.-
_a_
During e.uMnation of tne above raintenance activities, the inspector
observed tMt the /dministrative Controls permit maintenance to be performed
in accordance with instructions written and approved by the Maintenance
Supervisor without either prior to or subsequent independent review
by any other persons except for those performing the work.
However,
in actual nractice, raintenance activities received independent reviews
by both a raintenance engineer and a OA engineer. These reviews serve
as an indeoendent check to preclude unauthorized changes tc the plant
without first receivina the recuired reviews and approvals. The licensee
representative stated that the possibility of unintentional and unauthorized
i
changes had been raised during an independent audit of the program and
that the administrative controls would be amended to assure that work
recuests are evaluated for ootential chanaes which reouire additional
safety reviews.
1
?!o items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
t sien, cesian Chances, ano Modifications
As part or iiRC's Systematic Assessment of Licensee's Performance (SALP)
Program, the inspector continueu to review the licensee's program for
hanaling Cosign Changes and Modifications. The inspector reviewed two
Design Change Packages with the associated construction packages for
upcoming iMI modifications during tne scneduled spring outage.
The
redifications reviewed were THI Action Items II.B.1 - Reactor Vessel
Head Vent System and II.E.'.1 - Auxiliary Feedwater System Upgrade.
.
':0 ite:rs of ncaccmpliance or Levi:tions were identified.
7.
Exit Interview
'ha inspectors cet .ith licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1)
at the conclusien cf the inspection on January 8,1981.
The scope ani
"indings Of the inspection were discussed, as presented in paragraph
2 through 3.
~
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _