ML20126D866

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 921005-09 & 19-23. Violation Noted:Deficiencies Noted in Rev 2 to Bechtel Procedure WPD-002 Re Phase II Walkdowns for Reactor Bldg & Drywell Platform Steel Not Promptly Corrected
ML20126D866
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/20/1992
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20126D865 List:
References
50-324-92-33, 50-325-92-33, NUDOCS 9212280194
Download: ML20126D866 (1)


Text

_ . _ _ _ .. . . ..

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Docket Nos.: 50-325 and 50-324 i Brunswick License Nos.: DPR-71 and DPR-62

, During an NRC inspection conducted on October 5-9 and 19-23, 1992, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2,

Appendix C, the violation is listed below

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI requires that conditions adverse to quality such as failures, deficiencies and deviations be promptly identified and corrected.

Contrary to the above, the deficiencies identified in Revision 2 of Bechtel Procedure WDP-002, Phase II Walkdowns Procedure for Reactor i Building miscellaneous steel and drywell platform steel, by NRC on September 17, were not promptly corrected. The Phase II walkdown inspections were continuing using Revision 2 of procedure WDP-002 as of October 23, 1992. This procedure had not been corrected (revised) and re-issued to correct the deficiencies regarding visual inspection of welds identified by NRC during the inspection conducted September 14-18, 1992, documented in NRC Inspection Report numbers 50-325/92-27 and 50-

. 324-92-27, i

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Carolina Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.

20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within.30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2)- the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 20th day of November 1992 9212280194 DR 921120 ADOCK 05000324 PDR

-