text
m, Mai nc om.. mye rerry u, weaora, er Northeast Utilities System
,,.o. n>> 128 Waterford, Cr 06385-0128 (201) 447-1791 June 14,1996 Docket No. 50-423 B15752 Re: 10CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) and 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A)
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 a.
This letter forwards Licensee Event Report 96-012-00, documenting an event that occurred at Millstone Unit No. 3 on May 15,1996. This LER is submitted pursuant to 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) and 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A).
Very truly yours, NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY i
b N
M. H. Brothers
\\
ggOlb Unit Director, Millstone Unit No. 3)
Attachment: LER 96-012-00 cc:
T. T. Martin, Region l Administrator A. C. Cerne, Senior Resident inspector, Millstone Unit No. 3
- - V. L. Rooney, NRC Project Manager, Millstone Unit No. 3 9606180275 960614 1h PDR ADOCK 05000423 j
V S
PDR os3422 9 nov. : 9s
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY Commission APPROVED BY OMB NO. 31504104 EXPlRES 04130/98 go.gg Nr oNthi sffS Es (Nito N n^rio^"MTf?"^!L'a T=Ps".1%5a ^?uda
'R Ten"'/oT.^3MK2s".^o"J.T.T.,N" &
- 5!%^Ylitac1WKIMT1". 0?sfRM"&"na""'-
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) in?A (See reverse for required number of dig:ts/ characters for each block)
F ACluTY N AME lil DOCKET NWSER (2)
PAGE (3)
Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 05000423 1 of 8 fifLI I4)
Containment Leakage in Excess of Technical Specification Limits Due to Valve Leakage EVENT DATE (5)
LER NUMBER (6)
REPORT DATE (7)
OTHER FACfLITIES INVOLVED (8)
MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL REvlsioN MONTH DAY YEAR FACIUTY NAME DOCKET NUMBER NUMBER
'^ " "*"'
05 15 96 96 012 00 06 14 96 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 1o CFR 5: (Check one or rnore) (til MODE (9) 5 2o.22o1(b) 20.2203(a)(2)(v>
X so.73(a)(2)(i)
So.73( )(2)(viii)
POWER 20.2203(a)(1) 2o.2203(a)(3)(i)
X so.73(a)(2)(ii)
So.73(a)(2)(x)
LEVEL (lo) 000 20.22o3(a)(2)(i) 20.2203(a)(3)(ii)
So.73(a)(2)(iii) 73.71 2o.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a)(4)
So.73(a)(2)(iv)
OTHER 20.22o3(a)(2)(iii)
So.36(c)(1)
So.73(a)(2)(v)
Spgi y in Ab t elow y
20.2203(a)(2)(iv)
So.36(c)(2)
So.73(a)(2)(vii)
W LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THis LER (12)
NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER Onclude A,ea Codel William J. Temple, Nuclear Licensing Supervisor (860)437-5904 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLT TO NPRDS TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)
EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR i
BMISSION YES NO 08 30 96 g
(If yes. complete EXPECTED Submission DATE).
ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)
On May 15,1996, while performing containment penetrat.5n Local Leak Rate Tests (LLRTs) with the plant in cold i
shutdown, the leak rate for containment isolation valves exceeded the Technical Specification limit. The leakage through a High Pressure Safety injection (SlH) valve, when combined with previously determined leakage for other penetrations, exceeded the Technical Specification limit of 0.6L. (294,800.2 secm).
Subsequent to May 15,1996, the LLRTs performed on other isolation valves revealed additional leakage that further contributed to exceeding the Technical Specification limit. The valves that were major contributors to the total leak rate were those located on a containment Recirculation Spray (RSS) line, a Hydrogen Recombiner (HCS) line, a containment Quench Spra) (OSS) line, the Containment Purge (HVU) supply line, and a Low Pressure Safety Injection (SIL) line.
On May 29,1996, during the performance of LLRTs, an additional"as found" leakage resulted in the total exceeding an analyzed condition. The leakage through valves on the HVU line was unquantifiable due to excessive leakage. Thus, an immediate notification was made on May 29,1996, pursuant to 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(i) for an event found while shutdown, that if found while operadng, would have resulted in an unanalyzed condition that significantly compromises plant safety.
The cause is attributed to boric acid buildup during the test sequence on the QSS and RSS valves. Foreign particulate is the attributed cause on the SlH valve, and seal overtightening is the cause on the HVU valve. The corrective action was flushing for the boron and particulates, and readjusting for the HVU seal. To prevent recurrence the testing and flushing procedures will be revised. A supplement LER will provide corrective action on the HCS and SIL valves.
i NRC FORM 366 (4 95)
- U.S. NUCLEAR REoVLATORY COMMISSION (4 95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAoE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REvlsloN Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 05000423 NUMBER NUMBER 2 of 8 00 012 96 TEXT Uf more space is required, use additional copies of NRC form 366A) (il) 1.
Descriotion of Event On May 15,1996, while performing containment penetration Local Leak Rate Tests (LLRTs) with the plant in cold shutdown, the leak rate for containment isolation valves exceeded the Technical Specification limit. The leak rates i
through a high pressure safety injection isolation valve and a low pressure safety injection isolation valve, when combined with previously determined leakage for other penetrations, exceeded the Technical Specification 3.6.1.2.b Type C limit of 0.6L. (294,800.2 secm).
i a
The subsequent LLRTs performed on other containment isolation valves revealed additional *as-found* leak rates that further contributed to exceeding the Technical Specification limit. The isolation valves that were major contributors to the total leak rate were those associated with: a containment quench spray line, a high pressure safety injection line, a containment Recirculation spray line, a hydrogen Recombiner line, the containment purge supply line, and a low j
pressure safety injection line. Each of the major contributors to the totalleak rate is described below.
o On May 10,1996, the LLRT leakage through the inboard isolation check valve (3QSS*V4) on the Containment Quench Spray line (12-inch) penetration #100 was 156,000 secm. This leakage, added to the *as-found* total for all other valves as of May 10,1996, hvi not exceeded the Technical Specification limit, and by itself is not reportable.
However, it is included in this LER because it was a major contributor to the total eventually exceeding the Technical Specification limit five days later. See Figure 1. The outboard isolation valve would have maintained containment integrity.
j o On May 15,1996, the combined LLRT leakage through both: the inboard isolation check valve (3SIL*V13) on the Low Pressure Safety injection line (6-inch) penetration #94; and through the inboard isolation check valve 1
(3SlH*V24) on the High Pressure Safety injection 1:ae (2-inch) penetration #98, was 43,900 secm. This event, added to the total for all previous LLRTs exceeded the Technical Specification limit. See Figure 2. The outboard l
isolation valve would have maintained containment integrity.
o Later on May 15,1996, the LLRT leakage through the inboard isolation check valve (3RSS*V3) on the Containment Recirculation Spray line (10-inch) penetration #107 was 111,100 sccm. See Figure 3. The outboard isolation valve i
would have maintained containment integrity.
o On May 24,1996, the LLRT leakage through the inboard isolation check valve (3HCS*V14) on the Hydrogen Recombiner line (2-inch) penetration #114 was 51,900 secm. See Figure 4. The outboard isolation valve would
]
have maintained containment integrity, o On May 29,1996, the LLRT leakage through isolation valves on the Containment Purge supply line was unquantifiable due to excessive leakage. The Containment Purge supply line (42-inch) penetration #86 has three isolation valves, one inboard (3HVU*CTV33A), one outboard (3HVU*CTV32A), and an additional outboard valve on
)
a 30-inch branch line (3HVU*VS). The inboard valve and both outboard valves are tested simultaneously because they cannot be tested independently. See Figure 5. The combined leakage through these three valves was unquantifiable due to excessive leakage that prevented the test pressure from being reached. This leakage alone exceeded the Technical Specification 3.6.1.2.c secondary containment bypass leakage limit of 0.042L. (20,833.9 sccm), and it exceeded the Technical Specification 3.6.1.2.b Type C limit of 0.6L. (294,800.2 sccm). It also resulted in the totalleakage exceeding an analyzed condition that had been previously determined. Accordingly, an immediate notification was made on May 29,1996, pursuant to 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(i) for an event found while shutdown, that if found while operating, would have resulted in an unanalyzed condition that significantly compromises plant safety. No immediate action was required because the plant was in a shutdown condition.
.~
' NRC FORM 3e:A U.S. NUCLEAR REoVLATORY COMMISSloN
{490 UCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REvlsioN Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 05000423 NUMBER NUMBER 3 of 8 00 012 96 TEXT (If rnore space is required. use additional copies of NRC form 366A) (17) e i
o On June 6,1996, the LLRT leakage through the inboard isolation check valve (3SIL*V6) on the Low Pressure Safety Injection line (6-inch) penetration #93 was unquantifiable due to excessive leakage that prevented the test pressure from being reached. See Figure 6. The outboard isolation valve would have maintained containment integrity.
The attached Table i provides a summary of the leakage rates for these valves which had excess leakage, and it provides a comparison to the Technical Specification limits.
j
- 11..Cause of Eve.rli i
The cause of the excessive leakage through the inboard isolation check valve 3QSS*V4 on the Containment Quench j
Spray line penetration #100 is attributed to boric acid residue which prevented the disc from fully closing. From the time the line is drained to perform the test, until the leak test is actually completed is approximately two days. It is believed that residual borated water in the bowl of the valve, which is the low point ir the system, evaporated prior to performing the test. This cause was verified by having the line flushed with demineralized water and retested. The as-left results were acceptable and did not Indicate any intemal damage when compared to previous leak results. The internal were examined during the mid 1995 refueling outage, with no disc or seat wear identified.
The cause of the excessive combined LLRT leakage through both: the inboard isolation check valve 3SIL*V13 on the Low Pressure Safety injection line penetration #94; and through the inboard isolation check valve 3SlH*V24 on the High Pressure Safety injection line penetration #98, was attributed to valve 3SlH*V24 either improperly seated or j
foreign material was present in the valve. A flush of the line was performed and the penetration was retested. The as-left results were acceptable. A review of previous leak results for this penetration indicate that the check valve shows a decreasing leakage trend over the last three outages.
I The cause of the excessive leakage through the inboard Isolation check valve 3RSS*V3 on the Containment i
Recirculation Spray line penetration #107 is attributed to boric acid residue which prevented the disc from fully closing.
From the time the line is drained to perform the test, until the leak test is actually completed is approximately two days.
It is believed that residual borated water in the bowl of the valve, which is the low point in the system evaporated prior i
to performing the test. This cause was verified by having the line flushed with demineralized water and retested. The as-left results were acceptable and did not indicate any internal damage when compared to previous leak results.
Further evidence of the cause was obtained by a visualinspection of the B train valve 3RSS*V6, performed this shutdcwn. Boron was present in the bowl of this valve.
The cause of the excessive leakage through the inboard isolation check valve 3HCS*V14 on the Hydrogen Recombiner line penetration #114 was foreign material present in the pipe and disk seating area. The materialis being evaluated and is believed to be hydrocarbon byproduct caused by the higher temperatures produced during the hydrogen Recombiner process.
The cause of the excessive combined leakage through the isolation valves 3HVU*CTV33A,3HVU*CTV32A, and 3HVU*VS on the Containment Purge supply line penetration #86 was a bulge in the outer valve 3HVU*CTV32A seat ring. The bulge is attributed to overtightening during installation performed in the mid 1995 refueling outage.
The cause of the excessive leakage through the inboard Isolation check valve 3SIL*V6 on the Low Pressure Safety injection line penetration #93 is under Investigation and will be reported in a supplement to this LER.
i
- - Ill. Analvsis of Event The LLRT leakage through the inboard isolation check valve 3OSS*V4 on the Containment Quench Spray line penetration #100 was 156,000 secm. This leakage, added to the *as-found" total for all other valves as of May 10, NHC FORM 366A 44-90
.U.S. NUCLEAR REoVLAloRY Commission 84 95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILrTY NAME {1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PACE 13)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REvlsioN NUMBER NUMBER 4 of 8 Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 05000423 96 012 00 TEXT Uf more space is required, use additional copies of NRC form 366A) til) 1996, had not exceeded the Technical Specification limit, and by itself is not reportable. However, it is included in this LER because it was a major contributor to the total eventually exceeding the Technical Specification limit five days later. The leakage through the outboard valve 30SS*MV34A was 107.3 sccm, which would have maintained containment integrity.
The combined LLRT leakage through both: the inboard isolation check valve (3SIL*V13) on the Low Pressure Safety injection line penetration #94; and through the inboard isolation check valve (3SlH'V24) on the High Pressure Safety Injection line penetration #98, was 43,900 secm. This event, added to the total for all previous LLRTs exceeded the Technical Specification limit. The leakage through the outboard isolation valves 3SIL*MV88098 and 3SlH*MV8835 was 132 and 20 scem respectively, which would have maintained containment integrity.
The subsequent LLRTs performed on other containment isolation valves revealed additional"as-found" leak rates that contributed to exceeding the Technical Specification limit. The additional isolation valves that were major contributors to the totalleak rate were those associated with: a containment Recirculation spray line, a hydrogen Recombiner line, the containment purge supply line, and a low pressure safety injection line. These additional contributors to the total leak rate are described below.
The LLRT leakage through the inboard isolation check valve (3RSS*V3) on the Containment Recirculation Spray line penetration #107 was 111,100 sccm. The outboard valve 3RSS*MOV20D leakage was 1850 sccm, which would have maintained containment integrity.
The LLRT leakage through the inboard isolation check valve (3HCS*V14) on the Hydrogen Recombiner line penetration #114 was 51,900 sccm. The outboard valve 3HCS*V13 leakage was 20 sccm, which would have maintained containment integrity.
The LLRT leakage through isolation valves on the Containment Purge supply line was unquantifiable due to excessive leakage. The Containment Purge supply line penetration #86 has three isolation valves, one inboard (3HVU*CTV33A),
one outboard (3HVU*CTV32A), and an additional outboard valve on a 30-inch branch line (3HVU*VS). The inboard and both outboard valves are tested simultaneously because they cannot be tested independently. See Figure 5. The combined leakage through these three valves was unquantifiable due to excessive leakage that prevented the test pressure from being reached. This leakage alone exceeded the Technical Specification 3.6.1.2.c secondary containment bypass leakage limit of 0.042L. (20,633.9 secm), and it exceeded the Technical Specification 3.6.1.2.b Type C limit of 0.6L. (294,800.2 sccm). It also resulted in the total leakage exceeding an analyzed condition.
Accordingly, an immediate notification was made on May 29,1996, pursuant to 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(i) for an event found while shutdown, that if found while operating, would have resulted in an unanalyzed condition that significantly compromises plant safety. No immediate action was required because the plant was in a shutdown condition.
The LLRT leakage through the inboard isolation check valve (3SIL*V6) on the Low Pressure Safety injection line penetration #93 was unquantifiable due to excessive leakage that prevented the test pressure from being reached.
The outboard valve 3SIL*MV8809A leakage was 403 sccm, which would have maintained containment integrity.
IV. Corrective Action
The corrective action for the inboard isolation check valve 30SS*V4 on the Containment Quench Spray line penetration #100 was to perform a flush of the line to remove any boron deposits. Inspection results from the mid-1995 refueling outage did not indicate any adverse conditions including seat or disc damage. The as ! eft results from the mid 1995 refueling outage were comparable to the as-left results from this outage. Therefore it is concluded that no rew damage to the seating surface is present. However, the historical review of this valve as compared to the B train valve: 3OSS*V8 shows that 30SS*V4 has consistently higher leakage. This valve will be reworked during the MC FORM 366A (4-95)
.U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSloN 14 95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FActLITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REvlsioN Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 05000423 NUMBER NUMBER 5 of 8 96 012 00 TEXT Vimore space is required. use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17) next refueling outage, to further improve the seating surfaces. A clean water flush of the QSS system will be evaluated to determine if the flush should be performed on a routine basis for each penetration after each as-found LLRT test. In addition, the number of times the system is drained and refilled is being reduced. Currently the line is drained each quarter to ahow cycling of the outboard isolation valves: 3OSS*MV34A/B. In this condition it is possible for boron to enter into the containment side of the penetration, due to the lower pressure condition inside containment (maintained at a slight vacuum), The draining frequency will be reduced to each cold shutdown, which will reduce the potential for boron to be present in the system.
The corrective action for the inboard isolation check valve 3SlH*V24 on the High Pressure Safety injection line penetration #98, was flushing the line with water. A review of previous leak results indicates an improving trend of overall decreasing leakage. Therefore, it is determined that the valve internals are not adversely affected. Valve 3SlH*V24 will be disassembled for inspection during the next refueling outage if as-found leak rates increase above the current outage as-left results. deviating from the current trend.
The corrective action for the inboard isolation check valve 3RSS*V3 on the Containment Recirculation Spray line penetration #107 was flushing the line with water. The histor/ of this valve does not indicate any decreasing valve leakage. An inspection of the other train valve 3RSS*V6 indicated boron in the valve body. Based on the limited data available, a flush of each penetration is being evaluated. It is believed that performing a closed cooling water flush after each as-found leak test will reduce the level of boron present in the valve.
The corrective action for the inboard isolation check valve 3HCS*V14 on the Hydrogen Recombiner line penetration
- 114 is being evaluated and will be reported in a supplement to this LER.
The corrective action for the isolation valves 3HVU*CTV32A,3HVU*CTV33A, and 3HVU*V5 on the Containment Purge supply line penetration #86 was to repair the seating surfaces of the 32A/33A valves. The t ring seat of outboard valve 3HVU*CTV32A was fully adjusted after it was identified that a bulge existed in one segment of the t-ring. There are 14 segments each containing three set screws. The maintenance procedure was compared to the vendor recommendations to ensure full compliance with the adjustment process. Due to the design of this penetration it is difficult to identify if both valves or only one valve caused the excessive leakage. Minor adjustments were performed on the inboard valve t-ring seat. A retest produced very low leak rates.
The corrective action for the inboard isolation check valve 3SIL*V6 on the Low Pressure Safety injection line penetration #93 is being evaluated and will be reported in a supplement to this LER.
V.
Additional Information
Similar Events LER 91-004-01 and LER 95-009-02 discuss similar events of containment leakage in excess of Technical Specification limits due to containment isolation valve leakage.
Manufacturer Data Ells Equipment Code: Isolation Valves - ISV NP.C FORM 366A (4 94
- - _____ _ _ _U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I4 95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISloN NUMBER NUMBER 6 Of 8 Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 05000423 012 00 96 TEXT (11 more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) til)
TABLE 1 Containment Type C Leakane Data (in secm)
Penetration Valve As-Left As-Found As-Left (Number)
(ID)
(Refuel 5)
{Mid-Cvele 6)
(Mid-Cvele 6)
Quench Spray 30SS*V4 3,740 156,000 8,090 (100)
Safety injection (94) 3SIL*V13 1,176 43,900 1,480 (98) 3SlH*V24 Recirculation Spray 3RSS*V3 1,533 111,100 1,283 (107)
Hydrogen Recombiner 3HCS*V14 1,800 51,900
[?](')
(114)
Low Pressure injection 3SIL*V6 544 Indeterminate
[?](*)
(93)
Other Penetrations Sub-Total 56,278.1 136,059.1 112,143.9 All Penetrations Total 56.976.3 498.959.1 122.996.9 Technical Specification Allowable Limit (0.6LJ 294.800.2 294.800.2 294.800.2 Containment Bypass Leakane Data (in secm)
Penetration Valve As-Left As-Found As-Left (Number)
(ID)
(Refuel 5)
(Mid-Cycle 6)
(Mid-Cycle 6)
Purge Supply 3HVU*CTV33A 664 Indeterminate 20 (86) 3HVU*CTV32A 3HVU'V5 Other Penetrations Sub-Total 3,246 4,253 4,253 All Penetrations Total 3.910.6 4.253 4.273 Technical Specification Allowable Limit (0.042LJ 20.633.9 20.633.9 20.633.9
- Note: The As-Left leak rate will be provided in an LER supplement.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __-_-- - _____ -__________ _ _ _ _ _ _
..U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION H 961 UCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEX T CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENT (AL REVIStoN Millstone Nuclear Power Stat,on Unit 3 05000423 NuMern Nvuern 7 of 8 i
012 00 96 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC form 3GGA) (17)
Figura 1, Containment Quench Spray Penetration #100 n
vE" T"
.h % *E'E c
5 a.)
R*w
~
'vI f~
Figure 2, Low Pressure / High Pressure Safety injection Penetration #98 04 LkiC/0 to M
kV0M vaF6 vett
' M-M-wcn
{
wen
(
cx e
V\\\\
u.,a
~ k "r,He.
/j u*'**
vm
's Avsm t-H vva.ie e,,,,,
ve l-- y y
~~
- 2, -cg
,,4 m...,
LWJD Figure 3, Containment Recirculation Spray Penetration #107 I
--- a vnr 10 7 l
LtdC/V
)
LWC/V
\\
H3
$[,
D'81 t/
NRC FOAM 366A (4-95i
WRC, FORM 3G6A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 84 9W LICENSEE EVF.NT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (0)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTI AL REVISION Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 05000423 NUMBER NUMBE R 8 Of 8 96 012 00 TEXT IIIrnore space is required. Lse additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)
Figure 4, Hydrogen Recombiner Penetration #114 14 P
,a tuv. rs -y W
lj Lhc l
n e
50 Figure 5, Containment Purge Supply Penetration #86
.g.
EJA 88 CTV)2A-g g,3p m,....r H H
h LJ at n
y LWC Figure 6, Low Pressure Safety injection Penetration #93 u
ste v6 y
- k_8, UI n..,
r n.,,
w
\\
nu
- - 3 =a
)l vm un Cv,6am Wy,
i L
a o'.,o SL e.9 a
28 u wa.... _ _
}}
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000336/LER-1996-001, :on 960625,discovered Reactor Coolant Sys Heatup Rate Exceeded Tech Spec.Caused by Design & Procedural Weaknesses Re Plant Heatup Controls.Revised Plant Operating Procedures & Heatup/Cooldown Computer Program |
- on 960625,discovered Reactor Coolant Sys Heatup Rate Exceeded Tech Spec.Caused by Design & Procedural Weaknesses Re Plant Heatup Controls.Revised Plant Operating Procedures & Heatup/Cooldown Computer Program
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1996-001-02, :on 960120,supplementary Leak Collection & Release Sys Declared Inoperable Due to Equipment Failure of Door Latch.Door Repaired & Plant Returned to 100% Power |
- on 960120,supplementary Leak Collection & Release Sys Declared Inoperable Due to Equipment Failure of Door Latch.Door Repaired & Plant Returned to 100% Power
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1996-002, :on 960108,determined That Ice Plug in Common Line Resulted in Inability to Backwash Svc Water Strainers. Caused by Mod to Backwash Line Piping.Ice Plug Removed, Restoring Ability to Backwash |
- on 960108,determined That Ice Plug in Common Line Resulted in Inability to Backwash Svc Water Strainers. Caused by Mod to Backwash Line Piping.Ice Plug Removed, Restoring Ability to Backwash
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat | | 05000423/LER-1996-002-02, :on 960310,inadequate Surveillance for Determining Shutdown Margin When Unisolating Rcl Identified. Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Procedures Revised |
- on 960310,inadequate Surveillance for Determining Shutdown Margin When Unisolating Rcl Identified. Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) | | 05000423/LER-1996-002, :on 960310,inadequate Surveillance for Determining Shutdown Margin When Unisolating Rcl Occurred Due to Procedure Inadequacy.Changes Will Be Made to Technical Requirements Manual |
- on 960310,inadequate Surveillance for Determining Shutdown Margin When Unisolating Rcl Occurred Due to Procedure Inadequacy.Changes Will Be Made to Technical Requirements Manual
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000245/LER-1996-003, :on 960111,discovered Existing Anchorage of EDG Day Tank Not Seismically Adequate.Caused by Original Design Deficiency.Anchorage of EDG Tank Will Be Graded to Meet Design Basis of Seismic Load Requirements |
- on 960111,discovered Existing Anchorage of EDG Day Tank Not Seismically Adequate.Caused by Original Design Deficiency.Anchorage of EDG Tank Will Be Graded to Meet Design Basis of Seismic Load Requirements
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(e)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(e)(2)(viii) | | 05000336/LER-1996-003-01, :on 960205,failed to Recognize Requirement to Enter TS LCO 3.0.3 Following Discovery of Ice Blockage. Caused by Inadequate Problem Identification Methods.Design Basis Summary Documents Have Been Prepared Re TS Safety Sys |
- on 960205,failed to Recognize Requirement to Enter TS LCO 3.0.3 Following Discovery of Ice Blockage. Caused by Inadequate Problem Identification Methods.Design Basis Summary Documents Have Been Prepared Re TS Safety Sys
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000245/LER-1996-003-02, Forwards LER 96-003-02 Which Documents an Event That Occurred at Mnps,Unit 1 on 960111,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i) & 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii).Commitments Made in Ltr,Submitted | Forwards LER 96-003-02 Which Documents an Event That Occurred at Mnps,Unit 1 on 960111,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i) & 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii).Commitments Made in Ltr,Submitted | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1996-003-01, :on 960312,temporary I-Beams Located Overhead of Recirculation Spray Sys HXs Discovered.Caused by Inadequate Work Control.Work Control Procedures Revised |
- on 960312,temporary I-Beams Located Overhead of Recirculation Spray Sys HXs Discovered.Caused by Inadequate Work Control.Work Control Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000423/LER-1996-004-01, :on 960319,determined That Auxiliary Feedwater Isolation Valves Were in Noncompliance W/Ts.Caused by Misinterpretation of Ts.Revised Operating Procedure to Preclude cross-connected Sys Alignment |
- on 960319,determined That Auxiliary Feedwater Isolation Valves Were in Noncompliance W/Ts.Caused by Misinterpretation of Ts.Revised Operating Procedure to Preclude cross-connected Sys Alignment
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1996-004, :on 960131,svc Water Strainer Backwash Sys Susceptibility to Freezing Following Loss of Intake Structure non-vital Heating Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Original Design.Design Change Implemented |
- on 960131,svc Water Strainer Backwash Sys Susceptibility to Freezing Following Loss of Intake Structure non-vital Heating Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Original Design.Design Change Implemented
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1996-004-02, :on 960316,auxiliary Feedwater Isolation Valves Noncompliance W/Ts Occurred.Caused by Misinterpretation of Ts.Event Reviewed W/Station Personnel to Caution Others on TS Surveillance Requirements |
- on 960316,auxiliary Feedwater Isolation Valves Noncompliance W/Ts Occurred.Caused by Misinterpretation of Ts.Event Reviewed W/Station Personnel to Caution Others on TS Surveillance Requirements
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000336/LER-1996-005-01, :on 960212,discovered PEO Improperly Utilized to Replace Automatic Backwash Function of Svc Water Strainer Backwash Sys.Caused by Failure to Enter TS Action Statement. Revise Procedures for IST SWS Pump Operability |
- on 960212,discovered PEO Improperly Utilized to Replace Automatic Backwash Function of Svc Water Strainer Backwash Sys.Caused by Failure to Enter TS Action Statement. Revise Procedures for IST SWS Pump Operability
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1996-005-02, :on 960321,service Water Booster Pump Auto Start Discovered Disable.Caused by Inadequate Review.C/A: Bypass Jumper Removed & Mod Initiated |
- on 960321,service Water Booster Pump Auto Start Discovered Disable.Caused by Inadequate Review.C/A: Bypass Jumper Removed & Mod Initiated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) 10 CFR 50.73(s)(2) | | 05000423/LER-1996-005-03, :on 960321,design Noncompliance Noted for High Temp Automatic Start Feature of SWS Booster Pumps.Caused by Weakness in Design Control Process.Operating Procedures Revised |
- on 960321,design Noncompliance Noted for High Temp Automatic Start Feature of SWS Booster Pumps.Caused by Weakness in Design Control Process.Operating Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1996-006-01, :on 960207,service Water Pump Motor Flood Protection Not Provided.Caused by Inadequate Administrative Controls.Administrative Controls Established |
- on 960207,service Water Pump Motor Flood Protection Not Provided.Caused by Inadequate Administrative Controls.Administrative Controls Established
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000423/LER-1996-006-02, :on 960330,plant Shutdown Required by TS for AFW Containment Isolation Valves Declared Inoperable.Caused by Opened Valves Outside Containment.Unit Was Shutdown in Orderly Manner |
- on 960330,plant Shutdown Required by TS for AFW Containment Isolation Valves Declared Inoperable.Caused by Opened Valves Outside Containment.Unit Was Shutdown in Orderly Manner
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown | | 05000423/LER-1996-007, :on 960403,containment Recirculation Spray, Quench Spray & Safety Injection Sys Were Outside Design Basis Due to Design Errors.Design Reviews of Rss,Qss,Si & Other Sys Will Be Performed |
- on 960403,containment Recirculation Spray, Quench Spray & Safety Injection Sys Were Outside Design Basis Due to Design Errors.Design Reviews of Rss,Qss,Si & Other Sys Will Be Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000336/LER-1996-007, :on 960220,discovered RCS C/D Rate Exceeded TS Limit.Caused by Use of Wrong Temp Sensor.Plant Operating Procedures,Heatup/C/D Monitoring Computer Program & Operator Training Involving These Events Revised |
- on 960220,discovered RCS C/D Rate Exceeded TS Limit.Caused by Use of Wrong Temp Sensor.Plant Operating Procedures,Heatup/C/D Monitoring Computer Program & Operator Training Involving These Events Revised
| | | 05000423/LER-1996-007-01, :on 960403,CRS & Qs Sys Found Outside Design Basis Due to Design Errors.Restored Sys to Appropriate Design Basis Requirements Prior to Declaring Sys Inoperable |
- on 960403,CRS & Qs Sys Found Outside Design Basis Due to Design Errors.Restored Sys to Appropriate Design Basis Requirements Prior to Declaring Sys Inoperable
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability | | 05000423/LER-1996-007-02, Forwards LER 96-007-02 Which Supplements Rept Submitted on 960502,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B),10CFR50.73(a)(2)(v)(B&D), 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(vii)(B&D).Commitments in Response to Event, Encl | Forwards LER 96-007-02 Which Supplements Rept Submitted on 960502,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B),10CFR50.73(a)(2)(v)(B&D), 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(vii)(B&D).Commitments in Response to Event, Encl | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1996-008, :on 960222,concluded That Condition of Wire Mesh Screen Encl Over Two Containment Recirculation Suction Pipes Outside Design Basis.Caused by Const/Installation Error.Screen Encl Being Replaced |
- on 960222,concluded That Condition of Wire Mesh Screen Encl Over Two Containment Recirculation Suction Pipes Outside Design Basis.Caused by Const/Installation Error.Screen Encl Being Replaced
| | | 05000423/LER-1996-008-01, :on 960412,reactor Protection Sys Lead/Lag Time Constants Found non-conservative.Caused by Failure of Vendor to Identify Conservative Calibr Requirements.Tss Changed to Correctly Identify Direction of Conservatism |
- on 960412,reactor Protection Sys Lead/Lag Time Constants Found non-conservative.Caused by Failure of Vendor to Identify Conservative Calibr Requirements.Tss Changed to Correctly Identify Direction of Conservatism
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000423/LER-1996-009, :on 960423,inoperable Shutdown Margin Monitors from Low Count Rate Occurred Due to Inadequate Design Control.Reduced SMM Setpoint |
- on 960423,inoperable Shutdown Margin Monitors from Low Count Rate Occurred Due to Inadequate Design Control.Reduced SMM Setpoint
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000245/LER-1996-009-01, :on 960109,isolation Condenser Makeup Water Temperature Below Design Basis Limit,Determined.Caused by Inadequate Design Specification.Preliminary Assessment of non-ductile Failure of Isolation Condenser Sys Performed |
- on 960109,isolation Condenser Makeup Water Temperature Below Design Basis Limit,Determined.Caused by Inadequate Design Specification.Preliminary Assessment of non-ductile Failure of Isolation Condenser Sys Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1996-009-01, :on 960216,post LOCA Contianment Pressure Prevented Timely Extraction of PASS Air Sample & H Sample. Caused by Inadequate Assessment of Revised Post LOCA Response Analysis.Implemented Design Change |
- on 960216,post LOCA Contianment Pressure Prevented Timely Extraction of PASS Air Sample & H Sample. Caused by Inadequate Assessment of Revised Post LOCA Response Analysis.Implemented Design Change
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000423/LER-1996-009-02, Submits Table of Commitments Re LER 96-009-02 Per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii) | Submits Table of Commitments Re LER 96-009-02 Per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii) | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000336/LER-1996-010, :on 960222,identified That Containment Hydrogen Monitor Flow Could Not Be Established W/Containment at Atmospheric Pressure Due to Improper Setting of Sys Pressure Regulators.Sys Calib Procedure Will Be Revised |
- on 960222,identified That Containment Hydrogen Monitor Flow Could Not Be Established W/Containment at Atmospheric Pressure Due to Improper Setting of Sys Pressure Regulators.Sys Calib Procedure Will Be Revised
| | | 05000423/LER-1996-010-02, :on 960425,determined That Potential Failure Mode of Rod Control Sys Acopian Power Supplies Could Create Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Inadequate Design Review. Reset Feature Will Be Deleted |
- on 960425,determined That Potential Failure Mode of Rod Control Sys Acopian Power Supplies Could Create Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Inadequate Design Review. Reset Feature Will Be Deleted
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded | | 05000336/LER-1996-011-01, :on 960222,required Time to Enter Mode 5 Exceeded.Caused by Effective Action Not Being Initiated to Revise SDC & Cooldown Rate Monitoring Procedures.Operating & Surveillance Procedures Will Be Revised |
- on 960222,required Time to Enter Mode 5 Exceeded.Caused by Effective Action Not Being Initiated to Revise SDC & Cooldown Rate Monitoring Procedures.Operating & Surveillance Procedures Will Be Revised
| | | 05000423/LER-1996-011-02, :on 960512,determined That Both Trains of CR Envelope Pressurization Sys Inoperable Due to Imbalance in air-conditioning Sys.Cr air-conditioning Sys Rebalanced.W/ |
- on 960512,determined That Both Trains of CR Envelope Pressurization Sys Inoperable Due to Imbalance in air-conditioning Sys.Cr air-conditioning Sys Rebalanced.W/
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1996-012, :on 960515,containment Leakage in Excess of TS Limits Noted,Due to Valve Leakage.Containment Spray Line Penetration 100 Flushed to Remove Any Boron Deposits.W/ |
- on 960515,containment Leakage in Excess of TS Limits Noted,Due to Valve Leakage.Containment Spray Line Penetration 100 Flushed to Remove Any Boron Deposits.W/
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000336/LER-1996-012-01, :on 960228,SIS Drain Stop Valves Failed to Meet Functional Requirements of Ts.Caused by Personnel Error & Inadequate Retest Requirements.C/A:Valve 2-SI-618 Modified & Safety Related Solenoid Valves Inspected |
- on 960228,SIS Drain Stop Valves Failed to Meet Functional Requirements of Ts.Caused by Personnel Error & Inadequate Retest Requirements.C/A:Valve 2-SI-618 Modified & Safety Related Solenoid Valves Inspected
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000423/LER-1996-012-02, :on 960515,containment Leakage Exceeded Tech Spec Limit.Caused by Boric Acid Residue.Performed Flush of Line to Remove Boron Deposits |
- on 960515,containment Leakage Exceeded Tech Spec Limit.Caused by Boric Acid Residue.Performed Flush of Line to Remove Boron Deposits
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded | | 05000423/LER-1996-013, :on 960612,design Deficiency in Rhrs.Caused by Inconsideration That Failure Mode of RHS Flow Control Valves Could Create High RHS Heat Exchanger CCP Discharge Temps. Actuators for Heat Exchanger Valves,Modified |
- on 960612,design Deficiency in Rhrs.Caused by Inconsideration That Failure Mode of RHS Flow Control Valves Could Create High RHS Heat Exchanger CCP Discharge Temps. Actuators for Heat Exchanger Valves,Modified
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000336/LER-1996-013-01, :on 960314,assessed Wide Range Logarithmic Neutron Flux Monitors Nuclear Instrumentation Channels A,B,C & D as Inoperable Due to Potential Susceptability to Common Mode Failure.Replaced Failed Power Supply |
- on 960314,assessed Wide Range Logarithmic Neutron Flux Monitors Nuclear Instrumentation Channels A,B,C & D as Inoperable Due to Potential Susceptability to Common Mode Failure.Replaced Failed Power Supply
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000423/LER-1996-013-02, :on 960515,determined Design Deficiency in Residual Heat Removal System (Rhs).Caused by Original Plant Design.Corrective Actions Will Be Described in Supplement |
- on 960515,determined Design Deficiency in Residual Heat Removal System (Rhs).Caused by Original Plant Design.Corrective Actions Will Be Described in Supplement
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability | | 05000336/LER-1996-014-01, :on 960311,weekly TS Surveillances Missed. Caused by Personnel Error W/Respect to Scheduling.C/A: Implemented Requirements of Surveillance Procedure Sp 2614A-3 |
- on 960311,weekly TS Surveillances Missed. Caused by Personnel Error W/Respect to Scheduling.C/A: Implemented Requirements of Surveillance Procedure Sp 2614A-3
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000423/LER-1996-014-02, :on 960516,surveillances for Emergency Diesel Generator Performed During Operation,Versus Shutdown.Caused by Misinterpretation of Shutdown Stipulation.Surveillances Performed During Shutdown |
- on 960516,surveillances for Emergency Diesel Generator Performed During Operation,Versus Shutdown.Caused by Misinterpretation of Shutdown Stipulation.Surveillances Performed During Shutdown
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000423/LER-1996-015-05, Forwards LER 96-015-05,documenting Event That Occurred at Plant,Unit 3 on 960610,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B). Commitments Made within Ltr Submitted | Forwards LER 96-015-05,documenting Event That Occurred at Plant,Unit 3 on 960610,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B). Commitments Made within Ltr Submitted | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000423/LER-1996-015-04, Forwards LER 96-015-04,documenting Condition Determined at Unit 3 on 960610.Util Commitments in Response to Event Contained within Attachment 1 to Ltr | Forwards LER 96-015-04,documenting Condition Determined at Unit 3 on 960610.Util Commitments in Response to Event Contained within Attachment 1 to Ltr | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000336/LER-1996-015-01, :on 960312,failed to Perform Action Requirement for TS LCO 3.3.1.1.Caused by Failure to Recognize Applicability of TS During Abnormal Equipment Configuration. Revised Procedures |
- on 960312,failed to Perform Action Requirement for TS LCO 3.3.1.1.Caused by Failure to Recognize Applicability of TS During Abnormal Equipment Configuration. Revised Procedures
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1996-015-02, Forwards LER 96-015-02 Re Inadequate Electrical Separation Between Redundant Protection Trains Associated W/Reactor Trip Switches & Reactor Trip Breaker Indicating Lights | Forwards LER 96-015-02 Re Inadequate Electrical Separation Between Redundant Protection Trains Associated W/Reactor Trip Switches & Reactor Trip Breaker Indicating Lights | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability | | 05000423/LER-1996-016-02, :on 960619,switchgear Cabinet in Noncompliance W/Seismic Design Basis & Subsequently Inadvertent Esfa Signal Occurred.Personnel Did Not Latch Known Seismic Latches as Required.Engaged Latches |
- on 960619,switchgear Cabinet in Noncompliance W/Seismic Design Basis & Subsequently Inadvertent Esfa Signal Occurred.Personnel Did Not Latch Known Seismic Latches as Required.Engaged Latches
| | | 05000336/LER-1996-016-01, :on 960312,common Power Supply Cable to 4 Condenser Pit Level Switches Found Improperly Connected. Caused by Inadequate Work Control.Cable Properly Connected & Trip Circuits Tested |
- on 960312,common Power Supply Cable to 4 Condenser Pit Level Switches Found Improperly Connected. Caused by Inadequate Work Control.Cable Properly Connected & Trip Circuits Tested
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1996-017, :on 960320,discovered That Hydrogen Monitoring Sys Does Not Meet Single Failure Criterion by Reg Guide 1.97.Caused by Failure to Adequately Consider Sys Design Basis Requirements.Design Change Modified |
- on 960320,discovered That Hydrogen Monitoring Sys Does Not Meet Single Failure Criterion by Reg Guide 1.97.Caused by Failure to Adequately Consider Sys Design Basis Requirements.Design Change Modified
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000423/LER-1996-017-02, :on 960621,determined Design Deficiency Existed in Tornado Protection Ventilation Dampers,Could Have Affected EDGs Following Tornado.Caused by Inadequate Original Plant Const Design.Procedure Revised |
- on 960621,determined Design Deficiency Existed in Tornado Protection Ventilation Dampers,Could Have Affected EDGs Following Tornado.Caused by Inadequate Original Plant Const Design.Procedure Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat | | 05000336/LER-1996-018-01, Forwards LER 96-018-01,documenting Condition That Was Discovered at Unit 2 on 960319.LER Suppl Provides Update on Analyses & Investigation of Condition.Attachment 1 Is Clarification of Original Commitment Associated W/Ler | Forwards LER 96-018-01,documenting Condition That Was Discovered at Unit 2 on 960319.LER Suppl Provides Update on Analyses & Investigation of Condition.Attachment 1 Is Clarification of Original Commitment Associated W/Ler | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000336/LER-1996-018, :on 960316,gaps Discovered in Encls Door Seals for Motor Control Ctrs B51 & B61.Caused by Weakness in Existing Program to Inspect & Verify Integrity of Environ Protective Barriers.Doors for MCC B51 & MCC B61 Replaced |
- on 960316,gaps Discovered in Encls Door Seals for Motor Control Ctrs B51 & B61.Caused by Weakness in Existing Program to Inspect & Verify Integrity of Environ Protective Barriers.Doors for MCC B51 & MCC B61 Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000423/LER-1996-019-02, :on 960627,RCS PORV Block Valves Were Determined to Be Unable to Perform Intended Safety Functions.Caused by Structural Design Deficiency.C/A Will Be Provided in Supplement to Rept |
- on 960627,RCS PORV Block Valves Were Determined to Be Unable to Perform Intended Safety Functions.Caused by Structural Design Deficiency.C/A Will Be Provided in Supplement to Rept
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) |
|