ML20116K939

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 850419 Request for Review of Util Response to License Condition 23,Item 2 Re Content of Warning Signs & Decals in Emergency Planning Zone.Revised Wording for Signs & Decals Complies W/Aslb Conditions & Acceptable
ML20116K939
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/30/1985
From: Krimm R
Federal Emergency Management Agency
To: Jordan E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
References
NUDOCS 8505030431
Download: ML20116K939 (1)


Text

50-Vt3 1%

j

' y/ Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 o o APR 301985 MEM0RANDUM FOR: Edward L. Jordan Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Of fice of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. N clear Reg latory Commission FROM: chard . i Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological l Hazards Programs SUBJE CT: Catawba Nuclear Station Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) Actions Related to Offsite Emergency Preparedness

References:

1. ASLB Supplemental Partial Initial Decision on Emergency Planning (ASLBP No. 81-463-06 OL) dated September 18, 1984.
2. Memorandum of October 29, 1984, from Jordan to Krimm,

Subject:

Catawba Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Actions Related to Offsite Preparedness.

3. Duke Power Company letter dated March 18, 1985, with the attached response to License Condition No. 23.
4. Memorandum of April 19, 1985, from Jordan to Krimm,

Subject:

Review of Duke Power Company Submittal For Catawba in Response to Facility Operating License Condition No. 23.

This is in response to your April 19, 1985 memorandum in which you requested that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) review a response by the Duke Power Company to Item 2 in license condition No. 23 for the Catawba Nuclear Station. Iten 2 in license condition No. 23 pertains to the content of warning signs and decals to be installed in the emergency planning zone.

FEMA has reviewed the revised wording for the signs and decals as provided in the March 18, 1985 letter from Hal B. Tucker to Harold R. Denton. The revised wording complies with the conditions stipulated by the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board and is, therefore, now acceptable.

If you have any questions on the above, please contact Mr. Robert S. Wilkerson, Chief, Technological Hazards Division, at 287-0200.

%Nhk F

3 1

l$ -@ 0